1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING %
3: % %
4: % `Preparing an article for publication in an Institute of Physics %
5: % Publishing journal using LaTeX' %
6: % %
7: % LaTeX source code `ioplau2e.tex' used to generate `author %
8: % guidelines', the documentation explaining and demonstrating use %
9: % of the Institute of Physics Publishing LaTeX preprint files %
10: % `iopart.cls, iopart12.clo and iopart10.clo'. %
11: % %
12: % `ioplau2e.tex' itself uses LaTeX with `iopart.cls' %
13: % %
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %
16: %
17: % First we have a character check
18: %
19: % ! exclamation mark " double quote
20: % # hash ` opening quote (grave)
21: % & ampersand ' closing quote (acute)
22: % $ dollar % percent
23: % ( open parenthesis ) close paren.
24: % - hyphen = equals sign
25: % | vertical bar ~ tilde
26: % @ at sign _ underscore
27: % { open curly brace } close curly
28: % [ open square ] close square bracket
29: % + plus sign ; semi-colon
30: % * asterisk : colon
31: % < open angle bracket > close angle
32: % , comma . full stop
33: % ? question mark / forward slash
34: % \ backslash ^ circumflex
35: %
36: % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
37: % abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
38: % 1234567890
39: %
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: %
42: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
43: \newcommand{\gguide}{{\it Preparing graphics for IOP journals}}
44: %Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required
45: %\usepackage{iopams}
46: \usepackage{graphicx}
47:
48: \begin{document}
49:
50: \title{Influence of Preparation Process on Microstructure, Critical Current Density and T$_{c}$ of MgB$_{2}$/Fe/Cu
51: Wires}
52:
53: {Y.~F.~Wu$^1$\footnote[1]{To whom correspondence should be addressed
54: (wyf7777@tom.com)}, G.~Yan$^1$, J.~S.~Li$^2$, Y.~Feng$^1$,
55: S.~K.~Chen$^1$, H.~P.~Tang$^1$, H.~L.~Xu$^3$, C.~S.~Li$^1$, P.~X.~
56: Zhang$^1$, Y.~F.~Lu$^1$}
57:
58: \address{$^1$ Northwest Institute for Nonferrous Metal Research, P. O. Box 51, Xian, Shaanxi 710016, P. R. China}
59: \address{$^2$ Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710012, P.R.China}
60: \address{$^3$ School of Material Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, People¡¯s Republic of
61: China}
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: The powder-in-tube MgB$_{2}$ wires were prepared by high energy
65: milling of Mg and B powder. The powder was not mechanically alloyed
66: for 2h short milling time. However, the MgB$_{2}$ grains in wires
67: are very small (20~100nm) and resembled to the dimple after
68: post-heat treatment. The clear evidence for transcrystlline fracture
69: is observed. It indicated that the grain connection was greatly
70: improved and the fluxing pinning was significantly enhanced. Another
71: point to view is no intermediate annealing was adopted during the
72: whole rolling process. The influence of the post-heat treatment on
73: the transport current density was studied. Despite the lower T$_{c}$
74: of about 35K, the transport current density reaches to
75: 3$\times\,$10$^{4}$A/cm$^{2}$ at 15K and 3.5T for
76: $700\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ sintered wires.
77:
78: \end{abstract}
79:
80: %Uncomment for PACS numbers title message
81: %\pacs{00.00, 20.00, 42.10}
82: % Keywords required only for MST, PB, PMB, PM, JOA, JOB?
83: %\vspace{2pc}
84: %\noindent{\it Keywords}: Article preparation, IOP journals
85: % Uncomment for Submitted to journal title message
86: %\submitto{\JPA}
87: % Comment out if separate title page not required
88:
89: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
90: \pacs{74.70.Ad, 74.62.Bf, 74.25.Qt, 74.25.Sv, 74.50.+r, 74.70.-b}
91:
92: %74. Superconductivity (for superconducting devices, see 85.25.-j)
93:
94: %74.25.Bt Thermodynamic properties
95:
96: %74.25.Fy Transport properties (electric and thermal conductivity, thermoelectric effects, etc.)
97:
98: %74.25.Ha Magnetic properties
99:
100: %74.25.Ld Mechanical and acoustical properties, elasticity, and ultrasonic attenuation
101:
102: %74.25.Nf Response to electromagnetic fields (nuclear magnetic resonance, surface impedance, etc.)
103:
104: %74.25.Op Mixed states, critical fields, and surface sheaths
105:
106: %74.25.Qt Vortex lattices, flux pinning, flux creep
107:
108: %74.25.Sv Critical currents
109:
110: %74.50.+r Tunneling phenomena; point contacts, weak links, Josephson effects (for SQUIDs, see 85.25.Dq; for Josephson devices, see 85.25.Cp; for Josephson junction arrays, see 74.81.Fa)
111:
112: %74.62.-c Transition temperature variations
113:
114: %74.62.Bf Effects of material synthesis, crystal structure, and chemical composition
115:
116: %74.62.Dh Effects of crystal defects, doping and substitution
117:
118: %74.62.Fj Pressure effects
119:
120: %74.70.-b Superconducting materials (for cuprates, see 74.72.-h)
121:
122: %74.70.Ad Metals; alloys and binary compounds (including A15, MgB2,etc.)
123:
124: \maketitle
125:
126:
127:
128: \section{Introduction}
129: Preparation of MgB$_{2}$ wires depends very critically on the
130: precursor powder used for the powder-in-tube (PIT) techniques. Small
131: grain sizes are favored preconditions for achieving high quality
132: wires. Mechanical alloying (MA) technique for MgB$_{2}$ powder
133: preparation is expected for obtaining enhanced magnetic flux pinning
134: by microstructure refinement. However, it costs as long as
135: 20~100h[1,2,3-8] for in situ MA precursor powder preparation. The
136: use of short-time unalloyed high energy milling of Mg and B powder
137: as precursor material represents an efficient combination between
138: conventional powder preparation and mechanical alloying techniques.
139: Fe sheath was considered as one of suitable materials however hard
140: it is. It is also gradually recognized that repeated annealing
141: during rolling process would cause the inevitable diffusion of
142: oxygen into the filament of MgB$_{2}$ wire and decrease J$_{c}$
143: greatly. Therefore, how to reduce intermediate annealing steps
144: during material preparation become one of the biggest challenges as
145: literatures[8-10] referred to.
146:
147: \section{Experimental details}
148: Mg(99.8\%) and amorphous B (95\%) powder with 5\% Mg surplus were
149: filled under purified Ar-atmosphere into an agate milling container
150: and milling media. The milling was performed on a SPEX 8000M mill
151: for 2h using a ball-to-powder mass ratio of 3. Monofilamentary wires
152: were prepared by conventional PIT method. The powder was packed into
153: coaxial Cu/Fe tubes (outer diameter 14 mm and inner diameter 7 mm)
154: forming the billets. Next, billets were groove-rolled and drawn to a
155: wire diameter of 1.2mm without any intermediate annealing. The post
156: heat treatment was performed at different temperatures for 1 hour
157: under ultra-high purity Ar-atmosphere. The phase content of
158: MgB$_{2}$ was analysed by x-ray diffraction scans performed on a
159: Philips APD1700 diffractometer with Cu K¦Á radiation. The surface
160: morphology and microstructures of the samples were characterized by
161: JSM-6700F scanning electron microscope. The superconducting
162: transition temperature, T$_{c}$, was obtained by
163: resistance-temperature method. The critical currents were evaluated
164: from V-I curves taking a 1¦ÌV cm$^{-1}$ criterion.
165:
166: \section{Results and discussion}
167: As we know, the ductile deformation behavior at low temperatures is
168: favored for acquiring high J$_{c}$ performance MgB$_{2}$ wires. In
169: our study, no intermediate annealing was adopted during the whole
170: rolling process. The total working modulus of Fe sheath exceeds 99
171: percent. A typical cross section for wire diameter of 1.2 mm is
172: shown in figure 1. We concluded from our experience that the
173: reduction in pass and rolling rate during rolling process should be
174: controlled to a lower lever.
175:
176: The microstructures of samples sintered at different temperatures
177: are shown in Fig.2. The Scanning electron microscope images mainly
178: show dimple-like grains for $700~800\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ sintered
179: samples. The grain sizes are about 20 ~ 100nm for
180: $700\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ and $750\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ sintered
181: samples. The clear evidence for the transcrystlline fracture is
182: observed. It indicated that the grain connectivity was enhanced
183: greatly. The grains are grown up to 100~250nm for
184: $800\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ sintered sample. While for
185: $650\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ reacted sample, large plate-like column
186: crystals were observed. The impurity phases are evidently observed
187: for sample sintered at $800\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$. Fig.3 shows the
188: wrap-around distribution of the second phases of the
189: $800\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ sintered sample. EDX analysis indicates
190: that the bright one is O-rich zone and the grey one is Mg-rich
191: zone,as seen in fig.4.
192:
193: Fig.5 indicates the superconducting transition T$_{c}$ by resistance
194: measurement for the samples sintered at different temperatures. As
195: we can see, all samples have sharp transitions. T$_{c}$ of the high
196: energy milling samples ranged from 34.5 to 35.5 K, which is much
197: lower than 39K. Most likely, this is not due to a deviation from the
198: ideal stoichiometry of the superconducting compound[2]. From x-ray
199: analysis, interaction between the constituents of precursor powder
200: and the sheath material can also be excluded. It seems that the
201: suppression of T$_{c}$ is caused by oxygen contamination in grain
202: boundary induced by high energy milling as well as sintering
203: process.
204:
205: Fig.6 shows the \textit{J$_{c}$-{B}} curve of the MgB$_{2}$ wires at
206: different temperatures. The critical currents were evaluated from
207: V-I curves taking a 1¦ÌV cm$^{-1}$ criterion. As we can see, the
208: critical current densities are influenced greatly by heat treatment.
209: The higher or lower heat treatment induced second phases and
210: inferior microstructure, which led to bad grain connectivity and
211: contribute to dramatic decrease of \textit{J$_{c}$}. In the lower
212: field, the MgB$_{2}$ wires sintered at $700\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$
213: show the higher critical current density. In the higher field, the
214: MgB$_{2}$ wires sintered at $750\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ show the
215: higher critical current density. The critical current density
216: reaches to 3$\times\,$10$^{4}$A/cm$^{2}$ at 15K and 3.5T for the
217: wire sintered at $700\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$.
218:
219: In Summary, we succeeded in preparing high critical current density
220: MgB$_{2}$ wire using unalloyed high energy milling precursor powder.
221: The powder preparation process was greatly shortened. It
222: demonstrated that it is an effective approach to get fine
223: crystalline MgB$_{2}$ with good grain connectivity and high
224: \textit{J$_{c}$} performance. The critical current density reaches
225: to 3$\times\,$10$^{4}$A/cm$^{2}$ at 15K and 3.5T for the wire
226: sintered at $700\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$.
227:
228:
229: \section{Acknowledge}
230: This work was partially supported by National Natural Science
231: Foundation project (contract No. 50472099) and National Basic
232: Research Program of China (contract No. 2006CB601004).
233:
234: \newpage
235: \section*{References}
236: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
237: \bibitem{book1}V.N. Narozhnyi, G. Fuchs, A, Handstein, A. Gumbel, J. Eckert,
238: K. Nenkov, D. Hinz, O. Gutfleisch, A. Walte, L. N. Bogacheva, I. E.
239: Kostyleva, K.-H. Muller, L. Schultz, Int. Conf. on
240: Superconductivity, CMR \& Related Materials: Novel Trends
241: (SCRM2002), Giens, France, 1-8 June 2002.
242:
243: \bibitem{book2}A. Gumbel, O. Perner, J. Eckert, G. Fuchs, K. Nenkov,
244: K.-H. Muller, and L. Schultz, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED
245: SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, Vol. 13, No. 2, JUNE 2003.
246:
247: \bibitem{book3}A. Gumbel, J. Eckert, G. Fuchs, K. Nenkov, K.-H. Muller and L. Schultz,
248: APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, Vol. 80, No. 15, 15 APRIL 2002, pp.2725-2727.
249:
250: \bibitem{book4}W. Ha¦Âler, C. Roding, C. Fischer, B. Holzapfel, O. Perner, J. Eckert, K. Nenkov
251: and G. Fuchs, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16 (2003) pp.281-284.
252:
253: \bibitem{book5}C. Fischer, C. Roding, W. Ha¦Âler, O. Perner, J. Eckert, K. Nenkov, G. Fuchs,
254: H. Wendrock, B. Holzapfel and L. Schultz, APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS,
255: Vol. 83, No. 9, 1 SEPTEMBER 2003, pp.1803-1805.
256:
257: \bibitem{book6}O. Perner, J. Eckert, W. Ha¦Âler, C. Fischer, K-H Muller, G. Fuchs, B Holzapfel and
258: L Schultz, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 17 (2004) pp.1148-1153.
259:
260: \bibitem{book7}Olaf Perner, Wolfgang Ha¦Âler, Claus Fischer, Gunter Fuchs, Bernhard Holzapfel,
261: Ludwig Schultz and Jurgen Eckert, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED
262: SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, VOL. 15, NO. 2, JUNE 2005.
263:
264: \bibitem{book8}O. Perner, J. Eckert, W. Ha¦Âler, C. Fischer, J. Acker, T. Gemming, G. Fuchs,
265: B. Holzapfel and L. Schultz, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 97,
266: 056105(2005), pp.1-3.
267:
268: \bibitem{book9}C. Buzea and T. Yamashita, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 14, R 115 (2001).
269:
270: \bibitem{book10}V. N. Narozhnyi, G. Fuchs, A. Handstein, A. G¨¹mbel, J. Eckert, K. Nenkov,
271: D. Hinz, O. Gutfleisch, A. W?lte, L. N. Bogacheva, I. E. Kostyleva,
272: K.-H. M¨¹ller, and L. Schultz, J. Supercond. 15, 599 (2002)
273:
274: \end{thebibliography}
275:
276:
277:
278:
279: \newpage
280: \textbf{Figure captions}
281:
282:
283:
284: Fig. 1 A typical cross section for wire diameter of 1.2 mm.
285:
286: Fig.2 The Scanning electron microscope images of samples sintered at
287: different temperatures: (a)$650\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$;
288: (b)$700\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$; (c)$750\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ and
289: (d)$800\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$.
290:
291: Fig.3 The wrap-around distribution of the second phases for
292: $800\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ sintered MgB$_{2}$ wires.
293:
294: Fig.4 The EDX analysis of the second phases for
295: $800\,^{\circ}\mathrm{c}$ sintered MgB$_{2}$ wires. It shows: (a)
296: the bright one is O-rich zone; (b) the grey one is Mg-rich zone.
297:
298: Fig.5 Superconducting transition T$_{c}$ by resistance measurement
299: for the samples sintered at different temperatures.
300:
301: Fig.6 Transport \textit{J$_{c}$-B} curve of the MgB$_{2}$ wires at
302: different temperatures.
303:
304: \newpage
305: Fig.1
306: %\section{A typical cross section for wire diameter of 1.2mm}
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 1 A typical cross section for wire diameter of 1.2mm %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
308: \begin{figure}[hp]
309: \centering
310: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{crosec.eps}
311: \end{figure}
312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
313:
314: \newpage
315: Fig.2
316: %\section{SEM for diff temperatures}
317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 2 SEM for diff temperatures %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
318: \begin{figure}[hp]
319: \centering
320: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{650wire.eps}%
321: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{700wire.eps}
322: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{750wire.eps}%
323: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{800wire.eps}
324: \end{figure}
325:
326: \newpage
327: Fig.3
328: %\section{EDX for Second phase for 800¡æ sintered sample}
329: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 3 EDX for Second phase for 800¡æ sintered sample %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
330: \begin{figure}[hp]
331: \centering
332: \includegraphics[width=250pt]{wrap.eps}
333: \end{figure}
334:
335: \newpage
336: Fig.4
337: %\section{Wrap-around distribution of 800¡æ sintered sample}
338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 4 Wrap-around distribution of 800¡æ sintered sample %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
339: \begin{figure}[hp]
340: \centering
341: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{bright1.eps}%
342: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{bright2.eps}
343: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{grey1.eps}%
344: \includegraphics[width=200pt]{grey2.eps}
345: \end{figure}
346:
347: \newpage
348: Fig.5
349: %\section{R-T}
350: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 5 R-T %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
351: \begin{figure}[hp]
352: \centering
353: \includegraphics[width=300pt]{RT.eps}%
354: \end{figure}
355:
356: \newpage
357: Fig.6
358: %\section{Jc-H}
359: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE 6 Jc-H %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
360: \begin{figure}[hp]
361: \centering
362: \includegraphics[width=300pt]{JcH.eps}%
363: \end{figure}
364:
365: \end{document}
366: