1: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb,aps,prl]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[onecolumn,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb,aps,prl]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[onecolumn,showpacs,amsmath,amssymb,aps,draft]{revtex4}
4:
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \usepackage{bm}
7: \usepackage{epsfig}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11:
12: \title{Rocking
13: ratchets in 2D Josephson networks: collective effects and current reversal}
14:
15: \author{Ver\'onica I. Marconi}
16:
17: \affiliation{Institut de physique, Universit\'e de Neuch\^{a}tel,
18: CH-2000 Neuch\^{a}tel, Switzerland.}
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21:
22: A detailed numerical study on the directed motion of ac-driven vortices and antivortices in 2D
23: Josephson junction arrays (JJA) with an asymmetric periodic pinning potential is reported. Dc-voltage
24: rectification shows a strong dependence on vortex density as well as an inversion of the vortex flow
25: direction with ac amplitude for a wide range of vortex density around $f$=1/2 ( $f$=$Ha^2 / \Phi_0$), in
26: good agreement with recent experiments by Shal\'om and Pastoriza [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 177001 (2005)]. The study
27: of vortex structures, spatial and temporal correlations, and vortex-antivortex pairs formation gives
28: insight into a purely collective mechanism behind the current reversal effect.
29: \end{abstract}
30: \pacs{74.81.Fa, 74.25.Qt, 85.25.Cp}
31: \maketitle
32:
33:
34:
35: Ratchet systems constitute a vast subject of present interest, extensively studied from biology
36: to a wide spectrum of fields in physics \cite{julicher, reimann, menon, astumian, linke}. Very
37: recently, promising applications in micro-nano technology have motivated a huge amount of additional
38: works, mainly regarding the controlled motion of nanoparticles, colloids, electrons or magnetic flux quanta.
39: The main characteristic of these systems is their ability to transport particles with a non-zero drift
40: velocity in the absence of any net macroscopic force. The simplest realization of this idea is the
41: rectification of an ac-driven single particle motion in an asymmetric periodic potential or ratchet
42: potential, known as a {\it rocking ratchet}. Ratchet effect in superconductors (SC) has been, in
43: particular, an attractive subject of study since the proposal of using it to remove undesirable trapped
44: vortices producing noise in SC devices \cite{barabasi99}. Notably, several designs of asymmetric pinning
45: potentials for the motion of flux quanta have been recently realized, such as dots-antidots arrays of
46: pinning sites in SC films \cite{films}. Even more, ratchet designs without spatial asymmetry have been
47: successfully achieved in layered SC \cite{cole}. Small Josephson junction (JJ) systems were investigated
48: as well: SQUIDs \cite{sols}, 1D ladders\cite{falo, trias}, long JJ \cite{goldobin} and quasi-1D quantum
49: JJA \cite{majer}. In particular, on classical JJA, the first design of a device for kinks motion
50: rectification was proposed \cite{falo} and measured \cite{trias} in 1D.
51:
52: Large 2D JJA, which are excellent systems to study statistical mechanics experimentally \cite{tink} and
53: where collective effects could play a relevant role, had not been studied until very recently.
54: Rectification experiments on 2D JJA were reported by Shal\'om and Pastoriza \cite{pastoriza}. They
55: modulated the distance between the SC islands thus generating a ratchet potential for vortex motion.
56: Dc-voltage rectification was then clearly observed and its intriguing features, such as a non trivial
57: dependence on both, the applied ac current and vortex density, and an inversion of the vortex flow
58: direction, prompt further investigation. The aim of this work is to interpret such experiments and
59: understand the role of collective effects. We show numerically that the overdamped RSJ model for large
60: 2D JJA with asymmetrically modulated critical currents, reproduces successfully the experiments
61: \cite{pastoriza} and allows for a detailed characterization of the device useful for performance
62: enhancement and future experiments. In addition, a complete study of the vortex dynamics gives insight
63: into a non trivial collective mechanism behind the current reversal (CR) effect.
64:
65:
66: We study the overdamped vortex dynamics in square {\it 2D asymmetrically modulated} JJA using the
67: resistively shunted junction (RSJ) model \cite{dyna} and solving numerically the superconducting phase
68: dynamics. The current flowing in the junction between two superconducting islands is the sum of the
69: Josephson supercurrent and the normal current:
70: $
71: I_{\mu }({\bf n})=I_{0}
72: \sin \theta_{\mu }({\bf n})+\frac{\Phi_{0}}
73: {2\pi cR_{N}}\frac{\partial \theta _{\mu }({\bf n})}{\partial t}+
74: \eta _{\mu}({\bf n},t),
75: $
76: where $I_0$ is the critical current of the junction between
77: the two superconducting islands sited in ${\bf n}$ and ${\bf n}+{\bf \mu}$ on a square lattice
78: [${\bf n}$=$(n_x,n_y)$, ${\bf \mu}$=${\bf \hat x},
79: {\bf \hat y}$], $\theta_{\mu}({\bf n})$=$\theta({\bf n}+{\bf \mu})-\theta({\bf
80: n})-A_{\mu}({\bf n})$ the
81: gauge invariant phase difference with $A_{\mu}({\bf n})$=$\frac{2\pi}{\Phi_0}
82: \int_{{\bf n}a}^{({\bf n}+{\bf\mu})a}{\bf A}\cdot d{\bf l}$,
83: $\Phi _{0}$ the flux quantum, $a$ the lattice parameter,
84: and $R_N$ the normal state resistance.
85: Under a magnetic field $H$, we have
86: $\Delta_{\mu}\times A_{\mu}({\bf n})$=
87: $2\pi f$, $f$=$H a^2/\Phi_0$ being the frustration parameter,
88: a measure of the vortex density.
89: The Langevin
90: noise term $\eta _{\mu }$ models the contact with a thermal bath at temperature
91: $T$ and satisfies $ \langle \eta _{\mu }({\bf n},t)\eta _{\mu ^{\prime }} ({\bf
92: n^{\prime }},t^{\prime })\rangle$=$\frac{2k_BT}{R_{N}}\delta _{\mu ,\mu ^{\prime
93: }}\delta _{ {\bf n},{\bf n^{\prime }}}\delta (t-t^{\prime })$.
94: The ratchet potential for vortices is introduced by modulating the critical currents $I_{0}$=$E_J\Phi_{0}/
95: 2\pi$, $E_J$ being the Josephson coupling energy between islands. We consider a sawtooth modulation
96: $I_0(n_x)$ increasing linearly from
97: $I_{0_{min}}$ to $I_{0_{max}}$ within each period, $p$, as an approximation to the experimental modulation. The ratchet potential amplitude is then measured by $\Delta U \propto \Delta I_0 $=$ (I_{0_{max}}-I_{0_{min}})$.
98: The system is driven by $I_{ext}$=$I_{ac}\sin(2\pi\omega_{ac}t)$ in the ${\bf \hat y}$ direction. Periodic
99: boundary conditions in both directions are taken (see model details in \cite{prb2}). The dynamical equations
100: for the superconducting phases are obtained after considering conservation of the current in each node. The
101: resulting set of Langevin equations are solved using a $2^{nd}$ order Runge-Kutta algorithm with time
102: step $\Delta t$=$0.1\tau_J$ ($\tau_J$=$2\pi cR_N \overline{I_0} /\Phi_0$, where $\overline{I_0}$ is the
103: averaged critical current) and integration time $2.10^6 \tau_J$ after the equilibration transient.
104: We calculate:
105: mean dc voltage as $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$=-$\langle d\theta_y({\bf n})/dt\rangle$ \cite{prb2} vs both $I_{ac}$ and $f$ where $<$..$>$ stands for both time and space average; vorticity at the plaquette ${\bf \tilde n}$=$(n_x+1/2,n_y+1/2)$, as $b({\bf \tilde n})$=$-\Delta_\mu\times{\rm nint}[\theta_\mu({\bf n})/2\pi]$ \cite{ijja} (nint[] is the nearest integer function). Currents are normalized by $\overline{I_0}$, voltages by $R_
106: {N}\overline{I_0}$, temperature by $\overline{E_J}/k_B$ and frequencies by
107: $(\tau_J)^{-1}$.
108: Most of the results shown are (except indication) for
109: $p$=$8$, $I_{0_{min}}$=$0.5
110: \overline{I_0}$, $I_{0_{max}}$=$1.5 \overline{I_0}$, $\omega_{ac}$=$10^{-4}$,
111: $T$=$0.05$ and 32$\times$32 arrays.
112: Other parameters as $p$=$7,10,15$ and $\Delta I_0$=$0.5,1.5,2$ were as well investigated. The full range of magnetic field was explored,
113: from a single vortex to the fully frustrated case ($f$=$1/2$) in
114: system with $L$=$L_x$=$L_y$=$32,64,100,128$.
115: \begin{figure}
116: \centerline{\includegraphics*[width=7.cm]{f1.eps}}
117: %\centerline{\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{../f1/f1.pdf}}
118: \caption{
119: Rectified vortex motion:
120: $I_{ac}-V_{dc}$ characteristics examples increasing
121: vortex density, from one vortex in the sample ($f$=$1/L^2$) towards $f$=$1/2$.
122: Inset: $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$ vs $I_{ac}$ for $f$=$1/32$, in log-log scale (right y-axis)
123: and vortex-antivortex pairs density normalized by frustration,
124: $n_{va}/f$ (left y-axis).
125: }
126: \label{fig:ivs}
127: \end{figure}
128:
129: {\it Results}. In Fig.\ref{fig:ivs} we show mean dc-voltage, $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$, vs the amplitude
130: of the ac current, $I_{ac}$, for different vortex densities, $f$. These results imply rectification: a net
131: directional vortex motion parallel to the ratchet modulation in response to an alternating force. For low
132: $f$, $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$ is maximum at an optimal value of $I_{ac}$ and decreases slowly for larger
133: $I_{ac}$ as the ratchet potential is effectively washed out by the fast vortex motion. This behavior is
134: qualitatively the one expected for a single particle rocking ratchet system \cite{reimann}. Let us note
135: however that even for highly diluted vortex systems the intensity of rectification is not additive: for
136: example with $f$=$1/32$ in a $32 \times 32$ array we have 32 vortices but as we can see in Fig.\ref{fig:ivs}
137: the response is $\sim$12 times, and not 32 times the response of one single vortex ($f$=$1/L^2$). This
138: non-additivity is even more pronounced for higher $f$. By increasing frustration from $f$=$1/32$ to
139: $f$=$1/2$ the rectification peak presents both a reduction and a shift of the optimal $I_{ac}$ value. A more
140: intriguing feature appears when $f$ is further increased. For $0.17 \lesssim f < 1/2$ an inversion of the
141: vortex flow direction is observed at small $I_{ac}$ values and the window with $\langle V_{dc} \rangle <
142: 0$ becomes wider as $f$ is increased. The non monotonic behavior observed as a function of $f$ is a clear evidence that
143: vortex-vortex interactions are relevant for the rectification effect at all $f$. On the other hand it is well known that the frustrated XY-model, equivalent to our model for 2D JJA
144: under an external $H$ \cite{tink}, can also present a finite density of thermally excited
145: vortex-antivortex pairs, $n_{va}$=$(\langle|b({\bf\tilde{n}})| \rangle-f)/2$, over the magnetic field
146: induced vortex pattern. It is then important to under\-stand its contribution to the ratchet effect. In the
147: inset of Fig.1 we plot both $\langle V_{dc}\rangle$ and $n_{va}/f$ vs $I_{ac}$ for $f$=$1/32$. We see that
148: $n_{va}$ increases monotonically and saturates to $10\%$ of $f$ at $I_{ac} \sim 0.8$. We find the same
149: behavior for all $f$ but the saturation value of $n_{va}$ decreases with increasing $f$, being less than
150: $0.01f$ for $f>1/8$. We conclude that the effect of pairs is almost negligible in the CR regime, but it
151: is relevant for diluted vortex lattices at large applied currents and they must be considered to
152: reproduce properly the experimental rectification tails.
153: \begin{figure}
154: \centerline{\includegraphics*[width=7.2cm]{f2.eps}}
155: %\centerline{\includegraphics*[width=7.2cm]{../f2/f2.pdf}}
156: \caption{
157: (a) $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$ vs $I_{ac}$ for $f$=$1/4$ and $f$=3/4. (b) Numerical $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$ contour plots in $I_{ac}-f$ plane
158: at $T$=$0.05E_J/k_B$ and
159: $\omega_{ac}$=$10^{-4}(1/\tau_J)$. Red dotted
160: lines represent $\langle V_{dc}\rangle < -V_0$ and green solid lines, $\langle V_{dc}
161: \rangle > V_0$=$5.10^{-5} R_NI_0$.
162: (c)
163: Experimental contours at T$=$3.8K, $\omega_{ac}$=$1 kHz$ and $V_0$=$15 nV$ (see \cite{pastoriza}).
164: }
165: \label{fig:cont}
166: \end{figure}
167:
168: A summary of our numerical results on voltage rectification vs vortex density is presented in
169: Fig.\ref{fig:cont} in comparison with experiments \cite{pastoriza}. In Fig.\ref{fig:cont}(a) we show
170: numerical curves for $f$=$1/4$ and $f$=1$-f$=3/4. From the symmetries of the frustrated XY Hamiltonian:
171: ${\cal H}(f)$=${\cal H}(-f)$=${\cal H}(1-f)$ \cite{tink}, we expect symmetrical transport properties around
172: $f$=$1/2$. Since vortex and antivortex motion is rectified in the same direction we have $\langle
173: V_{dc} \rangle(f)$=$-\langle V_{dc} \rangle$(1$-f$). This means that in the 0 $\leq f \leq$ 1/2 range of
174: magnetic field the dissipation arises from the motion of ``positive'' vortices while the flux of
175: ``negative'' vortices (antivortices) yields dissipation in the 1/2 $\leq$ $f$ $\leq$ 1 range. In
176: Fig.\ref{fig:cont}(b) contour plots of $\langle V_{dc}\rangle$ show the occurrence of voltage
177: rectification in the $I_{ac}-f$ plane. Current reversals occur only in the regime of strong vortex
178: repulsion around $f$=$1/2$, in a single interval, $0.17 \lesssim f < 0.5$. Comparing
179: Fig.\ref{fig:cont}(b-c) we see a good qualitative agreement with experiments.
180: \begin{figure}
181: \centerline{\includegraphics*[width=8.0cm]{f3.eps}}
182: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{../f3/f3.pdf}}
183: \caption{ Rectification dependences for $f$=$1/8$: (a){\it On $\omega_{ac}$:}
184: at $I_{ac}$=$0.25 (\star)$ and
185: $I_{ac}$=$0.75 (\diamond)$ ($\langle V_{dc} \rangle_{max}$ , see Fig.1). (b){\it On pinning potential:} $\langle V_{dc}\rangle$-$I_{ac}$
186: vs $\Delta I_0$. Inset: $\langle V_{dc}\rangle_{max}$ vs $\Delta I_0$. }
187: \label{fig:vs}
188: \end{figure}
189:
190: For applications it is also important
191: to accurately determine the range of parameters where rectification would be observable.
192: In Fig.\ref{fig:vs}(a) we see a well defined saturation plateau for $\langle V_{dc}\rangle$
193: at low frequencies. At high $\omega_{ac}$ the fast changes in
194: the potential slope do not allow vortices to adapt to the ratchet potential
195: during a cycle. For all $I_{ac}$ the mean voltage thus
196: decays, becoming negligible at
197: $\omega_{ac}$$\gtrsim$0.01$q(\tau_J)^{-1}$$\sim$1$/\tau_{rel}$.
198: %, where $\tau_{rel}$ is of the same order than the typical voltage relaxation time in the steady state.
199: Then we predict
200: an observable rectification up to $\sim$100kHz
201: in good agreement with \cite{pastoriza}, if we use typical parameters, $R_N$=$0.01 \Omega$ and $I_0$=$1 \mu A$,
202: to estimate our unit of frequency $(\tau_J)^{-1}\sim$30MHz.
203: Rectifica\-tion can also depend on the parameters
204: of the ratchet potential. In Fig.\ref{fig:vs}(b) we see that $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$ monotonically increase with $\Delta I_0$ for all $I_{ac}$, and the optimal rectification increase approximatively linearly for $1.5 \lesssim \Delta I_0 \lesssim 2$ (see inset) and for $ \Delta I_0 \sim 2$ inversion disappears \cite{fut}. We thus see that the ratchet effect could be experimentally improved up to one order of magnitude by modulating accordingly the Josephson couplings.
205: On the other hand we find that rectification has no appreciable changes for the experimental values $p$=7,10,15 nor sharp commensurability effects between $f$ and $p$.
206: We also analyze the range of temperature where rectification occurs and size effects.
207: We find a wide range of applicability, $0 \le T \lesssim 0.4$, what makes
208: JJA advantageous and that the main characteristics of our results are almost size independent for $L\,>\,32$ \cite{fut}.
209:
210:
211: In order to understand collective transport effects and in particular {\it current reversal}, we study vortex structures and spatial and temporal correlations.
212: In Fig.\ref{fig:sf}(a-b) we show vorticity snapshots for $f$=$1/8,3/4$ at $I_{ac}=0$ illustrating the competition between the ratchet potential, which induces a modulated vortex density, and the repulsive vortex-vortex interaction that favors a uniform vortex density. For all $f$ we find that vortices organize in dense vortex walls strongly pinned at the sawtooth minima. Interestingly, when CR starts, the static vortex structure present an averaged number of vortices in the walls similar to a checkerboard pattern, i.e. $\langle n_{v/wall}\rangle$$\sim$$L_y/2$.
213: The degree of periodic order is reflected by the intensity of the peaks
214: at ${\bf k}$=$(n 2\pi/p, 0)$ of the averaged vortex structure factor
215: $S({\bf k})$=$\left\langle\left|\frac{1}{L^2}\sum_{\bf \tilde n}
216: b({\bf \tilde n})\exp(i{\bf k}\cdot{\bf \tilde n})\right|^2\right\rangle$
217: shown in Fig.\ref{fig:sf}(c). A ring appears around the central peak
218: representing the disordered structure observed in the inter-wall region, inside which the vortex density becomes more uniform as $f$ approaches $f$=$1/2$ (compare $\langle n_{v/c}\rangle$ in (a) vs (b)).
219: When the system is driven the ratchet induced periodicity survives but its amplitude decays with increasing $I_{ac}$. We find that
220: the degree of order decreases considerably for $f$ around $f$=$1/2$ in the CR regime, although vortex walls at small $I_{ac}$ are still well defined, see Fig.\ref{fig:sf}(d).
221: \begin{figure}
222: \centerline{\includegraphics*[height=7.cm]{f4.eps}}
223: %\centerline{\includegraphics*[height=7.cm]{../f4/f4.pdf}}
224: \caption{Vortex structures: static $b({\bf \tilde n}$) obtained quenching
225: from high $T$
226: towards $T$=$0$ ($L$=$128$ but a fraction is
227: shown for transparency. Vortices are white plaquettes). In (a) $f$=$1/8$ and (b) $f$=$3/4$, both with $\langle n_{v/c}\rangle$ below, the number of
228: vortices per column. (c)
229: $S(\bf { k } )/\it{f}^2$ corresponding to $b({\bf\tilde{n}})$ in (a) with clear peaks due to the ratchet potential, as $k_1$.
230: (d) $S(k_1)/f^2$ vs $I_{ac}$ for $f$=$1/8, 3/4$ at
231: $T$=$0.05$ and $\omega_{ac}$=$10^{-4}$.
232: }
233: \label{fig:sf}
234: \end{figure}
235: We now analyze the instantaneous vortex dynamics.
236: \begin{figure}
237: \centerline{\includegraphics*[width=7.5cm]{f5.eps}}
238: %\centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{../f5/f5.pdf}}
239: \caption{Time voltage response to an ac-drive of $I_{ac}$=0.3 for $f$=$3/4$
240: (smaller amplitude curve, black line), with
241: $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$$>$0, and $I_{ac}$=0.7 (larger amplitude, red line), with $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$$<$0. Insets (a),(b): instantaneous vorticity for $I_{ac}$=0.3 and $t/\tau_{ac}$=$0, 0.25$ respectively.
242: (c) Power spectrum for $f$=3/4 (solid black line),
243: $f$=$1/8$ (dotted green line) and $f$=$1/16$ (dashed red line).
244: }
245: \label{fig:dyn}
246: \end{figure}
247: In Fig.\ref{fig:dyn} we show examples of typical voltage response vs time during a period at which its steady value $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$ (see Fig.\ref{fig:cont}(a)) is already achieved. The amplitude of the almost symmetrical temporal oscillations
248: around $V_{t}$=0 is much larger, one order of magnitude, than $\langle V_{dc} \rangle$ for all $I_{ac}$. This implies that rectification arises from tiny differences between the two directions of motion
249: and explains the low efficiency of the device and the need of very large $\tau_{ac}$=$\omega_{ac}^{-1}$ to resolve the effect. The dc-limit analysis confirms this result \cite{fut}.
250: Insets (a),(b) in Fig.\ref{fig:dyn} show $b({\bf \tilde n})$ snapshots at time [0,0.25]$\tau_{ac}$ respectively. Most of the time the moving vortex lattice is highly disordered
251: (as seen at $t/\tau_{ac}$=$0.25$), except for small forces close to depinning (as in $t/\tau_{ac}$$\sim$0)
252: %$\equiv$$t/\tau_{ac}$$\sim$0.5)
253: where the ratchet-induced periodicity is more visible.
254: This fluctuating order produces the small peaks in the averaged structure factor showed in Fig.\ref{fig:sf}(d).
255: In Fig.\ref{fig:dyn}(c) voltage power spectrum for different vortex densities are analyzed. Time correlations appear clearly at $\omega_{ac}$ and higher harmonics, as it is expected for one particle in a ratchet potential. Note however that interactions modify the harmonics structure, as it is seen comparing $f$=3/4 with more diluted vortex lattices, $f$=$1/8$ and $f$=$1/16$ where more harmonic peaks appear. We thus see that temporal order is only determined by the ac-drive as it is expected for vortices moving incoherently. No trace of a washboard frequency is observed for any $f$ nor $I_{ac}$. Therefore no dynamical phase transitions are induced by the ac-drive and the system behaves as a modulated driven plasma.
256:
257: {\it Discussion}.
258: Our results present some similarities but also some marked differences with other 2D vortex ratchet systems. First, let us note that inverted rectification appears {\it only at low drives within a single range of high $f$ around $f$=1/2} (Fig.\ref{fig:cont}). This is similar to CR observed in arrays of dots in SC films by Villegas {\it et al.} \cite{films}, but their explanation based on interstitial vortices moving over an inverted ratchet potential, is not suitable for JJA as interstitial can not be defined. Our results are also different to the multiple CRs observed and explained by de Souza Silva {\it et al.} in SC films with antidots arrays \cite{films}. The differences can be attributed to the strong pinning generated by dots or antidots, which can localize a few vortices in very small regions and produce a very coherent individual motion. In our case an extended weak potential pins and deforms collectively the vortex density although individual vortex motion remains highly incoherent. In addition, underdamped dynamics was also shown to provide CR \cite{films}. In our case no evidence of an effective dynamically induced
259: inertia is found however, as no hysteresis in Fig.\ref{fig:ivs}, nor out of phase voltage response is observed, Fig.\ref{fig:dyn}.
260: CR in JJA thus presents novel features deserving discussion.
261:
262: Since CR is observed near the onset of dissipation, an analysis of the asymmetric depinning is useful.
263: In the absence of vortex interactions it is clear that the critical current in the easy direction of the ratchet potential, $I_{dep}^{easy} \sim\Delta U/ (p-1)$ is smaller than the one in the hard direction
264: $I_{dep}^{hard} \sim\Delta U$. Therefore the onset of rectifica\-tion occurs when $I_{ac} \sim I_{dep}^{easy}$ with a net motion in the easy direction. In presence of interactions the situation can be rather different \cite{films}, since vortices tend to screen the ratchet potential thus modifying the critical currents and mobility of single vortex excitations in each direction differently. It is clear that a small tilt of the ratchet poten\-tial in the hard direction produces well defined walls with a high vortex density at the local minima of the sawtooth. On the contrary a tilt in the easy direction favors a smoother vortex density profile.
265: Calculating the force exerted on a vortex by a periodic array of vortex walls we can easily show that
266: $I_{dep}^{hard}$ is reduced by an amount proportional to the vortex density at the walls, $\tilde{I}_{dep}^{hard}$=$\Delta U - \alpha f_{wall}$, while in the easy direction ${I}_{dep}^{easy}$ remains unchanged.
267: Hence, CR can occur above a critical vortex density, $f_c$, such that $\tilde{I}_{dep}^{hard}$=$ {I}_{dep}^{easy}$ at $f_c$, yielding $f_c \sim \frac{\Delta U}{\alpha} ( \frac{p-2}{p-1})$. This simple argument is consistent with the fact that inversion is observed at high $f$, disappears with increasing $\Delta U$ and is weakly dependent on $p$ (details and dc limit confirming this scenario in \cite{fut}).
268: At larger $I_{ac}$ the dynamical smoothening
269: of the vortex density reduces the screening and the easy direction for rectification is recovered. Fig.\ref{fig:ivs} shows that this recovering occurs at higher $I_{ac}$ for higher $f$, consistent with the existence of denser walls at high $f$.
270: Our results thus show that vortex-vortex interactions can overscreen the asymmetry of the ratchet potential as was noted in \cite{films}
271: but the mechanism is {\it purely collective}, since individual\- vortex motion is highly incoherent like in a driven modulated fluid. Indeed, this effect could be relevant for a wide family of interacting many-body ratchet systems \cite{fut}.
272:
273: I acknowledge useful discussions with P. Martinoli, A.B. Kolton, D. Dom\'{\i}nguez, D.E
274: Shal\'om (also for providing experimental data), H. Pastoriza and H. Beck. This work was supported by the Swiss NSF.
275:
276: %====================================================================
277: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
278:
279: \bibitem{julicher} F. J\"{u}licher {\it et al.}, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 69}, 1269, 1997.
280:
281:
282: \bibitem{reimann} P. Reimann, Phys. Rep., {\bf 361}, 57, 2002.
283: \bibitem{menon} G. I. Menon, Phys. A, {\bf 96}, 372 (2006).
284:
285: \bibitem{astumian} R. D. Astumian and P. H\"{a}nggi, P.Today {\bf 55}, 33 (2002).
286:
287: \bibitem{linke} H. Linke, Appl. Phys. A, {\bf 75}, 167 (2002).
288:
289: \bibitem{barabasi99} C. S. Lee {\it et al.}, Nature {\bf 400}, 337 (1999).
290:
291: \bibitem{films} J.E. Villegas {\it et al.}, Science {\bf 302}, 1188 (2003); C.C. de Souza Silva {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 73}, 014507 (2006), {\it ibid} Nature {\bf440}, 651 (2006) and references therein.
292:
293: \bibitem{cole} D. Cole {\it et al.}, Nature Materials {\bf 5}, 305 (2006).
294:
295: \bibitem{sols} I. Zapata {\it et al.} Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 2292 (1996).
296:
297: \bibitem{falo} F. Falo {\it et al.}, Europhys. Lett. {\bf45}, 700 (1999).
298:
299: \bibitem{trias} E. Tr\'{\i }as {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 61}, 2257 (2000).
300:
301: \bibitem{goldobin} M. Beck {\it et al.} Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95}, 090603 (2005).
302:
303: \bibitem{majer} J.B. Majer {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett.
304: {\bf 90}, 056802 (2003).
305:
306: \bibitem{tink} See M. Tinkham, {\it Introduction to Superconductivity}, Mc.Graw Hill Inc. NY 1996; R.S. Newrock {\it et al.}, Sol. State Phys., {\bf 54},
307: 283, 2000; and references therein.
308: \bibitem{pastoriza} D.E. Shal\'om and H. Pastoriza, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
309: 177001 (2005).
310:
311: \bibitem{dyna} K.\ K.\ Mon and S.\ Teitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 62}, 673 (1989),
312: J.\ S.\ Chung\ {\it et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.B \ {\bf 40}, 6570 (1989).
313:
314: \bibitem{prb2} V.I.\ Marconi, D.\ Dom\'{\i }nguez, Phys.Rev.B {\bf 63}, 174509
315: (2001).
316:
317: \bibitem{ijja} D. Dom\'{\i }nguez, J.V.\ Jos\'e, Phys.Rev.B {\bf 53},
318: 11692 (1996).
319:
320:
321: \bibitem{fut}
322: V.I. Marconi {\it et al} [to be published].
323:
324: \end{thebibliography}
325:
326: \end{document}
327: