1: %\documentclass[twocolumn,prl,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs,
2: %superscriptaddress,floatfix]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[twocolumn,aps,showpacs,floats]{revtex4}
4: \documentclass[aps,floats,amssymb,prl,twocolumn,showpacs,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
5: \usepackage{calc}
6: \usepackage{psfrag}
7: \usepackage{graphicx}
8: \begin{document}
9: \def \beq{\begin{equation}}
10: \def \eeq{\end{equation}}
11:
12: \begin{abstract}
13: We study by exact diagonalization, in the lowest Landau level approximation,
14: the Coulomb interaction problem of $N = 4$ and $N = 6$ quantum dot in the
15: limit of zero Zeeman coupling. We find that meron excitations constitute
16: the lowest lying states of the quantum dots. This is based on a mapping
17: between the excitations of the dot and states of
18: the Haldane-Shastry spin chain.
19: \end{abstract}
20:
21: \pacs{73.43.Cd, 73.21.La}
22:
23: \title{Fractionalization into merons in quantum dots}
24: \author{A. Petkovi\'{c}}
25:
26: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, P.O.Box 68, 11080 Belgrade,
27: Serbia}
28: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik,
29: Universit\"at zu K\"oln, 50937 K\"oln, Germany}
30:
31: \author{M.V. Milovanovi\'{c}}
32:
33: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, P.O.Box 68, 11080 Belgrade,
34: Serbia}
35: %\author{E. Dobard\v{z}i\'{c}} \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of
36: %Belgrade, P.O. Box 368, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro}
37: %\author{Z. Radovi\'{c}} \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of
38: %Belgrade, P.O. Box 368, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro}
39:
40: \date{\today}
41: \maketitle \vskip2pc
42: \narrowtext
43:
44: {\em Introduction} Quasiparticles with fractional charge and
45: fractional statistics make a hallmark of the fractional quantum Hall (QH)
46: effect \cite{laug,halp}. They are usually found in spin polarized systems, but they
47: can be found also in the systems where Zeeman energy is negligible
48: and spin degree of freedom plays a role. In these systems quasiparticles,
49: which carry charge, can be identified with topological objects,
50: special configurations of spin in space. An example of this is
51: skyrmion, the topological object well known from classical
52: ferromagnetism \cite{rraj}, which is also a quasiparticle in the $\nu = 1$
53: QH system \cite{so}. We will show in this letter that as the size of the $\nu = 1$
54: system shrinks to quantum dot (QD) another quasiparticles of a
55: topological nature, merons \cite{oref}, enter the stage and constitute
56: the lowest lying excitations.
57:
58: Each meron is a half of skyrmion \cite{moo}. If in the center of skyrmion excitation
59: in 2D plane spin points up it slowly tumbles down to the down configuration
60: on its circular boundary. On the other hand in the case of meron spin
61: does not reach the down position on its boundary but it is half way
62: between the up and down position i.e. it is in the plane and winds
63: for $2 \pi$ along its boundary; see Fig. 1.
64:
65: \begin{figure}
66: \centering
67: \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{meron3.ps}
68: \caption{Meron quasihole.}\label{meron}
69: \end{figure}
70:
71: It is hard to prove existence of a quasiparticle in a finite, small
72: system. In order to prove the existence of merons in QDs we used
73: a mapping between seemingly uncorrelated physical systems, 2D QD with
74: zero Zeeman coupling and 1D Haldane-Shastry (HS) spin chain \cite{hs}. It is not utterly
75: suprising that it exists and maps the physics of spinons, excitations,
76: of the HS chain to the one of merons in QD. It is well known that the
77: edge of QH systems can be mapped to one-dimensional models (charge
78: excitations to Calogero-Sutherland model \cite{yy}) and this may exist even in small systems like QDs where
79: the distinction between the bulk and edge is blurred.
80:
81: {\em Model} We model a quantum dot in the regime of high magnetic
82: fields in the lowest Landau level (LLL) approximation . Accordingly
83: the Hamiltonian takes the following form,
84: \begin{equation}
85: H = H_{sp} + H_{int},
86: \end{equation}
87: where $H_{sp}$ denotes the single particle part, without the Zeeman term
88: in our case,
89: $H_{sp} = \hbar [\omega N + (\omega - \frac{1}{2} \omega_{c}) L]$,
90: where $\omega_{c} = \frac{e B}{m^{*}}$, the cyclotron frequency,
91: $\omega = \sqrt{\omega_{o}^{2} + \frac{\omega_{c}^{2}}{4}}$ where
92: $\omega_{o}$ is the frequency of the harmonic confining potential,
93: $L$ and $N$, the total orbital angular momentum and number of
94: particles of the dot respectively, and
95: $H_{int}$ denotes the interaction part,
96: \begin{equation}
97: H_{int} = \frac{1}{2}
98: \sum
99: %_{\begin{array}{c} \scriptscriptstyle m_{1},m_{2}\\
100: % \scriptscriptstyle m_{3},m_{4}\\
101: % \scriptscriptstyle \sigma,\sigma' \end{array}}
102: a^{\dagger}_{m_{1} \sigma} a^{\dagger}_{m_{2} \sigma'} a_{m_{3}
103: \sigma'} a_{m_{4} \sigma} \scriptstyle \langle m_{1}|\langle m_{2}|
104: \textstyle V_{12} \scriptstyle |m_{4}\rangle|m_{3}\rangle,
105: \end{equation}
106: where $ a^{\dagger}_{m \sigma} $ and $a_{m \sigma}$ create and
107: annihilate electron with the spin projection $\sigma$ in the single
108: particle state of the LLL with angular momentum $ m \geq 0$,
109: \begin{equation}
110: <\mathbf{r}|m> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi 2^{m} m!}} r^{m} \exp\{-im
111: \phi\} \exp\{- \frac{r^{2}}{4}\},
112: \end{equation}
113: where $\hbar =1 $ and $2 m^{*} \omega = 1$.
114: $V_{12}$ is the Coulomb interaction operator, $V_{12} = \frac{e^{2}}{4 \pi \epsilon} \frac{1}{|\vec{r}_{1} - \vec{r}_{2}|}$,
115: between two particles. As $H_{sp}$ is trivially diagonalized and accounted for, we will refer in the
116: following to the energies of $H_{int}$ as those of $H$.
117:
118: {\em HS spin chain}
119: The HS Hamiltonian is
120: \begin{equation}
121: H_{HS} = J (\frac{2\pi}{N})^{2} \sum_{\alpha < \beta}^{N}
122: \frac{\vec{S}_{\alpha} \vec{S}_{\beta}}{|z_{\alpha} -
123: z_{\beta}|^{2}},
124: \end{equation}
125: where sites $\alpha, \beta = 1, \ldots, N$ are positioned on a unit circle so that
126: each site coordinate, $ z_{\alpha}$, fulfills $z_{\alpha}^{N} - 1 = 0$, and
127: $\vec{S}_{\alpha}$'s are spin 1/2 operators.
128: Any state of the chain can be represented as a function of complex
129: numbers satisfying $z_{\alpha}^{N} = 1$, and representing sites for
130: which $S_{\alpha z} = +1/2$. In this way the ground state wave
131: function, a spin singlet, is a function of $N/2$ complex numbers,
132: $\Psi(z_{1}, \ldots, z_{N/2}) = \prod_{j < k}^{N/2} (z_{j} -
133: z_{k})^{2} \prod_{j = 1}^{N/2} z_{j}.$ Spinons, elementary
134: excitations, are quasiparticles of spin 1/2.
135: The hallmark of the HS spin chain is the existence of
136: ``supermultiplets", degenerate energy eigenstates of the same spinon
137: number but different spin. The structure of eigenstates is built on so-called
138: ``fully (spin-)polarized spinon gas" (FPSG) states \cite{hs}
139: with definite spinon number and maximum spin equal to the half
140: of the spinon number. Their corresponding, degenerate states can be
141: found by acting with an operator of the Yangian algebra,
142: inherent to the model for which the FPSG states are highest weight states.
143: In the case of two spinons we have two
144: degenerate states a triplet and a singlet and the latter wavefunction is
145: $\Psi^{'}(z_{1},\ldots, z_{N/2}) = \prod_{j < k}^{N/2} (z_{j} -
146: z_{k})^{2} [ 1 - \prod_{j = 1}^{N/2} z_{j}^{2}]$.
147:
148: {\em Motivation behind Numerical Calculations} We will present our numerical
149: work later on, but here we will give just a synopsis of what can be established
150: on the basis of the numerical work and how this can be used to prove the
151: existence of merons.
152:
153: In the case of polarized electrons, QD at $\nu =1$ is in a stable
154: state, so-called maximum density droplet (MDD) state, where each
155: angular momentum orbital till its maximum value $N - 1$ is filled.
156: Therefore its total angular momentum is $M = N (N - 1)/2$. In this
157: system the existence of vortex (dressed hole) quasiparticle
158: excitation is firmly established \cite{oak,saar,man}. As we slowly
159: increase the magnetic field (from the MDD value) a particle-hole
160: vortex excitation is formed, where the vortex occupies an inner
161: orbital of the MDD state and at the same time pushes charge outside
162: and creates a particle on the edge. This process is followed by
163: gradual increase of $M$. If QD is small enough this description may
164: persist to the point when the vortex quasiparticle is created at the
165: center which can be associated with the total increase of $\Delta M
166: = N$ of the angular momentum as implied by the shift register
167: counting of Laughlin \cite{qhla}, or, therefore, an increase of one
168: flux quantum in the magnetic flux through the system. Therefore the
169: lowest lying excitations of the dot as the magnetic field is
170: increased can be described through vortex excitations which makes
171: the vortex an eigenstate of the polarized system.
172:
173: We will show that a similar process happens with unpolarized electrons,
174: starting from the MDD configuration \cite{ref}, where the quasiparticle that slowly
175: sweeps the inner orbitals, pushes charge outside, and finally is created
176: at the center is meron. Therefore even in this case we will recover usual
177: quasiparticle-hole phenomenology of a QH system and therefore
178: prove the existence of merons. The meron is half of skyrmion, and to skyrmion
179: an increase of one flux quantum is associated because skyrmions are analogs
180: of hole (vortex) excitations in the limit of weak Zeeman coupling \cite{so}. Therefore if we create
181: a meron at the center we expect half flux quantum increase in the flux through the system
182: and associated increase of $\Delta M = N/2$ in the total angular momentum.
183: That should be also period for which we expect appearance of merons of
184: higher winding number in very small dots; see $N = 4$ example below.
185:
186: Our findings support that the MDD state, with respect
187: to its spin content, can be viewed as a condensate of $N$ merons spin
188: $\frac{1}{2}$ where each two merons pair to one hole (a vortex)
189: \cite{lc}. We will call these quasiparticle (not quasihole) kind of merons condensate merons.
190: We find, while establishing a mapping between the dot and the HS chain
191: that the ferromagnetically ordered MDD state
192: corresponds to the $ 2 S = N$, maximum number of spinons, HS $N$ site spin
193: chain state.
194: This state, except for the spin degeneracy,
195: is a unique state
196: of the chain. When a quasiparticle, more precisely a meron quasihole,
197: enters the dot, the number of condensate merons is reduced, by
198: creation of a quasiparticle-hole pair, to $N - 2$. We find that as an effect the
199: succesive quasihole orbital states as it enters a dot can be
200: associated to half of (see \cite{ch}) the $N - 2$ spinon sector of the HS $N$ site spin
201: chain. Therefore merons map to spinons and we are establishing merons as
202: eigenstates of dot problem \cite{comment}.
203:
204:
205: \begin{figure}
206: \centering
207: \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{N=4var.ps}
208: \caption{Spin-spin correlations along fixed radii of lowest lying, spin-singlet states
209: of the $N = 4$ dot. The reference points are on the positive
210: side of $x$ axis. On the rhs are two possible classical meron configurations
211: where only the characteristic spin windings along the meron edge are shown.}\label{figN=4}
212: \end{figure}
213:
214: {\em N =4 dot} In Fig. 2 we show spin-spin correlations along fixed
215: radii, of lowest lying, at fixed $L$, spin singlet states. On the
216: rhs of Fig. 2 shown are two possible types of (classical)
217: configurations, windings of merons at their edges projected to four
218: sites. The occurence of black regions correspond to our expectations
219: where to find antiferromagnetic correlations according to the
220: classical configurations at some radii, which turn out to be near or
221: at the maximum (radial) density radius. Similar results already
222: appeared in \cite{im} but not with emphasis on the $\frac{N}{2}$
223: periodicity (the $L$ of MDD is at $L = \frac{N(N-1)}{2} = 6$), and
224: meron interpretation we are pointing out here. And indeed after a
225: detailed investigation we found also $RVB^{+}$ and $RVB^{-}$ four
226: site spin states \cite{im} to describe these states, $L = 10$ and
227: $L = 8$ respectively, but in addition
228: we identified these states with the
229: gound and two spinon lowest lying singlet state of the HS four site spin
230: chain respectively.
231: Moreover at $L =8$ we identified, with respect to the lowest lying, a nearly
232: degenerate $S = 1$ state with the triplet, $z^{2}$ state of the HS, and this
233: is in the accordance with the mapping to the two degenerate states,
234: a singlet ($RVB^{-}$) and a triplet ($z^{2}$) of the $N -2 = 2$ spinon sector of the
235: HS chain. Also at $L = 7$ we found the triplet $z^{3}$ two spinon state of
236: the chain as expected \cite{hs}.
237: \begin{figure}
238: \centering
239: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{L=18.ps}
240: \caption{The map of the spin-spin correlations of the lowest lying,
241: spin-singlet state at $L = 18$ of the $N = 6$ dot. In the lower
242: right corner is the classical meron edge configuration for
243: comparison. }\label{sl2}
244: \end{figure}
245:
246:
247: {\em N =6 dot} Also in the case of the $N = 6$ dot we will recover
248: meron quasiparticle-hole states as the lowest lying ones for angular
249: momenta higher than, but still near, the MDD state. First we can
250: notice in Fig. 3 at $\Delta M = N/2 = 3,\; M = 18$ a meron quasihole
251: created at the center of the dot. Before reaching that state as the
252: magnetic field is gradually increased from the MDD state the system
253: passes through the states at $M = 16$ and $M = 17$ analyzed in Fig.
254: 4. As announced we expect that the $N - 2 = 4$ spinon sector of the
255: HS chain is associated with the states at $M = 16, 17,$ and $18$.
256: And indeed just above $L = \frac{N(N - 1)}{2} = 15$ at $L = 16$ and
257: $L = 17$ we easily identified these HS states as in Fig. 4 where
258: corresponding states are noted. Plotted are ratios of calculated
259: real parts of $S^{+} S^{-}$ correlations as functions of radius of
260: the dot states subtracted by the same ratios for the HS $N = 6$
261: chain for expected HS states. We take ratios because of different
262: electron densities at different dot radii. In general we define the
263: quantities displayed in Fig. 4 as
264: \begin{equation}
265: f_{ab} = \frac{Re\langle S^{+}(r, 0) S^{-}(r, a)\rangle}{Re\langle
266: S^{+}(r, 0) S^{-}(r, b)\rangle} -\frac{Re\langle S^{+}(0)
267: S^{-}(a)\rangle|_{HS}}{Re\langle S^{+}(0) S^{-}(b)\rangle|_{HS}},
268: \end{equation}
269: where $a$ and $b$ take values 1,2, and 3 denoting the angles, with
270: respect to the positive $x$-axis, represented on the hexagon in the
271: upper right corner of Fig.3. Other HS states with respect to the
272: shown do not show the nice confluences of all three lines, $f_{12},
273: f_{13}$, and $f_{23}$, at their simultaneous value zero at a single
274: radius; they are completely off and uncorrelated. Similarly we can
275: define quantities with the imaginary parts of $S^{+} S^{-}$
276: correlations. Some of them are identically zero, due to the same
277: real correlation property of HS and QD states, and the rest are
278: compatible to and very suggestive of the trend
279: around the special radius that exists in real parts (Fig. 4).
280: That again is the behavior we see only for these special HS states.
281: %The same quantities can be defined with imaginary parts of correlations
282: %and they are displayed in Fig. 4.
283: %When compared with absolute values of correlations the discrepancies,
284: %from the confluence points we see in Fig. 3, are negligible.
285: We find that the HS states' conditions, including $S_{z} S_{z}$ correlations,
286: are satisfied at the radius (Fig. 4)slightly beyond the maximum density radius.
287: \begin{figure}
288: \centering
289: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{crtacrta.ps}
290: \caption{Quantities $f_{12}$ - full, $f_{13}$ - dotted, and $f_{23}$ -
291: dashed, for the definitions see the text, as functions of radius. The
292: quantities should go to zero, simultaneously if the corresponding HS
293: state, in the Figure denoted for each angular momentum, for $L = 18$ see
294: the text, describes
295: the dot state correlations along a fixed radius. (Asymptotes are
296: also shown.)}\label{figenergija}
297: \end{figure}
298: \begin{figure}
299: \centering
300: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{energije1.ps}
301: \caption{The spectrum of the $N =6$ dot as a function of angular
302: momentum. Lowest energy, closely lying levels correspond to HS
303: supermultiplets \cite{hs}.}\label{sl1}
304: \end{figure}
305:
306: For $L =17$ we found the $S =2$, $z^{4}$ closely lying, first excited
307: state that belongs to the expected \cite{hs} HS two state degenerate supermultiplet (Figs. 4 and 5.).
308: We emphasize that although the results of the $N = 4$ case
309: may be justified or expected because of early (for small L)
310: Wigner crystal formation \cite{maks}, we checked that for $L = 15 - 18$,
311: in the $N = 6$ case there is no underlying Wigner crystal configuration \cite{gu}.
312: The mapping does not require underlying crystal structure, and may
313: persist in dots with $N$ higher than $6$.
314:
315:
316: In Fig. 5 we see clearly, beside the $L= 17$ multiplet,
317: the existence of an additional multiplet at $L = 18$, with three states,
318: that we expect \cite{hs} if we identify the $S =0$ state as the lowest lying
319: $S = 0$ state in the 4-spinon sector,
320: \begin{equation}
321: \Psi_{S = 0} = \prod_{i<j}^{M} (z_{i} - z_{j})^{2} \prod_{i}^{M} z_{i} + 15 \{ \prod_{i}^{M} z_{i} +
322: \prod_{i}^{M} z_{i}^{3} + \prod_{i}^{M} z_{i}^{5} \},
323: \end{equation}
324: where $M = 3$. And indeed we were able to do that, the analysis is
325: given in Fig. 3, where we see a clear correspondence
326: between the classical meron edge configuration ($2\pi$ winding of
327: the spin vector in the plane)
328: and the spin-spin correlation map, and in Fig. 4, but
329: less easily than the lower momentum states. The reason is that we
330: are already approaching a transition region to the Wigner regime
331: \cite{bed,har} where
332: the Wigner structure
333: with a pentagon and an electron in the middle competes
334: with the hexagonal structure \cite{apmm}. Therefore the transition region
335: may well consists of liquid states of merons similarly
336: to what happens in the polarized case with vortices \cite{man}.
337: %(So although we checked that the 2-spinon lowest lying spin-singlet and ground state
338: %of the $N =6$ HS chain correspond to the $n = 2$ and $n = 3$ meron number
339: %($4\pi$ and $6\pi$ spin windings) excitations we could not find their realizations
340: %at $L = 21$ and $L = 24$ in the dot spectrum.)
341:
342:
343:
344: {\em Final Remarks} The physics of exchange \cite{so,moo} that
345: favors smooth variations of spin in space, favors meron solutions
346: instead of skyrmion ones in small systems, in the limit of zero
347: Zeeman coupling. Merons distort spin at slower rate than skyrmions,
348: although acquire also energy due to winding over the space of the
349: system. This second contribution is suppressed in small systems
350: \cite{ed} where merons, as we demonstrated here, constitute lowest
351: lying eigenstates.
352:
353: The meron physics
354: should be detectable in lateral quantum dots, in which interaction
355: effects are strong, in their not yet explored regime beyond the MDD
356: state \cite{ni}. The same conclusions are valid for rapidly rotating
357: fermi atoms, where there is no Zeeman effect to disguise the
358: fractionalization into merons, and, therefore, the RVB and spinon
359: physics implied by the mapping to the HS chain may reveal more
360: easily.
361:
362:
363: M.V.M. thanks E. Dobard\v{z}i\'{c} and Z. Radovi\'{c} for previous
364: collaboration. The work was supported by
365: Grant No. 141035 of the Serbian Ministry of Science.
366: \begin{references}
367: \bibitem{laug} R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 50}, 1395 (1983).
368: \bibitem{halp} B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 52}, 1583 (1984).
369: \bibitem{rraj} R. Rajaraman, {\it Instantons and solitons}, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987).
370: \bibitem{so} S.L. Sondhi et al., Phys. Rev. B {\bf 47},
371: 16419 (1993).
372: %\bibitem{so} S.L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S.A. Kivelson, and E.H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 47},
373: %16419 (1993).
374: \bibitem{oref} D.J. Gross, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 132}, 439 (1978); I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett.
375: {\bf 56}, 408 (1986).
376: \bibitem{moo} K. Moon et al., Phys. Rev. B {\bf 51}, 5138 (1995).
377: \bibitem{hs} F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 60}, 635 (1988); {\bf 66}, 1529 (1991);
378: B.S. Shastry, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 60}, 639 (1988);
379: %also see R.B. Laughlin in ``Field Theories for Low-Dimensional Condensed Matter Systems",
380: %edited by G. Morandi, P. Sodano, A. Tagliacozzo, and V. Tognetti (Springer, Berlin, 2000).
381: \bibitem{yy} H. Azuma and S. Iso, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 331}, 107
382: (1994).
383: % Y. Yu and Z.Y. Zhu, Commun. Theor. Phys. {\bf 29}, 351 (1998); Y.
384: %Yu, J. Zheng, and Z.Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 56}, 13 279 (1997).
385: \bibitem{oak} J.H. Oaknin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74}, 5120 (1995).
386: \bibitem{saar} H. Saarikoski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 116802 (2004).
387: \bibitem{man} M. Manninen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 106405 (2005).
388: \bibitem{qhla} R.B. Laughlin in {\it The Quantum Hall Effect}, 2nd ed.,
389: edited by R.E. Prange and S.M. Girvin (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990).
390: \bibitem{ref} Here we use the notion of the MDD state not as of
391: a maximum possible density state, but as the one in which in the orbital space,
392: each orbital till the value $N - 1$ is filled by exactly one electron.
393: \bibitem{lc} We noticed the presence of vortex excitations in the low lying spectrum.
394: \bibitem{ch} As may be expected only one chirality (angular momentum direction) branch
395: maps to the states of QD in a magnetic field.
396: \bibitem{comment} It is not surprising that the mapping we find is to the HS chain. The chain
397: is a paradign of quantum antiferromagnet fractionalization and its excitations,
398: spinons, have semionic statistics. Merons as halfs of skyrmions, which at
399: $\nu = 1$ carry fermionic statistics, are expected to have semionic statistics.
400: In principle it is hard to talk about statistics in small systems but if
401: we have signatures of statistics in small chains \cite{hs}, to which mapping is possible,
402: they should carry information of the expected quasiparticle statistics in QDs.
403: \bibitem{im} H. Imamura, H Aoki, and P.A. Maksym, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 57}, R4257 (1998); H. Imamura,
404: P.A. Maksym, and H. Aoki, Physica B 249-251, 214 (1998).
405: %\bibitem{sao} H. Saarikoski and A. Harju, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 246803 (2005).
406: %\bibitem{sil} S. Siljamaki {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 121306(R) (2002).
407: %\bibitem{sat} H. Saarikoski, A. Harju, M.J. Puska, and R.M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 116802 (2004).
408: %\bibitem{zee} A design for a small average $g$-factor, $|g| \approx 0$, was put forward
409: %in G. Salis {\em et al.}, Nature {\bf 414}, 619 (2001), and applied recently for two electrons
410: %in a lateral quantum dot in C. Ellenberger {\em et al.}, cond-mat/0512410.
411: %\bibitem{oak} J.H. Oaknin, L. Martin-Moreno, J.J. Palacios, and C. Tejedor, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 74}, 5120 (1995).
412: %Notice also the kind of pairing
413: %expected for the $\nu=2$ case - one hole per half of
414: %a skyrmion i.e. a meron as in D.-H. Lee and C.L. Kane, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 64}, 1313 (1990).
415: \bibitem{maks} P.A. Maksym, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 53}, 10871 (1996).
416: \bibitem{gu} The same conclusion was reached in A.D. Guclu and C.J. Umrigar, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 72}, 045309 (2005).
417: \bibitem{bed} V.M. Bedanov and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 49}, 2667 (1994).
418: \bibitem{har} A. Harju, S. Siljamaki, and R.M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 075309 (2002).
419: %\bibitem{dot} L.P. Kouwenhoven, D.G. Austing, and S. Tarucha, Rep. Prog. Phys. {\bf 64},
420: %701 (2001); M.A. Kastner, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) {\bf 9}, 885 (2000); L. Jacak,
421: %P. Hawrylak, and A. W\'{o}js, {\em Quantum Dots} (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998).
422: %\bibitem{drop} P.A. Maksym and T. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 65}, 108 (1990);
423: %A. H. MacDonald, S. R. Eric Yang, and M.D. Johnson, Aust. J. Phys. {\bf 46},
424: %345 (1993).
425: %Phys. Rev. B {\bf 45}, 1947 (1992); P. A. Maksym, Physica B {\bf 184}, 385 (1993).
426: %\bibitem{pmc} P.L. McEuen {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 66}, 1926 (1991);
427: %\bibitem{spinf} P.L. McEuen {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 45}, 11419 (1992);
428: %O. Klein {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf74}, 785 (1995).
429: %O. Klein {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 53}, R4221 (1996).
430: %\bibitem{wh} A. W\'{o}js and P. Hawrylak, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 56}, 13227 (1997).
431: %\bibitem{kh} M. Korkusi\'{n}ski {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett.
432: %{\bf 93}, 206806 (2004).
433: %\bibitem{kh} M. Korkusi\'{n}ski,
434: %P. Hawrylak, M. Ciorga, M. Pioro-Ladri\`{e}re, and
435: %A.S. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 93}, 206806 (2004).
436: %\bibitem{kit} A. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. {\bf 303}, 2 (2003).
437: %\bibitem{sarma} S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
438: %166802 (2005).
439: %, H. Mori, Kun Yang, S.M. Girvin, A.H. MacDonald, L. Zheng, D. Yoshioka, and Shou-Cheng Zhang, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 51}, 5138 (1995).
440: %\bibitem{mvm} For the justification of this special choice see below and
441: %M.V. Milovanovi\'{c}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 205321 (2003).
442: %\bibitem{hal}
443:
444: %\bibitem{oak} J.H. Oaknin, L. Martin-Moreno, and C. Tejedor, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 16850 (1996).
445: %\bibitem{oos} T.H. Oostercamp {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 2931 (1999).
446: %\bibitem{mr} G. Moore and N. Read, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 360}, 362 (1991).
447: %\bibitem{mmr} M. Milovanovi\'{c} and N. Read, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 53}, 13 559 (1996).
448: %\bibitem{rr} N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 54}, 16 864 (1996).
449: %\bibitem{xgw} X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 70}, 355 (1993).
450: %\bibitem{ki} A. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. {\bf 303}, 2 (2003).
451: %\bibitem{notes} M.V. Milovanovi\'{c}, unpublished
452: %This
453: %scenario of the HS chain ground states
454: % is very plausible also due to the existence of spin-neutral excitations discovered in the
455: %neighborhood of the highly correlated, depolarized states with energies much below
456: %Zeeman gap \cite{haw}. We expect that the HS chain describes the spin part of the
457: %$\nu = 2$ edge theory.
458: %\bibitem{pee} M.B. Tavernier {\em et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 68}, 205305 (2003).
459: %\bibitem{kit} A. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. {\bf 303}, 2 (2003).
460: %\bibitem{sarma} S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
461: %166802 (2005).
462: %\bibitem{zh} F. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 80401 (2001); J.W. Reijnders, F.J.M. van Lankvelt,
463: %K. Schoutens, and N. Read, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 69}, 023612 (2004).
464: %\bibitem{rm} G. Moore and N. Read, Nucl. Phys. \bf{B} 360, 362
465: %(1991).
466: \bibitem{apmm} A. Petkovi\'{c} and M.V. Milovanovi\'{c}, unpublished
467: \bibitem{ed} E. Dobard\v{z}i\'{c}, M.V. Milovanovi\'{c}, and Z. Radovi\'{c}, unpublished
468: \bibitem{ni} A recent study of $N = 5$ electrons in a vertical quantum dot showed partially
469: polarized states beyond the MDD, Y. Nishi et al., Phys. Rev. B {\bf
470: 74}, 033306 (2006).
471: %\bibitem{haw} P. Hawrylak et al., Phys. Rev. B {\bf 59}, 2801 (1999).
472: %\bibitem{haw} P. Hawrylak, C. Gould, A. Sachrajda, Y. Feng, and Z. Wasilewski, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 59}, 2801 (1999).
473: \end{references}
474: \end{document}
475: