1: 

2: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}

3: %\newcommand{\gguide}{{\it Preparing graphics for IOP journals}}

4: %Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required

5: %\usepackage{iopams}  

6: \usepackage{graphicx}

7: \begin{document}

8: 

9: \title[Polymer solutions]{Polymer solutions: from hard monomers to soft polymers}

10: 

11: \author{Jean-Pierre Hansen, Chris I. Addison and Ard A. Louis}

12: 

13: \address{Dept. Chemistry, Lensfield Rd, Cambridge, CB2 1EW (UK)}

14: \begin{abstract}

15: A coarse-graining strategy for dilute and semi-dilute solutions of

16: interacting polymers, and of colloid polymer mixtures is briefly

17: described.  Monomer degrees of freedom are traced out to derive an

18: effective, state dependent pair potential between the polymer centres

19: of mass.  The cross-over between good and poor solvent conditions is

20: discussed within a scaling analysis.  The method is extended to block

21: copolymers represented as ``necklaces'' of soft ``blobs'', and its

22: success is illustrated here in the case of a symmetric diblock

23: copolymer which exhibits microphase separation.

24: \end{abstract}

25: 

26: %Uncomment for PACS numbers title message

27: %\pacs{00.00, 20.00, 42.10}

28: % Keywords required only for MST, PB, PMB, PM, JOA, JOB? 

29: %\vspace{2pc}

30: %\noindent{\it Keywords}: Article preparation, IOP journals

31: % Uncomment for Submitted to journal title message

32: %\submitto{\JPA}

33: % Comment out if separate title page not required

34: \maketitle

35: 

36: \section{Introduction: a coarse-graining strategy}

37: 

38: The present paper summarises a collective effort by the Cambridge

39: group and others to bridge the ``cultural divide'' between statistical

40: mechanics of polymer solutions and melts on one hand and of ``simple

41: liquids'' on the other.  While the former is dominated by

42: field-theoretic methods and scaling concepts pioneered by S.F. Edwards

43: and P.G. de Gennes, the description of simple liquids, which lack the

44: scale invariance of polymers, requires a more atomistic approach.  To

45: bridge the gap we have developed a systematic coarse-graining strategy

46: first suggested by Flory and Krigbaum\cite{flory}, whereby individual

47: monomer degrees of freedom are traced out for fixed centre-of-mass

48: (CM) positions of the polymer coils, thus defining an effective

49: interaction between the CMs.  Consider a system of N identical

50: polymer, each consisting of M monomers (or segments) at positions

51: $\vec r_{i \alpha}$ $(1\leq i \leq N ; 1\leq \alpha \leq M)$.  If

52: $H(\{\vec r_{i \alpha}\})$ is the interaction hamiltonian of the

53: system, the probability distribution of the N CMs at positions

54: $\vec R_i$ is

55: \begin{eqnarray}

56: \label{eq1}

57: P_N(\{\vec R_i\})&

58: =\frac{1}{Q_N} \int e^{-\beta H(\{\vec r_{i \alpha}\})} \prod_{i=1}^{N}\delta(\vec R_i - \frac{1}{M}\sum_\alpha \vec r_{i \alpha}) \prod_{i=1}^{N} \prod_{\alpha=1}^{M} d \vec r_{i\alpha}\\

59: &=\frac{e^{-\beta V_{eff}(\{\vec R_i\})}} {\int e^{-\beta V_{eff}(\{\vec R_i\})} \prod_{i=1}^{N} d \vec R_{i}}

60: \end{eqnarray}

61: where $\beta=\frac{1}{k_BT}$, $Q_N$ is the partition function for the

62: $N\times M$ monomers, and the total effective interaction energy of

63: the N CMs is rigorously defined by:

64: \begin{eqnarray}

65: \label{eq2}

66: V_{eff}(\{\vec R_i\})=-k_BT \ln[C \times P_N(\{\vec R_i\})]

67: \end{eqnarray}

68: This effective energy is a free energy, and hence state-dependent,

69: and, in general, many-body in nature.  In the low concentration limit,

70: (\ref{eq2}) reduces to a sum of effective pair interactions between

71: two isolated polymer coils:

72: \begin{eqnarray}

73: \label{eq3}

74: v_2(|\vec R_1 -\vec R_2|)=-k_BT \ln[C \times P_2 (\vec R_1,\vec R_2)]

75: \end{eqnarray}

76: Since global properties of polymeric systems are independent of

77: chemical detail in the scaling ($L\rightarrow \infty$) limit, we adopt

78: henceforth a simple lattice model of polymer solutions namely that of

79: mutually and self-avoiding walks (SAW) of length $L=M-1$ on a cubic

80: lattice of lattice spacing $b$ (equal to the segment length);

81: non-connected nearest neighbour monomers of the same or different

82: polymer coils have an attractive energy $-\epsilon$.  This model

83: accounts for the key polymer features, namely connectivity, excluded

84: volume and solvent quality (through the value of $\epsilon$).

85: 

86: Convenient thermodynamic variables are the polymer density

87: $\rho=N/(\Omega b^3)$ ($\Omega$ being the size of the lattice), the

88: monomer density $c=M\rho$ (equivalently the monomer packing fraction

89: $\phi=cb^3$ equal to the number of lattice sites occupied by monomers)

90: and the temperature T ($\beta^*=\epsilon/k_BT)$.  A key

91: characteristic is the overlap density $\rho^*=3/4\pi R{_g}{^3}$

92: (where $R_g$ is the radius of gyration, $\sim bL^\nu$) which corresponds to the

93: cross-over from the dilute ($\rho <\rho^*$) to the semi-dilute regimes

94: ($\rho >\rho^*$).  The semi-dilute regime differs from the melt in

95: that the monomer packing fraction remains negligible; for any given

96: $\rho/\rho^*$ this is only achieved for sufficiently long polymers,

97: since $\phi=(\rho/\rho^*) L^{(1-3\nu)} \sim L^{-4/5}$ for SAW polymers.

98: 

99: \section{Polymers in good solvent}

100: Consider first the athermal limit of SAW polymers ($\epsilon=0$).  In

101: the low ($\rho\rightarrow 0$) density limit $P_2 (\vec

102: R_1,\vec R_2)$ is then simply the probability that there is

103: no monomer-monomer overlap for a fixed distance $r=|\vec

104: R_1 -\vec R_2|$ between the CMs.  This is well adapted to

105: Monte-Carlo (MC) sampling.  Scaling theory predicts that the resulting

106: effective interaction at full overlap, $v_2(r=0)$ is independent of

107: chain length L\cite{gros}.  Early simulations with rather short

108: chains pointed to $v_2(r=0) \approx 2k_BT$\cite{daut}.  An in-depth

109: investigation of the L-dependence shows that $v_2(r)$ is well

110: represented by a Gaussian $v_2(r) \approx u

111: exp(-\alpha(r/R_g)^2)$, where $\alpha$ is of order 1, while

112: $u/k_BT \approx 1.80$ \cite{bolh}\cite{pelis}.\\ At finite

113: polymer concentration $\rho$, three and more-body effective

114: interactions come into play\cite{bolh2}. A more efficient strategy is

115: to determine an effective density-dependent pair potential

116: $v_2(r;\rho)$ by inverting the CM-CM pair distribution $g(r)$ from full

117: monomer-level MC simulations\cite{bolh2}\cite{louis}.  It was proven

118: that this inverse problem has a unique solution\cite{hend}.  The

119: inversion procedure is implemented using the HNC-integral

120: equation\cite{hansen}. The Ornstein-Zernike relation\cite{hansen}

121: allows the extraction of the direct correlation function $c(r)$ from

122: the MC data for $h(r)=g(r)-1$ at any given density.  The HNC closure then expresses $v_2(r)$ as \cite{hansen}:

123: \begin{eqnarray}

124: \label{eq4}

125: \beta v_2(r)=-\ln[g(r)]+h(r)-c(r).

126: \end{eqnarray}

127: The first term on the r.h.s. is the potential of mean force, while

128: $h(r)-c(r)$ describes the effect of correlations.\\ 

129: 

130: The MC generated $g(r)$ show that correlations {\it decrease} as $\rho$

131: increases, contrary to the more familiar behaviour observed for hard

132: core systems.  The overlap value $g(r=0)$ increases steadily toward 1

133: (the ideal gas value) confirming that in the high density limit of a

134: melt, polymer chains indeed behave as non-interacting

135: polymers\cite{rubin}.  The resulting effective pair potential is only

136: moderately density dependent and is well fitted by a sum of gaussians.

137: The range of $v_2(r)$ tends to increase with $\rho$, and the potential

138: develops a small amplitude negative tail for $r$ significantly larger

139: than $R_g$\cite{bolh}\cite{bolh3}.\\ 

140: The link with thermodynamics is via the

141: compressibility relation\cite{hansen}, which allows the osmotic

142: pressure $P$ to be expressed as:

143: \begin{eqnarray}

144: \label{eq5}

145: \beta P(\rho)= \int_{0}^{\rho}[1-\rho'\hat{c}(k=0;\rho')]d\rho'  

146: \end{eqnarray}

147: where $\hat{c}(k)$ is the Fourier transform of $c(r)$.  Use of the

148: effective pair potential in conjunction with the virial and energy

149: equations is meaningless\cite{louis5}.  The equations of state

150: calculated from MC simulations of the full monomer level polymer

151: representation and from simulations based on the much less

152: CPU-intensive effective potential representation agree within

153: numerical uncertainties, underlining the adequacy if the HNC inversion

154: procedure for such ``soft'' effective particles.  Well into the

155: semi-dilute regime ($\rho \gg \rho^*$) the slopes of the calculated

156: equation of state agrees with the des Cloizeaux scaling prediction

157: $\beta P \approx \rho^{3\nu/(3\nu -1)} \approx \rho^{9/4}$, where

158: $\nu=0.588 \approx 3/5$ is the Flory exponent for the radius of

159: gyration in good solvent($R_g \sim bL^\nu)$\cite{rubin}.\\

160: Neglecting the density-dependence of $v_2(r)$, {\it i.e.} extending

161: the low density gaussian form to all densities, brings us back to the

162: ``Gaussian core model'' (GCM) first introduced by

163: Stillinger\cite{stil}, which exhibits interesting behaviour at low

164: temperatures ($\beta^* \gg 1)$\cite{lang}.  In the regime relevant for

165: polymer solutions ($\beta^* \approx 1)$ the model leads to ``mean

166: field fluid'' behaviour at sufficiently high density, where the random

167: phase approximation, $c(r)=-\beta v_2(r)$ leads to a quadratic

168: equation-of-state for $\rho \gg \rho^*$\cite{lang}\cite{louis2}:

169: \begin{eqnarray}

170: \label{eq6}

171: \beta P=\rho+ \frac{1}{2}\beta \hat{v}_2(k=0)\rho^2

172: \end{eqnarray}

173: Incorporating the $\rho$-dependence of $v_2$ is thus seen to change

174: the asymptotic $\rho^2$ behaviour into des Cloizeaux scaling

175: $\rho^{9/4}$.  As a by-product of the GCM, we have developed a

176: multiple occupancy lattice model, which also gives rise to interesting

177: microphase separation\cite{finken}.

178: 

179: \section{From good to poor solvent conditions}

180: We now turn our attention to the case where adjacent monomers attract,

181: {\it i.e.} $\epsilon\neq 0$ or $\beta^*>0$.  This

182: attraction is solvent induced, and the quality of the solvent

183: deteriorates as $\beta^*$ increases, leading to contraction of the

184: polymer coils.  At the $\theta$ temperature ($\beta^*_\theta =

185: \epsilon/k_BT_\theta$), repulsion and attraction between polymers

186: cancel, at least in the low density limit, so that polymers exhibit

187: the scaling behaviour of ideal polymers($R_g \sim L^{1/2}$).  Below

188: $T_\theta$, polymer coils collapse into globules ($R_g \sim L^{1/3}$),

189: and phase separation occurs into polymer-rich and polymer-poor

190: solutions. \\ 

191: The most convenient diagnostic for locating $T_\theta$

192: from simulations is to calculate the second virial coefficient

193: $B_2(L;T)$ as a function of temperature

194: and polymer length.  The L-dependent Boyle temperature $T_B(L)$ is

195: that at which $B_2(L;T)$ vanishes for a fixed L, then:

196: \begin{eqnarray}

197: \label{eq7}

198: T_\theta=\lim_{L \rightarrow \infty}T_B(L)

199: \end{eqnarray}

200: This leads to the estimate $\beta^*_\theta=0.2690 \pm 0.0002$

201: \cite{grass}.  Note that $B_2(L;T)$ can be directly expressed in

202: terms of the low density limit of the effective CM pair potential:

203: \begin{eqnarray}

204: \label{eq8}

205: B_2(L;T)=2\pi \int_0^\infty[1-e^{-\beta v_2(r, L, T)}]r^2dr

206: \end{eqnarray}

207: Extensive MC simulations were used to determine the effective pair

208: potential for fixed length $L=100$ over a wide range of

209: temperatures($0\leq\beta^* \leq 0.3$) and densities $\rho$\cite{krak}.

210: As $\beta^*$ increases, $v_2(r=0)$ decreases and $v_2(r)$ develops an

211: attractive tail for $r > R_g$.  Eventually $v_2(r)$ violates Ruelle's

212: necessary condition for the existence of a thermodynamic limit,

213: namely\cite{ruel}:

214: \begin{eqnarray}

215: \label{eq9}

216: I_2=\int v_2(r) d \vec{r} >0 

217: \end{eqnarray}

218: Since $v_2$ depends on $L$, $\rho$ and $T$, so does $I_2$, and for any given $\rho$ and $L$, the limit of stability temperature $T_s$ is determined by 

219: \begin{eqnarray}

220: \label{eq10}

221: I_2(L,\rho, T=T_s)=0

222: \end{eqnarray}

223: Below $T_s$, single polymer coils will collapse and we conjecture that

224: $T_\theta=\lim_{\rho \rightarrow 0} \lim_{L \rightarrow \infty}

225: T_s(\rho, L) $\cite{krak}.  However, if $\rho$ is increased at a given

226: temperature $T\leq T_\theta$ the effective pair potential increasingly

227: reverts to being repulsive until the Ruelle criterion\cite{hansen} is

228: satisfied, and the polymer solution becomes thermodynamically stable

229: again. This ``restabilisation'' reflects a phase separation scenario

230: under poor solvent conditions($T < T_\theta$). \\ The variation of

231: $v_2(r)$ with temperature and density, as extracted from the HNC

232: inversion of MC data, is semi-quantitatively reproduced by solutions

233: of the PRISM integral equation\cite{schw} for the thread

234: model($b\rightarrow0, L\rightarrow\infty$ at fixed $R_g$) of polymer

235: solutions\cite{fuchs}\cite{krak2}.  PRISM assumes all monomers to be

236: equivalent ({\it i.e.} neglects ends effects) and yields the monomer

237: pair distribution function $g_{mm}(r)$ of a polymer solution.  The CM

238: distribution function $g(r)$ required to extract the effective pair

239: potential $v_2(r)$ may be related to $g_{mm}(r)$ by an approximate,

240: but accurate relation involving internal form factors of a single

241: coil\cite{krak3}.  Further progress along these lines might eventually

242: bypass the need for time-consuming simulations of full monomer level

243: models required to determine $g(r)$.  \\ The equation of state may be

244: computed as a function of $\rho/\rho^*$ and $\beta^*$, using a

245: somewhat cumbersome method based on the contact

246: theorem\cite{dick}\cite{add}, or much more efficiently by subjecting

247: the polymers to a gravitational field and invoking hydrostatic

248: equilibrium\cite{add2}.  If $\rho(z)$ denotes the CM(or monomer)

249: density profile of the polymers in a vertical field, which is easily

250: measured in simulations, the osmotic pressure at an altitude $z$ is

251: simply

252: \begin{eqnarray}

253: \label{eq11}

254: \beta P(z)= \frac{1}{\zeta}\int_z^\infty \rho(z')dz'

255: \end{eqnarray}

256: where $\zeta=k_BT/Mg$ is the gravitational length, which must be

257: chosen (by tuning the product $Mg$) significantly larger than $R_g$

258: for the macroscopic description (which follows from the local density

259: approximation within density functional theory of inhomogeneous

260: fluids) to hold\cite{barrat}.  Elimination of the altitude $z$ between

261: $P(z)$ and $\rho(z)$ then leads to the bulk equation of state

262: $P(\rho)$. Examples from simulations of L=500 chains are shown, for

263: four temperatures in figure 1.

264: \begin{figure}[!htp]

265: \begin{center}

266: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{fig1.eps}.

267: \caption{Equation of state on a log-log scale, calculated using Dickman's(contact theorem) method, (symbols) and hydrostatic equilibrium(solid lines).}

268: \label{fig1}

269: \end{center}

270: \end{figure}

271: \section{Long polymers: corrections to scaling}

272: Polymers are critical objects in the universality class of the zero

273: component(n=0) limit of the n-vector model of critical

274: phenomena\cite{genne}.  The $L\rightarrow \infty$ limit is equivalent

275: to the limit of divergent correlation length $\xi$ at the critical

276: point of a second-order phase transition.  The properties of very long

277: chains can hence be investigated using the powerful method of the

278: renormalization group (RG) and field theory\cite{freed}.  These

279: predict two scaling regimes, an athermal one corresponding to the good

280: solvent (SAW) limit, and the second corresponding to the

281: $\theta$-solvent regime where ideal polymer statistics hold.  The

282: cross-over between the two regimes is discontinuous in the scaling

283: limit $L \rightarrow \infty$.  The objective is to predict the

284: behaviour for large but finite L from a finite size scaling analysis

285: of MC data\cite{li}\cite{pelis}.  We restrict the discussion to the

286: good solvent regime.  For $\beta<\beta_\theta$ any universal

287: (dimensionless) ratio $R$ may be represented as

288: \begin{eqnarray}

289: \label{eq12}

290: R(L,\beta)=R^* +\frac{a_R(\beta)}{L^\Delta} + ...

291: \end{eqnarray}

292: where $R^*$ is the temperature independent scaling limit

293: ($L\rightarrow \infty$) and the exponent $\Delta=0.517$\cite{beloh}.

294: Higher order terms involve exponents of the order of 1 or larger.  The

295: temperature-dependent coefficient $a_R(\beta)$ is non-universal, but

296: ratios of such coefficients for two different dimensionless qualities

297: are again universal, {\it i.e.} model-independent.  A much studied

298: example of a universal ratio is

299: $A_2(L,\beta)=B_2(L,\beta)/R^3_g(L,\beta)$.  A similar ratio involving

300: the third virial coefficient

301: $A_3(L,\beta)=B_3(L,\beta)/R^6_g(L,\beta)$ has been examined in detail

302: in reference\cite{pelis}.  $B_3$ is found to be always positive, but

303: to go through a sharp minimum near $T=T_\theta$.  The effective pair

304: potential between the CMs of two isolated polymers ($\rho \ll \rho^*$

305: limit), divided by $k_BT$, is another universal ratio, which has been investigated by a similar scaling analysis in \cite{pelis}:

306: \begin{eqnarray}

307: \label{eq13}

308: \beta v_2(r,L,\beta)=v_\infty(x) +\frac{a_v(\beta)}{L^\Delta}v_c(x)  + ...

309: \end{eqnarray}

310: where $x=r/R_g$.  $v_\infty$, $v_c$ and $a_v(\beta)$ are extracted

311: from a careful analysis of MC data for several lengths L and inverse

312: temperatures $0 \leq \beta < \beta_\theta$.  These may then be used to

313: predict $\beta v_2$ for any length and temperature, and agreement with

314: MC data is excellent for $\beta^* \leq 0.2$ and $L\geq 500$.  Closer

315: to the $\theta$-temperature the convergence of (\ref{eq13}) with L is

316: found, not surprisingly, to be much slower, and one must then switch

317: to the scaling analysis appropriate for the $\theta$-regime.  The

318: scaling analysis has been recently extended to binary mixtures of

319: polymers of different lengths and to star polymers\cite{pelis3}

320: 

321: \section{Soft polymers and hard colloids}

322: Mixtures of colloidal particles and non-adsorbing polymers have

323: attracted considerable experimental and theoretical attention over the

324: last two decades, because of interesting phase behaviour induced by

325: the familiar depletion mechanism\cite{asaku}.  The effective depletion

326: interaction between spherical colloidal particles may be tuned by

327: varying the size ration $q=R_g/R_c$ (where $R_c$ is the colloid

328: radius), and the polymer concentration $\rho$.  Consider first

329: the case of polymers between 2 plates($q=0$) separated by z.  The

330: depletion potential per unit area $W(z)$ is defined by the difference

331: in polymer grand potentials:

332: \begin{eqnarray}

333: \label{eq14}

334: W(z)&=\frac{1}{A}[\Omega(z)-\Omega(z=\infty)]\\

335: &=\int_z^\infty[P(z')-P(z=\infty)]dz'

336: \end{eqnarray}

337: Clearly since at contact 2 depletion zones are destroyed

338: $W(z=\infty)=-2\gamma_W(\rho)$, where $\gamma_W$ is the polymer -wall

339: surface tension.  The simple ansatz: 

340: \begin{eqnarray}

341: \label{eq15}

342: W(z)&=W(0) + P(\rho)z  &\;\;\;\;\;\; ; z<D_w(\rho)=-\frac{W(0)}{P(\rho)}\\

343: &    =0 &               \;\;\;\;\;\; ; z>D_w(\rho)

344: \end{eqnarray}

345: reproduces direct simulation data well.  The result for SAW

346: polymers\cite{louis3} differs considerably from that for ideal

347: polymers\cite{asaku}: the range $D_W$ is shorter for interacting

348: polymers, and decreases with increasing density, while it is

349: independent of density for ideal polymers; the contact value $W(0)$

350: decreases faster with $\rho$ for interacting polymers since the

351: surface tension scales as $\rho^{3/2}$ in the semi-dilute

352: regime\cite{louis4} while it scales as $\rho$ for ideal polymers.  For

353: finite $q\leq 1$, the depletion force between two spheres can be

354: approximately related to the depletion potential between 2 planes via

355: the Derjaguin approximation, and by correcting for the decreasing

356: range of the force due to partial wrapping of the polymer coils around

357: the spherical colloid\cite{louis3}.\\ Such pair depletion interactions

358: do not, however, account for effective many-body interactions due to

359: finite colloid concentrations.  To that purpose the coarse-graining

360: strategy described in sections 1 to 3 may be extended to the two

361: component colloid-polymer system.  An effective state-dependent

362: colloid-polymer pair interaction $v_{cp}(r)$ may be extracted by an

363: HNC inversion of the polymer density profile around a

364: sphere\cite{bolh}\cite{bolh3}\cite{louis3}, similar to the inversion

365: procedure used to determine the effective polymer-polymer pair

366: potential $v_{pp}(r)$.  The colloid-colloid pair potential $v_{cc}(r)$

367: is well approximated by a simple hard sphere interaction.  MC

368: simulations of this effective two-component system were used to

369: calculate the phase diagram of the mixture for $q \leq 1$

370: \cite{bolh4}.  The calculated binodal agrees very well with

371: experimental data\cite{rama} for interacting polymers. Significant

372: qualitative differences arise between phase diagrams for

373: ideal\cite{lekker} and interacting polymers, particularly for larger

374: $q$:  the range of the concentrated (``liquid'') colloidal phase in

375: the colloid density-polymer density plane is considerably reduced when

376: polymer interactions are included, and the critical point occurs at

377: significantly higher packing fraction of the two species\cite{bolh4}.

378: These trends become more pronounced in the ``protein limit'' of large

379: polymers and small colloids ($q\gg 1$)\cite{bolh5}.  Solvent quality

380: has a strong influence on the induced depletion interaction between

381: colloids, with polymers under $\theta$ conditions leading, not

382: surprisingly to a pair interaction close (but not identical) to that

383: induced by ideal polymers\cite{add}, at least for $\rho/\rho*<1$.

384: 

385: \section{Diblock copolymers and beyond}

386: The coarse-graining strategy may be extended to polymers other than

387: linear homopolymers considered so far.  Star polymers, for instance,

388: have been investigated along similar lines\cite{likos}; the CM is

389: replaced by the midpoint where the $f$ arms of a star polymer meet;

390: the resulting effective pair interaction diverges logarithmically as

391: $r\rightarrow0$ and hardens as $f$ increases. \\ The case of symmetric

392: diblock copolymers AB has been examined very recently\cite{add3}.  The

393: A and B strands are represented as soft ``blobs'', the CMs of which

394: are tethered by an ``entropic spring'' characterised by the

395: intramolecular potential $\phi_{AB}(r)$ which is derived from the

396: MC-generated distribution function of relative distances of the A and

397: B CMs on the same copolymer.  There are now three intermolecular CM

398: potentials $v_{AA}(r)$, $v_{BB}(r)$ $v_{AB}(r)$, in addition to the

399: intramolecular potential.  The inversion procedure to go from the

400: partial distribution functions $g_{\alpha \beta}(r)$ to the pair

401: potentials $v_{\alpha \beta}(r)$ is now more involved\cite{add3}.

402: Even in the low density limit one already faces a four-body problem.

403: The inversion procedure has been carried out in that limit for a

404: simple athermal model, the ISI model, where A-A and B-B pairs behave

405: like ideal polymers, {\it i.e.} freely interpenetrate, while A-B pairs

406: behave like mutually avoiding walks. This is the block copolymer

407: equivalent of the familiar Widom-Rowlinson model\cite{widom} which

408: drives phase separation of simple atomic fluids (where A and B are

409: untethered).  Because the two strands of the AB block copolymer system

410: are tethered, macroscopic phase separation due to A-B incompatibility

411: is suppressed and reduces to microphase separation: the symmetric

412: block copolymers form a lammelar phase, which was indeed observed in

413: MC simulations of both the full monomeric and the coarse-grained

414: representations\cite{add3}.  The resulting equation of state calculated

415: by the hydrostatic equilibrium method is shown in Figure 2.

416: \begin{figure}[!htp]

417: \begin{center}

418: \includegraphics[width=8cm,angle=0]{fig2.eps}

419: \caption{Equation of state generated from MC simulations for diblock copolymers

420: using full monomer level and coarse-grained ``blob'' models.}

421: \label{fig2}

422: \end{center}

423: \end{figure}

424: $Z=\beta P/\rho$ is seen to first increase linearly up to

425: $\rho/\rho^*\approx2$, where it flattens out, and thereafter decreases

426: slowly to give an asymptotic value $>1$.  This may be understood by

427: noting that in the lamellar phase(which develops for $\rho/\rho^*>2$),

428: the repulsive A-B contacts are greatly reduced.  Figure 2 also shows

429: the equation of state calculated (with much less computational effort)

430: for the coarse-grained ``soft-dumbbell'' model with effective intra

431: and inter-molecular pair potentials $\phi_{AB}(r)$ and $v_{\alpha

432: \beta}(r)$ determined in the zero density limit.  The agreement is

433: excellent up to $\rho\approx\rho^*$, and remains semi-quantitative

434: thereafter, despite the fact that the density dependence of the

435: effective potential has not been taken into account.

436: 

437: The ``soft dumbbell'' representation of diblock copolymers provides a

438: hint of how to extend the coarse-graining strategy of linear homo or

439: hetropolymers over a wide range of polymer concentrations.  As the

440: ratio $\rho/\rho^*$ increases, the fundamental length scale gradually

441: crosses over from $R_g$ (for $\rho/\rho^*<1$) to the correlation

442: length $\xi \sim \rho^{-3/4}$ deep in the semi-dilute regime, to the

443: segment length $b$ in the melt.  The coarse-graining strategy put

444: forward in this paper applies to dilute and initial semi-dilute

445: regime, where polymer coils are well represented by a single

446: ``soft-core'' particle with a radius of the order $R_g$.  Deeper into

447: the semi-dilute regime, the blob picture\cite{genne2} applies for

448: polymers confined by other polymers or in a pore; each polymer reduces

449: to a ``necklace'' of blobs of radius $\xi$, tethered by entropic

450: springs; different blobs on the same or neighbouring chains interact

451: via a quasi-gaussian soft-core potential, as introduced in earlier

452: sections.  The radius of each blob decreases, and hence their number

453: increases (for a given overall length L) as the ratio $\rho/\rho^*$

454: increases, until the melt regime is reached where the blob size

455: reduces essentially to the segment length $b$, and the coarse-graining

456: strategy is no longer of any use. Over the whole semi-dilute regime a

457: polymer may thus be pictured as a necklace of blobs, and the present

458: coarse-graining strategy allows, in principle for an unequivocal

459: determination of intra and inter-molecular effective interactions

460: between these blobs.  Work along these lines is in progress.

461: 

462: \section{Acknowledgements}

463: The authors are grateful to their collaborators on this project over

464: the years; the work presented in this overview owes much to Peter

465: Bolhuis, Andrea Pelissetto, Vincent Krakoviack, Reimar Finken,

466: Evert-Jan Meijer and Benjamin Rotenberg.  CIA acknowledges the support

467: of the EPSRC and AAL is grateful to the Royal Society of London for their support. 

468: 

469: \section{References}

470: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

471: \bibitem{flory} P.J. Flory and W.R. Krigbaum, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 18}, 1086 (1950)

472: \bibitem{gros} A.V. Grosberg, P.G. Khalatur and A.R. Khokhlov, {\it Macromol.Chem.RapidCommun.} {\bf 3}, 709 (1982)

473: \bibitem{daut} J. Dautenhahn and C.K. Hall, {\it Macromolecules} {\bf 27}, 5399 (1994)

474: \bibitem{bolh} P.G. Bolhuis, A.A. Louis, J.-P. Hansen and E.J. Meijer {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 114}, 4296 (2001)

475: \bibitem{pelis} A. Pelissetto and J.-P. Hansen, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 112}, 134904 (2005)

476: \bibitem{bolh2} P.G. Bolhuis, A.A. Louis and J.-P. Hansen, {\it Phys.Rev.E} {\bf 64}, 021801 (2001)

477: \bibitem{louis} A.A. Louis, P.G. Bolhuis, J.-P. Hansen and E.J. Meijer, {\it Phys.Rev.Letters} {\bf 85}, 2522 (2000)

478: \bibitem{hend} R.L. Henderson, {\it Phys.Lett.A} {\bf 49}, 197 (1974)

479: \bibitem{hansen} J.-P. Hansen and I.R. McDonald, ``Theory of Simple Liquids'' $2^{nd}$ ed, (Academic Press, London, 1986)

480: \bibitem{rubin} see {\it e.g.} M. Rubinstein and R.H. Colby, ``Polymer Physics'', (Oxford University Press, 2003)

481: \bibitem{bolh3} P.G. Bolhuis and A.A. Louis, {\it Macromolecules} {\bf 35}, 1860 (2002)

482: \bibitem{louis5} A.A. Louis,  {\it J. Phys.Cond.Matt} {\bf 14} 9187 (2002)  

483: \bibitem{stil} F.H. Stillinger, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 65}, 3968  (1976)

484: \bibitem{lang} A. Lang, C.N. Likos, M Watzlawek and H. L\"owen, {\it J.Phys.Cond.Matt} {\bf 12}, 5087 (2000)

485: \bibitem{louis2} A.A. Louis, P.G. Bolhuis and J.-P. Hansen, {\it Phys.Rev.E} {\bf 62}, 7961 (2000)

486: \bibitem{finken} R. Finken, J.-P. Hansen and A.A. Louis, {\it J.Phys.A} {\bf 37}, 577 (2004)

487: \bibitem{grass} P. Grassberger and R. Hegger, {\it J. Chem. Phys.} {\bf 102}, 6881 (1995)

488: \bibitem{krak} V. Krakoviack, J.-P. Hansen, and A.A. Louis, {\it Phys.Rev.E} {\bf 67}, 041801 (2003)

489: \bibitem{ruel} D. Ruelle ``Statistical Mechanics: Rigorous Results'', (Benjamin, London, 1969)

490: \bibitem{schw} For a review see K.S. Schweizer and J.G. Curro, {\it Adv.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 97}, 1 (1997)

491: \bibitem{fuchs} M. Fuchs and K.S. Schweizer, {\it Phys.Rev.E} {\bf 64}, 021514  (2001)

492: \bibitem{krak2} V. Krakoviack, B. Rotenburg and J.-P. Hansen {\it J.Phys.Chem.B} {\bf 108}, 6697 (2004)

493: \bibitem{krak3} V. Krakoviack, J.-P. Hansen, and A.A. Louis, {\it Europhys.Lett.} {\bf 58}, 53 (2002)

494: \bibitem{dick} R. Dickman, {\it J. Chem. Phys.} {\bf 87}, 2246 (1987)

495: \bibitem{add} C.I. Addison, A.A. Louis and J.-P. Hansen, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 121}, 612 (2004)

496: \bibitem{add2} C.I. Addison, J.-P. Hansen and A.A. Louis, {\it Chem.Phys.Chem.} (in press 2005)

497: \bibitem{barrat} J.-L. Barrat, T. Biben and J.-P. Hansen, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 102}, 6881 (1995)

498: \bibitem{genne} P.G. de Gennes, {\it Phys.Lett} {\bf 38A}, 339 (1972)

499: \bibitem{freed} see {\it e.g.} K.F. Freed, ``Renormalization Group Theory of Macromolecules'',  (Wiley, New York, 1987)

500: \bibitem{li} B. Li, N. Madras and A.D. Sokal, {\it J.Stat.Phys.} {\bf 80}, 661 (1995)

501: \bibitem{beloh} P. Belohorec and B. Nickel, Guelph University Report (1997) (unpublished)

502: \bibitem{pelis3} A. Pelissetto, {\it Private communication}

503: \bibitem{asaku} S. Asakura and F. Oosawa, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 22}, 1255 (1954)

504: \bibitem{louis3} A.A. Louis, P.G. Bolhuis, E.J. Meijer and J.-P. Hansen, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 117}, 1893 (2002)

505: \bibitem{louis4} A.A. Louis, P.G. Bolhuis, E.J. Meijer and J.-P. Hansen, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 116}, 10547 (2002)

506: \bibitem{bolh4} P.G. Bolhuis, A.A. Louis and J.-P. Hansen, {\it Phys.Rev.Lett} {\bf 89}, 128302 (2002) 

507: \bibitem{lekker} H.N.W. Lekkerkerker {\it et al.}, {\it Europhys.Lett} {\bf 20}, 559 (1992); E.J. Meijer and D. Frenkel, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 100}, 6873 (1994)

508: \bibitem{rama} S. Ramakrishman, M. Fuchs, K.S. Schweizer and C.F. Zukoski, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 116}, 2201 (2002)

509: \bibitem{bolh5} P.G. Bolhuis, E.J. Meijer and A.A. Louis, {\it Phys.Rev.Lett} {\bf 90}, 068304 (2003)

510: \bibitem{likos} For a review, see C.N. Likos, {\it Phys.Rep} {\bf 348}, 267 (2001)

511: \bibitem{add3} C.I. Addison, J.-P. Hansen, V. Krakoviack and A.A. Louis, {\it Mol.Phys.} (in press 2005)

512: \bibitem{widom} B. Widom and J.S. Rowlinson, {\it J.Chem.Phys.} {\bf 52}, 1670 (1970)

513: \bibitem{genne2} P.G. de Gennes, "Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics" (Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1979)

514: 

515: \end{thebibliography}

516:  

517: \end{document}

518: 

519: