1: \documentclass
2: [twocolumn,prl,superscriptaddress,tightenlines,lengthcheck]{revtex4}%
3: \usepackage{amsfonts}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}%
7: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
8: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=latex2.dll}
9: %TCIDATA{Version=5.50.0.2953}
10: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=revtex4.cst}
11: %TCIDATA{Created=Sunday, June 18, 2006 06:21:38}
12: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Wednesday, September 20, 2006 18:26:20}
13: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
14: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="SaveForMode" CONTENT="1">}
15: %TCIDATA{BibliographyScheme=Manual}
16: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="DocumentShell" CONTENT="Articles\SW\REVTeX 4">}
17: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
18: %BeginMSIPreambleData
19: \providecommand{\U}[1]{\protect\rule{.1in}{.1in}}
20: %EndMSIPreambleData
21: \begin{document}
22: \preprint{cond-mat/0607244}
23: \title{Collapse of the critical state in superconducting niobium}
24: \author{Ruslan Prozorov}
25: \email{prozorov@ameslab.gov}
26: \affiliation{Ames Laboratory and Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Iowa State University,
27: Ames, Iowa 50011}
28: \author{Daniel V. Shantsev}
29: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1048 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway}
30: \affiliation{A. F. Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute, Polytekhnicheskaya 26, St. Petersburg
31: 194021, Russia}
32: \author{Roman G. Mints}
33: \affiliation{School of Physics and Astronomy, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact
34: Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel}
35: \keywords{magneto-optics, avalanches, thermo-magnetic instability, critical state}
36: \pacs{74.25.Ha, 74.25.Qt, 74.25.-q}
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39: Giant abrupt changes in the magnetic flux distribution in niobium foils were
40: studied by using magneto-optical visualization, thermal and magnetic
41: measurements. Uniform flux jumps and sometimes almost total catastrophic
42: collapse of the critical state are reported. Results are discussed in terms of
43: thermomagnetic instability mechanism with different development scenarios.
44:
45: \end{abstract}
46: \date{10 July 2006}
47: \revised{20 September 2006}
48:
49: \maketitle
50:
51:
52: Large jumps in magnetization, temperature, ultrasonic attenuation and
53: resistivity have been observed in many superconducting materials since early
54: $60$s \cite{mints,gurevich,altshuler,claiborne,goodman,levy}. Although no
55: definitive mechanism has been identified, it is believed that such changes are
56: caused by sudden redistribution of Abrikosov vortices triggered and supported
57: by thermomagnetic instabilities
58: \cite{mints,gurevich,altshuler,aranson,biehler,rakhmanov,denisov,shantsev,kuzovlev}%
59: . Direct observations of flux jumps using miniature Hall probes
60: \cite{james,altshuler2,esquinazi,chabanenko} and real-time magneto-optical
61: imaging \cite{leiderer,duran,altshuler,johansen,welling,wijngaarden} have
62: confirmed precipitous propagation of flux into the specimen. Although some
63: evidence of large - scale jumps exists \cite{goodman,james}, direct
64: observations of avalanche - like behavior in films have mostly found dendritic
65: and branched finger-like patterns (on a macroscopic scale of the whole sample)
66: or small jumps (few tens of micrometers) forming feather-shaped flux fronts
67: \cite{altshuler,altshuler2,duran,esquinazi,johansen,welling,wijngaarden}.
68:
69: Dendritic avalanches are expected for thin films with high critical current
70: density \cite{aranson,kuzovlev,denisov}. The problem is that dendritic
71: avalanches are too small to result in the observed jumps of magnetization,
72: $M$. If $\delta M$ is a variation of magnetization during a flux jump, then
73: the dendritic avalanches contribute $\delta M\lesssim0.1M$ \cite{johansen}.
74: However, the observed changes are often much larger \cite{chabanenko,young}
75: (also see Fig. \ref{loops}). They must be associated with more dramatic
76: catastrophic changes of the critical state when a nonuniform (Bean's)
77: distribution of vortices suddenly collapses. In this paper we present direct
78: observations of the catastrophic collapse of the critical state in niobium
79: foils and provide evidence for thermomagnetic origin of this effect.%
80:
81: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{fbFU}{9.1028cm}{6.9523cm}{0pt}{\Qcb{(color online)
82: %Magnetization loops measured in $25$ $\mu$m Nb foil at different temperatures,
83: %(a) $1.8$ K, (b) $3$ K, (c) $4$ K and, for comparison, several M(H)\ curves
84: %measured from $4$ kOe to $-4$ kOe in large Nb single crystal. For (b) and (c)
85: %curves start from remanent magnetization, see text for details.}}{\Qlb{loops}%
86: %}{loops}{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
87: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
88: %width 9.1028cm; height 6.9523cm; depth 0pt; original-width 4.8447in;
89: %original-height 3.6867in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
90: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig1.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
91: %BeginExpansion
92: \begin{figure}
93: [b]
94: \begin{center}
95: \includegraphics[
96: height=6.9523cm,
97: width=9.1028cm
98: ]%
99: {fig1.eps}%
100: \caption{(color online) Magnetization loops measured in $25$ $\mu$m Nb foil at
101: different temperatures, (a) $1.8$ K, (b) $3$ K, (c) $4$ K and, for comparison,
102: several M(H)\ curves measured from $4$ kOe to $-4$ kOe in large Nb single
103: crystal. For (b) and (c) curves start from remanent magnetization, see text
104: for details.}%
105: \label{loops}%
106: \end{center}
107: \end{figure}
108: %EndExpansion
109:
110:
111: Pure Nb ($99.99$\%) strips of various thickness ($5$, $10$ and $25$ $\mu$m)
112: were obtained from \textit{Goodfellow}. Sample widths varied from $0.7$ to $4$
113: mm and the lengths varied from $2$ to $10$ mm. Magnetization loops, $M\left(
114: H\right) $, were measured in a \textit{Quantum Design} MPMS. Resistivity,
115: specific heat and transport critical current were measured in a
116: \textit{Quantum Design} PPMS. We also measured sample temperature variation in
117: quasi-adiabatic conditions and found temperature jumps associated with the
118: flux jumps.%
119:
120: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbFU}{9.1028cm}{3.8441cm}{0pt}{\Qcb{(color online)
121: %Penetration of magnetic field in $10$ $\mu$m thick Nb strip after zero-field
122: %cooling. (a) $160$ (b) $415$ (c) $480$ Oe. Penetration in (b) and (c) was
123: %avalanche-like at fields indicated. (Real-time video online \cite{webmovie}%
124: %).}}{\Qlb{zfc}}{zfc}{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
125: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
126: %width 9.1028cm; height 3.8441cm; depth 0pt; original-width 3.5414in;
127: %original-height 1.478in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
128: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig2.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
129: %BeginExpansion
130: \begin{figure}
131: [tb]
132: \begin{center}
133: \includegraphics[
134: height=3.8441cm,
135: width=9.1028cm
136: ]%
137: {fig2.eps}%
138: \caption{(color online) Penetration of magnetic field in $10$ $\mu$m thick Nb
139: strip after zero-field cooling. (a) $160$ (b) $415$ (c) $480$ Oe. Penetration
140: in (b) and (c) was avalanche-like at fields indicated. (Real-time video online
141: \cite{webmovie}).}%
142: \label{zfc}%
143: \end{center}
144: \end{figure}
145: %EndExpansion
146:
147:
148: Figure \ref{loops} shows $M\left( H\right) $ in a $25$ $\mu$m thick Nb foil
149: at different temperatures, (a) $1.8$ K, (b) $3$ K and (c) $4$ K. At the lowest
150: temperature, Fig. \ref{loops}(a), jumps in $M\left( H\right) $ are observed
151: both upon penetration after cooling in zero-field (ZFC) and upon flux exit. At
152: higher temperatures, jumps were only observed upon reduction of the magnetic
153: field, (b), and no jumps were observed above $4$ K, (c). In Fig.
154: \ref{loops}(b) and (c) curves are shown after the external field was reduced
155: from $5$ kOe to zero and an attempt was made to observe jumps upon increasing
156: the magnetic field of the same orientation. Unlike the case of the opposite
157: field, no jumps in $M\left( H\right) $ were observed. These results hint at
158: thermomagnetic instability mechanism \cite{mints,gurevich}. The comparison of
159: flux jumping instability scenarios in thin foils and bulk samples a large Nb
160: single crystal (5 mm diameter, 1 mm thickness) was measured at several
161: temperatures. Figure \ref{loops} (d) shows $M\left( H\right) $ at $T=1.8$ K
162: for both ascending and descending branches. For other temperatures only
163: descending branches are plotted. Giant magnetization jumps were observed upon
164: decrease of the magnetic field at temperatures up to $5.5$ K. Evidently,
165: variation of magnetization at a jump is much larger in a thick sample.%
166:
167: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{fbFU}{8.6042cm}{9.9881cm}{0pt}{\Qcb{Catastrophic collapse of
168: %the critical state upon entry of negative self-field at $T=3.9$ K. (a) $250$
169: %Oe (b) $200$ Oe (c) $100$ Oe (d) $50$ Oe. (Real-time video online
170: %\cite{webmovie}).}}{\Qlb{down}}{down}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
171: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON";
172: %valid_file "F"; width 8.6042cm; height 9.9881cm; depth 0pt;
173: %original-width 3.5336in; original-height 4.1502in; cropleft "0";
174: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
175: %filename 'fig3.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
176: %BeginExpansion
177: \begin{figure}
178: [b]
179: \begin{center}
180: \includegraphics[
181: height=9.9881cm,
182: width=8.6042cm
183: ]%
184: {fig3.eps}%
185: \caption{Catastrophic collapse of the critical state upon entry of negative
186: self-field at $T=3.9$ K. (a) $250$ Oe (b) $200$ Oe (c) $100$ Oe (d) $50$ Oe.
187: (Real-time video online \cite{webmovie}).}%
188: \label{down}%
189: \end{center}
190: \end{figure}
191: %EndExpansion
192:
193:
194: Visualization of the magnetic induction, $B\left( r\right) $, on the sample
195: surface was performed in a flow-type $^{4}$He cryostat with the sample in
196: vacuum attached to a copper heat exchanger (i.e., cooling conditions are
197: different from measurements in \textit{QD} MPMS, Fig.\ref{loops}).
198: Bismuth-doped iron-garnet heterostructure film with in-plane magnetization was
199: used as a magneto-optical indicator \cite{polyanskii,joss}. In all images,
200: intensity is proportional to the magnitude of $B\left( r\right) $. Moreover,
201: due to the dispersion of the Faraday rotation for different wavelengths, up
202: and down directions of the magnetic induction can be distinguished. In our
203: case, green corresponds to flux out of page and yellow corresponds to the
204: opposite orientation (antiflux). This information is useful for flux-antiflux
205: annihilation experiments described below.
206:
207: In magneto-optical experiments, sudden collapses of magnetization were
208: observed only below $T\simeq4.5$ K for all samples. Figure \ref{zfc} shows
209: penetration of the flux into a $10$ $\mu$m Nb strip at increasing magnetic
210: fields, (a) $160$ Oe (b) $415$ Oe and (c) $480$ Oe. The large-scale abrupt
211: jumps in Fig. \ref{zfc} (b) and (c) occurred right before fields at which
212: images were acquired (about $405$ Oe and $470$ Oe, respectively). In our case
213: of 30 Hz data acquisition rate, the jumps seem instantaneous. Real-time
214: dynamics can be viewed online \cite{webmovie}.%
215:
216: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{fbFU}{8.6042cm}{7.1061cm}{0pt}{\Qcb{(color online) Profiles of
217: %the magnetic flux before and after collapse of the critical state upon entry
218: %of the negative flux generated by self-field. The profiles were measured along
219: %dashed lines in Fig.\ref{down} (c) and (d).}}{\Qlb{collapse}}{collapse}%
220: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
221: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
222: %width 8.6042cm; height 7.1061cm; depth 0pt; original-width 4.2177in;
223: %original-height 3.4783in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
224: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig4.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
225: %BeginExpansion
226: \begin{figure}
227: [b]
228: \begin{center}
229: \includegraphics[
230: height=7.1061cm,
231: width=8.6042cm
232: ]%
233: {fig4.eps}%
234: \caption{(color online) Profiles of the magnetic flux before and after
235: collapse of the critical state upon entry of the negative flux generated by
236: self-field. The profiles were measured along dashed lines in Fig.\ref{down}
237: (c) and (d).}%
238: \label{collapse}%
239: \end{center}
240: \end{figure}
241: %EndExpansion
242:
243:
244: The largest and most dramatic features occur upon decrease of a magnetic field
245: when self-field antiflux induced at the edges due to large demagnetization
246: factor starts entering the sample. The antiflux annihilates with the trapped
247: flux providing additional mechanism to trigger thermal instability. An
248: avalanche in progress is difficult to stop, because the whole sample is in the
249: critical state and an increase of temperature leads to reduction of the local
250: critical current density resulting in further flux redistribution. This
251: results in large uniform avalanches when the whole critical state literally
252: collapses. In Fig. \ref{down} two such collapses are shown, - panels (b)
253: (jumped after (a)), and (d) (jumped after (c)). Some intensity banding in Fig.
254: \ref{down} reflects the structure of the trapped flux in this sample.
255:
256: Flux profiles corresponding to the collapse of the critical state are shown in
257: Fig. \ref{collapse}. The profiles were measured along the dashed lines shown
258: in Fig. \ref{down} (c) and (d). Clearly, at some magnetic field, the slightest
259: variation results in a change of the entire distribution of vortices. The
260: observed giant jumps may span more than half the width of the simple, which,
261: to the best of our knowledge, has never been observed before. Moreover, the
262: collapse washes away both the interior critical state as well as any newly
263: penetrated antiflux at the edges. When the magnetic field of the opposite
264: polarity is applied, antiflux annihilates with the trapped flux similar to the
265: self-field antiflux discussed above. This results in large uniform avalanches
266: as shown in Fig. \ref{antiflux}. In general, the largest avalanches and
267: sometimes total collapse of the critical state occurs at small fields upon
268: entry of an antiflux. We think that this is because critical current density
269: is largest and most strongly field - dependent at low fields.%
270:
271: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbFU}{9.1028cm}{5.4784cm}{0pt}{\Qcb{Entry of the antiflux
272: %(from right to left): (a) $-320$ Oe (b) $-470$ Oe. Note a huge uniform
273: %avalanche. (c) $-740$ Oe. Note secondary penetration on top of the flux
274: %distribution flattened by the avalanche. It indicates that $j_{c}$ returned to
275: %its large "cold" values. (Real-time video online \cite{webmovie}).}%
276: %}{\Qlb{antiflux}}{antiflux}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
277: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON";
278: %valid_file "F"; width 9.1028cm; height 5.4784cm; depth 0pt;
279: %original-width 3.5414in; original-height 2.1205in; cropleft "0";
280: %croptop "1"; cropright "0.9998"; cropbottom "0";
281: %filename 'fig5.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
282: %BeginExpansion
283: \begin{figure}
284: [tb]
285: \begin{center}
286: \includegraphics[
287: trim=0.000000in 0.000000in 0.000708in 0.000000in,
288: height=5.4784cm,
289: width=9.1028cm
290: ]%
291: {fig5.eps}%
292: \caption{Entry of the antiflux (from right to left): (a) $-320$ Oe (b) $-470$
293: Oe. Note a huge uniform avalanche. (c) $-740$ Oe. Note secondary penetration
294: on top of the flux distribution flattened by the avalanche. It indicates that
295: $j_{c}$ returned to its large "cold" values. (Real-time video online
296: \cite{webmovie}).}%
297: \label{antiflux}%
298: \end{center}
299: \end{figure}
300: %EndExpansion
301:
302:
303: Although thermal instability seems to be the most natural scenario, direct
304: evidence for thermal effects is scarce. Temperature jumps were detected in
305: Nb-Zr alloys \cite{claiborne}. MgB$_{2}$ films coated with gold showed
306: suppression of the dendritic avalanches \cite{choi}. We report direct
307: measurements of the temperature variation associated with flux jumps in Nb
308: foils. In this experiment, the sample was suspended by four wires on a thin
309: sapphire stage normally used for specific heat measurements in a
310: \textit{Quantum Design} PPMS. The arrangement allows for direct reading of the
311: sample thermometer in almost adiabatic conditions.%
312:
313: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbFU}{8.6042cm}{7.3741cm}{0pt}{\Qcb{(color online)
314: %Temperature variation upon decrease of magnetic field from $3$ kOe to $-3$ kOe
315: %in a $25$ $\mu$m thick Nb foil. The temperature variation was multiplied by a
316: %factor of $20$ for clear visual appearance.}}{\Qlb{avalanches}}{avalanches}%
317: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
318: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
319: %width 8.6042cm; height 7.3741cm; depth 0pt; original-width 4.1779in;
320: %original-height 3.576in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
321: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig6.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
322: %BeginExpansion
323: \begin{figure}
324: [tb]
325: \begin{center}
326: \includegraphics[
327: height=7.3741cm,
328: width=8.6042cm
329: ]%
330: {fig6.eps}%
331: \caption{(color online) Temperature variation upon decrease of magnetic field
332: from $3$ kOe to $-3$ kOe in a $25$ $\mu$m thick Nb foil. The temperature
333: variation was multiplied by a factor of $20$ for clear visual appearance.}%
334: \label{avalanches}%
335: \end{center}
336: \end{figure}
337: %EndExpansion
338:
339:
340: Figure \ref{avalanches} shows field sweeps (all taken from $3$ kOe to - $3$
341: kOe). Temperature jumps were detected at the same range of temperatures and
342: fields as magnetization measured in the same sample. To emphasize the
343: variation, it was multiplied by a factor of $20$. Indeed, local temperature,
344: $T_{a}$, within the "volume" of the avalanche, $V_{a}\simeq5\times10^{-4}$
345: mm$^{3}$, reaches very large values of order of $T_{c}$ \cite{shantsev}. Then
346: the average temeperature measured by the calorimeter is given by $\delta
347: T=T_{a}V_{a}/V_{t}$, where total volume of the sample, $V_{t}\simeq
348: 5\times10^{-2}$ mm$^{3}$. This gives $\delta T\simeq0.01T_{c}$ K, in agreement
349: with the direct measurements, Fig \ref{avalanches}.
350:
351: In general, there are two channels to dissipate the energy of the critical
352: state -- dynamic and adiabatic \cite{mints,gurevich,aranson}. The dynamical
353: channel corresponds to the energy removal to a coolant and it is characterized
354: by the dimensionless parameter , $\alpha=\rho j_{c}^{2}d/h\left( T_{c}%
355: -T_{0}\right) $ \cite{mints,gurevich,aranson,kuzovlev,denisov}. Here $j_{c}$
356: is the critical current, $h\simeq5$ W/cm$^{2}$K, is the heat transfer
357: coefficient, $\rho\simeq0.5$ $\mu\Omega\cdot$cm is the normal state
358: resistivity, $d$ - thickness and $T_{0}$ - temperature of the coolant. The
359: adiabatic channel corresponds to the energy absorption by the material itself
360: which is accompanied by an increase of the sample temperature. The threshold
361: parameter for thin samples is given as $\beta=4dwj_{c}^{2}/\left[ c^{2}%
362: C_{p}^{v}\left( T_{0}\right) (T_{c}-T_{0})\right] $ \cite{shantsev}, where
363: $w$ is the sample halfwidth. Using the results of direct measurements on our
364: foils, $j_{c}\left( T\right) =1.5\times10^{6}\left( 1-T/T_{c}\right) $
365: A/cm$^{2}$ and $C_{p}\left( T\right) =0.25\left( T/T_{c}\right) ^{3}$
366: J/mol$\cdot$K, we obtain $\alpha\simeq8$ and $\beta\simeq15$. Large values of
367: $\alpha$ and $\beta$ indicate that both channels can take away only
368: insignificant fraction of the Joule heat, which makes flux jumps inevitable,
369: in full agreement with our experiments.
370:
371: A flux jump in a thin sample develops into either dendritic or uniform pattern
372: depending on the ratio of thermal and magnetic diffusivities, $\tau
373: =\kappa/4\pi\rho C$, where $\kappa$ is the thermal conductivity.\cite{denisov}
374: Qualitatively, if $\tau$ is very small, the lateral heat diffusion is slow and
375: flux propagates along narrow channels forming a dendritic pattern. For large
376: $\tau$ the heat diffusion establishes essentially uniform temperature
377: distribution and a flux jump spreads out uniformly in all directions. The
378: threshold value is given (for $\alpha\gg1$) as $\tau_{c}\approx w/8dn\beta$
379: \cite{denisov}, where $n$ is the exponent in the current-voltage law,
380: $E\propto j^{n}$. For $n=30$ and $\kappa=10$~W/Km, we find $\tau\simeq1$,
381: while $\tau_{c}\simeq0.03$ indicating that the flux jumps should develop
382: uniformly -- as we indeed observe experimentally. To quantitatively validate
383: these estimates we considered development of flux jumps by numerically solving
384: the thermal diffusion and Maxwell equations, $C_{p}\ dT/dt=jE-h(T-T_{0})/d$
385: and $dE/dx=-dH/dt$. The sample was assumed to be a thin infinite strip, where
386: all the quantities depend only on the coordinate $x$ across the strip.
387:
388: Measured (symbols, corresponding to Fig. \ref{zfc}) and calculated profiles
389: (solid lines) of the magnetic induction are shown in Fig. \ref{zfcprofiles}.
390: If we omit the Joule term $jE$, the calculations produce the well-known
391: Bean-model profiles \cite{brandt} that perfectly fit the experimental profiles
392: before a jump, see the $300$~Oe curves. If we start from such a Bean profile
393: and, keeping applied field constant, introduce an infinitesimal perturbation
394: in $T$, a flux jump occurs. The curve for $415$ Oe shows the final flux
395: profile after such a jump. Apparently, the agreement with experiment is again
396: very good, which further supports the thermomagnetic mechanism of the observed instability.%
397:
398: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftFU}{9.1028cm}{7.5674cm}{0pt}{\Qcb{(color online) Profiles of
399: %magnetic induction in $2.88$ mm wide and $10$ $\mu$m thick strip upon flux
400: %penetration after ZFC. Two inner profiles correspond to large uniform jumps
401: %shown in Fig. \ref{zfc}.}}{\Qlb{zfcprofiles}}{zfcprofiles}%
402: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
403: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
404: %width 9.1028cm; height 7.5674cm; depth 0pt; original-width 4.19in;
405: %original-height 3.4783in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
406: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'fig7.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
407: %BeginExpansion
408: \begin{figure}
409: [t]
410: \begin{center}
411: \includegraphics[
412: height=7.5674cm,
413: width=9.1028cm
414: ]%
415: {fig7.eps}%
416: \caption{(color online) Profiles of magnetic induction in $2.88$ mm wide and
417: $10$ $\mu$m thick strip upon flux penetration after ZFC. Two inner profiles
418: correspond to large uniform jumps shown in Fig. \ref{zfc}.}%
419: \label{zfcprofiles}%
420: \end{center}
421: \end{figure}
422: %EndExpansion
423:
424:
425: Furthermore, we tried to control the rate of heat conductance by introducing a
426: thin mylar film between the heat exchanger and the sample. Both,
427: feather-shaped protrusions and large uniform avalanches were observed in this
428: case. Moreover, uniform jumps appeared even in ZFC samples where they were
429: absent before. These experiments demonstrate that reducing the heat link to
430: the thermal bath makes the avalanches more likely to happen.
431:
432: In conclusion, we observed large scale giant uniform vortex avalanches and
433: even collapse of the critical state in niobium foils. Direct measurements of
434: temperature variation as well as analysis of the magnetic and thermal energy
435: balance support thermomagnetic instability scenario. Comparable values of the
436: magnetic and thermal diffusivities ($\tau\sim1$) result in spatially uniform
437: giant flux jumps.
438:
439: We thank Alex Gurevich, Igor Aranson and Yuri Galperin for useful discussions
440: and Thomas A. Girard for providing the samples and for discussions. Ames
441: Laboratory is operated for US DOE by the Iowa State University under Contract
442: No. W-7405-Eng-82. R. P. acknowledges support from NSF Grant DMR-05-53285 and
443: from the Alfred P. Sloan Research Foundation.
444:
445: \begin{thebibliography}{99} %
446:
447:
448: \bibitem {mints}R. G. Mints and A. L. Rakhmanov, Rev. Mod. Phys. \textbf{53},
449: 551 (1981).
450:
451: \bibitem {gurevich}A. V. Gurevich, R. G. Mints and A. I. Rahmanov,
452: \textit{"The Physics of Composite Superconductors"}, (Begell House Inc., New
453: York, 1997).
454:
455: \bibitem {altshuler}E. Altshuler and T. H. Johansen, Rev. Mod. Phys.
456: \textbf{76}, 471 (2004).
457:
458: \bibitem {claiborne}L. T. Claiborne and N. G. Einspruch, J. App. Phys.
459: \textbf{37}, 925 (1966).
460:
461: \bibitem {goodman}B. B. Goodman and M. Wertheimer, Phys. Lett. \textbf{18},
462: 236 (1965).
463:
464: \bibitem {levy}M. Levy \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{2}, 2804 (1970).
465:
466: \bibitem {aranson}I. S. Aranson \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{94},
467: 037002 (2005).
468:
469: \bibitem {biehler}B. Biehler \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{72}, 024532 (2005)
470:
471: \bibitem {rakhmanov}A. L. Rakhmanov \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{70},
472: 224502 (2004).
473:
474: \bibitem {shantsev}D. V. Shantsev \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{72},
475: 024541 (2005).
476:
477: \bibitem {kuzovlev}Y. E. Kuzovlev, cond-mat/0607143 (2006).
478:
479: \bibitem {denisov}D. V. Denisov \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{73},
480: 014512 (2006).
481:
482: \bibitem {james}S. S. James \textit{et al.}, Physica C \textbf{332}, 445 (2000).
483:
484: \bibitem {altshuler2}E. Altshuler \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{70},
485: 140505 (2004).
486:
487: \bibitem {esquinazi}P. Esquinazi \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{60},
488: 12454 (1999).
489:
490: \bibitem {chabanenko}V. V. Chabanenko \textit{et al.}, Physica C \textbf{369},
491: 82 (2002).
492:
493: \bibitem {leiderer}P. Leiderer \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{71},
494: 2646 (1993).
495:
496: \bibitem {duran}C. A. Dur\'{a}n \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{52}, 75 (1995).
497:
498: \bibitem {johansen}T. H. Johansen \textit{et al.}, Europhys. Lett.
499: \textbf{59}, 599 (2002).
500:
501: \bibitem {welling}M. S. Welling \textit{et al.}, Physica C \textbf{411}, 11 (2004).
502:
503: \bibitem {wijngaarden}R. J. Wijngaarden \textit{et al.}, Europ. Phys. J. B
504: \textbf{50}, 117 (2006).
505:
506: \bibitem {young}D. P. Young \textit{et al.}, Supercond. Sci. Technol.
507: \textbf{18}, 776 (2005).
508:
509: \bibitem {polyanskii}A. A. Polyanskii, D. M. Feldmann and D. C. Larbalestier,
510: in \textit{\textquotedblleft The Handbook on Superconducting Materials"}, D.
511: Cardwell and D. Ginley, editors, UK, pp. 1551 (2003).
512:
513: \bibitem {joss}C. Jooss \textit{et al.}, Rep.Prog. Phys. \textbf{65}, 651-788 (2002).
514:
515: \bibitem {webmovie}http://cmp.ameslab.gov/supermaglab/video/Nb.html
516:
517: \bibitem {brandt}E. H. Brandt and M. Indenbom, Phys. Rev. B \textbf{48}, 12893 (1993).
518:
519: \bibitem {choi}Eun-Mi Choi \textit{et al.}, Appl. Phys. Lett. \textbf{87},
520: 152501 (2005).
521: \end{thebibliography}
522:
523:
524: \end{document}