1: %
2: % Typeset using RevTeX 4
3: %
4: % Please address all correspondence to:
5: %
6: % C.C. Homes, Rm. 1-17
7: % Condensed Matter Physics & Materials Science Department - Bldg. 510B
8: % Brookhaven National Laboratory
9: % P.O. Box 5000
10: % Upton, NY 11973-5000
11: %
12: % Tel: (631) 344-7579
13: % FAX: (631) 344-2739
14: % Email: homes@bnl.gov
15: %
16: % Last edited by CCH on March 24, 2006.
17: % Last edited by JMT on March 27, 2006.
18: %
19: % manuscript: document class
20: %
21: %\documentclass[prb,showpacs,floatfix,preprint,byrevtex]{revtex4}
22: %\documentclass[prb,showpacs,floatfix,preprint,superscriptaddress,byrevtex]{revtex4}
23: %
24: % eprint: document class
25: %
26: %
27: \documentclass[prl,showpacs,floatfix,twocolumn,byrevtex]{revtex4}
28: %\documentclass[prb,showpacs,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,byrevtex]{revtex4}
29: %
30: \usepackage{dcolumn}
31: \usepackage{graphicx}
32: %\usepackage{float}
33: %\usepackage{longtable}
34: %
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
38: %\bibliographystyle{prsty}
39:
40: \preprint{Draft version 3, not for distribution}
41: %
42: % The title and the list of authors
43: %
44: \title{Charge order, metallic behavior and superconductivity in
45: %\title{Evidence of an anisotropic charge-excitation gap in stripe-ordered
46: \boldmath La$_{2-x}$Ba$_x$CuO$_4$ with $x=1/8$ \unboldmath}
47:
48: \author{C. C. Homes}
49: \email{homes@bnl.gov}
50: \author{S. V. Dordevic}
51: \altaffiliation{Department of Physics, The University of Akron, Akron, OH
52: 44325}
53: \author{G. D. Gu}
54: \author{Q. Li}
55: \author{T. Valla}
56: \author{J. M. Tranquada}
57: \affiliation{Condensed Matter Physics \& Materials Science Department,
58: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973}%
59: %
60: \date{\today}
61:
62: %
63: % The abstract goes here
64: %
65: \begin{abstract}
66: The {\it ab}-plane optical properties of a cleaved single crystal of
67: La$_{2-x}$Ba$_x$CuO$_4$ for $x=1/8$ ($T_c \simeq 2.4$~K) have been
68: measured over a wide frequency and temperature range. The low-frequency
69: conductivity is Drude-like and shows a metallic response with decreasing
70: temperature. However, below $\simeq 60$~K, corresponding to the onset of
71: charge-stripe order, there is a rapid loss of spectral weight below about
72: 40~meV. The gapping of single-particle excitations looks
73: surprisingly similar to that observed in superconducting
74: La$_{2-x}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_4$, including the presence of a residual Drude
75: peak with reduced weight; the main difference is that the lost spectral
76: weight moves to high, rather than zero, frequency, reflecting the absence
77: of a bulk superconducting condensate.
78:
79: %, resulting in a major reduction in the number of free carriers.
80: %This suggests a partial gapping of the Fermi surface. Surprisingly, the
81: %sample is still metallic and becomes a superconductor at low temperature.
82: %This is a striking example of how charge and spin stripe order, metallic
83: %behavior and superconductivity can exist in the same material.
84: \end{abstract}
85: %
86: % PACS numbers
87: % 63.20.-e Phonons in crystal lattices
88: % 72.15.Lh Relaxation times and mean-free paths
89: % 74.25.Gz Optical properties
90: % 74.25.-q Normal and superconducting states
91: % 74.72.-h High-Tc compounds
92: % 74.72.Bk Y-based cuprates
93: % 77.22.Ch Permittivity (dielectric function)
94: % 78.30.-j Infrared and Raman spectra
95: %
96: \pacs{74.25.Gz, 74.72.-h, 78.30.-j}%
97: \maketitle
98:
99: %
100: % The main body of the text
101: %
102: % Introduction
103: %
104:
105: It has been proposed that charge inhomogeneity, especially in the form of
106: stripes, is a phenomenon intrinsic to doped antiferromagnets such as cuprate
107: superconductors \cite{kivelson03,zaan01,mach89,cast95,vojt99}. Static spin
108: and charge stripe order has been observed by diffraction in a couple of
109: cuprate compounds \cite{ichikawa00,fujita04,abba05}; however, it appears to
110: compete with superconductivity \cite{ichikawa00}. The electronic structure
111: of the stripe-ordered state remains to be clarified experimentally. This is
112: an important issue, as it bears on the question of whether dynamic stripes
113: might be compatible with superconductivity, and possibly even necessary for
114: the high transition temperatures \cite{arrigoni04}. Kivelson, Fradkin, and
115: Emery \cite{kivelson98} argued that straight, ordered stripes should develop
116: a charge-density-wave (CDW) order along the stripes, which would compete with
117: pairing correlations. Castellani {\it et al.} \cite{castellani00} have
118: suggested that such commensurate stripes should be insulating. Previous
119: investigations of stripe correlations using infrared reflectivity on
120: oriented, cut-and-polished crystals of La$_{1.88-y}$Nd$_y$Sr$_{0.12}$CuO$_4$
121: (LNSCO) \cite{tajima99,dumm02} and La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (LSCO)
122: \cite{dumm02,lucarelli03} have resulted in a certain amount of controversy
123: \cite{tajima03,lucarelli03b}.
124:
125: In this Letter we report on the {\it ab}-plane optical properties of a {\it
126: cleaved} single crystal of La$_{2-x}$Ba$_x$CuO$_4$ (LBCO) for $x=1/8$. The
127: same crystal was used in a recent soft-X-ray resonant-diffraction study that
128: demonstrated charge order below 60~K \cite{abba05}. Working with a cleaved
129: surface greatly reduces the possibility of inadvertent surface misorientation
130: that can result in spurious effects \cite{tajima03}. The optical conductivity
131: initially shows a normal (for the cuprates) metallic response with
132: decreasing temperature. Below $\simeq 60$~K, the conductivity at very low
133: frequency appears to either remain roughly constant or increase slightly
134: as the temperature is reduced; however, there is a general loss of
135: spectral weight (the area under the conductivity curve) below $\simeq
136: 300$~cm$^{-1}$, a consequence of the substantial reduction in the density
137: of carriers. The missing spectral weight is redistributed to higher
138: frequencies, and is fully recovered only above about 2000~cm$^{-1}$.
139: Coinciding with the depression of the carrier density, the transition to
140: superconductivity is depressed to 2.4~K. The gapping of the
141: single-particle excitations looks remarkably similar to that recently
142: reported for superconducting La$_{1.85}$Sr$_{0.15}$CuO$_4$
143: \cite{tajima05}, which is known to have a $d$-wave gap \cite{yosh03}. The
144: presence of a residual Drude peak indicates that charge order is
145: compatible with a ``nodal metal'' state \cite{lee05}.
146:
147: % The reduction of the carrier
148: %concentration suggests a partial or anisotropic gapping of states at the
149: %Fermi level, consistent with the predicted CDW gap within the charge
150: %stripes \cite{kivelson98} and also compatible, surprisingly, with a
151: %``nodal metal'' state \cite{lee05}.
152:
153: %
154: % Experiment
155: %
156: Single crystals of La$_{2-x}$Ba$_x$CuO$_4$ with $x=1/8$ were grown by the
157: floating zone method. The sample used in this study had a strongly suppressed
158: bulk $T_c \simeq 2.4$~K as determined by magnetic susceptibility. The sample
159: was cleaved in air, yielding a mirror-like {\it ab}-plane face. The {\it
160: ab}-plane reflectance has been measured at a near-normal angle of incidence
161: over a wide temperature and spectral range using an {\it in-situ} evaporation
162: technique \cite{homes93}. The optical properties are calculated from a
163: Kramers-Kronig analysis of the reflectance, where extrapolations are supplied
164: for $\omega \rightarrow 0, \infty$. At low frequency, a metallic Hagen-Rubens
165: response is assumed $(R \propto 1-\omega^{1/2})$. Above the highest-measured
166: frequency in this experiment the reflectance of La$_{1.85}$Sr$_{0.15}$CuO$_4$
167: has been employed to about 40~eV \cite{uchida91}; above that frequency a
168: free-electron approximation has been assumed $(R\propto 1/\omega^4)$.
169:
170: %
171: % Results and discussion
172: %
173: The reflectance of La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ is shown from $\approx 20$
174: to 25,000~cm$^{-1}$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:reflec} for a variety of temperatures. The
175: reflectance is typical of many cuprates, with a plasma edge at $\approx 1$~eV
176: and a low-frequency reflectance that increases with decreasing temperature,
177: indicative of a metallic response. However, below $\approx 60$~K the
178: low-frequency reflectance in the $200 - 2000$~cm$^{-1}$ region stops increasing
179: and begins to decrease, as shown in more detail in the inset of
180: Fig.~\ref{fig:reflec}. Note that below $\approx 180$~cm$^{-1}$ the reflectance
181: continues to increase below 60~K. This suppression of the far-infrared
182: reflectance is unusual and has not been observed in other studies of LSCO or
183: LNSCO \cite{uchida91,gao93,startseva99,dumm02,lucarelli03, tajima05,padilla05}
184: for $T>T_c$.
185: %
186: % Note to John - I did all the FIR work in the paper by Zimmers, and we
187: % never saw the same behavior below 1000 cm-1 that we see here...
188: %
189: %
190: % Figure 1
191: %
192: \begin{figure}[t]%
193: %
194: % eprint, manuscript
195: %
196: \vspace*{-0.5cm}%
197: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.7in]{figure1.eps}}%
198: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4.6in]{figure1.eps}}%
199: \vspace*{-1.4cm}%
200: %
201: \caption{(Color online) The reflectance at a near-normal angle of
202: incidence for several temperatures over a wide spectral range for a
203: cleaved surface of La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ ($T_c \simeq 2.4$~K)
204: for light polarized in the {\it a-b} plane. The infrared reflectance
205: increases with decreasing temperature until about 60~K, below which it
206: is suppressed in the $200 - 2000$~cm$^{-1}$ region.
207: %
208: Inset: The detailed temperature dependence of the far-infrared
209: reflectance at and below 60~K. (The resolution is 2~cm$^{-1}$.)}
210: %
211: \vspace*{-0.3cm}%
212: \label{fig:reflec}
213: \end{figure}
214: %
215:
216: The optical conductivity is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:sigma}, with the
217: conductivity between 295 and 60~K in panel (a) and the behavior below 60~K in
218: (b). The conductivity can be described as a combination of a coherent
219: temperature-dependent Drude component, and an incoherent
220: temperature-independent component. The ``two-component'' expression for the
221: real part of the optical conductivity is
222: %
223: \begin{equation}
224: \sigma_1(\omega) = {1\over{60}}\, { {\omega_{p,D}^2 \Gamma_D} \over
225: {\omega^2+\Gamma_D^2} }+\sigma_{MIR},
226: % + {{\omega_{p,L}^2 \Gamma_L\omega^2} \over
227: % {(\omega_L^2 - \omega^2)^2 +\Gamma_L^2\omega^2} },
228: \end{equation}
229: %
230: where $\omega_{p,D}^2 = 4\pi n_D e^2/m^\ast$ is the square of the Drude plasma
231: frequency, $n_D$ is a carrier concentration associated with coherent transport,
232: $m^\ast$ is an effective mass, $\Gamma_D=1/\tau_D$ is the scattering rate, and
233: $\sigma_{MIR}$ is the mid-infrared component. (When $\omega_{pD}$ and
234: $1/\tau_D$ are in cm$^{-1}$, $\sigma_1$ has the units $\Omega^{-1}{\rm
235: cm}^{-1}$.) The conductivity in the mid-infrared is often described by a series
236: of overdamped Lorentzian oscillators which yield a flat, incoherent response in
237: this region. To simplify the fitting and reduce the number of parameters, a
238: constant background ($\sigma_{MIR}\sim850$ $\Omega^{-1}{\rm cm}^{-1}$) has been
239: used. The fitted Drude parameter values are summarized in
240: Table~\ref{tab:drude}.
241: %
242: % Figure 2: conductivity
243: %
244: \begin{figure}[t]%
245: %
246: % eprint, manuscript
247: %
248: \vspace*{-0.8cm}%
249: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.6in]{figure2.eps}}%
250: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4.6in]{figure2.eps}}%
251: \vspace*{-1.2cm}%
252: %
253: \caption{(Color online) The {\it ab}-plane optical conductivity of
254: La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ ($T_c \simeq 2.4$~K). (a) The conductivity in
255: the infrared region between 295 and 60~K, showing a steady narrowing of the
256: Drude-like component. The sharp features in the conductivity are the
257: normally-allowed infrared active vibrations; a feature at $\simeq
258: 125$~cm$^{-1}$ at 295~K is not visible at 60~K.
259: %
260: (b) The conductivity for several temperatures below 60~K. A new vibrational
261: feature appears at $\simeq 205$~cm$^{-1}$ below about 40~K.
262: %
263: Inset: The {\it ab}-plane resistivity of La$_{2-x}$Ba$_x$CuO$_4$ for $x
264: \simeq 1/8$ (solid curve) and in an 9~T magnetic field (dotted curve). The
265: open circles are the estimated values for the dc resistivity calculated from
266: the Drude parameters in Table~\ref{tab:drude}. }
267: %
268: \vspace*{-0.3cm}%
269: \label{fig:sigma}
270: \end{figure}
271: %
272:
273: Between room temperature and 60~K, the normalized Drude carrier density (last
274: column of Table~\ref{tab:drude}) remains constant, while the scattering rate
275: scales with the temperature ($\hbar/\tau \simeq 2k_BT$), similar to what has
276: been seen in the normal state of other metallic cuprates \cite{gao93,rome92}.
277: Below 60~K, a new and surprising behavior occurs: the carrier density
278: decreases rapidly, with a reduction of nearly 75\%\ at 5~K. We note that
279: this behavior is correlated with the onset of charge-stripe order as detected
280: by diffraction techniques \cite{fujita04,abba05}. The scattering rate also
281: continues to decrease as $n_D$ drops.
282:
283: It is interesting to compare with measurements of the in-plane resistivity,
284: $\rho_{ab}$, shown in the inset of Fig.~\ref{fig:sigma}(b), obtained on a
285: sister crystal. On cooling, the decrease in $\rho_{ab}$ is interrupted by a
286: slight jump at the structural transition, at about 54~K
287: \cite{fujita04,ichikawa00}. The drop in $\rho_{ab}$ below about 40~K is
288: likely due to filamentary superconductivity \cite{moodenbaugh88,ichikawa00},
289: as magnetic susceptibility measurements show that the bulk superconducting
290: transition is at 2.4 K. The non-bulk response can be suppressed through the
291: application of a magnetic field (9~T); the resulting curve shows a nearly
292: constant value for the resistivity below 54~K until the onset of bulk
293: superconductivity at low temperature. The Drude expression for the dc
294: resistivity, in units of $\Omega\,{\rm cm}$, is $\rho_{dc} =
295: 60/(\omega_{p,D}^2 \tau_D)$. The results obtained from the parameter values
296: in Table~\ref{tab:drude}, indicated by circles in the inset figure, are in
297: good agreement with the transport data. Thus, the flattening out of
298: $\rho_{ab}$ and slight upturn at low temperature corresponds to a decrease in
299: carrier density, and not to an increase in scattering rate.
300:
301: %
302: % Table I
303: %
304: \begin{table}[t]
305: \caption{Drude parameters from two-component fits to the low-frequency
306: {\it ab}-plane conductivity of La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$. The last
307: column relies on the assumption that $m^\ast$ is temperature independent.
308: }
309: \begin{ruledtabular}
310: \begin{tabular}[c]{cccc}%
311: %
312: T (K) & $\omega_{p,D}$ (cm$^{-1}$) & $1/\tau_D$ (cm$^{-1}$)
313: & $n_D(T)/n_D(60~{\rm K})$ \\%
314: \cline{1-4}
315: %
316: 295 & $7010\pm 120$ & $657\pm 35$ & $0.98\pm 0.12$ \\
317: 150 & $7070\pm 80$ & $223\pm 9$ & $0.99\pm 0.06$ \\
318: 60 & $7090\pm 50$ & $108\pm 2$ & $1.00\pm 0.06$ \\
319: 50 & $6560\pm 50$ & $89\pm 2$ & $0.85\pm 0.05$ \\
320: 40 & $5740\pm 40$ & $68\pm 2$ & $0.65\pm 0.04$ \\
321: 30 & $4930\pm 40$ & $43\pm 2$ & $0.48\pm 0.04$ \\
322: 5 & $3690\pm 50$ & $28\pm 2$ & $0.27\pm 0.04$ \\
323: %
324: \end{tabular}%
325: \end{ruledtabular}%
326: \label{tab:drude}%
327: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
328: \end{table}
329:
330: %
331: % Spectral weight
332: %
333: The optical conductivity lost from the Drude peak must shift to a different
334: frequency range. Where does the missing spectral weight go? To see this,
335: we consider the spectral weight, given by
336: %
337: \begin{equation}
338: N(\omega_c, T) = \int_{0^+}^{\omega_c} \sigma_1(\omega, T)\, d\omega .
339: \end{equation}
340: %
341: as a function of the cut-off frequency, $\omega_c$. If $\omega_c$ is large
342: enough to cover all relevant transitions, then $N(\omega_c)$ should be
343: proportional to the carrier density and independent of the scattering rate;
344: this is known as the $f$-sum rule. Figure~\ref{fig:weight} shows $N(\omega)$
345: for several temperatures above and below 60~K; the inset shows the
346: temperature dependence of $N(\omega_c)$ for three different values of
347: $\omega_c$. As the temperature decreases from 295~K down to 60~K,
348: there is an increase in the low-frequency spectral weight, consistent with
349: results for La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ \cite{orto05}. On cooling below 60~K,
350: the spectral weight below 100~cm$^{-1}$ continues to increase \cite{sumrule};
351: however, the net spectral weight up to 300 cm$^{-1}$ shows a substantial
352: decrease. The missing spectral weight is finally recovered for $\omega_c
353: \sim 2000$~cm$^{-1}$, above which $N(\omega)$ is temperature independent.
354: Similar behavior of the spectral weight has been observed in an
355: electron-doped cuprate system \cite{zimmers05}. The loss of spectral weight
356: below 60~K suggests a gapping of states near the Fermi level, while the
357: continued presence of a Drude component indicates that some states are not
358: gapped. From these results we infer the presence of an anisotropic charge
359: excitation gap in the stripe-ordered phase.
360:
361: %
362: % Figure 3: spectral weight
363: %
364: \begin{figure}[t]%
365: %
366: % eprint, manuscript
367: %
368: \vspace*{-0.5cm}%
369: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.7in]{figure3.eps}}%
370: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4.6in]{figure3.eps}}%
371: \vspace*{-1.4cm}%
372: %
373: % manuscript
374: %
375: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=3.8in]{figure4.eps}}%
376: %\vspace*{-1.2cm}%
377: %
378: \caption{(Color online) The {\it ab}-plane spectral weight N$(\omega)$
379: of La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ for several different temperatures
380: above and below 60~K. To simplify the units, the conductivity has been
381: expressed in cm$^{-1}$. Inset: The temperature dependence of the
382: spectral weight for cut-off frequencies $\omega_c = 40$, 100 and
383: 300~cm$^{-1}$.}
384: %
385: \vspace*{-0.3cm}%
386: \label{fig:weight}
387: \end{figure}
388:
389: It has been predicted theoretically that CDW order should compete with
390: superconductivity within an ordered array of stripes \cite{kivelson98}.
391: If this were the case, then, as discussed by Zhou {\it et al.}\
392: \cite{zhou99}, one would expect the development of a CDW gap within the
393: stripes to occur in the ``antinodal'' regions of reciprocal space, where
394: the extrapolated Fermi surface has straight, well-nested portions. Note
395: that the antinodal states exhibit a pseudogap in the normal state
396: \cite{timusk99,yosh03}, so that development of a true CDW gap would only
397: affect states at finite binding energy.
398:
399: Alternatively, we find that the decrease in the low-frequency
400: conductivity at low temperature in the stripe-ordered state of
401: La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ looks surprisingly similar to that found in the
402: superconducting state of La$_{1.85}$Sr$_{0.15}$CuO$_4$ \cite{tajima05}, both in
403: terms of energy scale and magnitude. A residual Drude peak was also observed
404: in the latter superconductor. This similarity suggests an intimate connection
405: between the charge gap of the stripe-ordered state and the pairing gap of the
406: superconductor. Could the charge gap correspond to pairing
407: without phase coherence?
408:
409: In either case, the residual Drude peak indicates that states in the
410: ``nodal'' region are not strongly impacted by the charge gap, so that the
411: stripe-ordered state remains a nodal metal \cite{lee05}. We note that
412: the coexistence of metallic behavior and an anisotropic gap has been
413: observed in two-dimensional CDW systems
414: \cite{forro98,mcconnell98}. Such behavior is contrary to expectations of
415: a uniform gap for ordered stripes \cite{castellani00}.
416:
417: Before concluding, we should consider how our results compare with others in
418: the literature. The two-component behavior (temperature-dependent Drude peak
419: plus temperature-independent mid-infrared component) has been identified
420: previously in studies of several different cuprate families
421: \cite{rome92,gao93,lee05}. The loss of spectral weight in the stripe ordered
422: phase is a new observation. Measurements on
423: La$_{1.275}$Nd$_{0.6}$Sr$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ \cite{dumm02} seem to be consistent,
424: but a larger low-temperature scattering rate in that sample masks any
425: depression of the optical conductivity. In contrast, studies by Lucarelli
426: {\it et al.}~\cite{lucarelli03} on La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ and Ortolani {\it et
427: al.}~\cite{orto05b} on La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125-y}$Sr$_y$CuO$_4$ have found
428: strong, sharp peaks at finite frequency ($20-100$~cm$^{-1}$) in low-temperature
429: measurements. These ``far-infrared peaks'', which have not been observed by
430: other groups, have been interpreted as collective excitations of charge stripes
431: \cite{lucarelli03,orto05b,benf03}. Those results have been controversial, and
432: have motivated some discussion of possible spurious effects
433: \cite{tajima03,lucarelli03b,tajima05}. Here we simply note that our
434: measurements on a cleaved sample do not show any indications of far-infrared
435: peaks. Furthermore, the temperature-dependence of the conductivity and the
436: loss of the low-frequency spectral weight that we observe is directly
437: correlated with onset of stripe order as detected by diffraction
438: \cite{fujita04,abba05}; the behavior of the Drude peak is quantitatively
439: consistent with the measured resistivity.
440:
441: %
442: % Concluding remarks.
443: %
444: In summary, the {\it ab}-plane properties of a cleaved single crystal of
445: La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ have been examined over a wide frequency
446: range at several different temperatures. The rapid decrease of the
447: carrier concentration $n_D$ below the electronic transition at $\simeq
448: 60$~K suggests the development of an anisotropic charge gap associated
449: with the stripe order. Nodal excitations presumably remain ungapped; the
450: deviation from $\rho_{ab}\sim T$ at small $T$ is due to the decrease in
451: carrier density, not to a uniform increase in scattering rate. Thus it
452: appears that stripes are compatible with the nodal-metal state.
453:
454: %
455: % Acknowledgements
456: %
457: \begin{acknowledgments}
458: We would like to acknowledge useful discussions with D.~N.~Basov and
459: T.~Timusk, and helpful comments from S.~A.~Kivelson. This work was supported
460: by the Office of Science, U.S. Dept. of Energy, under contract number
461: DE-AC02-98CH10886.
462: \end{acknowledgments}
463:
464: %
465: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
466: %
467: % References
468: %
469: \bibliography{lbco}
470: %
471:
472: \end{document}
473:
474:
475:
476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
477: %
478: % Total number of doped carriers relative to the coherent component
479: %
480: The total number of doped carriers are estimated from the plasma frequency
481: $\omega_p$, while $\omega_{pd}$ represents only those carriers which
482: participate in coherent response. The value for $\omega_p$ may be estimated
483: using several different techniques. The finite-energy $f$-sum rule is
484: %
485: \begin{equation}
486: \int_0^{\omega_c} \sigma_1(\omega) d\omega \approx \omega_p^2/8,
487: \end{equation}
488: %
489: where $\omega_c$ is a cut-off frequency, and $\omega_p^2 = 4\pi ne^2/m$ is
490: the square of the classical plasma frequency \cite{smith}. In the absence of
491: other excitations, this sum rule is exact in the $\omega_c \rightarrow
492: \infty$ limit. While the $f$-sum rule may be employed, the uncertainty as to
493: where to truncate the integral results in values for $\omega_p$ which are
494: rather arbitrary.
495: %
496: Alternatively, the zero-crossing of the real part of the dielectric function
497: $\epsilon_1(\omega)$ occurs at $\omega_p/\sqrt{\epsilon_\infty}$. However, the
498: presence of interband absorptions that overlap with the coherent component, as
499: well as the difficulty in choosing the correct value of $\epsilon_\infty$,
500: makes this approach unreliable.
501: %
502: Reasonable estimates of $\omega_p$ for the cuprates have been obtained from
503: the absorption \cite{gervais02,hwang04}; linear fits to the high-frequency
504: region of the coherent component yield values of $\omega_p \approx 9000 -
505: 10\,500$~cm$^{-1}$. This suggests that only about half of the doped carriers
506: in this material are associated with the coherent Drude component (at room
507: temperature); this value is consistent with the behavior observed in other
508: doped cuprates \cite{tanner98}.
509:
510:
511:
512: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
513: %Superconductivity at elevated temperatures was originally observed in the
514: %La$_{2-x}$Ba$_x$CuO$_4$ (LBCO) material almost 20 years ago \cite{bednorz86},
515: %and has subsequently been observed in many other copper-oxide materials
516: %\cite{bednorz86}. However, in comparison with the closely related
517: %La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (LSCO) material, the LBCO material has remained
518: %relatively unexamined.
519: %
520: %For $x \lesssim 0.18$, LBCO is tetragonal at high temperature (HTT, $I4/mmm$),
521: %orthorhombic at intermediate temperatues (LTO, $Bmab$) and then finally
522: %tetragonal again at low temperatures (LTT, $P4_2/ncm$) \cite{axe89,billinge93},
523: %which is different than the LTO phase observed in LSCO.
524: %
525: %For the $x=1/8$ doping, there is an electronic transition at $T \simeq 60$~K
526: %which is evident in transport measurements \cite{moodenbaugh88,sera89}. This is
527: %also the temperature at which the LTO-LTT phase transition occurs. In
528: %addition, there is an anomalous suppression of the superconductivity for the
529: %$x=1/8$ doping \cite{moodenbaugh88}. It has been suggested that both the
530: %electronic transition and the suppression of the superconductivity are
531: %associated with the formation of static charge and spin stripe order
532: %\cite{fujita02, kivelson03,tranquada04,fujita04}, which is thought to be
533: %stabilized by the LTT distortion \cite{cordero01}. The role of charge and spin
534: %stripe order to either promote the formation of superconductivity
535: %\cite{kivelson98,arrigoni04}, or to act as a competing order parameter
536: %\cite{tranquada97,ichikawa00}, is currently a matter of considerable debate.
537: %
538: % Absence of optical studies
539: %
540: %Optical properties can reveal a tremendous amount of information about the
541: %electronic and vibrational properties of a material. Optical studies of the
542: %nickelate materials where static charge and spin stripe order has been observed
543: %\cite{wochner98} revealed charge gaps and insulating ground states
544: %\cite{katsufuji96,homes03}. The formation of charge and spin stripes and strong
545: %suppression of $T_c$ in $x=1/8$ doping in LBCO, coupled with the metallic
546: %nature of the ground state suggests that the optical properties of this system
547: %will be very revealing. In light of this, while the effects of static
548: %charge-stripe order on the optical properties of
549: %La$_{2-x-y}$Nd$_y$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ for $y=0.4, 0.6$ (LNSCO) have been examined
550: %\cite{tajima99,dumm02}, it is surprising that no work has been done on the
551: %optical properties of LBCO.
552: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
553: