1: \documentclass[prl,amsmath,aps,twocolumn,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx,xspace}
3: \usepackage{float}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
7: \input{epsf}
8: \begin{document}
9: \newcommand{\scalar}[2]{\left \langle#1\ #2\right \rangle}
10: \newcommand{\me}{\mathrm{e}}
11: \newcommand{\mi}{\mathrm{i}}
12: \newcommand{\dif}{\mathrm{d}}
13: \newcommand{\period}{\text{per}}
14: \newcommand{\free}{\text{fr}}
15: \newcommand{\mq}[2]{\uwave{#1}\marginpar{#2}} % (margin question)
16: \include{latexcommands}
17:
18: \title{Entanglement properties and momentum distributions of hard-core anyons on a ring.}
19: \author{Raoul Santachiara} \email{santachi@lpt.ens.fr}
20: \affiliation{CNRS-Laboratoire de Physique Th\'eorique de l'Ecole Normale
21: Sup\'erieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris, France.} \author{Franck
22: Stauffer} \email{fstauffe@uni-koeln.de} \affiliation{Institute f\"ur
23: Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at zu K\"oln, Z\"ulpicherstra{\ss}e 77,
24: 50937 K\"oln, Germany } \author{Daniel C. Cabra}
25: \email{cabra@lpt1.u-strasbg.fr} \affiliation{Laboratoire de Physique
26: Th\'{e}orique, Universit\'{e} Louis Pasteur, 3 Rue de l'Universit{\'e},
27: 67084 Strasbourg, C\'edex, France.} \affiliation{Departamento de
28: F\'{\i}sica, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, C.C.\ 67, 1900 La Plata,
29: Argentina.} \affiliation{Facultad de Ingenier\'\i a, Universidad Nacional
30: de Lomas de Zamora, Cno.\ de Cintura y Juan XXIII, (1832) Lomas de Zamora,
31: Argentina.}
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34: We study the one-particle von Neumann entropy of a system of $N$
35: hard-core anyons on a ring. The entropy is found to have a clear
36: dependence on the anyonic parameter which characterizes the
37: generalized fractional statistics described by the anyons. This
38: confirms the entanglement is a valuable quantity to investigate
39: topological properties of quantum states. We derive the
40: generalization to anyonic statistics of the Lenard formula
41: for the one-particle
42: density matrix of $N$ hard-core bosons in the large $N$ limit and
43: extend our results by a numerical analysis of the entanglement
44: entropy, providing additional insight into the problem under consideration.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \maketitle
48: %
49: In recent years an intense research activity has been
50: devoted to the study of entanglement in many-body states.
51: Initially, this effort has been mostly motivated by the fact that
52: quantum correlated many-body states, which appear in various
53: solid-state models, can be valuable resources for information
54: processing and quantum computation \cite{Bennet, Nielsen}. The
55: theory of entanglement is now attracting even more attention
56: because of its fundamental implication for the development of new
57: efficient numerical methods for quantum systems
58: \cite{Verstraete,Vidal0, Cirac} and for the characterization of
59: quantum critical phases \cite{Fazio,Vidal, Fradkin}.
60:
61: %
62: Generally speaking, entanglement measures nonlocal properties of
63: composite quantum systems and it can provide additional
64: information to that obtained by investigating local observables or
65: traditional correlation functions. In this respect entanglement
66: might be a sensitive probe into the topological properties of
67: quantum states. A particularly significant quantity is the
68: entanglement entropy $S_A$, which is defined in a bipartite system
69: $A\cup B$ and quantified as the von Neumann entropy
70: $S_A=-\mbox{Tr} \rho_A \ln \rho_A$ associated to the reduced
71: density matrix $\rho_A$ of a subsystem $A$. In two-dimensional
72: systems a firm connection between topological order and
73: entanglement entropy has been established in \cite{Kitaev, Levin},
74: where the entanglement entropy was defined by spatial partitioning.
75: Recent studies on Laughlin states
76: \cite{Latorre,Schoutens} have considered
77: the entanglement entropy associated to particle partitioning
78: \cite{Latorre,Schoutens}. Also in this case, the
79: entanglement entropy turns out to reveal important aspects of the
80: topological order in Laughlin States.
81:
82:
83: The two-dimensional case is of particular interest due to the
84: existence of models whose elementary excitations exhibit
85: generalized fractional statistics. Anyons, the particles obeying
86: such statistics, play a fundamental role in the description of the
87: fractional quantum Hall effect \cite{Wilczek}. Although this
88: concept is essentially two-dimensional, anyons can also occur in
89: one-dimensional (1D) systems
90: \cite{Haldane,Zhu,Kundu,Batchelor1,Batchelor2,Batchelor3,
91: Girardeau}, where statistics and interactions are inextricable,
92: leading to strong short-range correlations. The 1D anyonic models
93: have proven useful to study persistent charge and magnetic
94: currents in 1D mesoscopic rings \cite{Zhu}. This possibility and
95: their own pure theoretical interest lead us to investigate the
96: effects of the anyonic statistics on the entanglement entropy in
97: the present Letter. A discussion about quantum statistics and
98: entanglement in a two-fermions system was introduced in
99: \cite{Schliemann} and extended to the case of two bosons in
100: \cite{Paskauskas}. A mechanism of spin-space entanglement transfer
101: based on the indistinguishability of two particle was proposed in
102: \cite{Omar} and shown to depend on the statistics (either
103: fermionic or bosonic) of the particles involved. A comparison
104: between the entanglement of two bosons and two fermions confined
105: in a 1D harmonic trap has been presented recently in \cite{Sun}.
106:
107: In this Letter, we consider a system of $N$ hard-core anyons on a
108: ring which is the direct anyonic generalization of the
109: Tonks-Girardeau gas. It offers a convenient framework to study
110: topological effects: the many body ground state is known and its
111: behaviour under the exchange of two particles interpolates between
112: bosons and fermions. We carry out an analytical and numerical
113: analysis of the dependence of the one-particle von Neumann entropy
114: on the statistical parameter which determines the symmetry of the
115: many body state. We derive the large $N$ asymptotic expression of
116: the anyonic one-particle density matrix. This asymptotic form
117: generalizes the one obtained for hard-core bosons
118: \cite{Lenard3,Forrester1} and provides a one-parameter family of
119: zero temperature momentum distributions interpolating between
120: hard-core boson and free fermion distributions. Our results show
121: that particle entanglement depends in a non-trivial manner on the
122: statistics and as such, may prove to be relevant to the study of
123: topological properties of many-body quantum states.
124:
125: Let us consider a 1D system of anyons confined on a ring of length
126: $L$ interacting each other via a repulsive $\delta-$function
127: potential. The model is defined by the Hamiltonian:
128: \begin{equation}
129: H=-\sum_{i}^{N}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_{i}^{2}}+\gamma\sum_{1\leq i<j\leq N}\delta(x_i-x_j),
130: \label{model}
131: \end{equation}
132: The $N-$anyons wave function
133: $\Psi^{\theta}(x_1,x_2,..,x_N)$ exhibits a generalized symmetry
134: under the exchange of particles:
135: \begin{equation}
136: \Psi^{\theta}(\cdots x_i,x_{i+1}\cdots)=
137: -e^{i\theta \varepsilon(x_{i+1}-x_i)}
138: \Psi^{\theta}(\cdots x_{i+1},x_i\cdots),
139: \label{anyon_exhange}
140: \end{equation}
141: where $\varepsilon(x)=0$ (or $1$) if $x>0$ ($x<0$) and $\theta$ is
142: the anyonic parameter, defined as in Ref. \cite{Zhu}. For
143: $\theta=0$ this model describes free fermions while, for
144: $\theta=\pi$, it reduces to the Lieb-Liniger Bose gas.
145:
146: As first discussed in \cite{Kundu}, the problem of 1D anyons with
147: contact interactions allows for an exact Bethe ansatz solution which
148: shows that the Hamiltonian (\ref{model}) has the same energy
149: spectrum than a 1D interacting Bose gas with anyonic
150: statistics-dependent effective coupling in the moving frame.
151: Very recently, a detailed analysis of the
152: low-energy properties of this model has been carried out in
153: \cite{Batchelor1,Batchelor2,Batchelor3}. It was shown that
154: the low-temperature thermodynamics of 1D anyons with a
155: $\delta$-function potential coincides with the one of a gas of
156: ideal particles obeying Haldane statistics: the interplay between
157: the anyonic parameter $\theta$ and the coupling constant $\gamma$
158: determines a continuous range of these generalized statistics.
159: These studies have shown that, for strong coupling, the dispersion
160: relations of the anyon gas remain linear in the thermodynamic
161: limit and the finite size corrections of the ground state energy
162: found a central charge $c=1$.
163:
164: In the case of spatial partitioning, the subsystem $A$ being a
165: block of size $l$, conformal field theory results
166: \cite{Korepin,Calabrese} predict the entanglement entropy (block
167: entropy) $S_A (l)$ to scale as $S_A(l)\sim \frac{1}{3}\ln l$. The
168: dependence on the coupling constant and on the anyonic parameter
169: is expected to show up in the sub-leading terms
170: which, to the best of our knowledge, remain unknown. Below we will demonstrate that
171: the one-particle
172: entanglement entropy $S_1^{\theta}(N)$ of $N-$anyons depends clearly on the
173: anyonic parameter. Furthermore, we will show that, for a great number N of
174: particles, the dependence of the entanglement entropy on the anyonic
175: statistics appears in the sub-leading term.
176:
177:
178: Let us consider the limit of hard-core anyons, {\it i.e.}
179: $\gamma\to\infty$. As recently shown in \cite{Girardeau}, the
180: Fermi-Bose mapping method for one dimensional hard-core bosons
181: \cite{Girardeau0} can be generalized to an anyon-fermion mapping
182: (AF).
183: %This allows for an exact solution of different models of
184: %ultracold gases with anyonic exchange statistics.
185: Imposing the exclusion principle, {\it i.e.} the vanishing of the many-body wave
186: function when two particles occupy the same position, the AF
187: mapping reads \cite{Girardeau}:
188: \begin{equation}
189: \Psi^{\theta}_{0}(x_1,\cdots,x_N)=\left[\prod_{1\leq i < j \leq N} A(x_i,x_j)
190: \right]\Psi^{F}_{0}(x_1,\cdots,x_N),
191: \label{AF}
192: \end{equation}
193: where $\Psi^{F}_{0}(x_1,\cdots,x_N)$ is the $N$ free fermion
194: ground state function and $A(x_i,x_j)= e^{i\theta
195: \varepsilon(x_i,x_j)}$. In the following, we restrict ourselves to
196: the case where $N$ is odd, which corresponds to a non-degenerate
197: ground state. The topological properties of the $N$-anyon wave
198: function are encoded in the factor $\prod_{1\leq i < j \leq N}
199: A(x_i,x_j)$ which gives the statistical phase $e^{i \theta P}$
200: resulting from the $P$ exchanges needed for the particle positions
201: to be brought to the ordering $0\leq x_1\leq x_2\leq \cdots \leq
202: x_N \leq L$. The periodic boundary conditions
203: $\Psi^{\theta}(x_1,\cdots,x_i+L,\cdots,x_N)=\Psi^{\theta}(x_1,\cdots,x_i,\cdots,x_N)$
204: impose the anyonic parameter to be an integer multiple of
205: $2\pi/(N-1)$, $\theta=\frac{2\pi}{N-1} n$.
206:
207: We are interested in computing the entropy
208: $S_1^{\theta}(N)=-\mbox{Tr}(\rho_N^{\theta} \ln \rho_N^{\theta})$,
209: where $\rho_N^{\theta}(x-x')$ is the one-particle reduced density
210: matrix:
211: \begin{eqnarray}
212: \rho_N^{\theta}(x-x')=&& \int_{0}^{L}\ldots \int_{0}^{L}
213: \prod_{i=2}^N d x_i \left[\bar{\Psi}^{\theta}(x,x_2,\cdots,x_N) \right. \nonumber \\
214: && \left.\hspace{1cm} \times\, \Psi^{\theta}(x',x_2,\cdots,x_N) \right],
215: \label{def_ro}
216: \end{eqnarray}
217: normalized such that $\rho_N(0)=1.$ In momentum
218: space, the entanglement entropy simply reads:
219: \begin{equation}
220: S_1^{\theta}(N)=-\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty }c_N^{\theta}(n) \ln c_N^{\theta}(n),
221: \label{ent_moment}
222: \end{equation}
223: where $c^{\theta}_N(n)=1/L\int_{0}^{L} \rho_N^{\theta}(x) \cos(
224: 2\pi/L n x)$ is the momentum occupation in the ground state. For $\theta=0$
225: (free fermions), one has $c^{0}_N(n)=1/N$ for $(N-1)/2\leq n \leq
226: (N+1)/2$ leading to the well known-result for free fermions
227: $S_1^{0}=\ln N$. The von
228: Neumann entropy actually measures the uncertainty about the quantum
229: state to attribute a state to the subsystem in consideration, which in
230: this case comes exclusively from the fact the
231: fermions are indistinguishable.
232:
233: The mapping (\ref{AF}) between Fermi and anyon
234: eigenfunctions preserves all scalar products and thus the energy
235: spectrum and all the probability distributions
236: involving the norm of the wave function are identical.
237: Nevertheless, $c^{\theta}_N(n)$
238: strongly depends on $\theta$ as can be guessed from the drastic
239: difference between the momentum distributions
240: of free fermions and hard-core bosons.
241:
242:
243: Analytical expressions of $c^{\pi}(n)$ for small
244: ($|n|\ll 1$) and large ($|n|\gg 1$) momenta have been found in the
245: thermodynamic limit
246: \cite{Lenard1,Lenard2,Sutherland,Vaidya1,Vaidya2}. These results
247: show a $|n|^{-1/2}$ singularity at $n=0$, reflecting the tendency
248: towards Bose-Einstein condensation. The corresponding result for
249: finite $N$ is more cumbersome. Using the $N\gg 1$ asymptotic
250: result for $\rho^{\pi}(x)$ \cite{Lenard3},
251: \begin{equation}
252: \rho^{\pi}(x)\sim\rho_{\infty}N^{-\frac{1}{2}}|\sin{\pi x/L}|^{-\frac{1}{2}},
253: \label{as_ro_bos}
254: \end{equation}
255: with $\rho_{\infty}=G(3/2)^4/\sqrt{2}$ and $G(z)$ the Barnes
256: G-function \cite{G}, $c_{n}(N)$
257: for $N\gg n$ was shown to behave like \cite{Forrester1}:
258: \begin{equation}
259: c_{n}^{\pi}(N)\sim \frac{\rho_{\infty}}{\sqrt{\pi}}
260: \frac{\Gamma(n+1/4)}{\Gamma(n+3/4)}N^{-\frac{1}{2}},
261: \label{forrestercn}
262: \end{equation}
263: where $\Gamma(z)$ is the standard Gamma function.
264: We generalized the above results to anyonic statistics.
265: Representing the density matrix (\ref{def_ro})
266: in terms of a Toeplitz $N-1\times N-1$ determinant:
267: \begin{equation}
268: N\rho^{\theta}_{N}(x)=\mbox{det}_{N-1}\left[\phi_{k,l}\right](x)
269: \label{ro_det}
270: \end{equation}
271: where
272: \begin{equation}
273: \phi_{k,l}=\int_{0}^{2 \pi}d s\frac{2 e^{i(k-l)s}}{\pi} A(s-\frac{2\pi
274: x}{L})\sin\left(\frac{s}{2}-\frac{\pi x}{L}\right)\sin\left(\frac{s}{2}\right),
275: \label{final_form}
276: \end{equation}
277: %
278: we were able to compute the asymptotic form of $\rho^{\theta}_{N}$
279: using the Fisher-Hartwig conjecture \cite{Forrester2,Basor}.
280: For $N\gg 1$ the one-particle anyon density matrix reads:
281: \begin{eqnarray}
282: \hspace{-0.5cm}\rho^{\theta}_N(x)\sim && (2 N)^{\alpha(\theta)-1} G\left(1+\frac{\theta}{2\pi}\right)^2
283: G\left(2-\frac{\theta}{2\pi}\right)^2\nonumber \\
284: &&\hspace{-1cm}\times\,
285: e^{i(\frac{\theta}{2\pi}-\frac{1}{2})}e^{-i N(\frac{\theta}{\pi}-1)\pi
286: x/L-}\left|\sin\left(\frac{\pi
287: x}{L}\right)\right|^{\alpha(\theta)-1}
288: \label{as_ro_any}
289: \end{eqnarray}
290: and $\alpha(\theta)=\frac{\theta}{\pi}(1-\frac{\theta}{2 \pi})$.
291: We see that Eq. (\ref{as_ro_bos}) is recovered for $\theta=\pi$.
292: Details of the derivation and a more complete discussion of this
293: result will be presented elsewhere \cite{paper2,Pasquale2}.
294: In the case of the generating function (\ref{final_form}) the analysis of the
295: behaviour of the Toeplitz determinant is subtle and the Fisher-Hartwig formula
296: remains a conjecture.
297: The validity of
298: Eq. (\ref{as_ro_any}) has thus be
299: compared to the numerical evaluation of the
300: determinant (\ref{ro_det}) for finite $N$.
301: % which shows the typical shape of densities
302: %when the anyonic parameter ranges from hardcore bosons to free
303: %fermions.
304: For small $\theta$, the convergence to the asymptotic result is quite slow and
305: the formula provides a rough estimate for finite $N$, as can be seen for N=121 and
306: $\theta=\pi/60$ (Fig. \ref{figFvsa} (a)). The likeness increases greatly with
307: $\theta$ and the agreement is already perfect with $\theta=\pi/2$ for $N=61$ (Fig.
308: \ref{figFvsa} (b)) and for $\theta=9\pi/10$,
close to hard-core bosons, for
309: N=21 (Fig. \ref{figFvsa} (c)).
310: \begin{figure}[ht!]
311: \begin{center}
312: \includegraphics [scale=0.6]{fig1.eps}
313: \end{center}
314: \caption{(Color online) Comparison between the numerical computation
315: (red/dark gray curve) and asymptotic equation (black curves)
316: for the one-particle
317: anyon density for: (a): $N=121,\theta=\pi/60$,
318: (b): $N=61,\theta=\pi/2$ and (c):
319: $N=21,\theta=9\pi/10$. }
320: \label{figFvsa}
321: \end{figure}
322:
323:
324: The Fourier coefficients of (\ref{as_ro_any}) can be computed
325: analytically \cite{Gradsthein}. The asymptotic behaviour of
326: $c^{\theta}_{n}(N)$ for $N\gg n$ reads:
327: \begin{eqnarray}
328: c_{n}^{\theta}(N)\sim &&\frac{1}{\pi}N^{\alpha(\theta)-1}
329: G\left(1+\frac{\theta}{2\pi}\right)^2
330: G\left(2-\frac{\theta}{2\pi}\right)^2\nonumber \\ &&
331: \hspace{0.5cm}\times \Gamma\left(\alpha(\theta)\right)\sin\left(\pi (1-\alpha(\theta)\right) \nonumber \\ &&
332: \hspace{1cm}\times \frac{\Gamma(n'+\theta^2/(4 \pi^2))}{\Gamma(n'+\theta/\pi-\theta^2/(4 \pi^2))}.
333: \label{as_ro_moment}
334: \end{eqnarray}
335: where $n'=n-\lfloor N(\theta/(2\pi) -1/2)+\theta/(4\pi)+3/4\rfloor$ with
336: $\lfloor x\rfloor$ being the integer part of $x$. A comparison between the
337: above formula and the exact results is shown in Fig. \ref{figCn}.
338: Note that, from Eq.(\ref{as_ro_any}), the number of particles occupying the
339: low-energy state ($n'=0$) scales as $N^{\alpha(\theta)-1}$, thus ruling out
340: the possibility of anyon-condensation predicted in the case of free anyons \cite{Mintchev}.
341: For $n\gg N$, the bosonic momentum
342: distribution $c_n^{\pi}$ decays like $n^{-4}$
343: \cite{Forrester1,Anna,Olshanii}. Based on exact results for $N=5,7,9$
344: and on numerical computations (see Fig. \ref{figCn}), we expect this
345: to be true for anyonic statistics as well. Under this assumption, the terms
346: $c_n^{\theta}(N)$ for $n\gg N$ will not contribute significantly
347: to the entanglement entropy. While the main contribution to $S_1^\theta(N)$ can be extracted from
348: (\ref{as_ro_moment}), the numerical simulations show that, for finite $N$, the
349: crossover region between the asymptotic (\ref{as_ro_moment}) and power-law can not be neglected, especially near the fermionic point $\theta=0$.
350: %These
351: %contributions become more and more relevant when reaching
352: %the fermionic point $\theta=0$.
353:
354: We have determined numerically the value of the one-particle von
355: Neumann entropy $S_1^{\theta}(N)$ for different values of $N$
356: (Fig. \ref{figS} (a)-(b)) which can be shown to scale with $N$ in
357: the following way:
358: \begin{equation}
359: S_1^{\theta}(N)\approx \ln N + f(\theta) + \frac{\kappa(\theta)}{\sqrt{N}}.
360: \label{eqfit}
361: \end{equation}
362: The anyonic-parameter-dependent function
363: $f(\theta)$ was determined numerically for system sizes for which the last term of this expansion can not be neglected. However, in the thermodynamic limit, only $f(\theta)$ will remain relevant in our discussion. The result of our numerical analysis are displayed in Fig. \ref{figS}, where panel (a) is the data as fitted by Eq. (\ref{eqfit}) for three values of the anyonic param eter and panel (b) is the resulting $f(\theta)$. This function decreases monotonically from free fermions to hard-core bosons where it respectively takes the value $f(0)=0$
364: and $s(\pi)\approx -0.3$, and from Fig. \ref{figS}-(b) it can be seen to be well fitted by a sinus function.
365:
366:
367: To conclude, we have investigated analytically and numerically
368: the one-particle von Neumann entropy and the momentum distributions
369: of $N$ hard-core anyons on a ring. We have determined the asymptotic
370: expressions for the one-particle density
371: matrix and for the momentum distributions. % showing the anyonic parameter gives rise to a continuous
372: %family of momentum distributions which interpolate between the bosonic and the
373: %fermionic ones.
374: Numerical results show the entanglement entropy exhibits a simple
375: and non-trivial dependence on the anyonic parameter even for
376: $N\to\infty$, making it a suitable tool to study the topological
377: properties of many-body quantum states.
378:
379: The authors thank I. Carusotto, A. Minguzzi, A. Recati and P. Scudo for
380: helpful discussions. In particular the authors thank P.Calabrese for important suggestions.
381: R.S. also thank the financial support by ANR(05-BLAN-0099-01).
382:
383: \begin{figure}[ht!]
384: \begin{center}
385: \includegraphics [angle=-90,width=\columnwidth]{fig2.eps}
386: \end{center}
387: \caption{$c^\theta_n(N)$ obtained from numerical (Color online) and
388: Eq.(\ref{as_ro_moment}) (Black line) versus $n$ for
389: $\theta=\pi/2$ and $N=61$. The inset is the same plot for $n>0$ in a log-log
390: scale (red/dark gray curve), while the dashed curve
391: is a visual guide proportional to $n^{-4}$.
392: }
393: \label{figCn}
394: \end{figure}
395:
396:
397: \begin{figure}[ht!]
398: \begin{center}
399: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{prl_entang.eps}
400: \end{center}
401: \caption{(Color online) (a): Entanglement entropy as a function of N
402: for $\theta=\pi$ (pluses), $\theta=\pi/2$ (crosses), $\theta=\pi/10$
403: (dots) in log-linear scale, fitted according to
404: Eq. (\ref{eqfit}).
405: (b): $f(\theta)$ obtained by numerical integration (pluses) and the corresponding sinus fit (plain line).}
406: \label{figS}
407: \end{figure}
408:
409:
410:
411:
412:
413:
414:
415:
416:
417:
418: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
419:
420: \bibitem{Bennet}
421: C.~H.~Bennet and D.~P.~DiVincenzo,
422: \newblock Nature {\bf
423: 404}, 247 (2000).
424:
425: \bibitem{Nielsen}
426: M.~A.~Nielsen and I.~L.~Chuang,
427: \newblock {\it Quantum computation and quantum information}
428: (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
429:
430: \bibitem{Verstraete}
431: F.~Verstraete,D.~Porras and J.~I.~Cirac,
432: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 227205 (2004)
433:
434: \bibitem{Vidal0}
435: G.~Vidal,
436: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 040502 (2004)
437:
438: \bibitem{Cirac}
439: F.~Verstraete, and J.~I.~Cirac,
440: \newblock Phys. Rev. B {\bf 73}, 094423 (2006).
441:
442: \bibitem{Fazio}
443: A.~Osterloh \textit{et al.}, % L.~ Amico, G.~ Falci, R. ~Fazio, O.~Narayan,
444: \newblock Nature {\bf
445: 416}, 608 (2002).
446:
447: \bibitem{Vidal}
448: G.~Vidal, \textit{et al.}% J.~I.~Latorre, E.~Rico and A.~Kitaev
449: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 90}, 227902 (2003)
450:
451:
452: \bibitem{Fradkin}
453: E.~Fradkin and J.~Moore
454: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 050404 (2006).
455:
456: \bibitem{Kitaev}
457: A.~Kitaev and J.~Preskill
458: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 96}, 110404 (2006).
459:
460: \bibitem{Levin}
461: M.~Levin and X.~G.~Wen
462: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 96}, 110405 (2006).
463:
464:
465: \bibitem{Latorre}
466: S.~Iblisdir, J.~I.~Latorre and R.~Orus,
467: \newblock cond-mat/0609088.
468:
469: \bibitem{Schoutens}
470: M.~Haque, O.~Zozulya and K.~Schoutens,
471: \newblock cond-mat/0609263.
472:
473: \bibitem{Wilczek} F.~Wilczek, \newblock {\it Fractional Statistics and
474: Anyon Superconductivity} (World Scientific, Singapore 1990).
475:
476:
477: \bibitem{Haldane}
478: F.~D.~Haldane,
479: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 66}, 1529 (1991).
480:
481: \bibitem{Zhu}
482: J.~Zhu and Z.~D.~Wang,
483: \newblock Phys. Rev. A {\bf 53}, 600 (1992).
484:
485: \bibitem{Kundu}
486: A.~Kundu,
487: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 83}, 1275 (1999).
488:
489: \bibitem{Batchelor1}
490: M.~T.~Batchelor, X.~W.~Guan, N.~Oelkers
491: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 96}, 210402 (2006).
492:
493:
494: \bibitem{Batchelor2}
495: M.~T.~Batchelor, X.~W.~Guan
496: \newblock Phys. Rev. B {\bf 74} 195121 (2006).
497:
498: \bibitem{Batchelor3}
499: M.~T.~Batchelor, X.~W.~Guan
500: \newblock Laser Phys. Lett. {\bf 4} 77 (2007) .
501:
502:
503: \bibitem{Girardeau}
504: M.~D.~Girardeau,
505: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 210401 (2006).
506:
507: \bibitem{Schliemann}
508: J.~Schliemann \textit{et al.} %, J.~I.~Chirac, M.~Kus, M.~Lewenstein and D.~Loss,
509: \newblock Phys. Rev. A {\bf 64}, 022303 (2001).
510:
511: \bibitem{Paskauskas}
512: R.~Pauskauskas and L.~You,
513: \newblock Phys. Rev. A {\bf 64}, 042310 (2001).
514:
515: \bibitem{Omar}
516: Y.~Omar,\textit{et al.} % N.~Paunkovic, S.~Bose and V.~Vedral,
517: \newblock Phys. Rev. A {\bf 65}, 062305 (2002).
518:
519: \bibitem{Sun}
520: B.~Sun, D.~L.~Zhou and L.~You,
521: \newblock Phys. Rev. A {\bf 73}, 12336 (2006).
522:
523:
524:
525: \bibitem{Lenard3}
526: A.~Lenard,
527: \newblock Pacific J. Math {\bf 42}, 137 (1972).
528:
529: \bibitem{Forrester1}
530: P.~J.~Forrester, \textit{et al.} % N.~E.~ Frankel, T.~M.~Garoni and N.~S.~Witte
531: \newblock cond-mat/0211126.
532:
533: \bibitem{Korepin}
534: V.~Korepin,
535: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 096402 (2004).
536:
537: \bibitem{Calabrese}
538: P.~Calabrese and J.~Cardy,
539: \newblock J. Stat. Mech. {\bf 06}, 002 (2004).
540:
541:
542: \bibitem{Refael}
543: G.~Refael and J.~E.~Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 260602 (2004).
544:
545: \bibitem{Raullo}
546: R.~Santachiara,
547: \newblock J. Stat. Mech. L06002 (2006).
548:
549: \bibitem{Laflorencie}
550: N.~Laflorencie,
551: \newblock Phys. Rev. B {\bf 72}, 140408R (2005).
552:
553:
554:
555:
556:
557:
558: \bibitem{Girardeau0}
559: M.~D.~Girardeau,
560: \newblock J. Math. Phys. {\bf 6}, 516 (1960).
561:
562: \bibitem{Lenard1}
563: A.~Lenard,
564: \newblock J. Math. Phys. {\bf 5}, 930 (1964).
565:
566:
567: \bibitem{Lenard2}
568: A.~Lenard,
569: \newblock J. Math. Phys. {\bf 7}, 1268 (1966).
570:
571:
572:
573: \bibitem{Sutherland}
574: B.~Sutherland,
575: \newblock Phys. Rev. A {\bf 4}, 2019 (1971).
576:
577: \bibitem{Vaidya1}
578: H.~G.~Vaidya and C.~A.~Tracy,
579: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 42}, 3 (1979).
580:
581: \bibitem{Vaidya2}
582: H.~G.~Vaidya and C.~A.~Tracy,
583: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 43},1540 (1979).
584:
585:
586:
587:
588:
589: \bibitem{Forrester2}
590: P.~J.~Forrester and N.~E.~ Frankel
591: \newblock J. Math. Phys. {\bf 45}, 2003 (2004).
592:
593: \bibitem{Basor}
594: E.~L.~Basor and K.~E.~Morrison,
595: \newblock Linear Algebra and Its Applications {\bf 202}, 129 (1994).
596:
597: \bibitem{G} %E. W. Barnes, Quart. J. Math. {\bf 31}, 264-314, 1899.
598: $G(z+1)=(2 \pi)^{z/2}\mbox{exp}(-(z+(\gamma_E+1)z^2)/2)\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}(1+z/k)^k
599: \mbox{exp}(-z+z^2/(2k))$ where $\gamma_E$ is the Euler constant.
600:
601: \bibitem{paper2}
602: R.~Santachiara, F.~Stauffer and D.~Cabra, unpublished.
603:
604: \bibitem{Pasquale2}
605: We have detected an error in the derivation the sinus exponent thanks to
606: the comparison with the findings of Ref.\cite{Pasquale3}.
607:
608: \bibitem{Pasquale3}
609: P~.Calabrese and M.~Mintchev,
610: \newblock cond-mat/0703117
611:
612: \bibitem{Gradsthein}
613: I.~S.~Gradshtein and I.~M.~Ryzhik,
614: \newblock {\it Table of integrals, series and products} (Academic Press,
615: London 1980).
616:
617: \bibitem{Mintchev}
618: A.~Liguori, M.~Mintchev and L.~Pilo,
619: \newblock Nucl.Phys. B{\bf 569},577 (2000).
620:
621: \bibitem{Anna}
622: A.~Minguzzi, P.~Vignolo and M.~P.~Tosi,
623: \newblock Phys. Lett. A {\bf 294}, 222 (2002).
624:
625:
626: \bibitem{Olshanii}
627: M.~Olshanii and V.~Dunjko,
628: \newblock Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91},090401 (2003).
629: \end{thebibliography}
630: \end{document}
631: