1: \documentclass[twocolumn,aps,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{epsf,graphicx}%,showkeys}
3: \usepackage{supercite}
4: \usepackage{subfigure}
5: %
6: \def\Bf#1{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
7: %
8: \begin{document}
9: \title{Thermodynamical Properties of a Rotating Ideal Bose Gas}
10: %
11: \author{Sebastian Kling}
12: \email{kling@iap.uni-bonn.de}
13: \affiliation{%
14: Institut f{\"u}r Angewandte Physik, Universit{\"a}t Bonn, Wegelerstra{\ss}e 8,
15: 53115 Bonn, Germany}
16: \author{Axel Pelster}
17: \email{axel.pelster@uni-due.de}
18: \affiliation{%
19: Fachbereich Physik, Campus Duisburg,
20: Universit{\"a}t Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstrasse 1,
21: 47048 Duisburg, Germany}
22:
23: \date{\today}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26: In a recent experiment, a Bose-Einstein condensate was trapped in an anharmonic potential which is well
27: approximated by a harmonic and a quartic part.
28: The condensate was set into such a fast rotation that the centrifugal force in the corotating frame
29: overcompensates the harmonic part in the plane perpendicular to the rotation axis.
30: Thus, the resulting trap potential became Mexican-hat shaped.
31: We present an analysis for an ideal Bose gas which is confined in such an anharmonic rotating trap within
32: a semiclassical approximation where we calculate the critical temperature, the condensate fraction, and the
33: heat capacity.
34: In particular, we examine in detail how these thermodynamical quantities depend on the rotation frequency.
35: \end{abstract}
36: %
37: \pacs{03.75.Hh, 31.15.Gy, 51.30.+i}
38: %
39: \maketitle
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: %
42: \section{Introduction}
43: %
44: The rotation of a quantum fluid leads to many interesting problems. In particular, the rotation of ultracold
45: Bose gases has motivated a lot of scientific work within the last few years.\\
46: The rotation has the effect of adding an angular momentum to the system so that it
47: can be compared with the motion of a charged particle in a magnetic field.
48: Initial experiments \cite{Dali00,Ketterle01} have shown that, analogously to the superfluid
49: helium II \cite{Donelly}, vortices
50: nucleate at some critical rotation frequency.
51: The main difference between earlier studies about quantum fluids and BEC's is the trap in which the condensate is
52: confined.
53: This inspired A.L.~Fetter \cite{Fetter01} to suggest adding a quartic term to the harmonic trap potential.
54: His idea was to rotate the condensate so fast that the centrifugal force may overcompensate the harmonic trapping
55: potential.
56: In a harmonic trap, the condensate gets lost when the rotation frequency comes close to the harmonic trap
57: frequency \cite{Rosenbusch}, but the additional anharmonicity ensures the confining of the condensate.
58: Such a trap was realized in an experiment in Paris at the {\'E}cole Normale Sup{\'e}rieure (ENS) in the group of J.~Dalibard
59: in 2004 \cite{Bretin}. \\
60: The experimental setup was a usual magneto-optical trap with the frequencies $\omega_x=\omega_y=2\pi\times75.5$~Hz and $\omega_z=2\pi\times 11.0$~Hz.
61: The additional quartic anharmonicity was generated with a Gaussian laser beam propagating in $z$-direction which created
62: a potential $U= U_0\exp{(-2r_\bot^2/w^2)}$ with the perpendicular radius $r_\bot= \sqrt{x^2+y^2}$, the laser's waste
63: $w=25$~$\mu$m, and the intensity $U_0\sim(k_B\times90)$~nK.
64: Due to the experimentally realized condition $r_\bot<w/2$, this potential is well approximated by
65: $U=U_0-(2U_0/w^2)r_\bot^2+(2U_0/w^4)r_\bot^4$.
66: In Ref.~\cite{Bretin} an amount of $3\times 10^5$ atoms of ${}^{87}$Rb is set into rotation with another
67: laser beam acting as a stirrer.
68: The laser creates an anisotropic potential in the $xy$-plane which rotates with frequency $\Omega$.
69: In the corotating frame, the resulting trapping potential can be written as
70: %
71: \begin{equation}
72: \label{Vrot1}
73: V_{\rm rot}({\bf x},\Omega)=\frac{M}{2}\left(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2\right)r_\bot^2+\frac{M}{2}\omega_z^2z^2+\frac{k}{4}r_\bot^4\,,
74: \end{equation}
75: %
76: where $\omega_\bot=\omega_x-4U_0M^{-1}w^{-2}=2\pi\times64.8$ Hz and $M$ is the atomic mass.
77: The last term in (\ref{Vrot1}) corresponds to the quartic anharmonicity with $k=8U_0 w^{-4}=2.6\times10^{-11}$~Jm${}^{-4}$.\\
78: In the following we treat the Bose gas in the anharmonic trap (\ref{Vrot1}) within the grand-canonical ensemble
79: and determine the critical temperature, the condensate fraction, and the heat capacity of the Bose gas within a
80: semiclassical approximation.
81: In our discussion the rotation frequency $\Omega$ appears as a control parameter.
82: The Paris experiment \cite{Bretin} allows rotation frequencies $\Omega$ up to $1.04\times\omega_\bot$.
83: However, in the present theoretical discussion, we consider arbitrarily large rotation frequencies.
84: In Fig.~\ref{POT} we depict how the trapping potential (\ref{Vrot1}) varies with increasing rotation frequency $\Omega$.
85: For small rotation frequencies $\Omega<\omega_\bot$, the potential (\ref{Vrot1}) is convex, for the critical rotation frequency
86: $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ it is purely quartic in the perpendicular plane, and for a fast rotation frequency $\Omega>\omega_\bot$ the trap has the
87: shape of a Mexican hat.
88: In our discussion, we focus on two particular rotation frequencies, namely the critical rotation frequency $\Omega=\omega_\bot$
89: and the limit of an infinite fast rotation frequency $\Omega\to\infty$ as the potential reduces to power laws in both cases.
90: Such potentials were investigated some time ago as they lead to analytic formulas for the respective thermodynamical
91: properties \cite{Bagnato87,Yukalov}.
92: Note that the case $\Omega\to\infty$ corresponds to a trap where the bosons are confined to a cylinder of radius
93: $r_{\rm cyl}=\sqrt{M^2\omega_z(\Omega^2-\omega_\bot^2)/(k\hbar)}$.
94: Thus, the above mentioned experimental restriction $r_{\rm cyl}<w/2$ allows to determine a maximum rotation frequency
95: $\Omega_{\rm max}$ for which the anharmonic potential (\ref{Vrot1}) of the Paris experiment is valid.
96: The resulting value $\Omega_{\rm max}=1.08\times\omega_\bot$ shows that considering an infinite rotation frequency $\Omega\to\infty$ is not
97: suitable for this experiment.
98: %
99: \section{Ideal Bose Gas in rotating Trap}
100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
101: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
102: \begin{figure}[t]
103: \center\begin{minipage}[tb]{.4\textwidth}
104: \center\includegraphics[scale=.65]{Fig1.eps}
105: \put(-3.5,-.3){$x\left[\frac{\hbar}{M\omega_z}\right]$}
106: \put(-7,1){\rotatebox{90}{$V(x,0,0)\,\,\left[\hbar\omega_z\right]$}}
107: \put(-3.3,2.3){$\Omega_1$}
108: \put(-2,2){$\Omega_2$}
109: \put(-1.5,1.1){$\Omega_3$}
110: \renewcommand{\figurename}{FIG.}
111: \caption{Trapping potential (\ref{Vrot1}) in $(x,0,0)$-direction for the values of the Paris experiment \cite{Bretin}
112: and varying rotation frequencies $\Omega_1=0$, $\Omega_2=\omega_\bot$, $\Omega_3=1.04\times\omega_\bot$. The latter is the largest experimentally realized
113: rotation frequency.}
114: \label{POT}
115: \end{minipage}
116: \end{figure}
117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
118: We consider $N$ particles of an ideal Bose gas which are distributed over various quantum states $\nu$ of the system.
119: These states are characterized through the population $n_{\bf n}$ of the one-particle state ${\bf n}$ of the trap
120: (\ref{Vrot1}), such that the energy levels are $E_\nu = \sum_{\bf n}n_{\bf n}E_{\bf n}$, where $E_{\bf n}$ denotes the
121: one-particle energy.
122: Correspondingly, the number of particles in state $\nu$ are given by $N_\nu = \sum_{\bf n}n_{\bf n}$.
123: The resulting grand-canonical ensemble is determined by its partition function
124: %
125: \begin{equation}
126: \label{ZG1}
127: \mathcal{Z} = \sum_{\nu}\exp{\left[-\beta\left(E_\nu-\mu N_\nu\right)\right]}\,,
128: \end{equation}
129: %
130: where $\beta=1/(k_B T)$ denotes an inverse temperature, $k_B$ is Boltzmann's constant, and $\mu$ is the chemical potential.
131: The corresponding grand-canonical free energy $\mathcal{F} = -(1/ \beta)\ln{\mathcal{Z}}$ allows to calculate all relevant
132: thermodynamical quantities \cite{Pitaevskii,Pethick}.
133: Around the minimum, the trap (\ref{Vrot1}) has a small curvature so that the energy levels are close to each other.
134: With increasing rotation frequency, the curvature decreases until the critical rotation frequency $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ is reached.
135: Not until the rotation frequency overcompensates the harmonic part of the trap, the curvature increases again.
136: Thus, for all experimentally realized rotation frequencies $0\leq\Omega\leq1.04\times\omega_\bot$, our system can be
137: described by the discrete ground state $E_0$, which must be retained quantum-mechanically, plus a continuum of states
138: above $E_0$.
139: Within this semiclassical approximation, we can set the ground-state energy $E_0$ to zero so that the grand-canonical
140: free energy of the ideal Bose gas reads
141: %
142: \begin{eqnarray}
143: \label{FG1}
144: \mathcal{F}&=&N_0(\mu_c-\mu)\nonumber\\
145: &&\hspace{-8mm}-\sum_{j=1}^\infty\frac{1}{\beta j}\int\frac{d^3\!x\,d^3\!p}{(2\pi\hbar)^3}\,
146: \exp{\left\{ -\beta j\left[H({\bf x}, {\bf p})-\mu\right]\right\}}\,,
147: \end{eqnarray}
148: %
149: where the energy levels are replaced by the classical Hamiltonian
150: %
151: \begin{equation}
152: H({\bf x}, {\bf p})=\frac{{\bf p}^2}{2M} + V_{\rm rot}({\bf x}, \Omega)\,.
153: \end{equation}
154: %
155: The critical chemical potential $\mu_c$, where the condensation emerges, is determined by the condition
156: $H({\bf x},{\bf p})-\mu_c>0$ and is therefore given by $\mu_c=\min_{\bf x}{V_{\rm rot}({\bf x},\Omega)}$.
157: Due to (\ref{Vrot1}) it reads explicitly
158: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
159: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
160: \begin{figure}[t]
161: \center\begin{minipage}[tb]{.4\textwidth}
162: \center\includegraphics[scale=.65]{Fig2.eps}
163: \put(-4,-.3){$\Omega/ \omega_\bot$}
164: \put(-7,1.6){\rotatebox{90}{$T_c(\Omega)$ [nK]}}
165: \renewcommand{\figurename}{FIG.}
166: \caption[Critical temperature (anharmonic) versus rotation frequency.]{\small Critical temperature versus rotation
167: frequency $\Omega$. The highest lying line (solid) corresponds to the data of the Paris experiment \cite{Bretin}, see
168: data below Eq.~(\ref{Vrot1}). For the deeper lying lines we varied the anharmonicity parameter $k$: $k\to k/10$
169: (long dashes), $k\to k/100$ (short dashes), and the harmonic limit $k\downarrow0$ (gray solid).}
170: \label{PTc1}
171: \end{minipage}
172: \end{figure}
173: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
174: \begin{equation}
175: \label{Mu1}
176: \mu_c=\left\{\begin{array}{cl}
177: 0&;\,\Omega\leq\omega_\bot\,,\\[2mm]
178: -{\displaystyle \frac{M^2}{4k}\left(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2\right)^2}&;\,\Omega>\omega_\bot\,.
179: \end{array}\right.
180: \end{equation}
181: %
182: Performing the phase-space integral in (\ref{FG1}), we obtain
183: %
184: \begin{equation}
185: \label{FG2}
186: \mathcal{F}=N_0(\mu_c-\mu)-\frac{\zeta_4(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}{\beta^4\hbar^3\omega_z\left(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2\right)}\,,
187: \end{equation}
188: %
189: where we have introduced the generalized $\zeta$-function
190: %
191: \begin{eqnarray}
192: \label{Zeta1}
193: \zeta_\nu(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)&=&\sum_{j=1}^\infty\frac{e^{j\beta\mu}}{j^{\nu}}
194: \sqrt{j\pi \gamma_T}\left(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2\right)\nonumber\\
195: &&\hspace{-20mm}\times\exp{\left[ j \gamma_T \left(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2\right)^2\right]}
196: \mathrm{erfc}\left[\sqrt{j \gamma_T} \left(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2\right)\right]
197: \end{eqnarray}
198: %
199: with the complementary error function
200: %
201: \begin{equation}
202: \label{error}
203: \mathrm{erfc}(z)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_z^{\infty}\!\!dt\,e^{-t^2}\,.
204: \end{equation}
205: %
206: We have also shortened the notation with using $\gamma_T=M^2/(4kk_BT)$ as another inverse temperature.
207: We remark that in the limit of a vanishing anharmonicity $k\downarrow0$ with an undercritical rotation frequency $\Omega<\omega_\bot$ the
208: generalized $\zeta$-function (\ref{Zeta1}) reduces to the polylogarithmic function
209: %
210: \begin{equation}
211: \label{Zeta2}
212: \lim_{k\downarrow0 \atop \,\,\,\Omega<\omega_\bot}{\zeta_\nu(z,\Omega)}=\zeta_\nu(z)=\sum_{j=1}^\infty\frac{z^j}{j^{\nu}}\,,
213: \end{equation}
214: %
215: which is related to the Riemann $\zeta$-function via
216: %
217: \begin{equation}
218: \label{Zeta3}
219: \zeta_\nu(1) = \zeta(\nu)=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{j^\nu}\,.
220: \end{equation}
221: %
222: Furthermore, we note that in the limit of the critical rotation frequency $\Omega\to\omega_\bot$, the generalized $\zeta$-function
223: (\ref{Zeta1}) reads
224: %
225: \begin{equation}
226: \label{Zeta5}
227: \lim_{\Omega\to\omega_\bot}{\frac{\zeta_\nu(z,\Omega)}{\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2}} = \sqrt{\pi \gamma_T}\zeta_{\nu-1/2}(z)
228: \end{equation}
229: %
230: and in the limit of an infinite fast rotation it is approximated by
231: %
232: \begin{equation}
233: \label{Zeta6}
234: \frac{ \zeta_\nu(z,\Omega) }{ \omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2 } \approx 2\sqrt{\pi \gamma_T}\sum_{j=1}^\infty \frac{ z^j
235: e^{ j\gamma_T\left(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2\right)^2} }{ j^{\nu-1/2} }\,;\, \Omega\to\infty \,,
236: \end{equation}
237: %
238: \section{Condensate Density}
239: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
240: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
241: \begin{figure}[t]
242: \center\begin{minipage}[t]{.4\textwidth}
243: \center\includegraphics[scale=.65]{Fig3.eps}
244: \put(-7,1.7){\rotatebox{90}{\small $N_0/N$}}
245: \put(-4,-0.3){\small $T/T_c(\Omega)$}
246: \renewcommand{\figurename}{FIG.}
247: \caption{\small Condensate fraction versus reduced temperature. The solid line corresponds to the condensate
248: fraction (\ref{CF2}) of a Bose gas in the trap (\ref{Vrot1}) for the rotation frequency $\Omega=0$ and the parameters
249: of the Paris experiment \cite{Bretin}. The dashed line corresponds to the condensate fraction at the critical
250: $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ and at the infinite fast $\Omega\to\infty$ rotation frequency given by Eq.~(\ref{CF1}).}
251: \label{PCF1}
252: \end{minipage}
253: \end{figure}
254: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
255: From the grand-canonical free energy (\ref{FG2}) we read off that the number of particles
256: $N = -(\partial \mathcal{F}/ \partial\mu)_{T,V}$ of an ideal Bose gas is given by a sum of $N= N_0 +N_e$ of particles
257: in the ground state $N_0$ and particles in excited states $N_e$:
258: %
259: \begin{equation}
260: \label{N1}
261: N=N_0+\frac{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}{\beta^3\hbar^3\omega_z\left(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2\right)}\,.
262: \end{equation}
263: %
264: The critical temperature $T_c$ at which the condensation emerges can be found from Eq.~(\ref{N1}) by setting $N_0=0$
265: and $\mu=\mu_c$.
266: For undercritical rotation frequencies $\Omega<\omega_\bot$ and vanishing anharmonicity $k\downarrow0$, we apply (\ref{Zeta2}) so that the
267: critical temperature reads
268: %
269: \begin{equation}
270: \label{Tc0}
271: T_c=\frac{\hbar\omega_z}{k_B}\left[\frac{(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)N}{\omega_z^2\zeta(3)}\right]^{1/3}\,;\,\,k=0\,.
272: \end{equation}
273: %
274: For a non-vanishing anharmonicity $k$, the critical temperature can not be determined explicitly because it appears in
275: Eq.~(\ref{N1}) transcendentally.
276: However, there are two special cases in which we obtain an analytical expression for the critical temperature.
277: At first, for the critical rotation $\Omega=\omega_\bot$, we find with (\ref{Zeta5}) \cite{StockLP}:
278: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
279: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
280: \begin{figure}[t]
281: \center\begin{minipage}[t]{.4\textwidth}
282: \center\includegraphics[scale=.65]{Fig4.eps}
283: \put(-7,1.7){\rotatebox{90}{\small $N_0/N$}}
284: \put(-4,-0.3){\small $T/T_c(\Omega=0)$}
285: \renewcommand{\figurename}{FIG.}
286: \caption{\small Condensate fraction versus reduced temperature. The condensate fraction (\ref{CF2}) is evaluated for
287: various rotation frequencies $\Omega$, the solid line corresponds to $\Omega=0$ to which the temperature is normalized. The
288: other lines are for $\Omega=\omega_\bot/ \sqrt{2}$ (short dashes), $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ (longer dashes), and $\Omega=\sqrt{3/2}\times \omega_\bot$ (long dashes).}
289: \label{PCF2}
290: \end{minipage}
291: \end{figure}
292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
293: \begin{equation}
294: \label{Tc1}
295: T_c = \frac{\hbar\omega_z}{k_B}\left(\frac{4k\hbar}{\pi M^2\omega_z^3}\right)^{1/5} \left(\frac{N}{\zeta(5/2)}\right)^{2/5}\,.
296: \end{equation}
297: %
298: Secondly, the limit of an infinite fast rotation frequency $\Omega\to\infty$ leads with (\ref{Zeta6}) to the critical temperature
299: %
300: \begin{equation}
301: \label{Tc2}
302: T_c = \frac{\hbar\omega_z}{k_B}\left(\frac{k \hbar}{\pi M^2\omega_z^3}\right)^{1/5} \left(\frac{N}{\zeta(5/2)}\right)^{2/5}\,,
303: \end{equation}
304: %
305: which is by a factor $(1/4)^{1/5} \approx 0.76$ smaller than the previous one.
306: A numerical evaluation of the critical temperature obtained from (\ref{N1}) is shown in Fig.~\ref{PTc1} for the
307: values of the Paris experiment \cite{StockPhD}.
308: For the non-rotating trap, we see that the anharmonicity only slightly
309: affects the critical temperature.
310: With increasing rotation frequency $\Omega$, the critical temperature decreases and the difference
311: between the harmonic and the anharmonic trap is clearly seen.
312: At the critical rotation frequency $\Omega=\omega_\bot$, the critical temperature is $T_c=63.5$~nK which is about three times
313: smaller than the one estimated for the Paris experiment \cite{Bretin}. \\
314: From the number of particles (\ref{N1}), we also obtain the condensate fraction in the temperature regime $T<T_c$.
315: Here the chemical potential coincides with the critical one given by Eq.~(\ref{Mu1}).
316: For undercritical rotation frequencies $\Omega<\omega_\bot$ and vanishing anharmonicity $k\downarrow0$, we use (\ref{Zeta2}) so that the
317: condensate fraction is given by
318: %
319: \begin{equation}
320: \label{CF0}
321: \frac{N_0}{N}=1-\left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^{3}\,;\,k=0\,.
322: \end{equation}
323: %
324: Furthermore, applying (\ref{Zeta5}) and (\ref{Zeta6}) in the cases $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ and $\Omega\to\infty$,
325: respectively, yields with the critical chemical potential (\ref{Mu1}) the following condensate fraction:
326: \begin{equation}
327: \label{CF1}
328: \frac{N_0}{N}=1-\left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^{5/2}\,.
329: \end{equation}
330: %
331: Here, $T_c$ is given by (\ref{Tc0}) and (\ref{Tc1}), (\ref{Tc2}), respectively.
332: In general, the condensate fraction is given by
333: %
334: \begin{equation}
335: \label{CF2}
336: \frac{N_0}{N}=1-\left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^{3}\frac{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega)}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)}\,,
337: \end{equation}
338: %
339: where $\beta_c=1/(k_BT_c)$.
340: In the low-temperature limit $T\!\downarrow\!0$,
341: the condensate fraction shows a power-law behavior which is different in the two regimes of undercritical rotation
342: $\Omega<\omega_\bot$ and overcritical rotation $\Omega>\omega_\bot$.
343: Due to (\ref{Zeta2}) and (\ref{Zeta6}), we obtain
344: %
345: \begin{equation}
346: \label{CF3}
347: \hspace{-5mm}\frac{N_0}{N} \approx
348: \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
349: {\displaystyle 1-\frac{k_B^3\zeta(3)}{N\hbar^3\omega_z(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)}\,T^3}&\!\!;\, \Omega<\omega_\bot\,,\\[5mm]
350: %%
351: {\displaystyle 1-\frac{M\sqrt{\pi}k_B^{5/2}\zeta(5/2)}{N\sqrt{k}\hbar^3\omega_z}\,T^{5/2} } &\!\!;\, \Omega > \omega_\bot\,.
352: \end{array}\right.
353: \end{equation}
354: %
355: The temperature dependence of the condensate fraction $N_0/N$ following from (\ref{CF2}) is shown in Fig.~\ref{PCF1}
356: and Fig.~\ref{PCF2}.
357: From this we read off that the temperature dependence of the condensate fraction depends crucially on the rotation
358: frequency and is thus not universal.
359: %
360: \section{Heat Capacity}
361: %
362: The heat capacity follows from the grand-canonical free energy $\mathcal{F}=U-TS-\mu N$, where $U$ is the internal energy
363: and $S$ is the entropy, according to
364: %
365: \begin{equation}
366: \label{HC1}
367: C=\left.\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right|_{N,V}\,.
368: \end{equation}
369: %
370: Within the grand-canonical ensemble, the heat capacity has to be determined separately in the two regimes $T>T_c$
371: and $T<T_c$.
372: %
373: \subsection{Gase Phase}
374: %
375: At first, we treat the gas phase where $N_0=0$ and determine the entropy via the thermodynamical relation
376: $S=-(\partial \mathcal{F}/\partial T)_{V,\mu}$:
377: %
378: \begin{eqnarray}
379: \label{S1}
380: \frac{S_>}{k_BN}&=&\frac{7\zeta_4(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}{2\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}+\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2\frac{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu})}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}\nonumber\\[2mm]
381: &&-\left[\beta\mu+\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2\right]
382: \end{eqnarray}
383: %
384: The internal energy $U=\mathcal{F}+TS+\mu N$ then follows from (\ref{FG2}), (\ref{N1}), (\ref{S1}) and reads
385: %
386: \begin{eqnarray}
387: \label{U1}
388: \frac{U_>}{Nk_BT}&=&\frac{5\zeta_4(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}{2\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}\nonumber\\
389: &&+\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2\left[\frac{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu})}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}-1\right]\,.
390: \end{eqnarray}
391: %
392: Finally, the heat capacity (\ref{HC1}) for temperatures above $T_c$ is given by
393: %%%%%%%%%%
394: \begin{figure}[t]
395: \center\begin{minipage}[t]{.4\textwidth}
396: \center\includegraphics[scale=.65]{Fig5.eps}
397: \put(-7,1.5){\rotatebox{90}{\small $C/k_BN$}}
398: \put(-4,-0.3){\small $T/T_c(\Omega=0)$}
399: \put(-4.5,.8){\small $\Omega=\sqrt{2}\omega_\bot$}
400: \put(-3.5,2.8){\small $\Omega=0$}
401: \renewcommand{\figurename}{FIG.}
402: \caption{\small Approach of the heat capacity (\ref{HC2}), solid lines, and its approximation (\ref{HC2DP}),
403: dashed lines, to the Dulong-Petit law, horizontal line.}
404: \label{PHC3}
405: \end{minipage}
406: \end{figure}
407: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
408: \begin{eqnarray}
409: \label{HC2}
410: \frac{C_>}{k_BN}&=&\frac{35\zeta_4(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}{4\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}-\frac{25\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}{4\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}\nonumber\\[2mm]
411: &&\hspace{-15mm}+\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2\left[\frac{11\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu})}{2\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}-5\frac{\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu})}{\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}\right]
412: \nonumber\\[2mm]
413: &&\hspace{-15mm}+\gamma_T^2(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^4\frac{\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu})\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)-\zeta_2^2(e^{\beta\mu})}{\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}\,.
414: \end{eqnarray}
415: %
416: To obtain this result, we have determined the derivative $(\partial \beta\mu/ \partial T)_{N,V}$ from (\ref{N1}).
417: In the limit $k\downarrow 0$ of a harmonic trap, the heat capacity (\ref{HC2}) reduces to the well-known result
418: %
419: \begin{equation}
420: \label{HC2L}
421: \frac{C_>}{k_BN}=12\frac{\zeta_4(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)} - 9\frac{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}{\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu},\Omega)}\,;\,k=0\,.
422: \end{equation}
423: %
424: Again, both cases $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ and $\Omega\to\infty$ yield the same analytic expression:
425: %
426: \begin{eqnarray}
427: \label{HC2rl}
428: \frac{C_>}{k_BN} &=& \frac{35}{4}\frac{ \zeta_{7/2}\left( e^{\beta\mu +
429: \gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2} \right) }{ \zeta_{5/2}\left( e^{\beta \mu + \gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2} \right) }\nonumber\\[2mm]
430: &&-\frac{25}{4}\frac{ \zeta_{5/2}\left( e^{\beta\mu+\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2} \right) }{ \zeta_{3/2}\left( e^{\beta\mu+\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2} \right) } \, .
431: \end{eqnarray}
432: %
433: Now, we investigate the heat capacity (\ref{HC2}) in the high temperature limit $T\to\infty$.
434: To this end we use a large $T$-expansion of the generalized $\zeta$-function (\ref{Zeta1}):
435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
436: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
437: \begin{figure}[t]
438: \center\begin{minipage}[tb]{.4\textwidth}
439: \center\includegraphics[scale=.65]{Fig6.eps}
440: \put(-4,-.3){$T/T_c(k=0)$}
441: \put(-7,1.5){\rotatebox{90}{$C/k_BN$}}
442: \put(-4.4,2.8){$k=0$}
443: \put(-2.9,2.3){$k\neq0$}
444: \renewcommand{\figurename}{FIG.}
445: \caption{\small Heat capacity versus temperature without rotation, reduced to the critical temperature (\ref{Tc0})
446: of the trap (\ref{Vrot1}) with $k=0$. The dashed line corresponds to the harmonic trap heat capacity (\ref{HC2L}),
447: (\ref{HC3L}) for the Paris trap (\ref{Vrot1}) with $k=0$. The black solid line is the heat capacity (\ref{HC2}),
448: (\ref{HC3}) for the anharmonic Paris trap \cite{Bretin}. The horizontal lines correspond to the Dulong-Petit law:
449: harmonic trap (dashed) and anharmonic trap (gray).}
450: \label{PHC1}
451: \end{minipage}
452: \end{figure}
453: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
454: \begin{eqnarray}
455: \label{Zeta4}
456: \zeta_\nu\left( z,\Omega \right)\!\!&\approx&\!
457: e^{\beta\mu}\left[ \sqrt{\pi\gamma_T}(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2) - 2\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2 + ... \right]\nonumber\\
458: &&\hspace{-2cm} + \frac{e^{2\beta\mu}}{2^\nu}\!\left[\! \sqrt{2\gamma_T}(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2) - 4\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2 \!+ ... \right]+ ...\,.
459: \end{eqnarray}
460: %
461: Inserting the expansion (\ref{Zeta4}) into the number of particles (\ref{N1}), we find for the first order of the
462: fugacity $e^{\beta\mu}\approx2N\sqrt{\hbar^6\omega_z^2k}/\sqrt{\pi M^2k_B^5T^{5}}$, so that the heat capacity (\ref{HC2}) behaves like
463: %
464: \begin{equation}
465: \label{HC2DP}
466: \frac{C_>}{k_BN}\!\approx\!\frac{5}{2}+ \frac{\gamma_T}{4\,\sqrt{\pi}}(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2) -
467: \frac{ \gamma_T^3 \left(4-\pi \right) }{ 32\,\pi^{3/2} }(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^3 \,.
468: \end{equation}
469: %
470: Thus, the heat capacity approaches the Dulong-Petit law in an anharmonic trap $\lim_{T\to\infty}{C_>/(k_BN)}=5/2$
471: which is $1/2$ smaller than the corresponding one in the harmonic trap.
472: Furthermore, the first $\Omega$ dependent term in (\ref{HC2DP}) changes its behavior, from being larger ($\Omega<\omega_\bot$) than
473: the limit to being smaller ($\Omega>\omega_\bot$), see Fig.~\ref{PHC3}. \\
474: At the critical point, the harmonic heat capacity (\ref{HC2L}) reduces for small rotation frequencies $\Omega<\omega_\bot$ to
475: %
476: \begin{equation}
477: \label{HCTC2}
478: \lim_{T\downarrow T_c}{\frac{C_>}{k_BN}} = 12\frac{\zeta(4)}{\zeta(3)}-9\frac{\zeta(3)}{\zeta(2)}\approx4.23\,;\,\,k=0\,.
479: \end{equation}
480: %
481: In both limits $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ and $\Omega\to\infty$, the heat capacity (\ref{HC2rl}) at the critical point is given by
482: %
483: \begin{eqnarray}
484: \label{HCTC1}
485: \lim_{T\downarrow T_c}{\frac{C_>}{k_BN}} &=& \frac{35}{4}\frac{\zeta(7/2)}{\zeta(5/2)}-\frac{25}{4}\frac{\zeta(5/2)}{\zeta(3/2)} \approx 4.14\,.
486: \end{eqnarray}
487: %
488: \subsection{Condensate Phase}
489: %
490: Now we turn to the condensate phase $T<T_c$ where the chemical potential is given by (\ref{Mu1}).
491: For the entropy, we obtain
492: %
493: \begin{eqnarray}
494: \label{S2}
495: \frac{S_<}{k_BN}&=&\left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^3 \left\{ \frac{7\zeta_4(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega)}{2\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)}
496: -\beta\mu_c\frac{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega)}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)} \right.\nonumber\\[2mm]
497: &&\hspace{-10mm}\left.+\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2 \left[\frac{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu_c})-\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega)}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)}\right] \right\}.
498: \end{eqnarray}
499: %
500: The internal energy below the critical temperature reads
501: %
502: \begin{eqnarray}
503: \label{U2}
504: \frac{U_<}{Nk_BT}&=&\left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^3\left\{\frac{5\zeta_4(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega)}{2\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)}+\gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2\right.
505: \nonumber\\[2mm]
506: &&\hspace{-2cm}\left.\times\left[\frac{\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu_c})-\Theta(\omega_\bot-\Omega)\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega)}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)} \right]\right\}+\mu_c N\,,
507: \end{eqnarray}
508: %
509: where $\Theta$ denotes the Heaviside function.
510: Thus, we find for the heat capacity below the critical temperature with help of Eq.~(\ref{Mu1})
511: %
512: \begin{eqnarray}
513: \label{HC3}
514: \frac{C_<}{k_BN} &=& \left( \frac{T}{T_c} \right)^3 \left\{ \frac{35\zeta_4(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega)}{4\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)}
515: + \gamma_T(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^2 \right.\nonumber\\
516: &&\nonumber\\
517: &&\hspace*{-7mm}\times \left[ \frac{ 11\zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu_c}) }{ 2\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)} - 5\Theta(\omega_\bot-\Omega)
518: \frac{ \zeta_3(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega) }{ \zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega) }\right]\nonumber\\[2mm]
519: &&\hspace*{-7mm}+\,\gamma_T^2(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)^4\left[\Theta(\Omega-\omega_\bot)\frac{\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu_c})}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)}\right.\nonumber\\[2mm]
520: &&\hspace*{-7mm}-\left.\left.\Theta(\omega_\bot-\Omega)\frac{\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu_c})-\zeta_2(e^{\beta\mu_c},\Omega)}{\zeta_3(e^{\beta_c\mu_c},\Omega)} \right]\right\}\,.
521: \end{eqnarray}
522: %
523: In the limit $k\downarrow 0$, Eq.~(\ref{HC3}) simplifies to
524: %
525: \begin{equation}
526: \label{HC3L}
527: \frac{C_<}{k_BN}=12\frac{\zeta(4)}{\zeta(3)}\left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^3\,;\,\,k=0\,.
528: \end{equation}
529: %
530: Thus, at the critical point it has the value
531: %
532: \begin{equation}
533: \label{HCTC3}
534: \lim_{T\uparrow T_c}{\frac{C_<}{k_BN}} = 12\frac{\zeta(4)}{\zeta(3)}\approx10.80\,;\,\,k=0\,.
535: \end{equation}
536: %
537: In both limits $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ and $\Omega\to\infty$, the heat capacity is given by
538: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
539: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
540: \begin{figure}[t]
541: \center\begin{minipage}[t]{.4\textwidth}
542: \center\includegraphics[scale=.65]{Fig7.eps}
543: \put(-7,2){\rotatebox{90}{\small $C/k_BN$}}
544: \put(-4,-0.3){\small $T/T_c(\Omega=0)$}
545: \renewcommand{\figurename}{FIG.}
546: \caption[Heat capacity just below the critical point versus rotation frequency.]{\small Heat capacity versus
547: temperature, reduced to the critical temperature $T_c(\Omega=0)$ of the anharmonic trap (\ref{Vrot1}) for varying
548: rotation frequencies. The lines correspond to $\Omega=0$ (solid), $\Omega=\omega_\bot$ (long dashes), and $\Omega=2\omega_\bot$ (short dashes).
549: The gray solid line corresponds to the Dulong-Petit law, the first term of (\ref{HC2DP}). We note that for $\Omega=2\omega_\bot$
550: and $T>T_c$ the heat capacity approaches the Dulong-Petit limit from below (see Fig.~\ref{PHC3}).}
551: \label{PHC2}
552: \end{minipage}
553: \end{figure}
554: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
555: \begin{equation}
556: \label{HC3lr}
557: \frac{C_<}{k_BN} = \frac{35}{4} \frac{\zeta(7/2)}{\zeta(5/2)}\left(\frac{T}{T_c}\right)^{5/2}
558: \end{equation}
559: %
560: so that the heat capacity (\ref{HC3}) at the critical point reduces to
561: %
562: \begin{equation}
563: \label{HCTC4}
564: \lim_{T\uparrow T_c}{\frac{C_{<}}{k_BN}} = \frac{35}{4}\frac{\zeta(7/2)}{\zeta(5/2)}\approx7.35\,.
565: \end{equation}
566: %
567: In the low temperature limit $T\downarrow0$, the heat capacity (\ref{HC3}) tends to zero in accordance with the third law of
568: thermodynamics.
569: We note that the low-temperature limit of the heat capacity (\ref{HCLT}) has the same power-law behavior as the
570: corresponding one of the condensate fraction (\ref{CF3}):
571: %
572: \begin{equation}
573: \label{HCLT}
574: \frac{C_<}{k_BN} \approx \left\{
575: \begin{array}{ll}
576: {\displaystyle \frac{35k_B^3\zeta(4)}{4N\hbar^3\omega_z(\omega_\bot^2-\Omega^2)}\,T^3} &\!\!;\,\Omega<\omega_\bot\\[5mm]
577: {\displaystyle \frac{35M\sqrt{\pi}k_B^{5/2}\zeta(7/2)}{4N\sqrt{k}\hbar^3\omega_z}\,T^{5/2} } & \!\!;\,\Omega>\omega_\bot\,.
578: \end{array}\right.
579: \end{equation}
580: %
581: Fig.~\ref{PHC1} shows the temperature dependence of the heat capacity for the values of the Paris experiment without
582: rotation \cite{Bretin}.
583: We see that the effect of the anharmonicity is rather small.
584: According to Ehrenfest's classification, the discontinuity at the critical temperature characterizes the phase
585: transition to be of second order.
586: In Fig.~\ref{PHC2} we show how the heat capacity depends on the rotation frequency $\Omega$.
587: Here, the rotation has a huge influence on the temperature dependence of the heat capacity.
588: %
589: \section{Conclusions}
590: %
591: We have determined a semiclassical approximation for
592: the critical temperature $T_c$ at which the condensation of a rotating ideal Bose gas occurs in
593: the anharmonic trap (\ref{Vrot1}).
594: We have found that condensation is possible even in the overcritical rotation regime $\Omega>\omega_\bot$ which is in contrast with
595: the harmonic trap where the condensate gets lost, when the rotation frequency $\Omega$ gets close to the trap frequency $\omega_\bot$.
596: Our value for the critical temperature $T_c\approx64$~nK at the critical rotation frequency $\Omega=\omega_\bot$
597: yields $k_B T_c / \hbar \omega_z \approx 120 \gg 1$ which justifies a posteriori our semiclassical treatment. However,
598: the value $T_c\approx64$~nK is about three
599: times smaller than the one estimated in the Paris experiment \cite{Bretin}.
600: This huge discrepancy could not be explained with the circumstance that our semiclassical analysis of the rotating ideal
601: Bose gas neglects three important aspects, namely finite-size corrections, interactions between the particles, and the
602: effect of vortices in the condensate.
603: All three should have the effect of lowering the critical temperature.
604: In a harmonic trap, it was found numerically that the finiteness of the system slightly lowers the critical
605: temperature \cite{Ketterle96} which was also shown analytically \cite{Grossmann95,Haugset97}.
606: Furthermore, an additional weak repulsive two-particle contact interaction leads to a negative shift of just a few
607: percent \cite{Gio96,As04}. Therefore, we conclude that our semiclassical findings ask for a revised
608: experimental measurement of the critical temperature for a rotating Bose gas.\\
609: For the condensate fraction, we can state that the low-temperature behavior crucially depends on the rotation frequency
610: $\Omega$.
611: It shows a non-uniform temperature dependence which is in between the two power-laws $T^{5/2}$ and $T^3$. \\
612: The heat capacity of the rotating ideal Bose gas is discontinuous at the critical temperature.
613: It tends in agreement with the third law of thermodynamics to zero in the low temperature limit $T\downarrow0$, and approaches the
614: Dulong-Petit law (\ref{HC2DP}) in the high temperature limit $T\to\infty$ from above ($\Omega\leq\omega_\bot$) or from below ($\Omega>\omega_\bot$). \\
615: %
616: \section{Acknowledgement}
617: %
618: We thank Jean Dalibard, Hagen Kleinert, and Sabine Stock for critical reading of the manuscript as well as Robert Graham
619: for the hospitality at the University Duisburg-Essen.
620: Furthermore, support from the DFG Priority Program SPP 1116 {\it Interaction in Ultracold Gases of Atoms and Molecules}
621: is acknowledged.
622: %
623: \begin{thebibliography}{199}
624: %
625: \bibitem{Dali00}
626: F.~Chevy, K.W.~Madison, and J.~Dalibard,
627: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 2223 (2000)
628: %
629: \bibitem{Ketterle01}
630: C.~Raman, J.R.~Abo-Shaeer, J.M.~Vogels, K.~Xu, and W.~Ketterle,
631: Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~{\bf 87}, 210402 (2001)
632: %
633: \bibitem{Donelly}
634: R.J.~Donelly, {\it Quantized Vortices in Helium II}
635: (Cambridge Univ.~Press, Cambridge, 1991)
636: %
637: \bibitem{Fetter01}
638: A.L.~Fetter,
639: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 64}, 063608 (2001)
640: %
641: \bibitem{Rosenbusch}
642: P.~Rosenbusch, D.S.~Petrov, S.~Sinha, F.~Chevy,
643: V.~Bretin, Y.~Castin, G.~Shlyapnikov, and J.~Dalibard,
644: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 250403 (2002)
645: %
646: \bibitem{Bretin}
647: V.~Bretin, S.~Stock, Y.~Seurin, and J.~Dalibard,
648: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 050403 (2004)
649: %
650: \bibitem{Bagnato87}
651: V.~Bagnato, D.E.~Pritchard, and D.~Kleppner,
652: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 35}, 4354 (1987)
653: %
654: \bibitem{Yukalov}
655: Ph.~W.~Courteille, V.S.~Bagnato, and V.I. Yukalov,
656: Las. Phys. {\bf 11}, 659 (2001)
657: %
658: \bibitem{Pitaevskii}
659: L.P.~Pitaevskii and S.~Stringari, {\it Bose-Einstein Condensation}
660: (Science Pub., Oxford, 2003)
661: %
662: \bibitem{Pethick}
663: C.J.~Pethick and H.~Smith, {\it Bose-Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases}
664: (Cambridge Univ.~Press, Cambridge, 2002)
665: %
666: \bibitem{StockLP}
667: S.~Stock, B.~Battelier, V.~Bretin, Z.~Hadzibabic, and J.~Dalibard,
668: Las. Phys. Lett. {\bf 2}, 275 (2005)
669: %
670: \bibitem{StockPhD}
671: S.~Stock,
672: {\it Quantized Vortices in a Bose-Einstein Condensate:
673: Thermal Activation and Dynamic Nucleation},
674: PhD thesis, Universit{\'e} Paris 6,{\nobreakspace} France, January 2006
675: %
676: \bibitem{Ketterle96}
677: W.~Ketterle and N.J.~van Druten,
678: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 54}, 656 (1996)
679: %
680: \bibitem{Grossmann95}
681: S.~Grossmann and M.~Holthaus,
682: Phys. Lett. A {\bf 208}, 188 (1995)
683: %
684: \bibitem{Haugset97}
685: T.~Haugset, H.~Haugerud, and J.O.~Andersen,
686: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 55}, 2922 (1997)
687: %
688: \bibitem{Gio96}
689: S.~Giorgini, L.P.~Pitaevskii, and S.~Stringari,
690: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 54}, R4633 (1996)
691: %
692: \bibitem{As04}
693: F.~Gerbier, J.H.~Thywissen, S.~Richard, M.~Hugbart, P.~Bouyer, and A.~Aspect,
694: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 030405 (2004)
695: %
696: \end{thebibliography}
697: %
698: \end{document}
699: