1: %\documentclass[11pt,emtex]{article}
2: \documentclass[debug,overfull]{epl} %[a4,twocolumn]
3: \usepackage{epsfig}
4: \usepackage{changebar}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7: \usepackage{subfigure}
8: \usepackage{amsmath}
9: \usepackage{rotating}
10: \usepackage{amsfonts}
11: \usepackage{amssymb}
12: \newlength {\oldtextheight}
13: \newlength {\oldheadsep}
14: \setlength {\oldtextheight}{\textheight}
15: \setlength {\oldheadsep}{\headsep}
16: \newcommand {\longpage}{\enlargethispage{\baselineskip}}
17: \newcommand {\shortpage}{\enlargethispage{-\baselineskip}}
18: \psfigdriver{dvips}
19:
20: \begin{document}
21: \title{Aging and intermittency in a p-spin model of a glass}
22: \shorttitle{Aging of p-spin model}
23: \author{Paolo Sibani}
24: \institute{Institut for Fysik og Kemi, SDU, DK5230 Odense M, Denmark}
25: \pacs{65.60.+a}{Thermal properties of amorphous solids and glasses}
26: \pacs{05.40.-a}{Fluctuation phenomena, random processes, noise, and Brownian
27: motion}
28: \pacs{61.43.Fs }{Glasses}
29: \date{\today}
30: \maketitle
31: \begin{abstract}
32: We numerically analyze the statistics of the heat flow between
33: an aging system and its thermal bath, following a method
34: proposed and tested for a spin-glass
35: model in a recent Letter (P. Sibani and H.J. Jensen, Europhys. Lett.69, 563 (2005)).
36: The present system, which lacks quenched randomness, consists of Ising
37: spins located on a cubic lattice, with each plaquette
38: contributing to the total energy the product of
39: the four spins located at its corners.
40: Similarly to our previous findings,
41: energy leaves the system in rare but large,
42: so called intermittent, bursts
43: which are embedded in reversible and equilibrium-like
44: fluctuations of zero average.
45: The intermittent bursts, or quakes, dissipate
46: the excess energy trapped in the
47: initial state at a rate which falls off with the inverse of the
48: age. This strongly heterogeneous dynamical picture is explained using
49: the idea that quakes are triggered by energy fluctuations of record
50: size, which occur independently within a number of thermalized domains.
51: From the temperature dependence of the width of the
52: reversible heat fluctuations we surmise that these domains have
53: an exponential density of states. Finally, we show
54: that the heat flow consists of
55: a temperature independent term and
56: a term with an Arrhenius temperature dependence.
57: Microscopic dynamical and structural information can thus
58: be extracted from numerical intermittency data. This type of analysis
59: seems now within the reach
60: of time resolved micro-calorimetry techniques.
61: \end{abstract}
62:
63: \section{Introduction}
64: Following the change of an external parameter,
65: e.g. \ a temperature quench, complex
66: systems unable to re-equilibrate within
67: observational time scales undergo a so-called aging process.
68: During aging, physical quantities slowly change as a function of the
69: time elapsed since the quench, a time conventionally denoted by the
70: term `age'.
71: In \emph{mesoscopic} sized systems~\cite{Bissig03,Buisson03}
72: aging manifests itself through a sequence of large, so-called
73: intermittent, configurational re-arrangements. These
74: events generate non-Gaussian tails
75: in the probability density function (PDF) of configurational probes
76: such as colloidal particle displacement~\cite{Kegel00,Weeks00} and
77: correlation~\cite{Cipelletti03a}
78: or voltage noise fluctuations in glasses~\cite{Buisson03a}.
79: The intermittent signal contains valuable dynamical information
80: which is straightforwardly collected in numerical simulations
81: and which now seems within reach of highly sensitive
82: calorimetric techniques~\cite{Fon05}.
83:
84: The present work confirms the expected wider applicability
85: of the method previously introduced in a Letter~\cite{Sibani05},
86: and extends the analysis to include the temperature dependence of the
87: rate of energy flow. Secondly,
88: it features a more extensive discussion of
89: record dynamics~\cite{Sibani03} as a paradigm
90: for non-equilibrium aging and intermittency.
91:
92: We consider the plaquette model~\cite{Lipowski00,Swift00}, which
93: belongs to a class of Ising models
94: with multiple spin interactions~\cite{Lipowski00,Swift00,Garrahan00,Davison01,Mezard02},
95: known to possess central
96: features of glassiness, e.g. a metastable super-cooled phase
97: as well as an aging phase~\cite{Lipowski00,Swift00}.
98:
99: In the sequel, a short summary is given of the relevant
100: properties of the p-spin model and of the
101: Waiting Time Algorithm~\cite{Dall01} (WTM) used in the simulations.
102: As a check of this algorithm, we calculate the known
103: equilibrium and metastability
104: properties of the model before turning to
105: the heat flow analysis. We show that irreversible
106: intermittent events, so called \emph{quakes},
107: can be disentangled from the reversible and
108: equilibrium-like fluctuations of zero average which
109: occur around metastable configurations. The age and temperature dependences
110: of the statistics of both types of events are described in detail.
111: In the final section, our findings are summarized and placed in a broader context.
112: \section{The model}
113: \label{model}
114: We consider a set of $N=16^3$ Ising spins, $\sigma_i = \pm 1$, placed on a cubic
115: lattice with periodic boundary conditions. The spins
116: interact via the `plaquette' Hamiltonian
117: \begin{equation}
118: {\cal H} = -\sum_{{\cal P}_{ijkl}} \sigma_i\sigma_j \sigma_k \sigma_l,
119: \label{hamilt}
120: \end{equation}
121: where the sum runs over all the elementary plaquettes of the lattice,
122: each contributing the product of the four spins located at its corners.
123:
124: By inspection, a `crystalline' ground
125: state of the model is the fully polarized state with energy
126: per spin $\epsilon_G= -3$. Other ground states can be
127: obtained by inverting the spins in any plane orthogonal
128: to the $x$, $y$ or $z$ axes. These symmetries lead to a
129: degeneracy $\approx 2^{3L}$, where $L$ is the linear lattice size.
130:
131: The simulations of Lipowski and Johnston~\cite{Lipowski00} show a disordered
132: equilibrium state above $T \approx 3.6$, and, between $T=3.6$
133: and $T \approx 3.4$,
134: the presence of a metastable `super-cooled liquid' phase. According to
135: Swift et al.~\cite{Swift00} the energy autocorrelation function decays in this regime as a stretched
136: exponential, with no age dependence. The duration of the
137: metastable plateau diverges as $T \downarrow 3.4$. Below
138: this temperature aging sets in.
139: \section{The WTM algorithm}
140: \label{WTM}
141: Monte Carlo algorithms reproduce central
142: features of aging dynamics,
143: and their use to study aging systems
144: is thus empirically, if not rigorously, justified.
145: As in ref.~\cite{Sibani05}, the present simulations rely on the WTM~\cite{Dall01},
146: a rejectionless (event driven) MC algorithm~\cite{Newman99d},
147: which obeys detailed balance. Unlike the Metropolis algorithm, the WTM relies on
148: an intrinsic or `global' time variable, which is
149: akin to the clock time of a physical system, modulo
150: an overall scale factor of little significance
151: for aging behavior, where most quantities of interest depend on
152: time ratios.
153:
154: Let $b_i$ denote the energy change associated with the
155: flipping of spin $i$ with fixed neighbors. For a given initial configuration,
156: random waiting times $w_i$ are drawn from an exponential distribution with average
157: $\tau_i =\exp(b_i/2T)$.
158: A WTM move identifies the shortest waiting time,
159: adds it to the `global' time variable,
160: and flips the corresponding spin.
161: Spins whose $b$ values are affected by the current
162: move have their waiting times recalculated.
163: The others do not, since the statistical properties of their
164: (memoryless) waiting process would be unchanged by a renewed evaluation.
165: In unstable configurations, where negative $b_i$ values are present,
166: the WTM generates short waiting times, leading to
167: the nucleation of flip avalanches, which can be followed in detail.
168: In Metropolis simulations,
169: the spins considered for update are
170: randomly selected, and events
171: below the shortest time unit of one MC sweep cannot be resolved.
172: Thus, while all MC algorithms with detailed balance converge, under weak conditions,
173: to the same (Boltzmann) equilibrium state, they may do so
174: in different ways, see e.g.\ ref.~\cite{Gotcheva05}.
175: For our model, a comparison of the time dependence of the
176: average energy to results previously obtained with the Metropolis algorithm
177: only shows minor differences.
178: \begin{figure}[t]
179: \centering
180: \mbox{
181: \subfigure[Energy relaxation]{\epsfig{figure=aging_energies.eps,width=.47\textwidth}} \quad
182: \subfigure[Heat flow PDF]{\epsfig{figure=drift.eps,width=.47\textwidth}}} \quad
183: \caption{{\em (a)}: The energy per spin is plotted vs. the system age for several
184: temperatures, showing, from top to bottom, the presence of thermal equilibrium, metastability and aging.
185: Data points are shown with symbols, the dotted lines are guides to the eye.
186: In each panel, the temperatures corresponding to the five curves shown are,
187: listed from top to the bottom: $T=4.75,4.25,3.75, 3.57, 3.50$ (upper panel), $T=3.475,3.45,3.40,3.25,3.00$
188: (middle panel) and $T=1.25,1.50,1.75,2.25,2.50$ (lower panel).
189: {\em (b)}: the PDF of the heat exchanged over an interval $\delta t$
190: at $T=1$ is sampled in the interval $[t_w, 3 t_w]$. The three data sets shown have $t_w=300, 1000$ and $5000$
191: respectively, with a fixed
192: ratio $\delta t/t_w =0.01$. The insert shows similarly collected data for $t_w=5000$
193: and $T=3.475$. The line is a fit of the data to a function which equals
194: an exponential for sufficiently negative $H$ value and a Gaussian for the rest of the range.
195: }
196: \label{aging_of_energy}
197: \end{figure}
198: % made with program /home/paolo/bose/WTM/4SPINS/plot_en.m
199: % and with /home/paolo/bose/WTM/4SPINS/RUN_DIR/PDFscalefit.m
200: \section{Results}
201: \label{meanenergy}
202: Fig.~\ref{aging_of_energy}\emph{(a)} demonstrates
203: the three known relaxation regimes of this model:
204: For approximately $T\geq 3.500$, (top section),
205: the energy immediately equilibrates at a high value.
206: (The fast initial equilibration stage is omitted).
207: In the interval $3.00< T< 3.475$ (middle section), the
208: final equilibrium near
209: the ground state energy is reached after dwelling in
210: a metastable plateau. The duration of the plateau grows with the
211: temperature, reaching its maximum near $T=3.475$, i.e. near
212: the temperature where metastability disappears. The equilibrium
213: mean energy correspondingly undergoes an abrupt change between $T=3.475$ and $T=3.5$,
214: in a way reminiscent of a first order transition\cite{Lipowski00}.
215: At the low temperature end of the metastable regime, the plateau gradually
216: softens, giving rise to a nearly logarithmic decay of the energy.
217: Approximately below $T = 2.50$ (bottom section) the energy value
218: reached at any stage decreases with increasing temperature, an extreme
219: non-equilibrium situation typical for the aging regime. In summary, the WTM
220: and the Metropolis algorithm used in other works agree on the thermodynamical
221: (average) behavior, with the hardly significant exception of the duration of the
222: metastable plateau. The latter attains its maximum value at $T=3.40$ under the Metropolis
223: update~\cite{Swift00}, and at a slightly higher temperature in the WTM case.
224:
225: To investigate the energy flow statistics we choose a
226: time interval $\delta t$ and partition the observation
227: time $t$ into $[t/\delta t]$ intervals of equal duration. The heat $H$ exchanged
228: over $\delta t$ arises as the difference between the energies of the two
229: configurations at the endpoints of the interval,
230: \begin{equation}
231: H_n = E(t_w +(n+1)\delta t) - E(t_w +n\delta t), \quad n=1,2, \ldots [t/\delta t]
232: \label{H_definition}
233: \end{equation}
234: From ref.~\cite{Sibani05}, we expect the rate of energy flow
235: to fall off as $1/t_w$ (pure aging), leading to a
236: $\delta t/t_w$ scaling of the PDF. For the present model,
237: the collapse of three PDF's shown in the main
238: plot of Fig.~\ref{aging_of_energy}, panel \emph{(b)} confirms
239: this expectation.
240: The PDF's are collected at $T=1.0$,
241: i.e. deep in the aging regime, during time intervals
242: $[t_w,3 t_w]$, with $t_w=300, 1000$ and $5000$,
243: (squares, diamonds and polygons, respectively), keeping the ratio
244: $\delta t/t_w$ constant and equal to $0.01$.
245: The insert shows data taken at $T=3.475$, i.e. at the upper edge of the
246: metastable region. The calculations are repeated for $200$
247: independent trajectories, giving a total of $20000$ data points
248: for each PDF.
249:
250: The full line is a least square fit of the data
251: to a continuous function comprising an exponential tail, $f_<(H)\propto e^{H/q}$ for $H<d<0$, and a Gaussian
252: part centered at zero, $f_> \propto e^{-H^2/2{\sigma^2}_{rev}} $ for $H>d$. The position, $d$,
253: of the joining point is itself a fitting parameter. As the overall scale of the PDF
254: is arbitrary, the three parameters of physical significance are
255: $q, \sigma_{rev}$ and $d$.
256: Figure~\ref{aging_of_energy} \emph{(b)} already
257: indicates that the exponential intermittent tail carries the
258: bulk of the energy flow. This also applies
259: to the $T=3.475$ data shown in the insert, even though
260: at this temperature, which is outside the aging regime,
261: the intermittent events are swamped by the reversible Gaussian fluctuations.
262: \begin{figure}[t]
263: \centering
264: \mbox{
265: \subfigure[Age dependence of intermittency]{\epsfig{figure=heat_PDFsT1.eps,width=.45\textwidth}} \quad
266: \subfigure[Rate of energy flow]{\epsfig{figure=rate_vs_age.eps,width=.45\textwidth}}} \quad
267: \caption{{\em (a)}: The PDF of the heat exchanged
268: between system and thermal bath over a time $\delta t=5$. Negative values correspond to an
269: energy outflow.
270: The data are based on $200$ independent
271: runs, taken at temperature $T=1$ in the intervals $[t_w,t_w+500]$ for
272: $t_w=1000$ (diamonds), $t_w=2000$ (squares) $t_w=4000$ (polygons)
273: $t_w=8000$ (hexagons) and $t_w=16000$ (circles).
274: {\em (b)}: The average rate of flow of the energy is plotted versus the age
275: for the five temperatures shown.
276: The full line has the form $y = c t_w^{-1}$, with the proportionality constant $c$ estimated as
277: the mean of $t_w r_E$.
278: }
279: \label{heat_flow}
280: \end{figure}
281: Further properties of the heat flow at $T=1$ are illustrated by panel \emph{(a)} of Fig. \ref{heat_flow}.
282: The five PDF's shown are semilogarithmic plots
283: of the distribution of $80000$ values of $H$ taken with $\delta t=5$.
284: The values are sampled from $800$ independent trajectories,
285: each stretching over an `observation' interval of duration $t=500$.
286:
287: For sufficiently negative $H$ values, all the PDFs have an exponential intermittent tail, which turns into
288: a bell shaped, nearly Gaussian distribution as $H$ increases toward and beyond zero.
289: The strongest intermittency observed in these data (top curve) is for
290: $t_w=10^3$. Successively doubling $t_w$, up to $t_w=1.6 \times 10^4$,
291: leads to PDF's approaching a Gaussian shape. This expresses the well known
292: fact that aging systems appear equilibrated, when observed over a time shorter
293: than their age.
294: Importantly, the Gaussian part of the PDF has no conspicuous age dependence.
295:
296: The full lines are, as mentioned, obtained as least square fits of the PDF data
297: to a continuous, piecewise differentiable curve.
298: The parameter $\sigma^2_{rev}$ estimates the variance of the reversible fluctuations
299: and should not be confused with the full variance of $H$, which is mainly determined by the
300: tail of the PDF.
301:
302: The instantaneous rate of energy flow, a constant
303: for time homogeneous dynamics,
304: is here inversely proportional to the age.
305: Ideally, this rate is obtained as the ensemble average of the ratio
306: $\frac{H(\delta t, t_w)}{\delta t}$, i.e.,
307: \begin{equation}
308: r_E(t_w) \stackrel{{\rm def}}{=} \lim_{\delta t \rightarrow 0}\frac{\langle H(\delta t, t_w)\rangle}{\delta t} .
309: \end{equation}
310: In practice we (mainly) use an ensemble of $1000$
311: independent trajectories,
312: and perform in addition a time average over a
313: finite observation interval $t$.
314: We use $t=30$ for $t_w \le 2500$, $t=100$ for $t_w \le 40000$ and
315: $t=500$ for $t_w > 40000$. By varying $\delta t$ over the interval
316: $[0.1,23]$ we ascertain that $\langle H \rangle$
317: is linearly dependent on $\delta t$. Finally, we estimate
318: $r_E$ as the arithmetic average of $H(\delta t, t_w)/\delta t$,
319: over the approx. $5500$ data points available at each temperature.
320: Panel \emph{(b)} of Fig. \ref{heat_flow} shows
321: in a log-log plot the negative energy flow rate
322: versus the system age, for five selected temperatures.
323: To avoid clutter, the data sets belonging to each $T$ value
324: are artificially
325: shifted in the vertical direction by dividing, in order of increasing $T$,
326: by $1,3,9,27$ and $81$.
327: The full lines of Fig.\ref{heat_flow} are obtained by
328: fitting the data to the form $r_E = c/t_w$, with the chosen value of $c$
329: minimizing the RMS distance to the data.
330:
331:
332: According to record dynamics~\cite{Sibani03,Sibani05}, the rate of quakes,
333: $r_q$ obeys
334: \begin{equation}
335: r_q(t_w) = \frac{\alpha(N)}{t_w},
336: \end{equation}
337: where $\alpha$ represents
338: the number of independent domains in the system,
339: which is linearly dependent on the system size $N$, but independent
340: of the temperature. The rate of energy flow depends on the
341: rate of quakes and on the amount of energy given off in each quake.
342: The latter could in principle depend on both temperature and age.
343: However, since panel \emph{(b)} of Fig. \ref{heat_flow} shows that
344: $r_E \propto 1/t_w$ to a good approximation, we conclude that
345: $r_E(t_w) = r_q(t_w) e(T)$,
346: where the average amount $e(T)$
347: of energy exchanged in a single quake is given by
348: \begin{equation}
349: e(T) = \frac{r_E \cdot t_w}{\alpha},
350: \label{energyperquake}
351: \end{equation}
352: which only depends on $T$.
353: \begin{figure}[t]
354: \centering
355: \mbox{
356: \subfigure[Reversible fluctuations]{\epsfig{figure=sigma_rev_vs_T.eps,width=.45\textwidth}} \quad
357: \subfigure[Activated behavior of $r_E$]{\epsfig{figure=rate_vs_T.eps,width=.47\textwidth}}} \quad
358: \caption{{\em (a)}: The standard deviation $\sigma_{rev}$ of the reversible energy fluctuations
359: is extracted from the Gaussian fit of the central part of the PDF data, and plotted
360: versus the temperature. The dotted line is a fit to the theoretical prediction
361: discussed in the main text. The data are based on $800$ independent
362: runs, taken in the interval $[1000,1500]$.
363: {\em (b)}: The average rate of flow, shifted as indicated, is
364: plotted logarithmically versus the inverse temperature. The straight
365: line part of the data corresponds to Arrhenius activated behavior.
366: These high precision data are based on $80000$ independent
367: runs, all taken in the interval $[1000,1500]$.
368: }
369: \label{heat_flow_vs_T}
370: \end{figure}
371: %figures data files in /home/paolo/bose/WTM/4SPINS/RUN_DIR/t1000-1500
372: %scripts in the directory: PDF fit.m makes panel a and ratefit.m makes panel b.
373:
374: Figure~\ref{heat_flow_vs_T} covers
375: the temperature dependence of the heat transport PDF
376: in the age interval $[1000-1500]$. Specifically, panel \emph{(a)}
377: covers the $T$ dependence of the Gaussian part of the PDF,
378: as described by the corresponding standard deviation
379: $\sigma_{rev}$, while panel \emph{(b)} covers the $T$ dependence
380: of the intermittent tail, as described by the rate $r_E$.
381:
382: In panel \emph{(a)} the dots are the standard deviation $\sigma_{rev}$ of the
383: reversible heat exchange fluctuations
384: obtained from the Gaussian part of the PDF.
385: The line is the theoretical prediction
386: obtained under two model assumptions:
387: \emph{(i)} reversible energy fluctuations are treated as thermal equilibrium fluctuations,
388: which \emph{(ii)} occur independently within the previously introduced
389: number $\alpha$ of thermalized
390: domains. These are characterized by an exponential local density of states,
391: ${\cal D}(e) \propto \exp(e/\epsilon)$. These assumptions lead, via standard
392: thermal equilibrium calculations, to the expression
393: \begin{equation}
394: \sigma_{rev} = \surd (2\alpha) \frac{\epsilon T}{\epsilon -T}; \quad T < \epsilon .
395: \label{reversible}
396: \end{equation}
397: The parameter $\epsilon$ marks
398: the upper limit of the temperature range
399: where the exponential density of states is physically
400: relevant (the attractor is thermally unstable and
401: physically irrelevant for $T \ge \epsilon$).
402: The pre-factor $\surd 2$ arises since $H$ is the difference of two
403: energy values, taken $\delta t$ apart. These values are
404: statistically independent, and the variance is correspondingly additive,
405: provided that $\delta t$ is sufficiently large, as is the case here.
406: Finally the pre-factor $\surd \alpha $ expresses the linear dependence
407: of the variance on the number $\alpha $ of (supposedly) equivalent
408: and independent domains.
409: The parameter values minimizing the RMS distance between data and Eq.~\ref{reversible}
410: are $\alpha=25$ and $\epsilon=3.8$. The domain
411: volume corresponding to $\alpha=25$ is $v = 16^3/25 \approx 162$ spins, whence the linear
412: size is, for a roughly cubic domain, close to $5$.
413: The $\epsilon$ value is a theoretical upper bound to the
414: thermal stability range, and safely exceeds $T=2.5$, the empirical upper temperature limit
415: to the aging regime.
416: Finally, using Eq.~\ref{energyperquake}, the value $\alpha \approx 25$ and the
417: available values of $r_E$, the average energy
418: exchanged in a quake, $e(T)$, turns out to vary from $-8.8$ to $-15$ when $T$ varies from $0.65$ to $2.35$.
419: In all cases $-e(T)>>T$, meaning that quakes are
420: thermally irreversible on the time scale at which the occur, a necessary
421: condition for record dynamics to apply~\cite{Sibani03,Sibani05,Sibani06}.
422: In summary, the procedure just described seems
423: preferable to e.g. a parabolic fit, which has nearly the same quality, but
424: requires one more parameter, without providing a physical interpretation.
425:
426: Panel \emph{(b)} of Fig.~\ref{heat_flow_vs_T} shows the temperature dependence
427: of the energy flow rate $r_E$ in the age interval $[1000-1500]$.
428: For fixed $t_w$
429: and $T\rightarrow 0$, $r_E$ approaches the value $\approx -0.172$.
430: The logarithm of the deviation $-r_E - 0.172$
431: is plotted in an Arrhenius fashion versus the reciprocal temperature $1/T$
432: (circles).
433: The full line in panel \emph{(b)} is
434: an Arrhenius fit within the restricted range of $T$
435: obtained by excluding the lowest temperatures, as indicated. The fit yields
436: an energy barrier of characteristic size $b\approx 3$. The modest activated contribution shows that
437: once initiated, a quake can cover more ground
438: the higher temperature, of course within the boundary of the aging regime.
439: The activated contribution explains why,
440: within a fixed amount of time, aging reaches
441: lower energies at higher temperatures (see e.g. Fig. \ref{aging_of_energy}).
442: In summary, the main contribution to the energy release is $T$ independent, but
443: the process is nevertheless enhanced by
444: an increased ability to climb small energy barriers.
445: \section{Discussion}
446: The heat exchange in the plaquette model
447: features both equilibrium-like fluctuations, the Gaussian
448: part of the PDF, and quakes, the exponential tail.
449: Crucially, as the Gaussian signal has zero average,
450: the energy outflow is exclusively due
451: to the quakes, which we interpret~\cite{Sibani05,Sibani03} as a
452: change from one metastable configuration to another,
453: having considerably lower energy.
454: The interpretation is explicitely verified in a numerical study of
455: the random orthogonal model~\cite{Crisanti04}, where energy changes from one inherent
456: state (IS)~\cite{Stillinger83} to another
457: care monitored. The processes
458: corresponding to the Gaussian and exponential parts of the PDF are
459: there called stimulated and spontaneous, respectively.
460:
461: As quakes are localized events in time and space,
462: record dynamics treats aging as a strongly
463: heterogeneous dynamical process.
464: However, as emphasized by
465: recent work~\cite{Mayer04,Appignanesi04,Pan05, Merolle05},
466: exponential tails in the PDF's of relevant dynamical variables
467: also appear outside the aging
468: regime (see also the insert of Fig.~\ref{aging_of_energy}), i.e.
469: heterogeneity is not exclusively associated to aging.
470:
471: Our analysis employs a record dynamics scenario~\cite{Sibani03,Sibani05},
472: where quakes are assumed to be irreversible, an assumption appropriate
473: far from equilibrium, and explicitely verified in the present model.
474: The scenario has been used to design a numerical exploration
475: technique~\cite{Dall03,Boettcher05}, melds, as we have seen,
476: real space (the mumber $\alpha$ of domains)
477: and `landscape' (the density of states of local attractors) properties of glassy dynamics,
478: and has a number of predictions
479: which can be tested numerically and/or experimentally.
480: The physical adjustments induced
481: by each quake affect all measurements. In principle, these aspects require a
482: separate modeling effort, which in our case is limited to
483: the temperature dependence of the average energy $e(T)$ exchanged in a single
484: quake.
485: More generally, by assuming that the induced changes are stochastic and
486: mutually independent, and that no rearrangement can occur
487: without a quake, approximate closed-form expressions
488: for the rate of change of any quantity of physical interest
489: can be obtained~\cite{Sibani06,Sibani06a}.
490: E.g., the configuration autocorrelation function
491: and the linear response between times $t_w$ and $t_w+t$ are predicted to scale with the
492: logarithm of the ratio $t/t_w$, as indeed observed~\cite{Sibani06,Castillo03,Chamon04}
493: in a number of cases.
494:
495: In the p-spin model, the average energy decays in logarithmic fashion,
496: a behavior also seen in spin-glasses~\cite{Sibani05}
497: and Lennard-Jones glasses~\cite{Angelani03}. In the latter case,
498: the rate of hopping between different minima basins
499: (arguably similar to our quakes, see also ref.\cite{Crisanti04} )
500: decreases as the reciprocal of the age.
501: Broadly similar behavior is observed, experimentally
502: or numerically, in a large number
503: of other complex systems~\cite{Lee05,Hannemann05,Oliveira05,Balankin05}.
504:
505:
506: Record dynamics sees aging as an entrenchment
507: into a hierarchy of metastable attractors with growing degree of stability.
508: It thus implies the existence of a hierarchy
509: of the sort explicitely built into `tree' models
510: of glassy relaxation~\cite{Sibani89,Hoffmann90,Sibani91,Joh96,Hoffmann97},
511: models which notably reproduce key features of glassy dynamics.
512: For such models, an entry in a hitherto unexplored subtree
513: requires a record-sized energy fluctuation. The converse statement,
514: which is assumed in record dynamics,
515: is only true for
516: a continuously branching tree, i.e. when the energy difference
517: between neighboring nodes tends to zero. In spite of these
518: mathematical difference, the physical picture behind record
519: dynamics and tree models is nearly the same. Note
520: that hierarchies are specifically associated
521: to locally thermalized and independently relaxing real space
522: domains.
523: The fit in Fig.~\ref{heat_flow_vs_T} simplistically assumes that,
524: within each of these, the number of configurations available
525: increases exponentially with the energy difference from the state of lowest
526: energy within the domain. The same property is built in
527: tree models, and leads~\cite{Grossmann85} to a
528: thermal instability when the temperature
529: approaches from below the characteristic scale of the exponential growth
530: ($\epsilon$ in our notation).
531: Nearly exponential local density of states have been found by a variety of numerical
532: techniques in a number of microscopic
533: models~\cite{Sibani93,Sibani94,Schon98,Klotz98,Schon00,Schon02,Schubert05},
534: providing independent evidence of the physical relevance of the approximation.
535:
536: In conclusion, intermittency data offer a unique
537: window into the microscopic dynamics of aging
538: systems, and open the possibility
539: of investigating issues of central
540: importance in the statistical physics of complex systems,
541: e.g. barriers and attractor basins, using calorimetric experiments.
542:
543: \section{Acknowledgments} Financial support from the Danish Natural Sciences Research Council
544: is gratefully acknowledged. The author is greatly indebted
545: to Stefan Boettcher for suggesting
546: this investigation and for his useful comments,
547: and to Karl Heinz Hoffmann, Henrik J. Jensen and Christian Sch\"{o}n for discussions.
548: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
549: \bibliography{SD-meld}
550: \end{document}
551:
552:
553:
554: