1: \documentclass[prb,twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
3: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
4: \usepackage{bm}
5: %\usepackage{doublesp}
6: \usepackage{natbib}% bold math
7: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{Physical meaning and measurement of the entropic parameter $q$ in an inhomogeneous magnetic systems}
12:
13: \author{M.S. Reis}
14: \email{marior@fis.ua.pt}
15: \author{V.S. Amaral}
16: \affiliation{Departamento de F\'{i}sica and
17: CICECO, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro,
18: Portugal}
19: \author{R.S. Sarthour and I.S. Oliveira}
20: \affiliation{ Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas
21: Físicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150 Urca,
22: 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brasil}
23:
24:
25: \date{\today}
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: In this paper we present a thorough analysis of
30: two systems magnetically inhomogeneous: the
31: manganite La$_{0.7}$Sr$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$/MgO and the
32: amorphous alloy Cu$_{90}$Co$_{10}$. In both
33: cases, the non-extensive statistics yield a
34: faithful description of the magnetic behavior of
35: the systems. In the model proposed here, the
36: inhomogeneous magnetic system is composed by many
37: Maxwell-Boltzmann homogeneous bits and the
38: entropic parameter $q$ is related to the moments
39: of the distribution of the inhomogeneous
40: quantity. From the analysis of Scanning
41: Tunnelling Spectroscopy (STS) images, the $q$
42: parameter can be directly measured.
43:
44: \end{abstract}
45: %\pacs{}
46:
47: \maketitle
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50: Tsallis thermostatistics has been widely used in a number
51: of different contexts\cite{website}. The framework is applicable
52: to systems which, broadly speaking, present at least one of the
53: following properties: (i) long-range interactions, (ii) long-time
54: memory, (iii) fractality and (iv) intrinsic inhomogeneity
55: \cite{website,livro_tsallis}. Manganese oxides, or simply
56: manganites, seems to embody three out of these four ingredients:
57: they present Coulomb long-range interactions
58: \cite{PRB_64_2001_235127,PRB_64_2001_235128,science_283_1999_2034},
59: clusters with fractal shapes
60: \cite{PR_344_2001_1,PRB_66_2002_174436} and intrinsic
61: inhomogeneity
62: \cite{PR_344_2001_1,livro_dagotto,PRL_89_2002_237203,PRL_92_2004_126602,nature_428_2004_401}.
63: Indeed, in a sequence of previous publications
64: \cite{EL_58_2002_42,PRB_66_2002_134417,prb_68_2003_014404}, it has
65: been shown that the magnetic properties of manganites can be
66: properly described within a mean-field approximation using Tsallis
67: statistics.
68:
69:
70: \section{PHYSICAL PICTURE}
71:
72:
73: We consider an inhomogeneous magnetic system composed by many
74: homogeneous parts (clusters) with different sizes, each one of
75: them described by the Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics. By averaging
76: the magnetization over the whole system, we recover the Tsallis
77: non-extensivity. A relationship between the $q$ parameter and the
78: moments of the distribution is obtained. The model is tested using
79: Scanning Tunnelling Spectroscopy (STS) conductance maps, where the
80: $q$ parameter could be obtained and, consequently, the bulk
81: magnetization predicted. We also apply the results to describe the
82: magnetic behavior of Cu$_{90}$Co$_{10}$ amorphous ribbons.
83:
84: The starting point is a magnetic system formed by small regions,
85: or clusters of Maxwell-Boltzmann bits, each one of them with
86: magnetization $\mathcal{M}(\mu,T,H)$ given by the usual Langevin
87: function\cite{livro_APG}:
88: \begin{equation}\label{langevin}
89: \mathcal{M}(\mu,T,H)=\mu\left[\coth x-\frac{1}{x}\right]
90: \end{equation}
91: where $x=\mu H/kT$. The clusters are distributed in size, and
92: therefore in their net magnetic moment. Let $f(\mu)$ be the
93: distribution of the clusters magnetic moment. Thus, the average
94: magnetization of the sample will be given by:
95: \begin{equation}\label{mag_media_momento}
96: \langle\mathcal{M}\rangle=\int_0^\infty \mathcal{M}(\mu,T,H)f(\mu)
97: d\mu
98: \end{equation}
99:
100: On the other hand, Ref. \cite{prb_68_2003_014404,comentario1}
101: shows that the non-extensive magnetization is given by the
102: generalized Langevin function:
103: \begin{equation}\label{mag_generalizada}
104: \mathcal{M}_q=\frac{\mu_{ne}}{(2-q)}\left[\coth_qx-\frac{1}{x}\right]
105: \end{equation}
106: where $q\in\Re$ is the Tsallis entropic parameter and
107: $x=\mu_{ne}H/kT$.
108:
109: Equating the susceptibilities
110: \begin{equation}\label{equating}
111: \chi_q=\langle\chi\rangle\equiv\lim_{H\rightarrow 0}\frac{\partial
112: M}{\partial H}
113: \end{equation}
114: and the saturation values ($H\rightarrow \infty$) of Eqs.
115: \ref{mag_media_momento} and \ref{mag_generalizada}, we find a
116: analytical expression to the $q$ parameter:
117: \begin{equation}\label{q_momento}
118: q(2-q)^2=\frac{\langle\mu^2\rangle}{\langle\mu\rangle^2}
119: \end{equation}
120: where $\langle\mu\rangle$ and $\langle\mu^2\rangle$ are the first
121: and second moments of the distribution $f(\mu)$, respectively.
122: This result is valid for any $f(\mu)$, and is analogous to that
123: obtained by Beck \cite{PRL_87_2001_180601} and Beck and Cohen
124: \cite{PA_322_2003_267}.
125:
126: Now, let us consider a distribution of critical
127: temperatures. Again, the magnetization of a small
128: region is given by the usual Langevin function
129: (Eq.\ref{langevin}), however, within the
130: mean-field approximation, where:
131: \begin{equation}\label{x_mean_field}
132: x=\frac{\mu (H_0+\lambda \mathcal{M})}{kT}
133: \end{equation}
134: and $\lambda=3kT_C/\mu^2$ corresponds to the mean-field parameter.
135: Unfortunately, considering a distribution of critical
136: temperatures, the average magnetization
137: \begin{equation}\label{mag_media_tc}
138: \langle\mathcal{M}\rangle=\int_0^\infty
139: \mathcal{M}(\mu,T,H_0,T_C,\mathcal{M})f(T_C)dT_C
140: \end{equation}
141: can not be reduced in a similar fashion to what was done in the
142: case of a distribution of magnetic moments. Thus, a closed and
143: simple expression connecting the $q$ parameter and the moments of
144: the distribution of critical temperatures could not be obtained.
145: However, as will be discussed, the connection with experimental
146: results will provide some suggestions.
147:
148: \section{Connections with experimental results}
149:
150: \subsection{Distribution of magnetic moments}
151:
152: As discussed before, the $q$ parameter is related to the moments
153: of the distribution of magnetic moments (Eq. \ref{q_momento}).
154: Thus, to measure the entropic parameter we need to measure,
155: \emph{a priori}, the distribution of magnetic moments. Below, we
156: will discuss how to extract $f(\mu)$ from some experimental data.
157:
158: \subsubsection{Manganites}
159:
160:
161: Colossal magnetoresistance (CMR) effect\cite{livro_dagotto},
162: usually observed on manganites, has been proposed in terms of
163: intrinsic
164: inhomogeneities\cite{livro_dagotto,PR_344_2001_1,PRL_89_2002_237203},
165: which can lead to a formation of insulating and conducting domains
166: within a single sample, i.e., electronic phase separation in a
167: chemical homogeneous sample. The inhomogeneities alter the local
168: electronic and magnetic properties of the sample and should
169: therefore be visible via STS
170: \cite{nature_416_2002_518,science_285_1999_1540,PRL_89_2002_237203}
171: or Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM)
172: \cite{science_276_1997_2006,science_298_2002_805}.
173:
174: Becker and co-workers\cite{PRL_89_2002_237203}
175: measured STS in a La$_{0.7}$Sr$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$/MgO
176: thin film and visualized a domain structure of
177: conducting (ferromagnetic) and insulating
178: (paramagnetic) regions with nanometric size,
179: since this manganite has a transition from a
180: metallic phase (below T$_C$) to an insulating
181: phase (above T$_C$), with a strong phase
182: coexistence/competition around T$_C\sim$ 330 K.
183: These STS conductance maps obtained by those
184: authors at 87 K, 150 K and 278 K are reproduced
185: in figure \ref{reisfig1}(a). From these 1-bit
186: images (black regions mean
187: insulating/paramagentic phase and white regions
188: stand for conducting/ferromagnetic phase), it was
189: possible to determine the distribution of
190: clusters size. Considering that the cluster size
191: $\phi$, measured in \emph{pixels}, is
192: proportional to the magnetic moment $\mu$ of the
193: cluster, Eq. \ref{q_momento} can be re-written
194: as:
195: \begin{equation}\label{relacao.mi.fi}
196: \frac{\langle\phi^2\rangle}{\langle\phi\rangle^2}=\frac{\langle\mu^2\rangle}{\langle\mu\rangle^2}=q(2-q)^2
197: \end{equation}
198: The conductance map at 278 K has a distribution
199: of clusters as presented in figure
200: \ref{reisfig1}(a), and, using Eq.
201: \ref{relacao.mi.fi} we obtained from the data
202: $q=$2.95.
203: \begin{figure}
204: \begin{center}
205: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{reisfig1.eps}
206: \end{center}
207: \caption{(a) Scanning tunnelling spectroscopy
208: images obtained at different temperatures on
209: La$_{0.7}$Sr$_{0.3}$MnO$_3$/MgO manganite thin
210: film, after Becker \emph{et
211: al.}\cite{PRL_89_2002_237203}. White regions are
212: conducting (ferromagnetic phase) clusters and the
213: black regions are insulating clusters
214: (paramagnetic phase). The main graphic is the
215: cluster size distribution of the image at 278 K,
216: proportional to the cluster magnetic moment
217: distribution, where, using
218: Eq.\ref{relacao.mi.fi}, $q=2.95$ could be
219: directly obtained. (b) Using the mean-field
220: (reduced) generalized magnetization
221: (Eq.\ref{mag_generalizada}: $+$ symbol), we could
222: predict the bulk magnetization, in a satisfactory
223: agreement with the measured one ($\circ$ symbol),
224: in a reduced scale $\mathcal{M}/\mathcal{M}$(18
225: K)\cite{PRL_89_2002_237203}.} \label{reisfig1}
226: \end{figure}
227:
228: With this value of $q$, the total magnetization
229: of the system can be predicted, by considering
230: the mean-field approximation into the generalized
231: magnetization (Eq.\ref{mag_generalizada}), where
232: $x=3m_q/t$, $m_q=\mathcal{M}_q/\mu_{ne}$,
233: $t=T/T_C^{(1)}$ and $T_C^{(1)}=298
234: K$\cite{EL_58_2002_42} (see refs.
235: \cite{prb_68_2003_014404,EL_58_2002_42} for
236: details concerning the mean-field approximation
237: applied to the non-extensive magnetization). This
238: procedure results in a satisfactory agreement
239: between the predicted reduced magnetization
240: ($m_q=$0.25; the $+$ symbol) and the experimental
241: one (the $\circ$ symbol), obtained measuring the
242: bulk magnetization\cite{PRL_89_2002_237203}, as
243: presented in figure \ref{reisfig1}(b). The images
244: at 87 K and 150 K were not analyzed, since the
245: clusters have already percolated.
246:
247: The procedure above described shows how to extract the $q$
248: parameter from an experimental data, and then how to apply the
249: obtained $q$ parameter to predict macroscopic quantities of the
250: system. In addition, these results exemplify the relation between
251: non-extensivity and microscopic inhomogeneities. Finally, it is
252: important to stress that $q$ is related to the dynamics of the
253: system, since it measures the distribution of magnetic moments,
254: that contains the dynamics.
255:
256: \subsubsection{Granular Alloys}
257:
258: Ferrari and co-workers\cite{prb_56_1997_6086}
259: analyzed some melt-spun Cu$_{90}$Co$_{10}$
260: ribbons, materials intrinsically
261: inhomogeneous\cite{jnn_4_2004_1056,PRB_63_2001_014408}.
262: They considered Eq.\ref{mag_media_momento} to
263: study the magnetic behavior of these materials,
264: supposing a Log-Normal distribution of magnetic
265: moments:
266: \begin{equation}\label{lognormal}
267: f(\mu)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\;s\;\mu}\;\exp\left[-\frac{\ln^2(\mu/\mu_0)}{2\;s^2}\right]
268: \end{equation}
269: where the k$^{th}$ moment is $\langle
270: \mu^k\rangle=\mu_0^k\exp(k^2s^2/2)$.
271:
272: Those authors used this model to fit the
273: magnetization curves at room temperature, as
274: displayed in figure \ref{reisfig2}-top. The
275: fitting parameters for the sample (a) are
276: $\mu_0=500\mu_B$ and $s=1.16$; and for the sample
277: (b), $\mu_0=3900\mu_B$ and $s=0.93$. Both samples
278: are Cu$_{90}$Co$_{10}$, however, prepared under
279: different conditions\cite{prb_56_1997_6086}. With
280: these values and using Eqs.\ref{lognormal} and
281: \ref{q_momento}, we could obtain the $q$
282: parameter for both samples: (a) $q= 3.11$ and (b)
283: $q=2.90$.
284:
285: With those values of $q$, the non-extensive magnetic
286: susceptibility was obtained:
287: \begin{equation}\label{sus_generalizada_1}
288: \chi_q=\frac{q\mu_{ne}^2}{3kT}=\frac{q(2-q)^2\langle\mu\rangle^2}{3kT}
289: \end{equation}
290: and matches the experimental one, as presented in
291: figure \ref{reisfig2}-bottom.
292: \begin{figure}
293: \begin{center}
294: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{reisfig2.eps}
295: \end{center}
296: \caption{Top: Open circles are the experimental
297: results, whereas the solid lines correspond to
298: the average magnetization
299: (Eq.\ref{mag_media_momento}), considering a
300: Log-Normal distribution (Eq.\ref{lognormal}).
301: Bottom: dM/dH as a function of the applied
302: magnetic field, where the magnetic susceptibility
303: lies in the zero field limit. The predicted
304: non-extensive magnetic susceptibility matches the
305: experimental one, for both samples.}
306: \label{reisfig2}
307: \end{figure}
308:
309: \subsection{Distribution of critical temperatures}
310:
311: Campillo and co-workers\cite{jmmm_237_2001_61} analyzed the
312: magnetic properties of 200-nm thick films of
313: La$_{0.67}$Ca$_{0.33}$MnO$_3$, which were grown under identical
314: conditions onto five different single crystal substrates: MgO, Si,
315: NdGaO$_3$, SrTiO$_3$, LaAlO$_3$. The films exhibit a strong
316: substrate dependence of the magnetic properties, including, for
317: instance, different values of Curie temperature $T_C$. On the
318: other hand, the strain due to the growth mode induces
319: inhomogeneities on the
320: sample\cite{jmmm_237_2001_61,nature_428_2004_401}. Campillo
321: verified that these inhomogeneities depend on the substrate
322: character and therefore they determined the $T_C$ distribution for
323: each thick film.
324:
325: The authors considered that the magnetization of a small and
326: homogeneous region is given by:
327: \begin{equation}\label{magcrit}
328: \mathcal{M}(m_0,T_C,T,\beta)=m_0\left(1-\frac{T}{T_C}\right)^\beta\theta(T_C-T)
329: \end{equation}
330: where $\theta(x)$ is the Heavyside Step function. Supposing a
331: Normal distribution of Curie temperatures
332: \begin{equation}\label{ftc}
333: f(T_C)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}\;\sigma}\;\exp\left(-\frac{\left(T_C-\langle T_C\rangle\right)^2}{2\;\sigma^2}\right)
334: \end{equation}
335: where $\sigma$ is the standard deviation and $\langle T_C \rangle$
336: the first moment of the distribution, they could write the average
337: magnetization:
338: \begin{equation}\label{mag_media_momento_2}
339: \langle\mathcal{M}\rangle=\int_0^\infty
340: \mathcal{M}(m_0,T_C,T,\beta)\;f(T_C)dT_C
341: \end{equation}
342: and fit the corresponding $M$ vs. $T$ curves, for
343: all samples available. From those fits, the
344: authors could obtain a linear relationship
345: between the standard deviation $\sigma$ and the
346: mean value $\langle T_C\rangle$ of the samples
347: analyzed; $\langle T_C\rangle=272-1.6 \;\sigma$,
348: as presented in figure \ref{reisfig3}(a).
349: \begin{figure}
350: \begin{center}
351: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{reisfig3.eps}
352: \end{center}
353: \caption{(a) First moment $\langle T_C\rangle$ of
354: the Curie temperature distribution as a function
355: of the standard deviation $\sigma$, obtained
356: fitting the $M$ vs. $T$ curves of
357: La$_{0.67}$Ca$_{0.33}$MnO$_3$ manganites
358: deposited onto five different single crystal
359: substrates: MgO, Si, NdGaO$_3$, SrTiO$_3$,
360: LaAlO$_3$. After Campillo et al.
361: \cite{jmmm_237_2001_61}. (b) Curie temperature as
362: a function of the $q$ parameter, obtained from
363: the fit, using the generalized Brillouin
364: function\cite{PRB_66_2002_134417,EL_58_2002_42},
365: of the $M$ vs. $T$ curves of those manganites
366: referred in Table \ref{tab1}.} \label{reisfig3}
367: \end{figure}
368:
369: On the other hand, in our previous
370: work\cite{EL_58_2002_42}, we used the Generalized
371: Brillouin
372: function\cite{PRB_66_2002_134417,EL_58_2002_42},
373: a non-extensive magnetic equation of state, to
374: fit the $M$ vs. $T$ curves obtained from those
375: manganites presented in Table \ref{tab1}. From
376: that study emerges a linear relationship between
377: $T_C$, a quantity intrinsic to the material, and
378: the $q$ parameter, a quantity intrinsic to the
379: non-extensive statistics; $T_C=-283+581\; q$, as
380: presented in figure \ref{reisfig3}(b).
381: \begin{table}[tbp]
382: \caption{Manganites, and the respective
383: references, in which its $M$ vs. $T$ curves were
384: analyzed using the generalized Brillouin
385: function\cite{PRB_66_2002_134417,EL_58_2002_42}
386: in order to obtain the corresponding $q$
387: parameter. The Label column corresponds to the
388: figure \ref{reisfig3}(b). The choice of compounds
389: was made such as to cover a wide range of $T_c$
390: values within the ferromagnetic phase, but it was
391: random in any other aspect.} \label{tab1}
392: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
393: \hline Label & Compound & Ref. \\ \hline\hline A &
394: La$_{0.62}$Y$_{0.07}$Ca$_{0.31}$MnO$_{3+\delta }$ &
395: \cite{JAP_83_1998_7076} \\ \hline B &
396: La$_{0.875}$Sr$_{0.125}$MnO$_{3+\delta }$ &
397: \cite{PRB_54_1996_6172} \\ \hline C &
398: La$_{0.5}$Ca$_{0.5}$MnO$_{3}$ & \cite{PRB_62_2000_6437} \\ \hline
399: D & La$_{0.83}$Sr$_{0.17}$Mn$_{0.98}$Fe$_{0.02}$O$_{3}$ &
400: \cite{PRB_57_1998_8509} \\ \hline E &
401: La$_{0.89}$Sr$_{0.11}$MnO$_{3+\delta }$ & \cite{EL_58_2002_42}\\
402: \hline F & La$_{0.75}$Ba$_{0.25}$MnO$_{3}$ &
403: \cite{JMMM_219_2000_1} \\\hline G & La$_{0.5}$Ba$_{0.5}$MnO$_{3}$
404: & \cite{JMMM_219_2000_1} \\ \hline H &
405: La$_{0.7}$Sr$_{0.3}$Mn$_{0.9}$Ru$_{0.1}$O$_{3}$ &
406: \cite{APL_77_2000_2382} \\ \hline
407: \end{tabular}
408: \end{table}
409:
410: Comparing the results obtained by our
411: own\cite{EL_58_2002_42} (figure
412: \ref{reisfig3}(b)) and
413: Campillo\cite{jmmm_237_2001_61} (figure
414: \ref{reisfig3}(a)), we could estimate a relation
415: between the standard deviation $\sigma$ and the
416: $q$ parameter:
417: \begin{equation}\label{tcvsq}
418: \sigma\propto(1-q)
419: \end{equation}
420: reinforcing the idea that the $q$ parameter is related to the
421: inhomogeneities of the system. Note that, $q\rightarrow$1 imply in
422: $\sigma\rightarrow$0, i.e., the extensive (Maxwell-Boltzmann)
423: limit corresponds to the homogeneous case.
424:
425:
426: \section{Concluding remarks}
427:
428: Summarizing, in the present work we shown that the $q$ parameter
429: measures the inhomogeneity and dynamics of a given inhomogeneous
430: magnetic system. We stress that the measured $q$, obtained from
431: scanning tunnelling spectroscopy on manganites (a microscopic
432: information), is able to predict a thermodynamic quantity, the
433: bulk magnetization (a macroscopic information); the entropic
434: parameter contains the dynamics, connecting the microscopic and
435: macroscopic worlds. Thus, the present work shows a clear
436: combination of dynamics and statistics, the key role to describe
437: complex systems. The present model was also successful applied to
438: a series of La$_{0.67}$Ca$_{0.33}$MnO$_3$ thick
439: films\cite{jmmm_237_2001_61} and melt-spun Cu$_{90}$Co$_{10}$
440: ribbons\cite{prb_56_1997_6086}; and the results reinforce the
441: conclusions made in this work.
442:
443: \section{Acknowledgements}
444:
445: We acknowledge CAPES-Brasil and GRICES-Portugal.
446: MSR acknowledges the FCT Grant No.
447: BPD/23184/2005. We are also thankful to P.B.
448: Tavares and A.M.L. Lopes (sample preparation),
449: and M.P. Albuquerque and A.R. Gesualdi (some
450: discussion on image processing).
451:
452: \begin{thebibliography}{32}
453: \expandafter\ifx\csname
454: natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
455: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
456: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
457: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
458: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
459: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
460: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
461: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
462: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
463: \expandafter\ifx\csname
464: urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
465: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
466: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
467:
468: \bibitem[{web()}]{website}
469: \bibinfo{note}{For a complete and updated list of references, see the web site:
470: \texttt{tsallis.cat.cbpf.br/biblio.htm}}.
471:
472: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Tsallis}(2001)}]{livro_tsallis}
473: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Tsallis}},
474: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics and Its
475: Applications}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{Springer-Verlag},
476: \bibinfo{address}{Heidelberg}, \bibinfo{year}{2001}), chap.
477: \bibinfo{chapter}{Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics:
478: Historical Background and Present Status}, eds. S.~Abe and Y.~Okamoto.
479:
480: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lorenzana
481: et~al.}(2001{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{Lorenzana, Castellani, and
482: Castro}}]{PRB_64_2001_235127}
483: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Lorenzana}},
484: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Castellani}},
485: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.}
486: \bibnamefont{Castro}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B}
487: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{64}}, \bibinfo{pages}{235127}
488: (\bibinfo{year}{2001}{\natexlab{a}}).
489:
490: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lorenzana
491: et~al.}(2001{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont{Lorenzana, Castellani, and
492: Castro}}]{PRB_64_2001_235128}
493: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Lorenzana}},
494: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Castellani}},
495: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.}
496: \bibnamefont{Castro}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B}
497: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{64}}, \bibinfo{pages}{235128}
498: (\bibinfo{year}{2001}{\natexlab{b}}).
499:
500: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Moreo et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Moreo, Yunoki, and
501: Dagotto}}]{science_283_1999_2034}
502: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Moreo}},
503: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Yunoki}}, \bibnamefont{and}
504: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Dagotto}},
505: \bibinfo{journal}{Science} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{283}},
506: \bibinfo{pages}{2034} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
507:
508: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dagotto et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Dagotto, Hotta, and
509: Moreo}}]{PR_344_2001_1}
510: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Dagotto}},
511: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Hotta}}, \bibnamefont{and}
512: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Moreo}},
513: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rep.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{344}},
514: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
515:
516: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ausloos et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Ausloos, Hubert,
517: Dorbolo, Gilabert, and Cloots}}]{PRB_66_2002_174436}
518: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Ausloos}},
519: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Hubert}},
520: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Dorbolo}},
521: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gilabert}}, \bibnamefont{and}
522: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Cloots}},
523: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{66}},
524: \bibinfo{pages}{174436} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
525:
526: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dagotto}(2003)}]{livro_dagotto}
527: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Dagotto}},
528: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Nanoscale phase separation and colossal
529: magnetoresistance: The physics of manganites and related compounds.}}
530: (\bibinfo{publisher}{Springer-Verlag}, \bibinfo{address}{Heidelberg},
531: \bibinfo{year}{2003}).
532:
533: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Becker et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Becker, Streng, Luo,
534: Moshnyaga, Damaschke, Shannon, and Samwer}}]{PRL_89_2002_237203}
535: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Becker}},
536: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Streng}},
537: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Luo}},
538: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{Moshnyaga}},
539: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Damaschke}},
540: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Shannon}}, \bibnamefont{and}
541: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Samwer}},
542: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{89}},
543: \bibinfo{pages}{237203} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
544:
545: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kumar and Majumdar}(2004)}]{PRL_92_2004_126602}
546: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Kumar}} \bibnamefont{and}
547: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Majumdar}},
548: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{92}},
549: \bibinfo{pages}{126602} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).
550:
551: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ahn et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont{Ahn, Lookman, and
552: Bishop}}]{nature_428_2004_401}
553: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~H.} \bibnamefont{Ahn}},
554: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Lookman}}, \bibnamefont{and}
555: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~R.} \bibnamefont{Bishop}},
556: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{428}},
557: \bibinfo{pages}{401} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).
558:
559: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Reis et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{Reis,
560: Freitas, Orlando, Lenzi, and Oliveira}}]{EL_58_2002_42}
561: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{Reis}},
562: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~C.~C.} \bibnamefont{Freitas}},
563: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~T.~D.} \bibnamefont{Orlando}},
564: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~K.} \bibnamefont{Lenzi}}, \bibnamefont{and}
565: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.~S.} \bibnamefont{Oliveira}},
566: \bibinfo{journal}{Europhys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{58}},
567: \bibinfo{pages}{42} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}{\natexlab{a}}).
568:
569: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Reis et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont{Reis,
570: Ara\'{u}jo, Amaral, Lenzi, and Oliveira}}]{PRB_66_2002_134417}
571: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{Reis}},
572: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~P.} \bibnamefont{Ara\'{u}jo}},
573: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~S.} \bibnamefont{Amaral}},
574: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~K.} \bibnamefont{Lenzi}}, \bibnamefont{and}
575: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.~S.} \bibnamefont{Oliveira}},
576: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{66}},
577: \bibinfo{pages}{134417} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}{\natexlab{b}}).
578:
579: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Reis et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Reis, Amaral,
580: Ara\'{u}jo, and Oliveira}}]{prb_68_2003_014404}
581: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{Reis}},
582: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~S.} \bibnamefont{Amaral}},
583: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~P.} \bibnamefont{Ara\'{u}jo}},
584: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.~S.}
585: \bibnamefont{Oliveira}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B}
586: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{68}}, \bibinfo{pages}{014404}
587: (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
588:
589: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Guimarães}(1998)}]{livro_APG}
590: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~P.} \bibnamefont{Guimarães}},
591: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Magnetism and Magnetic Resonance in Solids}}
592: (\bibinfo{publisher}{John Wiley}, \bibinfo{address}{New York},
593: \bibinfo{year}{1998}).
594:
595: \bibitem[{com()}]{comentario1}
596: \bibinfo{note}{In our previous work\cite{prb_68_2003_014404}, we derived the
597: two-branched Generalized Langevin Function. However, further calculations
598: lead us to a more concise and general expression, valid for any real value of
599: $q$ and $x$ (Eq.\ref{mag_generalizada})}.
600:
601: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Beck}(2001)}]{PRL_87_2001_180601}
602: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Beck}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.
603: Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}}, \bibinfo{pages}{180601}
604: (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
605:
606: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Beck and Cohen}(2003)}]{PA_322_2003_267}
607: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Beck}} \bibnamefont{and}
608: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~G.~D.} \bibnamefont{Cohen}},
609: \bibinfo{journal}{Physica A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{322}},
610: \bibinfo{pages}{267} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
611:
612: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Renner et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Renner, Aeppli, Kim,
613: Soh, and Cheong}}]{nature_416_2002_518}
614: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Renner}},
615: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Aeppli}},
616: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Kim}},
617: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Soh}}, \bibnamefont{and}
618: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Cheong}},
619: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{416}},
620: \bibinfo{pages}{518} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
621:
622: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Fath et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Fath, Freisem,
623: Menovsky, Tomioka, Aarts, and Mydosh}}]{science_285_1999_1540}
624: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Fath}},
625: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Freisem}},
626: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~A.} \bibnamefont{Menovsky}},
627: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Tomioka}},
628: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Aarts}}, \bibnamefont{and}
629: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~A.} \bibnamefont{Mydosh}},
630: \bibinfo{journal}{Science} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{285}},
631: \bibinfo{pages}{1540} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
632:
633: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lu et~al.}(1997)\citenamefont{Lu, Chen, and
634: deLozanne}}]{science_276_1997_2006}
635: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.}~\bibnamefont{Lu}},
636: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Chen}}, \bibnamefont{and}
637: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{deLozanne}},
638: \bibinfo{journal}{Science} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{276}},
639: \bibinfo{pages}{2006} (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).
640:
641: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Zhang et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Zhang, Israel, Biswas,
642: Greene, and deLozanne}}]{science_298_2002_805}
643: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Zhang}},
644: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Israel}},
645: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Biswas}},
646: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~L.} \bibnamefont{Greene}},
647: \bibnamefont{and}
648: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{deLozanne}},
649: \bibinfo{journal}{Science} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{298}},
650: \bibinfo{pages}{805} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
651:
652: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ferrari et~al.}(1997)\citenamefont{Ferrari, Silva, and
653: Knobel}}]{prb_56_1997_6086}
654: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Ferrari}},
655: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Silva}}, \bibnamefont{and}
656: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Knobel}},
657: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{56}},
658: \bibinfo{pages}{6086} (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).
659:
660: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Murillo et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont{Murillo, Grande,
661: Etxeberria, DelVal, Gonzalez, Arana, and Gracia}}]{jnn_4_2004_1056}
662: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Murillo}},
663: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Grande}},
664: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Etxeberria}},
665: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{DelVal}},
666: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Gonzalez}},
667: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Arana}}, \bibnamefont{and}
668: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Gracia}},
669: \bibinfo{journal}{Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology}
670: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{4}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1056} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).
671:
672: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Panissod et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Panissod,
673: Malinowska, Jedryka, Wojcik, Nadolski, Knobel, and
674: Schmidt}}]{PRB_63_2001_014408}
675: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Panissod}},
676: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Malinowska}},
677: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Jedryka}},
678: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Wojcik}},
679: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Nadolski}},
680: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Knobel}}, \bibnamefont{and}
681: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Schmidt}},
682: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{63}},
683: \bibinfo{pages}{014408} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
684:
685: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Campillo et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Campillo, Berger,
686: Osorio, Pearson, Bader, Baca, and Prieto}}]{jmmm_237_2001_61}
687: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Campillo}},
688: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Berger}},
689: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Osorio}},
690: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Pearson}},
691: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Bader}},
692: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Baca}}, \bibnamefont{and}
693: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Prieto}},
694: \bibinfo{journal}{J. Magn. Magn. Mater.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{237}},
695: \bibinfo{pages}{61} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
696:
697: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{McGuire et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{McGuire, Duncombe,
698: Gong, Gupta, Li, Pickart, and Crow}}]{JAP_83_1998_7076}
699: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~R.} \bibnamefont{McGuire}},
700: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~R.} \bibnamefont{Duncombe}},
701: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~Q.} \bibnamefont{Gong}},
702: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gupta}},
703: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{X.~W.} \bibnamefont{Li}},
704: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~J.} \bibnamefont{Pickart}},
705: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~L.} \bibnamefont{Crow}},
706: \bibinfo{journal}{J. Appl. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{83}},
707: \bibinfo{pages}{7076} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
708:
709: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Mitchell et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont{Mitchell, Argyriou,
710: Potter, Hinks, Jorgensen, and Bader}}]{PRB_54_1996_6172}
711: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~F.} \bibnamefont{Mitchell}},
712: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~N.} \bibnamefont{Argyriou}},
713: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{Potter}},
714: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~G.} \bibnamefont{Hinks}},
715: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~D.} \bibnamefont{Jorgensen}},
716: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~D.} \bibnamefont{Bader}},
717: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{54}},
718: \bibinfo{pages}{6172} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
719:
720: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Levy et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Levy, Parisi, Polla,
721: Vega, Leyva, Lanza, Freitas, and Ghivelder}}]{PRB_62_2000_6437}
722: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Levy}},
723: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Parisi}},
724: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Polla}},
725: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Vega}},
726: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Leyva}},
727: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Lanza}},
728: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~S.} \bibnamefont{Freitas}},
729: \bibnamefont{and}
730: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Ghivelder}},
731: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{62}},
732: \bibinfo{pages}{6437} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
733:
734: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Tkachuk et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{Tkachuk, Rogackia,
735: Brown, Dabrowski, Fedro, Kimball, Pyles, Xiong, Rosenmann, and
736: Dunlap}}]{PRB_57_1998_8509}
737: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Tkachuk}},
738: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Rogackia}},
739: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~E.} \bibnamefont{Brown}},
740: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Dabrowski}},
741: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~J.} \bibnamefont{Fedro}},
742: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~W.} \bibnamefont{Kimball}},
743: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Pyles}},
744: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{X.}~\bibnamefont{Xiong}},
745: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Rosenmann}},
746: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~D.}
747: \bibnamefont{Dunlap}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B}
748: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{57}}, \bibinfo{pages}{8509} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
749:
750: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ju et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Ju, Nam, Lee, and
751: Shin}}]{JMMM_219_2000_1}
752: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~L.} \bibnamefont{Ju}},
753: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.~S.} \bibnamefont{Nam}},
754: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~E.} \bibnamefont{Lee}}, \bibnamefont{and}
755: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~S.} \bibnamefont{Shin}},
756: \bibinfo{journal}{J. Magn. Magn. Mater.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{219}},
757: \bibinfo{pages}{1} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
758:
759: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ranjan and Manoharan}(2000)}]{APL_77_2000_2382}
760: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~S.} \bibnamefont{Ranjan}} \bibnamefont{and}
761: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~S.} \bibnamefont{Manoharan}},
762: \bibinfo{journal}{Appl. Phys. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{77}},
763: \bibinfo{pages}{2382} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
764:
765: \end{thebibliography}
766:
767:
768:
769: \end{document}
770: