1: %LATEX FILE

2: 

3: \documentclass[aps,prb,twocolumn,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}

4: \usepackage{graphicx}

5: \usepackage{bm}

6: \usepackage{epsfig} 

7: \usepackage{amsfonts}

8: \usepackage{amsmath}

9: 

10: \allowdisplaybreaks[1] 

11: 

12: \newcommand*{\be}{\begin{equation}}

13: \newcommand*{\ee}{\end{equation}}

14: \newcommand*{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

15: \newcommand*{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

16: \newcommand*{\vs}[1]{\vspace{#1 mm}}

17: \newcommand*{\sd}{^{\dagger}}

18: \newcommand{\up}{\uparrow}

19: \newcommand{\down}{\downarrow}

20: \def\abs#1{| #1 |}

21: \def\bra#1{\langle #1|}

22: \def\ket#1{|#1\rangle}

23: \def\p{\partial}

24: 

25: \def\ii{\'{\i}}

26: 

27: 

28: \begin{document}

29: 

30: \title{The short-range correlations of a doped Mott insulator}

31: 

32: \author{Tiago C. Ribeiro}

33: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA}

34: \affiliation{Material Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA}

35: %\email{tribeiro@lbl.gov}

36: %authors from another affiliations

37: 

38: \date{\today}

39: 

40: \begin{abstract}

41: This paper presents numerical studies of the single hole $tt't''J$ model 

42: that address the interplay between the kinetic energy of itinerant 

43: electrons and the exchange energy of local moments as of interest 

44: to doped Mott insulators.

45: Due to this interplay, two different spin correlations coexist around

46: a mobile vacancy.

47: These \textit{local} correlations provide an effective two-band picture

48: that explains the two-band structure observed in various theoretical and 

49: experimental studies, the doping dependence of the momentum space

50: anisotropic pseudogap phenomena and the asymmetry between hole and 

51: electron doped cuprates.

52: \end{abstract}

53: 

54: %\pacs{74.72.-h,74.25.Jb,71.10.Fd}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy

55:                              % Classification Scheme.

56: 

57: \maketitle

58: 

59: 

60: 

61: \section{\label{sec:intro}Introduction} 

62: 

63: The evolution between the weakly correlated Fermi metal and the strongly 

64: coupled Mott insulator is a major and long-standing problem in the

65: field of condensed matter physics. \cite{M4916, A5902, H6338}

66: It concerns a vast list of material compounds \cite{IF9839} where the 

67: local character of $d$ and $f$ orbitals enhances the electron effective 

68: mass together with the role of the electron-electron Coulomb repulsive 

69: interaction.

70: The resulting competition between the small kinetic energy and the 

71: strong interaction may lead itinerant electrons in the metallic

72: state to form local moments in the Mott insulating state. \cite{M4916}

73: In this paper, I focus on the interplay between such itinerant and 

74: localized electrons.

75: 

76: The generalized-$tJ$ model explicitly embodies the above interplay.

77: Indeed, ``$t$'' stands for the kinetic energy term of itinerant charge 

78: carriers and ``$J$'' stands for the interaction term between localized 

79: spins.

80: The intricacy of this model follows from the mutual frustration 

81: between these two terms. 

82: Specifically, the $J > 0$ term favors a staggered moment spin background 

83: that constrains the motion of vacancies, while the $t$ term moves electrons

84: around and, thus, reshuffles and destroys the underlying 

85: antiferromagnetic (AF) spin pattern.

86: The two-dimensional (2D) $tt't''J$ model, which this paper addresses, 

87: is especially interesting because the compromise between the 

88: spin exchange and hole kinetic energies is particularly subtle in 

89: the parameter regime of interest to real materials, such as the 

90: high-temperature superconducting cuprates. \cite{A8796,D9463,LN0617}

91: 

92: Following the recent improvement in computational resources, experimental 

93: resolution and sample quality, various non-trivial results have illuminated 

94: our understanding of 2D doped Mott insulators.

95: It is exciting to note that many of these results are consistently

96: obtained by different theoretical approaches and by experiments.

97: For instance, a variety of numerical and analytical studies show that

98: the electronic spectrum below the chemical potential has a robust

99: two-band structure and that changing the electron density 

100: redistributes the spectral weight in a momentum dependent way.

101: \cite{PH9544,MH9545,DZ0016,GE0036,TS0009,T0417,RW0501,KK0614,PB0402,CC0502}

102: Similar conclusions apply to the two dispersive features displayed by

103: angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) on the cuprates.

104: \cite{RS0301,KS0318,YZ0301,SR0402,DS0373}

105: Since the electron dynamics in strongly correlated systems follows

106: from the local environment around the carriers, \cite{SHORTRANGE}

107: %\footnote{

108: %This statement finds support in various theoretical and experimental

109: %results. 

110: %For instance:

111: %\textit{(i)} analytical methods show that AF correlations suppress 

112: %\textit{inter}-sublattice hopping \cite{KL8980,RV8893,MH9117,RH9808}  

113: %while certain spin liquid correlations suppress 

114: %\textit{intra}-sublattice processes instead; \cite{RW0301}

115: %\textit{(ii)} exact diagonalization, \cite{MH9545} quantum Monte Carlo 

116: %\cite{PH9544}, cluster perturbation theory \cite{ST0401} and 

117: %cellular dynamical mean-field theory \cite{KK0614,KK0606} show how electronic 

118: %spectral features keep track of the underlying local correlations;

119: %\textit{(iii)} the ubiquituous flat bands observed in the cuprates 

120: %around $(\pi,0)$ \cite{KS9498} follow from the local spin correlations

121: %as well; \cite{DN9428,RW0531}

122: %\textit{(iv)} AF correlations renormalize the cuprate nodal 

123: %dispersion width down to $\approx 2.2J$. 

124: %\cite{RS0301,KS0318,SR0402,DS0373,KW9845,TY0403,D9463,TS0009}

125: %}

126: the above two-band structure reflects the presence of two local 

127: correlations, which arise due to the interplay between itinerant 

128: electrons and local moments. 

129: 

130: This paper explores the microscopic origin of the above short-range

131: correlations and, thus, of the aforementioned

132: two-band structure that appears in both theory and experiments.

133: Specifically, in Sec. \ref{sec:local} the exact diagonalization and 

134: the self-consistent Born approximation techniques are employed

135: to study the single hole problem in the $tt't''J$ model.

136: I show that the interplay between the ``$t$'' and ``$J$'' terms 

137: of the Hamiltonian translates into the coexistence of two different types 

138: of spin correlations around the vacancy --

139: one type is driven by the kinetic energy term and the other by the 

140: exchange energy term.

141: These short-range correlations, which follow from purely

142: local energetic considerations and whose properties are studied in

143: Sec. \ref{sec:properties}, underlie a diverse set of non-trivial 

144: and, by now, well established properties of 2D doped Mott 

145: insulators.

146: These include the doping dependence of the pseudogap dispersion and of 

147: the pseudogap momentum space spectral weight distribution, 

148: \cite{DS0373,ZY0401,YZ0301,RS0301,KF0517,TY0403,AR0201} as 

149: well as the asymmetry between the hole and electron doped regimes of the 

150: cuprate compounds (Sec. \ref{sec:anisotropy}). 

151: \cite{DS0373,KW9845,YZ0301,RS0301,AR0201,TM9496,T0417,RW0501,KK0614}

152: 

153: 

154: 

155: \section{\label{sec:local}Two local correlations}

156: 

157: \subsection{\label{subsec:model}The model system}

158: 

159: The single hole 2D $tt't''J$ Hamiltonian is

160: \be

161: H_{tt't''J} = - \sum_{\langle ij \rangle, \sigma} t_{ij} \left(

162: \widetilde{c}_{i,\sigma}\sd \widetilde{c}_{j,\sigma} + H.c.\right) +

163: \sum_{\langle ij \rangle} J_{ij} \bm{S}_i.\bm{S}_j

164: \label{eq:Htj}

165: \ee

166: where $\widetilde{c}_{i,\sigma}$ is the constrained electron 

167: operator $\widetilde{c}_{i,\sigma} = c_{i,\sigma} (1-n_{i,-\sigma})$.

168: $t_{ij}$ equals $t$, $t'$ and $t''$ for first, second and third 

169: nearest-neighbor (NN) sites respectively and vanishes otherwise.

170: The exchange interaction only involves NN spins for 

171: which $J_{ij}=J$.

172: In this paper $J \in [0.2 , 0.8]$ (units are set so that $t=1$),

173: which includes the experimentally relevant regime $J\approx0.4$.

174: The calculations are not extended down to $J=0$ because, in that limit,

175: the hole is subjected to the Nagaoka instability \cite{N6692} and, thus,

176: the physics for $J\approx0$ is specific to such a regime and is not 

177: relevant to materials like the cuprates. \cite{WA0111}

178: The calculations for $J>0.8$ do not change the argument below nor

179: the consequent conclusions.

180: 

181: As mentioned in Sec. \ref{sec:intro}, this paper addresses the

182: electron dynamics as probed by the electron spectral function.

183: Its focus does not lie in the full details of the

184: spectral function line shape, but rather on the fact that the 

185: electronic spectrum displays two separate dispersive features below 

186: the Fermi level.

187: This work also concerns the momentum distribution of electron 

188: spectral weight, which displays distinct behavior in separate 

189: regions of the Brillouin zone, namely the regions around 

190: $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ and $(\pi,0)$.

191: The above facts encode short time and short length scale physics.

192: Hence, within the above context, it is relevant to study 

193: small lattice systems and,

194: unless otherwise stated, all the results below come from the exact 

195: diagonalization of $H_{tt't''J}$ on a $4 \times 4$ lattice.

196: The exact diagonalization analysis is further substantiated by results

197: from the self-consistent Born approximation approach to the 

198: spinless-fermion Schwinger-boson representation of the $tJ$ model 

199: \cite{RV8893,MH9117,RH9808} on a $16 \times 16$ lattice.

200: 

201: 

202: \subsection{\label{subsec:onehole}One-hole states}

203: 

204: There exist two extreme limits where the interplay between 

205: itinerant electrons and local moments occurs, namely the one where:

206: \textit{(i)} most electrons are itinerant and the corresponding

207: Fermi energy is the highest energy scale in the problem;

208: \textit{(ii)} most electrons form local moments and the system

209: reduces to a lattice of spins with a few mobile vacancies.

210: The former case is captured by the well understood Kondo model, which

211: addresses how the Fermi sea accommodates the presence of a local moment.

212: \cite{W7573} 

213: The second case, which is of interest close to the Mott insulator 

214: transition, differs from the standard Kondo lattice problem since the 

215: spin-spin interaction is larger than the itinerant electrons' Fermi 

216: energy. \cite{RW0674}

217: In this case, it is rather convenient to consider how the spin background 

218: adjusts to the presence of a hole. 

219: 

220: Hence, in what follows, one studies the lowest energy configurations 

221: of the spin background around a single vacancy.

222: In particular, one considers the lowest energy single hole state

223: $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t't,''}$ for each momentum $\bm{k}$, where

224: $J$, $t'$ and $t''$ label the model parameters that define

225: the corresponding Hamiltonian $H_{tt't''J}$. 

226: This state can fall into two categories -- it either has zero

227: or non-zero quasiparticle spectral weight

228: $\left| \bra{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''} \widetilde{c}_{\bm{k},\sigma} 

229: \ket{\text{HF GS}} \right|^2$, where $\ket{\text{HF GS}}$ denotes the 

230: groundstate of the half-filled system.

231: For all $\bm{k}$, $t'$ and $t''$ there exists a certain

232: $J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$ such that $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$

233: has zero quasiparticle spectral weight if and only if 

234: $J \leq J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$.

235: The intuition behind this result is that for $J/t \gg 1$ the large

236: spin stiffness renders the spin background robust to the hole motion,

237: while for small enough $J/t$ the soft AF spin configuration is 

238: dramatically modified by the doped hole

239: (the Nagaoka instability \cite{N6692} perfectly illustrates this last 

240: case).

241: If $J \leq J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$ one denotes 

242: $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t't,''}$ by $\ket{\widetilde{U}_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$

243: (hence, by definition, $\ket{\widetilde{U}_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$

244: has vanishing quasiparticle spectral weight).

245: If, instead, $J > J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$ the single hole state

246: $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t't,''}$ can be approximately recast

247: as

248: \begin{align}

249: \ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''} \ &\cong \ q(\bm{k},J,t',t'') 

250: \ket{Q_{\bm{k}},t',t''} + \notag \\

251: & \quad \quad + u(\bm{k},J,t',t'') \ket{U_{\bm{k}},t',t''}

252: \label{eq:decomp}

253: \end{align}

254: where $\ket{Q_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$ and $\ket{U_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$ 

255: are orthonormal states (to be defined below) that do \textit{not} 

256: depend on $J$, \cite{Utilde}

257: %\footnote{

258: %Note the difference between the kets $\ket{\widetilde{U}_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$

259: %and $\ket{U_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$.

260: %The former is $J$-\textit{dependent} and is defined for 

261: %$J < J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$.

262: %The latter is $J$-\textit{independent} and is defined for 

263: %$J > J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$.

264: %Similar notation is used for both states since they have 

265: %similar properties in the parameter regime of interest to 

266: %the cuprates (see Sec. \ref{sec:properties}).

267: %}

268: while $q(\bm{k},J,t',t'')$ and $u(\bm{k},J,t',t'')$

269: are $J$-dependent coefficients that obey the normalization condition

270: $\left|q(\bm{k},J,t',t'')\right|^2 +

271: \left|u(\bm{k},J,t',t'')\right|^2 = 1$.

272: Eq. \eqref{eq:decomp}, which applies in a large range of 

273: $J$ values, is a major result in this paper.

274: It implies that, in a large interval of values of 

275: $J > J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$, the eigenstates 

276: $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t't,''}$ define a line parameterized by $J$ 

277: which approximately lies in a 2D plane in the single hole $tt't''J$ 

278: model Hilbert space.

279: The physical content of this statement, 

280: together with evidence supporting Eq. \eqref{eq:decomp}, are 

281: presented below.

282: 

283: \begin{table}

284: \begin{ruledtabular}

285: \begin{tabular*}{\hsize}{cc|cccccc}

286: %\hline

287: & J & 0.3 & 0.4 & 0.5 & 0.6 & 0.7 & 0.8 \\

288: \hline

289: & $(\tfrac{\pi}{2},\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ & 0.9994 & 0.9994 & 0.9998 & 1 & 0.9998 & 0.9990 \\ 

290: $t'=0$ & $(\pi,0)$ & 0.9994 & 0.9994 & 0.9998 & 1 & 0.9998 & 0.9990 \\

291: $t''=0$ & $(\pi,\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ & 0.9972 & 0.9977 & 0.9993 & 1 & 0.9992 & 0.9970 \\

292: ED & $(\tfrac{\pi}{2},0)$ & 0.9975 & 0.9980 & 0.9994 & 1 & 0.9994 & 0.9977 \\

293: & $(0,0)$ & 0.9946 & 0.9923 & 0.9963 & 1 & 0.9938 & 0.9766 \\ 

294: \hline

295: & $(\tfrac{\pi}{2},\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ & 0.9996 & 0.9996 & 0.9998 & 1 & 0.9998 & 0.9990 \\ 

296: $t'=0$ & $(\pi,0)$ & 0.9994 & 0.9994 & 0.9998 & 1 & 0.9997 & 0.9986 \\ 

297: $t''=0$ & $(\pi,\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ & 0.9989 & 0.9988 & 0.9996 & 1 & 0.9995 & 0.9978 \\

298: SCBA & $(\tfrac{\pi}{2},0)$ & 0.9989 & 0.9988 & 0.9996 & 1 & 0.9995 & 0.9978 \\

299: & $(0,0)$ & 0.9016 & 0.9005 & 0.9766 & 1 & 0.9842 & 0.9488 \\ 

300: \hline

301:  & $(\tfrac{\pi}{2},\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ & 0.9994 & 0.9994 & 0.9998 & 1 & 0.9998 & 0.9990 \\ 

302: $t'=-0.2$ & $(\pi,0)$ & -- & 1  & 0.9998 & 0.9997 & 0.9999 & 1 \\

303: $t''=0.1$ & $(\pi,\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ & 0.9936 & 0.9952 & 0.9986 & 1 & 0.9987 & 0.9950 \\

304: ED & $(\tfrac{\pi}{2},0)$ & 0.9907 & 0.9943 & 0.9986 & 1 & 0.9988 & 0.9957 \\

305: & $(0,0)$ & 0.9880 & 0.9856 & 0.9943 & 1 & 0.9940 & 0.9807 \\ 

306: %\hline

307: \end{tabular*}

308: \end{ruledtabular}

309: \caption

310: {\label{tab:check2d} Square of the overlap of 

311: $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$ with the Hilbert space 

312: $\{ \ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J=0.2,t',t''}, \ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J=0.6,t',t''} \}$

313: for different $J$ and $\bm{k}$. 

314: Both exact diagonalization (ED) and self-consistent Born approximation (SCBA) 

315: results are shown for $t',t''=0$.

316: Exact diagonalization results are also shown for $t'=-0.2$, $t''=0.1$.

317: For $t'=-0.2$, $t''=0.1$ and $\bm{k}=(\pi,0)$ the Hilbert space 

318: $\{\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J=0.4,t',t''}, \ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J=0.8,t',t''} \}$

319: is used instead.}

320: \end{table}

321: 

322: If $t',t''=0$ then $J_c(\bm{k},t'=0,t''=0) < 0.2$ for all $\bm{k}$ in 

323: Table \ref{tab:check2d}.

324: This table shows that for all $J \in [0.2 , 0.8]$, as well as 

325: for all depicted momenta $\bm{k}$,

326: the states $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t'=0,t''=0}$

327: have almost unit overlap with the 2D Hilbert space

328: $\{\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J=0.2,t=0',t''=0}, 

329: \ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J=0.6,t'=0,t''=0} \}$.

330: This conclusion is further substantiated by the self-consistent Born 

331: approximation technique on a $16\times 16$ lattice (see

332: Table \ref{tab:check2d}), thus showing that 

333: the above result is not specific to the $4\times 4$ lattice used in 

334: the exact diagonalization calculation. \cite{CHOICE}

335: %\footnote{

336: %The above choice of $J=0.2$ and $J=0.6$ could have been made different.

337: %However, any reasonable set of two values of $J$ in the range

338: %$[0.2 , 0.8]$ would lead to similar conclusions.

339: %}

340: A very similar observation holds when $t',t'' \neq 0$, as 

341: Table \ref{tab:check2d} illustrates for $t'=-0.2$, $t''=0.1$.

342: The only difference between the above $t',t''=0$ and $t'=-0.2$, $t''=0.1$

343: cases is that $J_c(\bm{k}=(\pi,0),t'=0, t''=0) < 0.2$

344: while $0.3 < J_c(\bm{k}=(\pi,0),t'=-0.2, t''=0.1) < 0.4$.

345: Since the approximate equality in Eq. \eqref{eq:decomp} only applies for

346: $J > J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$, in Table \ref{tab:check2d} one uses the 2D 

347: Hilbert space $\{\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}=(\pi,0)},J=0.4,t'=-0.2, t''=0.1}, 

348: \ket{\psi_{\bm{k}=(\pi,0)},J=0.8,t'=-0.2, t''=0.1} \}$

349: to illustrate that Eq. \eqref{eq:decomp} also applies when 

350: $\bm{k}=(\pi,0)$ and $t'=-0.2$, $t''=0.1$.

351: 

352: The above numerical results show that Eq. \eqref{eq:decomp} 

353: is a very good approximation for a wide range of 

354: values of the exchange coupling $J$. \cite{WIDERANGE}

355: %\footnote{

356: %The width of the interval of $J$ values displayed in 

357: %Table \ref{tab:check2d}, namely $[0.2 , 0.8]$, is of the 

358: %order of the maximum $J$ value.

359: %}

360: However, one is still free to choose any orthonormal pair of states 

361: $\ket{Q_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$ and $\ket{U_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$

362: in the 2D Hilbert space used as a reference.

363: A physically sensible choice comes from requiring

364: $q(\bm{k},J,t',t'')$ to monotonously increase with $J/t$  

365: [thus $u(\bm{k},J,t',t'')$ monotonously decreases with $J/t$].

366: Since cranking up $J$ enhances the quasiparticle features of doped 

367: carriers, \cite{MH9117} the above condition is automatically satisfied 

368: if $\ket{U_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$ has vanishing quasiparticle spectral weight. 

369: This prescription uniquely determines Q states 

370: ($\ket{Q_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$) and U states ($\ket{U_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$)

371: which, one should note, are not eigenstates 

372: of $H_{tt't''J}$. \cite{SINGLEJ}

373: %\footnote{

374: %As it follows from the approximate equality in Eq. \eqref{eq:decomp}, 

375: %the states $\ket{Q_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$ and $\ket{U_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$ 

376: %are relatively insensitive to variations of the two values

377: %of $J$ used to define the above mentioned 2D plane in the 

378: %single hole $tt't''J$ model Hilbert space.

379: %In the limit where these two values of $J$ become infinitesimally close

380: %to each other, $\ket{Q_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$ and $\ket{U_{\bm{k}},t',t''}$

381: %are constructed from the state vectors

382: %$\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$ and $\p \ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}/ \p J$.

383: %Therefore, one can determine a pair of Q and U states

384: %for every single value of $J > J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$.

385: %}

386: The above construction implies that Q states bear the electron-like

387: properties of the true eigenstates $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t't,''}$ and,

388: indeed, for all values of $t'$ and $t''$ used throughout this paper

389: one has that

390: $0.5 \lesssim

391: \frac{|\bra{Q_{\bm{k}}} \widetilde{c}_{\bm{k},\sigma} \ket{\text{HF GS}}|^2}

392: {|\bra{\text{HF GS}} \widetilde{c}_{\bm{k},\sigma}\sd 

393: \widetilde{c}_{\bm{k},\sigma} \ket{\text{HF GS}}|} \lesssim 0.8$

394: in the momentum space region around the $(\pi,0)-(0,\pi)$ 

395: line. \cite{MBZB}

396: %\footnote{

397: %This is the region where the lowest eigenstates lie and whose

398: %properties one is more concerned about.

399: %}

400: 

401: \begin{figure}

402: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{spin_back.eps}

403: \caption{\label{fig:spin}

404: (a) $S_{\bm{k}}^Q(\bm{i})$ and (b) $S_{\bm{k}}^U(\bm{i})$ 

405: where $\bm{i}$ is the distance to the vacancy (black square at the 

406: center), $\bm{k}=(\tfrac{\pi}{2},\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ and $t',t''=0$.

407: Different $\bm{k}$, $t'$ and $t''$ lead to qualitatively similar 

408: conclusions, as seen in Fig. \ref{fig:staggered}.

409: }

410: \end{figure}

411: 

412: The previous argument clarifies how the spin background adjusts to 

413: the presence of a moving hole.

414: Specifically, spins show two different types of correlations -- one 

415: type is enhanced upon increasing $J/t$ and the other becomes more 

416: pronounced when $J/t$ is reduced.

417: By definition, Q and U states capture these correlations and,

418: not surprisingly, they display distinct physical properties.

419: Simply based on the above energetic considerations, one expects

420: the former states to retain the AF correlations of the 

421: undoped system, while the doping induced spin correlations in U states 

422: facilitate hole hopping.

423: The analysis in Sec. \ref{subsec:r_and_k} confirms

424: this microscopic picture.

425: In principle, a similar construction 

426: applies to models other than the 2D $tt't''J$ model.

427: The significant fact about this model is that, for experimentally 

428: relevant parameters, the overlap of both Q and U states with 

429: $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$ is large and exhibits a 

430: considerable momentum dependence (see Sec. \ref{sec:anisotropy}). \cite{3D}

431: %\footnote{

432: %The above formal construction to derive Q and U states can be applied,

433: %for instance, to the 3D $tt't''J$ model.

434: %However, in that case, U states are expected to be less relevant

435: %since AF correlations, which are more robust in 3D,

436: %lead to strong quasiparticle properties throughout the Brillouin zone.

437: %}

438: 

439: 

440: 

441: \section{\label{sec:properties}Properties of the local correlations}

442: 

443: The construction in Sec. \ref{subsec:onehole} identifies two

444: different spin configurations that coexist around a mobile

445: vacancy.

446: It also provides a recipe to separately obtain these

447: configurations and, thus, to study their properties. 

448: 

449: 

450: \subsection{\label{subsec:r_and_k}Real and momentum space properties}

451: 

452: \begin{figure}

453: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{Rspace.eps}

454: \caption

455: {\label{fig:staggered}

456: $\widetilde{S}_{\bm{k}}^Q(\nu)$ (left panels) 

457: and $\widetilde{S}_{\bm{k}}^U(\nu)$ (right panels) 

458: for different momenta $\bm{k}$.

459: (a) and (b) $t'=-0.3, t''=0.2$. 

460: (c) and (d) $t',t''=0$.

461: (e) and (f) $t'=0.3, t''=-0.2$. 

462: }

463: \end{figure}

464: 

465: First, consider the average spin density pattern around the hole

466: \be

467: S_{\bm{k}}^Y(\bm{i})\equiv\bra{Y_{\bm{k}}} \sum_j S_{j+i}^z 

468: \widetilde{c}_{j,-1/2} \widetilde{c}_{j,-1/2}\sd \ket{Y_{\bm{k}}} 

469: \label{eq:spin_density}

470: \ee

471: for both $Y=Q$ and $Y=U$.

472: Fig. \ref{fig:spin} illustrates how different the spin background

473: is in Q and U states for 

474: $\bm{k}=(\tfrac{\pi}{2},\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ and $t',t''=0$.

475: The former preserve an evident staggered pattern while the latter

476: display an almost uniform distribution of the spin-1/2 introduced

477: in the system upon doping.

478: To show that this picture remains valid for other values of $\bm{k}$, 

479: $t'$ and $t''$, take the average of the staggered magnetization over 

480: the hole's $\nu^{th}$ NN sites: 

481: $\widetilde{S}_{\bm{k}}^Y(\nu) \equiv 

482: - \langle(-)^{i_x+i_y}S_{\bm{k}}^Y(\bm{i})\rangle_{\nu} - 

483: \tfrac{1}{N-1}\tfrac{1}{2}$

484: (here $Y=Q,U$). \cite{AVERAGE_S}

485: %\footnote{

486: %The average magnetization

487: %$\tfrac{1}{N-1}\sum_j \langle S_j^z \rangle = \tfrac{1}{N-1}\tfrac{1}{2}$, 

488: %where $N$ is the number of lattice sites, is subtracted to reduce 

489: %finite size effects.

490: %}

491: Figs. \ref{fig:staggered}(a), \ref{fig:staggered}(c) and 

492: \ref{fig:staggered}(e) show that for different $\bm{k}$, $t'$ and $t''$

493: the doped hole in Q states coexists with the staggered 

494: spin pattern inherited from the undoped system.

495: This state of affairs is in sharp contrast with the results for

496: U states, where the AF spin pattern of the undoped system is destroyed 

497: and the staggered magnetization around the hole 

498: is close zero and even negative

499: [Figs. \ref{fig:staggered}(b), \ref{fig:staggered}(d) and 

500: \ref{fig:staggered}(f)].

501: One can check that a similar conclusion holds for

502: $\widetilde{\text{U}}$ states [these are the energy 

503: eigenfunctions $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$ when 

504: $J<J_c({\bm{k}},t',t'')$].

505: 

506: \begin{table}

507: \begin{ruledtabular}

508: \begin{tabular*}{\hsize}{c|cc|cc|}

509: %\hline

510: & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$t'=-0.3; t''=0.2$} &

511: \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$t'=0.3; t''=-0.2$} \\

512: %\hline

513: $\bm{k}$ & $(\pi,0)$ & $(0,0)$ & $(\tfrac{\pi}{2},\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ & $(0,0)$ \\

514: %\hline

515: $\bm{q}=(0,0)$ & 0.0329 & 0.0343 & 0.0164 & 0.0328 \\

516: %\hline

517: $\bm{q}=(\pi,\pi)$ & 0.5437 & 0.6051 & 0.5293 & 0.5141 \\

518: %\hline

519: \end{tabular*}

520: \end{ruledtabular}

521: \caption

522: {\label{tab:MD} 

523: $\sum_{\bm{q}}' n_{\bm{k}}^{\widetilde{U}}(\bm{q},+\tfrac{1}{2})\equiv

524: \sum_{\bm{q}}'\bra{\widetilde{U}_{\bm{k}}}

525: \widetilde{c}_{-\bm{q},-\tfrac{1}{2}} 

526: \widetilde{c}_{-\bm{q},-\tfrac{1}{2}}\sd  \ket{\widetilde{U}_{\bm{k}}}$.

527: $\bm{q}=(0,0)$ results involve sum over $\bm{q}=(0,0)$,

528: $\bm{q}=(\pm\tfrac{\pi}{2},0)$ and $\bm{q}=(0,\pm\tfrac{\pi}{2})$.

529: $\bm{q}=(\pi,\pi)$ results involve sum over $\bm{q}=(\pi,\pi)$,

530: $\bm{q}=(\pm\tfrac{\pi}{2},\pi)$ and $\bm{q}=(\pi,\pm\tfrac{\pi}{2})$.

531: The model parameters used are relevant to both hole doped cuprates

532: ($J=0.4$, $t'=-0.3$, $t''=0.2$) and electron doped cuprates

533: ($J=0.4$, $t'=0.3$, $t''=-0.2$). \cite{TM0017}

534: }

535: \end{table}

536: 

537: In order to complement the above real space picture, 

538: one also considers the hole momentum distribution function

539: \be 

540: n_{\bm{k}}^Y(\bm{q},\sigma)\equiv\bra{Y_{\bm{k}}} 

541: \widetilde{c}_{-\bm{q},-\sigma} \widetilde{c}_{-\bm{q},-\sigma}\sd  

542: \ket{Y_{\bm{k}}}

543: \label{eq:hole_momentum}

544: \ee

545: for $Y=Q,U$.

546: Since Q states bear an electron-like character, the hole momentum 

547: distribution function

548: $n_{\bm{k}}^Q(\bm{q},+\tfrac{1}{2})$ is peaked at 

549: $\bm{q}=\bm{k}$. 

550: A smaller peak is also observed at $\bm{q}=\bm{k}+(\pi,\pi)$ due 

551: to the strong AF correlations. \cite{EO9541}

552: In U states, the hole strongly interacts with the surrounding spins 

553: and, as a result, the hole momentum distribution function 

554: $n_{\bm{k}}^U(\bm{q},+\tfrac{1}{2})$ peaks around 

555: $\bm{q}=(\pi,\pi)$ for all momenta $\bm{k}$ [Fig. \ref{fig:bands} (a)].

556: Table \ref{tab:MD} illustrates that the hole density in

557: $\widetilde{\text{U}}$ states also peaks around $(\pi,\pi)$ 

558: independently of the momentum $\bm{k}$.

559: 

560: The above results confirm that Q states capture the AF 

561: correlations that persist around the vacancy away from

562: half-filling.

563: This is expected since these states have a well defined 

564: quasiparticle character.

565: A remarkably different picture holds for the U and 

566: $\widetilde{\text{U}}$ states, whose quasiparticle spectral weight

567: vanishes.

568: As the above spin density results indicate, the spin correlations

569: in these states spread the extra $S^z=\tfrac{1}{2}$ away from the vacancy.

570: The resulting loss of spin exchange energy is accompanied by a gain in 

571: the hole kinetic energy, as it follows from

572: the hole momentum distribution results which support that, in these

573: states, the hole always lies around the bare band bottom 

574: [which is located at $(\pi,\pi)$]. 

575: This evidence resembles predictions from spin-charge separation scenarios. 

576: Indeed, within the slave-boson \cite{LN9221,WL9603,LN0617} 

577: and the doped-carrier frameworks, \cite{RW0501,RW0674}

578: the electron decays into a charged spinless boson, which condenses at 

579: $(\pi,\pi)$, and a spin-1/2 chargeless fermion, which 

580: carries the remaining momentum. 

581: The above calculations determine the equal time correlations probed by the

582: quantities in Eq. \eqref{eq:spin_density} and Eq. \eqref{eq:hole_momentum}

583: in a small lattice 

584: and, thus, cannot prove the existence (or lack thereof) of true 

585: spin-charge separation.

586: Still, they support that, in U and $\widetilde{\text{U}}$ 

587: states, the lattice spins screen the hole in conformity with 

588: short-range aspects of spin-charge separation phenomenology.

589: 

590: \begin{figure}

591: \includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{bands_merged_Kspace.eps}

592: \caption

593: {\label{fig:bands}

594: (a) $\sum_{\bm{q}}' n_{\bm{k}}^U(\bm{q},+\tfrac{1}{2})$.

595: Empty symbols involve sum over $\bm{q}=(\pi,\pi)$,

596: $\bm{q}=(\pm\tfrac{\pi}{2},\pi)$ and $\bm{q}=(\pi,\pm\tfrac{\pi}{2})$.

597: Full symbols involve sum over $\bm{q}=(0,0)$,

598: $\bm{q}=(\pm\tfrac{\pi}{2},0)$ and $\bm{q}=(0,\pm\tfrac{\pi}{2})$.

599: (b)-(d) Dispersion relations for $\ket{Q_{\bm{k}}}$

600: (full line), $\ket{U_{\bm{k}}}$ (dashed line) and $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}}}$

601: (dash-dot line). Upper, middle and lower set of dispersions are obtained

602: for $J$ equal to $0.2$, $0.4$ and $0.7$ respectively.

603: ($\circ$) indicates the best energy obtained by a linear combination of

604: $\ket{Q_{\bm{k}}}$ and $\ket{U_{\bm{k}}}$ when $J<J_c(\bm{k},t',t'')$ 

605: (in which case $\ket{\psi_{\bm{k}}} = \ket{\widetilde{U}_{\bm{k}},J,t',t''}$).

606: }

607: \end{figure}

608: 

609: 

610: \subsection{\label{subsec:renorm}Effect on electron dynamics}

611: 

612: The different hopping terms in the $tt't''J$ model Hamiltonian 

613: [Eq. \eqref{eq:Htj}] move electrons between first, second and third 

614: NN sites under the no-double-occupancy constraint.

615: These processes may or may not be restrained by the surrounding spin 

616: correlations. \cite{PROBE}

617: %\footnote{ 

618: %This is the reason why electronic spectral properties provide 

619: %an indirect probe of the local correlations \cite{SHORTRANGE}.

620: %}

621: For instance, NN hopping is frustrated by the two-sublattice 

622: structure of AF correlations.

623: Intra-sublattice hopping processes are, however, consistent

624: with the staggered pattern of AF correlations which, thus, do

625: not strongly renormalize $t'$ and $t''$. \cite{RENORM}

626: %\footnote{

627: %As shown in Ref. \onlinecite{TM0017}, the hole dispersion in

628: %the $tt't''J$ model along $(\pi,0)-(0,\pi)$ is controlled by 

629: %$t' \approx -2t''$ and is a factor $\sim 2-3$ smaller than

630: %expected from the bare parameters.

631: %This is to be contrasted with the nodal dispersion width which

632: %goes from the bare value $8t$ down to $2.2J$ due to AF spin

633: %correlations. \cite{D9463,TM0017,KL8980,MH9117,DS0373}

634: %In the parameter regime of interest to the cuprates this corresponds

635: %to a renormalization by a factor of $\sim 10$.

636: %}

637: 

638: \begin{table}

639: \begin{ruledtabular}

640: \begin{tabular*}{\hsize}{ccccccc}

641: %\hline

642: $t'$ & $t''$ & $\Delta E^{\psi}$ & $\Delta E^Q$ & $\Delta E^U$ &

643: $W_{\bm{k'}}^Q$ & $W_{\bm{k''}}^Q$ 

644: \\

645: \hline

646: -0.3 & 0.2 & 0.69 & 1.43 & 0.22 & 0 & 0.75 \\

647: %\hline

648: -0.2 & 0.1 & 0.56 & 0.92 & 0.14 & 0.45 & 0.72 \\

649: %\hline

650: %-0.1 & 0.05 & 0.30 & 0.33 & 0.30 & 0.63 & 0.69 \\

651: %\hline

652: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0.66 & 0.66 \\

653: %\hline

654: %0.1 & -0.05 & -0.35 & -0.37 & -0.09 & 0.71 & 0.65 \\

655: %\hline

656: 0.2 & -0.1 & -0.75 & -1.08 & -0.10 & 0.76 & 0.50 \\

657: %\hline

658: 0.3 & -0.2 & -0.80 & -2.33 & -0.29 & 0.82 & 0 \\

659: %\hline

660: \end{tabular*}

661: \end{ruledtabular}

662: \caption{\label{tab:pseudogap}

663: $\Delta E^Q$, $\Delta E^U$, $\Delta E^{\psi}$ and

664: $W_{\bm{k}}^Q$ with $\bm{k}=\bm{k'} \equiv (\pi,0)$

665: and $\bm{k}=\bm{k''} \equiv (\tfrac{\pi}{2},\tfrac{\pi}{2})$ for several 

666: $t'$ and $t''$ and $J=0.4$.}

667: \end{table}

668: 

669: The way the spin correlations in U states renormalize $t$, $t'$ and $t''$

670: is strikingly different though.

671: Firstly, these correlations are induced as a way to enhance NN hopping.

672: Secondly, they heavily renormalize $t'$ and $t''$.

673: To establish the latter fact, consider the hole dispersion in Q states

674: $E_{\bm{k}}^Q\equiv\bra{Q_{\bm{k}}}H_{tt't''J}\ket{Q_{\bm{k}}}$ and

675: the hole dispersion in U states

676: $E_{\bm{k}}^U\equiv\bra{U_{\bm{k}}}H_{tt't''J}\ket{U_{\bm{k}}}$.

677: Table \ref{tab:pseudogap} displays how the dispersion width between

678: $(\pi,0)$ and $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ changes with $t'$ and $t''$  for both 

679: Q states ($\Delta E^Q\equiv E_{(\pi,0)}^Q-E_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^Q$) and U 

680: states ($\Delta E^U\equiv E_{(\pi,0)}^U-E_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^U$). \cite{FLAT}

681: %\footnote{

682: %The fact that this width vanishes for $t',t''=0$ is an artifact of

683: %the $4\times4$ lattice. \cite{dagot}

684: %In larger systems, the dispersion width along $(\pi,0) - (\pi/2,\pi/2)$

685: %for $t',t''=0$ is $\approx 20\%$ of the nodal dispersion width. 

686: %\cite{MH9117,DN9428}

687: %}

688: Indeed, the effect of $t'$ and $t''$ on $\Delta E^Q$ is almost 

689: one order of magnitude larger than on $\Delta E^U$.

690: 

691: Interestingly, certain spin liquid correlations discussed in the 

692: context of the $tJ$ model strongly inhibit coherent intra-sublattice 

693: hopping. \cite{RW0301}

694: This fact, together with the above results, further supports that 

695: spin correlations in U states resemble spin liquid correlations at 

696: short length scales.

697: 

698: 

699: 

700: \section{\label{sec:anisotropy}Momentum space anisotropy}

701: 

702: In the cuprates' renowned pseudogap metallic regime, 

703: the low energy physics is determined by the states around the

704: $(\pi,0)-(0,\pi)$ line. \cite{DS0373}

705: However, there is a clear distinction between the nodal 

706: [$\vec{k}=(\pm \pi/2,\pm \pi/2)$] and the antinodal 

707: [$\vec{k}=(\pi,0),\, (0,\pi)$] regions.

708: Specifically, ARPES detects an energy difference between the 

709: single-electron spectral features around $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ and $(\pi,0)$

710: (whence the term ``pseudogap'') \cite{DS0373,DY9651} and,

711: in addition, a strong suppression of the electronic character of 

712: excitations is observed in the pseudogap region.

713: These phenomena occur in both hole and electron doped compounds

714: with a crucial difference:

715: in the former, low energy quasiparticles appear close to 

716: $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ but not around $(\pi,0)$; \cite{ZY0401,YZ0301,RS0301,KF0517}

717: in electron doped materials, both the pseudogap and the excitations

718: with little electron-like character are pushed toward the

719: zone diagonal. \cite{AR0201,KB0322,HP0111} 

720: 

721: This phenomenology is reproduced by the generalized-$tJ$ model, where

722: it stems from the role of the intra-sublattice hopping parameters 

723: $t'$ and $t''$. 

724: Indeed, for $t',t'' = 0$, the quasiparticle states at $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ 

725: and $(\pi,0)$ have both comparable energies and spectral weight 

726: intensities. \cite{MH9117,DN9428}

727: On the other hand, non-zero $t'$ and $t''$ fit the experimentally 

728: observed dispersion width along $(\pi,0) - (\pi/2,\pi/2)$.

729: \cite{GV9466,NV9576,KW9845,T0417}

730: These intra-sublattice hopping parameters further lead to pseudogap 

731: states with modified spin background correlations 

732: \cite{TS0009,LL0301,ME9916} and, thus, with small spectral weight. 

733: \cite{KW9845,TM0017,T0417,RW0501,KK0614,CC0502} 

734: As to the difference between the hole and electron doped regimes,

735: it simply follows from the change in the sign of $t'$ and $t''$. 

736: \cite{TM9496,GV9466,KW9845,T0417,RW0501,KK0614,CC0502}

737: 

738: The main message of this paper is that the results obtained in 

739: Sec. \ref{sec:local} and Sec. \ref{sec:properties} provide a 

740: microscopic two-band picture that rationalizes the above 

741: generalized-$tJ$ model behavior.

742: This picture embodies the effect of the Q and U states' short-range 

743: correlations, which underlies the momentum anisotropic pseudogap 

744: behavior, as well as its dependence on the electronic density 

745: (see below).

746: 

747: 

748: \subsection{\label{subsec:twoband}Two-band picture}

749: 

750: Sec. \ref{subsec:onehole} identifies the two distinct spin correlations 

751: that dress the vacancy in low energy single-hole states.

752: The static properties of these low energy states then follow from 

753: the reduced two-band Hamiltonian \cite{SINGLEJ}

754: \be

755: H_{reduced,\bm{k}} \equiv \left[ \begin{array}{cc}

756: \bra{Q_{\bm{k}}}H_{tt't''J}\ket{Q_{\bm{k}}} &

757: \bra{Q_{\bm{k}}}H_{tt't''J}\ket{U_{\bm{k}}} \\

758: \bra{U_{\bm{k}}}H_{tt't''J}\ket{Q_{\bm{k}}} &

759: \bra{U_{\bm{k}}}H_{tt't''J}\ket{U_{\bm{k}}}

760: \end{array}\right]

761: \label{eq:Hreduced}

762: \ee

763: This Hamiltonian yields the two spectral dispersions

764: observed both by ARPES data \cite{RS0301,KS0318,YZ0301,SR0402}

765: and by various theoretical studies of the related $tJ$ and Hubbard 

766: models. \cite{PH9544,MH9545,DZ0016,GE0036,RW0501,KK0614}

767: It also determines the hybridization of Q and U states and, thus, 

768: the spectral weight distribution throughout momentum space. 

769: Therefore, $H_{reduced,\bm{k}}$ must capture the aforementioned

770: role of $t'$ and $t''$ in the pseudogap phenomenology.

771: 

772: Interestingly, the above role of $t'$ and $t''$ can be discussed 

773: only in terms of the dispersions $E_{\bm{k}}^Q$ and $E_{\bm{k}}^U$.

774: To see this, note that $t'$ and $t''$ strongly affect the dispersion 

775: of a hole surrounded by the AF correlations in Q states 

776: [in fact, $\Delta E^Q = A (-4t'+8t'')$, 

777: where the renormalization factor $A\gtrsim 1/2$].

778: Therefore, $t' < 0$ and $t'' > 0$ increase the energy 

779: $E_{(\pi,0)}^Q$ and decrease $E_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^Q$. 

780: Consequently, 

781: $E_{(\pi,0)}^{\psi}\equiv\bra{\psi_{(\pi,0)}}H_{tt't''J}\ket{\psi_{(\pi,0)}}$

782: also increases and 

783: $E_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^{\psi}\equiv

784: \bra{\psi_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}}H_{tt't''J}\ket{\psi_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}}$

785: also decreases and, hence, a pseudogap 

786: $\Delta E^{\psi}\equiv E_{(\pi,0)}^{\psi}-E_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^{\psi}$

787: opens at $(\pi,0)$.

788: Intra-sublattice hopping is, however, strongly frustrated in U states and,

789: thus, $t' < 0$ and $t'' > 0$ increase the energy difference 

790: $E_{(\pi,0)}^Q - E_{(\pi,0)}^U$ while reducing

791: $E_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^Q - E_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^U$

792: [Figs. \ref{fig:bands}(b)-\ref{fig:bands}(c)].

793: This impacts the extent to which $\ket{Q_{\bm{k}}}$

794: and $\ket{U_{\bm{k}}}$ hybridize, reducing 

795: $W_{(\pi,0)}^Q\equiv |\langle \psi_{(\pi,0)}\ket{Q_{(\pi,0)}}|^2$ and

796: enlarging 

797: $W_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^Q\equiv |\langle \psi_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}

798: \ket{Q_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}}|^2$ (Table \ref{tab:pseudogap}).

799: For $J=0.4, t'=-0.3, t''= 0.2$ 

800: the energy $E_{(\pi,0)}^Q$ is so large that the minimum energy obtained 

801: by a linear combination of $\ket{Q_{(\pi,0)}}$ and $\ket{U_{(\pi,0)}}$ 

802: becomes higher than that of a different state $\ket{\widetilde{U}_{(\pi,0)}}$

803: with vanishing quasiparticle spectral weight [Fig. \ref{fig:bands}(b)]. 

804: As a result, $W_{(\pi,0)}^Q = 0$.

805: At the same time $W_{(\pi/2,\pi/2)}^Q = 0.75$, so that a sharp difference

806: is encountered between the electron-like character of nodal and 

807: antinodal states. \cite{ME9916,TS0009,LL0301}

808: 

809: The change between the cuprates' hole and electron doped regimes

810: amounts to a change in the sign of $t'$ and $t''$, 

811: in which case $\Delta E^Q = A (-4t'+8t'')$ changes sign as well.

812: The above argument then still applies, with the roles of 

813: momenta $(\pi,0)$ and $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ interchanged 

814: [Fig. \ref{fig:bands}(d) and Table \ref{tab:pseudogap}].

815: 

816: 

817: \subsection{\label{subsec:doping}Doping dependence}

818: 

819: The above calculation and the ensuing arguments concern a single 

820: hole surrounded by a spin background and, thus, do not have to

821: straightforwardly apply in the presence of a finite hole density.

822: Interestingly, though, a large body of evidence suggests that

823: single-hole physics is relevant away from half-filling.

824: Indeed, quantum Monte Carlo, \cite{PH9544,GE0036} exact 

825: diagonalization \cite{MH9545} and cellular dynamical mean-field 

826: theory \cite{KK0614} studies show that the two-band structure

827: identified in the half-filled spectral function below the chemical 

828: potential remains almost unaffected upon hole doping, whose main 

829: effect is to transfer spectral weight between the pre-existing 

830: bands in a momentum dependent manner.

831: This behavior is expected as long as short-range AF correlations are 

832: present. \cite{PH9544,MH9545,GE0036}

833: Since calculations on the $U/t=8$ Hubbard model \cite{DM9582} find 

834: that such correlations persist around the vacancy up to the 

835: hole density $x=0.25$, the above two-band picture may 

836: apply in a wide doping range.

837: Cuprate ARPES data also displays the two dispersive

838: features throughout a large portion of the phase diagram,

839: \cite{RS0301,YZ0301,KS0318,SR0402,DS0373} hence, it

840: complies with the aforementioned theoretical expectations.

841: 

842: It is well known that the pseudogap phenomenology weakens upon 

843: increasing the dopant density.

844: Hence, the pseudogap magnitude diminishes away from half-filling,

845: \cite{DS0373,TY0403} as does the difference in the electron-like 

846: character of nodal and antinodal excitations. 

847: \cite{RS0301,YZ0301,ZY0401,KF0517,AR0201}

848: This experimental evidence is captured by the naive extension

849: of the above two-band picture to the finite hole density case.

850: Indeed, Sec. \ref{subsec:twoband} shows that the momentum

851: space anisotropic behavior follows from the effect of $t'$ and

852: $t''$ in the dynamics of holes surrounded by short-range AF 

853: correlations.

854: Upon doping, these correlations are gradually replaced by the 

855: doping induced correlations which prevail in U states.

856: Since the latter strongly renormalize $t'$ and $t''$, the 

857: differentiation between the $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ and $(\pi,0)$ regions

858: is also gradually depleted.

859: 

860: Refs. \onlinecite{RW0501,RW0674} develop a new mean-field 

861: approach to the $tt't''J$ model that embodies the

862: above two-band picture in the presence of a finite hole density.

863: It explicitly captures the interplay between the mobile holes

864: and the above two different spin correlations and correctly

865: describes the microscopic electron dynamics in the 2D doped Mott

866: insulator.

867: This assertion is attested by the successful comparison to

868: other theoretical approaches and especially to a vast portfolio

869: of non-trivial cuprate ARPES and tunneling conductance data.

870: The latter include the aforementioned nodal-antinodal dichotomy,

871: the Fermi arcs, the peak-dip-hump structure, the kink and the extended

872: flat regions close to $(\pi,0)$ in the electron dispersion and the 

873: large diversity of tunneling spectra. \cite{RW0501,RW0531}

874: 

875: 

876: 

877: \section{\label{sec:conclusion}Conclusions}

878: 

879: In this paper, I numerically study how a single mobile hole is 

880: dressed by the encircling spins within the $tt't''J$ model context. 

881: Purely local energetic arguments decide whether a staggered

882: moment configuration or a spin configuration reminiscent

883: of spin liquid physics prevails around the vacancy.

884: In the experimentally relevant parameter regime, the competition

885: between the two spin correlations is very subtle and can be

886: particularly sensitive to the hole momentum.

887: Consequently, the electron spectral properties can be extremely 

888: momentum dependent, displaying a pseudogap and distinct quasiparticle

889: properties in the nodal and antinodal regions, as observed in 

890: both hole and electron doped cuprate compounds.

891: \cite{DS0373,ZY0401,YZ0301,RS0301,KF0517,TY0403,AR0201,KW9845}

892: AF short-range correlations are gradually depleted upon doping and,

893: thus, the above differentiation between the nodal and antinodal 

894: regions is expected to disappear further away from half-filling,

895: in agreement with the phenomenology of high-T$_c$ superconductors. 

896: \cite{DS0373,TY0403,ZY0401,KF0517,AR0201}

897: 

898: The above considerations agree with prior work 

899: \cite{PH9544,KK0614,SP0302,ST0401,RW0531,KK0606}

900: substantiating that the pseudogap and the resulting momentum space 

901: anisotropy follow from the local interaction between the doped 

902: carriers and the short-range spin correlations that strive close 

903: to the Mott insulating transition.

904: This paper goes a step further and provides an exact scheme to 

905: determine the local spin correlations that dress moving carriers.

906: In particular, it shows that the interplay between the itinerant

907: doped carrier and the surrounding local moments translates into

908: the coexistence of two different local correlations, namely the 

909: staggered moment correlations already present in the undoped system 

910: and a different type of correlations induced upon carrier doping.

911: The latter correlations are shown to be responsible for short-range 

912: phenomenology characteristic of spin-charge separated states and

913: to have a peculiar impact in the electron dynamics, specifically, 

914: they strongly renormalize $t'$ and $t''$.

915: 

916: One way to optimize both the hole kinetic energy and the spin 

917: exchange energy in doped Mott insulators is to spatially 

918: separate charge and spin degrees of freedom into, say, stripe-like 

919: configurations. \cite{ZG8991}

920: The above calculation suggests an alternative scenario:

921: the quantum superposition of two types of local states which 

922: separately enhance the $J$ and $t$ terms of the Hamiltonian.

923: These two states have a drastically different effect on the electron 

924: dynamics and provide a simple two-band microscopic picture 

925: of doped Mott insulators.

926: %which reproduces a variety of experimental data. \cite{RW0501,RW0531}

927: In this picture, the vacancy is, at times, surrounded by 

928: staggered moments while, at other instants, spin liquid correlations 

929: take over in order to facilitate the vacancy's motion.

930: In the pseudogap momentum space region, the kinetic energy of a 

931: vacancy surrounded by a local AF spin configuration increases with 

932: $|t'|$ and $|t''|$, thus tilting the balance in favor of the above 

933: spin liquid correlations (whose energy is less sensitive to

934: $t'$ and $t''$).

935: As a result, in the pseudogap regime, the way the spin background 

936: dresses the hole at $(\pi/2,\pi/2)$ differs from the way it dresses 

937: the hole at $(\pi,0)$.

938: This fact is in consonance with previous numerical evidence for the

939: approximate decoupling of spin and charge degrees of freedom in

940: the pseudogap states.

941: \cite{ME9916,TS0009,LL0301}

942: 

943: Finally, I remark that the above two-band picture provides the basis 

944: to develop new approximate schemes to describe doped Mott insulators.

945: The mean-field theory developed in Refs. \onlinecite{RW0501,RW0674}

946: constitutes one such example.

947: Remarkably, this approach reproduces a variety of experimental data. 

948: \cite{RW0501,RW0531}

949: 

950: 

951: 

952: 

953: \begin{acknowledgments}

954: This work was partially supported by the Funda\c c\~ao 

955: Calouste Gulbenkian Grant No. 58119 (Portugal), NSF Grant No. DMR-01-23156,

956: NSF-MRSEC Grant No. DMR-02-13282 and by the DOE Grant No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

957: \end{acknowledgments}

958: 

959: 

960: \bibliography{hightc}

961: 

962: \end{document}

963: 

964: 

965: 

966: 

967: