1: %% LyX 1.4.2 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
2: %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
3: \documentclass[letterpaper,english,prl,twocolumn]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
5: \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
6: \usepackage{subfigure}
7: \usepackage{graphicx}
8:
9: \makeatletter
10:
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
12: %% Bold symbol macro for standard LaTeX users
13: \providecommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
14:
15:
16: \usepackage{babel}
17: \makeatother
18: \begin{document}
19:
20: \preprint{This line only printed with preprint option}
21:
22:
23: \title{Prediction of Superconductivity at $\approx30$ K in Compressed Body-Centered
24: Cubic Yttrium}
25:
26:
27: \author{Prabhakar P. Singh}
28:
29:
30: \email{ppsingh@phy.iitb.ac.in}
31:
32:
33: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Mumbai-
34: 400076, India }
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37: Using \emph{ab initio} methods, we have studied the electron-phonon
38: interaction in compressed, body-centered cubic (bcc) yttrium, which
39: is predicted to be stable at $280$ GPa {[}Melsen \emph{et al}, Phys.
40: Rev. B \textbf{48}, 15574 (1993)]. We find that compressed, bcc yttrium
41: has a large electron-phonon coupling with $\lambda=1.8$, leading
42: to a superconducting transition temperature $T_{c}\approx30$ K or
43: above. Our results indicate that the large electron-phonon coupling
44: is due to the lattice hardening.
45: \end{abstract}
46: \maketitle
47: Recent experiments on pressure-induced increase in superconducting
48: transition temperature $T_{c}$ of yttrium \cite{hamlin} seem to
49: suggest an almost continuous increase in $T_{c}$ with pressure. With
50: increase in pressure from ambient to $115$ GPa, the structural changes
51: \cite{gro_dhcp,vohra} in yttrium from hcp$\rightarrow$Sm-type$\rightarrow$dhcp$\rightarrow$trigonal
52: are accompanied by increase in $T_{c}$ from $6$ mK \cite{probst}
53: to $20$ K \cite{hamlin}. In contrast, $T_{c}$ increases with pressure
54: only in the fcc phase of lithium as it changes from bcc$\rightarrow$fcc$\rightarrow$hR1$\rightarrow$cI16
55: with pressure going up to $70$ GPa \cite{hanfland}. Thus, the pressure-induced
56: changes in $T_{c}$ seem to be intimately connected with the structural
57: phase transitions in these metals \cite{asch}.
58:
59: It has been shown theoretically that yttrium would stabilize in a
60: bcc phase above $280$ GPa \cite{melsen}. Taking a cue from the experiments
61: on yttrium \cite{hamlin}, it is not surprising to expect bcc yttrium
62: to superconduct well above $20$ K at pressures above $280$ GPa.
63: However, it is also possible that in this pressure range yttrium may
64: start to behave like lithium \cite{shimuzu,stru,hanfland,profeta,deepa}.
65:
66: To further investigate the changes in the superconducting properties
67: of bcc yttrium, we have used density-functional-based methods to calculate
68: its electronic structure, lattice-dynamical response and the electron-phonon
69: interaction. Subsequently, we have solved the isotropic Eliashberg
70: gap equation to obtain the superconducting transition temperature
71: $T_{c}$.
72:
73: Based on our calculations, we find that compressed, bcc yttrium has
74: a large electron-phonon coupling with $\lambda=1.8$, leading to a
75: superconducting transition temperature $T_{c}\approx36$ K for $\mu^{*}=0.25$.
76: Such a large coupling is a direct consequence of lattice hardening
77: and its subsequent coupling to Fermi electrons. We also find the electrons
78: at Fermi energy to have predominantly $t_{2g}$ symmetry. Before we
79: describe our results, we briefly outline the computational details
80: of our calculations. Further details can be found in our previous
81: work \cite{pps_y1} as well as the references therein. The notations
82: used here are that of our previous work \cite{pps_y1}.
83:
84: We have calculated the electronic structure, the phonon density of
85: states, $F(\omega)$, and the Eliashberg function, $\alpha^{2}F(\omega)$
86: of bcc yttrium using full-potential, linear muffin-tin orbital (LMTO)
87: method \cite{savrasov1,savrasov2}. Subsequently, we have numerically
88: solved the isotropic Eliashberg gap equation \cite{allen1,allen2,private1}
89: for a range of $\mu^{*}$ to obtain the corresponding $T_{c}.$
90:
91: The lattice constant $a=5.15$ \emph{a.u.} used in our calculations
92: for bcc yttrium approximately corresponds to a compressed volume equal
93: to $0.31v_{0}$, where $v_{0}$ is the experimentally determined equilibrium
94: volume of hcp yttrium \cite{gro_dhcp,vohra,pps_y1}.
95:
96: The charge self-consistent, full-potential, LMTO calculations for
97: bcc yttrium was carried out with $2\kappa-$energy panel, 897 $\mathbf{k}$-points
98: in the irreducible wedge of the Brillouin zone, and the muffin-tin
99: radius for yttrium was taken to be 2.22 atomic units. The 4\emph{s}
100: state of yttrium was treated as a semicore state, while the 4\emph{p}
101: state was treated as a valence state. The basis set used consisted
102: of \emph{s}, \emph{p}, and \emph{d} orbitals at the yttrium site,
103: and the potential and the wave function were expanded up to $l_{max}=6$.
104:
105: The Fermi surface, phonon density of states, and the Eliashberg function
106: of bcc yttrium were calculated using the linear response code based
107: on the full-potential, LMTO method. The Fermi surface was constructed
108: using XCrySDen program \cite{xcrys} with eigenvalues calculated on
109: a $48\times48\times48$ grid in the reciprocal space. The dynamical
110: matrices and the electron-phonon matrix elements were calculated on
111: a $8\times8\times8$ grid resulting in $29$ irreducible $\mathbf{q}$-points.
112: The Brillouin zone integrations during linear response calculations
113: were carried out using a $16\times16\times16$ grid of $\mathbf{k}$-points.
114: The Fermi surface sampling for the evaluation of the electron-phonon
115: matrix elements was done using a $48\times48\times48$ grid. Another
116: set of calculations of self-consistent charge density, $F(\omega)$
117: and $\alpha^{2}F(\omega)$ was carried out at a lattice constant $a=5.1987$
118: a.u. using a $6\times6\times6$ grid with $16$ irreducible $\mathbf{q}$-points.
119: In this case, a $12\times12\times12$ grid of $\mathbf{k}$-points
120: was used for linear-response calculations, in conjunction with a $36\times36\times36$
121: grid for Fermi surface sampling. The muffin-tin radius for yttrium
122: was taken to be 2.251 atomic units. For visualizing the charge density
123: within a $5$ mRy energy window to the Fermi energy we used the atomic-sphere-approximation
124: variant of the LMTO code \cite{tblmto}.
125:
126: %
127: \begin{figure}
128: \begin{centering}\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.3]{fig1}}\par\end{centering}
129:
130:
131: \caption{The \emph{s}, \emph{p}, \emph{d} and the total densities of states
132: of bcc (solid line) and hcp (dashed line) yttrium. The vertical dashed
133: line indicates the Fermi energy. }
134: \end{figure}
135:
136:
137: In Fig. 1, we show the total and the \emph{l}-resolved densities
138: of states (DOS) of bcc yttrium. For comparison, we have also included
139: the DOS for the hcp yttrium \cite{pps_y1}. From Fig. 1, we see that
140: the pressure-induced pushing out of \emph{s}-electrons is followed
141: by creation of new \emph{d}-states between $-0.55$ Ry and $-0.25$
142: Ry to accommodate the \emph{s}-electrons. The flattening of the \emph{d}-band
143: reduces the DOS at the Fermi energy to $10.03$ st/Ry from its hcp
144: value of $25.89$ st/Ry, with most of the contributions coming from
145: the \emph{d}-states.
146:
147: %
148: \begin{figure}
149: \begin{centering}\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.3]{fig2}\par\end{centering}
150:
151:
152: \caption{The symmetry-resolved \emph{d} densities of states in bcc (top panel)
153: and hcp (bottom panel) yttrium. The densities of states in the top
154: panel correspond to $t_{2g}$ ($xy$, y$z$ and $zx$; solid line)
155: and $e_{g}$ ($x^{2}-y^{2}$and $3z^{2}-1$; dashed line) symmetries,
156: while in the bottom panel they correspond to $yz$ ($zx$; solid line),
157: $xy$ ($x^{2}-y^{2}$; dashed line) and $3z^{2}-1$ (dotted line)
158: symmetries. The vertical dashed line indicates the Fermi energy. }
159: \end{figure}
160:
161:
162: It is interesting to consider the symmetry-resolved \emph{d}-DOS,
163: as shown in Fig. 2. Some of the differences in the DOS between the
164: ambient pressure hcp phase and the high-pressure bcc phase arise due
165: to change in symmetry from hexagonal to cubic. In hcp phase, the three
166: independent \emph{d}-DOS corresponding to $yz$ ($zx$), $xy$ ($x^{2}-y^{2}$)
167: and $3z^{2}-1$ symmetries have similar bandwidths but some differences
168: in the DOS as a function of energy. However, in bcc phase the bottom
169: of the doubly degenerate $e_{g}$ ($x^{2}-y^{2}$ and $3z^{2}-1$)
170: symmetry DOS is almost $0.2$ Ry below the bottom of the triply degenerate
171: $t_{2g}$ ($xy$, y$z$ and $zx$) symmetry DOS, indicating transfer
172: of pushed-out \emph{s}-electrons to $e_{g}$ symmetry orbitals. A
173: symmetry-resolved breakup of DOS at the Fermi energy is $0.40$, $1.14$,
174: $5.87$ and $2.62$ st/Ry for $s$, $p$, $t_{2g}$ and $e_{g}$ symmetries,
175: respectively.
176:
177: %
178: \begin{figure}
179: \begin{centering}\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.3,angle=270]{fig3.epsi}\par\end{centering}
180:
181: \begin{centering}\par\end{centering}
182:
183:
184: \caption{The band-structure of bcc yttrium (solid line) along high symmetry
185: directions in the corresponding Brillouin zone. The horizontal line,
186: passing through the energy zero, indicates the Fermi energy. }
187: \end{figure}
188:
189:
190: As a prelude to understanding the Fermi surface topology and the nature
191: of electrons contributing to the electron-phonon interaction, we show
192: in Fig. 3, the calculated band-structure of bcc yttrium along high
193: symmetry directions in the corresponding Brillouin zone. The band
194: corresponding to 4\emph{p} state is much lower in energy, and hence
195: it is not shown in the figure. Based on Fig. 3 and an analysis of
196: the eigenvectors (not shown in the figure), the so-called fat bands,
197: we find that the bands crossing the Fermi energy along $\Gamma$-N,
198: N$-$P and H$-$P symmetry directions have substantial $t_{2g}$ symmetry
199: states, indicating an important role for these electrons as far as
200: the electron-phonon interaction was concerned.
201:
202:
203:
204: Since Fermi surface plays an important role in understanding many
205: of the superconducting properties of materials, we show the calculated
206: Fermi surface of bcc yttrium in Fig. 4. The Fermi surface due to band
207: number 1 surrounds $\Gamma$ point and it has a bucket-like structure
208: around P symmetry point in the reciprocal space. The second band has
209: an umbrella-like structure with four-fold symmetry around N point,
210: in addition to having surfaces around $\Gamma$ and P points. It turns
211: out that some of the flat portions in all these surfaces lead to Fermi
212: surface nesting especially along N$-$P and $\Gamma$$-$P symmetry
213: directions, the indications of which can be seen in Figs. 4 (c) and
214: (d), showing the Fermi surface cut in a plane parallel to (110) plane.
215: A more detailed analysis is needed to clearly identify all the nesting
216: vectors.
217:
218: %
219: \begin{figure}
220: \begin{centering}\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.22]{fig4a}}
221: ~~~\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[scale=0.25]{fig4b}}\par\end{centering}
222:
223: ~
224:
225: \begin{centering}\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig4c}}~~~\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{fig4d}}\par\end{centering}
226:
227:
228: \caption{The Fermi surface of bcc yttrium in reciprocal space unit cell corresponding
229: to (a) band number 1, and (b) band number 2. The Fermi surface cut
230: on a plane parallel to (110) plane for (c) band number 1, and (d)
231: band number 2. The center of the cube corresponds to the $\Gamma$
232: point.}
233: \end{figure}
234:
235:
236:
237:
238: In Fig. 5 we show the charge density within a 5 mRy energy window
239: around the Fermi energy in bcc yttrium, calculated using the tight-binding-LMTO
240: method as mentioned earlier \cite{tblmto}. The $e_{g}$ symmetry
241: electrons seem to be localized around the yttrium sites while $t_{2g}$
242: electrons are more spread out and hybridized with the nearby yttrium
243: atoms. Having described the electronic structure of bcc yttrium, we
244: turn to its lattice-dynamical response and how the phonons couple
245: to electrons close to Fermi energy.
246:
247: Our calculated phonon density of states $F(\omega)$ and the Eliashberg
248: function $\alpha^{2}F(\omega)$ of bcc yttrium are shown in Fig. 6,
249: where we also show the corresponding values for hcp yttrium taken
250: from our earlier work \cite{pps_y1}. In the insets of Fig. 6, we
251: show the variations of $\omega$ and $\lambda_{\mathbf{q}\nu}$ of
252: bcc yttrium along $\Gamma$-N direction. A comparison of $F(\omega)$
253: of bcc yttrium with that of hcp yttrium clearly shows the hardening
254: of the bcc lattice, which has become almost three times as hard. Some
255: of the significant additions to $F(\omega)$ of bcc yttrium take place
256: around the peak at $59$ meV, the peak itself arising out of the displacement
257: of yttrium atoms with components in all the three directions. We also
258: find that the phonon mode (with displacement having components along
259: $+y$ and $-z$ directions) in bcc yttrium along $\Gamma$-N direction
260: softens to 9 meV at $\mathbf{q}=(0.0,0.375,0.375)$ in units of $2\pi/a$,
261: and it has a value of 12.6 meV at the N symmetry point. Phonon softening
262: in fcc yttrium is discussed by Yin \emph{et al}. \cite{yin}.
263:
264: %
265: \begin{figure}
266: \begin{centering}\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.43]{fig5a}}
267: ~~~\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.43]{fig5b}}\par\end{centering}
268:
269: ~
270:
271: \begin{centering}\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.25,angle=-90]{fig5c.epsi}}~~~\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.25,angle=-90]{fig5d.epsi}}\par\end{centering}
272:
273:
274: \caption{The isosurfaces and contours of charge density within a 5 mRy energy
275: window around the Fermi energy in bcc yttrium. The values of the isosurfaces
276: are (a) 3.5 and (b) 4.5 in units of $10^{-2}[e/a.u.^{3}]$, which
277: is also the unit used in (c) and (d). }
278: \end{figure}
279:
280:
281: The pressure-induced increase in $\alpha^{2}F(\omega)$ in yttrium,
282: accompanied by structural phase transformations, seems to arise from
283: the enhancement of contributions from existing modes and coupling
284: strongly to the newly created modes. For example, the peaks around
285: $23$ and $27$ meV are created in the dhcp phase and they become
286: much stronger in the bcc phase, while the peak at $59$ meV is created
287: in the bcc phase. As a result, the average electron-phonon coupling
288: constant $\lambda$ increases from $0.46$ in hcp yttrium to $1.8$
289: in bcc yttrium.
290:
291: Somewhat surprisingly, we find that the largest contribution of $\lambda_{\mathbf{q}\nu}\approx5$
292: to $\lambda_{\mathbf{q}}=5.9$ comes from the phonon mode along $\Gamma$-N
293: direction with $\mathbf{q}$ as mentioned above. At N symmetry point,
294: the same mode contributes $\lambda_{\mathbf{q}\nu}\approx2.9$ to
295: $\lambda_{\mathbf{q}}=5.2$. Smaller contributions with $\lambda_{\mathbf{q}\nu}>1$
296: also come from $\mathbf{q}$-points lying close to $\Gamma$$-$P
297: direction and to-wards H point. The fact that the smaller regions
298: in reciprocal space make substantial contributions to the electron-phonon
299: coupling, a precise determination of $\lambda$ using a uniform $\mathbf{q}$-grid
300: becomes computationally difficult. Since most of these contributions
301: come from the low energy phonons, it is not expected to have a significant
302: effect on the determination of $T_{c}$. To illustrate the point,
303: we also show in Fig. 6, the $F(\omega)$ and $\alpha^{2}F(\omega)$
304: of bcc yttrium calculated at the lattice constant $a=5.1987$ a.u.
305: as described earlier. Not surprisingly, the difference in $\lambda$,
306: resulting from the two sets of calculations, is more pronounced in
307: $15$-$25$ meV region.
308:
309: %
310: \begin{figure}
311: \begin{centering}\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.3]{fig6}\par\end{centering}
312:
313:
314: \caption{The phonon density of states $F(\omega)$ (top panel) and the Eliashberg
315: function $\alpha^{2}F(\omega)$ (bottom panel) of bcc (solid line)
316: and hcp (dashed line) yttrium. The dotted line in the two panels show
317: $F(\omega)$ and $\alpha^{2}F(\omega)$ of bcc yttrium at $a=5.1987$
318: a.u., respectively. The two insets show $\omega$ and $\lambda_{q\nu}$(for
319: the lowest mode) along $\Gamma$-N direction. In the top panel, the
320: phonon density of states of hcp yttrium has been reduced by a factor
321: of 4 for clarity. }
322: \end{figure}
323:
324:
325: %
326: \begin{figure}
327: \begin{centering}\includegraphics[clip,scale=0.3]{fig7}\par\end{centering}
328:
329:
330: \caption{The calculated $T_{c}$ (solid circles) as a function of $\mu^{*}$
331: (left panel) and $v/v_{0}$ (right panel). Experimentally observed
332: $T_{c}$ (open squares), taken from Ref. \cite{hamlin}, are also
333: shown in the right panel. The calculated $T_{c}$ for hcp and dhcp
334: phases of yttrium are taken from Ref. \cite{pps_y1}.}
335: \end{figure}
336:
337:
338: The most important result of the present work is obtained by solving
339: numerically the isotropic gap equation \cite{allen2,private1} using
340: the calculated Eliashberg function $\alpha^{2}F(\omega)$. The results
341: of such a calculation for bcc yttrium as a function of $\mu^{*}$
342: is shown in Fig. 7. We find that for $\mu^{*}$ ranging from $0.1$
343: to $0.25$, the $T_{c}$ values range from $47.7$ to $36.8$ K. A
344: comparison of our calculated $T_{c}$, including the ones described
345: in Ref. \cite{pps_y1}, with experiment is shown in Fig. 7. Thus,
346: the present work clearly shows the possibility of a $T_{c}$ of $30$
347: K or above for compressed, bcc yttrium.
348:
349: In conclusion, we have shown that compressed, bcc yttrium has a large
350: electron-phonon coupling with $\lambda=1.8$, leading to a superconducting
351: transition temperature $T_{c}\approx30$ K or above. We have also
352: shown that such a large coupling is a direct consequence of lattice
353: hardening and its subsequent coupling to Fermi electrons.
354:
355:
356:
357:
358:
359:
360: \begin{thebibliography}{20}
361: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
362: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
363: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
364: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
365: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
366: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
367: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
368: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
369: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
370: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
371: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
372: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
373:
374: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hamlin et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{Hamlin, Tissen, and
375: Schilling}}]{hamlin}
376: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~J.} \bibnamefont{Hamlin}},
377: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~G.} \bibnamefont{Tissen}},
378: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~S.}
379: \bibnamefont{Schilling}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B}
380: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{73}}, \bibinfo{pages}{094522}
381: (\bibinfo{year}{2006}).
382:
383: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Grosshans and Holzapfel}(1992)}]{gro_dhcp}
384: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~A.} \bibnamefont{Grosshans}}
385: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~B.}
386: \bibnamefont{Holzapfel}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B.}
387: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{45}}, \bibinfo{pages}{5171} (\bibinfo{year}{1992}).
388:
389: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Vohra et~al.}(1981)\citenamefont{Vohra, Olijink,
390: Grosshans, and Holzapfel}}]{vohra}
391: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.~K.} \bibnamefont{Vohra}},
392: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Olijink}},
393: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Grosshans}},
394: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~P.}
395: \bibnamefont{Holzapfel}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
396: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{47}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1065} (\bibinfo{year}{1981}).
397:
398: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Probst and Wittig}(1978)}]{probst}
399: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Probst}} \bibnamefont{and}
400: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Wittig}}, in
401: \emph{\bibinfo{booktitle}{Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare
402: Earths}}, edited by
403: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{K.~A.~Gschneidner}}
404: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Eyring}}
405: (\bibinfo{publisher}{North-Holland}, \bibinfo{address}{Amsterdam},
406: \bibinfo{year}{1978}), p. \bibinfo{pages}{749}.
407:
408: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Hanfland et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Hanfland, Syassen,
409: Christensen, and Novikov}}]{hanfland}
410: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Hanfland}},
411: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Syassen}},
412: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.~E.} \bibnamefont{Christensen}},
413: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~L.}
414: \bibnamefont{Novikov}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Nature (London)}
415: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{408}}, \bibinfo{pages}{174} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
416:
417: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ashcroft}(2002)}]{asch}
418: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.~W.} \bibnamefont{Ashcroft}},
419: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature (London)} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{419}},
420: \bibinfo{pages}{569} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
421:
422: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Melsen et~al.}(1993)\citenamefont{Melsen, Wills,
423: Johansson, and Eriksson}}]{melsen}
424: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Melsen}},
425: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~M.} \bibnamefont{Wills}},
426: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Johansson}},
427: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{O.}~\bibnamefont{Eriksson}},
428: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{48}},
429: \bibinfo{pages}{15574} (\bibinfo{year}{1993}).
430:
431: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Shimizu et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Shimizu, Kimura,
432: Takao, and Amaya}}]{shimuzu}
433: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Shimizu}},
434: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Kimura}},
435: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Takao}}, \bibnamefont{and}
436: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Amaya}},
437: \bibinfo{journal}{Nature} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{419}},
438: \bibinfo{pages}{597} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
439:
440: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Struzhkin et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Struzhkin,
441: Eremets, Gan, Mao, and Hemely}}]{stru}
442: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~V.} \bibnamefont{Struzhkin}},
443: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~I.} \bibnamefont{Eremets}},
444: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Gan}},
445: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.-K.} \bibnamefont{Mao}}, \bibnamefont{and}
446: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~J.} \bibnamefont{Hemely}},
447: \bibinfo{journal}{Science} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{298}},
448: \bibinfo{pages}{1213} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
449:
450: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Profeta et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{Profeta, Franchini,
451: Lathiotakis, Floris, Sanna, Marques, Luders, Massidda, Gross, and
452: Continenza}}]{profeta}
453: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Profeta}},
454: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Franchini}},
455: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.~N.} \bibnamefont{Lathiotakis}},
456: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Floris}},
457: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Sanna}},
458: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~A.~L.} \bibnamefont{Marques}},
459: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Luders}},
460: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Massidda}},
461: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~K.~U.} \bibnamefont{Gross}},
462: \bibnamefont{and}
463: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Continenza}},
464: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{96}},
465: \bibinfo{pages}{047004} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}).
466:
467: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kasinathan et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{Kasinathan,
468: Kunes, Lazicki, Rosner, Yoo, Scalettar, and Pickett}}]{deepa}
469: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Kasinathan}},
470: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Kunes}},
471: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Lazicki}},
472: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Rosner}},
473: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~S.} \bibnamefont{Yoo}},
474: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~T.} \bibnamefont{Scalettar}},
475: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~E.}
476: \bibnamefont{Pickett}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
477: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{96}}, \bibinfo{pages}{047004}
478: (\bibinfo{year}{2006}).
479:
480: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Singh}()}]{pps_y1}
481: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~P.} \bibnamefont{Singh}},
482: \eprint{cond-mat/0607176}.
483:
484: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Savrasov}(1996)}]{savrasov1}
485: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~Y.} \bibnamefont{Savrasov}},
486: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{54}},
487: \bibinfo{pages}{16470} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
488:
489: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Savrasov and Savrasov}(1996)}]{savrasov2}
490: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~Y.} \bibnamefont{Savrasov}} \bibnamefont{and}
491: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~Y.} \bibnamefont{Savrasov}},
492: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{54}},
493: \bibinfo{pages}{16487} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
494:
495: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Allen and Dynes}(1975)}]{allen1}
496: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~B.} \bibnamefont{Allen}} \bibnamefont{and}
497: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~C.} \bibnamefont{Dynes}},
498: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{12}},
499: \bibinfo{pages}{905} (\bibinfo{year}{1975}).
500:
501: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Allen and Mitrovic}(1982)}]{allen2}
502: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Allen}} \bibnamefont{and}
503: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.}~\bibnamefont{Mitrovic}}, in
504: \emph{\bibinfo{booktitle}{Advances in Solid State Physics}}, edited by
505: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Ehrenreich}},
506: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Seitz}}, \bibnamefont{and}
507: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Turnbull}}
508: (\bibinfo{publisher}{Academic Press}, \bibinfo{address}{New York},
509: \bibinfo{year}{1982}), \bibinfo{number}{37}, p.~\bibinfo{pages}{1}.
510:
511: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Allen}()}]{private1}
512: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.~B.} \bibnamefont{Allen}}, \eprint{private
513: communication}.
514:
515: \bibitem[{xcr()}]{xcrys}
516: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{xcrysden code:}}, \eprint{http://wwww.xcrysden.org/}.
517:
518: \bibitem[{tbl()}]{tblmto}
519: \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Stuttgart tb-lmto code:}}.
520:
521: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Yin et~al.}()\citenamefont{Yin, Savrasov, and
522: Pickett}}]{yin}
523: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Z.~P.} \bibnamefont{Yin}},
524: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~Y.} \bibnamefont{Savrasov}},
525: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~E.}
526: \bibnamefont{Pickett}}, \eprint{cond-mat/0606538}.
527:
528: \end{thebibliography}
529: \end{document}
530: