1: \documentclass[prb,twocolumn]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3:
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{Effect of pressure on the polarized infrared optical response of quasi-one-dimensional LaTiO$_{3.41}$}
8:
9: \author{S. Frank,$^{1}$ C. A. Kuntscher,$^{1*}$ I. Loa,$^{2}$ K. Syassen,$^{2}$ and F. Lichtenberg$^3$}
10: \address{
11: $^1$ 1. Physikalisches Institut, Universit\"at Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany\\
12: $^2$ Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Festk\"orperforschung, Heisenbergstrasse\ 1, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany \\
13: $^3$ Experimentalphysik VI, Institut f\"ur Physik, EKM,
14: Universit\"at Augsburg, Universit\"atsstrasse 1, D-86135
15: Augsburg, Germany}
16:
17:
18: \date{\today}
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: The pressure-induced changes in the optical properties of the
22: quasi-one-dimensional conductor LaTiO$_{3.41}$ were studied by
23: polarization-dependent mid-infrared micro-spectroscopy at room
24: temperature. For the polarization of the incident radiation
25: parallel to the conducting direction, the optical conductivity
26: spectrum shows a pronounced mid-infrared absorption band,
27: exhibiting a shift to lower frequencies and an increase in
28: oscillator strength with increasing pressure. On the basis of
29: its pressure dependence, interpretations of the band in terms
30: of electronic transitions and polaronic excitations are
31: discussed. Discontinuous changes in the optical response near
32: 15~GPa are in agreement with a recently reported
33: pressure-induced structural phase transition and indicate the
34: onset of a dimensional crossover in this highly anisotropic
35: system.
36: \end{abstract}
37:
38: \pacs{71.38.-k, 78.30.-j, 78.67.-n}
39:
40: \maketitle
41:
42: \section{Introduction}
43: Perovskite-related titanates are intensively studied both
44: experimentally and theoretically, since they show interesting
45: physical properties due to the complex interplay of structural and
46: electronic degrees of freedom. Recently, special attention was
47: paid to the compounds $R$TiO$_{3.0}$ (with $R$ being a trivalent
48: rare-earth ion), \cite{Mochizuki04a} which are Mott-Hubbard
49: insulators with a Ti 3d$^1$ configuration. LaTiO$_{3.0}$, in
50: particular, has attracted much attention
51: [\onlinecite{Mochizuki04a,Khaliullin00,Keimer00,Cwik03,Mochizuki03,Hemberger03,Kiyama03,Pavarini04,Haverkort05,Ruckkamp05,Ulrich05}],
52: partly because of different orbital ordering scenarios.
53: LaTiO$_{3.0}$ is the end member of the series LaTiO$_{3.5-x}$ with
54: 0$\leq$$x$$\leq$0.5, in which one finds a rich variety of
55: different structural, magnetic, and electronic properties,
56: depending on the composition parameter $x$. Besides the
57: Mott-Hubbard system LaTiO$_{3.0}$, the band insulator
58: LaTiO$_{3.5}$ is a prominent member of the series because of its
59: ferroelectricity up to extremely high
60: temperatures.\cite{Nanamatsu74}
61:
62:
63: \begin{figure}[t]
64: \includegraphics[width=0.9\columnwidth]{struct.eps}
65: \caption{(Color online) Crystal structure of LaTiO$_{3.41}$
66: composed of perovskite-like slabs of vertex-sharing TiO$_6$
67: octahedra, which are separated by additional oxygen
68: layers.\cite{Daniels03} Along the $a$ axis the TiO$_6$ octahedra
69: are connected via their apical oxygen atoms forming chains.}
70: \label{structure}
71: \end{figure}
72:
73:
74: Other compounds of the series LaTiO$_{3.5-x}$ were synthesized
75: recently,\cite{Lichtenberg01} among them LaTiO$_{3.41}$, which is
76: a quasi-one-dimensional (quasi-1D) conductor according to its
77: anisotropic DC resistivity and infrared
78: response.\cite{Lichtenberg01,Kuntscher03} It crystalizes in a
79: monoclinic structure (space group P2$_1$/c) with lattice
80: parameters $a$=7.86 \AA, $b$=5.53 \AA, $c$=31.48 \AA, and
81: $\beta$=97.1$^{\circ}$. \cite{Daniels03} The structure consists
82: of slabs of vertex-sharing TiO$_6$ octahedra separated by
83: additional oxygen layers (see Fig.\ \ref{structure}). Along $c$
84: the slabs are five octahedra wide, and neighboring slabs are
85: shifted along the $a$ axis by half an octahedron. The octahedra
86: are tilted away from the $a$ axis and rotated around this axis,
87: similarly to the GdFeO$_3$-type arrangement of octahedra in
88: LaTiO$_{3.0}$.\cite{Cwik03} LaTiO$_{3.41}$ can thus be viewed as
89: being built of LaTiO$_{3.0}$-type slabs.
90: The characteristic units of the crystal structure are chains of
91: TiO$_6$ octahedra, connected via their apical oxygen atoms and
92: oriented along the $a$ axis. These chains can serve as an
93: explanation for the anisotropic electronic transport
94: properties of LaTiO$_{3.41}$, with relatively low resistivity
95: values along the chain direction $a$.\cite{Lichtenberg01}
96:
97:
98: To shed light on the conduction mechanism of quasi-1D conducting
99: LaTiO$_{3.41}$ its polarization-dependent reflectivity was studied
100: as a function of temperature.\cite{Kuntscher03} An
101: anisotropic optical response was observed, with a Drude
102: contribution of free carriers for the polarization of the incident
103: radiation parallel to the conducting crystal axis $a$
104: and an insulating character for the perpendicular direction $b$.
105: Furthermore, the {\bf E}$\parallel$$a$ optical conductivity spectrum
106: includes a pronounced mid-infrared (MIR) absorption band, showing a
107: shift to lower frequencies and an increase in oscillator strength
108: with decreasing temperature. A polaronic model was proposed to account
109: for the temperature dependence of the MIR band.\cite{Kuntscher03}
110:
111:
112: The application of external pressure to LaTiO$_{3.41}$ up to
113: $P$=18~GPa leads to continuous changes of the crystal
114: structure:\cite{Loa04} The axial compressibilities are
115: anisotropic with a ratio of approximately 1:2:3 for the $a$,
116: $b$, and $c$ axes. The large compressibility along $c$ results
117: from the highly compressible oxygen-rich layers separating the
118: LaTiO$_{3.0}$-type slabs (see Fig.\ \ref{structure}). The
119: differences in axis compressibilities cause a small increase of
120: the monoclinic angle from 97.17$^\circ$ to 97.43$^\circ$ with
121: increasing pressure up to 18~GPa. From the pressure dependence
122: of the lattice parameters the octahedral tilt angle against the
123: $a$ axis was estimated to double at 18~GPa compared to ambient
124: conditions. Above 18~GPa the appearance of additional
125: reflections in the x-ray diffraction diagrams indicate a
126: sluggish structural phase transition, which is completed at 24
127: GPa.\cite{Loa04}
128:
129:
130: In this paper we report the effect of pressure on the MIR
131: reflectivity of LaTiO$_{3.41}$. Reflectivity spectra of a
132: single-crystal sample were measured for polarizations along the
133: $a$ and $b$ axes using MIR micro-spectroscopy in combination
134: with a diamond anvil high pressure cell. The primary motivation
135: is twofold: (1) Pressure effects are of considerable interest
136: for the interpretation of the MIR band polarized along the
137: conducting crystal direction. (2) In view of the anisotropic
138: compressibility, external pressure is a means to continuously
139: tune the electronic anisotropy in the $ab$ plane and to explore
140: the possibility of a crossover from one- to two-dimensional
141: behavior. A further question is whether the pronounced optical
142: anisotropy of the ambient-pressure phase is preserved across
143: the first-order structural phase transition near 18~GPa.
144:
145: \begin{figure}[t]
146: \includegraphics[width=0.85\columnwidth]{Ref_fit.eps}
147: \caption{(Color online) (a) Room-temperature reflectivity
148: spectra $R_{s-d}$ of LaTiO$_{3.41}$ inside the diamond anvil
149: cell at $P=0.3$~GPa for the polarizations
150: \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{a} and
151: \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{b}. The light grey lines are fits of
152: the reflectivity spectra with the Drude-Lorentz model, taking
153: into account the sample-diamond interface. Inset: Enlargement
154: of the low-frequency range of the \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{b}
155: reflectivity spectrum showing the optical phonon mode at 800
156: cm$^{-1}$. (b) Optical conductivity spectra obtained from the
157: Drude-Lorentz fits of the reflectivity data shown in (a).
158: Inset: Geometries for the sample and reference measurements.}
159: \label{Ref-fit}
160: \end{figure}
161:
162:
163: \begin{figure}[t]
164: \includegraphics[width=0.85\columnwidth]{Rsd.eps}
165: \caption{(Color online) Room-temperature reflectivity spectra
166: R$_{s-d}$ of LaTiO$_{3.41}$ as a function of pressure for the
167: polari\-zation (a) \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{a} and (b)
168: \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{b}. The inset in (b) shows the
169: low-frequency range (700 - 1000~cm$^{-1}$) of the spectra for
170: four pressures. The phonon at around 800~cm$^{-1}$ shifts to
171: higher frequencies with increasing pressure. The arrows
172: indicate the changes with increasing pressure.} \label{R_s-d}
173: \end{figure}
174:
175:
176:
177: \section{Experiment}
178: \label{sectionexperiment} The investigated LaTiO$_{3.41}$
179: crystals were grown by a floating zone melting process, and
180: their oxygen content was determined by thermogravimetric
181: analysis.\cite{Lichtenberg01} Pressure-dependent reflectance
182: measurements for the electrical field vector \textbf{E} of the
183: incident light along the \emph{a} and \emph{b} axes were
184: performed in the MIR frequency range (600-8000~cm$^{-1}$) at
185: room temperature, using a Bruker IFs 66v/S Fourier transform
186: infrared spectrometer. The measurements were carried out partly
187: at the University of Stuttgart and partly at the infrared
188: beamline of the synchrotron radiation source ANKA in Karlsruhe.
189: A diamond anvil cell equipped with type IIA diamonds suitable
190: for infrared measurements was used to generate pressures up to
191: 20~GPa. To focus the infrared beam onto the small sample in the
192: pressure cell, a Bruker IR Scope II infrared microscope with a
193: 15x magnification objective was used. A field stop of 0.6 mm
194: diameter was chosen, which yields a geometrical spot size of 40
195: $\mu$m on the sample (diffraction effects neglected). The
196: LaTiO$_{3.41}$ crystal was polished to a thickness of
197: $\approx$40 $\mu$m. The reflectivity of the free-standing
198: polished sample was checked and found to be in good agreement
199: with earlier results.\cite{Kuntscher03} A small piece of sample
200: (about 80 \nolinebreak $\mu$m x 80 \nolinebreak $\mu$m) was cut
201: and placed in the hole (150 $\mu$m diameter) of a steel gasket.
202: Finely ground KCl powder was added as a quasi-hydrostatic
203: pressure-transmitting medium. The ruby luminescence method
204: \cite{Mao86} was used for the pressure determination.
205:
206:
207: Polarized reflectivity spectra were measured at the interface
208: between sample and diamond. The measurement geometry is shown
209: in the inset of Fig.\ \ref{Ref-fit} (b). Spectra taken at the
210: inner diamond-air interface of the empty cell served as the
211: reference for normalization of the sample spectra. The absolute
212: reflectivity at the sample-diamond interface, denoted as
213: $R_{s-d}$, was calculated according to $R_{s-d}(\omega)=R_{\rm
214: dia}\times I_{s}(\omega)/I_{d}(\omega)$, where $I_s(\omega)$
215: denotes the intensity spectrum reflected from the
216: sample-diamond interface and $I_d(\omega)$ the reference
217: spectrum of the diamond-air interface. $R_{\rm dia}$ was
218: calculated from the refractive index of diamond $n_{\rm dia}$
219: to 0.167 and assumed to be independent of pressure. This is
220: justified because $n_{\rm dia}$ is known to change only very
221: little with pressure ($\Delta$$n_{\rm dia}$/$\Delta$P =
222: -0.00075/GPa).\cite{Eremets92,Ruoff94} Variations in
223: synchrotron source intensity were taken into account by
224: applying additional normalization procedures. Strain-induced
225: depolarization in the diamond anvil is considered negligible in
226: the pressure range covered in the present experiment.
227:
228:
229: \begin{figure}[t]
230: \includegraphics[width=0.75\columnwidth]{Phonon_b.eps}
231: \caption{Peak position of the phonon mode measured for
232: \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{b}. Different symbols are used for
233: different experimental runs. Up to 14~GPa the mode hardens in a
234: linear fashion, with a linear pressure coefficient of 3.2
235: cm$^{-1}$/GPa. The line is a linear fit of the data points. At
236: around 15~GPa an abrupt change in the frequency of the
237: vibrational feature occurs.} \label{Phonon_b}
238: \end{figure}
239:
240:
241: \begin{figure}[t]
242: \includegraphics[width=0.85\columnwidth]{sigma.eps}
243: \caption{(Color online) Pressure-dependent real part of the
244: optical conductivity of LaTiO$_{3.41}$ for (a) \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{a}
245: and (b) \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{b} at room temperature,
246: obtained by Drude-Lorentz fitting of the reflectivity data. The
247: arrows indicate the changes with increasing pressure. The dotted
248: vertical lines in (b) indicate the frequency positions analyzed in
249: Fig.\ \ref{changes}.}
250: \label{sigma1}
251: \end{figure}
252:
253:
254: \section{Results}
255: \label{sectionresults}
256:
257: The reflectivity spectra of LaTiO$_{3.41}$ for the lowest
258: pressure (0.3~GPa) are shown in Fig.\ \ref{Ref-fit}(a) for
259: \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{a,b}. The region around
260: 2000~cm$^{-1}$ is cut out from the experimental spectra since
261: the diamond multi-phonon absorption causes artifacts in this
262: range. The overall reflectivity of the sample in the diamond
263: anvil cell is lower than that of the free-standing sample
264: \cite{Kuntscher03} due to the smaller refractive index step at
265: the sample-diamond interface.
266:
267:
268: The optical conductivity was obtained by fitting the
269: reflectivity spectra with a Drude-Lorentz model combined with the
270: normal-incidence Fresnel equation
271: \begin{equation}
272: R_{s-d} =\left| \frac{n_{\rm dia}-\sqrt{\epsilon_s}}{n_{\rm
273: dia}+\sqrt{\epsilon_s}}\right|^2 , \epsilon_s = \epsilon_\infty +
274: \frac{i \sigma}{\epsilon_0 \omega} \quad ,
275: \end{equation}
276: where $\epsilon_s$ is the complex dielectric function of the
277: sample. With the 15x objective used in the
278: experiment, the angle of incidence of the radiation at the
279: diamond-sample interface ranges from 4.1$^{\circ}$ to 9.5$^{\circ}$; the
280: average deviation from normal incidence is thus small enough to
281: assume normal incidence for the data analysis. Furthermore, an
282: increase of the background dielectric constant (by 14.5\% at
283: maximum) according to the Clausius-Mossotti relation
284: \cite{Ashcroft76} was assumed in the Drude-Lorentz fits to account
285: for the pressure-induced reduction of the unit cell
286: volume.\cite{Loa04}
287:
288: As an example, we present in Fig.\ \ref{Ref-fit}(a) the
289: Drude-Lorentz fits of the reflectivity spectra for the lowest
290: applied pressure (0.3~GPa); the resulting real part $\sigma_1$
291: of the optical conductivity is shown in Fig.\ \ref{Ref-fit}(b)
292: for both studied polarizations. For fitting the lowest-pressure
293: data, the fitting parameters for the reflectivity spectra of
294: the free-standing sample were used as starting parameters. The
295: resulting optical conductivity spectra at 0.3~GPa [Fig.\
296: \ref{Ref-fit}(b)] are in overall agreement with the
297: ambient-pressure results.\cite{Kuntscher03}
298:
299:
300: For the polarization of the radiation parallel to the
301: conducting axis $a$ the optical conductivity spectrum consists
302: of a pronounced, asymmetric absorption band, located at around
303: 2500 cm$^{-1}$ at 0.3~GPa. For the perpendicular polarization
304: direction, {\bf E}$\parallel$$b$, a phonon mode located at 800
305: cm$^{-1}$ and a broad band centered around 7000 \nolinebreak
306: cm$^{-1}$ are observed for the lowest applied pressure.
307:
308: The polarization-dependent reflectivity spectra R$_{s-d}$ for
309: pressures up to $\approx$20~GPa are presented in Fig.\
310: \ref{R_s-d}. Features around $\omega$=2500~cm$^{-1}$ and 3700
311: cm$^{-1}$ are artifacts originating from multi-phonon
312: absorptions of diamond which are not fully corrected by the
313: normalization procedure.
314: For \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{a} the reflectivity increases
315: continuously with increasing pressure in the whole frequency
316: range studied here. In contrast, for
317: \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{b} the overall reflectivity is
318: almost unchanged up to a pressure of $\approx$15~GPa and only
319: above 15~GPa R$_{s-d}$ increases strongly. Furthermore, the
320: phonon mode located at 800 cm$^{-1}$ in the
321: \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{b} spectrum hardens with increasing
322: pressure [for spectra see inset of Fig.\ \ref{R_s-d} (b)]. In
323: Fig.\ \ref{Phonon_b} the peak position of the phonon mode is
324: shown as a function of applied pressure: Up to 15 \nolinebreak
325: GPa the mode hardens in a linear fashion with a pressure
326: coefficient of $3.2\pm 0.5$~cm$^{-1}$/GPa; at around 15~GPa a
327: discontinuous change in the frequency of the observed spectral
328: feature occurs.
329:
330: \begin{figure}[t]
331: \includegraphics[width=0.85\columnwidth]{MIRint.eps}
332: \caption{Frequency position (filled squares) and spectral weight
333: (open triangles) of the {\bf E}$||$$a$ MIR band as a function of
334: pressure. Dashed lines are guides to the eye.}
335: \label{bandpos}
336: \end{figure}
337:
338:
339: The pressure-dependent real part $\sigma_1$ of the optical
340: conductivity obtained from the Drude-Lorentz fits is presented
341: in Fig.\ \ref{sigma1}. With increasing pressure the MIR band
342: observed in the {\bf E}$\parallel$$a$ optical conductivity
343: shifts to lower frequencies and its oscillator strength
344: increases. This MIR band is superimposed by a relatively narrow
345: peak at $\approx$1200~cm$^{-1}$, whose oscillator strength
346: strongly increases above 15~GPa. For the polarization {\bf
347: E}$\parallel$$b$ gradual changes set in at $\approx 10$~GPa.
348: With increasing pressure the absorption band located at around
349: 7000~cm$^{-1}$ for the lowest pressure looses oscillator
350: strength and the spectral weight moves to the frequency range
351: 4000 to 5000~cm$^{-1}$. A massive redistribution of spectral
352: weight occurs between 14 and 16~GPa. Furthermore, at around
353: $\approx15$~GPa a significant increase of the optical
354: conductivity in the low-frequency part ($<$2000 \nolinebreak
355: cm$^{-1}$) of the \textbf{E}$\parallel$\emph{b} spectrum is
356: observed.
357:
358:
359: Upon releasing pressure, the pressure-dependent trends, e.g.,
360: overall increase of reflectivity for {\bf E}$\parallel$$a$, the
361: sudden change in frequency of the {\bf E}$\parallel$$b$ phonon
362: mode and the redistribution of spectral weight in the high
363: frequency range, are reversible.
364:
365:
366:
367:
368: \section{Discussion} \label{sectiondiscussion}
369:
370: \subsection{Low-pressure regime: $P<15$~GPa}
371:
372: In the low-pressure regime ($P<15$~GPa) the changes in the
373: optical response with increasing pressure are conti\-nu\-ous.
374: In the {\bf E}$||$$b$ optical conductivity spectrum there is a
375: small redistribution of the high-frequency spectral weight near
376: $\approx$7000~cm$^{-1}$ towards lower frequency. That spectral
377: weight may be due to charge transfer excitations, and the
378: pressure-induced redistribution may reflect subtle alterations
379: in the crystal structure,\cite{Loa04} causing changes in the
380: electronic band structure.
381:
382: For {\bf E}$||$$a$ one finds a monotonic redshift and spectral
383: weight growth of the pronounced MIR band with increasing
384: pressure. Based on Drude-Lorentz fits of the reflectivity
385: spectra, the contribution of the MIR band to the optical
386: conductivity was extracted. The zero crossing of the first
387: derivative of this contribution served as an estimate for the
388: frequency position of the band. The so-obtained position of the
389: {\bf E}$||$$a$ MIR band is plotted in Fig.\ \ref{bandpos} as a
390: function of applied pressure. In addition, we show the pressure
391: dependence of its spectral weight which increases by a factor
392: of two for pressures up to 20~GPa.
393:
394: Based on its absolute strength and pressure dependence, the MIR band
395: can be interpreted in terms of (i) excitations of purely electronic
396: character and (ii) excitations involving electron-phonon coupling,
397: i.e., polaronic excitations.
398:
399: For the interpretation of the MIR band in terms of purely
400: electronic excitations, it is instructive to compare the
401: ambient-pressure spectrum of LaTiO$_{3.41}$ with that of the
402: Mott-Hubbard insulator LaTiO$_{3.0}$. For LaTiO$_{3.0}$ the
403: increase of the optical conductivity at around 700 \nolinebreak
404: cm$^{-1}$ is due to excitations from the lower to the upper
405: Hubbard
406: band.\cite{Lunkenheimer03,Arima03,Katsufuji95,Okimoto95,Crandles94}
407: Upon hole doping, additional excitations within the
408: Mott-Hubbard gap were theoretically predicted
409: \cite{Jarrel95,Rozenberg96} and experimentally
410: demonstrated:\cite{Taguchi93,Okimoto95,Katsufuji95} namely, a
411: coherent Drude term and an incoherent MIR band due to
412: transitions between the quasi-particle peak at the Fermi energy
413: to the upper Hubbard band (or from the lower Hubbard band to
414: the quasi-particle peak).
415:
416: In analogy, assuming a Mott-Hubbard picture, LaTiO$_{3.41}$
417: with an electronic configuration 3d$^{0.18}$ is in a highly
418: hole-doped regime, and the {\bf E}$||$$a$ MIR band could be
419: attributed to the predicted incoherent inner-gap excitations.
420: The observed pressure-induced redshift and spectral weight
421: growth of the MIR band reminds one of the doping- or
422: thermally-induced changes of the incoherent MIR band in
423: Mott-Hubbard systems. \cite{Imada98} Accordingly, the
424: pressure-induced effects in LaTiO$_{3.41}$ could be attributed
425: to the bandwidth-controlled delocalization of charges.
426:
427: It is interesting to compare the crystal structure of
428: LaTiO$_{3.41}$ with that of the Mott-Hubbard system
429: LaTiO$_{3.0}$:\cite{Cwik03} At ambient conditions, the crystal
430: structure of LaTiO$_{3.0}$ is of the orthorhombic
431: GdFeO$_3$-type with characteristic tiltings and distortions of
432: the TiO$_6$ octahedra. The Ti-O1 bond length and Ti-O1-Ti bond
433: angle (with O1 denoting the apex oxygen ion) influence the $3d$
434: electron bandwidth,\cite{Taguchi93} and amount to 2.03 \AA\ and
435: 154$^{\circ}$, respectively.\cite{Cwik03} A three-dimensional
436: network of tilted and distorted TiO$_6$ octahedra is also
437: present in LaTiO$_{3.41}$ within an ($a$,$b$)-slab. Each slab
438: consists of five chains of TiO$_6$ octahedra along the $a$ axis
439: and connected via their apical oxygen ions. Within a slab, the
440: octahedral tiltings and distortions are not homogeneous, but
441: the largest average Ti-O1-Ti bond angle (163$^{\circ}$) and
442: smallest average Ti-O1 bond length (1.99 \AA) are present
443: within the chain at the symmetrical position in the middle of
444: the slab. Interestingly, in LaTiO$_{3.0}$ a pressure-induced
445: insulator-to-metal transition is observed for Ti-O1 bond
446: lengths just below 2 \nolinebreak \AA. \cite{Loa05}
447: This suggests that in LaTiO$_{3.41}$ the central chains within
448: the slabs play a key role for the observed conducting properties
449: of this compound.
450:
451:
452:
453: The other scenario for the interpretation of the pronounced
454: asymmetric {\bf E}$||$$a$ MIR absorption band of LaTiO$_{3.41}$
455: is in terms of an optical signature of polaronic
456: quasi-particles that are formed due to electron-phonon
457: interaction.\cite{Emin93} Within a polaronic picture, the
458: frequency position of the MIR band is a measure of the polaronic
459: binding energy and thus of the electron-phonon coupling
460: strength. Such a MIR absorption band was found in several
461: well-studied materials, like
462: cuprates,\cite{Bi93a,Falck93,Calvani96b,Lupi98,Lupi99}
463: manganites,\cite{Calvani96a,Kim98,Hartinger04} and
464: nickelates.\cite{Bi93a,Calvani96a,Bi93b,Crandles93} Also
465: several titanium oxides show the characteristic absorption
466: feature of polarons in the MIR frequency
467: range,\cite{Bogomolov68,Gerthsen65,Eagles84,Calvani93,Kabanov95}
468: and also for LaTiO$_{3.41}$ such a picture had been suggested
469: to explain the pronounced MIR band for {\bf
470: E}$||$$a$.\cite{Kuntscher03}
471:
472: In the case of the manganites it was demonstrated that the MIR
473: band is very sensitive to the application of chemical or
474: external pressure, see e.g.
475: Refs.~\onlinecite{Loa01,Congeduti01,Postorino03}. In the case
476: of doped manganites\cite{Congeduti01,Postorino03}, pressure
477: effects were attributed to tuning the strength of the
478: electron-phonon coupling and thus the extent of the
479: localization of the charges. In general, a broadening of the
480: electronic bands, i.e., an enhancement of the electron
481: itineracy, and a stiffening of the lattice is expected upon
482: pressure application. As a consequence, the electron-phonon
483: coupling and therefore the polaronic binding energy should
484: decrease. So a shift of the MIR band to lower energies and an
485: increase of the oscillator strength, indicating an enhanced
486: delocalization of the charge carriers, are then expected. This
487: is in agreement with the observed pressure-induced changes of
488: the MIR absorption feature in LaTiO$_{3.41}$ [see Figs.\
489: \ref{sigma1}(a) and \ref{bandpos}].
490:
491:
492: \begin{figure}[t]
493: \includegraphics[width=0.85\columnwidth]{sigma_ch}
494: \caption{Real part of the {\bf E}$||$$b$ optical conductivity
495: at three different frequencies (1600, 4600, and 7400~cm$^{-1}$)
496: as a function of pressure (extracted from Fig.\ \ref{sigma1}).
497: The dotted vertical line indicates the pressure where the
498: structural phase transition reported earlier \cite{Loa04}
499: occurs in the optical present optical study. Dashed lines are
500: guides to the eye.} \label{changes}
501: \end{figure}
502:
503:
504:
505: Thus, based on the pressure dependence of the MIR band it is difficult to
506: draw a conclusion on the question whether this absorption feature
507: is to be explained by a Mott-Hubbard or a polaronic scenario.
508: For both the Mott-Hubbard and the polaron model several examples exist,
509: where the distinct doping dependences of the spectral features were demonstrated.
510: \cite{{Katsufuji95,Taguchi93,Calvani96b,Lupi99,Bi93b}} Thus, also in the
511: case of the titanate LaTiO$_{3.41}$ the doping dependence of the MIR
512: absorption band might be an important additional piece of information.
513: Further insight could be obtained by a detailed lineshape analysis of
514: the absorption band.
515:
516:
517:
518: \subsection{High-pressure regime: $P>15$~GPa}
519:
520: Near 15~GPa we observe discontinuous changes in the optical
521: response: (i) The oscillator strength of the narrow peak
522: superposing the MIR band for the po\-la\-ri\-zation {\bf
523: E}$||$$a$ increases. (ii) For {\bf E}$||$$b$ a pronounced
524: redistribution of spectral weight from high ($\approx$7400
525: cm$^{-1}$) to lower ($\approx$4600~cm$^{-1}$) frequencies
526: occurs, indicating the shift of the broad {\bf E}$||$$b$
527: excitation band. (iii) There is a sudden change in frequency of
528: the vibrational excitation showing up in the MIR spectra (see
529: Fig.\ \ref{Phonon_b}). (iv) In the low-frequency part
530: ($\omega$$<$2000~cm$^{-1}$) the optical conductivity
531: perpendicular to the chains, {\bf E}$||$$b$, remains almost
532: constant in the lower pressure range, and starts to increase
533: above $\approx$15~GPa (see changes at 1600 cm$^{-1}$
534: illustrated in Fig.\ \ref{changes}).
535:
536:
537: These discontinuities are most probably related to the
538: pressure-induced structural phase transition, which was
539: observed at 18~GPa by x-ray diffraction measurements under more
540: hydrostatic conditions.\cite{Loa04} Due to the large number of
541: overlapping reflections, the high-pressure crystal structure
542: could not be determined; a reversible distortion of the
543: low-pressure crystal structure was suggested.\cite{Loa04}
544: According to our optical data, the structural transition
545: affects both the vibrational and electronic excitations of the
546: system. Above the phase transition, i.e., for $P>15$~GPa, the
547: broad {\bf E}$||$$b$ excitation band is located at
548: $\approx$5000~cm$^{-1}$ and remains almost unchanged when
549: increasing the pressure.
550:
551: The abrupt increase of the low-frequency part
552: ($\omega<2000$~cm$^{-1}$) of the optical conductivity spectrum
553: {\it perpendicular} to the chains deserves special attention.
554: It cannot be simply explained by the redshift of the
555: higher-lying broad band. An additional oscillator below
556: 2000~cm$^{-1}$ needs to be included to describe the
557: high-pressure (i.e., $P>15$~GPa) reflectivity spectra with the
558: Drude-Lorentz model. This suggests the onset of a
559: pressure-induced dimensional crossover of the system at 15~GPa,
560: i.e., a significant increase of the hopping integral
561: perpendicular to the chains. However, the anisotropy of the
562: material is preserved up to the highest applied pressure
563: (19.5~GPa), since the overall optical conductivity for {\bf
564: E}$||$$a$ remains higher compared to {\bf E}$||$$b$.
565:
566:
567: \section{Summary}
568:
569: We studied the polarization-dependent mid-infrared reflectivity
570: of the quasi-1D conducting titanate LaTiO$_{3.41}$ as a
571: function of pressure. Below 15~GPa the changes with increasing
572: pressure are continuous for both polarizations studied: For
573: {\bf E}$\parallel$$a$ the overall reflectivity increases; the
574: corresponding optical conductivity contains a pronounced MIR
575: absorption band showing a redshift and an increase of spectral
576: weight with increasing pressure. Based on its pressure
577: dependence, this MIR band can be interpreted in terms of
578: electronic transitions within a Mott-Hubbard picture in the
579: hole-doped regime, but the pressure-induced changes may also be
580: consistent with an interpretation in terms of polaronic
581: excitations. Additional information, like the doping dependence,
582: is called for, in order to be able to distinguish between the two
583: possible scenarios.
584: For {\bf E}$\parallel$$b$ almost no change in the
585: reflectivity spectra is induced with increasing pressure up to
586: 15~GPa; only a small redistribution of spectral weight towards
587: lower frequencies is observed.
588:
589: Near 15~GPa, discontinuous changes are clearly observed in the
590: optical response. However, the optical anisotropy of the
591: low-pressure phase persists in the regime of the high-pressure
592: phase. This indicates a well-defined orientational relationship
593: between low-pressure and high-pressure phases. The dominant
594: change of the optical response at the phase transition occurs
595: for {\bf E}$\parallel$$b$: a pronounced redshift of the
596: excitation band, a sudden change in frequency of the phonon
597: mode, and an increase of the low-frequency optical
598: conductivity. These changes can be related to the recently
599: observed\cite{Loa04} pressure-induced structural phase
600: transition, which alters the electronic band structure and
601: induces the onset of a dimensional crossover in this highly
602: anisotropic system.
603:
604:
605: \subsection*{Acknowledgements}
606: We thank M. Dressel, S. Schuppler, and H. Winter for fruitful
607: discussions and G. Untereiner for technical assistance. We
608: acknowledge the ANKA Angstr\"omquelle Karlsruhe for the provision
609: of beamtime and we would like to thank D. Moss, Y.-L. Mathis,
610: B. Gasharova, and M. S\"upfle for assistance using the beamline ANKA-IR.
611: Financial support by the BMBF (project No.\ 13N6918/1) and the DFG (Emmy
612: Noether-program) is acknowledged.
613:
614:
615: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
616: \item[$^*$] Email: kuntscher@pi1.physik.uni- stuttgart.de
617:
618: \bibitem{Mochizuki04a}
619: M. Mochizuki and M. Imada,
620: New J. Phys.\ {\bf 6}, 154 (2004); and references therein.
621:
622: \bibitem{Khaliullin00}
623: G. Khaliullin and S. Maekawa,
624: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 85}, 3950 (2000).
625:
626: \bibitem{Keimer00}
627: B. Keimer, D. Casa, A. Ivanov, J. W. Lynn, M. v. Zimmermann, J. P. Hill, D. Gibbs,
628: Y. Taguchi, and Y. Tokura,
629: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 85}, 3946 (2000).
630:
631: \bibitem{Cwik03}
632: M. Cwik, T. Lorenz, J. Baier, R. M\"uller, G. Andr\'e, F.
633: Bour\'ee, F. Lichtenberg, A. Freimuth, R. Schmitz, E.
634: M\"uller-Hartmann, and M. Braden, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 68}, 060401(R) (2003).
635:
636: \bibitem{Mochizuki03}
637: M. Mochizuki and M. Imada, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91}, 167203 (2003).
638:
639: \bibitem{Hemberger03}
640: J. Hemberger, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, V. Fritsch, J. Deisenhofer, S. Lobina,
641: T. Rudolf, P. Lunkenheimer, F. Lichtenberg, A. Loidl, D. Bruns, and B. B\"uchner,
642: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91}, 066403 (2003).
643:
644: \bibitem{Kiyama03}
645: T. Kiyama and M. Itoh,
646: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91}, 167202 (2003).
647:
648: \bibitem{Pavarini04}
649: E. Pavarini, S. Biermann, A. Poteryaev, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. Georges, and
650: O. K. Andersen,
651: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 92}, 176403 (2004).
652:
653: \bibitem{Haverkort05}
654: M. W. Haverkort, Z. Hu, A. Tanaka, G. Ghiringhelli, H. Roth, M. Cwik, T. Lorenz,
655: C. Sch\"ussler-Langeheine, S. V. Streltsov, A. S. Mylnikova, V. I. Anisimov, C. de Nadai,
656: N. B. Brookes, H. H. Hsieh, H.-J. Lin, C. T. Chen, T. Mizokawa, Y. Taguchi,
657: Y. Tokura, D. I. Khomskii, and L. H. Tjeng,
658: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 94}, 056401 (2005).
659:
660: \bibitem{Ruckkamp05}
661: R. R\"uckamp, E. Benckiser, M.W. Haverkort, H. Roth, T. Lorenz, A. Freimuth, L. Jongen,
662: A. M\"oller, G. Meyer, P. Reutler, B. B\"uchner, A. Revcolevschi, S.-W. Cheong, C. Sekar,
663: G. Krabbes, M. Gr\"uninger, New J. Phys.\ {\bf 7}, 144 (2005).
664:
665: \bibitem{Ulrich05}
666: C. Ulrich, A. G\"ossling, M. Gr\"uninger, M. Guennou, H. Roth, M. Cwik, T. Lorenz,
667: G. Khaliullin, and B. Keimer,
668: cond-mat/0503106.
669:
670: \bibitem{Nanamatsu74}
671: S. Nanamatsu, M. Kimura, K. Doi, S. Matsushita, and N. Yamada,
672: Ferroelectrics {\bf 8}, 511 (1974).
673:
674: \bibitem{Lichtenberg01}
675: F. Lichtenberg, A. Herrnberger, K. Wiedenmann, and J. Mannhart,
676: Prog. Solid State Chem. {\bf 29}, 1 (2001).
677:
678: \bibitem{Kuntscher03}
679: C. A. Kuntscher, D. van der Marel, M. Dressel, F. Lichtenberg, and J. Mannhart,
680: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 67}, 035105 (2003).
681:
682: \bibitem{Daniels03}
683: P. Daniels, F. Lichtenberg, and S. van Smaalen, Acta Crystallogr.,
684: Sect. C: Struct. Commun. {\bf 59}, i15 (2003).
685:
686: \bibitem{Loa04}
687: I. Loa, K. Syassen, X. Wang, F. Lichtenberg, M. Hanfland, and C.
688: A. Kuntscher, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 69}, 224105 (2004).
689:
690: \bibitem{Mao86}
691: H. K Mao, J. Xu, and P.M. Bell, J.Geophys. Res [Atmos.]{\bf 91},
692: 4673 (1986).
693:
694: \bibitem{Eremets92}
695: M. I. Eremets and Y. A. Timofeev,
696: Rev.\ Scient.\ Instrum.\ {\bf 63}, 3123 (1992).
697:
698: \bibitem{Ruoff94}
699: A. L. Ruoff and K. Ghandehari, in S. C. Schmidt, J. W. Shaner, G. A. Samara, and M. Ross (Eds.),
700: High Pressure Science and Technology, pp.\ 1523-1525, American Institute of Physics Conference
701: Proceedings 309, Woodbury, N.Y. (1994).
702:
703: \bibitem{Ashcroft76}
704: N.W. Ashcroft and N.D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, Harcourt Brace College Publishers,
705: Fort Worth (1976).
706:
707: \bibitem{Lunkenheimer03}
708: P. Lunkenheimer, T. Rudolf, J. Hemberger, A. Pimenov, S. Tachos, F. Lichtenberg,
709: and A. Loidl, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 68}, 245108 (2003).
710:
711: \bibitem{Arima03}
712: T. Arima, Y. Tokura, and J. B. Torrance,
713: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 48}, 17006 (1993).
714:
715: \bibitem{Katsufuji95}
716: T. Katsufuji, Y. Okimoto, and Y. Tokura,
717: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 3497 (1995).
718:
719: \bibitem{Okimoto95}
720: Y. Okimoto, T. Katsufuji, Y. Okada, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura,
721: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 51}, 9581 (1995).
722:
723: \bibitem{Crandles94}
724: D. A. Crandles, T. Timusk, J. D. Garrett, and J. E. Greedan,
725: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 49}, 16207 (1994).
726:
727: \bibitem{Jarrel95}
728: M. Jarrell, J. K. Freericks, and Th. Pruschke,
729: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 51}, 11704 (1995).
730:
731: \bibitem{Rozenberg96}
732: M. J. Rozenberg, G. Kotliar, and H. H. Kajueter,
733: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 54}, 8452 (1996).
734:
735: \bibitem{Taguchi93}
736: Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, T. Arima, and F. Inaba,
737: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 48}, 511 (1993).
738:
739: \bibitem{Imada98}
740: M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura,
741: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 70}, 1039 (1998).
742:
743: \bibitem{Loa05}
744: I. Loa, K. Syassen, X. Wang, H. Roth, and T. Lorenz,
745: unpublished.
746:
747: \bibitem{Emin93}
748: D. Emin, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 48}, 13691 (1993).
749:
750: \bibitem{Bi93a}
751: X.-X. Bi and P. C. Eklund, Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 70}, 2625 (1993).
752:
753: \bibitem{Falck93}
754: J. P. Falck, A. Levy, M. A. Kastner, and R. J. Birgeneau
755: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 48}, 4043 (1993).
756:
757: \bibitem{Calvani96b}
758: P. Calvani, M. Capizzi, S. Lupi, P. Maselli, A. Paolone, and P. Roy,
759: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 53}, 2756 (1996).
760:
761: \bibitem{Lupi98}
762: S. Lupi, M. Capizzi, P. Calvani, B. Ruzicka, P. Maselli, P. Dore, and A. Paolone,
763: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 57}, 1248 (1998).
764:
765: \bibitem{Lupi99}
766: S. Lupi, P. Maselli, M. Capizzi, P. Calvani, P. Giura, and P. Roy,
767: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 83}, 4852 (1999).
768:
769: \bibitem{Calvani96a}
770: P. Calvani, A. Paolone, P. Dore, S. Lupi, P. Maselli, P. G. Medaglia, and S -W. Cheong,
771: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 54}, R9592 (1996).
772:
773: \bibitem{Kim98}
774: K. H. Kim, J. H. Jung, and T. W. No,
775: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81}, 1517 (1998).
776:
777: \bibitem{Hartinger04}
778: Ch.\ Hartinger, F. Mayr, J. Deisenhofer, A. Loidl, and T. Kopp,
779: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 69}, 100403 (2004).
780:
781: \bibitem{Bi93b}
782: X.-X. Bi, P. C. Eklund, and J. M. Honig, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 48}, 3470 (1993).
783:
784: \bibitem{Crandles93}
785: D. A. Crandles, T. Timusk, J. D. Garret, and J. E. Greedan,
786: Physica C {\bf 216}, 94 (1993).
787:
788: \bibitem{Bogomolov68}
789: V. N. Bogomolov and D. N. Mirlin, Phys.\ Stat.\ Sol.\ {\bf 27}, 443 (1968);
790: V. N. Bogomolov, E. K. Kudinov, D. N. Mirlin, and Ju.\ A. Firsov,
791: Sov.\ Phys.\ Solid State {\bf 9} 1630 (1968).
792:
793: \bibitem{Gerthsen65}
794: P. Gerthsen, R. Groth, K. H. Hardtl, D. Heese, and H. G. Reik,
795: Solid State Commun.\ {\bf 3}, 165 (1965).
796:
797: \bibitem{Eagles84}
798: D. M. Eagles and P. Lalousis, J. Phys.\ C: Solid State Phys.\ {\bf 17}, 655 (1984).
799:
800: \bibitem{Calvani93}
801: P. Calvani, M. Capizzi, F. Donato, S. Lupi, P. Maselli, and D. Peschiaroli,
802: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 47}, 8917 (1993).
803:
804: \bibitem{Kabanov95}
805: V. V. Kabanov and D. K. Ray, Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 52}, 13021 (1995).
806:
807: \bibitem{Loa01}
808: I. Loa, P. Adler, A. Grzechnik, K. Syassen, U. Schwarz, M.
809: Hanfland, G. Kh. Rozenberg, P. Gorodetsky, and M. P. Pasternak,
810: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{87}, 125501 (2001).
811:
812: \bibitem{Congeduti01}
813: A. Congeduti, P. Postorino, P. Dore, A. Nucara, S. Lupi, S. Mercone, P. Calvani,
814: A. Kumar, and D. D. Sarma,
815: Phys.\ Rev.\ B {\bf 63}, 184410 (2001).
816:
817: \bibitem{Postorino03}
818: P. Postorino, A. Congeduti, P. Dore, A. Sacchetti, F. Gorelli, L. Ulivi, A. Kumar,
819: and D. D. Sarma,
820: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 91}, 175501 (2003).
821:
822:
823: \end{thebibliography}
824:
825: \end{document}
826: