1: %{\mbox{\boldmath ${\bf \sigma}$}}
2: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,showpacs,superscriptaddress,
4: %floatfix]{revtex4}
5: \documentclass[prb,aps,showpacs,superscriptaddress, floatfix]{revtex4}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7: \usepackage{bm}
8: \usepackage{amsmath}
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{Self-trapping phenomenon in (2+1)-dimensional quantum
11: electrodynamics and its application to high-T$_c$ cuprates with N{\'
12: e}el ordering}
13: \author{T. Morinari}
14: \affiliation{Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto
15: University Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
16: \date{\today}
17: \begin{abstract}
18: The strong coupling effect in the (2+1)-dimensional quantum
19: electrodynamics (QED$_3$) description of the $S=1/2$ Heisenberg
20: antiferromagnet is studied in terms of a canonical transformation
21: which has been used in the small polaron theory in electron-phonon
22: systems.
23: In the N{\' e}el ordered phase, we show that the Dirac fermions are
24: localized and the spectral function is of the Gaussian form due to the
25: coupling to the longitudinal gauge field.
26: The width of the broad line shape is $\sim 3J$ with $J$
27: the superexchange interaction energy and the localization length is
28: $\sim 2a$, with $a$ the lattice constant.
29: \end{abstract}
30: %\pacs{Valid PACS appear here.
31: %{\tt$\backslash$\string pacs\{\}} should always be input, even if
32: %empty.}
33: %\pacs{75.25.+z,74.72.-h}
34:
35: %\begin{multicols}{2}
36:
37: %\narrowtext
38:
39: \maketitle
40:
41: \section{Introduction}
42: %ARPES on parent compound
43: One of the most fundamental question in the physics of
44: high-$T_c$ cuprates is about the description of the doped holes.
45: The simplest situation would be realized in the single hole doped
46: system.
47: Experimentally, angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) in
48: the undoped compounds provides us valuable information about the
49: nature of the excitations.
50: The excitation spectrum was obtained by Wells {\it et
51: al.}\cite{WELLS_ETAL,RONNING_ETAL,SHEN_RMP}
52: It was found that the band width is $\sim 2.2J\simeq 270{\rm meV}$
53: where $J$ is the superexchange interaction between the copper site
54: spins.
55: This band width is much smaller than
56: the tight-binding value of $8t\simeq 2.8{\rm eV}$
57: which is determined by the transfer
58: integral parameter, $t$.
59: Furthermore, the observed spectra exhibit a quite broad feature.
60: In Ref.\cite{SHEN_ETAL}, it is shown that the spectra do not have a
61: conventional Lorentzian form.
62: The spectra rather have a Gaussian form.
63: These observations suggest
64: that the quasiparticle excitations observed in the undoped
65: cuprates are quite different from conventional Fermi liquid
66: quasiparticles.
67:
68: %quasiparticle? boson mode?
69: In order to understand ARPES experiments in the undoped compounds,
70: first we need to figure out the elementary excitation whose excitation
71: spectrum obeys the dispersion observed experimentally.
72: The next step is to consider a mechanism of spectral shape broadening
73: that would arise from coupling to a boson mode.
74: %t-J model
75: Concerning the first point, it was shown that the slave-fermion
76: approach to the t-t'-t''-J model reproduces the dispersion.
77: \cite{BOZ95,tttJ}
78: (It is known that the simple t-J model fails to reproduce
79: the dispersion along $(\pi,0)$ to $(0,\pi)$.\cite{TJ_fail,TJ_fail2})
80: However, it has been shown\cite{BOZ95} that the coupling to
81: antiferromagnetic spin-wave modes does not lead to a broad line shape.
82: Recently Mischenko and Nagaosa\cite{MN04}
83: considered a coupling to an optical phonon.
84: They numerically summed over Feynman diagrams including vertex
85: corrections for phonons.
86: It was argued that the quasiparticle in the t-J model is in the strong
87: coupling regime that leads to a broad line shape.
88:
89:
90: In this paper, we consider another possibility.
91: We consider the quasiparticles in the $\pi$-flux phase
92: \cite{AFFLECK_MARSTON} and the
93: effect of coupling to U(1) gauge field fluctuations.
94: A similar problem within the slave-fermion approach to the t-J model
95: was discussed by Auerbach and Larson.\cite{AL91}
96: It was argued that the single hole forms a small polaron due to the
97: coupling to the gauge field.
98: Here we consider a similar problem based on the $\pi$-flux phase with
99: dynamically induced mass.
100: The $\pi$-flux phase was proposed by Affleck and
101: Marston\cite{AFFLECK_MARSTON} from a mean
102: field theory of the $S=1/2$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model
103: based on a fermionic representation of the spin $S=1/2$.
104: Fluctuations about the state can be described by a U(1) gauge field.
105: The dispersion of the quasiparticle in the $\pi$-flux phase is in good
106: agreement with the experimentally obtained
107: dispersion as argued by Laughlin.\cite{LAUGHLIN97}
108: The effective theory is described by quantum electrodynamics in
109: (2+1)-dimension, which is called QED$_3$.\cite{MARSTON,KIM_LEE}
110:
111:
112: Although the $\pi$-flux phase is different from the N{\' e}el ordering
113: phase, believed to describe the N{\' e}el ordering
114: state\cite{MARSTON,KIM_LEE} is the state that includes the dynamically
115: induced mass term due to the coupling to the gauge field.
116: The excitation spectra near $(\pm \pi/2,\pm \pi/2)$ are given by a
117: massive Dirac fermion.
118: Experimentally the Dirac fermion mass is estimated to be $\sim
119: 1.3J$\cite{RONNING_ETALUN} by fitting the experimentally obtained
120: dispersion with the quasiparticle dispersion in the $\pi$-flux phase
121: with the mass term.
122:
123:
124: Meanwhile Franz and Te\u{s}anovi\'{c} proposed \cite{TF01}
125: a QED$_3$ theory starting from the d-wave superconducting
126: state.\cite{BFN99}
127: The dynamical mass generation, or the spontaneous chiral symmetry
128: breaking, is also associated with antiferromagnetic
129: order.\cite{HERBUT}
130: Aitchison and Mavromatos\cite{AM96} argued that the gauge-fermion
131: interaction in QED$_3$ leads to non-Fermi liquid behavior.
132: Rantner and Wen\cite{RW,KHVESHCHENKO} discussed changes of line shapes
133: between the
134: normal state and the superconducting state based on a flux phase
135: obtained in the SU(2) slave-boson approach to the t-J
136: model\cite{WEN_LEE} with QED$_3$ for
137: the description of the spinons.
138:
139:
140:
141:
142: %N{\' e}el vs Disordered
143: In the N{\' e}el ordered phase, there is strong logarithmic potential
144: between the Dirac fermions.
145: In fact, there is no low-lying spin $1/2$
146: excitations \cite{RS90,CHUBUKOV}
147: because of the confinement associated with this strong
148: interaction.\cite{QED3_confinement}
149: Therefore, in the N{\' e}el phase we need to perform a
150: non-perturbative analysis.
151:
152:
153:
154: %In this paper
155: In this paper, we apply to the QED$_3$ a canonical transformation,
156: which has been extensively studied in the electron-phonon systems,
157: \cite{MAHAN}
158: for the effect of the longitudinal gauge field interaction on the
159: massive Dirac fermion.
160: We show that the coupling to the longitudinal gauge field leads to the
161: localization of the Dirac fermions and the spectral function is
162: approximately given by a Gaussian form.
163: The main assumption here is that a doped hole excite a quasiparticle
164: in the $\pi$-flux state.
165: One way to interpret this is to consider the slave-boson approach to
166: the t-J model.
167: Another way is proposed in Ref.\cite{TM05} where a half-skyrmion spin
168: texture is created by doped holes.
169: The excitation spectrum of the half-skyrmion spin texture is the same
170: as that of the $\pi$-flux phase.
171: The mass term of the quasiparticles in the $\pi$-flux state is the
172: excitation gap of the half-skyrmion spin texture.
173: The effective action of the half-skyrmion spin textures is shown to be
174: described by QED$_3$ by applying a duality mapping.\cite{TM05}
175:
176:
177: The rest of the paper is organized as follows.
178: In Sec.\ref{sec_model}, we describe the QED$_3$ action and the
179: application of the canonical transformation.
180: In Sec.\ref{sec_green}, we calculate the retarded Green's function of
181: the massive Dirac fermion.
182: Section \ref{sec_conclusion} is devoted to the conclusion.
183:
184:
185: \section{Model}
186: \label{sec_model}
187: %\subsection{QED$_3$ action}
188: In the continuum, the QED$_3$ action for the $S=1/2$
189: quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet \cite{MARSTON,KIM_LEE}
190: is written as
191: \begin{eqnarray}
192: S &=& \int d^3 x {\overline \psi} \left( x \right)
193: \left( {i\gamma ^\mu D_\mu - mc_{\rm sw}\sigma_3 } \right)
194: \psi \left( x \right)
195: - \frac{1}{4e_A^2}\int d^3 x F_{\mu \nu } F^{\mu \nu }
196: \nonumber \\
197: &=& S_0 + S_{\rm int} + S_A,
198: \label{eq_qed3}
199: \end{eqnarray}
200: where $D_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} + iA_{\mu}$ is the covariant
201: derivative.
202: (The derivation of the action in the $\pi$-flux phase is given in
203: appendix~\ref{sec_qed3}.)
204: The Dirac fermion fields describe the quasiparticles in the spin
205: system.
206: In the absence of the doped holes, the ground state is that all the
207: negative energy states of the Dirac fermions are occupied.
208: While the positive energy states are empty.
209: Upon hole doping, hole states are created in the band of the negative
210: energy states.
211: In writing down the action, we have assumed that there is
212: the N{\'e}el ordering.
213: In the presence of the N{\' e}el ordering,
214: the mass $m$ is nonzero.\cite{MARSTON,KIM_LEE}
215: The dynamics of the gauge field arises from the fermion polarization.
216: \cite{KIM_LEE}
217: Due to the mass term the gauge field action takes the form of the
218: Maxwell action.
219: The gauge charge $e_A$ is related to $m$ through
220: $e_A^2 = 3\pi m c_{sw}$.\cite{KIM_LEE}
221: %Note that the mass term is parity conserving.\cite{parity}
222:
223:
224: For static particles, the scalar potential $\phi \equiv A_0/e_A$
225: is calculated by the following equation:
226: \begin{equation}
227: \nabla^2 \phi ({\bf r})= -e_A \rho ({\bf r}),
228: \end{equation}
229: where $\rho ({\bf r})$ represents the charge density.
230: The potential between a particle and hole is
231: given by
232: \begin{equation}
233: V(r)=-\frac{e_A^2}{2\pi} \ln \frac{r}{r_0}.
234: \end{equation}
235: Here $r_0$ is the short distance cutoff scale which is on the order of
236: the lattice constant.
237: Note that the potential $V(r)$ has a form of a logarithmically
238: confining potential.
239:
240:
241: We consider the effect of the scalar potential on a dynamical hole.
242: In solid state physics, the Coulomb gauge is often used for the
243: analysis of the electromagnetic gauge field.
244: In the Coulomb gauge, the interaction mediated by the scalar potential
245: is instantaneous in time.
246: While in the Lorentz gauge, the retardation effect in
247: the interaction is explicit.
248: For the electromagnetic gauge field, the speed of light $c$ is much
249: faster than vectors of excitations in the sample.
250: Therefore, the retardation effect is negligible.
251: However, for the QED$_3$ theory of (\ref{eq_qed3}), the speed of the
252: gauge field propagation is $c_{\rm sw}$ that is much smaller than $c$.
253: The retardation effect can play an important role.
254: To include this effect, we take the Lorentz gauge.
255: In the Lorentz gauge,
256: the action of the gauge field is
257: \begin{equation}
258: S_A = \frac{c_{\rm sw}}{2e_A^2}
259: \int dt \int d^2 {\bf r}
260: \sum_{\mu=0,1,2}
261: \left[ \frac{1}{c_{\rm sw}^2}
262: \left( \partial_t A_{\mu} \right)^2
263: - \left( \partial_x A_{\mu} \right)^2
264: - \left( \partial_y A_{\mu} \right)^2 \right].
265: \end{equation}
266: The vector potential obeys the following equation,
267: \begin{equation}
268: \frac{1}{c_{sw}^2} \partial_t^2 {\bf A} - \partial_x^2 {\bf A}
269: - \partial_y^2 {\bf A} = -{\bf j}.
270: \end{equation}
271: Note that the equation for the longitudinal component of the vector
272: potential is derived from the equation for the scalar potential
273: in the Lorentz gauge.
274: Therefore, the independent degrees of freedom are
275: the transverse component of the vector potential and
276: the scalar potential.
277: The Hamiltonian for the gauge field is
278: \begin{equation}
279: H_A
280: = \frac12 \sum_{q,\mu=0,t}
281: \omega_q \left( a_{q\mu}^{\dagger} a_{q\mu}
282: + a_{q\mu} a_{q\mu}^{\dagger} \right),
283: \end{equation}
284: where $\omega_q=c_{\rm sw} q$ in the continuum and
285: we have introduced creation and annihilation operators through
286: $A_{q\mu} = \sqrt{
287: %\frac{e_A^2 c_{\rm sw}}{2\omega_q}
288: e_A^2 c_{\rm sw}/(2\omega_q)
289: }
290: \left(
291: a_{-q,\mu}^{\dagger} + a_{q\mu}
292: \right)$.
293: Here $\mu=t$ denotes the transverse component of the vector potential.
294:
295:
296: %\subsection{QED$_3$ action on the square lattice}
297: %discretization
298: On the square lattice, the action $S_0+S_{\rm int}$
299: has the following form\cite{KOGUT83}
300: \begin{eqnarray}
301: S_0 + S_{\rm int} &=&
302: \int dt~ a^2
303: \sum_j
304: \left\{
305: {\overline \psi}_j \left( t \right)
306: i\gamma^0
307: %\left[ {\partial _t + iA_t(j) } \right]
308: \partial_t
309: \psi _j \left( t \right)
310: -\overline{\psi}_j(t) c_{\rm sw} \gamma^0 A_0(j,t) \psi_j(t)
311: - mc_{sw}^2
312: \overline \psi _j \left( t \right)
313: \sigma_3
314: \psi _j \left( t \right)
315: \right. \nonumber \\
316: & & \left.
317: - \frac{{c_{sw} }}{{2a}}
318: {\overline \psi}_j \left( t \right)
319: i\gamma^1
320: \left[ {e^{iaA_1 \left( j+a{\hat e}_1/2,t \right)}
321: \psi_{j + a{\hat e}_1 } \left( t \right)
322: - e^{ - iaA_1 \left( j -a{\hat e}_1/2,t\right)}
323: \psi_{j - a{\hat e}_1}
324: \left( t \right)} \right]
325: \right. \nonumber \\
326: & & \left.
327: -
328: \frac{{c_{sw} }}{{2a}}
329: {\overline \psi}_j \left( t \right)
330: i\gamma^2
331: \left[ {e^{iaA_2 \left( j +a{\hat e}_2/2,t\right)}
332: \psi_{j + a{\hat e}_2 } \left( t \right)
333: - e^{ - iaA_2 \left( j-a{\hat e}_2/2,t \right)}
334: \psi_{j - a{\hat e}_2} \left( t \right)}
335: \right]
336: \right\}.
337: \label{eq_s0si}
338: \end{eqnarray}
339: %Interaction term
340: The above action contains the gauge field interactions arising from
341: both the transverse part and the longitudinal part of the gauge field.
342: The transverse component of the vector potential is important for the
343: calculation of the quasiparticle lifetime.
344: Because the scattering process associated with the transverse
345: component is due to emissions or absorptions of the propagating gauge
346: fields, or ``photons.''
347: As demonstrated in Refs.\cite{Nagaosa_Lee,Ioffe_Wiegmann},
348: the coupling to the transverse vector potential leads to a $T$-linear
349: resistivity law.
350: However, the interaction of the holes with the transverse vector
351: potential does not creat a trapping potential, and
352: is described by a self-energy effect.
353: Therefore, the spectrum has the form of Lorentzian which is
354: inconsistent with the ARPES experiments in the undoped compounds.
355: Here we focus on the self-trapping phenomenon associated with the
356: scalar potential, and neglect the transverse component of the vector
357: potential:
358: \begin{eqnarray}
359: H_{\rm int} &=& c_{\rm sw} a^2
360: \sum_{j}
361: \overline \psi _j \gamma^0 A_0(j)
362: \psi _j
363: \nonumber \\
364: &=& \frac{c_{\rm sw} a^2}{\sqrt{\Omega}}
365: \sum_j \sum_{\bf q}
366: {\psi}_j^{\dagger}\psi_j
367: {\rm e}^{i{\bf q}\cdot {\bf R}_j }
368: A_{{\bf q}}.
369: \end{eqnarray}
370:
371:
372:
373: %\subsection{Canonical transformation}
374: The interaction $H_{\rm int}$ contains the terms that contribute to
375: the infrared (IR) behavior of QED$_3$\cite{IR,SD,KHVESHCHENKO} and the
376: other terms.
377: As is well-known in QED$_3$, the dynamical mass generation is
378: associated with the IR behavior.\cite{IR_mass}
379: For the analysis, we need a non-perturbative scheme, such as a $1/N$
380: expansion with $N$ the number of Dirac fermion species.
381: For discussion of the dynamical mass generation, the Schwinger-Dyson
382: equation has been studied.\cite{SD}
383: In the analysis of the Schwinger-Dyson equation, it is necessary
384: to figure out the form of the vertex part.
385: For the IR region, one needs to properly choose the form of the vertex
386: part for the discussion of the dynamical mass generation.
387: While for the other region, the bare vertex form is known to be
388: sufficient for the analysis of the system.\cite{KN}
389: Here we are interested in the interaction with the momentum
390: which is not in the IR regime.
391: The IR behavior of the system is understood to be associated with the
392: mass generation.
393: Therefore, we introduce an IR cut off $q_0$, which is much smaller
394: than the ultraviolet cut off $\Lambda\sim \pi/a$,
395: in the following calculations.
396:
397:
398: We consider a canonical transformation:\cite{MAHAN}
399: \begin{equation}
400: \overline{H}=\exp(s) H \exp(-s),
401: \label{eq_canonical}
402: \end{equation}
403: where
404: \begin{equation}
405: s=\sum_{q} \frac{M_{q}}{\omega_q}
406: \left( a^{\dagger}_{-q} - a_{q} \right),
407: \end{equation}
408: with $a_q^{\dagger}=a^{\dagger}_{q0}$ and
409: $a_q=a_{q0}$, and
410: \begin{equation}
411: M_{q}=\frac{a^2}{\sqrt{\Omega}}
412: \sum_j
413: \sqrt{\frac{e_A^2 c_{\rm sw}^3}{2\omega_q}}
414: {\psi}_j^{\dagger} \psi_j
415: \exp (i{\bf q}\cdot {\bf R}_j ).
416: \end{equation}
417: The bare vertex is used here as discussed above.
418: Hereafter the summation in the momentum space concerning the gauge
419: fields is to be performed for $q_0<|{\bf q}|<\Lambda$.
420:
421:
422: Using the following result,
423: \begin{equation}
424: \left[ s,\psi_j \right]
425: = -\frac{a^2 e_A}{\sqrt{2\Omega}}
426: \sum_{{\bf q}}
427: \left( \frac{c_{\rm sw}}{\omega_q} \right)^{3/2}
428: {\rm e}^{i{\bf q}\cdot {\bf R}_j }
429: \left( a_{-q}^{\dagger} -a_{{\bf q}}
430: \right) \psi_j,
431: \end{equation}
432: we find that the fermion field $\psi_j$ is transformed into
433: \begin{equation}
434: e^s \psi_j e^{-s}= X_j \psi_j,
435: \end{equation}
436: where
437: \begin{equation}
438: X_j = \exp \left[
439: -\frac{a^2 e_A}{\sqrt{2\Omega}}
440: \sum_{q}
441: \left( \frac{c_{\rm sw}}{\omega_q} \right)^{3/2}
442: \exp (i{\bf q}\cdot {\bf R}_j )
443: \left( a^{\dagger}_{-q} - a_{q} \right)
444: \right].
445: \end{equation}
446: The transformed Hamiltonian reads
447: \begin{equation}
448: \overline{H}=\overline{H}_0+\overline{H}_{\rm int},
449: \end{equation}
450: \begin{eqnarray}
451: \overline{H}_0 &=&
452: -\frac{c_{\rm sw}a}{2} \sum_{j,\mu=1,2}
453: \overline{\psi}_j
454: \gamma^{\mu}
455: \left(
456: \psi_{j+a{\hat e}_{\mu}}-\psi_{j-a{\hat e}_{\mu}} \right)
457: -mc_{\rm sw}^2 \sum_j \overline{\psi}_j \sigma_3 \psi_j
458: %\sum_{\bf k} \epsilon_k \psi_k^{\dagger} \psi_k
459: \nonumber \\
460: & & + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{q}
461: \omega_q \left( a^{\dagger}_q a_q
462: + a_q a^{\dagger}_q \right),
463: \label{eq_Hbar}
464: \end{eqnarray}
465: \begin{equation}
466: \overline{H}_{\rm int} =
467: - \sum_{q} \frac{M_{-q}M_{q}}{\omega_q},
468: \end{equation}
469: where we have omitted the band narrowing factor
470: $X_j^{\dagger} X_{j\pm a{\hat e}_{\mu}}$,
471: in the hopping term.
472: (The estimation is similar to that of eqs.(\ref{eq_delta}) and
473: (\ref{eq_ell}) below.
474: See Appendix~\ref{sec_DWF}.)
475: $\overline{H}_{\rm int}$ describes the logarithmic interaction between
476: the Dirac fermions.
477: In the following, we consider the effect of the longitudinal
478: gauge field on the Dirac fermion spectrum given by $\overline{H}_0$.
479:
480:
481: \section{Calculation of the Retarded Green's function}
482: \label{sec_green}
483: The retarded Green's function may be given by
484: \begin{equation}
485: G_R \left( {i,j;t} \right) = - i\theta \left( t \right)\left\langle
486: {\psi _i \left( t
487: \right)\overline \psi _j \left( 0 \right) + \overline \psi _j \left
488: ( 0 \right)\psi _i
489: \left( t \right)} \right\rangle
490: \end{equation}
491: We separate this quantity into two terms,
492: \begin{equation}
493: G_R(i,j;t) = G_1(i,j;t) + G_2(i,j;t),
494: \end{equation}
495: where
496: \begin{equation}
497: G_1 \left( {i,j;t} \right) = - i \theta (t)
498: \left\langle {\psi _i \left( t
499: \right)\overline \psi _j
500: \left( 0 \right)} \right\rangle,
501: \end{equation}
502: \begin{equation}
503: G_2 \left( {i,j;t} \right) = - i\theta (t)
504: \left\langle {
505: \overline \psi _j \left( 0 \right)
506: \psi _i \left( t \right)
507: } \right\rangle.
508: \end{equation}
509:
510:
511:
512: In the following calculations, we only consider the Dirac fermions
513: with the spin up component and residing near $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ in the
514: momentum space.
515: We redefine the Dirac fermion field $\psi (x)$ so that it represents
516: the spin up Dirac fermion and describes the components near
517: $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$.
518: For the $\gamma$ matrices, we may use the reduced form of $\gamma$
519: matrices:
520: $\gamma^0\rightarrow \tau_3$,
521: $\gamma^1\rightarrow i\tau_2$, and $\gamma^2\rightarrow i\tau_1$ with
522: $\tau_{\mu}$ the Pauli
523: matrices because we only consider the two components of the Dirac
524: fermion fields.
525: (The calculations below are equally applied to the Dirac
526: fermions with the spin down component and/or residing near
527: $(-\pi/2,\pi/2)$.)
528: For $t>0$, by performing the canonical transformation we have
529: \begin{eqnarray}
530: iG_1 \left( {i,j;t} \right)
531: &=& \left\langle {\psi _i \left( t \right)\overline \psi _j
532: \left( 0 \right)} \right\rangle \nonumber \\
533: &=& \frac{{Tr\,e^{ - \beta {\overline H}_0 } e^{i{\overline H}_0 t}
534: X_i \psi _i e^{ - i{\overline H}_0 t} \overline \psi _j X_j^{\dagger}
535: }}{{Tre^{ - \beta
536: {\overline H}_0 } }} \nonumber \\
537: &=&
538: \left\langle \exp \left[ {
539: - \frac{e_A}{{\sqrt {2\Omega }
540: }}
541: \sum\limits_{q}
542: {
543: \frac{1}{{\omega_q^{3/2} }}
544: \left( {a_{ - q }^\dag e^{i\omega _q t} -
545: a_{q} e^{ -
546: i\omega _q t} } \right)
547: \,e^{iq \cdot R_i }
548: } } \right]
549: \right. \nonumber \\ & & \left.
550: \times \frac{1}{\Omega}\sum\limits_{k,k'}
551: {e^{ -
552: i\gamma _0 \left( {i\sin k_1 \gamma _1 + i\sin k_2 \gamma _2 + m}
553: \right)t} \psi _k
554: \overline \psi _{k'} e^{ik \cdot R_i } e^{ - ik' \cdot R_j}}
555: \right. \nonumber \\
556: & & \times \left. {\exp \left[ \frac{e_A}{
557: {\sqrt {2\Omega } }}\sum\limits_{q} {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^{3/2}
558: }}}
559: \left( {a_{ - q}^\dag
560: - a_{q} } \right) \,e^{iq
561: \cdot R_j }
562: \right]} \right\rangle,
563: \label{eq_g1}
564: \end{eqnarray}
565: where we have used
566: \begin{equation}
567: {\rm e}^{i{\overline H}_0 t}
568: \psi _k {\rm e}^{-i\overline{H}_0t}
569: = \exp \left[ i\left( -\tau_1 \sin k_1 + \tau_2 \sin k_2 + \tau_3 m
570: \right) t
571: \right]\psi_k.
572: \end{equation}
573: (Hereafter we set $a=1$ and $c_{\rm sw}=1$.)
574: The matrix in the exponential is diagonalized by the following unitary
575: matrix:
576: \begin{equation}
577: U_k = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\varepsilon _k \left( {\varepsilon _k + m}
578: \right)} }}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
579: {\varepsilon _k + m} & { \sin k_1 + i\sin k_2 } \\
580: {-\sin k_1 + i\sin k_2 } & {\varepsilon _k + m} \\
581: \end{array}} \right),
582: \end{equation}
583: \begin{equation}
584: U_k^\dag = \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2\varepsilon _k \left( {\varepsilon _k + m}
585: \right)} }}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
586: {\varepsilon _k + m} & {-\sin k_1 - i\sin k_2 } \\
587: { \sin k_1 - i\sin k_2 } & {\varepsilon _k + m} \\
588: \end{array}} \right),
589: \end{equation}
590: with $\epsilon_k = \sqrt{\sin^2 k_1 + \sin^2 k_2 + m^2}$,
591: and then,
592: \begin{eqnarray}
593: iG_1 \left( {i,j;t} \right)
594: &=& \left\langle \exp \left[ { - \frac{e_A}{{\sqrt {2\Omega }
595: }}
596: \sum\limits_{q}
597: {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^{3/2} }}
598: \left( {a_{ - q}^\dag e^{i\omega _q t} - a_{q} e^{ -
599: i\omega _q t} } \right)
600: \,e^{iq \cdot R_i }
601: } } \right]
602: \right. \nonumber \\
603: & & \left. \times
604: {\exp \left[ { - \frac{e_A}{{\sqrt {2\Omega } }}\sum\limits_{q}
605: {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^{3/2} }}\left( {a_{ - q}^\dag - a_{q} }
606: \right)
607: \,e^{iq \cdot R_j }
608: } }
609: \right]} \right\rangle \nonumber \\
610: & & \times \frac{1}{\Omega }\sum\limits_k {U_k }
611: \left(
612: {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
613: {\left[ {1 - f\left( {\varepsilon _k } \right)} \right]
614: e^{-i\varepsilon _k t} } & 0 \\
615: 0 & {e^{i\varepsilon _k t} f\left( {\varepsilon _k } \right)} \\
616: \end{array}}
617: \right)
618: U_k^\dag e^{ik \cdot \left({R_i-R_j} \right)}.
619: \end{eqnarray}
620:
621:
622:
623: Using the following formula,
624: \begin{equation}
625: e^{Aa^\dag + Ba} e^{Ca^\dag + Da} = e^{\frac{1}{2}\left( {AB +
626: CD} \right) + BC} e^{\left( {A + C} \right)a^\dag } e^{\left( {B + D}
627: \right)a},
628: \end{equation}
629: \begin{equation}
630: \left\langle {e^{Aa^\dag } e^{Ba} } \right\rangle =
631: e^{AB\left\langle {a^\dag a} \right\rangle },
632: \end{equation}
633: we obtain
634: \begin{eqnarray}
635: \lefteqn{
636: \left\langle
637: \exp \left[ -\frac{e_A}{\sqrt{2\Omega}}
638: \sum_q \frac{1}{\omega_q^{3/2}}
639: \left( a_{-q}^{\dagger} - a_q \right)
640: e^{iq\cdot R_j} \right]
641: \exp \left[ \frac{e_A}{\sqrt{2\Omega}}
642: \sum_q \frac{1}{\omega_q^{3/2}}
643: \left( a_{-q}^{\dagger}e^{i\omega_q t}
644: - a_q e^{-i\omega_q t} \right)
645: e^{iq\cdot R_j} \right] \right\rangle}
646: \nonumber \\
647: &=& \exp \left[ -\frac{e_A^2}{2\Omega}
648: \sum_q \frac{1}{\omega_q^3}
649: \left(1-e^{i\omega_q t} e^{-iq\cdot (R_i-R_j)}
650: \right) \right]
651: \exp \left[ -\frac{e_A^2}{\Omega}
652: \sum_q \frac{1}{\omega_q^3}
653: \left(1-\cos \left[ \omega_q t -q\cdot (R_i-R_j)
654: \right]
655: \right) n(\omega_q) \right]
656: \nonumber \\
657: &=&
658: \exp \left[ { i\frac{{e_A^2 }}{{2\Omega }}\sum\limits_q
659: {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }}\sin \left[ {\omega _q t - q \cdot \left
660: ( {R_i - R_j } \right)} \right]} } \right] \nonumber \\
661: & & \times
662: \exp \left[ -\frac{e_A^2}{2\Omega}
663: \sum_q \frac{1}{\omega_q^3} \coth \frac{\beta \omega_q}{2}
664: \left(1-\cos \left[ \omega_q t -q\cdot (R_i-R_j)
665: \right]
666: \right) \right]
667: \label{eq_I}
668: \end{eqnarray}
669:
670:
671: Since $\epsilon_k > m \simeq J$, and we are interested in
672: the temperature region where $\beta J \gg 1$, we may assume
673: that $f(\epsilon_k) \ll 1$.
674: Thus,
675: \begin{eqnarray}
676: iG_1 \left( {i,j;t} \right)
677: & \simeq & \exp \left[ { i\frac{{e_A^2 }}{{2\Omega }}\sum\limits_q
678: {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }}\sin \left[ {\omega _q t - q \cdot \left
679: ( {R_i - R_j } \right)} \right]} } \right] \nonumber \\
680: & & \times \exp \left[ { - \frac{{e_A^2 }}{{2\Omega }}\sum\limits_q
681: {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }}\coth \frac{\beta\omega_q}{2}
682: \left( {1 - \cos \left[ {\omega _q t - q \cdot \left( {R_i -
683: R_j } \right)} \right]} \right)} } \right] \nonumber \\
684: & & \times \frac{1}{\Omega }\sum\limits_k {e^{i\varepsilon _k t}
685: e^{ik \cdot \left( {R_i - R_j } \right)} \frac{1}{{2\varepsilon _k
686: }}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
687: {m + \varepsilon _k } & { - \sin k_1 - i\sin k_2 } \\
688: { - \sin k_1 + i\sin k_2 } & {\varepsilon _k - m} \\
689: \end{array}} \right)}
690: \end{eqnarray}
691: Performing similar calculations, we obtain
692: \begin{eqnarray}
693: iG_2 \left( {i,j;t} \right)
694: &\simeq & \exp \left[ {i\frac{{e_A^2 }}{{2\Omega }}\sum\limits_q
695: {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }}\sin \left[ {\omega _q t - q \cdot \left
696: ( {R_i - R_j } \right)} \right]} } \right] \nonumber \\
697: & & \times \exp \left[ { - \frac{{e_A^2 }}{\Omega }\sum\limits_q
698: {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }} \coth \frac{\beta\omega_q}{2}
699: \left( {1 - \cos \left[ {\omega _q t - q \cdot \left( {R_i -
700: R_j } \right)} \right]} \right)} } \right] \nonumber \\
701: & & \times \frac{1}{\Omega }\sum\limits_k {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
702: 0 & 0 \\
703: 0 & 1 \\
704: \end{array}} \right)e^{ - i\varepsilon _k t} e^{ik \cdot \left( {R_i
705: - R_j } \right)} }
706: \label{eq_Gr}
707: \end{eqnarray}
708: Finally, we obtain
709: \begin{eqnarray}
710: iG_R \left( {i,j;t} \right)
711: &\simeq & \exp \left[ { - \frac{{e_A^2 }}{\Omega
712: }\sum\limits_q {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }}
713: \coth \frac{\beta\omega_q}{2}
714: \left( {1 - \cos \left[ {\omega _q t - q \cdot \left( {R_i -
715: R_j } \right)} \right]} \right)} } \right] \nonumber \\
716: & &
717: \times \frac{1}{\Omega }\sum\limits_k {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
718: {e^{i\varepsilon _k t} e^{ik \cdot \left( {R_i - R_j } \right)}
719: f\left( {i,j;t} \right)} & 0 \\
720: 0 & {e^{ - i\varepsilon _k t} e^{ik \cdot \left( {R_i - R_j }
721: \right)} f^* \left( {i,j;t} \right)} \\
722: \end{array}} \right)},
723: \end{eqnarray}
724: with
725: \begin{equation}
726: f(i,j;t)=
727: \exp \left[ {i\frac{{e_A^2 }}{{2\Omega }}\sum\limits_q
728: {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }}
729: \sin \left( \omega_q t \right)
730: \cos \left[ q\cdot (R_i-R_j) \right]
731: }} \right],
732: \end{equation}
733: where we have assumed that $(m+\epsilon_k)/2\epsilon_k \simeq 1$,
734: $(m-\epsilon_k)/2\epsilon_k \simeq 0$, and $(\sin k_1 \pm i \sin
735: k_2)/2\epsilon_k \simeq 0$.
736: Because for the small hole concentration, $k/m\ll 1$.
737: Note that the factor,
738: \begin{equation}
739: \frac{1}{\Omega }\sum\limits_k {e^{ \pm i\varepsilon _k t}
740: e^{ik \cdot \left( {R_i - R_j } \right)} },
741: \end{equation}
742: denotes the wave function of the free propagating particle.
743:
744:
745: The second exponential factor ($\equiv I$) in the last line of
746: Eq.(\ref{eq_I}) leads to a localization effect of the Dirac fermions.
747: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
748: $I$ is approximated as follows,
749: \begin{equation}
750: I\simeq -\frac{e_A^2}{8\pi^2}
751: %\int \frac{d^2 {\bf q}}{(2\pi)^2}
752: \int_0^{\pi} dq \int_0^{2\pi} d\theta
753: \frac{q}{\omega_q^3} \coth \frac{\beta \omega_q}{2}
754: \left(1-\cos \left[ \omega_q t -q\cdot (R_i-R_j)
755: \right]
756: \right).
757: \end{equation}
758: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
759: From numerical estimations, we see that $I$ has the Gaussian form as
760: shown in Figs.~\ref{fig_IR} and \ref{fig_It}.
761: We find that
762: \begin{equation}
763: I \simeq \exp \left(-1.8125 t^2 -0.90625 R^2\right).
764: \label{eq_IG}
765: \end{equation}
766: \begin{figure}[htbp]
767: %\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{IR.eps}
768: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig1.eps}
769: \caption{The decay factor $I$ as the function of $R=|{\bf
770: R}_{ij}|$ for several $t$ values.
771: The vector ${\bf R}_{ij}$ is assumed to be ${\bf R}_{ij}=(R_{ij},0)$.}
772: \label{fig_IR}
773: \end{figure}
774: \begin{figure}[htbp]
775: %\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{It.eps}
776: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig2.eps}
777: \caption{The decay factor $I$ as the function of $t$ for
778: several $R_{ij}(\equiv R)$ values.
779: The vector ${\bf R}_{ij}$ is assumed to be ${\bf R}_{ij}=(R_{ij},0)$
780: as in Fig.~\ref{fig_IR}.}
781: \label{fig_It}
782: \end{figure}
783:
784: To reproduce this Gaussian form,
785: we make a following approximation:
786: \begin{eqnarray}
787: I &\simeq & - \frac{{e_A^2 }}{{4 }}
788: \int \frac{d^2 {\bf q}}{(2\pi)^2}
789: {\frac{1}{{\omega
790: _q^3 }}\coth \frac{{\beta \omega _q }}{2}\left[ {\omega _q^2 t^2 +
791: \left( {q \cdot \left( {R_i - R_j } \right)} \right)^2 } \right]}
792: \nonumber \\
793: &\equiv & - \frac{1}{4}\Delta ^2 t^2 - \frac{{\left( {R_i - R_j }
794: \right)^2 }}{{\ell ^2 }},
795: \end{eqnarray}
796: where
797: \begin{equation}
798: \Delta ^2 =
799: e_A^2
800: \int \frac{d^2 {\bf q}}{(2\pi)^2}
801: {\frac{1}{{\omega
802: _q }}\coth \frac{{\beta \omega _q }}{2}}
803: \label{eq_delta}
804: \end{equation}
805: \begin{equation}
806: \frac{1}{{\ell ^2 }} = \frac{{e_A^2 }}{{4}}
807: \int \frac{d^2 {\bf q}}{(2\pi)^2}
808: {\frac{{q^2 }}{{\omega _q^3 }}\coth \frac{{\beta \omega _q }}{2}}
809: \label{eq_ell}
810: \end{equation}
811: %If we evaluate the exponential factor without using this
812: %approximation, then the decay is more rapid than this form.
813: %Here we have introduced the approximation for simplicity.
814: At low temperatures,
815: $\Delta$ is
816: \[
817: \Delta ^2 \simeq \frac{{e_A^2 }}{\pi }\int_{q_0 }^\Lambda {dq}
818: \,\frac{q}{{\omega _q }}\coth \frac{{\beta \omega _q }}{2} =
819: \frac{{e_A^2 }}{\pi }\left[ {\left( {\Lambda - q_0 } \right) +
820: 2\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\frac{{e^{ - n\beta q_0 } - e^{ -
821: n\beta \Lambda } }}{{n\beta }}} } \right] \simeq \frac{{e_A^2 }}{\pi
822: }\Lambda
823: \]
824: Using the values of $Z_c=1.17$, which
825: was estimated from quantum Monte Calro simulations,\cite{QMC}
826: and $m=1.3J$, which was estimated experimentally,
827: \cite{RONNING_ETALUN}
828: we obtain
829: $\Lambda \simeq \pi /a = \sqrt 2 \pi Z_c J \simeq 5J$,
830: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
831: % corrected Dec.9/2005
832: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
833: %$e_A^2 = \frac{{3\pi }}{2}m \simeq 6J$.
834: $e_A^2 = 3\pi m \simeq 12J$.
835: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
836: Thus,
837: \begin{equation}
838: \Delta \simeq 3J.
839: \end{equation}
840: This value is in good agreement with the value $\Delta \simeq 2.7J$,
841: which is obtained from Eq.(\ref{eq_IG}).
842: Therefore, the above Gaussian approximation is justified.
843: Similarly $\ell$ is evaluated as
844: \begin{equation}
845: \frac{1}{{\ell ^2 }} \simeq \frac{{e_A^2 }}{{8\pi }}\int_{q_0
846: }^\Lambda {dq} \coth \frac{{\beta \omega _q }}{2} \simeq \frac{{e_A^2
847: }}{{8\pi }}\Lambda,
848: \end{equation}
849: \begin{equation}
850: \ell \simeq 2a.
851: \end{equation}
852: From Eq.(\ref{eq_IG}), we find $\ell \simeq a$.
853: These result suggest that the particle is localized with the
854: localization length of $\ell = O(a)$.
855:
856:
857: The function $f(i,j;t)$ is associated with the wave function
858: renormalization.
859: The argument of the exponential is
860: \begin{equation}
861: \sim \frac{1}{2} Jt\ln \left( \frac{\Lambda}{q_0} \right) \leq \ln
862: \left( \frac{\Lambda}{q_0} \right).
863: \end{equation}
864: (The value of $t$ that gives the saddle point in the frequency
865: integration may be used in the calculation of $G_R (k,\omega)$ below.)
866: As a rough approximation, we take $f(i,j;t)$ as a constant $C$.
867: Thus,
868: \begin{equation}
869: iG_R \left( {i,j;t} \right) = \exp \left[ { - \frac{1}{4}\Delta ^2 t^2
870: - \frac{{\left| {R_i - R_j } \right|^2 }}{{\ell ^2 }}} \right] \times
871: \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
872: {\frac{C}{\Omega }\sum\limits_k {e^{i\varepsilon _k t} e^{ik \cdot
873: \left( {R_i - R_j } \right)} } } & 0 \\
874: 0 & {\frac{{C^* }}{\Omega }\sum\limits_k {e^{ - i\varepsilon _k t}
875: e^{ik \cdot \left( {R_i - R_j } \right)} } } \\
876: \end{array}} \right).
877: \end{equation}
878: Performing Fourier transformation, we obtain
879: \begin{equation}
880: iG_R (k,\omega) = \frac{8\pi^{5/2}}{\Delta}
881: \left(
882: \begin{array}{cc}
883: C\exp \left[
884: -(\omega-\epsilon_k)^2/\Delta^2 \right]
885: & 0 \\
886: 0 & C^* \exp \left[
887: -(\omega+\epsilon_k)^2/\Delta^2 \right]
888: \end{array}
889: \right)
890: \end{equation}
891: The spectral function is
892: \begin{equation}
893: -\frac{1}{\pi} {\rm Im} G_R (k,\omega)
894: =Z\frac{2\pi^{1/2}}{\Delta}
895: \left(
896: \begin{array}{cc}
897: \exp \left[
898: -(\omega-\epsilon_k)^2/\Delta^2 \right]
899: & 0 \\
900: 0 & \exp \left[
901: -(\omega+\epsilon_k)^2/\Delta^2 \right]
902: \end{array}
903: \right),
904: \end{equation}
905: where $Z$ is the wave function renormalization factor given by $Z=4\pi
906: {\rm Re} C$.
907: Thus, the spectral function has a Gaussian form.
908: This is consistent with the experiments.\cite{SHEN_ETAL}
909: The value of the width $\Delta \sim 3J$ appears reasonable compared
910: with the experiments.
911: The main drawback in the present calculation is that
912: we cannot discuss anisotropy in the momentum space observed in the
913: experiments.
914: Because we have started from the continuum theory.
915: In order to discuss anisotropy, we need to formulate the theory on the
916: lattice.
917:
918:
919:
920: \section{Conclusion}
921: \label{sec_conclusion}
922: To conclude, we have studied the effect of the longitudinal gauge
923: field on the quasiparticle spectrum in the $\pi$-flux phase
924: with the dynamically induced mass.
925: A canonical transformation is applied for the analysis of the strong
926: coupling effect between the massive Dirac fermions and the
927: longitudinal gauge field.
928: We have shown that the Dirac fermion propagator has the strong decay
929: form that leads to the localized state.
930: The spectral function is approximately given by a Gaussian form.
931: The width of the broad spectral line shape is $\sim 4J$
932: and the localization length is $\sim 3a$.
933:
934:
935: %Disordered phase\\
936: Although we have carried out the analysis in the N{\' e}el ordering
937: phase, in the disordered phase
938: we expect a qualitatively different behavior because there is no
939: strong logarithmic potential that leads to confinement.
940: %In this regime we do not expect localization of the particles.
941: It would be interesting to study the delocalization transition
942: associated with the N{\' e}el order destruction.
943:
944:
945: \acknowledgments
946: I would like to thank N.~Nakai and K.~Shizuya for discussions.
947: This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists(B)
948: (17740253) and the 21st Century COE "Center for Diversity and
949: Universality in Physics" from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
950: Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan.
951:
952:
953: \appendix
954: \section{Derivation of QED$_3$ action in the $\pi$-flux phase}
955: \label{sec_qed3}
956: In this appendix we derive the QED$_3$ action (\ref{eq_qed3}) in the
957: $\pi$-flux phase\cite{AFFLECK_MARSTON} with the dynamically induced
958: mass $m$.
959: The $S=1/2$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model is given by
960: \begin{equation}
961: H=J\sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} {\bf S}_i \cdot {\bf S}_j,
962: \end{equation}
963: where the summation is taken over the nearest neighbor sites.
964: The spin $1/2$ can be represented by fermion fields,
965: \begin{equation}
966: {\bf S}_j = \frac12
967: \left( \begin{array}{cc}
968: f_{j\uparrow}^{\dagger} &
969: f_{j\downarrow}^{\dagger}
970: \end{array} \right)
971: {\mbox{\boldmath ${\bf \sigma}$}}
972: \left(
973: \begin{array}{c}
974: f_{j\uparrow}\\
975: f_{j\downarrow}
976: \end{array}
977: \right),
978: \end{equation}
979: where $f_{j\sigma}$ and $f_{j\sigma}^{\dagger}$ are fermion
980: annihilation and creation operators at site $j$ with spin $\sigma$,
981: respectively.
982: The fermion operators satisfy the constraint,
983: $\sum_{\sigma} f_{j\sigma}^{\dagger} f_{j\sigma}=1$.
984: In this fermion representation, the Hamiltonian reads
985: \begin{equation}
986: H=-\frac{J}{2} \sum_{\langle i,j\rangle} \sum_{\alpha,\beta}
987: f_{i\alpha}^{\dagger} f_{j\alpha} f_{j\beta}^{\dagger} f_{i\beta}
988: + i\sum_j \lambda_j
989: \left( \sum_{\alpha} f_{j\alpha}^{\dagger} f_{j\alpha} -1\right)
990: + {\rm const.}
991: \end{equation}
992: Here $\lambda_j$ is a Lagrange multiplier to impose the constraint.
993: Following Affleck and Marston,\cite{AFFLECK_MARSTON}
994: we take the mean fields,
995: \begin{equation}
996: \chi_{ij} = \sum_{\alpha}
997: \langle
998: f_{j\alpha}^{\dagger} f_{i\alpha}
999: \rangle,
1000: \hspace{2em} \lambda_j = \lambda.
1001: \end{equation}
1002: We set $\chi_1 = \chi_{j,j+{\hat e}_x}$,
1003: $\chi_2 = \chi_{j+{\hat e}_x,j+{\hat e}_y}$,
1004: $\chi_3 = \chi_{j+{\hat e}_x+{\hat e}_y,j+{\hat e}_y}$,
1005: and $\chi_4 = \chi_{j+{\hat e}_y,j}$.
1006: Now the Hamiltonian is
1007: \begin{eqnarray}
1008: H&=& -\frac{J}{2} \sum_{j\in even} \sum_{\sigma}
1009: \left(
1010: \chi_1 f_{j+{\hat x},\sigma}^{\dagger} f_{j\sigma}
1011: +\chi_4^* f_{j+{\hat y},\sigma}^{\dagger} f_{j\sigma} + h.c.
1012: \right)
1013: -\frac{J}{2} \sum_{j\in odd}
1014: \left(
1015: \chi_3^* f_{j+{\hat x},\sigma}^{\dagger} f_{j\sigma}
1016: +\chi_2 f_{j+{\hat y},\sigma}^{\dagger} f_{j\sigma} + h.c.
1017: \right) \nonumber \\
1018: & & +\frac{NJ}{4} \left(
1019: |\chi_1|^2+|\chi_2|^2+|\chi_3|^2+|\chi_4|^2
1020: \right)
1021: + i\lambda\sum_j \left(
1022: \sum_{\sigma} f_{j\sigma}^{\dagger} f_{j\sigma}-1 \right).
1023: \end{eqnarray}
1024: Performing the Fourier transformation
1025: \begin{equation}
1026: f_{j\sigma} =\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{\bf k}
1027: {\rm e}^{i{\bf k}\cdot {\bf R}_j }
1028: f_{{\bf k}\sigma}
1029: =\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} {\sum_{\bf k}}^{\prime}
1030: {\rm e}^{i{\bf k}\cdot {\bf R}_j }
1031: \left[
1032: f_{{\bf k}\sigma}
1033: +
1034: (-1)^j f_{{\bf k}+{\bf Q}\sigma} \right],
1035: \end{equation}
1036: with ${\sum_{\bf k}}^{\prime}$ being the summation over the half of
1037: the Brillouin zone,
1038: we obtain
1039: \begin{equation}
1040: H=-\frac{J}{2} {\sum_{\bf k}}^{\prime}
1041: \left(
1042: \begin{array}{cc}
1043: f_{e{\bf k}}^{\dagger} &f_{o{\bf k}}^{\dagger}
1044: \end{array}
1045: \right)
1046: \left(
1047: \begin{array}{cc}
1048: 0 & \kappa_{\bf k}^* \\
1049: \kappa_{\bf k} & 0
1050: \end{array}
1051: \right)
1052: \left(
1053: \begin{array}{c}
1054: f_{e{\bf k}} \\
1055: f_{o{\bf k}}
1056: \end{array}
1057: \right) + {\rm const.},
1058: \end{equation}
1059: where the two-component spinors $f_{ek}$ and $f_{ok}$ are
1060: $f_{e{\bf k}} = (f_{\bf k} + f_{{\bf k}+{\bf Q}})/\sqrt{2}$
1061: and $f_{o{\bf k}} = (f_{\bf k} - f_{{\bf k}+{\bf Q}})/\sqrt{2}$,
1062: and $\kappa_{\bf k} = \chi_1 {\rm e}^{-ik_x}+
1063: \chi_3 {\rm e}^{ik_x}+\chi_2^* {\rm e}^{ik_y}+\chi_4^*
1064: {\rm e}^{-ik_x}$.
1065:
1066:
1067: In the N{\' e}el ordering phase, there is the staggered magnetization
1068: term
1069: \begin{equation}
1070: \sum_{j} m_{\rm st} (-1)^j f_j^{\dagger} \sigma_3 f_j
1071: = m_{\rm st}{\sum_{\bf k}}^{\prime}
1072: \left( f_{e{\bf k}}^{\dagger} \sigma_3 f_{e{\bf k}}
1073: -f_{o{\bf k}}^{\dagger} \sigma_3 f_{o{\bf k}}
1074: \right),
1075: \end{equation}
1076: where $\sigma_3$ is a Pauli matrix in spin space.
1077: Following Affleck and Marston,\cite{AFFLECK_MARSTON}
1078: we take
1079: $\chi_1=\chi_3=|\chi|$ and $\chi_2=\chi_4=i|\chi|$. Then,
1080: \begin{equation}
1081: H= {\sum_{\bf k}}^{\prime}
1082: \left(
1083: \begin{array}{cc}
1084: f_{e{\bf k}}^{\dagger} &f_{o{\bf k}}^{\dagger}
1085: \end{array}
1086: \right)
1087: \left(
1088: \begin{array}{cc}
1089: m_{\rm st} \sigma_3 & J|\chi| \left( \cos k_1 + i\cos k_2 \right) \\
1090: J|\chi| \left( \cos k_1 - i\cos k_2 \right)& -m_{\rm st}\sigma_3
1091: \end{array}
1092: \right)
1093: \left(
1094: \begin{array}{c}
1095: f_{e{\bf k}} \\
1096: f_{o{\bf k}}
1097: \end{array}
1098: \right) + {\rm const.}
1099: \end{equation}
1100: The low-energy Hamiltonian near $(\pm \pi/2, \pi/2)$ points is
1101: \begin{eqnarray}
1102: H &\simeq &
1103: {\sum_{\bf k}}'
1104: \left(
1105: \begin{array}{cccc}
1106: f_{e1{\bf k}}^{\dagger} &
1107: f_{o1{\bf k}}^{\dagger} &
1108: f_{e2{\bf k}}^{\dagger} &
1109: f_{o2{\bf k}}^{\dagger}
1110: \end{array} \right)
1111: \left[
1112: \left( \begin{array}{cc} \tau_3 & 0 \\
1113: 0 & -\tau_3 \end{array} \right)
1114: m_{\rm st} \sigma_3
1115: -J|\chi| k_1
1116: \left( \begin{array}{cc} \tau_1 & 0 \\
1117: 0 & -\tau_1 \end{array} \right)
1118: \right. \nonumber \\
1119: & & \left.
1120: +J|\chi| k_2
1121: \left( \begin{array}{cc} \tau_2 & 0 \\
1122: 0 & \tau_2 \end{array} \right)
1123: \right]
1124: \left(
1125: \begin{array}{c}
1126: f_{e1{\bf k}}\\
1127: f_{o1{\bf k}}\\
1128: f_{e2{\bf k}}\\
1129: f_{o2{\bf k}}
1130: \end{array}
1131: \right).
1132: \end{eqnarray}
1133: Here $f_{e,o1{\bf k}}$ describes the field near $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$
1134: and $f_{e,o2{\bf k}}$ describes the field near $(-\pi/2,\pi/2)$.
1135: The matrices $\tau_j$ are Pauli matrices.
1136: Note that in this representation $(-\pi/2,-\pi/2)$ and
1137: $(\pi/2,-\pi/2)$ are equivalent to
1138: $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ and $(-\pi/2,\pi/2)$, respectively.
1139: The Lagrangian is given by
1140: \begin{equation}
1141: L=\int d^2 {\bf r}
1142: {\psi}^{\dagger} ({\bf r},t)
1143: \left[ i\partial_t
1144: - J|\chi|i\partial_x
1145: \left(
1146: \begin{array}{cc}
1147: \tau_1 & 0 \\
1148: 0 & -\tau_1
1149: \end{array}
1150: \right)
1151: +J|\chi|i\partial_y
1152: \left(
1153: \begin{array}{cc}
1154: \tau_2 & 0 \\
1155: 0 & \tau_2
1156: \end{array}
1157: \right)
1158: -m_{\rm st}\sigma_3
1159: \left(
1160: \begin{array}{cc}
1161: \tau_3 & 0 \\
1162: 0 & -\tau_3
1163: \end{array}
1164: \right)
1165: \right] \psi ({\bf r},t),
1166: \end{equation}
1167: where ${\psi}^{\dagger} ({\bf r})
1168: = (1/\sqrt{\Omega}) {\sum_k}'\exp \left(- i{\bf k}\cdot {\bf r}
1169: \right) \left(
1170: \begin{array}{cccc}
1171: f_{e1{\bf k}}^{\dagger} &
1172: f_{o1{\bf k}}^{\dagger} &
1173: f_{e2{\bf k}}^{\dagger} &
1174: f_{o2{\bf k}}^{\dagger}
1175: \end{array} \right)$.
1176: After performing the unitary transformation,
1177: \begin{equation}
1178: \psi ({\bf r},t) \rightarrow
1179: \left(
1180: \begin{array}{cc}
1181: 1 & 0 \\
1182: 0 & i\tau_2 \sigma_1
1183: \end{array}
1184: \right)\psi ({\bf r},t),
1185: \end{equation}
1186: we obtain
1187: \begin{equation}
1188: L = \int d^2 {\bf r}
1189: \overline{\psi}({\bf r},t)
1190: \left[
1191: i\gamma^0 \partial_t -J|\chi| \gamma^1 i\partial_1
1192: -J|\chi| \gamma^2 i\partial_2 - m\sigma_3
1193: \right]\psi ({\bf r},t),
1194: \end{equation}
1195: where $\overline{\psi}=\psi^{\dagger} \gamma^0$,
1196: \begin{equation}
1197: \gamma_0 = \left(
1198: \begin{array}{cc} \tau_3 & 0 \\
1199: 0 & -\tau_3
1200: \end{array}
1201: \right),
1202: \hspace{2em}
1203: \gamma_1 = \left(
1204: \begin{array}{cc} i\tau_2 & 0 \\
1205: 0 & -i\tau_2
1206: \end{array}
1207: \right),
1208: \hspace{2em}
1209: \gamma_2 = \left(
1210: \begin{array}{cc} i\tau_1 & 0 \\
1211: 0 & -i\tau_1
1212: \end{array}
1213: \right).
1214: \end{equation}
1215: Setting $J|\chi| = c_{\rm sw}$,
1216: we obtain
1217: \begin{equation}
1218: S=\int d^3 x \overline{\psi} (x)
1219: \left( i\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}
1220: -mc_{\rm sw} \sigma_3 \right) \psi (x),
1221: \end{equation}
1222: where $mc_{\rm sw}^2 = m_{\rm st}$.
1223: Fluctuations about the mean field state are included by a U(1) gauge
1224: field, $A_{\mu}$.\cite{AFFLECK_MARSTON,KIM_LEE}
1225: This is done by replacing $\partial_{\mu}$ with the covariant
1226: derivative
1227: $D_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu} + iA_{\mu}$.
1228:
1229:
1230: The action of the gauge field $A_{\mu}$ is obtained by calculating the
1231: fermion polarization function as explicitly shown, for instance,
1232: in Ref.\cite{KIM_LEE}.
1233: Since the fermions are massive, the action has the following
1234: Maxwellian form:
1235: \begin{equation}
1236: S_A= - \frac{1}{4e_A^2}\int d^3 x F_{\mu \nu } F^{\mu \nu },
1237: \end{equation}
1238: The coefficient $1/e_A^2$ is dependent on the mass
1239: through $e_A^2 = 3\pi m$.\cite{KIM_LEE}
1240:
1241:
1242: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1243: % Derivation of the Maxwell term (Dec.8/2005)
1244: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1245: We derive this action in the imaginary-time formalism.
1246: If we take the imaginary time as $it=\tau$,
1247: and define $x_3=c_{sw} \tau$, then
1248: the action takes the so-called Euclidean action:
1249: \begin{equation}
1250: S = \int {d^3 x} \,\overline \psi \left( x \right)\left[ {\gamma _\mu
1251: \left( {\partial _\mu - iA_\mu } \right) + M} \right]\psi \left( x
1252: \right),
1253: \end{equation}
1254: where $M = mc_{sw}$.
1255: The $\gamma$-matrices are changed as follows,
1256: \begin{equation}
1257: i\gamma ^1 \to \gamma _1 ,
1258: ~~i\gamma ^2 \to \gamma _2 ,
1259: ~~\gamma ^0 \to \gamma _3.
1260: \end{equation}
1261: Their explicit forms are
1262: \begin{equation}
1263: \gamma _1 = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1264: { - \tau _2 } & 0 \\
1265: 0 & {\tau _2 } \\
1266: \end{array}} \right),
1267: ~~\gamma _2 = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1268: { - \tau _1 } & 0 \\
1269: 0 & {\tau _1 } \\
1270: \end{array}} \right),
1271: ~~\gamma _3 = \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1272: {\tau _3 } & 0 \\
1273: 0 & { - \tau _3 } \\
1274: \end{array}} \right)
1275: \end{equation}
1276: The Dirac fermion Green's function is
1277: \begin{equation}
1278: G_k = - \left( {i\gamma _\mu k_\mu + M} \right)^{ - 1}.
1279: \end{equation}
1280: One obtains,
1281: \begin{equation}
1282: \left( {ik_3 \tau _3 - ik_1 \tau _2 - ik_2 \tau _1 + M} \right)^{ - 1} =
1283: \frac{1}{{M^2 + k^2 }}\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1284: { - ik_3 + M} & {k_1 + ik_2 } \\
1285: { - k_1 + ik_2 } & {ik_3 + M} \\
1286: \end{array}} \right)
1287: \end{equation}
1288: Thus, the Green's function is given by
1289: \begin{equation}
1290: G_k = \frac{1}{{k^2 + M^2 }}\left( {ik_\mu \gamma _\mu - M}
1291: \right).
1292: \end{equation}
1293:
1294: Now we integrate out the Dirac fermions fields.
1295: After Fourier transformation, the action reads,
1296: \begin{equation}
1297: S = \sum\limits_{k,k'} {\,\overline {\psi _k } \left[ {\left( {ik_\mu
1298: \gamma _\mu + M} \right)\delta _{k,k'} - i\gamma _\mu A_\mu \left
1299: ( {k - k'} \right)} \right]} \psi _{k'}.
1300: \end{equation}
1301: Integrating out the Dirac fermions yields
1302: \begin{eqnarray}
1303: S &=& - Tr\ln \left( { - G_k^{ - 1} } \right) - Tr\ln \left[ {1 +
1304: iG\gamma _\mu A_\mu } \right] \nonumber \\
1305: &=& - Tr\ln \left( { - G_k^{ - 1}
1306: } \right) - Tr\left[ {iG\gamma _\mu A_\mu - \frac{1}{2}\left
1307: ( {iG\gamma _\mu A_\mu } \right)^2 + ...} \right].
1308: \end{eqnarray}
1309: The effective action of the gauge field is
1310: \begin{equation}
1311: S^{\left( 2 \right)} = \frac{1}{2}\int {\frac{{d^3 q}}{{\left( {2\pi
1312: } \right)^3 }}} \Pi _{\mu \nu } \left( q \right)A_\mu \left( { - q}
1313: \right)A_\nu \left( q \right).
1314: \end{equation}
1315: The polarization function $\Pi_{\mu \nu} (q)$ is
1316: \begin{equation}
1317: \Pi _{\mu \nu } \left( q \right) = - \int {\frac{{d^3 k}}{{\left
1318: ( {2\pi } \right)^3 }}} tr\left[ {G_k \gamma _\mu G_{k + q} \gamma
1319: _\nu } \right]
1320: \end{equation}
1321: Here $tr$ is taken over Dirac fermion components and spin space.
1322:
1323: In order to calculate $\Pi_{\mu \nu} (q)$, we use
1324: the Feynman trick:
1325: \begin{equation}
1326: \frac{1}{{ab}} = \int_0^1 {dx} \,\frac{1}{{\left[ {a\left( {1 - x}
1327: \right) + bx} \right]^2 }}.
1328: \end{equation}
1329: By making use of the Feynman trick, we obtain
1330: \begin{eqnarray}
1331: \Pi _{\mu \nu } \left( q \right)
1332: &=& - \int {\frac{{d^3 k}}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^3 }}}
1333: \int_0^1 {dx\,\frac{1}{{\left[ {\left( {k +xq} \right)^2
1334: + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 } \right]^2 }}}
1335: \nonumber \\
1336: & & \times tr\left[ {\left( {ik_\mu \gamma _\mu - M} \right)\gamma
1337: _\mu \left( {i\left( {k + q} \right)_\mu \gamma _\mu - M}
1338: \right)\gamma _\nu } \right] \nonumber \\
1339: &=& - \int {\frac{{d^3 k}}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^3 }}} \int_0^1
1340: {dx\,\frac{1}{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }
1341: \right]^2 }}} \nonumber \\
1342: & & \times tr\left[ {\left( {i\left( {k - xq}
1343: \right)_\mu \gamma _\mu - M} \right)\gamma _\mu \left( {i\left
1344: ( {k + \left( {1 - x} \right)q} \right)_\mu \gamma _\mu - M}
1345: \right)\gamma _\nu } \right].
1346: \end{eqnarray}
1347: To calculate the terms including $\gamma$-matrices,
1348: we use the following formula:
1349: \begin{equation}
1350: \gamma _\mu \gamma _\nu = \delta _{\mu \nu } + i\varepsilon _{\mu
1351: \nu \lambda } \tau _\lambda \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
1352: 1 & 0 \\
1353: 0 & 1 \\
1354: \end{array}} \right),
1355: \end{equation}
1356: \begin{equation}
1357: tr\left( {\gamma _\mu \gamma _\nu } \right) = \delta _{\mu \nu }
1358: tr1,
1359: \end{equation}
1360: \begin{equation}
1361: tr\left( {\gamma _\alpha \gamma _\mu \gamma _\beta \gamma _\nu }
1362: \right) = \left( {\delta _{\alpha \mu } \delta _{\beta \nu } - \delta
1363: _{\alpha \beta } \delta _{\mu \nu } + \delta _{\alpha \nu } \delta
1364: _{\mu \beta } } \right)tr1.
1365: \end{equation}
1366: Thus, we obtain
1367: \begin{eqnarray}
1368: \Pi _{\mu \nu } \left( q \right)
1369: &=& - 8\int {\frac{{d^3 k}}{{\left
1370: ( {2\pi } \right)^3 }}} \int_0^1 {dx\,\frac{1}{{\left[ {k^2 +
1371: x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 } \right]^2 }}} \nonumber \\
1372: & & \times \left[ { - 2k_\mu k_\nu + 2x\left( {1 - x}
1373: \right)\left( {q_\mu q_\nu - q^2 \delta _{\mu \nu } } \right)}
1374: \right.\left. { + \left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }
1375: \right]\delta _{\mu \nu } } \right],
1376: \end{eqnarray}
1377: where we have used $tr 1=8$.
1378:
1379:
1380: As a convenient calculation scheme, we use
1381: the dimensional regularization:\cite{dim_reg}
1382: \begin{eqnarray}
1383: \Pi _{\mu \nu } \left( q \right)
1384: &=& - \frac{{16\pi ^{D/2} }}{{\left
1385: ( {2\pi } \right)^D \Gamma \left( {D/2} \right)}}\int_0^1
1386: {dx\,\int_0^\infty {dk} \,k^{D - 1} \frac{{2x\left( {1 - x}
1387: \right)\left( {q_\mu q_\nu - q^2 \delta _{\mu \nu } }
1388: \right)}}{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }
1389: \right]^2 }}} \nonumber \\
1390: & & - 8\int {\frac{{d^D k}}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D }}} \int_0^1
1391: {dx\,\frac{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }
1392: \right]\delta _{\mu \nu } - 2k_\mu k_\nu }}{{\left[ {k^2 +
1393: x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }
1394: \right]^2 }}}.
1395: \end{eqnarray}
1396: The integrations in the first term is calculated as follows
1397: \begin{eqnarray}
1398: \lefteqn{\int_0^1 {dx\,x\left( {1 - x} \right)\,\int_0^\infty {dk}
1399: \,\frac{{k^{D - 1} }}{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 +
1400: M^2 } \right]^2 }}}} \nonumber \\
1401: &=& \frac{\pi }{2}\frac{{1 - D/2}}{{\sin
1402: \left( {\pi D/2} \right)}}\int_0^1 {dx}
1403: \,x\left( {1 - x} \right)\left[ {M^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 }
1404: \right]^{D/2 - 2}
1405: \end{eqnarray}
1406: Setting $D = 3$, we obtain
1407: \begin{equation}
1408: \int_0^1 {dx} \,x\left( {1 - x} \right)\left[ {M^2 + x\left( {1 - x}
1409: \right)q^2 } \right]^{ - 1/2} = \frac{M}{{2q^2 }} + \frac{{q^2 -
1410: 4M^2 }}{{4q^3 }}\sin ^{ - 1} \frac{q}{{\sqrt {q^2 + 4M^2 } }}.
1411: \end{equation}
1412:
1413: The second term is rewritten as
1414: \begin{eqnarray}
1415: \lefteqn{\int {\frac{{d^D k}}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D }}} \int_0^1
1416: {dx\,\frac{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }
1417: \right]\delta _{\mu \nu } - 2k_\mu k_\nu }}{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left
1418: ( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 } \right]^2 }}}} \nonumber \\
1419: &=& \delta _{\mu \nu }
1420: \int {\frac{{d^D k}}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D }}} \int_0^1
1421: {dx\,\frac{1}{{k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }}} - 2\int
1422: {\frac{{d^D k}}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D }}} \int_0^1
1423: {dx\,\frac{{k_\mu k_\nu }}{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x}
1424: \right)q^2 + M^2 } \right]^2 }}}.
1425: \label{eq_2nd}
1426: \end{eqnarray}
1427: The integral over $k$ in the second term in the right hand side is
1428: carried out as follows
1429: \begin{eqnarray}
1430: \lefteqn{ \int {\frac{{d^D k}}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D }}}
1431: \frac{{k_\mu k_\nu }}{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 +
1432: M^2 } \right]^2 }} } \nonumber \\
1433: &=& \frac{{2\pi ^{D/2} }}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D
1434: D\Gamma \left( {D/2} \right)}}\delta _{\mu \nu } \int_0^\infty {dk}
1435: \,\frac{{k^{D + 1} }}{{\left[ {k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 +
1436: M^2 } \right]^2 }} \nonumber \\
1437: &=& \frac{{\pi ^{D/2 + 1} }}{{2\left( {2\pi }
1438: \right)^D \Gamma \left( {D/2} \right)}}\frac{{\left[ {x\left( {1 - x}
1439: \right)q^2 + M^2 } \right]^{D/2 - 1} }}{{\sin \left( {\pi D/2}
1440: \right)}}\delta _{\mu \nu }.
1441: \end{eqnarray}
1442: The first term in the right hand side is,
1443: \begin{eqnarray}
1444: \lefteqn{ \int {\frac{{d^D k}}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D }}}
1445: \frac{1}{{k^2 + x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }} }
1446: \nonumber \\
1447: &=& \frac{{2\pi ^{D/2}
1448: }}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D \Gamma \left( {D/2}
1449: \right)}}\int_0^\infty {dk} \,\frac{{\,k^{D - 1} }}{{k^2 + x\left
1450: ( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }} \nonumber \\
1451: &=& \frac{{\pi ^{D/2 + 1}
1452: }}{{\left( {2\pi } \right)^D \Gamma \left( {D/2}
1453: \right)}}\frac{{\left[ {x\left( {1 - x} \right)q^2 + M^2 }
1454: \right]^{D/2 - 1} }}{{\sin \left( {\pi D/2} \right)}}.
1455: \end{eqnarray}
1456: From these equations, we find that the two terms in the right hand
1457: side of Eq.~(\ref{eq_2nd}) exactly cancel each other.
1458:
1459:
1460: As a result, we obtain
1461: \begin{equation}
1462: \Pi _{\mu \nu } \left( q \right) = \frac{2}{\pi }\left( {q^2 \delta
1463: _{\mu \nu } - q_\mu q_\nu } \right)\left[ {\frac{M}{{2q^2 }} +
1464: \frac{{q^2 - 4M^2 }}{{4q^3 }}\sin ^{ - 1} \frac{q}{{\sqrt {q^2 +
1465: 4M^2 } }}} \right].
1466: \end{equation}
1467: Expaiding the right hand side with respect to $q$,
1468: we obtain
1469: \begin{equation}
1470: \Pi _{\mu \nu } \left( q \right) = \frac{1}{{3\pi M}}\left( {q^2
1471: \delta _{\mu \nu } - q_\mu q_\nu } \right)\left[ {1 -
1472: \frac{1}{{10}}\left( {\frac{q}{M}} \right)^2 + \frac{1}{{560}}\left
1473: ( {\frac{q}{M}} \right)^4 + ...} \right].
1474: \end{equation}
1475:
1476:
1477: On the other hand, the Maxwell term has the following form
1478: \begin{equation}
1479: S_M = \frac{1}{{2e_A^2 }}\sum\limits_q {\left( {q^2 \delta _{\mu \nu
1480: } - q_\mu q_\nu } \right)A_\mu \left( { - q} \right)A_\nu \left
1481: ( q \right)}
1482: \end{equation}
1483: Thus, we obtain $e^2 = 3\pi M$.
1484: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1485: % End of the derivation of the Maxwell term (Dec.8/2005)
1486: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1487:
1488: \section{The band narrowing factor}
1489: \label{sec_DWF}
1490: In this appendix, we evaluate the band narrowing factor omitted in
1491: eq.(\ref{eq_Hbar}).
1492: The canonical transformation (\ref{eq_canonical}) introduces the
1493: following factor in the hopping term,
1494: \begin{equation}
1495: X_i^\dag X_j = \exp \left[ {\frac{{e_A }}{{\sqrt {2\Omega }
1496: }}\sum\limits_q {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }}\left( {a_{ - q}^\dag - a_q
1497: } \right)e^{iq \cdot R_i } } } \right]\exp \left[ { - \frac{{e_A
1498: }}{{\sqrt {2\Omega } }}\sum\limits_q {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3 }}\left
1499: ( {a_{ - q}^\dag - a_q } \right)e^{iq \cdot R_j } } } \right].
1500: \end{equation}
1501: By taking the thermal average with respect to the bosons, we obtain
1502: \begin{equation}
1503: \left\langle {X_i^\dag X_j } \right\rangle = \exp \left[ { -
1504: \frac{{e_A^2 }}{{2\Omega }}\sum\limits_q {\frac{1}{{\omega _q^3
1505: }}\coth \left( {\frac{{\beta \omega _q }}{2}} \right)\left( {1 - \cos
1506: \left[ {q \cdot \left( {R_i - R_j } \right)} \right]} \right)} }
1507: \right].
1508: \end{equation}
1509: The calculation is similar to eqs.(\ref{eq_delta}) and (\ref{eq_ell}).
1510: Thus,
1511: \begin{equation}
1512: \left\langle {X_i^\dag X_j } \right\rangle \simeq 0.7
1513: \end{equation}
1514: The hopping amplitude is somewhat reduced by the band narrowing
1515: factor.
1516:
1517: \begin{thebibliography}{99} %% The number "99" means that this list
1518: %% has more than nine items.
1519: \bibitem{WELLS_ETAL}B.~O.~Wells, Z.-X.~Shen,
1520: A.~Matsuura, D.~M.~King, M.~A.~Kastner, M.~Greven,
1521: and R.~J.~Birgeneau,
1522: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74}, 964 (1995).
1523: \bibitem{RONNING_ETAL}
1524: F.~Ronning, C.~Kim, D.~L.~Feng, D.~S.~Marshall, A.~G.~Loeser,
1525: L.~L.~Miller, J.~N.~Eckstein, I.~Bozovic, and Z.-X.~Shen,
1526: Science {\bf 282}, 2067 (1998).
1527: \bibitem{SHEN_RMP} See, for a review, A.~Damascelli, Z.~Hussain, and
1528: Z.~X.~Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 75}, 473 (2003).
1529: \bibitem{SHEN_ETAL}K.M. Shen, F. Ronning, D.H. Lu, W.S. Lee,
1530: N.J.C. Ingle, W. Meevasana, F. Baumberger, A. Damascelli,
1531: N.P. Armitage, L.L. Miller, Y. Kohsaka, M. Azuma, M. Takano,
1532: H. Takagi, and Z.-X. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 267002 (2004).
1533: \bibitem{BOZ95}
1534: J.~Ba{\l}a, A.~M.~Oles, and J.~Zaanen, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 52}, 4597
1535: (1995).
1536: \bibitem{tttJ}
1537: T.~Xiang and J.~M.~Wheatley, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, R12 653
1538: (1996);B.~Kyung and R.~A.~Ferrell, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 10125
1539: (1996);T.~K.~Lee and C.~T.~Shih, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, 5983 (1997);
1540: T.~K.~Lee, C.-M.~Ho, and N.~Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 067001
1541: (2003); T.~Tohyama and S.~Maekawa, Supercond. Sci. Technol. {\bf
1542: 13}, R17 (2000).
1543: \bibitem{TJ_fail} Z.~Liu and E.~Manousakis,
1544: Phys. Rev. B 45, 2425 (1992).
1545: \bibitem{TJ_fail2}
1546: E.~Dagotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994).
1547: \bibitem{MN04}A.~S.~Mishchenko and N.~Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf
1548: 93}, 036402 (2004).
1549: \bibitem{AFFLECK_MARSTON}I.~Affleck and J.~B.~Marston, Phys. Rev. B
1550: {\bf 37}, R3774 (1988); J.~B.~Marston and I.~Affleck, Phys. Rev. B
1551: {\bf 39}, 11538 (1989).
1552: \bibitem{AL91}A.~Auerbach and B.~E.~Larson, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 66},
1553: 2262 (1991).
1554: \bibitem{LAUGHLIN97}R.~B.~Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1726 (1997).
1555: \bibitem{MARSTON}J.~B.~Marston, Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 64}, 1166
1556: (1990).
1557: \bibitem{KIM_LEE}D.~H.~Kim and P.~A.~Lee, Ann. Phys. {\bf 272}, 130
1558: (1999).
1559: \bibitem{RONNING_ETALUN}F.~Ronning, C.~Kim, Z.-X.~Shen, and
1560: L.~L.~Miller, unpublished.
1561: \bibitem{TF01}M~Franz and Z.~Te\u{s}anovi\'{c}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf
1562: 87}, 257003 (2001).
1563: \bibitem{BFN99}L.~Balents, M.~P.~A.~Fisher, and C.~Nayak, Phys. Rev. B
1564: {\bf 60}, 1654 (1999).
1565: \bibitem{HERBUT}
1566: Z.~Te\u{s}anovi\'{c}, O.~Vafek and M.~Franz,
1567: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 180511(R) (2002);
1568: I.~F.~Herbut, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 047006 (2002).
1569: \bibitem{AM96}I.~J.~R.~Aitchison and N.~E.~Mavromatos, Phys. Rev. B
1570: {\bf 53}, 9321 (1996) and references cited therein.
1571: \bibitem{RW}W.~Rantner and X.-G.~Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 3871
1572: (2001);Phys. Rev. B {\bf 66}, 144501 (2002).
1573: \bibitem{KHVESHCHENKO}See, also, D.~V.~Khveshchenko, Phys. Rev. B {\bf
1574: 65}, 235111 (2002).
1575: \bibitem{WEN_LEE} X.-G.~Wen and P.~A.~Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 76},
1576: 503 (1996).
1577: \bibitem{RS90}N.~Read and S.~Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 42},
1578: 4568 (1990).
1579: \bibitem{CHUBUKOV}A.~Chubukov, Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 44}, 12318 (1991).
1580: \bibitem{QED3_confinement}C.~J.~Burden, J.~Praschifka, and
1581: C.~D.~Roberts, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 46}, 2695 (1992);
1582: P.~Maris, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 52}, 6087 (1995);
1583: G.~Grignani, G.~Semenoff and P.~Sodano, Phys.~Rev. D {\bf 53}, 7157
1584: (1996).
1585: \bibitem{MAHAN}G.~D.~Mahan, {\it Many-Particle Physics} (Plenum, New
1586: York, 1990), 2nd edition.
1587: \bibitem{TM05}T.~Morinari, cond-mat/0507666, to be published in
1588: Phys. Rev. B; cond-mat/0502437.
1589: \bibitem{KOGUT83} J.~B.~Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 55}, 775 (1983).
1590: \bibitem{Nagaosa_Lee} N.~Nagaosa and P.~A.~Lee,
1591: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 64}, 2450 (1990).
1592: \bibitem{Ioffe_Wiegmann} L.~B.~Ioffe and P.~B.~Wiegmann,
1593: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 65}, 653 (1990).
1594: \bibitem{IR}R.~Jackiw and S.~Templeton, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 23}, 2291
1595: (1981).
1596: \bibitem{SD}
1597: T.~W.~Appelquist, M.~Bowick, D.~Karabali and
1598: L.~C.~R.~Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 33}, 3704 (1986);
1599: \bibitem{IR_mass}T.~Appelquist, D.~Nash and
1600: L.~C.~R.~Wijewardhana, Phys.~Rev.~Lett. {\bf 60}, 2575 (1988).
1601: \bibitem{KN}K.~Kondo and H.~Nakatani, Mod. Phys. Lett. A{\bf 4}, 2155
1602: (1989).
1603: %Prog. Theor. Phys. 87, 193 (1992).
1604: \bibitem{QMC}B.~B.~Beard, R.~J.~Birgeneau, M.~Greven, and U.~J.~Wiese,
1605: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 1742 (1998);
1606: J.-K.~Kim and M.~Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 80}, 2705 (1998).
1607: \bibitem{HH69}B.~I.~Halperin and P.~C.~Hohenberg, Phys. Rev. {\bf
1608: 188}, 898 (1969).
1609: \bibitem{CHN} S.~Chakravarty, B.~I.~Halperin, and D.~R.~Nelson,
1610: Phys.~Rev.~B {\bf 39}, 2344 (1989).
1611: \bibitem{HN93}P.~Hasenfratz and F.~Niedermayer, Z. Phys. B 92, 91
1612: (1993).
1613: \bibitem{dim_reg} See, for example, P. Ramond,
1614: {\it Field Theory: A Modern Primer}
1615: (Addison-Wesley, 1989).
1616: %\bibitem{t_prime_J_model}P.~B.~Wiegmann, Phys. Rev. Lee. {\bf 60},
1617: %821 (1988);X.-G.~Wen, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 39}, 7223 (1989); R.~Shankar,
1618: %Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 63}, 203 (1989); P.~A.~Lee,
1619: %Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 63}, 680 (1989).
1620: \end{thebibliography}
1621:
1622: \end{document}
1623:
1624: %%%%%%%%%% Figure %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1625: \begin{figure}[htbp]
1626: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{*.eps}
1627: \caption{}
1628: \label{fig_*}
1629: \end{figure}
1630: