1: \nonstopmode

2: 

3: \newcommand{\ie}{i.e.{}}

4: \newcommand{\etal}{\textit{et al.}}

5: \newcommand{\U}[1]{\,{\rm{#1}}}

6: \newcommand{\I}[1]{_{\textrm{\scriptsize #1}}}

7: \newcommand{\Sum}{\sum\limits}

8: \newcommand{\angstrom}{\U{\hbox{\AA}}}

9: \newcommand{\degree}{{}^{\circ}}

10: \newcommand{\oHF}[1]{(HF)$_{#1}$}

11: \newcommand{\oHCl}[1]{(HCl)$_{#1}$}

12: \newcommand{\HF}{(HF)$_{\infty}$}

13: \newcommand{\HCl}{(HCl)$_{\infty}$}

14: \newcommand{\DCl}{(DCl)$_{\infty}$}

15: \newcommand{\Cal}[1]{{\cal #1}}

16: \newcommand{\mHartree}{\U{mE_{\mathit h}}}

17: \newcommand{\muHartree}{\U{\mu E_{\mathit h}}}

18: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left<\right.\!#1\!\left.\right|}

19: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|\right.\!#1\!\left.\right>}

20: \newcommand{\euler}{\textrm{e}}

21: 

22: 

23: \documentclass[prb,showpacs,nopreprintnumbers,twocolumn]{revtex4}

24: \usepackage{graphicx,dcolumn,subeqnarray}

25: 

26: \begin{document}

27: \title{Hydrogen bonding in infinite hydrogen fluoride

28: and hydrogen chloride chains}

29: \date{October 14, 2006}

30: \author{Christian Buth}

31: \email[Corresponding author. Electronic address: ]{Christian.Buth@web.de}

32: \author{Beate Paulus}

33: \affiliation{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik komplexer Systeme, N\"othnitzer

34: Stra\ss{}e~38, 01187~Dresden, Germany}

35: 

36: 

37: \begin{abstract}

38: Hydrogen bonding in infinite~\HF{} and \HCl{} bent (zigzag) chains

39: is studied using the \emph{ab initio}

40: coupled-cluster singles and doubles~(CCSD) correlation method.

41: The correlation contribution to the binding energy is

42: decomposed in terms of nonadditive many-body interactions between

43: the monomers in the chains, the so-called energy increments.

44: Van der Waals constants for the two-body dispersion interaction

45: between distant monomers in the infinite chains

46: are extracted from this decomposition.

47: They allow a partitioning of the correlation contribution to

48: the binding energy into short- and long-range terms.

49: This finding affords a significant reduction in the computational

50: effort of \emph{ab initio} calculations for solids as only

51: the short-range part requires a sophisticated treatment

52: whereas the long-range part can be summed immediately

53: to infinite distances.

54: \end{abstract}

55: 

56: 

57: %

58: % The 2006 PACS classification scheme

59: %

60: % 31.15.Ar Ab initio calculations

61: % 31.25.Qm Electron correlation calculations for polyatomic molecules

62: % 71.15.Nc Total energy and cohesive energy calculations

63: % 71.20.Ps Other inorganic compounds

64: %

65: 

66: \pacs{71.15.Nc, 71.20.Ps, 31.15.Ar, 31.25.Qm}

67: \preprint{arXiv:cond-mat/0601470}

68: \maketitle

69: 

70: 

71: \section{Introduction}

72: 

73: Hydrogen fluoride~\cite{Atoji:CS-54,Habuda:NM-71,Johnson:CS-75,%

74: Otto:BE-86,Panas:HF-93,Berski:DHF-98}

75: and hydrogen chloride~\cite{Sandor:CS-67,Sandor:CC-67,Sandor:ND-69}

76: are representatives of molecular crystals; the electronic structure

77: of the constituent HF or HCl~monomers is

78: essentially preserved upon crystallization.

79: The monomers in both crystals are hydrogen bonded;~\cite{Hamilton:HB-68,%

80: Pauling:NC-93,Scheiner:HB-97,Hadzi:TT-97,Karpfen:CE-02}

81: it is a directional and anisotropic bonding

82: of the hydrogen in a HF and HCl~monomer to the fluorine

83: or chlorine atom, respectively, of a neighboring monomer.

84: The bonding is caused by a partial withdrawal of charge from

85: the hydrogen atom due to the high electronegativity of

86: the fluorine or chlorine atoms.~\cite{Hamilton:HB-68,%

87: Pauling:NC-93,Scheiner:HB-97,Hadzi:TT-97,Karpfen:CE-02}

88: Hydrogen bonds are intermediates between ionic

89: bonding and van der Waals bonding and are of great

90: importance for the physical and chemical properties of many organic and

91: inorganic crystals. Moreover, they turn out to be crucial for the structure of

92: many biopolymers such as proteins and nucleic acids.~\cite{Hamilton:HB-68,%

93: Pauling:NC-93,Scheiner:HB-97,Hadzi:TT-97,Karpfen:CE-02}

94: 

95: At low temperature, HF and HCl crystals are structurally

96: very similar.

97: While HF forms strong hydrogen bonds, HCl forms

98: weak hydrogen bonds. Therefore, HF and HCl

99: represent good candidates for

100: a thorough analysis of this special type of bonding in crystals.

101: The monomers in both compounds are found to be arranged in terms of

102: parallel zigzag chains with a large interchain distance and, hence,

103: a weak interchain interaction [see Sec.~\ref{sec:comp} for details].

104: Frequently, a single infinite chain is considered as a simple but

105: realistic model of the crystals.

106: The isolated \HF{}~chain has fascinated many theoreticians

107: and much work has been carried out dealing with it;

108: namely, model studies,~\cite{Springborg:ES-87,Springborg:ES-88}

109: semiempirical~(intermediate neglect of differential overlap)

110: examinations of~\HF{} by Zunger,~\cite{Zunger:BS-75}

111: density functional theory calculations~[local density

112: approximation] of Springborg,~\cite{Springborg:ES-87,Springborg:ES-88}

113: and \emph{ab initio}

114: investigations.~\cite{Kertesz:AI-75,Karpfen:AI-76,%

115: Blumen:CC-76,Blumen:EB-77,Kertesz:AI-78,Karpfen:AI-80,Karpfen:HB-81,%

116: Karpfen:AI-82,Ihaya:AI-84,Liegener:AI-87,%

117: Mayer:CH-97,Berski:PHF-97,Hirata:AI-98,Jacquemin:LR-99,Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}

118: In contrast, the \HCl{} chain has not been investigated very extensively;

119: there are only a few \emph{ab initio} examinations.~\cite{Blumen:CC-76,Blumen:EB-77,Blumen:EBS-77,Berski:PHF-98}

120: For both isolated chains the zigzag geometry of Fig.~\ref{fig:polygeom}

121: is the energetically favored arrangement in comparison with

122: the linear geometry. For \HF{} chains this has been shown in

123: early studies of Karpfen~\etal~\cite{Karpfen:AI-76,Karpfen:AI-80} and

124: Beyer and Karpfen.~\cite{Karpfen:AI-82}

125: The structure of isolated~\HCl{} chains is investigated

126: in Ref.~\onlinecite{Berski:PHF-98}.

127: 

128: 

129: \begin{figure}

130:   \includegraphics[width=\hsize,clip]{HF_chain.eps}

131:   \caption{(Color online) Structure of infinite~\HF{} zigzag chains.

132:            The structure of \HCl{}~chains is analogous.

133:            The grey (red) numbers below the monomers indicate the relative

134:            position of a monomer in the chain with respect to the

135:            monomer~``0'' at the origin.}

136:   \label{fig:polygeom}

137: \end{figure}

138: 

139: 

140: The large number of \emph{ab initio} studies that have

141: been carried out for the chains also exhibits how

142: challenging hydrogen-bonded systems are.

143: An accurate treatment of hydrogen bonds requires both a

144: good electron correlation method and a large one-particle

145: basis set.~\cite{Halkier:BS-99,Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}

146: Hence, in Refs.~\onlinecite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}, we applied

147: basis set extrapolation schemes---which

148: are powerful methods to improve the accuracy

149: of both Hartree-Fock and correlation

150: energies for small molecules---to extended systems,

151: showing their validity and usefulness also in

152: this situation.

153: Thereby, a periodic Hartree-Fock treatment

154: was accompanied by correlation calculations.

155: 

156: We use the coupled-cluster singles and doubles~(CCSD) correlation

157: method~\cite{Purvis:CC-82} in conjunction with the

158: incremental scheme~\cite{Stoll:CD-92,%

159: Stoll:CS-92,Stoll:CG-92,Fulde:EC-95,Fulde:WF-02}

160: which has been used in many applications and yields

161: a physically meaningful many-body decomposition

162: of the correlation energy.

163: It has been applied to a few one-dimensional systems before: the

164: \textit{trans}-polyacetylene polymer,~\cite{Yu:IA-97}

165: the infinite lithium hydride chain,~\cite{Abdurahman:AI-00}

166: the beryllium hydride polymer,~\cite{Abdurahman:AI-00} and

167: poly(\textit{para}-phenylene).~\cite{Willnauer:QC-04}

168: In the context of the present paper, the contributions of

169: Doll~\etal,~\cite{Doll:CE-95,Doll:CE-96,Doll:CP-97,Doll:GS-98}

170: who studied ionic solids, as well as the investigations of

171: rare-gas crystals by Ro\'sciszewski~\etal~\cite{Rosciszewski:AI-99,%

172: Rosciszewski:AI-00} are worth mentioning because

173: hydrogen-bonded crystals fall in between these two

174: types of bonding.

175: 

176: This paper is structured as follows.

177: The CCSD electron correlation method and the incremental scheme

178: are introduced in Sec.~\ref{sec:theory} whereas Sec.~\ref{sec:comp}

179: describes geometries, basis sets, and the computer programs employed.

180: In Sec.~\ref{sec:elcorr}, we discuss electron

181: correlation effects and their implications.

182: The contributions to the binding energy of

183: the~\HF{} and \HCl{} chains are evaluated in

184: Sec.~\ref{sec:bind} and conclusions are drawn in

185: Sec.~\ref{sec:conclusion}.

186: 

187: 

188: \section{Theory}

189: \label{sec:theory}

190: 

191: We choose the Hartree-Fock approximation as a starting point to

192: study electron correlations, employing the full non-relativistic

193: Hamiltonian of the chains within the fixed-nuclei

194: approximation.~\cite{Szabo:MQC-89,Fulde:EC-95,Ladik:PS-99,%

195: Fulde:WF-02,Buth:MC-05}

196: The resulting Hartree-Fock Bloch orbitals are transformed

197: to Wannier orbitals because the latter provide a more

198: appropriate, local representation of the Hamiltonian for

199: a subsequent treatment of electron

200: correlations.~\cite{Fulde:EC-95,Fulde:WF-02,Forner:LC-92}

201: The ground-state wave function is modeled by the coupled-cluster

202: ansatz~\cite{Szabo:MQC-89}

203: %

204: \begin{equation}

205:   \ket{\Psi_0^N} = \euler^{\hat T} \ket{\Phi_0^N}

206: \end{equation}

207: %

208: which relates the $N$-electron Hartree-Fock ground-state wave

209: function~$\Phi_0^N$ to the correlated ground-state wave

210: function~$\Psi_0^N$ employing the cluster operator~$\hat T$.

211: For the calculations in this study,

212: it is sufficient to restrict $\hat T$~to single and double

213: excitations, resulting in the coupled-cluster singles and

214: doubles~(CCSD) scheme~\cite{Purvis:CC-82,Hirata:CC-03}

215: %

216: \begin{eqnarray}

217:   \hat T &=& \Sum_{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1 \atop \vec R_1 \, \kappa_1}

218:     t^{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1}_{\vec R_1 \, \kappa_1}

219:     \hat c^{\dagger}_{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1}

220:     \hat c_{\vec R_1 \, \kappa_1} \\

221: %

222:   &&{} + \Sum_{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1 < \vec R_2^{\prime} \, \alpha_2

223:     \atop \vec R_1 \, \kappa_1 < \vec R_2 \, \kappa_2}

224:     t^{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1, \vec R_2^{\prime} \, \alpha_2}_{\vec

225:        R_1 \, \kappa_1, \vec R_2 \, \kappa_2}

226:     \hat c^{\dagger}_{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1}

227:     \hat c^{\dagger}_{\vec R_2^{\prime} \, \alpha_2} \hat c_{\vec R_1 \, \kappa_1}

228:     \hat c_{\vec R_2 \, \kappa_2}

229:     \; . \nonumber

230: \end{eqnarray}

231: %

232: The coefficients~$t^{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1}_{\vec R_1 \, \kappa_1}$

233: and $t^{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1, \vec R_2^{\prime} \, \alpha_2}_{\vec

234: R_1 \, \kappa_1, \vec R_2 \, \kappa_2}$~are referred to as excitation

235: amplitudes.

236: Let~$\vec r$ and $s$ denote spatial and spin coordinates;

237: then $\hat c^{\dagger}_{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1}$ creates electrons

238: in virtual spin Wannier orbitals~$w_{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, \alpha_1}(\vec

239: r \, s)$ whereas $\hat c_{\vec R_1 \, \kappa_1}$ annihilates

240: electrons from occupied spin Wannier orbitals~$w_{\vec R_1 \,

241: \kappa_1}(\vec r \, s)$.

242: Here $\vec R_1$ and $\vec R_1^{\prime}$ denote the unit cell in

243: which the Wannier orbital is located and $\alpha_1$ and

244: $\kappa_1$ refer to Wannier orbital indices.

245: Assuming Born-von K\'arm\'an boundary conditions,

246: the correlation energy per unit

247: cell~$\Cal E_{\rm corr}$ is given by

248: %

249: \begin{equation}

250:   \label{eq:ccsdenergy}

251:   N_0 \, \Cal E_{\rm corr} = \bra{\Psi_0^N} \hat H \ket{\Psi_0^N}

252:     - \bra{\Phi_0^N} \hat H \ket{\Phi_0^N} \; ,

253: \end{equation}

254: %

255: where $N_0$~is the number of unit cells in the chains.

256: 

257: Occupied Wannier orbitals are grouped in terms of $n_{\rm one}$

258: pairwise disjunct one-body orbital sets which are defined

259: by

260: %

261: \begin{equation}

262:   \label{eq:onebset}

263:   \vec R \, I_l = \{w_{\vec R \, \alpha}(\vec r \, s) \> |

264:     \> \alpha \in I_l\}

265: \end{equation}

266: %

267: for~$l = 1, \ldots, n_{\rm one}$.

268: 

269: The expression for the correlation energy of a

270: crystal~(\ref{eq:ccsdenergy}) is rearranged and decomposed in terms

271: of correlation energies~$\varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots

272: \vec R_K \, I_K}$ of the electrons from

273: the one-body orbital sets~$\vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots \vec R_K \, I_K$.

274: The resulting formula for the correlation energy of the chains

275: per unit cell~$\Cal E_{\rm corr}$ reads~\cite{Stoll:CD-92,%

276: Stoll:CS-92,Stoll:CG-92,Fulde:EC-95,Yu:IA-97,Abdurahman:AI-00,%

277: Fulde:WF-02,Willnauer:QC-04,Buth:MC-05}

278: %

279: \begin{widetext}

280: \begin{equation}

281:   \label{eq:inccryst}

282:   \begin{array}{rcl}

283:     N_0 \, \Cal E_{\rm corr} &=& \frac{1}{1!} \, \Sum_{\vec R_1 \, I_1}

284:       \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1} + \frac{1}{2!} \, \Sum_{\vec R_1 \,

285:       I_1 \neq \vec R_2 \, I_2} \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \; \vec R_2

286:       \, I_2} \\

287:     &&{} + \cdots + \frac{1}{K!} \, \Sum_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots \vec R_K \, I_K

288:       \atop \textrm{\scriptsize pairwise disjunct}}

289:       \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots \vec R_K \, I_K}

290:       + \cdots \; . \nonumber \\

291: \end{array}

292: \end{equation}

293: %

294: The one-body~$\Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1}$, the

295: two-body~$\Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \; \vec R_2 \, I_2}$,

296: \dots, up to the $K$-body~$\Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots

297: \vec R_K \, I_K}$,~\ldots{} energy increments are defined recursively

298: by~\cite{Stoll:CD-92,Stoll:CS-92,Stoll:CG-92,Fulde:EC-95,Yu:IA-97,%

299: Abdurahman:AI-00,Fulde:WF-02,Willnauer:QC-04,Buth:MC-05}

300: %

301: \begin{subeqnarray}

302:   \label{eq:incdefs}

303:   \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1} &=& \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1} \; , \\

304: %

305:   \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \; \vec R_2 \, I_2} &=&

306:   \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \; \vec R_2 \, I_2} - \Delta

307:     \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1} - \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_2 \, I_2} \; , \\

308: %

309:   & \vdots & \nonumber \\

310: %

311:   \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots \vec R_K \, I_K} &=&

312:     \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots \vec R_K \, I_K}

313:     - \Sum_{n = 1}^{K - 1}

314:     \frac{1}{n!} \Sum_{{{

315:     \{ \vec R_1^{\prime} \, I_1^{\prime} \cdots \vec R_n^{\prime}

316:     \, I_n^{\prime} \}

317:     \atop \subset \{ \vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots \vec R_K \, I_K \} }

318:     \atop \vec R_1^{\prime} \, I_1^{\prime} \cdots \vec R_n^{\prime}

319:     \, I_n^{\prime} }

320:     \atop \textrm{\scriptsize pairwise disjunct}}

321:     \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1^{\prime} \, I_1^{\prime} \cdots \vec

322:     R_n^{\prime} \, I_n^{\prime}} \; . \\

323: %

324:   & \vdots & \nonumber

325: \end{subeqnarray}

326: \end{widetext}

327: %

328: The factors~$\frac{1}{1!}$, $\frac{1}{2!}$, \ldots, $\frac{1}{K!}$,

329: \ldots{} in front of the sums on the right-hand side of

330: Eq.~(\ref{eq:inccryst}) account for permutations among the one-body

331: orbital sets of a certain $K$-body energy increment~($K \geq 2$).

332: One can eliminate all permutations that lead to the

333: same energy increment by letting the sums in Eq.~(\ref{eq:inccryst})

334: run only over distinct sets of one-body orbital sets.

335: 

336: The translational relation of the Wannier orbitals

337: leads to the translational symmetry of the energy

338: increments, \ie, $\Delta \varepsilon_{\vec 0 \, I_1 \cdots \vec R_K

339: - \vec R_1 \, I_K} = \Delta \varepsilon_{\vec R_1 \, I_1 \cdots \vec R_K

340: \, I_K}$. This can be exploited in Eq.~(\ref{eq:inccryst})

341: to make the right-hand side of Eq.~(\ref{eq:inccryst})

342: independent of the first lattice sum~$\Sum_{\vec R_1}$ which, for this

343: reason, is $N_0$~times the sum of the translational

344: symmetry-adapted energy increments.

345: It allows us to eliminate the factor~$N_0$ in front of the

346: left-hand side of Eq.~(\ref{eq:inccryst})

347: and enormously reduces the number of energy increments

348: that need to be calculated to describe the chains with a

349: given accuracy.

350: 

351: The localized occupied molecular orbitals of oligomers, comprising a few

352: monomers arranged in the geometry of the infinite chains, are

353: found to be a good approximation to the Wannier orbitals of infinite

354: chains and crystals.~\cite{Stoll:CD-92,Stoll:CS-92,Stoll:CG-92,%

355: Fulde:EC-95,Yu:IA-97,Abdurahman:AI-00,Fulde:WF-02,Willnauer:QC-04}

356: This facilitates the determination of the correlation contribution

357: to the binding energy of infinite chains from

358: the energy increments in oligomers using Eq.~(\ref{eq:inccryst}).

359: Yet the virtual Wannier orbitals involved in the determination

360: of the energy increments, and implicitly contained in

361: Eq.~(\ref{eq:incdefs}), are replaced by all the virtual canonical

362: molecular orbitals of the oligomers.

363: The procedure outlined in this paragraph is termed the incremental

364: scheme.~\cite{Stoll:CD-92,Stoll:CS-92,Stoll:CG-92,%

365: Fulde:EC-95,Fulde:WF-02}

366: 

367: 

368: \section{Computational details}

369: \label{sec:comp}

370: 

371: Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride crystallize in an orthorhombic

372: low-temperature phase described by the space groups~$Bm2_1b$ for

373: HF,~\cite{Atoji:CS-54,Habuda:NM-71,Johnson:CS-75} and

374: $Bb2_1m$ for HCl.~\cite{Sandor:CS-67,Sandor:CC-67,Sandor:ND-69}

375: The unit cells of both crystals contain four monomers which

376: are arranged in terms of weakly interacting parallel zigzag

377: chains~[Fig.~\ref{fig:polygeom}].

378: The chains are described by a unit cell which comprises two monomers

379: and are considered as an excellent one-dimensional model for

380: HF and HCl crystals.~\cite{Zunger:BS-75,%

381: Kertesz:AI-75,Karpfen:AI-76,Blumen:CC-76,%

382: Blumen:EB-77,Blumen:EBS-77,Kertesz:AI-78,%

383: Karpfen:AI-80,Karpfen:HB-81,Karpfen:AI-82,%

384: Ihaya:AI-84,Liegener:AI-87,%

385: Springborg:ES-87,Springborg:ES-88,Mayer:CH-97,%

386: Berski:PHF-97,Berski:PHF-98,Hirata:AI-98,%

387: Jacquemin:LR-99,Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}

388: The structure of a single chain is determined by

389: three parameters, the H---$X$~distance~$r$,

390: the $X \cdots X$~distance~$R$, and the

391: angle~$\alpha = \angle({\rm H}X{\rm H})$, $X ={}$F$,$Cl.

392: Experimental values for the parameters are~$r = 0.92 \angstrom$,

393: $R = 2.50 \angstrom$, and $\alpha = 120 \degree$ for

394: \HF{},~\cite{Atoji:CS-54,Holleman:IC-01} and

395: $r = 1.25 \angstrom$, $R = 3.688 \angstrom$, and

396: $\alpha = 93.3 \degree$ for

397: \DCl{}.~\cite{Sandor:CS-67} HCl and deuterated DCl crystals

398: have very similar lattice

399: constants and are considered to be isomorphous.~\cite{Sandor:CS-67}

400: Unfortunately, further structural information for HCl crystals

401: is unavailable.

402: 

403: To calculate the energy increments in Eq.~(\ref{eq:inccryst}), we

404: perform molecular calculations on oligomers~\oHF{n} and

405: \oHCl{n}, respectively, \ie, short fragments of the chains.

406: We utilize the program package \textsc{molpro},~\cite{MOLPRO2002.6}

407: employing Foster-Boys localization~\cite{Boys:MO-60,Foster:MO-60}

408: of the molecular orbitals and the

409: coupled-cluster singles and doubles~(CCSD) correlation

410: method.~\cite{Purvis:CC-82,Hampel:CE-92,MOLPRO2002.6}

411: Thereby, we are consistent with Refs.~\onlinecite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}

412: where also the CCSD~method was employed.

413: We use the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set~\cite{Dunning:GBS-89,%

414: Kendall:EA-92,Woon:GBS-93,basislib-04} which

415: yields somewhat less accurate total

416: binding energies than those obtained in

417: Refs.~\onlinecite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}.

418: Yet we are mainly interested in the long-range behavior of

419: electron correlations in the hydrogen-bonded chains;

420: it is well described by the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set due

421: to vanishingly small geometrical orbital

422: overlaps among the one-body orbital sets

423: in the $K$-body energy increments considered.

424: In fact, the modulus of the two-body energy increment

425: involving the third-nearest-neighbor monomer~$|\varepsilon_{03}|$,

426: as obtained with the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set,~\cite{Dunning:GBS-89,%

427: Kendall:EA-92,Woon:GBS-93,basislib-04} is smaller

428: %

429: % HF: EINC47 aug-cc-pVDZ - aug-cc-pVTZ

430: % (-0.00000737 - (-0.00000752)) / 0.00000737 = 2.0%

431: %

432: by~$2 \%$ for~\HF{} and

433: %

434: % HCl: EINC36 aug-cc-pVDZ - aug-cc-pVTZ

435: % (-0.00001059 - (-0.00001106)) / -0.00001059 = 4.4%

436: %

437: by~$4 \%$ for~\HCl{} than~$|\varepsilon_{03}|$

438: obtained with the larger aug-cc-pVTZ basis set~\cite{Dunning:GBS-89,%

439: Kendall:EA-92,Woon:GBS-93,basislib-04}

440: [Sec.~\ref{sec:elcorr}].

441: Similarly, $K$-body energy increments for $K \geq 3$ agree

442: well as soon as the geometrical orbital overlaps between the

443: one-body orbital sets become negligible.

444: 

445: In Tab.~\ref{tab:bindtotal} below, reference is made to periodic

446: Hartree-Fock calculations of~\HF{} and \HCl{}

447: chains, described in Refs.~\onlinecite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05},

448: which were carried out with the \textsc{crystal}

449: program.~\cite{Pisani:HF-88,Pisani:QM-96,crystal03}

450: For these calculations, the $f, g, h, i$ functions

451: were removed from the basis sets.

452: To estimate the influence of the neglected basis functions on the

453: total binding energy of the chains, we use

454: \textsc{molpro},~\cite{MOLPRO2002.6} to calculate the Hartree-Fock

455: binding energy per monomer for~\oHF{9} and \oHCl{9}

456: both with and without $f, g, h$~functions using the

457: cc-pV5Z basis set;~\cite{Dunning:GBS-89,Woon:GBS-93,basislib-04}

458: at the Hartree-Fock level it is close to completeness with

459: respect to basis functions with the angular momenta~$s, p, d$.

460: The binding energies of both chains

461: obtained with $f, g, h$~functions are smaller

462: %

463: % Estimate Hartree-Fock binding in (HF)_9 energy of cc-pV5Z minus

464: %       cc-pV5Z-without-f,g,h-functions

465: %

466: % HF

467: % cc-pV5Z        : -900.70115997 / 9 - (-100.07035200) = -0.00755466

468: % cc-pV5Z-crystal: -900.69710425 / 9 - (-100.06988760) = -0.00756843

469: % cc-pV5Z minus cc-pV5Z-crystal = -0.00755466 - (-0.00756843) = 0.00001377

470: %

471: %

472: % HCl

473: % cc-pV5Z        : -4141.01380657 / 9 - (-460.11238499) = -0.0002602

474: % cc-pV5Z-crystal: -4141.00858712 / 9 - (-460.11179208) = -0.0002732

475: % cc-pV5Z minus cc-pV5Z-crystal = -0.00026020 - (-0.00027320) = 0.00001300

476: %

477: by~$\approx 13 \U{\mu E_h}$ than those determined without them.

478: This deviation turns out to be sufficiently small to be neglected

479: in the subsequent calculation of total binding energies

480: in Sec.~\ref{sec:bind}.

481: However, note that for the correlation calculations

482: the $f, g, h$~functions are fully considered.

483: 

484: The calculated binding energies reported here

485: account for the basis set superposition

486: error~\cite{Duijneveldt:CP-94}~(BSSE)

487: by the counterpoise correction~(CP);

488: it is determined by surrounding an isolated HF or HCl

489: monomer by sufficiently many ghost atoms positioned in

490: the geometry of the infinite

491: chains.~\cite{Boys:CP-70,Duijneveldt:CP-94}

492: 

493: 

494: \section{Electron correlations}

495: \label{sec:elcorr}

496: \subsection{Transferability}

497: \label{sec:transfer}

498: 

499: We have to ensure that the Foster-Boys-localized

500: molecular orbitals~\cite{Boys:MO-60,Foster:MO-60}

501: which are extracted from oligomers

502: are a good approximation to the Wannier orbitals of the

503: infinite \HF{} and \HCl{}~chains.

504: They have to be approximately translationally

505: related within a certain oligomer and

506: must not differ substantially

507: among oligomers of varying length.

508: These two properties of the localized

509: occupied molecular orbitals are termed transferability.

510: In order to achieve transferability for

511: moderately sized molecular clusters, one is

512: frequently obliged to account for the omitted

513: monomers in terms of an appropriate substitute.

514: In the case of~\HF{} and \HCl{}, two options

515: offer themselves. On the one hand, both

516: chains are cut out from a molecular crystal, implying

517: no substitutes as in rare-gas

518: crystals;~\cite{Rosciszewski:AI-99,Rosciszewski:AI-00}

519: on the other hand, particularly~\HF{} is rather

520: ionic and a surrounding by point charges

521: can be envisaged to create the embedding

522: which adequately models the infinite

523: chains.~\cite{Evjen:OS-32,Doll:CE-95,%

524: Doll:CE-96,Doll:CP-97,Doll:GS-98}

525: I explore both possibilities to elucidate what kind of procedure is

526: adequate for hydrogen-bonded solids.

527: The virtual orbitals of the oligomers are not altered

528: and remain canonical molecular orbitals

529: in the calculation of the individual energy increments.

530: The oligomer approximation thus corresponds

531: to a sort of domain decomposition of the

532: virtual space which also is applied in other

533: local correlation methods.~\cite{Pisani:LT-03}

534: 

535: 

536: \begin{figure}

537:   \includegraphics[width=\hsize,clip]{conv_one-body.eps}

538:    \caption{(Color online) One-body energy increments~$\Delta\varepsilon_0$

539:             of~\HF{} and \HCl{} chains as determined in oligomers of varying

540:             length reduced by the CP-corrected correlation energy~$\Cal

541:             E\I{mon}^{\rm corr}$ of the corresponding isolated monomer.

542:             The mean value of the two innermost energy increments

543:             of the oligomers is taken.

544:             Circles stand for~\HF{} and squares

545:             for~\HCl{} data. Open symbols refer to

546:             oligomers surrounded by point charges

547:             whereas closed symbols denote isolated

548:             oligomers.}

549:   \label{fig:one-body}

550: \end{figure}

551: 

552: 

553: \begin{figure}

554:   \includegraphics[width=\hsize,clip]{conv_two-body.eps}

555:    \caption{(Color online) Two-body energy increments~$\Delta\varepsilon_{01}$

556:             of~\HF{} and \HCl{} chains as determined in oligomers of varying length.

557:             The two innermost one-body orbital sets of the respective

558:             oligomer are taken to determine~$\Delta\varepsilon_{01}$.

559:             Symbols are chosen as in Fig.~\ref{fig:one-body}.}

560:   \label{fig:two-body}

561: \end{figure}

562: 

563: 

564: In the case of~\HF{} and \HCl{}, the outer and inner valence

565: orbitals, \ie, eight electrons, are assigned to the one-body

566: orbital set representing a particular HF or HCl~monomer~(\ref{eq:onebset}).

567: To test the transferability, we

568: calculate all one-body energy increments

569: and all two-body energy increments between

570: two adjacent monomers, the so-called

571: connected two-body energy increments,

572: in isolated oligomers~\oHF{n} and

573: \oHCl{n} for $n = 2, 4, 6, 10$.

574: They are compared with the energy increments from the

575: oligomers which were surrounded by point charges

576: up to twentieth-nearest neighbors.

577: The hydrogen atoms are represented by~$q = +1$;

578: fluorine and chlorine atoms are described

579: by~$q = -1$ with the exception of the terminal charges

580: which are set to~$q = -\frac{1}{2}$.~\cite{Evjen:OS-32,%

581: Doll:CE-95,Doll:CE-96,Doll:CP-97,Doll:GS-98}

582: 

583: Comparing the one-body and the connected two-body energy

584: increments obtained in oligomers of varying length in

585: Figs.~\ref{fig:one-body} and \ref{fig:two-body}, we

586: observe a rapid convergence of their values toward the

587: limit of the infinite chains

588: where the values determined for the isolated

589: oligomers and the values resulting from

590: the point-charge-embedded oligomers

591: approach each other quickly.

592: The energy increments taken from the isolated oligomers

593: increase (decrease) in Fig.~\ref{fig:one-body}~(Fig.~\ref{fig:two-body})

594: monotonically with the oligomer length

595: whereas the embedding with point charges causes an unsystematic

596: but quicker convergence.

597: The convergence behavior of the individual curves

598: in Figs.~\ref{fig:one-body} and \ref{fig:two-body}

599: is governed by a small variation in the localized orbitals

600: and, predominantly, by the improvement of the electronic

601: structure which approaches rapidly

602: the electronic structure of the infinite chains with

603: increasing length of the oligomers.

604: Obviously, the decision whether to employ point

605: charges or not has only a small impact on the values of the

606: energy increments.

607: The one-body (two-body) energy increments differ by

608: %

609: % CCSD, aug-cc-pVDZ, (HF)_10

610: % EINC4 - EINC4pointcharges

611: % -0.22338000 - (-0.22331345) = -0.00006655 Eh = -67 muEh

612: %

613: $67 \muHartree$

614: %

615: % CCSD, aug-cc-pVDZ, (HF)_10

616: % EINC45 - EINC45pointcharges

617: % -0.00408785 - (-0.00410198) =  0.00001413 Eh =  14 muEh

618: %

619: ($14 \muHartree$) in~\HF{} and by

620: %

621: % CCSD, aug-cc-pVDZ, (HCl)_10

622: % EINC4 - EINC4pointcharges

623: % -0.175099 - (-0.17507709) = -0.00002191 Eh = -21.91 muEh

624: %

625: $22 \muHartree$

626: %

627: % CCSD, aug-cc-pVDZ, (HCl)_10

628: % EINC45 - EINC45pointcharges

629: % -0.00282125 - (-0.00285217) = 0.00003092 Eh = 30.92 muEh

630: %

631: ($31 \muHartree$) in~\HCl{}.

632: In what follows only energy increments taken from

633: isolated oligomers are considered, as in

634: Refs.~\onlinecite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}.

635: 

636: The error on the binding

637: energy due to the approximate translational

638: relation of the Wannier orbitals

639: taken from the finite-length oligomers can be estimated

640: by investigating the numerical

641: differences between energy increments whose values should

642: be identical due to (translational) symmetry. The

643: connected two-body increments, for example,

644: vary at most by~$40 \U{\mu E_h}$ in~\oHF{10} and at most

645: by~$11 \U{\mu E_h}$ in~\oHCl{10}.%

646: %

647: ~\footnote{The two first and the two last monomers at the

648: ends of the oligomers are not regarded as they are

649: appreciably influenced by finite-size effects.}

650: %

651: We conclude that the transferability prerequisite

652: of the energy increments is satisfied within good accuracy.

653: The agreement between the results obtained in the two

654: different ways described before corroborates

655: the applicability of oligomers to represent the

656: electronic structure of infinite~\HF{}

657: and \HCl{} chains.

658: 

659: 

660: \begin{table}

661:   \centering

662:   \begin{ruledtabular}

663:     \begin{tabular}{ldd}

664:       Increment     & $\HF$ & $\HCl$ \\

665:       \hline

666:       \quad $\Delta\varepsilon_{0}$          & -223.3632 & -175.0985 \\

667:       \quad $\Delta\varepsilon_{0\,1}$       &   -4.0879 &   -2.8213 \\

668:       \quad $\Delta\varepsilon_{0\,2}$       &   -0.0861 &   -0.1347 \\

669:       \quad $\Delta\varepsilon_{0\,1\,2}$    &   -0.0163 &    0.0014 \\

670:       \quad $\Delta\varepsilon_{0\,3}$       &   -0.0063 &   -0.0092 \\

671:       \quad $\Delta\varepsilon_{0\,1\,3}$    &   -0.0015 &   -0.0016 \\

672:       \quad $\Delta\varepsilon_{0\,1\,2\,3}$ &    0.0003 &    0.0006 \\

673:     \end{tabular}

674:   \end{ruledtabular}

675:   \caption{Exemplary energy increments of~\HF{} and \HCl{} chains

676:            taken from~\oHF{10} and \oHCl{10} oligomers.

677:            The energy increments are computed using the one-body

678:            orbital sets of the innermost monomers in the oligomers.

679:            All data are given in millihartrees.}

680:   \label{tab:increments}

681: \end{table}

682: 

683: 

684: \subsection{Short-range correlations}

685: \label{sec:increments}

686: 

687: Let us discuss the short-range correlation contributions first.

688: The most relevant energy increments of~\HF{}

689: and \HCl{} are summarized in Tab.~\ref{tab:increments}.

690: The CP-corrected correlation energy of the

691: %

692: % aug-cc-pVDZ, CP in (HF)_9

693: % -100.261311923055 - (-100.033971301475) = -0.227340621580

694: %

695: HF monomer, $-227.3406 \mHartree$,

696: %

697: % aug-cc-pVDZ, CP in (HCl)_9

698: % -460.268686021020 - (-460.092470961000) = -0.176215060020

699: %

700: and of the HCl monomer, $-176.2151 \mHartree$, are

701: %

702: % aug-cc-pVDZ, HF

703: % (-0.227340621580 - (-0.223363216268)) / (-0.223363216268)

704: %       = 0.01780689487935986815

705: %

706: only larger in magnitude by~$1.8 \%$

707: %

708: % aug-cc-pVDZ, HCl

709: % (-0.176215060020 - (-0.175098524764)) / (-0.175098524764)

710: %       = -0.00637661

711: %

712: and $0.6 \%$, respectively, than the

713: corresponding one-body energy

714: increments~$\Delta\varepsilon_0$.

715: They are a bit larger because the electrons of a monomer

716: in the chains experience Pauli repulsion exerted by the

717: neighboring monomers.

718: However, these effects are small in our case and the electronic

719: structure of the~HF and HCl monomers is essentially

720: preserved in the \HF{} and \HCl{}~chains.

721: 

722: The $K$-body energy increments, $K \geq 2$, describe the mutual

723: correlation of the valence electrons of several monomers.

724: They give rise to a pronounced nonlinear increase of the binding energy

725: of small clusters and short oligomers which is termed bond

726: cooperativity (Ref.~\onlinecite{Karpfen:CE-02}

727: and references therein).

728: The modulus of the connected two-body energy increment

729: of~\HCl{}, $|\Delta\varepsilon_{01}^{\rm HCl}|$,

730: %

731: % aug-cc-pVDZ

732: % (-4.0879 - (-2.8213)) / (-4.0879) = 0.309841

733: %

734: is~$31 \%$ smaller than the modulus of the corresponding

735: energy increment of~\HF{}, $|\Delta\varepsilon_{01}^{\rm HF}|$.

736: The connected three-body energy

737: increment~$\Delta\varepsilon_{012}^{\rm HCl}$

738: is repulsive, \ie, greater than zero, but~$\Delta\varepsilon_{012}^{\rm HF}$

739: is again attractive, \ie, smaller than zero.

740: The reverse trend is observed for the remaining energy increments.

741: The modulus of the energy increment~$\Delta\varepsilon_{02}^{\rm HCl}$

742: %

743: % aug-cc-pVDZ

744: % (-0.0861 - (-0.1347)) / (-0.0861) = -0.56446

745: %

746: is~$57 \%$ larger than~$|\Delta\varepsilon_{02}^{\rm HF}|$.

747: The connected four-body increment~$\Delta\varepsilon_{0123}^{\rm HCl}$

748: %

749: % aug-cc-pVDZ

750: % (0.0006 - (0.0003)) / (0.0003) = 1.0

751: %

752: is~$100 \%$ larger than~$\Delta\varepsilon_{0123}^{\rm HF}$ and both

753: are repulsive.

754: These two trends of the energy increments can be explained

755: by two effects.

756: First, short-range correlation is effective for nearest

757: neighbors [see also the ensuing Sec.~\ref{sec:long}];

758: it is apparently stronger in~\HF{} than in \HCl{} due to

759: the tighter packing of the monomers in~\HF{}

760: and the higher compactness of the HF~monomer itself.

761: Second, chlorine atoms have a higher polarizability than

762: fluorine atoms because their valence electrons

763: are more diffuse than those of the latter atom.

764: This causes the van der Waals interaction

765: to be stronger in~\HCl{} than in~\HF{},~\cite{Craig:MQ-84}

766: leading to the more distant energy increments being larger in~\HCl{}

767: when compared with~\HF{};

768: all this despite the larger intermonomer distances

769: in~\HCl{} than in~\HF{}.

770: 

771: However, note that one should not associate too much physics with the

772: particular values of energy increments;

773: namely, they depend on the specific unitary transformation

774: used to localize the occupied orbitals

775: (here the one of Foster and Boys~\cite{Boys:MO-60,Foster:MO-60}).

776: Only the binding energy, which involves the sum of all the energy

777: increments [Eqs.~(\ref{eq:RHF_bind}) and (\ref{eq:corrpoly})],

778: is a physical observable and thus invariant under

779: orbital transformations.

780: When an analysis of the individual energy increments

781: is to be meaningful, their value should be

782: fairly independent of the localization procedure

783: which is well satisfied in our case.

784: 

785: 

786: \begin{table}

787:   \centering

788:   \begin{ruledtabular}

789:     \begin{tabular}{rddd}

790:       Compound & C_6^{\rm odd} & C_6^{\rm even} & $Experiment$%

791: %

792: \footnote{The experimental data are taken from Ref.~\onlinecite{Kumar:PS-85};

793: it is a rotational average of the van der Waals constants for the

794: dispersion interaction between two isolated monomers.} \\

795: %

796:       \hline

797:       % Cardinal number fit

798:       \HF      & 23.4         & 20.2          & 19.00     \\

799:       % Cardinal number fit

800:       \HCl     & 121          & 120           & 130.4     \\

801:     \end{tabular}

802:   \end{ruledtabular}

803:   \caption{Van der Waals constants $C_6^{\rm odd}$

804:            and $C_6^{\rm even}$ of the two-body dispersion interaction

805:            for the~\HF{} and \HCl{} chains. They are obtained by fitting

806:            the two-body energy increments of Fig.~\ref{fig:two-body-short}

807:            with either odd or even cardinal numbers~$n$, respectively,

808:            to Eq.~(\ref{eq:vdwdisp}).

809:            All data are given in~hartree~bohr$^6$.}

810:   \label{tab:van-der-Waals}

811: \end{table}

812: 

813: 

814: \subsection{Long-range correlations}

815: \label{sec:long}

816: 

817: At a separation of two isolated monomers where the geometrical

818: overlap between the orbitals from distinct one-body orbital sets of the

819: monomers becomes negligible, only van der Waals dispersion

820: interactions remain.

821: This is also the case for the interaction between two

822: monomers in the infinite chains which is

823: correspondingly described by the two-body energy increments.

824: Their absolute values in~\HF{} and \HCl{}

825: for two monomers at a distance up to

826: seventh nearest neighbors are displayed in

827: Fig.~\ref{fig:two-body-short};

828: the curves drop off rapidly with distance.

829: 

830: The monomers in Fig.~\ref{fig:polygeom} that are labeled by

831: odd cardinal numbers are tilted with respect

832: to monomer~$0$. Likewise, monomers with even cardinal

833: numbers are arranged parallel to the monomer~$0$.

834: We will refer to the two types of two-body energy increments

835: that result from a parallel or tilted setting of monomers

836: as even or odd energy increments,

837: respectively.

838: The long-range interaction between two monomers

839: is approximated by the leading term of the two-body

840: van der Waals dispersion interaction~\cite{Klein:RG-76,Craig:MQ-84}

841: %

842: \begin{equation}

843:   \label{eq:vdwdisp}

844:   \varepsilon_{0 \, n}^{\textrm{\scriptsize vdW}} = \cases{

845:     \textstyle - \frac{C_6^{\rm odd }}{(\frac{n}{2} \, a)^6} \; , & $n$~odd       \cr

846:     \textstyle - \frac{C_6^{\rm even}}{(\frac{n}{2} \, a)^6} \; , & $n$~even$\;,$ \cr }

847: \end{equation}

848: %

849: where individual van der Waals constants~$C_6^{\rm odd}$ and

850: $C_6^{\rm even}$, respectively, are affixed for odd and even

851: energy increments.

852: Here $a$~represents the lattice constant of the chains.

853: %

854: % xmgrace 5.1.14 uses the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm

855: % for non-linear curve fitting which is based on

856: % LMDIF from MINPACK, with some modifications.

857: %

858: % Literature (LMDIF):

859: % K. Levenberg (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems

860: % in least squares.  Quart. Appl. Math. 2:164-168.

861: %

862: % D.W. Marquardt (1963) An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear

863: % parameters.  J. Soc. Industr. Appl. Math. 11:431-441  (also: SIAM J. Appl. Math.).

864: %

865: % Jorge J. More, The Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm: Implementation

866: % and Theory. Numerical Analysis, G. A. Watson, editor.

867: % Lecture Notes in Mathematics 630, Springer-Verlag, 1977.

868: %

869: The van der Waals constants are obtained by a weighted

870: nonlinear curve fit~\cite{More:LM-78}

871: of the data in Fig.~\ref{fig:two-body-short} for either the odd

872: or the even energy increments.

873: The weights are chosen such that the fit reproduces the energy

874: increments with large~$n$ best, as for them the geometrical

875: orbital overlaps between the orbitals from two different

876: one-body orbital sets are negligible.

877: The van der Waals constants for the fits of the two sets

878: of translationally equivalent monomers are given in

879: Tab.~\ref{tab:van-der-Waals}.

880: Our theoretical data compare satisfactorily with the

881: experimental data for the dispersion interaction between

882: two isolated monomers also given in the table.

883: 

884: Having identified the van der Waals contribution to the

885: two-body energy increments in the chains, we can

886: subtract it

887: from the two-body energy increments to obtain

888: van der Waals-reduced energy increments

889: %

890: \begin{equation}

891:   \label{eq:vdw-reduced}

892:   \Delta \varepsilon^{\textrm{\scriptsize vdW}}_{0 n}

893:     = \Delta \varepsilon_{0 n} - \varepsilon_{0 n}^{

894:     \textrm{\scriptsize vdW}} \; .

895: \end{equation}

896: %

897: Their absolute value~$|\Delta \varepsilon_{0 n}^{

898: \textrm{\scriptsize vdW}}|$ is shown next to the absolute value of

899: the two-body energy increments~$|\Delta \varepsilon_{0 n}|$ in

900: Fig.~\ref{fig:two-body-short}.

901: 

902: Two regions can be identified in Fig.~\ref{fig:two-body-short}.

903: First, from the nearest to the third-nearest neighbors, there

904: is the local correlation zone, where, due to geometrical orbital

905: overlaps, short-range electron correlations are effective.

906: There, the decay of two-body energy increments

907: with the distance between the two monomers

908: is faster than the one that would result from a pure van

909: der Waals interaction, following Eq.~(\ref{eq:vdwdisp}).

910: We observe that the van der Waals contribution to~$|\Delta \varepsilon^{

911: \textrm{\scriptsize vdW}}_{0 1}|$ of~\HCl{} is appreciably

912: larger than in~\HF{} as the curves for~$|\Delta \varepsilon_{0 1}|$

913: and $|\Delta \varepsilon^{\textrm{\scriptsize vdW}}_{0 1}|$ are

914: much closer for~\HCl{} than for~\HF{}.

915: Second, there is the van der Waals zone reaching from the

916: third- up to the seventh-nearest neighbor.

917: Here a typical $r^{-6}$~decay is observed, leading to van

918: der Waals-reduced energy increments that are essentially zero.

919: A slight deviation of the two-body energy increments

920: from an $r^{-6}$~behavior is perceived beyond

921: fifth-nearest neighbors which likely can be

922: attributed to inaccuracies caused by the oligomer

923: approximation.

924: The translational relation of the Wannier orbitals is better

925: satisfied in~\HCl{} compared with~\HF{} [Sec.~\ref{sec:transfer}]

926: which leads to a lower absolute value of the fourth to seventh

927: van der Waals-reduced energy increments.

928: The low absolute value of~$\Delta \varepsilon^{\textrm{\scriptsize

929: vdW}}_{0 6}$ for both chains is an artifact of the fitting

930: process.

931: Figure~\ref{fig:two-body-short} also reveals that the two-body

932: energy increments

933: are of satisfactory accuracy even beyond the estimates

934: given in~Sec.~\ref{sec:transfer} of~$40 \U{\mu E_h}$ for~\oHF{10}

935: and $11 \U{\mu E_h}$ for~\oHCl{10}

936: due to a considerable error cancellation.

937: 

938: 

939: \begin{figure}

940:   \includegraphics[width=\hsize,clip]{decay_two-body.eps}

941:   \caption{(Color online) Absolute values of two-body energy

942:            increments~$|\Delta \varepsilon_{0 \, n}|$ (closed symbols)

943:            and van der Waals-reduced two-body energy

944:            increments~$|\Delta \varepsilon_{0 \, n}^{\textrm{\scriptsize

945:            vdW}}|$ (open symbols)

946:            using Eq.~(\ref{eq:vdwdisp}) and the

947:            constants in Tab.~\ref{tab:van-der-Waals} for

948:            both the \HF{} chain (circles) and the \HCl{} chain (squares).}

949:   \label{fig:two-body-short}

950: \end{figure}

951: 

952: 

953: Given the van der Waals constants in Tab.~\ref{tab:van-der-Waals}, we

954: can use Eq.~(\ref{eq:vdwdisp}) to sum up the van der Waals

955: contribution of the two-body energy increments to the binding energy

956: to infinite distance~$\Sum_{n=3}^{\infty} \varepsilon_{0 n}^{

957: \textrm{\scriptsize vdW}}$ which yields

958: $-8 \U{\mu E_h}$~for~\HF{} and $-12 \U{\mu E_h}$~for~\HCl{}.

959: The bigger polarizability of chlorine atoms compared with

960: fluorine atoms leads to the larger contribution

961: in~\HCl{} when compared with~\HF{} as can be expected from the

962: analysis of the energy increments in Sec.~\ref{sec:increments}.

963: The contribution of two-body energy increments beyond

964: %

965: % HF: Amount of third-neighrest neighbor increment

966: % (-0.008 - (-0.0063)) / (-0.0063) = 0.2698

967: %

968: %

969: % HCl: Amount of third-neighrest neighbor increment

970: % (-0.012 - (-0.0092)) / (-0.0092) = 0.3044

971: %

972: third-nearest neighbors is in both cases~$\approx 30 \%$

973: of~$\Delta \varepsilon_{0 \, 3}$.

974: 

975: Generally, once a good estimate of the van der Waals constants of a crystal is

976: available, the decomposition of the energy increments

977: into a short- and a long-range van der Waals

978: contribution can be made. This allows one to

979: focus on the short-range part.

980: Thereby, the required number of energy increments

981: to be calculated to reach a certain accuracy of the correlation

982: energy is reduced considerably.

983: Therefore, the computational demand of its determination is

984: also significantly decreased.

985: 

986: 

987: \section{Binding energy}

988: \label{sec:bind}

989: 

990: Having understood the impact of electron correlations

991: in~\HF{} and \HCl{} chains, we are now in a position to examine

992: the total binding energy per monomer~$\Delta E$ of the chains;

993: it is given by

994: %

995: \begin{equation}

996:   \label{eq:RHF_bind}

997:   \begin{array}{rcl}

998:     \Delta E &=& \Delta E_{\rm SCF} + \Delta E_{\rm corr} \\

999:              &=& \frac{1}{2} \, (\Cal E^{\rm SCF}_{\rm chain}

1000:                  + \Cal E^{\rm corr}_{\rm chain})

1001:                  - \Cal E^{\rm SCF}_{\rm monomer}

1002:                  - \Cal E^{\rm corr}_{\rm monomer} \; .

1003:   \end{array}

1004: \end{equation}

1005: %

1006: It consists of the Hartree-Fock and the correlation

1007: contributions~$\Delta E_{\rm SCF}$ and $\Delta

1008: E_{\rm corr}$, respectively, where $\Cal E^{\rm

1009: SCF}_{\rm chain}$ and $\Cal E^{\rm corr}_{\rm chain}$

1010: denote the Hartree-Fock and correlation energies per

1011: unit cell of the chains.

1012: Furthermore, $\Cal E^{\rm SCF}_{\rm monomer}$

1013: and $\Cal E^{\rm corr}_{\rm monomer}$ are the corresponding

1014: energies for the monomers.

1015: The Hartree-Fock energies are readily available from molecular and

1016: periodic calculations~\cite{Pisani:HF-88,Pisani:QM-96,crystal03}

1017: but electron correlations are more involved and were discussed

1018: in the previous Sec.~\ref{sec:elcorr}.

1019: 

1020: In Tab.~\ref{tab:bindtotal}, we communicate basis-set-extrapolated

1021: Hartree-Fock binding energies~$\Delta E_{\rm SCF}(\infty)$ for the

1022: chains taken from Refs.~\onlinecite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}.

1023: At the Hartree-Fock equilibrium geometry of~\HF{},

1024: Bayer and Karpfen give~$-10.360 \mHartree$ for basis set~3 in

1025: Ref.~\onlinecite{Karpfen:AI-82} while Hirata and Iwata

1026: find~$-10.855 \mHartree$ for the 6-311++G(d,p) basis

1027: set.~\cite{Hirata:AI-98}

1028: Both numbers are in good agreement with our result which

1029: is~$-10.202 \mHartree$.

1030: Yet Berski and Latajka report~$-9.696 \mHartree$ for~\HF{},

1031: when using the 6-311G(d,p) basis set,~\cite{Berski:PHF-97} and

1032: $-2.073 \mHartree$ for~\HCl{} harnessing the DZ(d,p)

1033: basis set.~\cite{Berski:PHF-98}

1034: The latter number in particular deviates considerably from our

1035: result, $-0.586 \mHartree$,

1036: which is most likely due to the fact that

1037: they did not remove the BSSE.~\cite{Berski:PHF-97,Berski:PHF-98}

1038: 

1039: To determine the correlation energy per monomer of the

1040: infinite chains~$\Cal E_{\rm corr}$, we inspect

1041: the energy increments in Tab.~\ref{tab:increments}.

1042: They converge rapidly both with increasing distance among the

1043: monomers involved and with increasing order of the many-body

1044: expansion, \ie, with the maximum number of monomers correlated

1045: in a specific energy increment.

1046: In order to obtain an accuracy in~$\Cal E_{\rm corr}$

1047: of $\approx 50 \U{\mu E_h}$ for~\HF{} and

1048: of $\approx 11 \U{\mu E_h}$ for~\HCl{},

1049: we see from Tab.~\ref{tab:increments} that it is

1050: enough to include the following energy increments:

1051: %

1052: \begin{equation}

1053:   \label{eq:corrpoly}

1054:   \Cal E_{\rm corr} \approx \Delta \varepsilon_0 + \Delta \varepsilon_{01}

1055:   + \Delta \varepsilon_{02} \; .

1056: \end{equation}

1057: %

1058: Hence, it is sufficient to correlate

1059: the electrons in the Wannier orbitals of only two

1060: monomers at a time for \HF{} and \HCl{}~chains

1061: in which more distant two-body energy increments contribute

1062: only $-8 \U{\mu E_h}$~for~\HF{} and $-12 \U{\mu E_h}$~for~\HCl{}

1063: as shown in Sec.~\ref{sec:long}.

1064: In three-dimensional crystals, three-body terms

1065: become more important according to the analyses in

1066: Refs.~\onlinecite{Axilrod:IV-43,Fink:AI-95,Rosciszewski:AI-00}

1067: and the much larger number of three-body energy increments

1068: compared with the number of two-body energy increments.

1069: 

1070: We report~$\Delta E$ based on the approximation

1071: of Eq.~(\ref{eq:corrpoly}) as obtained by basis-set

1072: extrapolation~\cite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05} in Tab.~\ref{tab:bindtotal}.

1073: Using density functional theory, Hirata and Iwata~\cite{Hirata:AI-98}

1074: find at optimized geometries for the total binding energy

1075: of~\HF{} $-13.521 \mHartree$ (BLYP) and $-13.864 \mHartree$ (B3LYP)

1076: [utilizing the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set] which are larger in magnitude

1077: by~$14\%$ and $17\%$, respectively, than our result

1078: for the experimental geometry.

1079: The observed differences can be partially ascribed

1080: to the different geometries used;

1081: our experimental geometry leads to a binding energy that is

1082: somewhat smaller in magnitude than the binding energy in

1083: the optimized geometry.

1084: The 6-311++G(d,p) basis set of Iwata and Hirata~\cite{Hirata:AI-98} also

1085: differs substantially from our choices

1086: in Refs.~\onlinecite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}.

1087: Above all, we do not consider the impact of triple excitations in our study;

1088: they increase the absolute value of the short-range correlation

1089: contributions and, consequently, also the absolute value of

1090: the binding energies.

1091: 

1092: 

1093: \section{Conclusion}

1094: \label{sec:conclusion}

1095: 

1096: \begin{table}

1097: %

1098: % HF Hartree-Fock binding energy per monomer: -11.82525 mEh

1099: % Mean of all least squares fitted Hartree-Fock binding energies:

1100: % ((-10.199) + (-10.194) + (-10.194) + (-10.222)) / 4 = -10.20225 mEh = -0.27761735 eV

1101: %

1102: % Mean of the best extrapolated CCSD binding energies:

1103: % ((-1.655) + (-1.606) + (-1.646) + (-1.585)) / 4 = -1.623 mEh = -0.044164 eV

1104: %

1105: %

1106: %

1107: % HCl Hartree-Fock binding energy per monomer: -3.34975 mEh

1108: % Mean of all least squares fitted Hartree-Fock binding energies:

1109: % ((-0.596) + (-0.586) + (-0.584) + (-0.577)) / 4 = -0.58575 mEh = -0.0159391 eV

1110: %

1111: % Mean of the best extrapolated CCSD binding energies:

1112: % ((-2.773) + (-2.747) + (-2.774) + (-2.762)) / 4 = -2.764 mEh = -0.075212 eV

1113: %

1114: %

1115:   \centering

1116:   \begin{ruledtabular}

1117:     \begin{tabular}{rdd}

1118:                    & $\HF{}$ & $\HCl{}$ \\

1119:       \hline

1120:       $\Delta E_{\rm SCF}(\infty)$  & -10.202 & -0.586 \\

1121:       $\Delta E_{\rm corr}(\infty)$ &  -1.623 & -2.764 \\

1122:       $\Delta E(\infty)$            & -11.826 & -3.350 \\

1123:     \end{tabular}

1124:   \end{ruledtabular}

1125:   \caption{Basis-set-extrapolated total binding energies per

1126:            monomer~$\Delta E(\infty)$ of~\HF{} and \HCl{}~chains and their

1127:            decomposition into basis-set-extrapolated

1128:            Hartree-Fock~$\Delta E_{\rm SCF}(\infty)$ and

1129:            electron correlation~$\Delta E_{\rm corr}(\infty)$

1130:            contributions.

1131:            All data are taken from Refs.~\onlinecite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}

1132:            and are given in millihartrees.}

1133:   \label{tab:bindtotal}

1134: \end{table}

1135: 

1136: 

1137: We study hydrogen bonding in infinite \HF{} and \HCl{} chains.

1138: Whereas in~\HF{} the Hartree-Fock contribution dominates the total

1139: binding energy

1140: %

1141: % -10.202 / -11.826 = 86.27%

1142: %

1143: by~$86\%$ due to the electrostatic contribution of the rather ionic

1144: HF~monomers, in the much more weakly bound~\HCl{}, the Hartree-Fock

1145: calculation yields

1146: %

1147: % -0.586 /  -3.350 = 17.49%

1148: %

1149: only~$18\%$ of the binding energy [Tab.~\ref{tab:bindtotal}].

1150: The transitional character of hydrogen-bonded crystals between the

1151: ionic and van der Waals regimes is reflected in these numbers.

1152: The very weak hydrogen bonds in the \HCl{} chains bear a

1153: close resemblance to purely van der Waals-bonded systems,

1154: like rare-gas solids, where

1155: bonding is entirely caused by electron

1156: correlations.~\cite{Fink:AI-95,Rosciszewski:AI-99,%

1157: Rosciszewski:AI-00}

1158: In fact only the inclusion of electron correlations

1159: puts the binding energy per monomer of the \HCl{} chain

1160: into the range conventionally ascribed to hydrogen

1161: bonding,~\cite{Pauling:NC-93}

1162: %

1163: % Pauling gives for hydrogen bonding the range 2 to 10 kJ / mol

1164: % per bond.

1165: %

1166: %  2 kJ / mol =  2 * 4.184 / 96.485 / 27.2113845 * 1000 mE_h

1167: %            =  3.187 mE_h

1168: %

1169: % 10 kJ / mol = 10 * 4.184 / 96.485 / 27.2113845 * 1000 mE_h

1170: %            = 15.936 mE_h

1171: %

1172: namely~\hbox{$3$--$16 \mHartree$}.

1173: 

1174: The incremental scheme, which provides a decomposition of the

1175: contribution of electron correlations to the binding energy of the

1176: chains in terms of nonadditive many-body energy increments,

1177: is shown to converge rapidly with respect to the number

1178: of monomers, \ie, bodies, involved in the energy increments

1179: and the distance among them, thus providing a

1180: good tool to study hydrogen bonding in crystals.

1181: In contrast to three-dimensional crystals, the dominant

1182: contribution of electron correlations to the binding energies of

1183: the infinite chains is, in the present investigation,

1184: already given by pair interactions

1185: between the valence electrons of a monomer and its nearest

1186: and next-nearest neighbors.

1187: The $K$-body energy increments represent a general framework

1188: to describe van der Waals dispersion

1189: interaction among the electrons from $K$~one-body orbital sets.

1190: The decay of the two-body energy increments,

1191: \ie, the electron correlations between two monomers in the

1192: chains, with the intermonomer distance is investigated and

1193: van der Waals constants are determined,

1194: which affords a partition of the energy increments

1195: into a short-range, van der Waals-reduced part

1196: and a long-range part that can be summed analytically

1197: to infinite distances.

1198: 

1199: This partitioning affords a methodological advancement;

1200: if the van der Waals constants of a crystal

1201: are available from other sources, then the number of energy increments

1202: in the incremental expansion can be reduced by considering only

1203: van der Waals-reduced energy increments;

1204: they typically need to comprise only the nearest- and

1205: next-nearest-neighbor energy increments.

1206: The small number of van der Waals-reduced energy increments

1207: permits one to significantly decrease the number of energy

1208: increments which have actually to be calculated

1209: to reach a certain accuracy of the correlation energy

1210: compared with the conventional incremental series.

1211: Furthermore, the long-range part turns out to be

1212: well described using small (double-$\zeta$) basis

1213: sets---in contrast to the short-range part where basis-set

1214: extrapolation is required for an accurate

1215: description~\cite{Buth:BS-04,Buth:MC-05}---thus facilitating

1216: further computational savings.

1217: 

1218: 

1219: \begin{acknowledgments}

1220: We are highly indebted to Uwe Birkenheuer, Krzysztof Ro\'sciszewski,

1221: Hermann Stoll, and Peter Fulde for helpful discussions and

1222: a critical reading of the manuscript.

1223: \end{acknowledgments}

1224: 

1225: 

1226: \begin{thebibliography}{77}

1227: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

1228: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax

1229:   \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi

1230: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax

1231:   \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi

1232: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax

1233:   \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi

1234: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax

1235:   \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi

1236: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi

1237: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}

1238: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}

1239: 

1240: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Atoji and Lipscomb}(1954)}]{Atoji:CS-54}

1241: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Atoji}} \bibnamefont{and}

1242:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~N.} \bibnamefont{Lipscomb}},

1243:   \bibinfo{journal}{Acta. Cryst.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{7}},

1244:   \bibinfo{pages}{173} (\bibinfo{year}{1954}).

1245: 

1246: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Habuda and Gagarinsky}(1971)}]{Habuda:NM-71}

1247: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~P.} \bibnamefont{Habuda}} \bibnamefont{and}

1248:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.~V.} \bibnamefont{Gagarinsky}},

1249:   \bibinfo{journal}{Acta. Cryst.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B27}},

1250:   \bibinfo{pages}{1677} (\bibinfo{year}{1971}).

1251: 

1252: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Johnson et~al.}(1975)\citenamefont{Johnson, S\'andor,

1253:   and Arzi}}]{Johnson:CS-75}

1254: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~W.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},

1255:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{S\'andor}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1256:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Arzi}},

1257:   \bibinfo{journal}{Acta. Cryst.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B31}},

1258:   \bibinfo{pages}{1998} (\bibinfo{year}{1975}).

1259: 

1260: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Otto and Steinborn}(1986)}]{Otto:BE-86}

1261: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Otto}} \bibnamefont{and}

1262:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~O.} \bibnamefont{Steinborn}},

1263:   \bibinfo{journal}{Solid State Communications} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{58}},

1264:   \bibinfo{pages}{281} (\bibinfo{year}{1986}).

1265: 

1266: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Panas}(1993)}]{Panas:HF-93}

1267: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Panas}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Int.

1268:   J. Quantum Chem.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{46}}, \bibinfo{pages}{109}

1269:   (\bibinfo{year}{1993}).

1270: 

1271: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Berski and

1272:   Latajka}(1998{\natexlab{a}})}]{Berski:DHF-98}

1273: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Berski}} \bibnamefont{and}

1274:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Z.}~\bibnamefont{Latajka}},

1275:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Mol. Struct.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{450}},

1276:   \bibinfo{pages}{259} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}{\natexlab{a}}).

1277: 

1278: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{S\'andor and

1279:   Farrow}(1967{\natexlab{a}})}]{Sandor:CS-67}

1280: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{S\'andor}} \bibnamefont{and}

1281:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~F.~C.} \bibnamefont{Farrow}},

1282:   \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{213}},

1283:   \bibinfo{pages}{171} (\bibinfo{year}{1967}{\natexlab{a}}).

1284: 

1285: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{S\'andor and

1286:   Farrow}(1967{\natexlab{b}})}]{Sandor:CC-67}

1287: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{S\'andor}} \bibnamefont{and}

1288:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~F.~C.} \bibnamefont{Farrow}},

1289:   \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{215}},

1290:   \bibinfo{pages}{1265} (\bibinfo{year}{1967}{\natexlab{b}}).

1291: 

1292: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{S\'andor and Farrow}(1969)}]{Sandor:ND-69}

1293: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{S\'andor}} \bibnamefont{and}

1294:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~F.~C.} \bibnamefont{Farrow}},

1295:   \bibinfo{journal}{Disc. Faraday Soc.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{48}},

1296:   \bibinfo{pages}{78} (\bibinfo{year}{1969}).

1297: 

1298: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hamilton and Ibers}(1968)}]{Hamilton:HB-68}

1299: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~C.} \bibnamefont{Hamilton}} \bibnamefont{and}

1300:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~A.} \bibnamefont{Ibers}},

1301:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Hydrogen bonding in solids}}

1302:   (\bibinfo{publisher}{Benjamin}, \bibinfo{address}{New York, Amsterdam},

1303:   \bibinfo{year}{1968}).

1304: 

1305: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pauling}(1993)}]{Pauling:NC-93}

1306: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Pauling}},

1307:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{The nature of the chemical bond and the structure of

1308:   molecules and crystals}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{Cornell University Press},

1309:   \bibinfo{address}{Ithaca (New York)}, \bibinfo{year}{1993}),

1310:   \bibinfo{edition}{3rd} ed., ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{0-8014-0333-2}.

1311: 

1312: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Scheiner}(1997)}]{Scheiner:HB-97}

1313: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Scheiner}},

1314:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Hydrogen bonding---A theoretical perspective}}

1315:   (\bibinfo{publisher}{Oxford University Press}, \bibinfo{address}{New York,

1316:   Oxford}, \bibinfo{year}{1997}), ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{0-19-509011-X}.

1317: 

1318: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Had\v{z}i}(1997)}]{Hadzi:TT-97}

1319: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Had\v{z}i}}, ed.,

1320:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Theoretical treatments of hydrogen bonding}}

1321:   (\bibinfo{publisher}{John Wiley \& Sons}, \bibinfo{address}{Chichester, New

1322:   York}, \bibinfo{year}{1997}), ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{0-471-97395-5}.

1323: 

1324: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Karpfen}(2002)}]{Karpfen:CE-02}

1325: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Karpfen}}, in

1326:   \emph{\bibinfo{booktitle}{Adv. Chem. Phys.}}, edited by

1327:   \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Prigogine}} \bibnamefont{and}

1328:   \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{S.~A.} \bibnamefont{Rice}}

1329:   (\bibinfo{publisher}{John Wiley~\& Sons}, \bibinfo{address}{New York},

1330:   \bibinfo{year}{2002}), vol. \bibinfo{volume}{123}, pp.

1331:   \bibinfo{pages}{469--510}.

1332: 

1333: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Springborg}(1987)}]{Springborg:ES-87}

1334: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Springborg}},

1335:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{59}},

1336:   \bibinfo{pages}{2287} (\bibinfo{year}{1987}).

1337: 

1338: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Springborg}(1988)}]{Springborg:ES-88}

1339: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Springborg}},

1340:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.~B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{38}},

1341:   \bibinfo{pages}{1483} (\bibinfo{year}{1988}).

1342: 

1343: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Zunger}(1975)}]{Zunger:BS-75}

1344: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Zunger}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J.

1345:   Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{63}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1713}

1346:   (\bibinfo{year}{1975}).

1347: 

1348: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kert\'esz et~al.}(1975)\citenamefont{Kert\'esz, Koller,

1349:   and A$\rm\check{z}$man}}]{Kertesz:AI-75}

1350: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Kert\'esz}},

1351:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Koller}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1352:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{A$\rm\check{z}$man}},

1353:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{36}},

1354:   \bibinfo{pages}{576} (\bibinfo{year}{1975}).

1355: 

1356: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Karpfen and Schuster}(1976)}]{Karpfen:AI-76}

1357: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Karpfen}} \bibnamefont{and}

1358:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Schuster}},

1359:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{44}},

1360:   \bibinfo{pages}{459} (\bibinfo{year}{1976}).

1361: 

1362: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Blumen and Merkel}(1976)}]{Blumen:CC-76}

1363: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Blumen}} \bibnamefont{and}

1364:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Merkel}},

1365:   \bibinfo{journal}{Solid State Commun.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{20}},

1366:   \bibinfo{pages}{755} (\bibinfo{year}{1976}).

1367: 

1368: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Blumen and Merkel}(1977{\natexlab{a}})}]{Blumen:EB-77}

1369: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Blumen}} \bibnamefont{and}

1370:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Merkel}},

1371:   \bibinfo{journal}{phys. stat. sol. (b)} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{83}},

1372:   \bibinfo{pages}{425} (\bibinfo{year}{1977}{\natexlab{a}}).

1373: 

1374: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kert\'esz et~al.}(1978)\citenamefont{Kert\'esz, Koller,

1375:   and A$\rm\check{z}$man}}]{Kertesz:AI-78}

1376: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Kert\'esz}},

1377:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Koller}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1378:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{A$\rm\check{z}$man}},

1379:   \bibinfo{journal}{Z. Naturforsch. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{33}},

1380:   \bibinfo{pages}{249} (\bibinfo{year}{1978}).

1381: 

1382: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Karpfen}(1980)}]{Karpfen:AI-80}

1383: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Karpfen}},

1384:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{47}},

1385:   \bibinfo{pages}{401} (\bibinfo{year}{1980}).

1386: 

1387: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Karpfen et~al.}(1981)\citenamefont{Karpfen, Beyer, and

1388:   Schuster}}]{Karpfen:HB-81}

1389: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Karpfen}},

1390:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Beyer}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1391:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Schuster}},

1392:   \bibinfo{journal}{Int. J. Quantum Chem.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{19}},

1393:   \bibinfo{pages}{1113} (\bibinfo{year}{1981}).

1394: 

1395: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Beyer and Karpfen}(1982)}]{Karpfen:AI-82}

1396: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Beyer}} \bibnamefont{and}

1397:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Karpfen}},

1398:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{64}},

1399:   \bibinfo{pages}{343} (\bibinfo{year}{1982}).

1400: 

1401: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{I'haya et~al.}(1984)\citenamefont{I'haya, Narita,

1402:   Fujita, and Ujino}}]{Ihaya:AI-84}

1403: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.~J.} \bibnamefont{I'haya}},

1404:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Narita}},

1405:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Fujita}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1406:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Ujino}},

1407:   \bibinfo{journal}{Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{18}},

1408:   \bibinfo{pages}{153} (\bibinfo{year}{1984}).

1409: 

1410: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Liegener and Ladik}(1987)}]{Liegener:AI-87}

1411: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.-M.} \bibnamefont{Liegener}} \bibnamefont{and}

1412:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.} \bibnamefont{Ladik}},

1413:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.~B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{35}},

1414:   \bibinfo{pages}{6403} (\bibinfo{year}{1987}).

1415: 

1416: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Mayer et~al.}(1997)\citenamefont{Mayer, R\"ather, and

1417:   Suhai}}]{Mayer:CH-97}

1418: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Mayer}},

1419:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{R\"ather}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1420:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Suhai}},

1421:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{270}},

1422:   \bibinfo{pages}{211} (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).

1423: 

1424: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Berski and Latajka}(1997)}]{Berski:PHF-97}

1425: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Berski}} \bibnamefont{and}

1426:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Z.}~\bibnamefont{Latajka}},

1427:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem)} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{389}},

1428:   \bibinfo{pages}{147} (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).

1429: 

1430: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hirata and Iwata}(1998)}]{Hirata:AI-98}

1431: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Hirata}} \bibnamefont{and}

1432:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Iwata}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J.

1433:   Phys. Chem. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{102}}, \bibinfo{pages}{8426}

1434:   (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).

1435: 

1436: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Jacquemin et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Jacquemin,

1437:   Andr\'e, and Champagne}}]{Jacquemin:LR-99}

1438: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Jacquemin}},

1439:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.-M.} \bibnamefont{Andr\'e}},

1440:   \bibnamefont{and}

1441:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Champagne}},

1442:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{111}},

1443:   \bibinfo{pages}{5324} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).

1444: 

1445: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Buth and Paulus}(2004)}]{Buth:BS-04}

1446: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Buth}} \bibnamefont{and}

1447:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Paulus}},

1448:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{398}},

1449:   \bibinfo{pages}{44} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}),

1450:   \bibinfo{note}{\href{http://de.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0408243}

1451:   {arXiv:cond-mat/0408243}}.

1452: 

1453: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Buth}(2005)}]{Buth:MC-05}

1454: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Buth}},

1455:   \bibinfo{type}{Dissertation}, \bibinfo{school}{Technische Universit\"at

1456:   Dresden}, \bibinfo{address}{01062~Dresden, Germany} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}),

1457:   \bibinfo{note}{\href{http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:swb:14-1132580113554%

1458: -34509} {nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:swb:14-1132580113554-34509}}.

1459: 

1460: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Blumen and Merkel}(1977{\natexlab{b}})}]{Blumen:EBS-77}

1461: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Blumen}} \bibnamefont{and}

1462:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Merkel}},

1463:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{45}},

1464:   \bibinfo{pages}{47} (\bibinfo{year}{1977}{\natexlab{b}}).

1465: 

1466: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Berski and

1467:   Latajka}(1998{\natexlab{b}})}]{Berski:PHF-98}

1468: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Berski}} \bibnamefont{and}

1469:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Z.}~\bibnamefont{Latajka}},

1470:   \bibinfo{journal}{Polish J. Chem.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{72}},

1471:   \bibinfo{pages}{1540} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}{\natexlab{b}}).

1472: 

1473: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Halkier et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Halkier, Klopper,

1474:   Helgaker, J\o{}rgensen, and Taylor}}]{Halkier:BS-99}

1475: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Halkier}},

1476:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Klopper}},

1477:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Helgaker}},

1478:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{J\o{}rgensen}},

1479:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~R.}

1480:   \bibnamefont{Taylor}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.}

1481:   \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{111}}, \bibinfo{pages}{9157} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).

1482: 

1483: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Purvis~III and Bartlett}(1982)}]{Purvis:CC-82}

1484: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~D.} \bibnamefont{Purvis~III}}

1485:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~J.}

1486:   \bibnamefont{Bartlett}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.}

1487:   \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{76}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1910} (\bibinfo{year}{1982}).

1488: 

1489: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Stoll}(1992{\natexlab{a}})}]{Stoll:CD-92}

1490: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}},

1491:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{46}},

1492:   \bibinfo{pages}{6700} (\bibinfo{year}{1992}{\natexlab{a}}).

1493: 

1494: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Stoll}(1992{\natexlab{b}})}]{Stoll:CS-92}

1495: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}},

1496:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{191}},

1497:   \bibinfo{pages}{548} (\bibinfo{year}{1992}{\natexlab{b}}).

1498: 

1499: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Stoll}(1992{\natexlab{c}})}]{Stoll:CG-92}

1500: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J.

1501:   Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{97}}, \bibinfo{pages}{8449}

1502:   (\bibinfo{year}{1992}{\natexlab{c}}).

1503: 

1504: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Fulde}(1995)}]{Fulde:EC-95}

1505: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Fulde}},

1506:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Electron correlations in molecules and solids}}, vol.

1507:   \bibinfo{volume}{100} of \emph{\bibinfo{series}{Springer series in

1508:   solid-state sciences}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{Springer},

1509:   \bibinfo{address}{Berlin}, \bibinfo{year}{1995}), \bibinfo{edition}{3rd} ed.,

1510:   ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{3-540-59364-0}.

1511: 

1512: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Fulde}(2002)}]{Fulde:WF-02}

1513: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Fulde}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Adv.

1514:   Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{51}}, \bibinfo{pages}{909}

1515:   (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).

1516: 

1517: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Yu et~al.}(1997)\citenamefont{Yu, Kalvoda, and

1518:   Dolg}}]{Yu:IA-97}

1519: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Yu}},

1520:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Kalvoda}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1521:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Dolg}},

1522:   \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{224}},

1523:   \bibinfo{pages}{121} (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).

1524: 

1525: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Abdurahman et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Abdurahman,

1526:   Shukla, and Dolg}}]{Abdurahman:AI-00}

1527: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Abdurahman}},

1528:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Shukla}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1529:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Dolg}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J.

1530:   Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{112}}, \bibinfo{pages}{4801}

1531:   (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).

1532: 

1533: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Willnauer and Birkenheuer}(2004)}]{Willnauer:QC-04}

1534: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Willnauer}} \bibnamefont{and}

1535:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.}~\bibnamefont{Birkenheuer}},

1536:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{120}},

1537:   \bibinfo{pages}{11910} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).

1538: 

1539: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doll et~al.}(1995)\citenamefont{Doll, Dolg, Fulde, and

1540:   Stoll}}]{Doll:CE-95}

1541: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Doll}},

1542:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Dolg}},

1543:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Fulde}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1544:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}},

1545:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.~B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{52}},

1546:   \bibinfo{pages}{4842} (\bibinfo{year}{1995}).

1547: 

1548: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doll et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont{Doll, Dolg, and

1549:   Stoll}}]{Doll:CE-96}

1550: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Doll}},

1551:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Dolg}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1552:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}},

1553:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.~B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{54}},

1554:   \bibinfo{pages}{13529} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).

1555: 

1556: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doll and Stoll}(1997)}]{Doll:CP-97}

1557: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Doll}} \bibnamefont{and}

1558:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}},

1559:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.~B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{56}},

1560:   \bibinfo{pages}{10121} (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).

1561: 

1562: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doll and Stoll}(1998)}]{Doll:GS-98}

1563: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Doll}} \bibnamefont{and}

1564:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}},

1565:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.~B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{57}},

1566:   \bibinfo{pages}{4327} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).

1567: 

1568: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ro\'sciszewski

1569:   et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Ro\'sciszewski, Paulus, Fulde, and

1570:   Stoll}}]{Rosciszewski:AI-99}

1571: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Ro\'sciszewski}},

1572:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Paulus}},

1573:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Fulde}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1574:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}},

1575:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.~B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{60}},

1576:   \bibinfo{pages}{7905} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).

1577: 

1578: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ro\'sciszewski

1579:   et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Ro\'sciszewski, Paulus, Fulde, and

1580:   Stoll}}]{Rosciszewski:AI-00}

1581: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Ro\'sciszewski}},

1582:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Paulus}},

1583:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Fulde}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1584:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Stoll}},

1585:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.~B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{62}},

1586:   \bibinfo{pages}{5482} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).

1587: 

1588: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Szabo and Ostlund}(1989)}]{Szabo:MQC-89}

1589: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Szabo}} \bibnamefont{and}

1590:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.~S.} \bibnamefont{Ostlund}},

1591:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Modern quantum chemistry: Introduction to advanced

1592:   electronic structure theory}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{McGraw-Hill},

1593:   \bibinfo{address}{New York}, \bibinfo{year}{1989}), \bibinfo{edition}{{1st,

1594:   revised}} ed., ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{0-486-69186-1}.

1595: 

1596: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ladik}(1999)}]{Ladik:PS-99}

1597: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.} \bibnamefont{Ladik}},

1598:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rep.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{313}},

1599:   \bibinfo{pages}{171} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).

1600: 

1601: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{F\"orner}(1992)}]{Forner:LC-92}

1602: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{F\"orner}},

1603:   \bibinfo{journal}{Int. J. Quantum Chem.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{43}},

1604:   \bibinfo{pages}{221} (\bibinfo{year}{1992}).

1605: 

1606: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hirata et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont{Hirata, Podeszwa,

1607:   Tobita, and Bartlett}}]{Hirata:CC-03}

1608: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Hirata}},

1609:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Podeszwa}},

1610:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Tobita}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1611:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~J.} \bibnamefont{Bartlett}},

1612:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{120}},

1613:   \bibinfo{pages}{2581} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).

1614: 

1615: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Wiberg et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Wiberg, Holleman, and

1616:   Wiberg}}]{Holleman:IC-01}

1617: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Wiberg}},

1618:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~F.} \bibnamefont{Holleman}},

1619:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Wiberg}},

1620:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Inorganic chemistry}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{Academic

1621:   Press}, \bibinfo{address}{New York}, \bibinfo{year}{2001}), ISBN

1622:   \bibinfo{isbn}{0-123-52651-5}.

1623: 

1624: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Amos et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Amos, Bernhardsson,

1625:   Berning, Celani, Cooper, Deegan, Dobbyn, Eckert, Hampel, Hetzer

1626:   et~al.}}]{MOLPRO2002.6}

1627: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~D.} \bibnamefont{Amos}},

1628:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Bernhardsson}},

1629:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Berning}},

1630:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Celani}},

1631:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~L.} \bibnamefont{Cooper}},

1632:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~J.~O.} \bibnamefont{Deegan}},

1633:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~J.} \bibnamefont{Dobbyn}},

1634:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Eckert}},

1635:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Hampel}},

1636:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Hetzer}},

1637:   \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \emph{\bibinfo{title}{\textsc{molpro}, a package of

1638:   \emph{ab initio} programs designed by {H.-J.~Werner} and {P.~J. Knowles},

1639:   version 2002.6}} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).

1640: 

1641: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Boys}(1960)}]{Boys:MO-60}

1642: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~F.} \bibnamefont{Boys}},

1643:   \bibinfo{journal}{Rev. Mod. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{32}},

1644:   \bibinfo{pages}{296} (\bibinfo{year}{1960}).

1645: 

1646: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Foster and Boys}(1960)}]{Foster:MO-60}

1647: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~M.} \bibnamefont{Foster}} \bibnamefont{and}

1648:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~F.} \bibnamefont{Boys}},

1649:   \bibinfo{journal}{Rev. Mod. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{32}},

1650:   \bibinfo{pages}{300} (\bibinfo{year}{1960}).

1651: 

1652: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hampel et~al.}(1992)\citenamefont{Hampel, Peterson, and

1653:   Werner}}]{Hampel:CE-92}

1654: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Hampel}},

1655:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~A.} \bibnamefont{Peterson}},

1656:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.-J.}

1657:   \bibnamefont{Werner}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Phys. Lett.}

1658:   \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{190}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{1992}).

1659: 

1660: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Dunning, Jr.}}(1989)}]{Dunning:GBS-89}

1661: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~H.} \bibnamefont{{Dunning, Jr.}}},

1662:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{90}},

1663:   \bibinfo{pages}{1007} (\bibinfo{year}{1989}).

1664: 

1665: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kendall et~al.}(1992)\citenamefont{Kendall, {Dunning,

1666:   Jr.}, and Harrison}}]{Kendall:EA-92}

1667: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~A.} \bibnamefont{Kendall}},

1668:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~H.} \bibnamefont{{Dunning, Jr.}}},

1669:   \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~J.}

1670:   \bibnamefont{Harrison}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.}

1671:   \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{96}}, \bibinfo{pages}{6796} (\bibinfo{year}{1992}).

1672: 

1673: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Woon and {Dunning, Jr.}}(1993)}]{Woon:GBS-93}

1674: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~E.} \bibnamefont{Woon}} \bibnamefont{and}

1675:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~H.} \bibnamefont{{Dunning, Jr.}}},

1676:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{98}},

1677:   \bibinfo{pages}{1358} (\bibinfo{year}{1993}).

1678: 

1679: \bibitem[{bas()}]{basislib-04}

1680: \bibinfo{note}{Basis sets were obtained from the Extensible Computational

1681:   Chemistry Environment Basis Set Database, Version 02/25/04, as developed and

1682:   distributed by the Molecular Science Computing Facility, Environmental and

1683:   Molecular Sciences Laboratory which is part of the Pacific Northwest

1684:   Laboratory, P.O.~Box~999, Richland, Washington~99352, USA, and funded by the

1685:   U.S.~Department of Energy. The Pacific Northwest Laboratory is a

1686:   multi-program laboratory operated by Battelle Memorial Institute for the

1687:   U.S.~Department of Energy under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830. Contact David

1688:   Feller or Karen Schuchardt for further information.}

1689: 

1690: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pisani et~al.}(1988)\citenamefont{Pisani, Dosevi, and

1691:   Roetti}}]{Pisani:HF-88}

1692: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Pisani}},

1693:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Dosevi}}, \bibnamefont{and}

1694:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Roetti}},

1695:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Hartree-Fock ab initio treatment of crystalline

1696:   systems}}, vol.~\bibinfo{volume}{48} of \emph{\bibinfo{series}{Lecture notes

1697:   in chemistry}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{Springer}, \bibinfo{address}{Berlin,

1698:   Heidelberg}, \bibinfo{year}{1988}), ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{3-540-19317-0}.

1699: 

1700: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pisani}(1996)}]{Pisani:QM-96}

1701: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Pisani}}, ed.,

1702:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Quantum-mechanical ab initio calculation of the

1703:   properties of crystalline materials}}, vol.~\bibinfo{volume}{67} of

1704:   \emph{\bibinfo{series}{Lecture notes in chemistry}}

1705:   (\bibinfo{publisher}{Springer}, \bibinfo{address}{Berlin, Heidelberg},

1706:   \bibinfo{year}{1996}), ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{3-540-61645-4}.

1707: 

1708: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Saunders et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Saunders, Dovesi,

1709:   Roetti, Orlando, Zicovich-Wilson, Harrison, Doll, Civalleri, Bush, D'Arco

1710:   et~al.}}]{crystal03}

1711: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~R.} \bibnamefont{Saunders}},

1712:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Dovesi}},

1713:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Roetti}},

1714:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Orlando}},

1715:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~M.} \bibnamefont{Zicovich-Wilson}},

1716:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.~M.} \bibnamefont{Harrison}},

1717:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Doll}},

1718:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Civalleri}},

1719:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.~J.} \bibnamefont{Bush}},

1720:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{D'Arco}},

1721:   \bibnamefont{et~al.}, \emph{\bibinfo{title}{\textsc{crystal03} User's

1722:   Manual}}, \bibinfo{organization}{University of Torino},

1723:   \bibinfo{address}{Torino, Italy} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}),

1724:   \bibinfo{note}{\href{http://www.crystal.unito.it} {www.crystal.unito.it}}.

1725: 

1726: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{van Duijneveldt} et~al.}(1994)\citenamefont{{van

1727:   Duijneveldt}, {van Duijneveldt-van de Rijdt}, and {van

1728:   Lenthe}}}]{Duijneveldt:CP-94}

1729: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.~B.} \bibnamefont{{van Duijneveldt}}},

1730:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~G. C.~M.} \bibnamefont{{van Duijneveldt-van

1731:   de Rijdt}}}, \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~H.}

1732:   \bibnamefont{{van Lenthe}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Chem. Rev.}

1733:   \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{94}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1873} (\bibinfo{year}{1994}).

1734: 

1735: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Boys and Bernardi}(1970)}]{Boys:CP-70}

1736: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~F.} \bibnamefont{Boys}} \bibnamefont{and}

1737:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Bernardi}},

1738:   \bibinfo{journal}{Mol. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{19}},

1739:   \bibinfo{pages}{553} (\bibinfo{year}{1970}).

1740: 

1741: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Evjen}(1932)}]{Evjen:OS-32}

1742: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~M.} \bibnamefont{Evjen}},

1743:   \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{39}},

1744:   \bibinfo{pages}{675} (\bibinfo{year}{1932}).

1745: 

1746: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Pisani}(2003)}]{Pisani:LT-03}

1747: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Pisani}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J.

1748:   Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM)} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{621}}, \bibinfo{pages}{141}

1749:   (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).

1750: 

1751: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Craig and Thirunamachandran}(1984)}]{Craig:MQ-84}

1752: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~P.} \bibnamefont{Craig}} \bibnamefont{and}

1753:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Thirunamachandran}},

1754:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Molecular quantum electrodynamics}}

1755:   (\bibinfo{publisher}{Academic Press}, \bibinfo{address}{London},

1756:   \bibinfo{year}{1984}), ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{0-486-40214-2}.

1757: 

1758: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kumar and Meath}(1985)}]{Kumar:PS-85}

1759: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Kumar}} \bibnamefont{and}

1760:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~J.} \bibnamefont{Meath}},

1761:   \bibinfo{journal}{Mol. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{54}},

1762:   \bibinfo{pages}{823} (\bibinfo{year}{1985}).

1763: 

1764: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Klein and Venables}(1976)}]{Klein:RG-76}

1765: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{M.~L.} \bibnamefont{Klein}} \bibnamefont{and}

1766:   \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{J.~A.} \bibnamefont{Venables}}, eds.,

1767:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Rare gas solids}}, vol.~\bibinfo{volume}{1}

1768:   (\bibinfo{publisher}{Academic Press}, \bibinfo{address}{London},

1769:   \bibinfo{year}{1976}), ISBN \bibinfo{isbn}{0-12-413501-3}.

1770: 

1771: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Mor\'e}(1977)}]{More:LM-78}

1772: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.} \bibnamefont{Mor\'e}}, in

1773:   \emph{\bibinfo{booktitle}{Numerical analysis}}, edited by

1774:   \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{G.~A.} \bibnamefont{Watson}}

1775:   (\bibinfo{publisher}{Springer-Verlag}, \bibinfo{address}{Berlin, New York},

1776:   \bibinfo{year}{1977}), vol. \bibinfo{volume}{630} of

1777:   \emph{\bibinfo{series}{Lecture notes in mathematics}}, pp.

1778:   \bibinfo{pages}{105--116}.

1779: 

1780: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Axilrod and Teller}(1943)}]{Axilrod:IV-43}

1781: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~M.} \bibnamefont{Axilrod}} \bibnamefont{and}

1782:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Teller}},

1783:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{11}},

1784:   \bibinfo{pages}{299} (\bibinfo{year}{1943}).

1785: 

1786: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Fink and Staemmler}(1995)}]{Fink:AI-95}

1787: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Fink}} \bibnamefont{and}

1788:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{Staemmler}},

1789:   \bibinfo{journal}{J. Chem. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{103}},

1790:   \bibinfo{pages}{2603} (\bibinfo{year}{1995}).

1791: \end{thebibliography}

1792: \end{document}

1793: