1: \documentclass[10pt,prd,twocolumn,tightlines,showpacs,preprintnumbers,aps,
2: floatfix,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: \begin{document}
4: \input psfig.tex
5: \title{Stochastic Quantisation and Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics}
6: \author{Jayanta K. Bhattacharjee$^a$ and Debashis Gangopadhyay$^b$}
7: \affiliation {$^a$Indian Association For The Cultivation Of Science, Jadavpur,
8: Kolkata-700032, India , tpjkb@mahendra.iacs.res.in, $^b$S.N.Bose National Centre
9: For Basic Sciences,JD-Block, Sector-III,Salt Lake City,Kolkata-700098,India,
10: debashis@boson.bose.res.in}
11: \date{\today}
12: \begin{abstract}
13: The stochastic quantisation technique of Parisi and Wu is extended to study
14: non-equilibrium statistical mechanics. We show that this scheme is capable
15: of handling white as well as coloured noises.
16:
17: \end{abstract}
18: \pacs{64.60.-i ; 64.60.Ak ; 64.60.Fr ; 64.60.Ht}
19: \maketitle
20: A quarter of a century back , Parisi and Wu [1] proposed a method of quantisation
21: based on a stochastic Langevin dynamics of a physical system in a fifth time $\tau$.
22: They showed that at the perturbative level, the usual quantum field thery (at the
23: level of the correlation functions) was recovered in the $\tau\rightarrow\infty$
24: of this dynamics. In this work, we extend this technique to study non-equilibrium
25: statistical mechanics.
26:
27: To study systems out of equilibrium, the usual practice is
28: to use response fields [2].
29: These are used to determine propagators and correlators.
30: As these are unrelated, one has to separarately calculate them.
31:
32: In the stochastic quantisation scheme propagators and correlation functions
33: in the fictitous "time" dimension are related in the usual way.
34: Moreover, the equilibrium limit , {\it viz.} $\tau\rightarrow\infty$
35: gives back the real time propagators and correlation functions.
36: This way of looking at the problem allows us the luxury of a
37: fluctuation-dissipation in the fictitous time and what is more
38: important, our procedure works unaltered even when the real time
39: noise source is coloured.
40:
41: {\bf 1. Parisi-Wu Stochastic Quantisation }
42:
43: We begin with a brief review. Euclidean quantum field theoretic correlation functions
44: for the field $\phi$ corresponding to an action $S[\phi]$ are given by [1,3]
45: $$<0\vert T\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})...\phi(x_{l})\vert 0>$$
46: $$={\int D\phi[\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})..\phi(x_{l})]e^{-S[\phi]}\over \int D\phi e^{-S[\phi]}}\eqno(1)$$
47: Parisi and Wu proposed the following alternative method:
48:
49: (a)Introduce an extra fictitous "time" dimension $\tau$ in addition to the four spacetime
50: $x^{\mu}$ and postulate a Langevin dynamics of the field $\phi$ in the "time" $\tau$ as
51: $${\partial \phi(x,t,\tau)\over\partial \tau} = - {\delta S\over\delta \phi} + \eta (x,t,\tau)\eqno(2)$$
52: where $\eta$ is a gaussian random variable satisfying $<\eta(x,t,\tau)>_{\eta}=0$;
53: $<\eta(x,t,\tau)\eta(x',t',\tau')>_{\eta}= 2\delta (x-x')\delta (t-t')\delta (\tau - \tau ')$
54:
55: (b)Evaluate the stochastic average of the fields $\phi_{\eta}$ satisfying $(2)$ {\it viz.}
56: $$<\phi(x_{1},\tau_{1})\phi(x_{2},\tau_{2})...\phi(x_{l},\tau_{l})>_{\eta}$$
57: (c)Put $\tau_{1}=\tau_{2}=...\tau_{l}$ and take the limit $\tau_{1}\rightarrow\infty$.
58: Then one has
59: $$lim_{\tau_{1}\rightarrow\infty}<\phi(x_{1},\tau_{1})\phi(x_{1},\tau_{1})...\phi(x_{l},\tau_{1})>_{\eta}$$
60: $$={\int D\phi[\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})..\phi(x_{l})]e^{-S[\phi]}\over \int D\phi e^{-S[\phi]}}\eqno(3)$$
61: Thus the real time correlation functions are obtained in the equilibrium limit of the
62: fictitous time $\tau$.Why this is possible is understood from the associated Fokker-Planck dynamics.
63: The probability of finding the system in the configuration $\phi$ at time $t$ is $P(\phi,t)$
64: and the evolution of $P$ in time $t$ is governed by the Fokker-Planck equation
65: $${\partial P \over\partial t}={\delta^{2} P\over\delta \phi^{2}} +
66: {\delta\over\delta \phi}\Bigl(P {\delta S\over\delta \phi}\Bigr)\eqno(4)$$
67: The above equation can be recast into Schroedinger-type equation
68: ${\partial\Psi\over\partial t}=-2H^{FP}\Psi$
69: with $\Psi\equiv P(\phi,t)e^{S[\phi]/2}$ and
70: $$H^{FP}= -(1/2){\delta^{2}\over\delta \phi{^2}}+(1/8)\Bigl({\delta S\over\delta \phi}\Bigr)^{2}
71: -(1/4){\delta^{2} S\over\delta \phi^{2}}\eqno(5)$$
72: The Fokker-Planck hamiltonian $H^{FP}$ is positive semi-definite with
73: ground state energy zero and ground state $\Psi_{0}=e^{-S[\phi]/2}$ and
74: $lim_{t\rightarrow\infty} P(\phi,t)=constant\enskip e^{-S[\phi]/2}$.
75:
76: {\bf 2.The Edwards-Wilkinson (EW) Model}
77:
78: One of the earliest models for surface growth is the linear Edwards-Wilkinson
79: model [4] described by the equation of motion
80: $${\partial h(x,t)\over\partial t}= \nu\nabla ^ {2} h(x,t)+\beta(x,t) + c\eqno(6a) $$
81: where $h$ is the surface's position,$\beta$ the stochastic white noise and $c$ the
82: constant average velocity of the propagating surface.$\beta$ satisfies
83: $$<\beta (x_{1},t_{1})\beta (x_{2},t_{2})>
84: = 2\epsilon\delta (x_{2}-x_{1})\delta (t_{2}-t_{1})\eqno(6b)$$
85: It can be shown that corresponding to the Langevin equation
86: $${\partial h(x,t)\over\partial t}= -{\delta S\over\delta h} + \beta (x,t)\eqno(7)$$
87: the Hamiltonian
88: $H_{EW}=\nu/2 \int dx (\nabla h)^{2}$ gives back equation $(6a)$.
89: We apply the technique first to the Edwards-Wilkinson model which is a linear
90: theory.The model is described in real time $t$ by the equations $(7)$ or $(6)$.
91:
92: The probability distribution associated with $\beta$ is
93: $$P(\beta)\propto e^{-{1\over 2\epsilon}\int d^{D}xdt \beta(x,t)^{2}}
94: = e^{-{1\over 2\epsilon}\int d^{D}xdt
95: ({\partial h\over\partial t}-\nu\nabla^{2} h)^{2}}\eqno(8a)$$
96: $$=e^{-{1\over 2\epsilon}\int
97: {d^{D}k \over (2\pi)^{D}}{d\omega\over 2\pi}
98: (\omega^{2}+\nu^{2}k^{4})h(k,\omega)h(-k,-\omega)}=e^{-S}$$
99: where
100: $$S= {1\over 2\epsilon}\int {d^{D}k \over (2\pi)^{D}}{d\omega\over 2\pi}
101: (\omega^{2}+\nu^{2}k^{4})h(k,\omega)h(-k,-\omega)\eqno(8b)$$
102: Introduce the fictitous time "$\tau$" such that
103: $${\partial h(k,\omega,\tau)\over\partial \tau}
104: = - {\delta S\over\delta h }
105: + \eta (k,\omega,\tau)\eqno(9a)$$
106: $$<\eta(k,\omega,\tau)\eta(k',\omega',\tau')
107: =2\delta(\tau-\tau')\delta(k+k')\delta(\omega+\omega')\eqno(9b)$$
108: $(9b)$ ensures that the "fluctuation-dissipation" theorem is satisfied
109: in $\tau$(even if it may not hold in real time $t$) and that as
110: $\tau\rightarrow\infty$,
111: $P(k,\omega,\tau)\rightarrow P(\beta)$ ,the equilibrium distribution.
112: To calculate the propagator, there are two approaches:
113:
114: {\bf (a) From $\tau$-variable Langevin Equation}
115:
116: The equation is
117: $${\partial h(x,t,\tau)\over\partial \tau} = \nu \nabla^{2} h(x,t,\tau) + \eta (x,t,\tau)\eqno(10)$$
118: The solution in momentum space is
119: $$h(k,\tau) = \int_{0}^{\infty} d\tau' e^{-\nu k^{2}(\tau-\tau')}\eta (k,\tau')$$
120: and the propagator is
121: $$<h(k,\omega,\tau)h(-k,-\omega,\tau')$$
122: $$={1\over\nu k^{2}}
123: [e^{\nu k^2\vert \tau-\tau'\vert}-e^{-\nu k^2\vert \tau+\tau'\vert}]
124: \delta (\tau-\tau')\eqno(11)$$
125: In the limit of $\tau=\tau'\rightarrow\infty$ all the usual EW results are obtained.
126:
127: {\bf (b) From the Fokker-Planck action}
128:
129: In the functional integral approach to stochastic quantisation [3], one has a
130: "euclidean" lagrangian $L^{FP}$ corresponding to $H^{FP}$
131: $$L^{FP}=(1/2)\Biggl({\partial h\over\partial \tau}\Biggr)^2
132: + (1/8)\Biggl({\delta S\over\delta h}\Biggr)^2
133: - (1/4)\Biggl({\delta^2 S\over\delta h^2}\Biggr)\eqno(12)$$
134: and the Fokker-Planck action is
135: $$S^{FP}=\int dx\enskip dt\enskip d\tau L^{FP}\eqno(13a)$$
136: In $(k,\omega,\omega_{\tau})$ space,
137: this action takes the form
138: $$S^{FP\enskip '}=\int ({dk\over 2\pi})({d\omega\over 2\pi})({d\omega_{\tau}\over 2\pi})$$
139: $$h(k,\omega,\omega_{\tau})
140: \Biggl(\omega_{\tau}^2 + + [(\omega^2+\nu ^{2}k^{4})]^{2}\Biggr)
141: h(-k,-\omega,\omega_{\tau})\eqno(13b)$$
142: Thus the height-height correlation function in configuration space is
143: $$<h(x,t,\tau)h(0,t',\tau ')>=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}({dk\over 2\pi})({d\omega\over 2\pi})({d\omega_{\tau}\over 2\pi})$$
144: $${e^{ikx - i\omega (t-t') - i\omega_{\tau} (\tau - \tau ')}\over
145: \omega_{\tau}^2 + (\omega^2+\nu ^{2}k^{4})^{2}}\eqno(14)$$
146: In our treatment the Langevin dynamics is effectively taken to start at
147: $\tau=-\infty$ so that at any finite time $\tau$, which is infinitely
148: removed from the starting time, we are already in the equilibrium distribution.
149: Putting $t=t', \tau=\tau'$ and completing the integrations give
150: $$<h(0)h(x)>\sim x^{1}\eqno(15)$$
151: so that the index $\alpha=1/2$.
152:
153: We now consider the scaling behaviour for the height variable $h$.
154: Assume ,for some length scale $L$, that
155: $t\sim L^z , h\sim L^\alpha$ in $D$ space dimensions.Note that we
156: regard $\tau$ as a parameter only and hence its scaling properties are meaningless.
157: This is more so justified as $\tau\rightarrow\infty$ gives us the usual
158: real time correlation functions. It readily follows that $\alpha=1 - D/2, z=2$
159: for $L^{FP\enskip '}$ as in equation $(17)$. So for $D=1$ , $\alpha= 1/2$.
160:
161: Note that if we had started from a modified Langevin equation of the form.
162: $$\Biggl({\partial h\over\partial t}\Biggr)= P\Biggl({\delta S\over\delta h}\Biggr) +\eta$$
163: the only change would have been a factor $P$ in front of the term proportional to
164: $\Biggl({\delta^{2} S\over\delta h^{2}}\Biggr)$ in the action.
165: But this term does not contribute to the model considered here and so there will
166: not be any change in our conclusions.
167:
168: {\bf 3. Edwards-Wilkinson model with with coloured Gaussian noise}
169:
170: For coloured Gaussian noise (in real time) the EW model is described by the equations
171: $${\partial h(x,t)\over\partial t}= \nu\nabla ^ {2} h(x,t)+\beta(x,t) \eqno(16) $$
172: $$<\beta (k_{1},\omega_{1})\beta (k_{2},\omega_{2})>
173: ={2\epsilon\over k_{1}^{2\rho}}\delta (k_{1}+k_{2})\delta(\omega_{1}+\omega_{2})\eqno(17)$$
174: $$P(\beta)\propto
175: =e^{-{1\over 2\epsilon}
176: \int {d^D k\over (2\pi)^D} {d\omega\over 2\pi}
177: k^{2\rho}(\omega^{2}+\nu^{2}k^{4})h(k,\omega)h(-k,-\omega)}\eqno(18)$$
178: Writing the fictitous time Langevin equation as
179: $${\partial h(k,\omega,\tau)\over\partial\tau}
180: =-k^{2\rho}(\omega^{2}+\nu^{2}k^{4})h(k,\omega,\tau) + \eta(k,\omega,\tau)\eqno(19)$$
181: where $\eta$ satisfies $(9b)$.The Fokker-Planck equation corresponding to $(9a)$ is
182: $${\partial P\over\partial \tau}
183: ={\partial\over\partial h(k,\omega)}(P {\partial S\over\partial h(-k,-\omega)})
184: +{\partial^{2} P\over\partial h(-k,w)\partial h(-k,\omega)}$$
185: The Fokker-Planck hamiltonian is now
186: $$H^{FP}= ({\delta h\over\delta \tau})^{2}+({1\over 2})\Bigl({\delta S\over\delta h}\Bigr)^{2}
187: -({1\over 4}){\delta^{2} S\over\delta h^{2}}\eqno(20)$$
188: So by going over to the fictitous time , it is always possible to write
189: a Fokker-Planck hamiltonian even if the original equation in real time
190: does not have the structure ${\partial h\over\partial t}=-{\delta\tilde S\over \delta h} +\eta$
191:
192: Proceeding as before the propagator in coordinate space in the limit
193: $\tau_{1}=\tau_{2}\rightarrow\infty$ is
194: $$<h(0)h(x)>=\int {dk e^{ikx}\over 2\pi}\int {dw\over 2\pi}{dw_{\tau}\over 2\pi}$$
195: $${1\over \omega_{\tau}^{2} + [k^{2\rho}(\omega^{2}+\nu^{2}k^{4})]^{2}}\sim x^{1+2\rho}$$
196: Therefore the index $\alpha=1/2 + \rho$.
197: \begin{figure}
198: \vbox{
199: \vskip 1.0cm
200: \hskip 0.5cm
201: \centerline{
202: \psfig{figure=dia.eps,height=6truecm,width=12truecm}}}
203: \vspace{0.0cm}
204: \caption{
205: }
206: \end{figure}
207: Now consider the model of Medina et al[ref.6]
208: $${\partial h(x,t,\tau)\over\partial t} = \nu \nabla^{2} h(x,t,\tau)
209: -(\lambda/2) (\nabla h)^{2}+ \beta (x,t)\eqno(21)$$
210: with $\beta$ satisfying $(17)$.The action is
211: $$S=(1/2)\int {d^{D}k\over (2\pi)^{D}}{d\omega\over 2\pi}
212: \Biggl( k^{2\rho}(\omega ^2+\nu ^2 k^4)h(k,\omega)h(-k,-\omega)$$
213: $$+\lambda k^{2\rho}\int{d^{D}p\over (2\pi)^{D}}{d\omega '\over 2\pi}$$
214: $$(i\omega+\nu k^2){\bf p.(k-p)}h({\bf p},\omega ')h({\bf k-p},\omega-\omega ')h({\bf -k,-\omega})$$
215: $$-\lambda k^{2\rho}\int{d^{D}p\over (2\pi)^{D}}{d\omega '\over 2\pi}$$
216: $$(-i\omega+\nu k^2){\bf p.(k+p)}h({\bf p},\omega ')h({\bf -k-p},-\omega-\omega ')h({\bf k,\omega})$$
217: $$-\lambda k^{2\rho}\int {d^{D}p\over (2\pi)^{D}}{d^{D}q\over (2\pi)^{D}}{d\omega_{1}\over 2\pi}
218: {d\omega_{2}\over 2\pi}$$
219: $$[{\bf p.(k-p)}][{\bf q.(k-q)}]h({\bf p},\omega_{1})
220: h({\bf k-p},\omega-\omega_{1})$$
221: $$h({\bf q},\omega_{2})h({\bf k-q},\omega-\omega_{2})\Biggr)\eqno(22)$$
222:
223: In fictitous time the Langevin eqution is
224: $${\partial h(k,\omega,\tau)\over\partial \tau}
225: = - {\delta S\over\delta h(-k,-\omega,\tau)}
226: + \eta (k,\omega,\tau)\eqno(23a)$$
227: $$<\eta(k,\omega,\tau)\eta(k',\omega',\tau')
228: =2\delta(\tau-\tau')\delta(k+k')\delta(\omega+\omega')\eqno(23b)$$
229: $(23b)$ ensures that the "fluctuation-dissipation" theorem is satisfied
230: in $\tau$.The evolution to the equilibrium limit is governed by
231: $S^{FP\enskip '}$ constructed from the action $S$ as in $(22)$
232: and using $(12)$ and $(13)$.
233: The fluctuation-dissipation theorem relates the connected
234: two point function to the imaginary part of the response function i.e.
235: $$C = {1\over\omega_{\tau}}Im G\eqno(24)$$
236: where $C$ refers to connected part of the two-point function in fictitous time $\tau$
237: and $G$ refers to the full response function.
238: The full response function has the structure
239: $$G= {1\over -i\omega_{\tau}+k^{2\rho}(\omega^{2}+k^{2z})}$$
240: while
241: $$C={1\over k^{4\rho}(\omega^{2}+k^{2z})^{2})+\omega_{\tau}^{2}}=G^{0}G^{0 *}$$
242:
243: Upto one loop level the relevant diagrams are in fig.1. Of these the first
244: one is like a mass insertion vertex (of perturbation order $O(\lambda)$)
245: and hence ignorable.However, the second one ($O(\lambda^{2})$)
246: depends on the external momenta.Now considering upto one loop level
247: $$G^{-1}\approx G^{-1 (0)}-\Sigma$$
248: where $\Sigma$ contains the relevant one loop contribution, i.e. the second
249: diagram. Denoting by $V$ the contribution from the vertex
250: $$\Sigma=\int {d^{D}p\over (2\pi)^{D}}
251: {d\omega\over (2\pi)} {d\omega_{\tau}\over (2\pi)}VVGC$$
252:
253: Now consider the momentum behaviour.
254: Noting that $\nu k^{2} \simeq k^{z}$,
255: the second diagram gives $\Sigma$ behaviour
256: as $\sim G^{-1}\sim k^{2\rho+2z}$.The vertex $V$ behaves as
257: $\sim k^{2\rho}\nu k^{2}.k^{2}\sim k^{2\rho+z+2}$,
258: while dimensional matching implies that $\omega\sim k^{z}$.
259: Therefore $k^{2\rho+2z}=k^{D+z+4\rho+2z+4-4\rho-4z}$.
260: This gives $z={1\over 3}(D+4-2\rho)$.
261:
262: This result agrees exactly with what is found in
263: refs. (4) and (5). Since we expect results to be more singular
264: with $\rho > 0 $, we expect the validity of our calculation
265: only for that range of $\rho $ for which $ z $ is smaller than the
266: corresponding $z$ for the KPZ problem. For $ D=1$, this restricts
267: the validity of our analysis to $\rho >1/4$, which is exactly
268: what was found in ref.(5). In summary, then we have a technique
269: where the out-of-equilibrium system with a coloured noise
270: can be handled by techniques of equilibrium statistical physics.
271:
272:
273:
274: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
275: [1] G.Parisi and Y.S.Wu, {\it Sci.Sin.} {\bf 24}, 484 (1981).\\
276:
277: [2]P.C.Martin,E.D.Siggia and H.A.Rose, {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf A8},423 (1973);
278: R.Bausch,H.K.Janssen and H.Wagner, {\it Z.Phys.} {\bf B24},113 (1976);
279: C.D. Dominicis and L.Peliti, {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf B18},353 (1978);
280: E.Frey and U.C.Tauber, {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf E50},1024 (1994).\\
281:
282: [3] E.Gozzi, {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf D28}, 1922 (1983).\\
283:
284: [4]S.F.Edwards and D.R.Wilkinson, {\it Proc.R.Soc.London} {\bf A381},17 (1982).\\
285:
286: [5] M.Kardar, G.Parisi and Y. Zhang, {\it Phys.Rev.Lett.} {\bf 56}, 889 (1986).\\
287:
288: [6] E.Medina, T.Hwa, M.Kardar and Y.Zhang, {\it Phys.Rev.} {\bf A39}, 3053 (1989).\\
289:
290: [7] A.Kr.Chattopadhyay and J.K.Bhattacharjee,
291: {\it Europhys.Lett.} {\bf 42},119 (1998).\\
292:
293: \end{thebibliography}
294: \end{document}
295:
296: