1: %\documentstyle[twocolumn,aps,epsfig]{revtex}
2: %\documentstyle[multicol,aps,psfig]{revtex}
3: \documentclass[floats,twocolumn,prl,aps]{revtex4}
4: %\documentstyle[floats,preprint,prl,aps,psfig]{revtex}
5:
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7:
8: \newcommand\beq{\begin{equation}}
9: \newcommand\eeq{\end{equation}}
10: \newcommand\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
11: \newcommand\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
12: \newcommand{\nonum}{\nonumber}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{\bf Excitations of a low-dimensional dimerized spin ladder
17: under a magnetic field.}
18:
19: \author{\bf Sujit Sarkar}
20: \address{\it PornaPrajna Institute of Scientific Research,
21: 4 Sadashivanagar, Bangalore 5600 80 and
22: Department of Condensed Matter Physics,
23: Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot-76100, Israel}
24:
25: \date{\today}
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: Here we study the dimerized spin ladder with nearest-neighbor ($J_1$) and next-nearest-neighbor
29: ($J_2$) anti-ferromagnetic interaction under a magnetic field. We predict the existence
30: of different magnetization plateaus for the presence of spin-Peierls interaction on both $J_1$ and $J_2$. Magnetization plateau
31: at $m=0$ for $J_1$ dimerization is spontaneous due to XY interaction, but it is absent for
32: $J_2$ dimerization, only intrinsic umklapp term leads to plateau (spin gap) state for some specific
33: values of XXZ anisotropy ($\Delta$) and $J_2$.
34: Here we predict a saturation plateau which
35: is the classical phase of the system. There are some numerical
36: support of our analytical approach already existing
37: in the literature. The transition from commensurate gapped phase to
38: incommensurate Luttinger liquid phase is the Mott-$\delta$ type of transition.
39: \vskip .4 true cm
40: \noindent PACS numbers: ~75.10.Jm-Quantized Spin Models
41: , 75.40.Cx-Static Properties (order parameters, static susceptibilities,
42: heat capacities, critical exponents etc)
43: , 75.45.+j-Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena in Magnetic Systems.
44:
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \maketitle
48:
49: %\begin{multicols}{2}
50:
51: \section{ 1. Introduction}
52:
53: One-dimensional and quasi-one-dimensional
54: quantum spin systems have been studied extensively for last few decades,
55: due to many unusual and interesting
56: findings from both experimental and theoretical sides.
57: The four observations which make the low-dimensional spin systems
58: particularly interesting are, (i) Haldane's conjecture for one-dimensional
59: anti-ferromagnetic spin systems \cite{hal}, (ii) the discovery of
60: high-temperature superconductivity and its magnetic properties at low doping
61: \cite{bed}, (iii) the discovery of ladder materials \cite{joh}, and (iv) response of the
62: spin-ladder/chain systems under a magnetic field
63: (gapped excitations, magnetization plateau, magnetization cusp,
64: and first order phase transition) \cite{chit,oshi,tot,shi,tone,kole,cab,mutt,oku,sato}.
65: It has been observed
66: that spin-1/2 ladder systems with the railroad geometry with an even number of legs are gapped,
67: while systems with an odd number of chains have gapless excitations \cite{dag,cha}.
68: However, the frustrated zigzag ladder
69: shows gapless spin liquid state or the gapped dimer state, depending
70: on the ratio of the exchanges of the rungs to the chains \cite{egg}.
71:
72: However, all these above mentioned studies are in the absence of magnetic field. The situation
73: become very interesting in presence of magnetic field. Then it is possible
74: for an integer spin chain to be gapless with partial magnetization and a half-odd-integer
75: spin chain to show a gap above the ground state for appropriate values of
76: magnetic field. It has been shown by different groups \cite{oshi,tot,shi,tone,kole}
77: that the magnetization of some systems
78: can exhibit plateaus at certain nonzero values for some finite ranges of the magnetic field.
79: The basic criteria for the appearance of magnetization plateau can be understood from the
80: extension of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem under a magnetic field. This implies that translationally
81: invariant spin chains in an applied field can be gapped without breaking translation symmetry
82: under the condition $S-m=$ integer, where $S$ is the spin
83: and $m$ is the magnetization state of the chain. In this gapped phase, magnetization plateau occurs for quantized
84: values of m. Fractional quantization can also occur, if accompanied by spontaneous breaking of
85: translational symmetry. Fractional quantization can be understood from the $S-m=$ non integer
86: condition. In this situation system is either in the gapless low lying states or the degenerate
87: ground state with spontaneous translational symmetry breaking in the thermodynamic limit.
88: Suppose a system is in the spontaneously translational symmetry breaking state, the ground state
89: should be degenerate (say q fold). In this situation ground state have q different eigenvalues of
90: translational operator , the degenerate states can be related to the spontaneous breaking of
91: translational symmetry to period of q sites in the thermodynamic limit. These conditions for the
92: appearance of plateau are the necessary but not the sufficient conditions. The nature and the
93: occurrence of the plateau also depend on the nature of the interaction present
94: in the system \cite{cab,mutt}.
95: Apart from this interesting plateau formation,the presence of magnetic field has also other
96: interesting effects on spin systems \cite{jap,pok,park,oku}.
97:
98: In our present study, we will study the effect of magnetic field on the
99: dimerized (both rung and leg), spin ladder. Here we predict the presence of
100: three fractionally quantized magnetization plateaus ($m=0,~1/4,~1/2$)
101: whereas the other fractionally quantized plateaus are absent. We mainly
102: stress on the study of leg-dimerization.
103: \cite{tot}.
104: Fig. 1 shows the zig-zag ladder with dimerized legs
105: (different chain exchange). Rung dimerization is the dimerization in $J_1$, which has not been shown
106: in the figure.
107: \begin{figure}
108: %\psfig{figure=j2deltafig.eps,scale=.2,angle=-90}
109: \includegraphics*[scale=.5,angle=-90]{j2deltafig.eps}
110: \caption{Schematic diagram of a spin ladder with different chain exchanges.}
111: \label{fig1}
112: \end{figure}
113: We compare our calculation and results at
114: each and every steps with rung dimerization with a marginally
115: new result in rung dimerization regarding the
116: XXZ anisotropy of NN interaction. In this work our approach is completely analytic,
117: we use abelian
118: bosonization and renormalization group method to study these model Hamiltonians. We compare
119: our results with the available numerical results. Sections of this article, are the following.
120: Section (2).
121: Hamiltonians and the general formulation of analytical calculations, with the analysis of
122: different magnetization plateau. Section (3) is devoted for discussions and conclusions.
123:
124: \section{ 2. Model Hamiltonians and Continuum Field Theoretical Study:}
125:
126: In this section we will present all general derivations of this paper, different
127: subsections for different magnetization plateaus, are the special limit of these general
128: derivations.
129: The model Hamiltonian for $J_2$ and $J_1$ dimerization are respectively,
130: \bea
131: H_A &=& J_1 \sum_{n}~( {{S}_n}(x) {{S}_{n+1}(x)}~+~
132: {{S}_n}(y) {{S}_{n+1}(y)} ~, \nonum \\
133: &&+ \Delta {{S}_n}(z) {{S}_{n+1}(z)} )+
134: J_2 \sum_{n} (1 - \delta (-1)^n) \vec{S}_n \cdot \vec{S}_{n+2} \nonum \\
135: && -{g {\mu}_B H} \sum_{n} {S_n} (z)
136: \label{hamB}
137: \eea
138: \bea
139: H_B &=& J_1 \sum_{n} (1 - \delta (-1)^n)~( {{S}_n}(x) {{S}_{n+1}(x)}~+~
140: {{S}_n}(y) {{S}_{n+1}(y)} , \nonum \\
141: & & +\Delta~~ {{S}_n}(z) {{S}_{n+1}(z)}~~) +
142: J_2 \sum_{n} \vec{S}_n \cdot \vec{S}_{n+2} \nonum \\
143: & & -{g {\mu}_B H} \sum_{n} {S_n} (z)
144: \label{hamA}
145: \eea
146:
147: Where n is the site index, x, y, and z are components of spin.
148: One can also recast the zigzag ladder as a linear chain with
149: NN and NNN exchange interactions \cite{sar1,gia2}.
150: $J_1$ and $J_2$ are the nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor
151: exchange coupling between spins, ${J_1}, {J_2}~\geq 0$,
152: $\Delta$ is z component anisotropy of NN exchange interaction. $\delta$ is dimerization
153: strength, it appear as a parameter in our Hamiltonian, the basic origin of this
154: parameter is the spin-phonon interaction.
155: $H$ is the externally applied magnetic field in the z direction. One can express
156: spin chain systems to a spinless fermions systems through
157: the application of Jordan-Wigner transformation. In Jordan-Wigner transformation
158: the relation between the spin and the electron creation and annihilation operators are
159: \bea
160: S_n^z & = & \psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_n - 1/2 ~, \nonum \\
161: S_n^- & = & \psi_n ~\exp [i \pi \sum_{j=-\infty}^{n-1} n_j]~, \nonum \\
162: S_n^+ & = & \psi_n^{\dagger} ~\exp [-i \pi \sum_{j=-\infty}^{n-1} n_j]~,
163: \label{jor}
164: \eea
165: where $n_j = \psi_j^{\dagger} \psi_j$ is the fermion number at site $j$.
166: \bea
167: {H}_{A1}~&=& - \frac{J_1}{2} ~\sum_n ~(\psi_{n+1}^{\dagger} \psi_n +
168: \psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_{n+1}) \nonum \\
169: && + J_1 \Delta \sum_n (\psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_n - 1/2) (\psi_{n+1}^{\dagger}
170: \psi_{n+1} - 1/2) ~,\nonum \\
171: && -g {{\mu}_B} H \sum_{n} (\psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_n - 1/2).
172: \label{ha1}
173: \eea
174: \bea
175: H_{A2}~&=& J_2 ~\sum_n ~( \psi_{n+2}^{\dagger} \psi_n + {\rm h.c.})
176: (\psi_{n+1}^{\dagger} \psi_{n+1} - 1/2) \nonum \\
177: && +~ J_2 ~\sum_n ~(\psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_n - 1/2)
178: (\psi_{n+2}^{\dagger} \psi_{n+2} - 1/2) .
179: \label{hA3}
180: \eea
181: \bea
182: H_{A3}~&=& -~J_2 \delta \sum_n (-1)^n ( \psi_{n+2}^{\dagger} \psi_n + {\rm h.c.})
183: (\psi_{n+1}^{\dagger} \psi_{n+1} - 1/2) \nonum \\
184: && - ~ J_2 \delta \sum_n (-1)^n ~(\psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_n - 1/2)
185: (\psi_{n+2}^{\dagger} \psi_{n+2} - 1/2).
186: \label{hb3}
187: \eea
188: There is a difference between the first term of Eq.4 with the first
189: term of Eq.5 and Eq.6, in Eq.4 first term present the hopping
190: whereas the first term in Eq.5 and Eq.6 are presenting the four
191: fermionic interaction. This difference arises due to the presence
192: of an extra factor $e^{- i \pi {n}_{j+1}}$ in the string of
193: Jordan-Wigner transformation for NNN exchange interactions.
194:
195: Similarly one can also recast the spin-chain systems with $J_1$
196: dimerization into the spinless fermions. The Hamiltonians are converted as
197: follows:
198: $H_{B1}~=~H_{A1}$, $H_{B2}~=~H_{A2}$ and
199: \bea
200: {H}_{B3}~&=& \frac{J_1}{2} ~\delta \sum_n (-1)^n ~(\psi_{n+1}^{\dagger} \psi_n +
201: \psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_{n+1}) \nonum \\
202: && -~J_1 \delta \Delta \sum_n ~(-1)^n (\psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_n - 1/2) (\psi_{n+1}^{\dagger}
203: \psi_{n+1} - 1/2),
204: \label{ha2}
205: \eea
206: In order to study the continuum field theory of these Hamiltonians, we recast the spinless
207: fermions operators in terms of field operators by this relation.
208: \beq
209: {\psi}(x)~=~~[e^{i k_F x} ~ {\psi}_{R}(x)~+~e^{-i k_F x} ~ {\psi}_{L}(x)]
210: \eeq
211: where ${\psi}_{R} (x)$ and ${\psi}_{L}(x) $ are describe the second-quantized fields of right- and
212: left-moving fermions respectively. The spin-Peierls compound, in the
213: absence of magnetic field, is Generally at half-filling.
214: In the absence of magnetic field ($H=0$), $k_F~=~\pm {\pi}/2$,
215: but we are interested to study the systems in presence of magnetic field, so we keep Fermi
216: momentum as arbitrary $k_F$.
217: One can simply absorb the finite magnetization in a shift of field $\phi$ by
218: $\phi~=~{\tilde {\phi} - \pi m x}$, where $m~=<S_z>$ .
219: In presence of
220: magnetic field Fermi momentum and magnetization ($m$) are related by this relation,
221: $k_F~=~~\frac{\pi}{2} ( 1~-~2 m)$ \cite{tot,gia2}.
222: We want to express the fermionic fields in terms of bosonic field by this relation
223: \beq
224: {{\psi}_{r}} (x)~=~~\frac{U_r}{\sqrt{2 \pi \alpha}}~~e^{-i ~(r \phi (x)~-~ \theta (x))}
225: \eeq
226: $r$ is denoting the chirality of the fermionic fields,
227: right (1) or left movers (-1).
228: The operators $U_r$ are operators that commute with the bosonic field. $U_r$ of different species
229: commute and $U_r$ of the same species anticommute. $\phi$ field corresponds to the
230: quantum fluctuations (bosonic) of spin and $\theta$ is the dual field of $\phi$. They are
231: related by this relation $ {\phi}_{R}~=~~ \theta ~-~ \phi$ and $ {\phi}_{L}~=~~ \theta ~+~ \phi$.
232:
233: Using the standard machinery of continuum field theory \cite{gog,gia2,sumo,tot},
234: we finally get the bosonized Hamiltonians
235: as
236: \bea
237: H_{0}~&=&~v_0 \int_{o}^{L} \frac{dx}{2 \pi} \{ {\pi}^2 : {\Pi}^2 : ~+~ :[ {\partial}_{x} \phi (x) ]^2 : \nonum\\
238: &&~+~ \frac{g_1}{{\pi}^2 }\int ~ dx~:[ {\partial}_{x} {{\phi}_L} (x) ]^2 :
239: + :[ {\partial}_{x} {{\phi}_R} (x) ]^2 : \nonum\\
240: &&~+~ \frac{g_2}{{\pi}^2 }\int ~ dx~
241: ({\partial}_{x} {{\phi}_L} (x) ) ({\partial}_{x} {{\phi}_R} (x) )
242: \label{bos1}
243: \eea
244: $H_{0}$ is the gapless Tomonoga-Luttinger liquid part of the Hamiltonian
245: with $v_0~=sink_F$. The analytical expressions for $g_1$ and $g_2$
246: (related with the forward scattering of fermionic field) are the following.
247: \beq
248: g_1~=~2 (\Delta ~-~ 2 J_2) ~{sin}^2 k_F ~+~ 2~J_2 ~ sin 2 k_F (\pi~+~sin 2 k_F) \nonum\\
249: \eeq
250: \beq
251: g_2~=~4 (\Delta ~-~ 2 J_2) ~{sin}^2 k_F ~+~ 4~J_2 ~ {sin}^{2} {2 k_F } \nonum\\
252: \eeq
253: The expression for $g_1$ and $g_2$ are the same of Ref. \cite{hal2}
254: and Ref. \cite{tot}
255: at $m=0$ ($k_F=\pi/2$).
256:
257: Analytical expressions for
258: different exchange interactions of Hamiltonian, $H_A$, are the following.
259:
260: \beq
261: H_{J2C1}~=~ \frac{J_2}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2}
262: \int dx :cos[4 \sqrt{K}\phi (x) ~-~ 4 k_F x~-~ 4 k_F a]: .
263: \eeq
264: \beq
265: H_{J2C2}~=~\frac{J_1 \Delta}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2}
266: \int dx :cos[4 \sqrt{K}\phi (x) ~+~ 4 k_F x~-~2 k_F a]: .
267: \eeq
268: \beq
269: H_{J2C3}= \frac{J_2 \delta}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2}
270: \int dx :cos[(\pi- 4 k_F)x~+~4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x) ~-~4 k_F a]:.
271: \eeq
272: Eq.13 and Eq.14 are presenting the umklapp scattering term
273: from the NN and NNN anti-ferromagnetic exchange interaction, Eq.15
274: is appearing due to the presence of dimerized interaction.
275: Analytical expressions for $K$ is the following.
276: \beq
277: K = {\Large[}\frac{1~-~(8/\pi)~J_2 ~{sin}^2 k_F ~+~ 4 J_2~cos k_F}
278: {1~+~(4/\pi) \Delta sin k_F~+~ 4 J_2 ~ cos k_F ( 1~+~2/\pi sin {2 k_F }) }{\Large]}^{1/2}.
279: \eeq
280: $v_0$ and $K$ are the two Luttinger liquid parameters.
281: The expression of K for $J_2 ~=0$ and $m=0$ is the same
282: as in Ref. \cite{gia2}.
283: During this derivation we have used the following relations:
284: ${\rho}_{R/L} ~=~\frac{-1}{\pi}{\partial}_{x} {\phi}_{R/L} (x)$ and
285: $[{\phi} (x) ~,~\Pi (x) ]~= i \delta (x-x')$, where
286: $\Pi (x)~=\frac{1}{\pi} \nabla \theta (x)$,
287: is the canonically conjugate momentum.
288: We have also used the following equations,
289: \beq
290: S^{z} (x)~= ~a ~[ ~\rho (x)~+~ (-1)^j ~ M(x) ~] ~.
291: \label{basic1}
292: \eeq
293: The bosonized expressions for $\rho$ and $M$ are given by
294: \bea
295: \rho (x) &=& ~-~ \frac{1}{\sqrt \pi} ~\partial_x \phi (x) ~, \nonum \\
296: M(x) &=& ~\frac{1}{\pi a} ~\cos (2 \phi (x)) ~.
297: \label{basic2}
298: \eea
299: Similarly one can calculate the analytical expressions for $J_1$ dimerization.
300: Totsuka \cite{tot} has already calculated the bosonized expressions for $J_1$ dimerization only
301: by using the symmetric convention of chiral fermions
302: ($,{\psi}_L ~\sim e^{-2 i {\phi}_L}$,
303: ${\psi}_R ~\sim e^{-2 i {\phi}_R}$),
304: and has expressed the sine-Gordon coupling, in terms of
305: dual field ($\theta$). Here we have expressed our all expressions in terms of bare phase field
306: ($\phi$), by
307: using the conventional practice of continuum field theory \cite{gog,gia2,sumo}.
308: During these derivations we assume
309: that $J_1 \gg J_2 ,~ \delta$. $J_2$ is in the unit of $J_1$. Here we neglect the
310: higher order
311: of $a$ than $a^2$.
312:
313: \subsection{ 2.1 Calculations and Results for $m=0$ Magnetization Plateau:}
314:
315: At first we discuss $m=0$ magnetization plateau, it corresponds $k_F ~=~\pm~ \pi/2$.
316: Here we study both the effect
317: of XXZ anisotropy ($\Delta$) and the spin-Peierls dimerization ($\delta$).
318: The effective Hamiltonian for $J_2$ dimerization become,
319: \beq
320: H_A = H_0 ~+~( \frac{J_2 ~-~\Delta}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2} )~\int dx :cos[4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x)]: .
321: \label{ha0}
322: \eeq
323: In this effective Hamiltonian (Eq.19), there is no contribution
324: from dimerized
325: interaction
326: due to the oscillatory nature of the integrand and it leads to a vanishing
327: contribution but the contribution of dimerized potential is present
328: in the NN exchange interaction.
329: Similarly the effective Hamiltonian for $J_1$ dimerization become,
330: \bea
331: H_B & = & H_0 ~+~ ( \frac{J_2 ~-~\Delta}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2} )~\int dx :cos[4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x)]: \nonum\\
332: && ~+~\frac{\delta}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2}\int dx :cos[(2 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x)]: .
333: \label{hb0}
334: \eea
335: This dimerization contribution for NN exchange interaction has
336: originated from the XY interaction. The other two contribution of $J1$ dimerization are from XXZ
337: anisotropy of NN exchange interaction and z-component of NNN
338: interaction.
339: In recent past, there are considerable disagreement in
340: conclusions.
341: Chen { $et~ al.$} \cite{chen} claimed that in the limit of small frustration the
342: spin-Peierls dimerization
343: in NNN exchange interaction destabilizes the isotropic Heisenberg fixed point, leading
344: to a new gapless Luttinger liquid phase with vanishing spin wave velocity. Our
345: study \cite{sar1} has found that spin-Peierls dimerization in NNN exchange interaction present an
346: irrelevant perturbation in the regime of small frustration. An explicit
347: derivation of this $m=0$ plateau is
348: relegated in the appendix.
349: In this limit Parolla {\it et al.} \cite{cap} have also studied this model,
350: and their conclusions are as the same as ours \cite{sar1}. So it is a time relevant problem,
351: present author would like
352: to see this limit of plateau phase more explicitly. Now we would like to discuss this situation
353: in the spinless fermions representation.
354:
355: For the case of $J_1$ dimerization, we only consider the dispersion of
356: free spinless fermions due to $J_1$,
357: because the spin-Peierls perturbation will act only
358: over the free spinless fermions due to $J_1$.
359: The energy dispersion is $ {\epsilon}_k = - J_1~ cosk$, so in zero magnetic field, $k_F=\pm~\pi/2$.
360: As a result wave vector ($Q= \pi$) of dimerized potential is commensurate
361: with the $2 k_F=\pi$ component of density wave and then it produce a gap
362: in the excitation spectrum.
363:
364: But the explanation for absence of, gapped state for $J_2$ dimerization is not so obvious.
365: Only the intrinsic dimerization due to NNN exchange
366: interaction can drive a system from gapless, spin-fluid, state to gapped dimer order
367: state as one obtained from the Majumdar-Ghosh model \cite{maj}.
368: Numerically it has predicted \cite{pati} for isotropic ($\Delta = 1$) $J_1$-$J_2$ spin chain that
369: the system drives from spin-liquid state to dimer order state for $J_2 ~=0.241 J_1$.
370: In our theoretical calculations, we predict this transition for $J_2 ~=0.167 J_1$.
371: Parola $et~al.$ have studied, numerically, the effect of $\delta$ on $J_2$ dimerization,
372: there conclusion is negative, as we obtain analytically.
373: It revealed from the variational study that the dimerization has only appreciable effect
374: for higher values of NNN \cite{sar1}.
375: It is clear from Fig. 2A of our study that the NNN exchange interaction helps to produce a
376: stable plateau phase for $J_1$ and $J_2 $ dimerization, if one only consider the umklapp term
377: due to the frustrating NNN exchange.
378: Inset of Fig. 2A, of our study present the variation of critical ${(\frac{J_2}{J_1})}_c$ with the
379: XXZ anisotropy.
380: Below the critical line system
381: display a short range anti-ferromagnetic order with gapless excitations by creating the
382: low lying spinon states and above the critical line it is the gapped dimer order state.
383: It reveals that lower values of $\Delta$
384: shift more the critical value of ${(\frac{J_2}{J_1})}_c$ to change the
385: phase from gapless spin-fluid phase to gapped dimer order phase. This is due to the
386: enhancement of quantum fluctuation of the fields for lower $\Delta$, {\it i.e.},
387: for the higher anisotropy.
388: \begin{figure}
389: %\psfig{figure=plateau2.eps,scale=.2,angle=0}
390: \includegraphics[scale=0.35,angle=0]{plateau2.ps}
391: \caption{Luttinger liquid parameter ($K$) versus $\frac{J_2}{J_1}$ for different magnetization
392: plateaus. A constant dashed line at $K=0.5$ is for eye guide line, which separating
393: the spin fluid and dimer order instability state.
394: D-O: dimer order instability state, S-F: spin fluid Luttinger liquid phase.
395: {\bf A:} Here we only focus at $m=0$ magnetization plateau.
396: Uppermost (dotted) curve is for $\Delta =0.3$ and the lowermost (solid) curve is
397: for $\Delta =1$. The intermediate curves are for $\Delta = 0.4, 0.5, 0.6.0.8, 0.9$ respectively
398: from upper to lower one. Inset shows the separation between the spin fluid and
399: dimer order instability state by a critical line. Here we present the shift of the
400: ${(\frac{J_2}{J_1})}_c$ with $\Delta$. {\bf B:} Here we present the
401: curves for different magnetization plateaus. $m=1/2$ is independent of $\Delta$ and
402: $\frac{J_2}{J_1}$ in contrast with $m=1/4 , 0$. The curves for $m=1/4 , 0$ plateaus are
403: for $\Delta = 0.4, 0.5, 0.6$ respectively from upper to lower one.}
404: \label{Fig. 2}
405: \end{figure}
406:
407: It is also clear from the Fig 2A and Fig. 2B that the Luttinger liquid
408: parameter ($K$) is the function of $\Delta$ and $J_2$ and applied magnetic field.
409: This dependence is
410: modifying the anomalous scaling dimension of the physical field through $K$
411: and the commensurability
412: properties of spin operator.
413: So we conclude that the effect of $J_2$ dimerization (intrinsic dimerization)
414: has pronounced effect near to the Heisenberg point ($\Delta=1$ and $K~=1/2$).
415: Spin gap is maximum at this point.
416: In the dimerized phase this excitations are triplet with a gap in the
417: excitation spectrum. One can conclude from the comparison of Fig. 2A (inset) of our study with the Fig.
418: 4 of Ref. \cite{cap}
419: that dimerization strength and XXZ anisotropy of NN interaction varying reciprocally,
420: as it should be. Cross and Fisher have studied the spin-Peierls dimerization problem for
421: NN anti-ferromagnetic spin chain \cite{cross}. They have predicted that spin gap $\propto {(\delta J)}^{2/3}$
422: . We also retrieve the same result on that special
423: limit of our general problem. Actually on that limit
424: spin gap is $\propto {(\delta J)}^{\frac{1}{2-K}}$ \cite{cross}. \\
425:
426: \subsection{ 2.2 Calculations and Results for $m=\frac{1}{4}$ Magnetization Plateau:}
427:
428: Here we discuss the occurence of a finite (nontrivial) magnetization plateau
429: We are considering the magnetization plateau at $ m=\frac{1}{4}$, it corresponds
430: $ k_F ~=~\pm \frac{\pi}{4}$.
431: The effective Hamiltonian for $J_2$ dimerization become,
432: \bea
433: H_A & = & H_{0} ~-~ ( \frac{J_2 ~+~\delta}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2} )~\int dx :cos[4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x)]:
434: \nonum\\
435: && + \frac{\Delta}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2}~\int dx :sin[4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x)]:.
436: \label{hj2}
437: \eea
438: Apparently it appears from the general derivation of section (2),
439: that the second and third terms of Eq. (\ref{hj2}) will be
440: absent due to the oscillatory nature of the integrand but this is not the case
441: when one consider the dimerized lattice. In dimerized lattice, reciprocal
442: lattice vector $G$ will change from $2 \pi$ to $\pi$ due to the change of the size of the
443: unit cell. It become more clear, if one write these terms as
444: $ ~\int dx :cos[ (G-4 k_F)x ~+~ 4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x)]:$.
445:
446: Similarly one can write the effective Hamiltonian for $J_1$ dimerization:
447: \bea
448: H_B & = & H_{0} ~-~\frac{J_2}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2}~\int dx :cos[4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x)]:
449: \nonum\\
450: && + \frac{\Delta~(1~+~\delta)}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2}~\int dx :sin[4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x)]:.
451: \label{hj3}
452: \eea
453: The analytical structure of Hamiltonian (Eq. \ref{hj3} ) is the same as in Ref.6 for $J_1$
454: dimerization.
455: The renormalization group equations for these type of interactions are \cite{tot,gog,gia2,kos,sub}.
456: \beq
457: \frac{dK}{dlnL}~=~ -4 {\pi}^2 K^2 {\delta}^2
458: \eeq
459: \beq
460: \frac{d \delta}{dlnL}~=~ (2~-~4 K) \delta
461: \eeq
462: It appears from these RG equations that to get a relevant perturbation, $K$ should be less than $1/2$.
463: It reveals from Fig. 3B that $K$ is exceeding the relevant value in our region of interest
464: to mature criteria for magnetization plateau. So the dimerization strength should exceed some critical
465: value (${\delta}_c$) to initiate the plateau phase.
466: These two equations are the Kosterlitz-Thousless equation for the system in this limit. At the critical point,
467: system undergoes Kosterlitz-Thouless transition \cite{tot,gog,gia2,kos,sub}.
468: Here we are not interested to present the renormalization group flow diagram because it
469: has already discussed in Ref. \cite{tot}. The relation between the compactification radius ($R$) of Ref. \cite{tot}
470: and the Luttinger liquid parameter ($K$) of our study is $K~=~R^2$.
471: As we have mentioned that this phase diagram has already explored explicitly
472: \cite{tot,gog,gia2,kos,sub,suj2},
473: so we only present the relevant part of the phase diagram following Totsuka \cite{tot} and Tonegawa\cite{tone}:
474: since the system flows to the strong coupling (dimer-order) as the dimerization strength exceeds some critical
475: value (${\delta}_c$) initially, we have to guess the physics of this phase. We analyze the system in the
476: limit $\delta~ \rightarrow \pm \infty$ and $K~ \rightarrow 0$. In this limit we can expect that
477: the value of $\phi$ is pinned at one of the minima of $cos( 4 \sqrt{K} \phi)$.
478: This parameter dependent transition, from massless phase to massive phase, at $T=0$ is
479: the quantum phase transition \cite{sub}. This quantum phase transition is occurring at the beginning
480: and end of each magnetization plateau.
481:
482: \subsection{ 2.3 Calculations and Results for $m=\frac{1}{2}$ Magnetization Plateau:}
483:
484: Now we discuss the saturation plateau at $m= \frac{1}{2}$ ($k_F ~=~0$).
485: $K_F ~=~0$ implies that the band is empty and the dispersion is not linear, so the
486: validity of the continuum field theory is questionable. Values of the two
487: Luttinger
488: liquid parameters, $v_0$ and $K$, are $0$ and $1$ respectively.
489: It also implies that none of the sine-Gordon coupling terms become
490: relevant in this parameter
491: space.
492: Saturation plateaus are only appearing due to very high values of magnetic field.
493: In this plateau system is in ferromagnetic ground
494: state and restore the lattice translational symmetry.
495: We think, this is the classical phase of the system.
496: Recently Cabra {\it et al} have studied
497: the magnetization plateau for two leg ladder system with dimerized leg \cite{cab}. The configuration
498: of leg dimerization is different from our present study, Fig. 1. In this configuration,
499: each leg is dimerized by bond alternation and the two legs are connected by a rung coupling.
500: In their study relevant operator
501: arises from a combined effect of the interchain coupling and the dimerization along the chain.
502: This plateau is the manifestation of applied potential not due to the higher values of magnetic
503: field. This phase is the quantum phase of the system.
504:
505: Here we present the possible explanation for the absence of other fractionally
506: quantized magnetization plateaus (like $\frac{1}{3},\frac{1}{5}$ etc):
507: A carefull examination of Eq. 13 to Eq. 15 reveals that to get a nonoscillatory
508: contribution from Hamiltonian
509: one has to be satisfied $4 k_F=G$ condition but this condition is not fulfilled for these
510: plateaus. The integrand of this sine-Gordon coupling terms contain an
511: oscillatory factor that leads to a vanishing contribution. The other criteria is
512: that non vanishing sine-Gordon coupling term should be relevant.
513: This incident is same for both $J_2$ and $J_1$ dimerized chain.
514:
515: \section{ 3. Discussions and conclusions:}
516: We have presented the generic feature of dimerized spin chain with NN and NNN exchange
517: interaction under a magnetic field. Different quantized magnetization
518: plateaus have occurred. The occurrence of $m=0$ magnetization plateau of NN exchange is spontaneous
519: , whereas for NNN exchange interaction is not spontaneous.
520: We have also predicted a phase transition line, which separate gapless spin-fluid phase to
521: gapped dimer order state as a function of $\frac{J_2}{J_1}$ and $\Delta$. We expect that this
522: critical line is the same for $J_1$ and $J_2$ dimerization, if one only consider the dimerized
523: phase from intrinsic umklapp term. We also retrieve the result of Cross and Fisher \cite{cross}
524: in one special limit
525: of our general consideration. The basic origin of $m=\frac{1}{4}$ magnetization
526: plateaus are the same for $J_1$ and $J_2$
527: dimerization because a critical strength of dimerization is needed to promote the state into
528: a plateau phase.
529: A critical strength of dimerized potential is necessary
530: for the occurrence of this plateau in presence of NNN interaction. One
531: can expect the Kosterlitz-Thouless type of transition for the occurrence of this
532: plateau. This Kosterlitz-Thouless transition has
533: been supported by the works of Totsuka \cite{tot}
534: and Tonegawa \cite{tone}.
535: Magnetization plateau at $m=\frac{1}{2}$ is the classical state of the system under high magnetic
536: field. Cabra {\it et al.} \cite{cab} have
537: predicted the $m=\frac{1}{2}$ magnetization plateau for zig-zag ladder
538: with different leg dimerization than our present problem. This plateau is the quantum phase
539: of the system.
540: We have explained the absence of other fractionally
541: quantized magnetization plateaus for our present problem.
542: Magnetic field dependence response for a zig-zag ladder with modulation in exchange
543: coupling have already studied by different groups numerically and they predict the
544: existence of non zero magnetization plateau \cite{umi}.
545: A higher order commensurabilities have occured for nonzero magnetization plateaus. This transition
546: from commensurate gapped phase to gapless Luttinger liquid phase is the Mott-$\delta$ type of
547: transition.\\
548:
549: Author would like to acknowledge Prof. T. Giamarchi for several extensive discussions during
550: the progress of this work and also Prof. B. I. Halperin, Prof. Dr. A. Honecker, and Prof. Diptiman Sen for partial
551: discussion. Dr. Abhishek Dhar and Dr. Nandan Pakhira are deserving acknowledgement for reading the
552: manuscript very critically.
553: Finally author would like to acknowledge
554: Prof. A. M. Finkelstein and Dr. Yuval Oreg for many useful discussions
555: on low dimensional many body systems and also for warm support.
556:
557:
558:
559:
560: \section{Appendix}
561:
562: In this appendix we present the explicit bosonization derivation
563: for $m=0$ plateau
564: of $J_2$ dimerization. Our starting Hamiltonian is
565: \beq
566: H_{2\delta} = - J_2 ~\delta ~\sum_{n}~ (-1)^n ~\vec{S}_n \cdot \vec{S}_{n+2} ~.
567: \eeq
568: After Jordan-Wigner transformation ( Eq.\ref{jor}), Hamiltonian reduce to
569: \bea
570: H_{2\delta} &=& - J_2 \delta \sum_n (-1)^n (\psi_{n+2}^{\dagger}
571: \psi_n + {\rm h.c.}) (\psi_{n+1}^{\dagger} \psi_{n+1} - 1/2) \nonum \\
572: && - J_2 \delta \sum_n (-1)^n (\psi_n^{\dagger} \psi_n - 1/2)
573: (\psi_{n+2}^{\dagger} \psi_{n+2} - 1/2) . \nonum \\
574: &&
575: \label{h2dfer}
576: \eea
577: We linearize the energy spectrum around the Fermi points $k_F~=\pm \frac{\pi}{2}$, and get
578: the Hamiltonian in a final form
579: \bea
580: H_{2 \delta} &=& - J_2 \delta a^2 ~\sum_n ~ (-1)^n [ - ~(\rho_{n+1} -(-1)^n M_{n+1}) \times \nonum \\
581: && ~~~~~~~~ (\rho_n + \rho_{n+2} + (-1)^n M_n + (-1)^n M_{n+2}) \nonum \\
582: && + (\rho_n + (-1)^n M_{n}) ({\rho}_{n+2} + ~(-1)^n M_{n+2})].
583: \eea
584:
585: During this derivation of $H_{2 \delta}$, we have used the following relations.
586: \bea
587: \rho (x) &=& ~-~ \frac{1}{\sqrt \pi} ~\partial_x \phi (x) ~, \nonum \\
588: M(x) &=& ~\frac{1}{\pi a} ~\cos (2 \phi (x)) ~.
589: \label{basic2}
590: \eea
591: Also,
592: we have used Taylor expressions such as
593: \beq
594: (R/L)(n+2) ~=~ (R/L)(n) ~+~ 2a(R'/L')(n) ~+~ 2a^2 (R''/L'')(n) ~+~ \cdots
595: \eeq
596: to write
597: \bea
598: && {(R/L)}^{\dagger}(n+2) {(R/L)}(n) ~+~ {(R/L)}^{\dagger}(n) {(R/L)}(n+2) \nonum \\
599: && = {(R/L)}^{\dagger}(n+2) {(R/L)}(n+2) ~ +~ {(R/L)}^{\dagger}(n) {(R/L)}(n) + O(a^2) ~.
600: \eea
601: Where $R$ and $L$ are second quantized field of right and left moving fermions respectively.
602: The non-oscillatory contributions of the Hamiltonian for XY and Z component of
603: interaction are
604: \beq
605: H_{2\delta} (XY) = J_2 \delta a^2 \sum_n ~
606: [\rho_{n+1} (M_n + M_{n+2}) - M_{n+1} (\rho_n + \rho_{n+2})].
607: \label{h2dbos}
608: \eeq
609: \beq
610: H_{2\delta} (Z) = - J_2 \delta a^2 \sum_n ~[\rho_n M_{n+2} + M_n \rho_{n+2}].
611: \label{h2dbos}
612: \eeq
613: Now we perform an operator product expansion of the above Hamiltonian. In the
614: limit $z \rightarrow w$, we can use the following expansion \cite{nag},
615: \bea
616: \partial_z \phi (z) :e^{i \beta \phi (w)}: &=& - \frac{i\beta}{z-w} :e^{i
617: \beta \phi (w)}: \nonum \\
618: && + : \partial_z \phi (z) e^{i \beta \phi (z)}: ~
619: \label{ope}
620: \eea
621: For our case $\beta~=2$ and $K$ varies from less than $1/2$ to greater than
622: $1/2$ depending on $\Delta$ and $\frac{J_2}{J_1}$ ratio. Here the values of
623: $K$ are irrelevant because
624: the various relevant terms in $H_{2\delta}(XY)$
625: and $H_{2\delta} (Z)$ cancel each other due to the denominator, $z~-~w$
626: , which takes values $\pm a$, $\pm 2a$.
627:
628: Apart from this detail mathematical analysis one can also understand the absence
629: of this term from the following consideration: Here the applied dimerized potential
630: is staggered. The sine-Gordon coupling term due to this perturbation
631: is
632: $$\frac{J_2 \delta}{2 {\pi}^2 {\alpha}^2}
633: \int dx :cos[(\pi- 4 k_F)x~+~4 \sqrt{K}~\phi (x) ~-~4 k_F a]:.$$
634: So at $k_F~=~\frac{\pi}{2}$ contribute a oscillatory term in the integrand and it
635: leads to the vanishing contribution.
636:
637:
638: \begin{references}
639: \bibitem{hal} F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 50}, 1153 (1983) and
640: Phys. Lett. A {\bf 93}, 464 (1983); I. Affleck, in {\it Fields, Strings
641: and Critical Phenomena}, ed. E. Brezin and J. Zinn-Justin (North-Holland,
642: Amsterdam, 1989).
643:
644: \bibitem{bed} J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Muller, Z. Phys. B {\bf 64}, 188
645: (1986).
646:
647: \bibitem{joh} D. C. Johnston, J. W. Johnson, D. P. Goshorn and A. J. Jacobson,
648: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 35}, 219 (1987); Z. Hiroi, M. Azuma, M. Takano and Y. Bando,
649: J. Solid State Chem. {\bf 95}, 230 (1991).
650:
651: \bibitem{chit} R. Chitra and T. Giamarchi, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, 5816 (1997).
652:
653: \bibitem{oshi} M. Oshikawa, M. Yamanka, and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Letters {\bf 78}, 1984 (1997).
654:
655: \bibitem{tot} K. Totsuka, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57}, 3453 (1998);
656: K. Totsuka, Phys. Letters. A {\bf 228}, 103 (1997).
657:
658: \bibitem{shi} W. Shiramura, K. Takatsu, H. Tanaka, K. Kamishima, M. Takahashi,
659: H. Mitamura, and T. Goto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 66}, 1900 (1997);
660: W. Shiramura, K. Takatsu, B. Kurniawan, H. tanaka, H. Uekusa, Y. Ohashi, K. Takizawa
661: H. Mitamura, and T. Goto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 67}, 1548 (1998);
662: T. Tonegawa, T. Nakao, and M. Kaburagi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 65}, 3317 (1996).
663:
664: \bibitem{tone} T. Tonegawa, T. Nishida, and M. Kaburagi, cond-mat/9712297.
665:
666: \bibitem{kole} H. J. Mikeska, and A. K. Kolezhuk in {\it Quantum Magnetism},
667: edited by U. Schollwock, J. Richter, D. J. J. Fernell, R. F. Bishop,
668: Lecture Notes in Physics 645 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2004).
669:
670: \bibitem{cab} D. C. Cabra, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol, Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 13}, 55 (2000);
671: D. C. Cabra, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58},
672: 6241 (1998); A. Honecker, Habil Thesis (private communication).
673:
674: \bibitem{mutt} A. Fledderjohann, C. Gerhardt, M. Karbach, K. H. Mutter, and R. wie${\beta}$ner,
675: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 59} 991 (1999);
676: R. wie${\beta}$ner, A. Fledderjohann, K. H. Mutter, and M. Karbach
677: Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 15}, 475 (2000).
678:
679: \bibitem{oku} K. Okunishi, Y. Hieida, and Y. Akutsu, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 60} R6953 (1999);
680: A. Kawaguchi , Y. Fujii, and N. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 63} 144413 (2001);
681: T. Yamamoto, R. Manago, Y. Mori, and C. Ishii, cond-mat/0204588.
682:
683: \bibitem{sato} R. Sato, and Y. Akatsu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 65}, 1885 (1996).
684:
685: \bibitem{dag} E. Dagotto, J. Riera and D. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 45},
686: 5744 (1992); E. Dagotto and T. M. Rice, Science {\bf 271}, 618 (1996).
687:
688: \bibitem{cha} G. Chaboussant, M.-H. Julien, Y. Fagot-Revurat, L. P. Levy,
689: C. Berthier, M. Horvatic, and O. Piovesana, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79},
690: 925 (1997).
691:
692: \bibitem{egg} S. Eggert, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, R9612 (1996);
693: K. Okamoto and K. Nomura, Phys. lett. A {\bf 169}, 433 (1992);
694: R. Jullien and F. D. M. Haldane, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. {\bf 28}, 344 (1983);
695: S. R. White and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 9862 (1996).
696:
697: \bibitem{jap} G. I. Japaridze, and A. A. Nersesyan, JETP Lett {\bf 27}, 334 (1978).
698:
699: \bibitem{pok} V. L. Pokrovsky, and A. L. Talapov, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 42}, 65 (1979).
700:
701: \bibitem{park} J. B. Parkinson, J. Phys. Condens. Matter {\bf 1}, 6709 (1989).
702:
703: \bibitem{sar1} S. Sarkar and D. Sen, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 172408 (2002).
704:
705: \bibitem{gia2} T. Giamarchi, {\it Quantum Physics in One Dimension} (Oxford Science Publications,
706: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004).
707:
708: \bibitem{gog} A. O. Gogolin, A. A. Nersesyan, and A. M. Tsvelik, {\it
709: Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems} (Cambridge University Press,
710: Cambridge, 1998).
711:
712: \bibitem{sumo} S. Rao and D. Sen in, {\it Field Theory in Condensed Matter Physics}, edited by
713: S. Rao (Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2003); D. Senechal, cond-mat/9908262.
714:
715: \bibitem{hal2} F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 25}, 4925 (1982); 26, 5257 (E) (1982).
716:
717: \bibitem{chen} S. Chen, H. B\"uttner, and J. Voit, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87},
718: 087205 (2001); ibid {\bf 89}, 149702 (2002); Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 054412 (20013).
719:
720: \bibitem{cap} L. Capriotti, F. Becca, S. Sorella, and A. Parola,
721: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67} 172404 (2003); Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89} 149701 (2002).
722:
723: \bibitem{maj} C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. {\bf 10},
724: 1388 and 1399 (1969).
725:
726: \bibitem{pati} R. Chitra, S.Pati,
727: H. R. Krishnamurthy, D. Sen, and S. Ramsesha, Phys. Rev. B, {\bf 52}, 6581 (1995).
728:
729: \bibitem{cross} M. C. Cross and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 19}, 402 (1979).
730:
731: \bibitem{kos} J. M. Kosterlitz, and D. M. Thouless, J. Phys. C {\bf 6}, 1181 (1973);
732: V. L. Berezinski, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 32}, 493 (1971).
733:
734: \bibitem{sub} Subir Sachdev, {\it Quantum Phase Transition} (Cambridge University Press,
735: Cambridge, 1998).
736:
737: \bibitem{suj2} S. Sarkar, Europhys. Lett {\bf 71}, 980 (2005).
738:
739: \bibitem{umi} M. Usami, and S. Suga, Phys. Lett. A {\bf 240}, 85 (1998) and
740: references therein.
741:
742: \bibitem{nag} N. Nagaosa, {\it Quantum Field Theory in Strongly Correlated
743: Electronic Systems} (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999); C. J. Efthimiou and
744: D. A. Spector, hep-th/0003190.
745:
746: \end{references}
747:
748: \end{document}
749: \begin{references}
750: \bibitem{hal} F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 50}, 1153 (1983) and
751: Phys. Lett. A {\bf 93}, 464 (1983); I. Affleck, in {\it Fields, Strings
752: and Critical Phenomena}, ed. E. Brezin and J. Zinn-Justin (North-Holland,
753: Amsterdam, 1989).
754:
755: \bibitem{bed} J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Muller, Z. Phys. B {\bf 64}, 188
756: (1986).
757:
758: \bibitem{joh} D. C. Johnston, J. W. Johnson, D. P. Goshorn and A. J. Jacobson,
759: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 35}, 219 (1987); Z. Hiroi, M. Azuma, M. Takano and Y. Bando,
760: J. Solid State Chem. {\bf 95}, 230 (1991).
761:
762: \bibitem{chit} R. Chitra and T. Giamarchi, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 55}, 5816 (1997).
763:
764: \bibitem{oshi} M. Oshikawa, M. Yamanka, and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Letters {\bf 78}, 1984 (1997).
765:
766: \bibitem{tot} K. Totsuka, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57}, 3453 (1998);
767: K. Totsuka, Phys. Letters. A {\bf 228}, 103 (1997).
768:
769: \bibitem{shi} W. Shiramura, K. Takatsu, H. tanaka, K. Kamishima, M. Takahashi,
770: H. Mitamura, and T. Goto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 66}, 1900 (1997);
771: W. Shiramura, K. Takatsu, B. Kurniawan, H. tanaka, H. Uekusa, Y. Ohashi, K. Takizawa
772: H. Mitamura, and T. Goto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 67}, 1548 (1998);
773: T. Tonegawa, T. Nakao, and M. Kaburagi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 65}, 3317 (1996).
774:
775: \bibitem{tone} T. Tonegawa, T. Nishida, and M. Kaburagi, cond-mat/9712297.
776:
777: \bibitem{kole} H. J. Mikeska, and A. K. Kolezhuk in {\it Quantum Magnetism},
778: edited by U. Schollwock, J. Richter, D. J. J. Fernell, R. F. Bishop,
779: Lecture Notes in Physics 645 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2004).
780:
781: \bibitem{cab} D. C. Cabra, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol, Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 13}, 55 (2000);
782: D. C. Cabra, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58},
783: 6241 (1998); A. Honecker, Habil Thesis (private communication).
784:
785: \bibitem{mutt} A. Fledderjohann, C. Gerhardt, M. Karbach, K. H. Mutter, and R. wie${\beta}$ner,
786: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 59} 991 (1999);
787: R. wie${\beta}$ner, A. Fledderjohann, K. H. Mutter, and M. Karbach
788: Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 15}, 475 (2000).
789:
790: \bibitem{oku} K. Okunishi, Y. Hieida, and Y. Akutsu, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 60} R6953 (1999);
791: A. Kawaguchi , Y. Fujii, and N. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 63} 144413 (2001);
792: T. Yamamoto, R. Manago, Y. Mori, and C. Ishii, cond-mat/0204588.
793:
794: \bibitem{sato} R. Sato, and Y. Akatsu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 65}, 1885 (1996).
795:
796: \bibitem{dag} E. Dagotto, J. Riera and D. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 45},
797: 5744 (1992); E. Dagotto and T. M. Rice, Science {\bf 271}, 618 (1996).
798:
799: \bibitem{cha} G. Chaboussant, M.-H. Julien, Y. Fagot-Revurat, L. P. Levy,
800: C. Berthier, M. Horvatic, and O. Piovesana, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79},
801: 925 (1997).
802:
803: \bibitem{egg} S. Eggert, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, R9612 (1996);
804: K. Okamoto and K. Nomura, Phys. lett. A {\bf 169}, 433 (1992);
805: R. Jullien and F. D. M. Haldane, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. {\bf 28}, 344 (1983);
806: S. R. White and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 9862 (1996).
807:
808: \bibitem{sud} G. Castilla, S. Chakravarty, and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75},
809: 1823 (1995).
810:
811: \bibitem{pei} G. S. Uhrig, Physica B {\bf 280}, 308 (2000);
812: J. P. Boucher and L. P. Regnault, J. Phys. I (France) {\bf 6}, 1939 (1996);
813: J. Riera and A. Dobry, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 51}, 16098 (1995).
814:
815: \bibitem{cross} M. C. Cross and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 19}, 402 (1979).
816:
817: \bibitem{pau} J. P. Pouget, Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 20}, 321(2001);
818: Eur. Phys. J. B {\bf 24}, 415 (2001).
819:
820: \bibitem{cit} R. Citro, E. Orignac, and T. Giamarchi, cond-mat/0411256.
821:
822: \bibitem{naka} T. Nakamura and K. Kubo, Phys. Rev. {\bf B 53}, 6393 (1996);
823: D. Sen, B. S. Shastry, R. E. Walstedt, and R. Cava, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 53},
824: 6401 (1996).
825:
826: \bibitem{maj} C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. {\bf 10},
827: 1388 and 1399 (1969).
828:
829: \bibitem{chen} S. Chen, H. B\"uttner, and J. Voit, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87},
830: 087205 (2001); ibid {\bf 89}, 149702 (2002); Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 054412 (20013).
831:
832: \bibitem{sar1} S. Sarkar and D. Sen, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 172408 (2002).
833:
834: \bibitem{cap} Capriotti. L, Becca. F, Sorella. S, and Parola. A,
835: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67} 172404 (2003); Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 89} 149701 (2002).
836:
837: \bibitem{jap} G. I. Japaridze, and A. A. Nersesyan, JETP Lett {\bf 27}, 334 (1978).
838:
839: \bibitem{pok} V. L. Pokrovsky, and A. L. Talapov, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 42}, 65 (1979).
840:
841: \bibitem{park} J. B. Parkinson, J. Phys. Condens. Matter {\bf 1}, 6709 (1989).
842:
843: \bibitem{gia2} T. Giamarchi, {\it Quantum Physics in One Dimension} (Oxford Science Publications,
844: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004).
845:
846: \bibitem{gog} A. O. Gogolin, A. A. Nersesyan, and A. M. Tsvelik, {\it
847: Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems} (Cambridge University Press,
848: Cambridge, 1998).
849:
850: \bibitem{sumo} S. Rao and D. Sen in, {\it Field Theory in Condensed Matter Physics}, edited by
851: S. Rao (Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2003); D. Senechal, cond-mat/9908262.
852:
853: \bibitem{hal2} F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 25}, 4925 (1982); 26, 5257 (E) (1982).
854:
855: \bibitem{fuku} K. Kuboki and H. Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn {\bf 56}, 312 (1987).
856:
857: \bibitem{kos} J. M. Kosterlitz, and D. M. Thouless, J. Phys. C {\bf 6}, 1181 (1973);
858: V. L. Berezinski, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 32}, 493 (1971).
859:
860: \bibitem{sub} Subir Sachdev, {\it Quantum Phase Transition} (Cambridge University Press,
861: Cambridge, 1998).
862:
863: \bibitem{raja} R. Rajaraman,{\it Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Soliton
864: and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory} (Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam).
865:
866: \bibitem{aug} D. Augier, D. Poilblanc, E. Sorensen, and I. Affleck,
867: Phys. Rev. B {\bf 58}, 9110 (1999).
868:
869: \bibitem{umi} M. Usami, and S. Suga, Phys. Lett. A {\bf 240}, 85 (1998) and
870: references therein.
871:
872:
873: