1: % This is file JFM2esam.tex

2: % first release v1.0, 20th October 1996

3: %       release v1.01, 29th October 1996

4: %       release v1.1, 25th June 1997

5: %   (based on JFMsampl.tex v1.3 for LaTeX2.09)

6: % Copyright (C) 1996, 1997 Cambridge University Press

7: 

8: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}

9: 

10: \documentclass{jfm}

11: \usepackage{epsfig}

12: 

13: % See if the author has AMS Euler fonts installed: If they have, attempt

14: % to use the 'upmath' package to provide upright math.

15: 

16: \ifCUPmtlplainloaded \else

17:   \checkfont{eurm10}

18:   \iffontfound

19:     \IfFileExists{upmath.sty}

20:       {\typeout{^^JFound AMS Euler Roman fonts on the system,

21:                    using the 'upmath' package.^^J}%

22:        \usepackage{upmath}}

23:       {\typeout{^^JFound AMS Euler Roman fonts on the system, but you

24:                    dont seem to have the}%

25:        \typeout{'upmath' package installed. JFM.cls can take advantage

26:                  of these fonts,^^Jif you use 'upmath' package.^^J}%

27:        \providecommand\upi{\pi}%

28:       }

29:   \else

30:     \providecommand\upi{\pi}%

31:   \fi

32: \fi

33: 

34: % See if the author has AMS symbol fonts installed: If they have, attempt

35: % to use the 'amssymb' package to provide the AMS symbol characters.

36: 

37: \ifCUPmtlplainloaded \else

38:   \checkfont{msam10}

39:   \iffontfound

40:     \IfFileExists{amssymb.sty}

41:       {\typeout{^^JFound AMS Symbol fonts on the system, using the

42:                 'amssymb' package.^^J}%

43:        \usepackage{amssymb}%

44:        \let\le=\leqslant  \let\leq=\leqslant

45:        \let\ge=\geqslant  \let\geq=\geqslant

46:       }{}

47:   \fi

48: \fi

49: 

50: % See if the author has the AMS 'amsbsy' package installed: If they have,

51: % use it to provide better bold math support (with \boldsymbol).

52: 

53: \ifCUPmtlplainloaded \else

54:   \IfFileExists{amsbsy.sty}

55:     {\typeout{^^JFound the 'amsbsy' package on the system, using it.^^J}%

56:      \usepackage{amsbsy}}

57:     {\providecommand\boldsymbol[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $##1$}}}

58: \fi

59: 

60: 

61: %%% Example macros (some are not used in this sample file) %%%

62: 

63: % For units of measure

64: \newcommand\dynpercm{\nobreak\mbox{$\;$dynes\,cm$^{-1}$}}

65: \newcommand\cmpermin{\nobreak\mbox{$\;$cm\,min$^{-1}$}}

66: 

67: % Various bold symbols

68: \providecommand\bnabla{\boldsymbol{\nabla}}

69: \providecommand\bcdot{\boldsymbol{\cdot}}

70: \newcommand\biS{\boldsymbol{S}}

71: \newcommand\etb{\boldsymbol{\eta}}

72: \newcommand\xib{\boldsymbol{\xi}}

73: \newcommand\psib{\boldsymbol{\psi}}

74: \newcommand\Gb{\boldsymbol{\Gamma}}

75: \newcommand\Lamb{\boldsymbol{\Lambda}}

76: \newcommand\bchi{\boldsymbol{\chi}}

77: \newcommand\bPhi{\boldsymbol{\Phi}}

78: % For multiletter symbols

79: \newcommand\Real{\mbox{Re}} % cf plain TeX's \Re and Reynolds number

80: \newcommand\Imag{\mbox{Im}} % cf plain TeX's \Im

81: \newcommand\Rey{\mbox{\textit{Re}}}  % Reynolds number

82: \newcommand\Pran{\mbox{\textit{Pr}}} % Prandtl number, cf TeX's \Pr product

83: \newcommand\Pen{\mbox{\textit{Pe}}}  % Peclet number

84: \newcommand\Ai{\mbox{Ai}}            % Airy function

85: \newcommand\Bi{\mbox{Bi}}            % Airy function

86: 

87: % For sans serif characters:

88: % The following macros are setup in JFM.cls for sans-serif fonts in text

89: % and math.  If you use these macros in your article, the required fonts

90: % will be substitued when you article is typeset by the typesetter.

91: %

92: % \textsfi, \mathsfi   : sans-serif slanted

93: % \textsfb, \mathsfb   : sans-serif bold

94: % \textsfbi, \mathsfbi : sans-serif bold slanted (doesnt exist in CM fonts)

95: %

96: % For san-serif roman use \textsf and \mathsf as normal.

97: %

98: \newcommand\ssC{\mathsf{C}}    % for sans serif C

99: \newcommand\sfsP{\mathsfi{P}}  % for sans serif sloping P

100: \newcommand\slsQ{\mathsfbi{Q}} % for sans serif bold-sloping Q

101: 

102: % Hat position

103: \newcommand\hatp{\skew3\hat{p}}      % p with hat

104: \newcommand\hatR{\skew3\hat{R}}      % R with hat

105: \newcommand\hatRR{\skew3\hat{\hatR}} % R with 2 hats

106: \newcommand\doubletildesigma{\skew2\tilde{\skew2\tilde{\Sigma}}}

107: %       italic Sigma with double tilde

108: 

109: % array strut to make delimiters come out right size both ends

110: \newsavebox{\astrutbox}

111: \sbox{\astrutbox}{\rule[-5pt]{0pt}{20pt}}

112: \newcommand{\astrut}{\usebox{\astrutbox}}

113: 

114: \newcommand\GaPQ{\ensuremath{G_a(P,Q)}}

115: \newcommand\GsPQ{\ensuremath{G_s(P,Q)}}

116: \newcommand\p{\ensuremath{\partial}}

117: \newcommand\tti{\ensuremath{\rightarrow\infty}}

118: \newcommand\kgd{\ensuremath{k\gamma d}}

119: \newcommand\shalf{\ensuremath{{\scriptstyle\frac{1}{2}}}}

120: \newcommand\sh{\ensuremath{^{\shalf}}}

121: \newcommand\smh{\ensuremath{^{-\shalf}}}

122: \newcommand\squart{\ensuremath{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}}

123: \newcommand\thalf{\ensuremath{{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}}

124: \newcommand\Gat{\ensuremath{\widetilde{G_a}}}

125: \newcommand\ttz{\ensuremath{\rightarrow 0}}

126: \newcommand\ndq{\ensuremath{\frac{\mbox{$\partial$}}{\mbox{$\partial$} n_q}}}

127: \newcommand\sumjm{\ensuremath{\sum_{j=1}^{M}}}

128: \newcommand\pvi{\ensuremath{\int_0^{\infty}%

129:   \mskip \ifCUPmtlplainloaded -30mu\else -33mu\fi -\quad}}

130: 

131: \newcommand\etal{\mbox{\textit{et al.}}}

132: \newcommand\etc{etc.\ }

133: \newcommand\eg{e.g.\ }

134: \newcommand\GammaA{\Gamma_{A}}

135: \newcommand\GammaB{\Gamma_{B}}

136: \newcommand{\dint}{\displaystyle\int}

137: \newcommand{\dsum}{\displaystyle\sum}

138: \newcommand{\dfrac}{\displaystyle\frac}

139: \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}

140: \newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}

141: 

142: 

143: \def\a{\alpha}

144: \def\b{{\bf b}}

145: \def\g{\gamma}

146: \def\c{{\bf c}}

147: \def\cd{\!\cdot\!}

148: \def\d{\delta}

149: \def\dd{\mbox{d}}

150: \def\ve{\varepsilon}

151: \def\eps{\epsilon}

152: \def\o{\omega}

153: \def\r{{\bf r}}

154: \def\k{{\bf k}}

155: \def\q{{\bf q}}

156: \def\k{{\bf k}}

157: \def\u{{\bf u}}

158: \def\v{{\bf v}}

159: \def\x{{\bf x}}

160: \def\y{{\bf y}}

161: \def\l{\ell}

162: \def\o{\omega}

163: \def\p{{\bf p}}

164: \def\s{\sigma}

165: \def\vp{\varphi}

166: \def\D{\Delta}

167: \def\G{{\bf G}}

168: \def\H{{\bf H}}

169: \def\K{{\bf K}}

170: \def\L{{\bf L}}

171: \def\Q{{\bf Q}}

172: \def\R{{\bf R}}

173: \def\U{{\bf U}}

174: \def\V{{\bf V}}

175: \def\W{{\bf W}}

176: \newcommand{\gb}[1]{{\bf#1}}  

177: \newcommand{\gbout}[1]{} 

178: 

179: \begin{document}

180: 

181: \title[KH Instability with Periodic Plates]

182: %{Stop Bands in the Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability}

183: {Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities across periodic plates}

184: 

185: %{Bragg Scattering of the Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability}

186: 

187: 

188: \author[Tom Chou]

189: {Tom Chou}

190: 

191: \affiliation{Dept. of Biomathematics and 

192: Dept. of Mathematics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1766 USA}

193: 

194: \maketitle

195: 

196: \begin{abstract}

197: We consider the linear stability of two inviscid fluids, in the

198: presence of gravity, sheared past each other and separated by an

199: flexible plate. Conditions for exponential growth of velocity

200: perturbations are found as functions of the flexural rigidity of the

201: plate and the shear rate. This Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is then

202: analysed in the presence of plates with spatially periodic (with

203: period $a$) flexural rigidity arising from, for example, a periodic

204: material variation.  The eigenvalues of this periodic system are

205: computed using Bloch's Theorem (Floquet Theory) that imposes specific

206: Fourier decompositions of the velocity potential and plate

207: deformations. We derive the nonhermitian matrix whose eigenvalues

208: determine the dispersion relation. Our dispersion relation shows

209: that plate periodicity generally destabilises the flow, compared to a

210: uniform plate with the same mean flexural rigidity. However, enhanced

211: destabilisation and stabilization can occur for disturbances with

212: wavelengths near an even multiple of the plate periodicity. The

213: sensitivity of flows with such wavelengths arises from the

214: nonpropagating, ``Bragg reflected'' modes coupled to the plate

215: periodicity through the boundary condition at the plate.

216: \end{abstract}

217: 

218: 

219: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:INTRO}

220: 

221: When two immiscible fluids are sheared relative to each other, the

222: flow, and the normally flat interface between them, may become

223: unstable.  This classical Kelvin-Helmholtz instability

224: (\cite{CHAND,DRAZIN,WHITHAM}) arises from perturbations of the

225: fluid velocity that grows into a vortex sheet due to local Bernoulli

226: variations in pressure.  The presence of gravity also tunes this

227: instability, depending on the mass density difference and shear rate 

228: between the two fluids.  If the denser fluid is in lower

229: gravitational potential, there is a critical shear rate beyond which

230: small perturbations grow exponentially. This instability first arises

231: in modes of the fluid velocity perturbation that have wavevectors

232: greater than a critical wavevector. All velocity perturbations with

233: sufficiently small wavelength become unstable as long as the shear

234: rate exceeds a critical value. However, very small wavelength

235: perturbations can be stabilised if additional restoring forces from,

236: say, an interfacial surface tension (\cite{WHITHAM}), or a separating

237: elastic plate are included. The Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, and its

238: generalisations, have been thoroughly studied, for example, in the

239: context of knotting in astrophysical jets (\cite{REES}), cloud top

240: entrainment instabilities (\cite{REISS}), magneto-hydrodynamic

241: instabilities (\cite{CHAND} and \cite{FRANK}), and the flutter of panels

242: (\cite{MILES}).

243: 

244: In the context of potential applications involving fluid-structure

245: interactions, we consider the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in the

246: presence of an infinitesimally thin bendable plate separating the two

247: inviscid flows, as shown in Figure \ref{SLAB0}.  We assume the plate

248: is thin and inextensible, such that only bending modes can be excited.

249: Since elastic restoring forces stabilize short wavelength

250: perturbations, instabilities arise only for perturbations that have

251: wavevectors within a certain window of values. Furthermore, we

252: consider an elastic membrane that has spatially periodic properties,

253: such as mass density or bending rigidity, which might arise, for

254: example, in an engineered composite structure. By itself (in the

255: absence of fluid), a periodic plate supports stable bending waves that

256: propagate {\it except} at band gaps, {\it i.e.}  frequencies

257: corresponding to waves that have half-integer wavelengths in one

258: period of the structural variation (\cite{AM} and \cite{LIGHT}). Waves

259: near these wavelengths have vanishing group velocities and do not

260: propagate in an infinite periodic medium due to their multiple

261: ``Bragg'' reflections and deconstructive interference.  Properties of

262: wave propagation through periodic media have been computed in numerous

263: physical settings, including acoustic waves moving through materials

264: with periodic sound speeds (\cite{SIGALAS}), electromagnetic

265: propagation through periodic dielectrics (\cite{LIGHT}), and water

266: wave propagation over periodic structures

267: (\cite{CHEN,CHOU,CHAN,HU,MEI1,PETER,PORTER}).

268: 

269: \begin{figure}

270:     \begin{center} 

271:         \includegraphics[height=2.0in]{slab0.eps}

272:       \end{center} 

273: \caption{Discontinuous shear flow separated by a periodically flexible

274: plate.}

275: \label{SLAB0}

276: \end{figure}

277: 

278: In this paper, we combine the periodic stabilizing membrane with an

279: otherwise unstable shear flow and study the complex dispersion

280: relation. A velocity perturbation with any wavevector, convected by

281: the base laminar flow forms a travelling wave. This travelling wave,

282: when coupled to the intrinsic periodicity of the elastic plate may be

283: Bragg reflected and not able to propagate within the region of

284: periodicity, altering its stability characteristics.

285: %Within this context, we explore the effects of a periodic restoring force on the

286: %Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. 

287: In order to explore this heuristic argument further, we formulate in

288: the next section the linear problem in terms of a vorticity-free

289: velocity perturbation and a small deformation of the separating

290: elastic membrane.  We review, in turn, a uniform plate subject to

291: destabilizing flow, and a free periodic plate that supports stable

292: waves.  The fully coupled problem, a periodic plate in destabilising

293: flow, is then presented in the Results section. We show that the

294: stability properties are affected most when the wavelengths of the

295: most unstable modes are close to the periodicity of the plate

296: flexibility.  Implications and extensions to related flow systems are

297: discussed the Discussion and Conclusions.

298: 

299: \section{Linear Model}\label{sec:LINEAR}

300: 

301: Consider the fluid-structure interaction depicted in Figure

302: \ref{SLAB0}.  Two incompressible fluids flowing uniformly in two

303: different directions, ${\bf U}_{+}$ and ${\bf U}_{-}$, in the $x-y$

304: plane are separated by a negligibly thin elastic plate.  Gravitational

305: acceleration is in the $-{\bf z}$ direction. Since viscosity will be

306: neglected, we will consider only potential flows.  The total velocity

307: in each region ($\pm$) is defined by the uniform flow $\U_{\pm}$ plus

308: a small irrotational perturbation $\v_{\pm} \equiv \nabla \vp_{\pm}$.

309: Upon imposing incompressibility, the upper and lower velocity

310: potentials, $\vp_{\pm}$, satisfy Laplace's equation:

311: 

312: \begin{equation}

313: (\nabla_{\perp}^{2} + \partial_{z}^{2})\vp_{\pm}(\r,z,t) = 0,\quad

314: \nabla_{\perp}^{2} = \partial_{x}^{2}+\partial_{y}^{2}.

315: \label{LAPLACE}

316: \end{equation}

317: 

318: Since $\partial_{z}\varphi\vert_{z=0} \approx v_{z}$ is the vertical

319: velocity of the surface, the kinematic conditions at the

320: plate-separated interface are

321: 

322: \begin{equation}

323: \partial_{t}h(\r,t) + \U_{\pm}\cdot\nabla_{\perp}h(\r,t) - 

324: \lim_{\ve\rightarrow 0}\partial_{z}\vp_{\pm}(\r,\pm\ve,t) = 0,

325: \label{KINEMATIC}

326: \end{equation}

327: 

328: \noindent where $h(\r,t)$ is the normal displacement of the plate.

329: The linearized normal stress balance at the interface,

330: including the normal forces arising from the flexible plate, is

331: 

332: \begin{equation}

333: \left[\rho\dot{\vp}+\rho\U\cd\nabla_{\perp}\vp+\rho gh(\r,t)\right]^{+}_{-}

334: =m(\r)\ddot{h}(\r,t) + \nabla_{\perp}^{2}(D(\r)\nabla_{\perp}^{2})h(\r,t),

335: \label{NSTRESS}

336: \end{equation}

337: 

338: \noindent where $\left[X\right]^{+}_{-} \equiv \lim_{\ve \rightarrow

339: 0} X(z=\ve)-X(z=-\ve)$. In Eq. \ref{NSTRESS}, $m(\r)$ and $D(\r)$ are the

340: mass per unit area and the flexural rigidity of the plate,

341: respectively. Since $h(\r,t)$ and $\vp(\r,z,t)$ are defined

342: only up to a constant, we need only consider the nonzero wavevector

343: decompositions of  the plate displacement and velocity potential,

344: 

345: \begin{equation}

346: \displaystyle h(\r,t) = \sum_{\q\neq 0}\!\int\!h_{\q}(\omega)

347: e^{i\q\cdot\r-i\omega t}{\dd \o \over 2\pi} \quad \mbox{and} \quad

348: \vp_{\pm}(\r,z,t) = \sum_{\q\neq 0}\!\displaystyle

349: \int\!\varphi^{\pm}_{\q}(\omega) e^{i\q\cdot\r-i\omega t

350: \mp\vert\G-\q\vert z}{\dd \o \over 2\pi}.

351: \label{EXPANSIONS}

352: \end{equation}

353: 

354: 

355: %\begin{equation}

356: %\begin{array}{rl}

357: %\displaystyle h(\r,t) & \displaystyle = \sum_{\q}'\displaystyle \int{\dd \o \over 2\pi}

358: %e^{i\q\cdot\r-i\omega t}h_{\q}(\omega) \qquad \mbox{and} \\[13pt]

359: %\displaystyle \vp_{\pm}(\r,z,t) & \displaystyle =  \sum_{\q}'\displaystyle \int{\dd

360: %\o \over 2\pi} \varphi^{\pm}_{\q}(\omega)

361: %e^{i\q\cdot\r-i\omega t}e^{\mp\vert\G-\q\vert z},

362: %\end{array}

363: %\label{EXPANSIONS}

364: %\end{equation}

365: 

366: %\noindent where $\sum_{\q}'$ signifies the sum $\sum_{\q\neq 0}$

367: %that excludes the zero-wavevector component. 

368: 

369: \noindent In Eqs. \ref{EXPANSIONS}, we have also assumed a continuous

370: time-harmonic decomposition.  The representation of $\vp_{\pm}(\r, z,

371: t)$ automatically satisfies Eq. \ref{LAPLACE} and the boundary

372: conditions at $z\rightarrow \pm\infty$.

373: 

374: The periodic plate mass density and rigidity functions that obey

375: $m(\r)= m(\r+\R)$ and $D(\r)=D(\r+\R)$, where $\R=n_{1}a_{1}{\bf

376: e}_{1} + n_{2}a_{2}{\bf e}_{2}\,$ ($n_{1},n_{2}$ integers) is any

377: basis vector describing the periodicity. Here, $a_{1}, a_{2}$ are the

378: periodicities of $m(\r)$ and $D(\r)$ in the ${\bf e}_{1}, {\bf e}_{2}$

379: directions.  The periodic functions $m(\r)$ and $D(\r)$ can thus be

380: decomposed into a Fourier sum over reciprocal lattice vectors $\G$,

381: 

382: 

383: \begin{equation}

384: m(\r)=\sum_{G}m(\G)e^{i\G\cdot\r} \,\quad \mbox{and}\quad\,   

385: D(\r) = \sum_{G}D(\G)e^{i\G\cdot\r}.

386: \label{DECOMP}

387: \end{equation}

388: 

389: 

390: \noindent The reciprocal lattice vectors $\G = n_{1}\G_{1} + n_{2}\G_{2}$

391: are defined by the reciprocal lattice basis vectors

392: 

393: \begin{equation}

394: \G_{1} = {2\pi\over a_{1}} {{\bf e}_{2}\times{\bf z}\over

395: {\bf e}_{1}\cdot({\bf e}_{2}\times {\bf z})} \,\quad\mbox{and}\quad\,

396: \G_{2} = {2\pi\over a_{2}} {{\bf z}\times{\bf e}_{1}\over

397: {\bf e}_{1}\cdot({\bf e}_{2}\times {\bf z})}.

398: \end{equation}

399: 

400: 

401: Finally, we assume a large plate with dimensions $L_{1}\times L_{2}$

402: that fit an integer multiple of the period ($L_{1} = N_{1}a_{1}$ and

403: $L_{2} = N_{2}a_{2}$) and impose periodic boundary

404: conditions on the entire system: $m(\r + N_{i}a_{i}{\bf e}_{i}) =

405: m(\r)$ and $D(\r + N_{i}a_{i}{\bf e}_{i}) = D(\r)$ for $i=1,2$.  Under

406: this construction, the wavevector sum in the decompositions

407: \ref{EXPANSIONS} are taken over $\q = \sum_{n_{i}\neq

408: 0}(n_{i}/N_{i})\G_{i}$. In the $L_{1},L_{2}\rightarrow \infty$ limit,

409: sums over $\q$ become the Cauchy principle value of the corresponding

410: Riemann integral.

411: 

412: 

413: After substitution of Eqs. \ref{EXPANSIONS} into the 

414: kinematic conditions \ref{KINEMATIC}, we find 

415: the relationship

416: 

417: \begin{equation}

418: \varphi^{\pm}_{\q}(\o) = \pm {i(\o - \U_{\pm}\cd\q)\over \vert

419: \q\vert}h_{\q}(\o), \qquad \q\neq 0.

420: \label{PHIH}

421: \end{equation}

422: 

423: \noindent Upon substitution of Eqs. \ref{EXPANSIONS}, \ref{DECOMP},

424: and \ref{PHIH} into Eq. \ref{NSTRESS}, and exploiting the

425: orthogonality of the $e^{i\q\cdot\r}$ basis functions,

426: 

427: \begin{equation}

428: \begin{array}{l}

429: \left[(\rho_{+}+\rho_{-})\o^{2} - 

430: 2\o (\rho_{+}\U_{+} + \rho_{-}\U_{-})\cd\q + 

431: \rho_{+}(\q\cd\U_{+})^{2}+\rho_{-}(\q\cd\U_{-})^{2} + 

432: (\rho_{+}-\rho_{-})g\vert\q\vert\right]h_{\q} \\[13pt]

433: \:\hspace{2cm} = 

434: -\o^{2}\vert\q\vert\sum_{\G'}m(\G')h_{\q-\G'} + 

435: \sum_{\G'}\vert\q\vert^{3}\vert\q-\G'\vert^{2}D(\G')h_{\q-\G'}.

436: \end{array}

437: \label{INTEGRAL}

438: \end{equation}

439: 

440: \noindent Equation \ref{INTEGRAL} shows that each coefficient $h_{\q}$

441: is linked with $N_{1}\times N_{2}$ other coefficients

442: $h_{\q-\G'}$. This problem can be solved numerically by truncating

443: $h_{\q-\G} \approx 0$ for large $\vert\G\vert$ where $m(\G)$ and

444: $D(\G)$ are small.  Alternatively, Eq. \ref{INTEGRAL} can be organized

445: according to the ``reduced zone scheme,'' by defining $\k = \q-\G$,

446: where $\G$ is such that $\k$ is restricted in the first Brillouin zone

447: defined by $\vert\k\cdot{\bf e}_{i}\vert < \vert\G_{i}\cdot{\bf

448: e}_{i}\vert/2$ (\cite{AM}).  In this representation, we need only

449: consider the $N_{1}\times N_{2}$ eigenvalues, each with index $\k$

450: inside the first Brillouin zone. The problem is thus cast into a

451: quadratic eigenvalue problem defined by

452: 

453: \begin{equation}

454: \sum_{\G'}\left[A_{\k}(\G,\G')\omega^{2} + B_{\k}(\G,\G')\omega +

455: C_{\k}(\G,\G')\right]h_{\k-\G'}(\o) = 0,

456: \label{MATRIX2}

457: \end{equation}

458: 

459: 

460: \noindent where 

461: 

462: \begin{equation}

463: \begin{array}{l}

464: \displaystyle A_{\k}(\G,\G') = {\rho_{+}+\rho_{-} \over

465: \vert\k-\G\vert}\d_{\G,\G'} + m(\G'-\G) \\[13pt] \displaystyle

466: B_{\k}(\G,\G') = - 2\left[\rho_{+}{\U_{+}\cd(\k-\G)\over \vert\k-\G\vert} +

467: \rho_{-}{\U_{-}\cd(\k-\G)\over

468: \vert\k-\G\vert}\right]\d_{\G,\G'}\\[13pt] \displaystyle C_{\k}(\G,\G') =

469: \left[\rho_{+}{(\U_{+}\cd(\k-\G))^{2}\over \vert\k-\G\vert}+

470: \rho_{-}{(\U_{-}\cd(\k-\G))^{2}\over

471: \vert\k-\G\vert}+(\rho_{+}-\rho_{-})g\right]\d_{\G,\G'} \\[13pt]

472: \:\displaystyle

473: \hspace{6cm} -\vert\k-\G\vert^{2}\vert\k-\G'\vert^{2}D(\G'-\G).

474: \end{array}

475: \end{equation}

476: 

477: \noindent Equation \ref{MATRIX2} is a matrix equation for

478: $h_{\k-\G}(\o)$ that has solutions for only certain 

479: $\o(\k)$. 

480: %This first result determines the stability of the

481: %coupled, periodic system. Analogous equations can be developed for

482: %related flow stability problems such as flow in a periodically

483: %compliant pipe (a periodic Orr-Sommerfeld problem). In cases where a

484: %nonuniform flow field is present, we expect qualitatively similar

485: %quadratic eigenvalue equations. 

486: The full dispersion relation can be recovered by assigning the

487: appropriate translation $\G$ in the eigenvalues $\o(\k-\G)$ to

488: $\omega(\q)$ for wavevectors $\q$ outside the first Brillouin zone.

489: The system becomes unstable when $\omega(\q)$ acquires an imaginary

490: component.

491: 

492: In anticipation of a length scale $a$ associated with the periodicity

493: in the plate properties, we henceforth nondimensionalise all

494: parameters and eliminate $\rho_{-}, g$ and $a$ according to

495: 

496: 

497: \begin{equation}

498: \begin{array}{l}

499: \displaystyle \r \rightarrow \r/a, \, \, \G \rightarrow a\G,\,\,

500: \k\rightarrow a\k,\,\, \o \rightarrow \sqrt{{a\over g}}\o, \,\, \U_{\pm} \rightarrow {\U_{\pm}\over \sqrt{ag}} \\[13pt]

501: \displaystyle D\rightarrow {D \over a^{4}\rho_{-}g},\,\, m \rightarrow {m\over

502: a\rho_{-}},\,\,\,\mbox{and}\,\,\,  h_{\k}(\G) \rightarrow h_{\k}(\G)/a.

503: \end{array}

504: \end{equation}

505: 

506: %\begin{eqnarray}

507: %\left[\rho_{+}{(\U_{+}\cd(\G-\q)+\o)^{2}\over \vert\G-\q\vert}

508: %+\rho_{-}{(\U_{-}\cd(\G-\q)+\o)^{2}\over \vert\G-\q\vert}

509: %+(\rho_{+}-\rho_{-})g\right]h_{\q}(\G)\hspace{2cm}\:\nonumber \\

510: %\:\hspace{2cm}=

511: %\sum_{\G'}\left[\vert\G-\q\vert^{2}\vert\G'-\q\vert^{2}

512: %D(\G-\G')-m(\G-\G')\o^{2}\right]h_{\q}(\G').

513: %\hspace{1cm}\:

514: %\label{MATRIX}

515: %\end{eqnarray}

516: 

517: 

518: %\noindent which is a matrix equation for $h_{\q}(\G,\o)$ that only has

519: %solutions for certain dispersion relations $\o(q)$. Upon

520: %nondimensionalizing all distances by a fixed length $a$ (which will be

521: %idenstified with the plate periodicity),

522: 

523: 

524: 

525: \subsection{A Uniform Plate in the Presence of Flow}

526: 

527: First consider the standard Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in the

528: presence of a uniform elastic plate, where $m=m_{0}$ and $D(\r) =

529: D_{0}$ are constants.  \cite{MILES01} treated a similar problem of a

530: thin boundary layer over an elastic plate. Since $D(\G) =

531: D_{0}\delta_{\G,0}$ and $m(\G) = m_{0}\delta_{\G,0}$,

532: Eq. \ref{MATRIX2} is diagonal and is satisfied when

533: 

534: \begin{equation}

535: \Gamma(q)\omega_{\pm}(\q) = (\g\U_{+}+\U_{-})\cd\q \pm

536: \sqrt{\Delta(\q)},

537: \label{OMEGA}

538: \end{equation}

539: 

540: \noindent where $\Gamma(q)\equiv \g+1+m_{0}q$, and 

541: the discriminant

542: 

543: \begin{equation}

544: \Delta(\q) \equiv

545: \Gamma(q)(D_{0}q^{5}+(1-\g)q)-\g((\U_{+}-\U_{-})\cd\q)^{2}-m_{0}q

546: (\g(\U_{+}\cd\q)^{2}+(\U_{-}\cd\q)^{2}).

547: \label{DELTA}

548: \end{equation}

549: 

550: \noindent The eigenvalues $\o_{\pm}$ become complex when $\Delta(\q)$

551: becomes negative, leading to exponentially growing perturbations. In

552: the limit where the influence of the plate is negligible ($m_{0},

553: D_{0}\approx 0$) the dispersion relation reduces to that of the

554: standard Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. The inclusion of membrane

555: stiffness ($D_{0}> 0$) tends to stabilise small wavelength modes.  For

556: any given $m_{0}\geq 0$, the pairs of critical $D_{0}$ and $U$

557: (denoted $D_{*}$ and $U_{*}$) that give the onset of instability at a

558: chosen wavevector $q_{*}$ can be expressed explicitly in two flow

559: configurations where $\U_{\pm}$ and the $\q$ corresponding to the most

560: unstable velocity perturbations are all collinear.  When $\U_{\pm}$ are

561: collinear, the onset of instability arises when $\Delta(\q) = 0$ is

562: solved by two critical repeated, real roots, $q_{*}$, in addition to

563: the root at $q=0$ and two complex conjugate roots.  For a static

564: configuration of the lower fluid ($\U_{-}=0$ in the reference frame of

565: the plate), we find

566: 

567: \begin{equation}

568: \begin{array}{rcl}

569: \displaystyle D_{*} &=& \displaystyle {(1+m_{0}q_{*})^2 -

570: \g^{2}(1+2m_{0}q_{*})-\g m_{0}^{2}q_{*}^{2}\over 

571: q_{*}^{4}(3(1+\g+m_{0}^{2}q_{*}^{2})+2(\g+3)m_{0}q_{*})}\\[13pt]

572: \displaystyle U_{*}^{2} &=& \displaystyle

573: {4(1-\g)(1+\g+m_{0}q_{*})^{2} \over 

574: \g q_{*}(3(1+\g+m_{0}^{2}q_{*}^{2})+2(\g+3)m_{0}q_{*})}.

575: \end{array}

576: \label{DUSTAR}

577: \end{equation}

578: 

579: 

580: %\begin{equation}

581: %D_{*}= {27\over 256}{\g^{4}(\Delta\U\cd\hat{\q})^{8}\over

582: %(1-\g^{2})^{3}(\g+1)}

583: %\end{equation}

584: 

585: \begin{figure}[h!]

586:     \begin{center} 

587:         \includegraphics[height=2.2in]{disp.eps}

588:       \end{center} 

589: \caption{(a) The curve relating the critical value of the shear

590: $U_{*}$ to the constant flexural rigidity $D_{0}$, for various values

591: of the uniform plate mass density $m_{0}$. For  velocities

592: greater than $U_{*}$, the flow becomes unstable. For different plate

593: mass densities, the sets of $D_{*}, U_{*}$ that give rise to an

594: initial instability at wavevectors $q_{*}=\pi$ and $q_{*}=2\pi$ are

595: shown by the black arcs spanning the curves. (b) The dispersion

596: relation for a uniform plate just after the onset of instability.}

597: \label{DU}

598: \end{figure}

599: 

600: \noindent Alternatively, for a chosen value of $D_{0}$, the critical

601: $U_{*}$ and the corresponding initially unstable wavevector can be

602: found implicitly.  The critical velocities $U_{*}$, as a function of

603: $D_{0}$ and $m_{0}$ are shown in Fig. \ref{DU}(a).  Note that the

604: critical velocity $U_{*}$ {\it decreases} as the plate mass density

605: $m_{0}$ increases. The limit $m_{0}\rightarrow \infty$ is different

606: from the $\rho_{\pm}\rightarrow 0$ limit treated in the next section.

607: Here, the plate flexibility remains constant as its mass density

608: increases.  Although the magnitude of $\o_{\pm}(q)$ decreases, the

609: discriminant (Eq. \ref{DELTA}) becomes negative at smaller $U_{*}$ due

610: to the increased inertial forces of he plate back on the fluid.

611: 

612: The two branches of the full dispersion relation $\omega_{\pm}(q)$ are

613: plotted in Fig. \ref{DU}(b).  We have chosen parameters ($D_{*}(\pi)$

614: and $U_{*}^{2}$ defined by Eqs. \ref{DUSTAR}) such that the onset of

615: instability arises at $q_{*}\approx \pi$. For $U = 1/\sqrt{2} <

616: U_{*}(q_{*}=\pi) = 0.756320$, $\o_{\pm}(q)$ are real, as shown by the dashed

617: curves.  We also plot (solid curves) the dispersion relation for $U =

618: 0.761577 > U_{*}(q_{*}=\pi) = 0.75632$, whereupon a window of instability

619: opens near $q_{*}=\pi$. The magnitude of the complex parts of

620: $\o_{\pm}(q)$ are indicated by the height of the shaded region.

621: 

622: In the second flow configuration, we assume a vanishing net momentum in the 

623: reference frame of the plate: $\U_{-}=-\gamma \U_{+}$. In this case, we find

624: independent of $m_{0}$,

625: 

626: \begin{equation}

627: D_{*} = {1-\g \over 3q_{*}^{4}}\quad \mbox{and} \quad U_{*}^{2}

628: ={4(1-\g) \over 3\g(\g+1)q_{*}},

629: \label{DUSTAR2}

630: \end{equation}

631: 

632: \noindent and the symmetry $\omega_{+}(q) = -\omega_{-}(q)$.  For

633: $D_{0} \lesssim D_{*}$ and/or $U\gtrsim U_{*}$, as defined by

634: Eq. \ref{DUSTAR} or Eq. \ref{DUSTAR2}, $\omega(q\approx q_{*})$

635: becomes complex and instability arises for a small window of

636: wavevectors near $q_{*}$.

637: 

638: %\begin{figure}

639: %    \begin{center} 

640: %        \includegraphics[height=5in]{disp.eps}

641: %      \end{center} 

642: %\caption{(a) The dispersion relation $\o_{\pm}(q)$ (black and red

643: %curves) for $\g=1/2$, $m=0.2$. Both the stable ($U < U_{*}(\pi) =

644: %0.75632$, dashed curves) and unstable ($U > \U_{*}(\pi) = 0.75632$,

645: %solid curves) are shown. In the unstable case the magnitude of the

646: %complex part of $\o_{\pm}(q)$ is indicated by the vertical hatched

647: %lines.  (b) Dispersion relation of an isolated, but periodic plate.}

648: %\label{DISP}

649: %\end{figure}

650: 

651: 

652: \subsection{Dispersion Relation for a Free Periodic Plate}\label{subsec:FP}

653: 

654: Now consider the limit of an isolated (but periodically structured)

655: plate where the inertia of the bounding fluid is negligible. If the

656: plate were uniform, the dispersion relation in the limit

657: $\rho_{\pm}\rightarrow 0$ is simply $m_{0}\o^{2} = D_{0}q^{4}$. For a

658: periodically structured plate ($m(\G\neq 0)\neq 0, D(\G\neq 0) \neq

659: 0$), the dispersion relation can be found from Eq. \ref{MATRIX2} with

660: the simplified matrices $A(\G-\G') = m(\G-\G'), B(\G-\G')=0$, and

661: $C(\G-\G') = -\vert\k+\G\vert^{2}\vert\k+\G'\vert^{2}D(\G-\G')$.

662: Henceforth, we assume the periodicities in the plate to be sinusoidal

663: in the ${\bf x}$-direction and take the forms

664: 

665: \begin{equation}

666: m(\r) = m_{0} + 2m_{1}\cos 2\pi x; \quad D(\r) = D_{0} + 2D_{1}\cos 2\pi x,

667: \end{equation}

668: 

669: Although the mean mass density and bending rigidity are unchanged from

670: $m_{0}$ and $D_{0}$, respectively, the variations $m_{1}$ and/or

671: $D_{1}$ will change the dispersion relation. Specifically, periodic

672: variations will break the dispersion relation at wavevectors

673: corresponding to waves that cannot propagate through an infinite,

674: periodic medium. At each of these wavevectors (the ``Bragg planes''),

675: the waves (half-integers of which fit into a period) become

676: standing. Corresponding to these nonpropagating waves are gaps in the

677: frequency (band gaps, or stop bands) within which an infinitely

678: periodic material cannot be excited.

679: 

680: \begin{figure}[h!]

681:     \begin{center} 

682:         \includegraphics[height=2.2in]{dispbg.eps}

683:       \end{center} 

684: \caption{(a) The normalized dispersion relation

685: $\sqrt{m_{0}/D_{0}}\,\o_{\pm}(q)$ for $m_{1}=0$, $D_{1}/D_{0} = 0.1$

686: (dashed curve) and $D_{1}/D_{0}=0.25$ (solid curve).  (b) A blow-up of

687: the dispersion relation for $D_{1}=0, m_{1}/m_{0}=0.1$ (dashed curve)

688: and $m_{1}/m_{0}=0.25$ (solid curve).}

689: \label{DISPBG}

690: \end{figure}

691: 

692: Figures \ref{DISPBG}a,b show the dispersion relation of an isolated

693: plate with periodicities in the bending rigidity (a), and mass density

694: (b).  The frequency gaps increase as the contrast $m_{1}$ or $D_{1}$

695: is increased. From consideration of the eigenvectors, the standing

696: modes near the band gaps can be shown to have either nodes or

697: antinodes over the high flexural rigidity (or high mass density)

698: regions, depending on which side of the band gap the wavevector $q$

699: lies. These behaviour generally arise in wave propagation through

700: periodic media.  When the plate is coupled to flow, it will be the

701: near equal-wavelength modes immediately straddling the band gaps, with

702: different frequencies and $\sim 90^{\circ}$ out-of-phase, that will

703: qualitatively affect the stability near the band gaps.

704: 

705: \section{Results for the Coupled Problem}\label{sec:FCP}

706: 

707: We now combine the known results of the previous sections and consider

708: the fully coupled problem where fluid instabilities and Bragg

709: reflection interact. For simplicity, we consider the plate periodicity

710: wavevectors ($\G = 2\pi n/a {\bf x}$) and the uniform flows ${\bf

711: U}_{\pm}=U_{\pm}{\bf x}$ to be aligned. In the full problem, the

712: dispersion relation $\o(q)$ may be both complex (signalling regions of

713: instability) and discontinuous at band gaps where

714: $(\partial\omega/\partial q) = 0$.  The full dispersion relation is

715: found from solving the quadratic eigenvalue problem given by

716: Eq. \ref{MATRIX2}.  This problem can be expressed in linear eigenvalue

717: form,

718: 

719: \begin{equation}

720: ({\bf M}-\omega {\bf I})\cdot\etb = 0,

721: \label{LINEAREIGEN}

722: \end{equation}

723: 

724: \noindent with $\etb = (h_{\k}, \o h_{\k})^{T}$, and 

725: 

726: \begin{equation}

727: {\bf M} = \left(\begin{array}{cc}

728: {\bf 0} & {\bf I} \\[13pt]

729: -{\bf A}^{-1}{\bf C} & -{\bf A}^{-1}{\bf B} \end{array}\right).

730: \label{ACBMATRIX}

731: \end{equation}

732: 

733: The dispersion relation $\o(\k)$ is found from the eigenvalues of the

734: nonhermitian matrix ${\bf M}$. For the parameters explored, we find

735: numerical convergence of the lowest handful of eigenvalues with 40 or

736: fewer modes $\G, \G'$. Therefore, we truncate the system at

737: approximately 60 modes (where ${\bf M}$ is a $120\times 120$

738: matrix). This is more than sufficient to obtain numerical accuracy for

739: the lower eigenvalues at all relevant wavevectors.  The eigenvalues of

740: ${\bf M}$ are sorted from the numerical solutions and replotted in the

741: extended zone scheme where the wavevector $0\leq \vert\q\vert <

742: \infty$.  When unfolding the eigenvalues $\omega(\k)$, we make use of

743: the fact the functions $\omega(0\leq \vert\q\vert < \infty)$ in the

744: normal extended zone scheme come in pairs $\omega_{\pm}(\q)$ and have

745: the symmetry property $\omega_{\pm}(-\vert\q\vert) =

746: -\o_{\mp}(\vert\q\vert)$.  This property, along with the consideration

747: of the corresponding eigenvectors at each wavevector $k$ allows us to

748: reconstruct $\omega_{\pm}(q)$ from $\omega_{\pm}(k)$.

749: 

750: \begin{figure}

751:     \begin{center} 

752:         \includegraphics[height=4.0in]{9b.eps}

753:       \end{center} 

754: \caption{(a-c) The complex dispersion relation for a system just above

755: the instability threshold.  The instability is first triggered at

756: $q_{*} = \pi/2$ (which arises for parameters $\gamma =1/2,

757: m_{0}=0.2, D_{0} \leq D_{*} = 0.0298349$, and $U^{2} \geq U_{*}^{2} =

758: 1.19809$). As $D_{1}$ increases, the instability bubble

759: (Im$\{\o_{\pm}\}$) increases in size as more wavevectors become

760: unstable. (d-f) Dispersion relation for instabilities that first arise

761: at $q_{*}=3.14\lesssim \pi$. As $D_{1}$ is increased, the modes with $q < \pi$ are

762: destabilised, while those with $q>\pi$ are stabilised. (g-i)

763: Increasing $D_{1}$ when the incipient instability starts at

764: $q_{*}=3.25 >\pi$ destabilises modes with $q> \pi$ and stabilises

765: those with $q< \pi$.}

766: \label{FULL}

767: \end{figure}

768: 

769: In Figures \ref{FULL}(a-c) we show the effects of increasing the

770: strength of the periodic rigidity $D_{1}/D_{0}$ for the case

771: $\U_{-}=0$. In Fig. \ref{FULL}(a) we show a system with an incipient

772: instability at $q \approx q_{*} = \pi/2$.  As $D_{1}$ is increased

773: (Figs. \ref{FULL}(b-c)) the bubble of instability grows modestly,

774: while gaps in the dispersion relation also appear. The destabilising

775: effect of rigidities with periodicity $a \gg 2\pi/q_{*}$ can be

776: understood in terms of a slight effective softening of the plate to

777: bending modes with wavelengths greater than $a$\footnote{The effective

778: long wavelength bending rigidity of a plate made from alternating

779: equal strips of two materials with individual rigidities

780: $D_{0}\pm\Delta D$ is $D_{eff} = 2/(1/(D_{0}+\Delta D)+1/(D_{0}-\Delta

781: D)) \approx D_{0} - (\Delta D)^2/D_{0}$}.

782: 

783: Note that the gaps here do not appear at the Brillouin zone edge

784: $q=\pi$ defined by a system's static periodic structure as in the free

785: plate problem (Figs. \ref{DISPBG}) and in most other settings.

786: Rather, they appear symmetrically around the band edge due to a

787: doppler shift arising from the nonvanishing net momentum of the

788: system. Gaps occurring away from the zone boundaries have been shown

789: by \cite{BERMEL} to arise in electromagnetic propagation through

790: deformed cholesteric elastomers.

791: 

792: Now consider an incipient instability that arises at higher

793: wavevectors, near the first band gap at $q=\pi$. Assume for

794: simplicity, the zero net momentum ($\U_{-}=-\gamma \U_{+}$) case where

795: ${\bf B}_{\k}(\G,\G') = 0$ in Eq. \ref{MATRIX2} and

796: $\omega_{\pm}(q)=-\o_{\mp}(q)$. Figures \ref{FULL}(d-f) show the

797: effects of increasing $D_{1}$ when the initial instability starts at

798: $q_{*}=3.14 \lesssim \pi$.  As the plate heterogeneity is increased,

799: modes with wavevector $q < \pi$ are destabilised, while those with

800: $q>\pi$ are stabilised. Conversely, if the incipient instability

801: arises at $q_{*} \gtrsim \pi$, as in Figs. \ref{FULL}(g-i) (where

802: $q_{*}=3.25$), increasing $D_{1}$ will destabilise modes with $q>\pi$,

803: while stabilising those with $q<\pi$. The discontinuous change in the

804: eigenvalues across the Bragg plane $q=\pi$ occurs first in the

805: imaginary component and the growth rate $\mbox{Im}\{\o(q)\}$ is

806: discontinuous. As the contrast $D_{1}/D_{0}$ is further increased,

807: $\mbox{Re}\{\o(q)\}$ also becomes discontinuous. This behavior can be

808: explicitly seen with perturbation analysis of Eq. \ref{ACBMATRIX} by

809: truncating the matrix and finding the four eigenvalues as $q

810: \rightarrow \pi$.

811: 

812: 

813: 

814: 

815: 

816: 

817: 

818: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}

819: 

820: We have analysed the properties of the instabilities of two fluids

821: uniformly flowing past each other, separated by an elastic plate with

822: periodic bending rigidity and/or mass density. Our generalization of

823: the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability can be quantified by finding the

824: eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a nonhermitian matrix

825: (Eq. \ref{MATRIX2}).  The imaginary components of the eigenvalues

826: $\o(q)$ determine the rate of unstable growth for eigenmodes of

827: wavevector $q$. We find that an imposed plate periodicity generally

828: destabilises the flow but that the destabilisation mainly occurs in

829: the band of wavevectors on the side of the initially most unstable

830: mode. Modes with wavevectors on the other side of the band gap from

831: the most unstable wavevector $q_{*}$ are stabilised as $D_{1}$ is

832: increased.

833: 

834: The destabilisation/stabilisation that occurs on either side of the

835: band gap can be understood in terms of $\sim 90^{\circ}$ out-of-phase

836: standing modes with wavevectors $q=(2n-1)\pi \pm \varepsilon$

837: immediately straddling the $n^{th}$ band gap. For example, if $q_{*}

838: \gtrsim (2n-1)\pi$, increasing $D_{1}$ destabilises the waves with $q

839: \approx q_{*}$ since their antinodes occur predominantly over regions

840: of lower rigidity. Modes with $q < (2n-1)\pi$, on the other side of

841: the $n^{th}$ band gap, can be significantly stabilised since they are

842: approximately $90^{\circ}$ out-of-phase, and their antinodes sample a

843: stiffer plate. The same argument applies for $q_{*} \lesssim

844: (2n-1)\pi$.

845: 

846: Our results suggest possible stability control strategies.  By adding

847: restoring forces (such as bending rigidity) with periodicity near the

848: wavelength of the most unstable mode, stability can be enhanced or

849: diminished at wavelengths either less than or greater than the band

850: gap wavelength. Stabilisation of specific modes against

851: Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities can be achieved, but at the expense of

852: destabilisation of other nearby modes.

853: 

854: Extensions of our approach to stability analysis in other

855: fluid-structure systems should be possible. For example, the

856: Orr-Sommerfeld problem (\cite{ORSZAG71}) in nonuniform Poiseuille flow

857: through periodically elastic pipes can be similarly solved.  A

858: physical realization of flow through elastically periodic pipes may

859: have arisen in the experiments of \cite{KRAMER} in which damping

860: elements were periodically embedded along an elastic pipe.  The

861: Kelvin-Helmholtz type instability has been only briefly mentioned in

862: this context by \cite{BENJAMIN} and \cite{LANDAHL}, and only in

863: uniform pipes.  Moreover, the effects of periodicity on other classes

864: of instabilities ({\it e.g.} Tollmien-Schlichting) have not been

865: explored. It would also be interesting to consider the effects of

866: dissipation, in both the fluid flow and the viscoelastic plate, on the

867: stability properties of a periodic system.

868: 

869:  

870: \acknowledgements

871: 

872: The author was supported by the US National Science Foundation through

873: grant DMS-0349195, and the US National Institutes of Health via grant

874: K25AI058672.

875: 

876: 

877: \begin{thebibliography}{}

878:   

879: \bibitem[Ashcroft \& Mermin (1976)]{AM} \textsc{Ashcroft, N. W. \&

880: Mermin, N. D.} 1976 {\it Solid State Physics}.  Thomson Learning, Inc.

881: 

882: %\bibitem[Bender \& Orszag (1978)]{BENDER} \textsc{Bender, C. M. \&

883: %Orszag, S. A.} 1978 {\it Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and

884: %Engineers}.  McGraw-Hill, New York.

885: 

886: \bibitem[Benjamin (1960)]{BENJAMIN} \textsc{Benjamin, T. Brooke} 1960 

887: {Effects of a flexible boundary on hydrodynamic stability}

888: \textit{J. Fluid Mech.} {\bf 9}, 513-533.

889: 

890: \bibitem[Bermel \& Warner (2002)]{BERMEL} \textsc{Bermel, P. A. \& 

891: Warner, M.} 2002 {Photonic band structure of cholesteric elastomers}

892: \textit{Phys. Rev.} E {\bf 65}, 056614.

893: 

894: %\bibitem[Binding (2001)]{BINDING} \textsc{Binding, P.} 2001 {Elliptic

895: %Eigenvalue problems with eigenparameter dependent boundary

896: %conditions}.  \textit{J. Differential Equations} \textbf{174} No. 1

897: %239-247

898: 

899: \bibitem[Blanford \& Rees (1974)]{REES} \textsc{Blandford, R. D. \&

900: Rees M. J.}  1974 {A `twin-exhaust' model for double radio sources.}

901: \textit{MNRAS}, \textbf{169}, 395-415.

902: 

903: \bibitem[Chandrasekar (1961)]{CHAND} \textsc{S. Chandrasekar} 1961 

904: {Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability} (Clarendon Press, Oxford)

905: 

906: \bibitem[Chen {\it et al.} (2004)]{CHEN} \textsc{Chen, L. S., Kuo,

907: C. H., Ye, Z. \& Sun, X.} 2004 {Band gaps in the propagation and

908: scattering of surface water waves over cylindrical steps.}

909: \textit{Phys. Rev. E} \textbf{69}, 066308.

910: 

911: \bibitem[Chou (1998)]{CHOU} \textsc{Chou, T.} 1998 {Band structure of

912: surface flexural-gravity waves along periodic interfaces}.

913: \textit{J. Fluid Mech.} \textbf{369}, 333-350.

914: 

915: \bibitem[Drazin \& Reid (2004)]{DRAZIN} \textsc{Drazin, P. G. \&

916: Reid, W. H.} 2004 {Hydrodynamic Stability} (Cambridge University Press, 

917: Cambridge, UK).

918: 

919: \bibitem[Frank {\it et al.} (1996)]{FRANK} \textsc{Frank, A., Jones,

920: T. W., Ryu, D. \& Gaalaas, J. B.} 1996 {The Magnetohydrodynamic

921: Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability: A two-dimensional

922: study}. \textit{Astrophysical J.} {\bf 460}, 777-793.

923: 

924: \bibitem[Hu \& Chan (2005)]{CHAN} \textsc{Hu, X. \& Chan, C. T.} 2005 

925: {Refraction of Water Waves by Periodic Cylinder Arrays}. 

926: \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 95}, 154501.

927: 

928: \bibitem[Hu {\it et al.} (2003)]{HU} \textsc{Hu, X., Shen, Y., Liu,

929: X., Fu, R. and Zi, J.}  2003 {Complete band gaps for liquid surface

930: waves propagating over a periodically drilled bottom.}

931: \textit{Phys. Rev. E} \textbf{68}, 066308.

932: 

933: %\bibitem[Ibanescu {\it et al.} (2004)]{IBAN} \textsc{Ibanescu, M.,

934: %Johnson, S. G., Roundy, D., Luo, C., Fink, Y., and Joannopolous,

935: %J. D.} 2004 {Anomalous Dispersion Relations by Symmetry Breaking in

936: %Axially Uniform Waveguides}.  \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 92},

937: %063903.

938: 

939: \bibitem[Joannopolous, Meade, \& Winn (1995)]{LIGHT}

940: \textsc{Joannopolous, J., Meade, R. D., \& Winn, J. N.} 1995 {\it Photonic

941: Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light}.  Princeton University Press,

942: Princeton, NJ.

943: 

944: \bibitem[Kr\"{a}mer (1960)]{KRAMER} \textsc{Kramer, M. O.} 1960 

945: {Boundary layer stabilization by distributed damping}.

946: {\it J. Amer. Soc. Nav. Engrs.} {\bf 72}, 25-33.

947: 

948: \bibitem[Landahl (1961)]{LANDAHL} \textsc{Landahl, M. T.} 1961 

949: {On the stability of a laminar incompressible boundary layer over a flexible surface}

950: {\it J. Fluid Mech.} {\bf 13}, 609-632.

951: 

952: \bibitem[Linton \& Evans (1990)]{LINTON} \textsc{Linton, C. M. \&

953: Evans, D. V.} 1990 {The interaction of waves with arrays of vertical

954: circular cylinders}.  {\it J. Fluid Mech.} {\bf 215}, 549-569.

955: 

956: \bibitem[Miles (1956)]{MILES} \textsc{Miles, J. W.} 1956 

957: {On the aerodynamic stability of thin panels}

958: {\it J. Aero. Sci.} {\bf 23}, 77.

959: 

960: \bibitem[Miles (2001)]{MILES01} \textsc{Miles, J.} 2001 

961: {Stability of inviscid shear flow over a flexible boundary}

962: {\it J. Fluid Mech.} {\bf 434}, 371-378.

963: 

964: \bibitem[Naciri \& Mei (1988)]{MEI1} \textsc{Naciri, M. \& Mei, C. C.}

965: 1988 {Bragg scattering of water waves by a doubly periodic seabed.}

966: \textit{J. Fluid Mech.} \textbf{192}, 51-74.

967: 

968: \bibitem[Orszag (1971)]{ORSZAG71} \textsc{Orszag, S.A.} 1971 {Accurate

969: Solution of the Orr Sommerfeld stability equation}. \textit{J. Fluid

970: Mech.} \textbf{50}, 689-703.

971: 

972: \bibitem[Peter, Meylan, \& Linton (2006)]{PETER} \textsc{Peter, M. A.,

973: Meylan, M. H. \& Linton, C. M.} 2006 {Water-wave scattering by a

974: periodic array of arbitrary bodies}. \textit{J. Fluid Mech.} {\bf 548},

975: 237-256.

976: 

977: \bibitem[Porter \& Evans (1996)]{PORTER} \textsc{Porter, R. \& Evans,

978: D. V.} 1996 {Wave scattering by periodic arrays of

979: breakwaters}. \textit{Wave Motion} \textbf{23}, 95-120.

980: 

981: \bibitem[Reiss \& Corona (1977)]{REISS} \textsc{Reiss, N. M. \& Corona, 

982: T. J.} 1977 {An Investigation of a Kelvin-Helmholtz Billow Cloud}.

983: \textit{Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society}  {\bf 58}, 159-162.

984: 

985: 

986: %\bibitem[Sen \& Arora (1988)]{SEN} \textsc{Sen, P. K. \& Arora, D. S.}

987: %1988 {On the stability of laminar boundary-layer flow over a flat

988: %plate with a compliant surface} \textit{J. Fluid Mech.} \textbf{197}

989: %201-240.

990: 

991: \bibitem[Sigalas \& Economou (1992)]{SIGALAS} \textsc{Sigalas, M. M. \& 

992: Economou, E. N.} 1992 {Elastic and acoustic wave band structure}. 

993: \textit{J. Sound and Vibration} {\bf 158}, 377-382.

994: 

995: 

996: \bibitem[Whitham (1999)]{WHITHAM} \textsc{Whitham, G. B.} 1999 {Linear

997: and Nonlinear Waves}. (Wiley Inter-Science).

998: 

999: 

1000: \end{thebibliography}

1001: 

1002: \end{document}

1003: 

1004: 

1005: 

1006: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1007: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  END  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1008: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1009: 

1010: 

1011: %in the small and large plate density limits. 

1012: %When  $m_{0}q \ll 1$, 

1013: 

1014: %\begin{equation}

1015: %\Delta(q) \approx D_{0}q^{5}+(1-\g)q - {\g \over \g +1}(\U\cd\q)^{2} -

1016: %m_{0} q{\g^{2}\over (\g+1)^{2}} (\U\cd\q)^{2} +

1017: %O(m^{2}q^{2}).

1018: %\end{equation}

1019: 

1020: %\noindent In this limit, the relations 

1021: %between $q_{*}, U_{*}$ and $D_{0}$ are

1022: 

1023: %\begin{equation}

1024: %q_{*} = q_{0} + m_{0} {\g \over 3(\g+1)} q_{0} + O(m_{0}^{2}),

1025: %\quad q_{0} = \sqrt{1-\g \over 3D_{0}},

1026: %\label{Q0}

1027: %\end{equation}

1028: 

1029: %\noindent 

1030: 

1031: %\begin{equation}

1032: %U_{*}^{2} \approx  \left[{256(1-\g^{2})^{3}(1+\g) D_{0} \over

1033: %27\g^{4}}\right]^{1/4} -{4\over 3}(1-\g)m_{0} + O(m_{0}^{2}),

1034: %\label{U0}

1035: %\end{equation}

1036: 

1037: %\noindent respectively.

1038: 

1039: %In the case of extremely massive plates ($m_{0} \rightarrow \infty$),

1040: %we find

1041: 

1042: %\begin{equation}

1043: %q_{*} \approx \left({1-\g \over 3D_{0}}\right)^{1/4} + {\g \over 3 m_{0}}

1044: %+ O(m_{0}^{-2}),

1045: %\label{QINF}

1046: %\end{equation}

1047: 

1048: 

1049: %\noindent and 

1050: 

1051: %\begin{equation}

1052: %U_{*}^{2} \approx {4D_{0} \over \g}\left({1-\g\over

1053: %3D_{0}}\right)^{3/4} + {4D_{0}\over m_{0}}\sqrt{{1-\g\over 3D_{0}}} +

1054: %O(m_{0}^{-2}).

1055: %\label{UINF}

1056: %\end{equation}

1057: