1: \documentclass[prb,amsmath]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{bm}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6: \title{Photoconductiviy of 2D Rashba system in the perpendicular AC magnetic field}
7: \author{I. I. Lyapilin}
8: \email{Lyapilin@imp.uran.ru}
9: \affiliation{Institute of Metal Physics, UD of RAS\\
10: 18, S.Kovalevskaya St. GSP-170 Ekaterinburg 620219 Russia}
11: %\date{}
12: \author{A. E. Patrakov}
13: \affiliation{Institute of Metal Physics, UD of RAS\\
14: 18, S.Kovalevskaya St. GSP-170 Ekaterinburg 620219 Russia}
15:
16: \begin{abstract}
17: The response of a 2D electron system to a DC measurement electric field has
18: been investigated in the case when the system is driven out of the
19: equilibrium by the magnetic ultra-high frequency field that leads to
20: combined transitions involving the spin-orbit interaction.
21: It has been shown that the method of non-equilibrium statistical operator
22: in conjunction ith the method of canonical transformations
23: allows one to build a theory of linear response of a non-equilibrium
24: 2D electron gas to a weak ``measurement'' DC electric field.
25: The proposed theory predicts that such perturbation of the electron system
26: with high ($\sim 10^7$~cm$^2$/Vs) mobility leads to a new type
27: of 2D electron gas conductivity oscillations
28: controlled by the ratio of the radiation frequency to the cyclotron frequency.
29: \end{abstract}
30: \maketitle
31: \section{Introduction}
32: In 2D electron systems with high ($\sim 10^7$~cm$^2$/Vs) electron mobility,
33: the magnetoresistance exhibits strong oscillations in ``pre-Shubnikov''
34: range of magnetic fields under microwave irradiation \cite{Zudov03,Mani02}.
35: These oscillations are caused by electron transitions between Landau levels
36: due to the electric component of the microwave radiation.
37:
38: Together with the oscillations of the diagonal components of the
39: conductivity tensor,
40: ``beats'' have been found experimentally \cite{Mani02} in the interval of
41: more weak magnetic fields.
42: Such beats are usually related with the manifestations of the interaction
43: between kinetic and spin degrees of freedom of the conductivity electrons.
44: Such interaction is the spin-orbit interaction (SOI) that is known to be the
45: origin of numerous effects in transport phenomena observed in such systems
46: \cite{Hammar-00,Das,Levitov}, etc.
47: SOI also leads to the possibility of electron transitions between Landau
48: levels in the magnetic field at the combined resonance frequencies
49: \cite{Rash}, thus transitions being possible both in antinodes of electric
50: and magnetic fields \cite{Kalash}.
51: Finally, operation of a spin transistor (schemes of which have been
52: considered in \cite{zutic}) is based upon spin degrees of freedom.
53: All of the above has determined elevated interest to investigations of the
54: SOI in 2D semiconductor structures.
55:
56: For the purpose of studying the SOI, it appears interesting to investigate a
57: model in which the role of the SOI should manifest itself the strongest.
58: Since the SOI depends upon both translational and spin degrees of freedom,
59: then it is a channel over which energy (both electric and magnetic) can be
60: absorbed from the ultra-high frequency field, thus causing transitions
61: between Landau levels.
62: Because of that, it is interesting to investigate the response of a
63: non-equilibrium electron system to a DC weak (``measurement'') electric
64: field for the case when the initial non-equilibrium state is created with a
65: high-frequency AC magnetic field that leads to combined transitions.
66: The question is how this perturbation affects transport coefficients, in
67: particular, the conductivity tensor.
68:
69: \section{Effective Hamiltonian}
70: The discussed model includes the contributions form Landau quantization and
71: (in the long-wavelength limit) from the microwave radiation.
72: We consider impurity centers for the role of scatterers, treating the
73: scattering process perturbatively.
74:
75: The Hamiltonian of the system under consideration consists of the
76: kinetic energy $H_k$, Zeeman energy $H_s$ in the magnetic field $\bm H =
77: (0,0,H)$, the spin-orbit interaction $H_{ks}$, interactions of electrons
78: with AC magnetic and DC electric fields and with impurities, and the
79: Hamiltonian of the impurities themselves:
80: \begin{equation}\label{1}
81: \mathcal H(t) = H_k+H_s+H_{ks}+H_{eh}(t)+H^0_{ef}+H_v+H_{ev},
82: \end{equation}
83: $$
84: H_k=\sum_j\frac{(\bm p_j-(e/c)\bm A (x_j))^2}{2m},
85: $$
86: $$
87: H_s=\hbar\omega_s\sum_j S_j^z,\quad \hbar\omega_s=g\mu_0H.
88: $$
89: $S_i^\alpha$ and $p_i^\alpha$ are operators of the components of
90: the spin and kinetic momentum of the $i$th electron, where
91: $[p_i^\alpha,p_j^\beta] = -i\delta_{ij} m
92: \hbar\omega_c\varepsilon_{\alpha\beta z}$, $\omega_c=|e|H/mc$ is
93: the cyclotron frequency, and $\mu_0$ is Bohr magneton.
94:
95: In this paper, we limit our consideration to the case when AC and DC
96: magnetic fields are parallel to each other: $\bm H(t) = (0, 0, H^z(t))$.
97: In this case, the Hamiltonian of the interaction of electrons with the
98: AC magnetic field has the form:
99: \begin{equation}\label{002}
100: H_{eh}(t) = g\mu_0 H^z(t) \sum_j S_j^z.
101: \end{equation}
102:
103: We assume the specific form of the SOI term, namely, Rashba interaction,
104: which is non-zero even in the linear order in momentum:
105: \begin{equation}\label{7}
106: H_{ks}(p) =
107: \alpha \varepsilon_{zik} \sum_j S^i_j p^k_j =
108: \frac{i\alpha}{2} \sum_j (S^+_j p^-_j - S^-_j p^+_j),
109: \end{equation}
110: $$
111: S^\pm = S^x \pm i S^y, \quad p^\pm = p^x \pm i p^y.
112: $$
113: Here $\alpha$ is the constant characterizing the SOI, $\varepsilon$ is the
114: fully-antisymmetric Levi---Chivita tensor.
115:
116: The spin-orbit interaction leads to correlation of spatial and spin motion
117: of electrons, thus, the translational and spin-related subsystems are not
118: well-defined.
119: Since the SOI is in some sense small, then one can perform a
120: momentum-dependent canonical transformation that decouples kinetic and spin
121: degrees of freedom.
122: All other terms in the Hamiltonian, describing the interaction
123: of electrons with the lattice and external fields also undergo the
124: transformation.
125: In this case, the effective interaction of electrons in the system with
126: external fields appears, which leads to resonant absorption of the field
127: energy not only at the frequency of the paramagnetic resonance $\omega_s$
128: or cyclotron resonance $\omega_c$, but also at their linear
129: combinations.
130: The gauge-invariant theory describing such transitions has been developed in
131: \cite{VPKalash}.
132:
133: Assuming the SOI to be small, we perform the canonical transformation of the
134: Hamiltonian.
135: Up to the terms linear in $T(t)$, we have:
136: \begin{equation}\label{5}
137: \tilde {\mathcal H} = e^{-i T(p)}\mathcal H e^{i T(p)}\approx
138: \mathcal H -i [T(p), \mathcal H].
139: \end{equation}
140: The operator of the canonical transformation $T(p)$ has to be determined
141: from the requirement that, after the transformation, the $k$ and $s$
142: subsystems become independent. This requirement, as one can easily see,
143: is satisfied if one puts
144: \begin{equation}\label{8}
145: T(p)=-\frac{\alpha}{2\hbar(\omega_c-\omega_s)}
146: \sum_j(S^+_jp^-_j-S^-_jp^+_j).
147: \end{equation}
148:
149: One can write the transformed Hamiltonian in the following form:
150: \begin{equation}\label{9}
151: \mathcal{\tilde{H}}(t)=H_0 + H^0_{ef}
152: +H_{eh}(t)+[T(p),H_{eh}(t)+H^0_{ef}+{H}_{ev}],
153: \end{equation}
154: $$
155: H_0 = H_k + H_s + H_v + H_{ev}.
156: $$
157: The effective interaction of the electrons and the AC magnetic field
158: (responsible for combined transitions) can be found using the explicit
159: expression for the operator $T(t)$:
160: \begin{equation}\label{10}
161: H_{eh,1}(t) = -i [T(p),H_{eh}(t)] =
162: \frac{i\alpha\omega_{1s}}{2(\omega_c - \omega_s)}
163: (T^{+-} - T^{-+})\cos \omega t,
164: \end{equation}
165: $$
166: T^{\alpha \beta}=\sum_i S^\alpha_i p^\beta_i,
167: $$
168: where $\omega_{1s}=g e H_1/(2 m_0 c)$,
169: $H_1$ is the intensity of the
170: linearly polarized magnetic field, oscillating with the frequency
171: $\omega$ according to the cosine law.
172:
173: It follows from Eq. (\ref{10}) that the effective
174: interaction $H_{eh,1}(t)$ leads to combined transitions at frequency
175: $\omega_c - \omega_s$, while
176: the interaction of the spin degrees of freedom of the conductivity electrons
177: with the AC magnetic field $H_{eh}(t)$ leads to resonant transitions at the
178: frequency $\omega_s$.
179: Since, for our further calculations, the response of the non-equilibrium
180: system to the measurement electric field is interesting, in which the
181: contribution from the translational degrees of freedom dominates, we will
182: restrict our consideration to the effective interaction solely.
183:
184: During the calculation of the non-equilibrium response of the electron
185: system to the measurement electric field, there are technical
186: difficulties cased by the dependence of the effective interaction
187: $H_{eh,1}(t)$ upon time.
188: One can avoid them by transferring the time dependence to the impurity
189: subsystem.
190: This can be done by means of a new canonical transformation.
191: The explicit form of the canonical transformation $W_2(t)$ is determined
192: from the requirement that it excludes $H_{eh,1}(t)$ from the effective
193: Hamiltonian of a system without impurities:
194: \begin{equation}\label{eq:UC2}
195: W_2^\dagger(t) (-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} +H_k + H_s +
196: H_{eh,1}(t))W_2(t) = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} +H_k + H_s.
197: \end{equation}
198: The operator $W_2(t)$ is expressed in the following form:
199: \begin{equation}\label{w2}
200: W_2(t) = \exp(i T_2(t)).
201: \end{equation}
202: The operator $T_2(t)$ is searched for in the form:
203: \begin{equation}\label{eq:UC2p}
204: T_2(t)=\eta^+(t) T^{+-} + \eta^-(t) T^{-+},
205: \end{equation}
206: where one has to determine the parameters $\eta^\pm(t)$.
207: In the linear approximation in the constant of the spin-orbit
208: interaction, we have:
209: \begin{equation}
210: \eta^\pm(t)=\frac{\alpha \omega_{1s}(
211: (\omega_c - \omega_s)\cos \omega t \pm i \omega \sin \omega t)}
212: {2 \hbar (\omega_c - \omega_s) ((\omega_c - \omega_s)^2 - \omega^2)}
213: \end{equation}
214:
215: As a result of the canonical transformation $W_2(t)$,
216: renormalization of the electron-impurity interaction happens.
217: In the case of elastic scattering, for
218: obtaining the renormalized Hamiltonian of the electron-impurity
219: interaction, it is sufficient to calculate
220: $W_2^\dagger(t) \exp(i \bm q \bm r_j) W_2(t)$.
221: In the linear approximation in the constant of the spin-orbit
222: interaction $\alpha$, we obtain:
223: \begin{equation}
224: W_2^\dagger(t) \exp(i \bm q \bm r_j) W_2(t) = \exp(i \bm q \bm r_j)
225: (1 - i \hbar(\eta^+(t)S_j^+ q^- + \eta^-(t) S_j^- q^+))
226: \end{equation}
227: Using the explicit form of $\eta^\pm(t)$, we have:
228: \begin{multline}\label{ei}
229: W_2^\dagger(t) \exp(i \bm q \bm r_j) W_2(t) = \exp(i \bm q \bm r_j)
230: -i \frac{\alpha \omega_{1s}}{2 (\omega_c - \omega_s)
231: ((\omega_c - \omega_s)^2 - \omega^2)} \\\times
232: \bigg(\Big((\omega_c - \omega_s) \cos \omega t + i \omega \sin \omega t
233: \Big) S_j^+ q^- +
234: \Big((\omega_c - \omega_s) \cos \omega t - i \omega \sin \omega t
235: \Big) S_j^- q^+ \bigg) \exp(i \bm q \bm r_j)
236: \end{multline}
237: The speed of the electron momentum change is:
238: \begin{equation}
239: \dot p^\pm_{(\tilde v)} = \dot p^\pm_{(v)} - \sum\limits_{\bm q j}
240: \sum\limits_{k,l=\pm 1} V(q) \rho(q) \frac{\alpha \omega_{1s}}{2
241: (\omega_c - \omega_s)} q^\pm \exp(i \bm q \bm r_j) \frac{S_j^k
242: q^{-k} e^{i l \omega t}}{\omega_c - \omega_s - k l \omega},
243: \end{equation}
244: where
245: \begin{equation}
246: S_j^k = \left\{
247: \begin{array}{l}
248: S_j^+, k=+1 \\
249: S_j^-, k=-1
250: \end{array}
251: \right.,\qquad
252: q^k = \left\{
253: \begin{array}{l}
254: q^+, k=+1 \\
255: q^-, k=-1
256: \end{array}
257: \right.
258: \end{equation}
259:
260: As one can see from (\ref{ei}), the renormalized electron-impurity
261: interaction Hamiltonian acquired time dependence.
262: In such canonically transformed system, impurities act as a coherent
263: oscillating field that leads to resonant transitions.
264:
265: \section{Momentum Relaxation Rate}
266: We assume that the initial non-equilibrium state of the system under
267: consideration is created by the ultra-high frequency magnetic field and
268: can be described with the distribution $\bar{\rho}(t)$.
269: If some
270: additional perturbation acts upon the system, then a new non-equilibrium
271: state is formed in the system, that requires an extended set of basis
272: operators for its description.
273: The new non-equilibrium distribution is described with the operator
274: $\rho(t,0)$.
275: The task is to find the response of a non-equilibrium system to a weak
276: measurement field.
277: Using the technique of calculation the non-equilibrium statistical
278: operator \cite{VPK}, we have for the momentum relaxation rate:
279: \begin{equation}\label{t1}
280: \frac{1}{\tau} = \frac{1}{2 m n T} \operatorname{Re}
281: \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_{-\infty}^0 dt_1 e^{(\varepsilon -
282: \omega_1)t_1} dt_2 e^{\varepsilon t_2} \int_0^1 d\lambda A(\lambda,
283: t_1 + t_2),
284: \end{equation}
285: \begin{equation}
286: A(\lambda, t_1 + t_2) = \operatorname{Sp}\{ \dot p^+_{(\tilde v)}(t)
287: e^{i L_0 (t_1 + t_2)}\rho_q^{\lambda}[\dot p^-_{(\tilde
288: v)}(t+t_1+t_2), H_k + H_s] \rho_q^{ 1-\lambda}.
289: \end{equation}
290: Here $T$ is the common temperature of the kinetic and spin subsystem,
291: that can be introduced when one neglects the ``heating'' effects,
292: $\rho_q(t)$ is the quasiequilibrium statistical operator.
293:
294: Now we expand the formula (\ref{t1}) using the explicit expression
295: for the renormalized electron-impurity interaction
296: $\tilde{H}_{ev}$.
297: Inserting the explicit expression for the electron-impurity
298: interaction and averaging over the system of scatterers, we
299: obtain:
300: \begin{multline}\label{t3}
301: A(\lambda, t_1 + t_2) = \sum\limits_{\bm q j j'} \sum\limits_{k,l=\pm 1}
302: |V(\bm q)|^2 N_i
303: \frac{\alpha^2 \omega_{1s}^2}
304: {4(\omega_c - \omega_s)^2 (\omega_c - \omega_s - k l \omega)^2} q^4\\\times
305: e^{-i l \omega (t_1 + t_2)}
306: \operatorname{Sp}\{
307: S_j^k \exp(i \bm q \bm r_j)
308: e^{i L_0 (t_1 + t_2)}
309: \rho_q^{\lambda}
310: [ S_{j'}^{-k} \exp(-i \bm q \bm r_{j'}), H_k + H_s]
311: \rho_q^{1-\lambda}
312: \}
313: \end{multline}
314:
315: Here $N_i$ is the impurity concentration. Rewriting this
316: expression using secondary quantization and averaging the Fermi
317: operators using Wick's theorem, we have:
318: \begin{multline}
319: A(\lambda, t_1 + t_2) = \sum\limits_{\bm q \nu \mu}\sum\limits_{k,l=\pm
320: 1}
321: |V(\bm q)|^2 N_i
322: \frac{\alpha^2 \omega_{1s}^2}
323: {16(\omega_c - \omega_s)^2 (\omega_c - \omega_s - k l \omega)^2} q^4\\\times
324: e^{-i l \omega (t_1 + t_2)}
325: (\varepsilon_{\mu'} - \varepsilon_{\mu})
326: |(2 S^k e^{i \bm q \bm r})_{\nu \mu}|^2
327: f_\nu (1 - f_\mu)
328: e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}(t_1 + t_2)(\varepsilon_\mu - \varepsilon_{\nu})}
329: e^{-\beta_e(\varepsilon_\mu - \varepsilon_{\nu})\lambda},
330: \end{multline}
331: where $f$ is the Fermi---Dirac distribution. $\nu$ and $\mu$ are the
332: electron states in the DC magnetic field, they are characterized by the
333: Landau level number $n$, $x$ projection of the wave wector $k^x$, and
334: $z$ projection of the spin $s^z$.
335:
336: Then we should integrate over $\lambda$, $t_1$ and $t_2$, and take the limit
337: $\omega_1 \to 0$, $\varepsilon\to +0$ (because we are interested in the
338: zero-frequncy response). For the correction to the momentum relaxation
339: rate caused by the microwave radiation, we obtain:
340: \begin{multline}\label{t5}
341: \int_{-\infty}^0 dt_1 e^{(\varepsilon - i \omega_1) t_1}
342: dt_2 e^{\varepsilon t_2} \int_0^1
343: d\lambda A(\lambda, t_1 + t_2) =\sum\limits_{\bm q \nu \mu l}
344: |V(\bm q)|^2 N_i J_l^2(|K_q|) q^2|(2 S^z e^{i \bm q \bm r})_{\nu
345: \mu}|^2 (f_\nu - f_\mu)\\\times
346: \frac{1}{\varepsilon - i l
347: \omega - (i/\hbar)(\varepsilon_\mu - \varepsilon_\nu)}
348: \frac{1}{\varepsilon - i\omega_1 - i l \omega - (i/\hbar)(\varepsilon_\mu
349: - \varepsilon_\nu)}
350: \end{multline}
351: In the $\varepsilon \to 0$ limit, we obtain:
352: \begin{equation}\label{t7}
353: \Delta(\frac{1}{\tau}) = -\sum\limits_{\bm q \nu \mu k l}
354: |V(\bm q)|^2 N_i
355: \frac{\pi \hbar \alpha^2 \omega_{1s}^2}
356: {8 m n (\omega_c - \omega_s)^2 (\omega_c - \omega_s - k l \omega)^2} q^4
357: |(S^k e^{i \bm q \bm r})_{\nu \mu}|^2
358: (f_\nu - f_\mu)
359: \frac{\partial}{\partial \varepsilon_\mu} \delta(l \hbar \omega +
360: \varepsilon_\mu - \varepsilon_\nu)
361: \end{equation}
362: The equation (\ref{t7}) contains a singularity in its right hand side, which
363: is removed, as usual, due to broadening of the Landau levels by scattering
364: electrons on impurities:
365: \begin{equation}\label{t8}
366: \delta(\mathcal E - \varepsilon_\mu) \to D_\mu(\mathcal E)=
367: \frac{\sqrt{\pi/2}}{\Gamma} \exp\left(-\frac{(\mathcal E -
368: \varepsilon_\mu)}{2 \Gamma^2}\right).
369: \end{equation}
370: The Landau level width $\Gamma$ can be expressed via the electron mobility
371: $\mu$ in zero magnetic field:
372: \begin{equation}\label{t9}
373: \Gamma = \hbar\sqrt\frac{2 \gamma_n \omega_c}{\pi \tau_{\textrm{tr}}}, \qquad
374: \tau_{\textrm{tr}}=\frac{m \mu}{|e|}
375: \end{equation}
376:
377: Integrating over the energy for the case $T > \Gamma$, we have:
378: \begin{equation}\label{t10}
379: \int d\mathcal E \frac{\partial}{\partial \mathcal E}
380: D_\nu(\mathcal E \pm \hbar\omega) D_\mu(\mathcal E) \\
381: =-\frac{\pi^{3/2}(\varepsilon_\mu - \varepsilon_\nu \pm
382: \hbar\omega)}{4\Gamma^3} \exp\left(-\frac{(\varepsilon_\mu -
383: \varepsilon_\nu \pm \hbar\omega)^2} {4 \Gamma^2}\right)
384: \end{equation}
385:
386: Calculating the matrix element in (\ref{t7}) on the wave functions
387: \begin{equation}\label{t11}
388: \psi_{\nu}\equiv\psi_{n k^x S^z} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2^n n! \pi^{1/2}
389: \ell}} \exp(i k^x x)
390: \exp\left(-\frac{(y - y_0)^2}{2 \ell^2}\right) H_n(\frac{y -
391: y_0}{\ell})\chi_{S^z},
392: \end{equation}
393: we obtain:
394: \begin{multline}
395: |\langle n_\nu k^x_\nu S^z_\nu | S^k \exp(i \bm q \bm r) | n_\mu
396: k^x_\mu S^z_\mu \rangle|^2 = \delta_{S^z_\nu + k, S^z_\mu}
397: \delta_{k^x_\nu, q_x + k^x_\mu} \exp\left(-\frac{\ell^2
398: q^2}{2}\right) \\\times
399: \frac{(\min(n_\nu,
400: n_\mu))!}{4(\max(n_\nu, n_\mu))!} \left(\frac{\ell^2
401: q^2}{2}\right)^{|n_\nu - n_\mu|} \left(L_{\min(n_\nu,
402: n_\mu)}^{|n_\nu - n_\mu|}\left( \frac{\ell^2
403: q^2}{2}\right)\right)^2.
404: \end{multline}
405: Here $y_0=\ell^2 k^x$ is the cyclotron orbit center coordinate, $\ell$
406: is the magnetic length, $H_n(x)$ denotes Hermite polynomials, and
407: $\chi_{S^z}$ is the eigenfunction of the $z$ spin projection.
408:
409: Finally, integrating over $\bm q$, we have:
410: \begin{multline}
411: \int\limits_0^\infty d(q^2) q^4 \exp\left(-\frac{\ell^2 q^2}{2}\right)
412: \left(-\frac{\ell^2 q^2}{2}\right)^{|n_\nu - n_\mu|}
413: \left(L_{\min(n_\nu, n_\mu)}^{|n_\nu - n_\mu|}(\frac{\ell^2
414: q^2}{2})\right)^2 \\=
415: \frac{8}{\ell^6}\frac{(\max(n_\nu, n_\mu))!}{(\min(n_\nu, n_\mu))!}
416: (n_\nu^2 + n_\mu^2 + 3 (n_\nu + n_\mu) + 4 n_\nu n_\mu + 2)
417: \end{multline}
418:
419: Thus, for the case of point scatterers, where $V(q)$ does not depend on
420: $q$, the radiation-induced correction to the inverse relaxation time is:
421: \begin{multline}\label{t16}
422: \Delta(\frac{1}{\tau}) = \sum\limits_{n_\nu n_\mu k l} |V(q)|^2 N_i
423: \frac{\pi^{1/2}\hbar\alpha^2 \omega_{1s}^2}
424: {32 m n \ell^8 \Gamma^3 (\omega_c - \omega_s)^2 (\omega_c - \omega_s - k
425: l \omega)^2}\\\times
426: (n_\nu^2 + n_\mu^2 + 3 (n_\nu + n_\mu) + 4 n_\nu n_\mu + 2)
427: (f(\varepsilon_\nu)-f(\varepsilon_\mu))\\\times
428: ((n_\mu - n_\nu) \hbar \omega_c + k \hbar\omega_s + l \hbar\omega)
429: \exp\left(-\frac{(
430: (n_\mu - n_\nu) \hbar \omega_c + k \hbar\omega_s + l \hbar\omega
431: )^2}
432: {4\Gamma^2}\right)
433: \end{multline}
434:
435:
436: \section{Numerical Analysis}
437: Using the expression for the momentum relaxation rate, one can also write
438: the formula for the diagonal components of the conductivity tensor
439: $\sigma_{x x}=(n m^{-1} e^2 \tau)/(\omega_c^2\tau^2 + 1)$.
440: Numerical calculations have been carried
441: out with the following parameters: $m = 0.067\ m_0$ ($m_0$ is the
442: free electron mass), the Fermi energy is $\mathcal{E}_F = 10$~meV,
443: the mobility of the 2D electrons varies as $\mu\approx 0.9 -
444: 1.5\times 10^7$~cm$^2$/Vs, the electron density $n=3\times
445: 10^{11}$~cm$^{-2}$. The microwave radiation frequency is $f=
446: 50$~GHz, the temperature is $T\approx 2.4$~K. The magnetic field
447: varied as 0.02~--~0.3~T.
448:
449: The dependence of the 2D electron gas photoconductivity on the
450: $\omega/\omega_c$ ration is presented in Fig.~1.
451: \begin{figure}[t]
452: \center\includegraphics[width=10cm]{plot1.eps}
453: \caption{Photoconductivity of the 2D electron gas vs of the
454: magnetic field induction for different values of electron
455: mobility. The radiation frequency is 50~GHz and
456: $\gamma=2$.}\label{fig:Lmuhmu}
457: \end{figure}
458: One can see that the dependence of electron mobility upon the
459: magnetic field has the oscillating character.
460:
461: \section{Conclusion}
462: The response of a non-equilibrium electron system to the DC electric
463: measurement field has been studied for the case when the initial
464: non-equilibrium state of the system is created by an ultra-high frequency
465: magnetic field that leads to combined transitions.
466: Within the proposed theory, it has been shown that such
467: perturbation of the electron system essentially
468: influences the transport coefficients and leads to the oscillations of the
469: diagonal components of the conductivity tensor.
470: The discussed effect is analogous to the phenomenon observed in
471: GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures with ultra-high electron mobility \cite{Mani02}.
472: However, unlike that phenomenon, the manifestation of the oscillatory
473: pattern is dictated by the spin-orbit interaction existing in the crystals
474: under consideration.
475:
476: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
477:
478: \bibitem{Zudov03}{M. A. Zudov and R. R. Du, L. N. Pfeiffer and K. W. West,
479: arXiv:cond-mat/0210034; Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 046807 (2003);
480: EP2S-15, Nara, Japan. 2003}
481:
482: \bibitem{Mani02}{R.~G. Mani, J.~H. Smet, K. von Klitzing, V.
483: Narayanamurti, W.~B. Johnson, and V. Umansky, Nature, {\bf 420},
484: 646 (2002); arXiv:cond-mat/0306388; 26-Inter. Conf. Phys. of
485: Semicond. Edinburg. 2002; Ep2S-15, Nara, Japan. 2003}
486:
487: \bibitem{Das} B.Das, D. C. Miller, S. Datta, R. Reifenberger, W.P. Hong
488: P.K. Bhattacharya, M. Jaffe, Phys. Rev B {\bf 39}, 1411, (1989).
489:
490: \bibitem{Hammar-00} P.R.~Hammar, M. Johnson, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 61}, 11, 7207
491: (2000).
492:
493: \bibitem{Levitov} L.S. Levitov, Yu.V. Nazarov, G.M. Eliashberg,
494: Sov.Phys. JETP {\bf 61}, 1333, (1985).
495:
496: \bibitem{Rash} E.I. Rashba, Uspehi Fizicheckih Nauk, {\bf 84}, 557, (1964).
497:
498: \bibitem{Kalash} V.P. Kalashnikov, I.I. Lyapilin, Teoreticheckaya i
499: Matematicheskaya Fizika {\bf 18}, 273,(1974).
500:
501: \bibitem{zutic} I.~Zutic, J.~Fabian, S.~Das~Sarma, Rev. Mod.
502: Phys. {\bf 76}, 323 (2004).
503:
504: \bibitem{VPKalash} V.P. Kalashnikov, Teoreticheckaya i Matematicheskaya
505: Fizika {\bf 5}, 293 (1970).
506:
507: \bibitem{VPK} V.P. Kalashnikov, Teoreticheckaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika
508: {\bf 9}, 94, (1971).
509:
510: \end{thebibliography}
511: \end{document}
512: