1: %\documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \documentclass[aps, preprint, eqsecnum, showkeys]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphics}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{Superstructure in nano-crystalline $Al_{50}Cu_{28}Fe_{22}$ alloy}
8: \author{T.P. Yadav}
9: \email{yadavtp22@rediffmail.com}
10: \author{N.K. Mukhopadhyay$\dagger$}
11: \author{ R.S.Tiwari}
12: \author{O.N.Srivastava}
13: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005, India, \\
14: $\dagger$ Department of Metallurgical Engg., IT, Banaras Hindu University Varanasi-221005, India}
15: %\date{\today}
16: \begin{abstract}
17: {\it This work reports the formation of nano- crystalline $Al_{50} Cu_{28} Fe_{22}$ by
18: high-energy milling.
19: For obtaining the nano-crystalline material, the $Al_{50} Cu_{28} Fe_{22}$ alloy
20: synthesized through slow cooling of the molten alloy was subjected to ball milling,
21: which was carried out in attritor mill at $400 rpm$ for $5 h , 10 h, 20 h , 40 h$ and $80 h$
22: with a ball to powder ratio $40 : 1$ in hexane medium. The x-ray diffraction observation of
23: ball-milled samples revealed that the milling duration of $5h$ to $40 hrs$ has led to the
24: formation of nano-phase. The average crystallite size comprising the nano-phase has been
25: found to be $\sim 17 nm$. When the nano-crystalline alloy, $Al_{50} Cu_{28} Fe_{22}$ was vacuum
26: annealed at a temperature of 500$^0C$ for 5 to 20 $hrs$, new structural phases
27: representing superstructures of the parent nano-crystalline phase were found .
28: The superstructure have been found to correspond to simple cubic with $a = \sqrt 2a_p$ and
29: face central cubic with $a = 2a_p$ ( $a_p$ = lattce parameter of parent nano-crystalline alloy).
30: It has been proposed that the formation of different type of superstructure resulting
31: due to different duration of ball milling followed by annealing is possibly governed
32: by minimization of free energy of the disordered B2 phase.}
33: \end{abstract}
34:
35: \keywords{quasicrystal; nano-crystal; ball milling; superstructure; B2 phase}
36: \maketitle
37:
38: \section{\bf Introduction}
39: Recently there has been a considerable scientific and technological interest in the
40: formation of nano-crystalline/quasicrystalline phase in the $Al-Cu-Fe$ alloys by
41: mechanical milling [1]. Quasicrystals have many properties which make them interesting
42: for industrial applications like light weight, large strength to weight ratio and
43: high hardness with a low frictional coefficient [2]. Nanostructured material,
44: which can be defined as a material with the crystallite size less than $100 nm$ are
45: synthesized by either bottom-up or top-down processes [3]. The bottom up approach
46: starts with atoms, ions or molecules as building blocks and assembles nanoscale
47: clusters or bulk material from them. The top down approach for processing of
48: nanostructured materials starts with bulk solid and ends in obtaining a nano
49: ostructured phase through special processing routes e.g. mechanical milling,
50: re-solidification through chemical methods etc. Nano-phase materials have significantly
51: different behaviour from their macroscopic counterparts because their sizes are smaller
52: than the characteristic length scales of physical phenomena occurring in bulk materials [4].
53: The nanostructure materials are produced by using various methods, among which
54: high-energy ball milling (BM) which is also known as mechanical milling (MM)
55: has attracted much attention [5]. The advantages of high-energy ball milling for
56: the synthesis of nano-structured materials are the formation of a more homogeneous
57: product and good reproducibility [6]. The mechanical milling technique has been used
58: to obtain amorphous alloys [7], high coercively permanent magnetic metallic compounds [8]
59: and quasicrystals [9-10]. The formation of a quasicrystalline phase by BM/MM has been
60: reported in a number of $Al$ and $Ti$ based systems [11]. Recently Mukhopadhyay et al [12]
61: have studied the effect of mechanical milling on the stability of $Al$-rich, $Al-Cu-Fe$
62: and $Al-Cu-Co$ quasicrystalline alloys. They have reported that the icosahedral
63: quasicrystalline phase in $Al-Cu-Fe$ system undergoes transformation to a bcc (B2 type)
64: crystalline phase as a result of ball milling [13]. In this case, B2 phase does not
65: transform into any other crystalline/quasicrystalline phase during isothermal
66: annealing at 850$^0C$ up to 20h. It has been concluded that the B2 phase is more stable
67: than the icosahedral quasicrystalline phase at those compositions. It should be
68: mentioned that $Al$-rich $Al_{65}Cu_{20}Fe_{15}$ system is of significant interest due to the
69: high temperature structural stability of icosahedral quasicrystalline phase.
70: The available phase equilibria data indicate that the B2 phase is a major phase
71: on the $Al$-deficient side of stoichiometry [14]. The B2 structure can be understood
72: in term of ordering in a bcc lattice and converting it to be a simple cubic lattice.
73: Therefore, unlike a bcc lattice, one type of atom occupies the body-centered position
74: and another type occupies the cube corners in the ordered lattice. When the
75: composition deviates from the stoichiometry, the compositional defects must be
76: introduced to preserve the crystal structure. Its unit cell contains two different
77: atoms located respectively at the vertex and at the center of the cube. It is one
78: of the basic simple structures that can transform into more complex structures via
79: twinning at the atomic level, termed as chemical twinning [15]. The B2 type phase
80: is often present together with the quasicrystals and has fixed coherent orientation
81: relationship with the latter [16-17]. The detailed investigation of the B2 phase
82: is also important due to its practical applications [18-19]. Though quasicrystals
83: have many curious properties, they are also extremely brittle, porous and
84: composition-sensitive. It is therefore interesting to substitute them by approximant
85: materials, particularly B2 based ones, which are more easily prepared and have
86: similar performance characteristics [20].
87: The purpose of the present study is to investigate the influence of high-energy
88: ball milling on the phase stability, crystallite size, lattice strain and
89: lattice parameter of B2 phase formed in the pre-alloyed $Al_{50}Cu_{28}Fe_{22}$ sample.
90: Present investigation clearly shows the evolution of ordered simple cubic
91: phase ($a_{sc} =4.12\AA$) and as well as fcc ($a_{fcc}=5.8 \AA$) $\tau 2$ phase after milling followed
92: by annealing. The evolution of the nano-structure at different stages of ball
93: milling has also been investigated.
94:
95: \section{\bf Experimental Details:}
96:
97: An alloy of composition $Al_{50}Cu_{28}Fe_{22}$ was prepared by melting the high purity
98: $Al, Cu$ and $Fe$ metals in an induction furnace, in the presence of dry argon atmosphere.
99: The ingot formed was re-melted several times to ensure better homogeneity. The as-cast
100: ingot was crushed to particles less than $0.5$ mm in size and placed in an attritor ball
101: mill (Szegvari Attritor) with a ball to powder weight ratio of $40:1$. The attritor
102: has a cylindrical stainless steel tank of inner diameter $13 cm$ and the angular
103: speed of mill was maintained at 400 rpm. The milling operation was conducted from
104: 5 to 80h using hexane as a process control agent. The powder obtained after
105: $10h$ and $80h$ of milling were annealed isothermally at $500 ^0C$ for 5 to $20h$ in the
106: evacuated quartz capsules (with vacuum of $10^{-6}$ $torr$). The milled and heat-treated
107: powders were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Philips 1710 X-ray
108: diffractometer with $CuK_\alpha$ radiation. The effective crystallite size and relative
109: strain of mechanically milled powders as well as heat-treated products were calculated
110: based on line broadening of XRD peaks. The use of the Voigt function for the
111: analysis of the integral breadths of broadened X-ray diffraction line profiles
112: forms the basis of a rapid and powerful single line method of crystallite-size
113: and strain determination. In this case the constituent Couchy and Gaussian
114: components can be obtained from the ratio of full width at half maximum
115: intensity($2\omega$) and integral breadth ($\beta$) [21]. In a single line analysis the apparent
116: crystallite size 'D' and strain 'e' can be related to Couchy ($\beta_c$) and Gaussian
117: ($\beta_G$) widths of the diffraction peak at the Bragg angle ;
118: \begin{equation}
119: D = \frac{\lambda}{ \beta_c cos\theta}
120: \end{equation}
121:
122: and
123: \begin{equation}
124: e = \frac{\beta_G} {4 tan\theta}
125: \end{equation}
126:
127:
128: The constituent Couchy and Gassian components can be given as
129: \begin{equation}
130: \beta_c = (a_0+a_1\psi+a_2\psi^2)\beta
131: \end{equation}
132:
133: \begin{equation}
134: \beta_G = [b_0 + b_{1/2} (\psi-2/\pi)^{1/2}+b_1\psi+b_2\psi^2)]\beta
135: \end{equation}
136: where $a_0, a_1$ and $a_2$ are Couchy constants $b_0, b_{1/2}, b_1$ and $b_2$ are Gassian constants
137: and $\psi$ is $2\omega/\beta $ where $\beta$ is the integral breadth obtained from XRD peak. The value
138: of Couchy and Gassian constant have taken from the table of Langford [21]
139: \vspace{0.5cm}
140:
141: $a_0 = 2.0207,\hspace{1cm} a_1 = - 0.4803, \hspace{1cm} a_2 = - 1.7756$
142:
143: $b_0 = 0.6420, \hspace{1cm} b_{1/2} = 1.4187,\hspace{1cm} b_1 = 2.2043,\hspace{1cm} b_2 = 1.8706$
144:
145: \vspace{0.5cm}
146:
147: From these, we have calculated the crystallite size D
148: and the lattice strain 'e' for the milled $Al_{50}Cu_{28}Fe_{22}$ powders.
149:
150: \section{\bf Results and discussion}
151:
152: The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns for the $Al_{50}Cu_{28}Fe_{22}$ alloy obtained
153: after various milling durations has been shown in figure 1.
154: Curve (a) shows the B2 phase
155: obtained from the as-cast ingot material and curve (b), (c), (d), and (e)
156: are the XRD patterns from the powder milled for $5 h, 10h, 20h, 40h$ and $80h$
157: respectively. It can be seen from Fig.1 that the peak corresponding to the
158: (110) profiles of the B2 phase becomes broader and the intensity gets reduced
159: with increasing milling time. These two effects are mainly attributed to the
160: increase of the internal lattice strain and reduction of the grain size. The
161: evolution of the nano crystalline phase in $Al_{50}Cu_{28}Fe_{22}$ can be easily noticed
162: from the increase in the broadening of x-ray diffraction lines (Fig.1) during
163: different period of ball milling. It should be noted that the shift of the peaks
164: towards lower $\theta$ angle side with the increase in milling time indicates the
165: increase in lattice parameter. Intensity of (110) peak goes on decreasing with
166: increasing milling time. After $80h$ of milling, a diffuse broad peak appears
167: indicating the transformation of the B2 phase to an amorphous phase. (see Fig. 1e).
168: XRD pattern clearly indicates that the initial sharp diffraction lines
169: get considerably broadened after ball milling, suggesting that the nano-crystalline
170: phase appears as a result of milling.
171:
172: To study the effect of annealing on the MM powders, the samples milled for
173: 10 hrs and 80hrs were subjected to annealing for various time periods.
174: Fig. 2 (a), (b),(c) and (d) show the XRD pattern obtained after $10 h$ of ball
175: milling followed by annealing at $500 ^0C$ for $0h, 5h, 10h$ and $20h$ respectively.
176: The XRD patterns corresponding to $10h$ and $20h$ , the annealed samples (Fig.2 (b,c))
177: have been indexed using simple a cubic structure with $a_{sc} = 4.1\AA$ . The most
178: interesting feature to be noted is that these samples show cubic structure,
179: which is a superstructure of the B2 phase. The lattice parameters of the
180: superstructure phase and B2 phase are interrelated as $a_{sc}=\sqrt{2} a_p$, where $a_p$ is
181: the lattice parameter of the B2 phase which is a parent phase. The formation of
182: the superstructure due to the ball milling and subsequent annealing has been
183: observed for the first time in $Al-Cu-Fe$ alloy. We propose a structural model for
184: this new superstructure of B2 phase. Fig. 3 shows the structural model of
185: superstructure with lattice parameter $\sqrt{2} a$ times of B2 phase ($a_p =2.911\AA$), which
186: is obtained from the powder after ball milling for 10 h and subsequent annealing
187: at 500$^0C$ for $20h$. Figure 3(a) shows two-dimensional model of superstructure,
188: which clearly indicates that the face diagonal of a cube is playing a key role
189: for the formation of the superstructure of B2 phase. The three dimensional model
190: (fig. 3(b)) clearly depicts the unit cell of the superstructure of the B2 phase.
191: The edge of the unit cell is the diagonal of a cube face ($\sqrt{2} a_p=4.18\AA$).
192: The lattice parameter of the superstructure phase, which is calculated from
193: the model, exactly matches with the lattice parameter obtained from XRD of 10h
194: ball milled and 20h-annealed powders.
195:
196: Fig. 4 (a) (b) (c) and (d) show the XRD patterns corresponding to $80 h$ ball
197: milled $Al_{50}Cu_{28}Fe_{22}$ powders annealed at 500$^0C$ for 0, 5, 10 and $20h$ respectively.
198: In the case of $20h$ annealing, the sample has been cooled slowly to avoid the
199: quenching effects and detect any transformation during cooling. Unlike the sample
200: milled for $10h$ and annealed at 500$^0C$ for 10/20 h, the XRD pattern shown in fig.4 (d)
201: could be indexed only in terms of a fcc structure with $a=5.84\AA $. However,
202: the lattice parameter of this fcc phase is also related to B2 phase as $a_{fcc}=2a_p$.
203: The evolution of $\tau 2$ phases in 80 h ball milled and 20h annealed powder can easily
204: be explained by the structural model shown in Fig.5. We propose two-dimensional
205: geometrical model as outlined for the formation of $\tau 2$ phases from the present B2 phase.
206: Figure 5(b) shows the relationship between quasicrystllaine and related crystalline ($\tau 2$)
207: phases. The model is based on the concept of a polytope and an eight dimensional
208: root lattice. Its basic atomic cluster forms a cuboctahedron with 12 vertices
209: formed by intersection of three perpendicular squares with edge length of $\sqrt{2}. \sqrt{2} a$.
210: This polyhedron is transformed into an icosahedron when the squares are changed
211: into rectangles with edge length ratio of $\tau:1$. The properties of the eight
212: dimensional root lattice give foundation to the possibility of mapping a
213: quasicrystllaine structure on a crystalline structure . The proposed geometrical
214: model can be applied also to the polymorphoic bcc-fcc transformation
215:
216: \section{\bf Conclusions}
217:
218: On the basis of our present investigation it may be conclude that, the formation
219: of the nano B2 phase starts after 5h of milling and gets completed after 40h
220: of milling. Beyond 40h of milling the amorphous phase starts forming and the
221: sample shows the coexistence of nano-crystalline and amorphous phases. After 80h
222: of milling nano B2 phase transforms to amorphous phase completely.
223: The $Al_{50}Cu_{28}Fe_{22}$ samples ball milled for 10h and 80h and annealed subsequently
224: at 500$^0C$ for 20h, transform to the simple cubic ( $a_{sc} = \sqrt{2} a_p$) and the fcc
225: ($a_{fcc} = 2 a_p$) phases respectively.
226:
227: {\bf Acknowledgement}
228:
229: The authors would like to thank Prof. A. R. Verma, Prof. S. Ranganathan,
230: Prof. S. Lele and Prof. B.S.Murty for many stimulating discussions. The financial
231: support from Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources (MNES), New Delhi,
232: India is gratefully acknowledged. One of the authors (TPY) acknowledges the
233: support of CSIR for award of senior research fellowship.
234:
235: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
236: \bibitem{1} N.K. Mukhopadhyay, T.P. Yadav and O.N.Srivastava, Phil. Mag. A. 82 (2002) 2979.
237: \bibitem{2} N.K. Mukhopadhyay, Current Science 82 (2002) 1.
238: \bibitem{3} E.L.Hu and D.T.Shaw, Nanostructure Science and Technology ed.by R.W.Siegel , E.L Hu and M.C.Raco ( Kluwer Academic Pule: Dordrecht, 1999 ) 15.
239: \bibitem{4} H.Gleiter , Acta Mater. 48 ( 2000 ) 1.
240: \bibitem{5} C. Suryanarayana. Progr. Mater. Sci. 46 ( 2001 ) 1.
241: \bibitem{6} R.B. Schwarz and C.C Koch App. Phys. Lett. 9 ( 1986 ) 146.
242: \bibitem{7} A.W. Weeber and H. Baker, Phyics B. 153 (1988) 93.
243: \bibitem{8} E. Hellstern, H.J.Ffecht, Z. Fu and W.L. Johnson. J. Mater. Res. 4, (1989) 1292.
244: \bibitem{9} J. Eckert, L. Schultz and K. Urban ,Appl. Phy. Lett. 55 (1989) 117.
245: \bibitem{10} P. Barua, V. Srinivas and B.S. Murty, Phil Mag. A 80 (2000) 1207.
246: \bibitem{11} A. Takasaki, C.H. Han, Y. Furuya and K.F. Kelton, Phil. Mag. Lett. 82, (2002) 353.
247: \bibitem{12} N.K. Mukhopadhyay, T.P. Yadav and O.N.Srivastava, Phil. Mag. Lett. 83.(2003) 423.
248: \bibitem{13} T.P.Yadav , N.K. Mukhopadhyay, R.S.Tiwari and O.N.Srivastava, Trans IIM 65 (2003) 577.
249: \bibitem{14} Hand book of ternary alloy phase diagrams, P . Villars, A. Prince and H.Okamoto, Editors, Materials Park, ASM International .OH (1995).
250: \bibitem{15} Hong Zhang and K.H.Kuo, Scripta Metar. 23 (1985) 355.
251: \bibitem{16} C.Dong, J.M. Dubois, S.S.Kang and M Audier, Phil. Mag. B 65 ( 1992 ) 107.
252: \bibitem{17} S.M.Lee , J.H.Jeon H.B.Kim ,T.W.Kim and D.H.Kim ,Mater. Sci. Engg. A 304, 306 (2001) 871.
253: \bibitem{18} J.M. Dubois, Phys. Scr. 49 ( 1993 ) 17.
254: \bibitem{19} T.P. Yadav, R.S.Tiwari and O.N.Srivastava, J. Non Crystalline Solids
255: 334, 335 (2004 ) 39.
256: \bibitem{20} V . Fournee E Belin and J.M.Dubois, J Phys. Cond. Matter 10 (1998) 4231.
257: [21] TH.H.DE Keljser, J.I.Langford , E.J.Mittemeijer and A.B.P.Vogels J.Appl. Cryst. 15(1982) 308
258: \end{thebibliography}
259: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
260: %\pagebreak
261:
262: \begin{figure}
263: %\includegraphics[width=5.0in]{fig1.eps}
264: \caption{X-ray differaction patterns of as-cast powder (a), Ball-milled powder
265: after various milling times 5h (b), 10h (c), 20h (d), 40h (e) and 80h (h).
266: }
267: %\end{figure}
268: %\begin{figure}
269: %\includegraphics[width=5.0in]{fig2.eps}
270: \caption{XRD patterns obtained from the powder after Ball milling for 10h (a) and
271: subsequent annealing at 500$^0C$ for 5h (b), 10h (c) and 20h (d).
272: }
273: %\end{figure}
274: %\begin{figure}
275: %\includegraphics[width=5.0in]{fig3.eps}
276: \caption{The Structural model of the simple cubic superstructure with
277: $a_{sc} = \sqrt{2}a_p$ of B2 phase, obtained from the powder after ball milling for 10 h
278: and subsequent annealing at 500 $^0C$ for 20h}
279: %\end{figure}
280: %\begin{figure}
281: %\includegraphics[width=5.0in]{fig4.eps}
282: \caption{The XRD pattern obtained from the powder after ball milling for 80 h, (a) and
283: subsequent annealing at 500$^0C$ for 5 h (b), 10 h (c) and 20 h (d). The curve (d)
284: indicates fcc superstructure with $a_{fcc} = 2 a_p$ of B2 phase ($a_p =2.92\AA$)
285: }
286: %\end{figure}
287: %\begin{figure}
288: %\includegraphics[width=5.0in]{fig5.eps}
289: \caption{he Structural model of the fcc superstructure with $a_{fcc} = 2 a_p$
290: of B2 phase, obtained from the powder after ball milling for 80 h and
291: subsequent annealing at 500$^0C$ for 20 h}
292: \end{figure}
293: \end{document}
294: