1: \documentclass[aps,prb,showpacs,twocolumn]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}
5: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
6: \newcommand{\bmat}{\left(\begin{array}}
7: \newcommand{\emat}{\end{array}\right)}
8: \newcommand{\no}{\nonumber}
9: \newcommand{\e}{\epsilon}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: \title{Mesoscopic conductance fluctuations in a coupled quantum dot system}
13: \author{Kazutaka Takahashi}
14: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology,
15: Tokyo 152--8551, Japan}
16: \affiliation{Condensed Matter Theory Laboratory, RIKEN,
17: Saitama 351--0198, Japan}
18: \author{Tomosuke Aono}
19: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Ben--Gurion University of the Negev,
20: Beer--Sheva 84105, Israel}
21: \date{\today}
22:
23: \begin{abstract}
24: We study the transport properties of
25: an Aharonov--Bohm ring containing two quantum dots.
26: One of the dots has well--separated resonant levels, while
27: the other is chaotic and is treated by random matrix theory.
28: We find that the conductance through the ring
29: is significantly affected by mesoscopic fluctuations.
30: The Breit--Wigner resonant peak is changed to
31: an antiresonance by increasing the ratio of the level broadening
32: to the mean level spacing of the random dot.
33: The asymmetric Fano form turns into a symmetric one
34: and the resonant peak can be controlled by magnetic flux.
35: The conductance distribution function clearly shows
36: the influence of strong fluctuations.
37: \end{abstract}
38: \pacs{
39: 73.21.La, % Quantum dots
40: 73.23.-b, % Electronic transport in mesoscopic systems
41: 05.60.Gg, % Quantum transport
42: 05.45.Gg % Control of chaos, applications of chaos
43: }
44: \maketitle
45:
46: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
47: %\section{Introduction}
48:
49: The quantum dot~\cite{Beenakker, Alhassid} (QD) is an ideal system to
50: study the phase coherence of quantum mechanical wave functions.
51: Such effects can be explained by the interference of different pathways,
52: induced by elastic scattering from an irregular boundary and/or
53: impurities.
54: When a dot is connected to leads, there is a strong overlap between
55: the dot and leads and we must treat the whole as a quantum system.
56: In fact, a recent numerical calculation of a chaotic dot
57: shows that there are scars that connect between the leads.~\cite{SI}
58:
59: The coexistence of a direct path and discrete levels
60: in the dot induces a prominent effect, the Fano effect.~\cite{Fano}
61: It was shown in QD systems~\cite{KAKI, JMHG} that asymmetric Fano peaks
62: can be controlled by gate voltages and magnetic fields.
63: The work in Ref.~\onlinecite{KAKI} demonstrated that an Aharonov-Bohm
64: (AB) ring is a suitable system to study this effect.
65: A dot is embedded in one of the arms,
66: and the ring geometry is utilized as an interferometer.
67: This effect has also been observed in other experiments, including
68: a microwave cavity~\cite{RLBKS} and optical absorption.~\cite{FCSWP}
69:
70: The situation changes drastically
71: if we take into account mesoscopic fluctuations.
72: A random distribution of levels in the dot leads to
73: sample--to--sample fluctuations of the conductance.
74: In contrast to bulk systems, such fluctuations cannot be neglected
75: in QD systems, and the conductance distribution has
76: a broad non--Gaussian shape.~\cite{PEI}
77: It was observed in a QD system~\cite{HPMBDH}
78: and in a chaotic microwave cavity.~\cite{HZOAA}
79: Clerk {\it et al.} developed a statistical theory
80: of Fano peaks assuming a random distribution of peaks.~\cite{CWB}
81: These authors focused on resonance--to--resonance fluctuations of
82: the asymmetric Fano form, rather than conductance fluctuations.
83:
84: In this paper we develop a statistical theory
85: of the AB ring with two QDs in the arms.
86: In addition to a resonant dot in one of the arms,
87: a random dot is connected to the other arm
88: and is treated by random matrix theory (RMT).~\cite{Mehta}
89: The orbit through the resonance is correlated to
90: those through the random levels,
91: and strong fluctuations can be observed in the conductance.
92: We show that the Breit--Wigner and Fano resonant forms
93: are no longer maintained in the averaged conductance.
94:
95: We focus on the following two issues.
96: First, we examine the properties of those orbits that
97: contribute to the conductance.
98: Motivated by the work of Ref.~\onlinecite{CWB}, we take into account
99: the direct nonresonant path in the random dot as well as
100: the Breit--Wigner resonant path in the regular dot.
101: We show that these two channels give qualitatively different
102: contributions to the conductance in the presence of random levels.
103: Second, the level broadening of the random dot.
104: For an open dot, the broadening can be larger than
105: the mean level spacing due to strong coupling to the
106: leads.~\cite{Beenakker, Alhassid}
107: We systematically change the broadening from small to large values
108: to elucidate how this parameter affects the results.
109:
110: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
111: %\section{Model}
112:
113: Our system is defined by the internal Hamiltonian
114: for the two QDs and their couplings to the left and right leads.
115: It is depicted in the upper left inset in Fig.~\ref{xeg}(a).
116: We assume that one of the dots (dot 1) has regular resonant levels
117: and the level spacing is much larger than the level broadening.
118: In this case, each of the levels can be treated independently.
119: The other dot (dot 2) is relatively large and
120: has many levels distributed randomly.
121: As is known from scattering theory
122: (see, e.g., Refs.~\onlinecite{Beenakker, Alhassid},
123: and \onlinecite{VWZ}),
124: the $S$ matrix of the system is written as
125: \be
126: S = 1-2\pi i w^\dag\frac{1}{E-H+i\pi ww^\dag}w, \label{S}
127: \ee
128: where $H=H_1\oplus H_2$ denotes the Hamiltonian
129: for the QDs, $w$ is the dot--lead coupling, and
130: $E$ is the (Fermi) energy.
131: We adopt a single--level Hamiltonian $H_1=E_1$ for dot 1.
132: $H_2$ for dot 2 is a member of the Gaussian unitary
133: ensemble~\cite{Mehta} and its size $N$
134: is taken to be infinity to find the universal limit.
135: We assume that the $S$ matrix is a $2\times 2$ matrix,
136: which means the left and right leads have a single channel respectively.
137: The conductance, measured in units of $2e^2/h$,
138: is calculated from $g = \langle |S_{12}|^2\rangle$.
139:
140: In the present RMT approach,
141: there is no need to know the full form of $w$.
142: The matrix $w$ appears in the $S$ matrix formula (\ref{S})
143: as $w^\dag G w$, where $G=(E^+-H)^{-1}$.
144: After the averaging, the matrix structure of $G$ is lost and
145: $2\times 2$ matrices $\gamma_{i} = \pi w^{(i)\dag} w^{(i)}$
146: appear in averaged quantities.
147: Here $i=1,2$ label the dot and $w^{(1)}$($w^{(2)}$) is
148: a $1\times 2$ ($N\times 2$) matrix.
149: Assuming a symmetric coupling with respect to the left and right leads,
150: we arrive at the general form
151: \be
152: \gamma_1 = \frac{\Gamma_1}{2}\bmat{cc} 1 & e^{i\varphi} \\
153: e^{-i\varphi} & 1 \emat, \
154: \gamma_2 = \frac{N\Gamma_2}{2}\bmat{cc} 1 & ae^{-i\varphi} \\
155: ae^{i\varphi} & 1 \emat,
156: \ee
157: where $\Gamma_i$ is the level broadening of the dot $i$
158: and $\varphi$ is the AB flux.~\cite{GIA-KK}
159: The real parameter $a$ ($0\leq a\leq 1$) represents the strength of
160: the nonresonant direct path since the off--diagonal part of $\gamma$
161: contributes to the conductance directly.~\cite{VWZ}
162:
163: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
164: %\section{Averaged S matrix}
165:
166: The averaged S matrix is calculated from the relation
167: $(1-\langle S\rangle)/(1+\langle S\rangle)
168: =(1-S_1)/(1+S_1)+(1-\langle S_2\rangle)(1+\langle S_2\rangle)$,
169: where $S_{1,2}$ are the $S$ matrices of the dot $1,2$ respectively.
170: In RMT the magnitude of the Gaussian fluctuations
171: determines the mean level spacing $\Delta$.
172: Then the averaged Green's function of the dot 2 is given by
173: $\langle G\rangle = -i\pi/N\Delta$,
174: where we take the limit $N\to\infty$ and neglect the real part of $G$.
175: In this limit we obtain
176: $\langle S_2\rangle = (1-\pi\gamma_2/N\Delta)/(1+\pi\gamma_2/N\Delta)$
177: while $S_1=(E-E_1-i\gamma_1)/(E-E_1+i\gamma_1)$.
178: $\langle S \rangle$ is determined by the following four parameters:
179: $a$, $\varphi$, $\e = (E-E_1)/\Gamma_1$, and $X = \pi\Gamma_2/\Delta$.
180: $\e$ measures the distance from the resonance point of the regular dot
181: and $X$ represents the ratio of the level broadening to
182: the level spacing for the random dot.
183: When $X \gg 1$, the level spectrum is continuous.
184: The use of RMT implies our consideration is restricted
185: to the energy scale much smaller than the Thouless energy.
186:
187: If we disregard quantum fluctuations, the conductance is given by
188: $g_0=|\langle S_{12}\rangle|^2$,
189: which we call the principal part of $g$.
190: It is given by the Fano form
191: \be
192: g_0 &=& \frac{a^2 X^2}{\left[1+(1+a)X/2\right]^2
193: \left[1+(1-a)X/2\right]^2} \no\\
194: & & \times\frac{\left|E-E_1+q\Gamma_1\right|^2}
195: {(E-E_1)^2
196: +\frac{\left[1+(1-a \cos 2\varphi)X/2\right]^2}
197: {\left[1+(1+a)X/2\right]^2
198: \left[1+(1-a)X/2\right]^2}\Gamma_1^2}, \label{g0}
199: \ee
200: where $q = ie^{-2i\varphi}/a X$ is the Fano parameter.
201: This parameter is complex and becomes purely imaginary
202: when the AB flux $\varphi$ is zero,
203: which is contrasted with the experiments for clean
204: systems~\cite{KAKI, JMHG} where a real $q$ has been
205: observed in the absence of a magnetic field.
206: We also note that the result of Eq.(\ref{g0}) holds
207: regardless of the choice of the universality class
208: because the resonance is not treated
209: randomly, in contrast with the approach in Ref.~\onlinecite{CWB}.
210: When $a=0$, $|q|\to\infty$ and the result reduces to
211: the standard Breit--Wigner form.
212: The presence of the random dot leads to a reduction of the level
213: broadening and the conductance by a factor of $1/(1+X/2)^2$.
214:
215: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
216: %\section{Nonlinear $\sigma$ model and transmissiona coefficients}
217:
218: We now consider mesoscopic fluctuations of the conductance
219: $\delta g = g-g_0$.
220: We calculate these using the method of supersymmetry,~\cite{VWZ}
221: which allows us to derive the nonlinear $\sigma$ model
222: \be
223: F = \frac{1}{2}\mbox{str}_8 \ln\left(1+\frac{T/2}{1-T/2}
224: \frac{\Lambda\sigma+\sigma\Lambda}{2}\right),
225: \ee
226: where the $4\times 4$ supermatrix $\sigma$ parametrizes
227: the saddle point manifold and satisfies $\sigma^2=1$.~\cite{Efetov}
228: $\mbox{str}$ denotes the supertrace
229: and $\Lambda=\mbox{diag}(1,-1)$ in retarded--advanced space.
230: The $2\times 2$ matrix $T$ defined by
231: $T = 1-\langle S\rangle\langle S\rangle^\dag$
232: is called the transmission coefficients.
233: This form of the $\sigma$ model is well known
234: as a standard model of a single random dot.
235: The only difference is in the $T$ matrix.
236: The fact that the $\sigma$ model is written
237: in terms of $T$ only demonstrates the universality of
238: the correlation functions of the S matrix elements.
239: For instance, $\delta g$ in Eq.(\ref{deltag}) is a function of $T$.
240: This is to be contrasted with the result of Eq.(\ref{g0}),
241: where such $T$ universality does not hold.
242: In the present model, we find the eigenvalues of $T$ at $a=0$
243: \be
244: T_1 = \frac{2X}{\left(1+X/2\right)^2}, \qquad
245: T_2 = \frac{2X}{\left(1+X/2\right)^2+1/\e^2}. \label{T12}
246: \ee
247: We see that $T_1$ is independent of $\e$.
248:
249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
250: %\section{Random S matrix approach}
251:
252: We present the analytical results for the conductance
253: together with numerical ones.
254: Numerical calculations are performed
255: using the random $S$ matrix model,~\cite{randomS}
256: where the internal structure of the $S$ matrix is disregarded and
257: randomness is imposed directly on $S$.
258: For the distribution of $S$, we use the generalized circular unitary
259: ensemble (CUE) based on the Poisson kernel~\cite{pker}
260: \be
261: P(S)d\mu =
262: \frac{\det(1-\langle S\rangle\langle S\rangle^\dag)^2}
263: {\left|\det(1-S\langle S\rangle^\dag)\right|^4} d\mu,
264: \ee
265: where $d\mu$ is the measure of the CUE.~\cite{Mehta}
266: This is the maximally randomized distribution
267: under the condition that the average value is $\langle S\rangle$.
268: Following the previous approach for regular systems~\cite{GIA-KK}
269: we separate the system into the dots 1 and 2,
270: and the left and right forks that connect the dots to leads.
271: Choosing the fork $S$ matrix in a symmetric form
272: we find the transmission through the ring expressed
273: by the $S$ matrix $S_{1,2}$ for each dot.
274: $S_2$ is treated statistically using a Poisson kernel.
275: This random $S$ matrix approach is equivalent to
276: the random Hamiltonian approach if $\langle S\rangle$ is
277: chosen properly and $N\to\infty$.~\cite{Brouwer}
278: We use the same expressions for $S_1$ and $\langle S_2\rangle$
279: as in the random Hamiltonian approach.
280:
281: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
282: \begin{figure}[tb]
283: \begin{center}
284: \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{xg.eps}
285:
286: \medskip
287:
288: \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{eg.eps}
289: \caption{(Color Online)
290: Conductance vs $X=\pi\Gamma_2/\Delta$ (a)
291: and $\e=(E-E_1)/\Gamma_1$ (b) at $a=0$.
292: The thick (thin) lines are the total conductance $g$
293: (the principal part $g_0$).
294: Upper left inset in (a): Sketch of the sample.
295: The parameters characterizing each dot are shown in the figure.
296: Upper right inset in (a) and (b): Fluctuation part $\delta g=g-g_0$.
297: }
298: \label{xeg}
299: \end{center}
300: \end{figure}
301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
302:
303: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
304: %\section{Conductance}
305:
306: First we consider the $X$ dependence of the conductance at $a=0$.
307: When $\e\to\infty$, where the regular dot is detached
308: from the random dot, we have $T_1=T_2=2X/(1+X/2)^2$,
309: and recover the known result~\cite{Efetov2}
310: \be
311: g_0=0, \quad \delta g = \frac{T_1}{3}+\frac{T_1^2}{6}.
312: \label{deltag}
313: \ee
314: At the resonance point $\e=0$,
315: $T_1=2X/(1+X/2)^2$, $T_2=0$, and we obtain
316: \be
317: g_0 = \frac{1}{\left(1+X/2\right)^2}, \quad
318: \delta g = \frac{T_1}{4}=\frac{X/2}{\left(1+X/2\right)^2}. \label{grp}
319: \ee
320: In Fig.~\ref{xeg}(a), $X$ dependence of the conductance
321: is shown for several values of $\e$.
322: $g_0$ shows a peak at $X=0$
323: while $\delta g$ takes a maximum at $X=2$, as shown by
324: the thin lines and the inset in Fig.~\ref{xeg}(a), respectively.
325: As $\e\to\infty$
326: $g_0$ ($\delta g$) is monotonically decreasing (increasing)
327: and the result rapidly approaches Eq.(\ref{deltag}).
328:
329: $\e$ dependence of the conductance is shown in Fig.~\ref{xeg}(b).
330: A resonance peak appears at $\e=0$,
331: reflecting transport through the regular dot.
332: This peak structure, however, changes qualitatively as a function of $X$.
333: For small $X$ the peak is convex and
334: the peak height decreases on increasing $X$.
335: When $X=2$, $g$ is independent of $\e$.
336: Increasing $X$ further, we find that the peak turns into
337: an antiresonance and $g$ decreases monotonically.
338: The result for $X=2$ corresponds to that of
339: the CUE because $\langle S_2\rangle=0$, and
340: the Poisson kernel $P(S_2)$ becomes unity.
341:
342: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
343: \begin{figure}[tb]
344: \begin{center}
345: \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{fanog.eps}
346: \caption{(Color Online)
347: Conductance vs $\e$ at $a=0.7$ and $\varphi=\pi/8$.
348: The thick (thin) lines are the total conductance $g$
349: (principal part $g_0$).
350: Inset: Fluctuation part $\delta g$.}
351: \label{fanog}
352: \end{center}
353: \end{figure}
354: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
355:
356: % direct reaction model
357:
358: The obtained results are for a model with a resonance at $a=0$.
359: Now the question is whether they are characteristic of
360: the resonance model.
361: For comparison, we discuss the direct reaction model
362: with $a\ne 0$ and $\e\to\infty$.
363: Both models are similar in that
364: the conductance $g_0$ becomes finite in the absence of fluctuations.
365: $g_0$ becomes maximum at $a=1$,
366: which is similar to the situation at $\e=0$ in the resonance model.
367: In the direct reaction model,
368: the eigenvalues of the $T$ matrix are given by
369: \be
370: T_{1,2} = \frac{2(1\pm a)X}{\left[1+(1\pm a)X/2\right]^2}.
371: \ee
372: $T_2$ goes to zero as $a\to 1$ as in the limit $\e\to 0$ in Eq.(\ref{T12}).
373: In this limit, we find $T_1=4X/(1+X)^2$, $T_2=0$, and
374: \be
375: g_0 = \frac{X^2}{\left(1+X\right)^2}, \quad
376: \delta g = \frac{T_1}{4}=\frac{X}{\left(1+X\right)^2}.
377: \ee
378: Note that $T_1$ dependence of $\delta g$ is the same as in Eq.(\ref{grp})
379: but the $X$ dependence is different.
380: We have found numerically that
381: the peak is maintained for an arbitrary value of $X$ and
382: that there is no antiresonance, in contrast to the resonance model.
383:
384: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
385: %\section{Fano effect}
386:
387: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
388: \begin{figure}[b]
389: \begin{center}
390: \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{pg.eps}
391: \caption{(Color Online)
392: Conductance distribution at $a=0$.}
393: \label{pg}
394: \end{center}
395: \end{figure}
396: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
397:
398: As we have shown in Eq.(\ref{g0}), when we consider both the resonance
399: and direct reaction channels, the Fano effect appears in $g_0$.
400: In Fig.~\ref{fanog}, a typical numerical result of the conductance is shown
401: at $a=0.7$ and $\varphi=\pi/8$.
402: We observe that an asymmetric form is obtained for the fluctuation part
403: as well as for the principal part.
404: However, these asymmetric peaks work to compensate each other,
405: resulting in a symmetric $g$
406: that has a form similar to the previous result at $a=0$.
407: The difference is that the conductance as a whole is enhanced
408: due to the direct path contribution.
409: Far from the resonance point,
410: the conductance is independent of $\varphi$,
411: while it is sensitive at the resonance point.
412: The resonance (antiresonance) is amplified at $\varphi=0$ ($\pi/4$)
413: where the Fano parameter $q$ is pure imaginary (real).
414: When $q$ takes a complex value (when $0<\varphi<\pi/4$), a dip
415: in the resonance peak is formed at the intermediate values of $X$
416: (See the plot of $X=2$ in Fig.~\ref{fanog}).
417:
418: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
419: %\section{Conductance distribution function}
420:
421: As we have shown, $\delta g$ are of the order of $g_0$ and
422: the mere calculation of the averaged conductance is not enough
423: to characterize the system.
424: We show the numerical results for the conductance distribution function
425: $P(g)=\langle\delta (g-|S_{12}|^2)\rangle$ in Fig.~\ref{pg}.
426: For $\e\gg 1$ we find the results in Refs.~\onlinecite{PEI} and
427: \onlinecite{randomS} expressed in terms of $T_1$ in Eq.(\ref{T12}).
428: For finite value of $\e$, the $T$ universality does not hold and
429: the results essentially depend on $X$ and $\e$.
430: When $X<2$, the peak representing the resonant conductance
431: moves from $g=0$ to 1 as $\e$ decreases.
432: When $X>2$, the resonant conductance is suppressed
433: and the distribution function shows
434: the strong influence of the chaotic scattering.
435: When $\e=0$, two peaks appear at $g=0$ and $1$.
436: The peak at $g=0$ is larger (smaller) than that at $g=1$
437: when $X>2$ ($X<2$), which clearly shows the coexistence of
438: the contributions from both regular and chaotic dots.
439: At $X=2$, $P(g)$ is always symmetric and
440: is consistent with the results of the averaged conductance.
441: The curve for $\e=0$ is well fitted by the function
442: $P(g)=1/\pi\sqrt{g(1-g)}$.
443:
444: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
445: %\section{Dephasing}
446:
447: We remark on the effect of dephasing.
448: It can be simply studied by introducing
449: an imaginary part to the energy $E\to E+i/2\tau$.
450: The substitution of this to Eq.(\ref{g0})
451: leads to the reduction of the conductance.
452: The effect on the fluctuation part is to add
453: $F_\tau = (\Delta\tau)^{-1}\mbox{str}\,\sigma\Lambda$
454: to the $\sigma$ model.
455: Numerically we have observed that the fluctuation part is strongly
456: suppressed by this effect while the principal part shows
457: a small reduction.
458: This means that the resonance is preserved at any $X$.
459: We also anticipate that an asymmetric Fano resonance can be observed,
460: since the cancellation of the asymmetry between
461: the principal and fluctuation parts becomes incomplete.
462: The quantitative estimate of the dephasing effects
463: using the method in Ref.~\onlinecite{BB}
464: is necessary to compare with the experimental results, as was
465: done in Refs.~\onlinecite{HPMBDH} and \onlinecite{HZOAA}
466: for the single--dot systems.
467: A detailed study will be reported elsewhere.
468:
469: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
470: %\section{Universality class}
471:
472: Another interesting problem
473: is the ensemble dependence of the result.
474: Our numerical calculations using the orthogonal and symplectic
475: ensembles show that the distribution at
476: the resonant point (the lowest graph in Fig.~\ref{pg}) is
477: independent of the ensemble.
478: It implies the distribution is determined by some universal mechanism.
479:
480: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
481: %\section{Conclusions}
482:
483: In conclusion, we have developed a statistical theory
484: for an AB ring system with regular and chaotic QDs.
485: The conductance and its distribution are strongly influenced by
486: the mesoscopic fluctuations of the chaotic dot and
487: the position of the resonance peaks.
488:
489: We are grateful to A. Furusaki and S. Iida for useful discussions.
490: T.A. acknowledges support from
491: the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
492:
493: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
494: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
495: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
496:
497: \bibitem{Beenakker}
498: C.W.J. Beenakker, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 69}, 731 (1997).
499:
500: \bibitem{Alhassid}
501: Y. Alhassid, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 72}, 895 (2000).
502:
503: \bibitem{SI}
504: P.G. Silvestrov and Y. Imry, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 2565 (2000).
505:
506: \bibitem{Fano}
507: U. Fano, Phys. Rev. {\bf 124}, 1866 (1961).
508:
509: \bibitem{KAKI}
510: K. Kobayashi, H. Aikawa, S. Katsumoto, and Y. Iye,
511: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 256806 (2002);
512: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 68}, 235304 (2003).
513:
514: \bibitem{JMHG}
515: A.C. Johnson, C.M. Marcus, M.P. Hanson, and A.C. Gossard,
516: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 106803 (2004).
517:
518: \bibitem{RLBKS}
519: S. Rotter, F. Libisch, J. Burgd\"orfer, U. Kuhl, and H.-J. St\"ockmann,
520: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 69}, 046208 (2004).
521:
522: \bibitem{FCSWP}
523: J. Faist, F. Capasso, C. Sirtori, K.W. West, and L.N. Pfeiffer,
524: Nature (London) {\bf 390}, 589 (1997).
525:
526: \bibitem{PEI}
527: V.N. Prigodin, K.B. Efetov, and S. Iida,
528: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 71}, 1230 (1993);
529: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 51}, 17223 (1995).
530:
531: \bibitem{HPMBDH}
532: A.G. Huibers, S.R. Patel, C.M. Marcus, P.W. Brouwer,
533: C.I. Duru\"oz, and J.S. Harris, Jr.,
534: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 1917 (1998).
535:
536: \bibitem{HZOAA}
537: S. Hemmady, X. Zheng, E. Ott, T.M. Antonsen, and S.M. Anlage,
538: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 014102 (2005);
539: S. Hemmady, X. Zheng, J. Hart, T.M. Antonsen, Jr., E. Ott,
540: and S.M. Anlage, cond-mat/0512131 (unpublished).
541:
542: \bibitem{CWB}
543: A.A. Clerk, X. Waintal, and P.W. Brouwer,
544: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 4636 (2001).
545:
546: \bibitem{Mehta}
547: M.L. Mehta, {\it Random Matrices} (Academic Press, New York, 2004).
548:
549: \bibitem{VWZ}
550: J.J.M. Verbaarschot, H.A. Weidenm\"uller, and M.R. Zirnbauer,
551: Phys. Rep. {\bf 129}, 367 (1985).
552:
553: \bibitem{GIA-KK}
554: Y. Gefen, Y. Imry, and M.Ya. Azbel,
555: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 52}, 129 (1984);
556: B. Kubala and J. K\"onig,
557: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 245301 (2002);
558: {\bf 67}, 205303 (2003).
559:
560: \bibitem{Efetov} K.B. Efetov, Adv. Phys. {\bf 32}, 53 (1983);
561: {\it Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos}
562: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1997).
563:
564: \bibitem{randomS}
565: H.U. Baranger and P.A. Mello,
566: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 73}, 142 (1994);
567: R.A. Jalabert, J.-L. Pichard, and C.W.J. Beenakker,
568: Europhys. Lett. {\bf 27}, 255 (1994);
569: P.W. Brouwer and C.W.J. Beenakker,
570: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 50}, R11263 (1994).
571:
572: \bibitem{pker}
573: L.K. Hua, {\it Harmonic Analysis of Functions of Several Complex
574: Variables in the Classical Domains}
575: (AMS, Providence, RI, 1963);
576: P.A. Mello, P. Pereyra, and T.H. Seligman,
577: Ann. Phys. (NY) {\bf 161}, 254 (1985);
578: see also Ref.~\onlinecite{Beenakker}.
579:
580: \bibitem{Brouwer}
581: P.W. Brouwer, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 51}, 16878 (1995).
582:
583: \bibitem{Efetov2}
584: K.B. Efetov, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74}, 2299 (1995).
585:
586: \bibitem{BB}
587: P.W. Brouwer and C.W.J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, 4695 (1997).
588:
589: \end{thebibliography}
590:
591: \end{document}
592: