1: \documentstyle{article}
2: %\textwidth=16cm
3: %\textheight=24cm
4: %\hoffset=0.5cm
5: %\voffset=-1cm
6: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}
7: \begin{document}
8: \author{V.~Ya.~Demikhovskii and A.~A.~Perov}
9: \title{Hall Conductance of a Two-Dimensional Electron Gas with Spin-Orbit
10: Coupling at the Presence of Lateral Periodic Potential}
11: \maketitle
12:
13: \vspace{0.5cm}
14:
15: Nizhny Novgorod State University, Gagarin ave., 23, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia
16:
17: \vspace{0.5cm}
18: \begin{abstract}
19: We evaluate the distribution of Hall conductances in magnetic subbands
20: of two-dimensional electron gas with Rashba spin-orbit (SO) coupling
21: placed in a periodic potential and perpendicular magnetic field. In this
22: semiconductor structure the spin-orbit coupling mixes the states of different
23: magnetic subbands and changes the distribution of their Hall conductances
24: in comparison with the case of spinless particles. The calculations were
25: made for semiconductor structures with a weak ($AlGaAs/GaAs$) and
26: relatively strong ($GaAs/InGaAs$) SO and Zeeman interactions. The Hall
27: conductances of fully occupied magnetic subbands depend on the system
28: parameters and can be changed when neighboring subbands touch each other.
29: It was shown that in the real semiconductor structures with relatively
30: strong SO coupling the distribution of Hall conductance differs from
31: the quantization law predicted by Thouless et al\cite{Thoul} for systems without
32: spin-orbit coupling. In the case of weak SO interaction and relatively large
33: lattice period the Hall conductance of magnetic subbands are the same as
34: for spinless particles, but as the lattice period decreases and two neighboring
35: subbands touch each other the distribution of Hall conductances is changed
36: drastically.
37: \end{abstract}
38:
39: \vspace{0.5cm}
40: {\bf PACS} :~~~~71.20.Nr, 71.70.Di, 71.70.Ej, 73.43.Cd
41:
42: \vspace{0.5cm}
43: \section{Introduction}
44: During last decade the intricate energy spectrum of two-dimensional electrons
45: subject to both periodic potential and a perpendicular magnetic field, has
46: been studied theoretically and experimentally\cite{{Sch},{KvK},{Geis}}. The first
47: experimental observation of the splitting of magnetic levels into subbands in
48: an $n$-type heterojunction at the presence of a surface superlattice was
49: observed for the first time in\cite{Sch}. The effects of magnetic subbands
50: formation have also been studied in\cite{{KvK},{Geis}}, where the
51: magnetotransport in the structures with a surface superlattice was
52: investigated. However, the analysis of the experimental results was based on
53: theoretical models which do not take into account the effects of an electron
54: spin-orbit coupling.
55:
56: In a profound paper by Thouless, Kohmoto, Nightingale and den Nijs\cite{Thoul}
57: an explicit formula for the Hall conductance of 2D noninteracting electrons in
58: a periodic potential was derived. As it was found in\cite{Thoul}, such a
59: system has integral values of the Hall conductance in units of $e^2/h$ if the
60: Fermi energy lies in a gap between magnetic subbands. This result has a
61: topological nature and, as it was mentioned in many works, does not depend on
62: the detailed structure of the potential\cite{Us}.
63:
64: The theoretical studies of the magnetotransport in 2D electron gas in the
65: presence of SO coupling demonstrate that in high magnetic field where
66: the integer quantum Hall effect is observed, a sufficiently strong Rashba
67: constant creates new plateau in the Hall resistivity and splits the SdH
68: peaks of $\rho_{xx}$\cite{Vas}. Later\cite{Shen} the spin Hall conductance of
69: 2D electron gas with Rashba SO coupling was calculated. In particular,
70: the resonance increase of spin Hall conductance was predicted when
71: two energy levels cross each other at the Fermi level.
72:
73: In our previous work\cite{DP} the Harper-Hofstadter problem for two-dimensional
74: SO coupled system subject to a periodic potential and perpendicular
75: magnetic field was investigated. We have analyzed analytically and
76: numerically the magnetic Bloch states of 2D electrons subject to both periodic
77: potential of a lateral superlattice and perpendicular magnetic field under the
78: conditions when the SO coupling and Zeeman term are taken into consideration.
79: Also, the spin density distribution in the elementary cell is obtained and the
80: average spin polarization in a state with given quasimomentum is calculated.
81:
82: In this paper we investigate the quantum Hall effect in 2D electron gas with
83: SO Rashba coupling arising from inversion asymmetry subject to both periodic
84: potential of a superlattice and a uniform perpendicular magnetic field. The
85: calculations were carried out for two semiconductor systems with weak and quite
86: strong SO interaction. The Zeeman effect for electrons was also taken into
87: account. As was established, the Hall conductance quantization rule depends on
88: the system parameters at fixed magnetic flux per unit cell of the superlattice
89: and changes at the moment when the neighboring magnetic subbands touch each
90: other. As we will see below, in the system with a weak SO coupling when the SO
91: and Zeeman splittings are smaller than Landau level splitting due to the
92: action of periodic potential the neighboring magnetic subbands are overlapped
93: but not degenerated for any quasimomentum ${\bf k}$. In that case the Hall
94: conductance quantization rule is the same as for spinless
95: particles\cite{Thoul}. We found that with the decreasing superlattice period
96: the effect of SO coupling rises and the distribution of Hall conductances
97: in magnetic subbands is changed at the moment when neighboring subbands touch
98: each other. In semiconductor structures where SO coupling as well as Zeeman
99: splitting are larger than the splitting by periodic potential, we found a new
100: distribution law for Hall currents of fully occupied magnetic subbands.
101:
102: All calculations performed in this paper have been made without taking into
103: account the potential disorder. We assume that, just as in the absence of the
104: spin-orbit coupling, the presence of disorder gives rise to localization of
105: quantum states. So, the extended states in neighboring Landau levels are
106: separated in energy by localized states.
107:
108: The paper is organized as follows. Section II is devoted to the calculations
109: of energy spectrum and spinor Bloch wave functions of an electron in two realistic
110: semiconductor superlattice structures placed in uniform magnetic field. The
111: position of Landau subbands versus the magnetic field and dispersion laws
112: when the number of magnetic flux quanta per unit cell of the superlattice
113: is equal to three flux quanta are evaluated for these semiconductor systems
114: with different strengths of Rashba and Zeeman interactions. In Section III
115: we analyse the structure of Berry curvatures which are defined in the magnetic
116: Brillouin zone (MBZ) and discuss the numerical results for Hall conductance
117: distributions for both cases of weak and strong SO coupling.
118:
119: \section{Quantum states}
120: We consider 2D electron gas with spin-orbit Rashba coupling in a potential
121: $V(x,y)$ which is periodic in plane with the period $a$, and in a uniform
122: magnetic field ${\bf H}$ perpendicular to the plane of the electrons. The
123: correspondent one-electron Hamiltonian has the following form:
124: $$
125: \hat H=\hat H_0 + V(x,y),\eqno(1)
126: $$
127: where $V(x,y)=V(x+na,y+ma)$,
128: $$
129: \hat H_0=({\bf\hat p}-e{\bf A}/c)^2/2m^{\ast}+\hat H_R-g\mu_B H\hat\sigma_z,
130: $$
131: $$
132: \hat H_R=\frac{\alpha}{\hbar}\bigg(\hat\sigma_x (\hat p_y-eA_y/c)-
133: \hat\sigma_y\hat p_x\bigg)
134: $$
135: is the Rashba Hamiltonian of an electron in uniform magnetic field. Here
136: $\hat p_{x,y}$ are the momentum operator components, $m^{\ast}$ is the
137: electron effective mass, $\hat\sigma_i\, (i=x,y)$ are the Pauli matrices,
138: $\alpha$ is the parameter of the SO coupling, $g$ is the Zeeman factor, and
139: $\mu_B$ is the Bohr magneton. We use the Landau gauge in which the vector
140: potential has the form ${\bf A}=(0,Hx,0)$ and consider the potential
141: $V(x,y)=V_0(\cos(2\pi x/a)+\cos(2\pi y/a))$. The quantum states structure of
142: the system under consideration depends crucially on the parameter
143: $\Phi/\Phi_0=p/q=|e|Ha^2/2\pi hc$ ($p$ and $q$ are prime integers) which
144: is the number of flux quanta per unit cell, and $\Phi_0$ is the flux quanta.
145:
146: One can express the eigenfunction of Hamiltonian (1) as a set of Landau wave
147: functions in the presence of the SO coupling. If we take $p/q$ to be the
148: rational number, the two-component magnetic Bloch function, analogous to the
149: one-component magnetic Bloch function of the $\mu$th magnetic subband, can be
150: written in the form
151: $$
152: \displaylines{\Psi_{{\bf k},\mu}(x,y)=\pmatrix{\Psi_{1{\bf k},\mu}(x,y)\cr
153: \Psi_{2{\bf k},\mu}(x,y)}=\sum\limits_{n=1}^{p}
154: \sum\limits_{\ell=-\infty}^{+\infty}{\rm e}^{ik_x(\ell qa+nqa/p)}
155: {\rm e}^{2\pi iy(\ell p+n)/a}\times\cr
156: \hfill\times\Bigg[A_{0n}^{\mu}({\bf k})\psi_{0n\ell {\bf k}}^{+}(x,y)+
157: \sum\limits_{S=1}^{\infty}\{ A_{Sn}^{\mu}({\bf k})\psi_{Sn\ell
158: {\bf k}}^{+}(x,y)+B_{Sn}^{\mu}({\bf k})\psi_{S,n\ell {\bf k}}^{-}(x,y)\}
159: \Bigg],\hfill\llap{(2)}\cr}
160: $$
161: where the spinors $\psi_{0n\ell {\bf k}}^{+}=\exp(ik_yy)\pmatrix{0\cr
162: \phi_0[\xi_{\ell n}]}$, $\psi_{Sn\ell {\bf k}}^{+}=\frac{\exp(ik_yy)}
163: {\sqrt{1+D_S^2}}\pmatrix{D_S\phi_{S-1}[\xi_{\ell n}]\cr
164: \phi_S[\xi_{\ell n}]}$ and $\psi_{Sn\ell {\bf k}}^{-}=\frac{\exp(ik_yy)}
165: {\sqrt{1+D_S^2}}\pmatrix{\phi_{S-1}[\xi_{\ell n}]\cr
166: -D_S\phi_S[\xi_{\ell n}]}$ correspond to "$+$" and "$-$" branches of the
167: spectrum of the Hamiltonian $\hat H_0$\cite{Vas}. Here,
168: $D_S=(\sqrt{2S}\alpha/l_H)/(E_0^++\sqrt{(E_0^+)^2+2S\alpha^2/l_H^2})$,
169: $\phi_S[\xi]$ are the simple harmonic oscillator functions,
170: $l_H=c\hbar/|e|H$ is the magnetic length, $E_0^+=\hbar\omega_c/2+g\mu_BH$
171: and $\omega_c=|e|H/m^{\ast}c$ is the cyclotron frequency. Here quantum numbers
172: $S=1,2,3,\ldots$ characterize the pair of "$+$" and "$-$" states
173: $E_S^{\pm}=S\hbar\omega_c\pm\sqrt{(E_0^+)^2+2S\alpha^2/l_H^2}$ of the
174: unperturbed Hamiltonian $\hat H_0$, $\xi_{\ell n}=(x-x_0-\ell qa-nqa/p)/l_H$,
175: $x_0=c\hbar k_y/|e|H$.
176:
177: Note that the spinor wave function (2) is the eigenfunction of both the
178: Hamiltonian (1) and the operator of magnetic translation and therefore it has
179: to obey the following Bloch-Peierls conditions
180: $$
181: \Psi_{{\bf k},\mu}(x+qa,y+a)=\Psi_{{\bf k},\mu}(x,y)\exp(ik_xqa)\exp(ik_ya)
182: \exp(2\pi iy/a),
183: $$
184: where ${\bf k}$ is the quasimomentum defined in the MBZ
185: $$
186: -\pi/qa\le k_x\le\pi/qa,\quad -\pi/a\le k_y\le\pi/a.
187: $$
188: So, here the magnetic Brillouin zone is the same as for the charged spinless
189: particle. In the limit of high magnetic fields the functions
190: $\psi_{Sn\ell {\bf k}}^+$ and $\psi_{Sn\ell {\bf k}}^-$ are proportional to
191: eigenspinors of Pauli operator $\hat\sigma_z$: $\pmatrix{1\cr 0}$ and
192: $\pmatrix{0\cr 1}$.
193:
194: Substituting Eq.(2) in the Schr\"odinger equation $\hat H\Psi=E\Psi$ we come
195: to the infinite system of linear equations for coefficients
196: $A_{Sn}^{\mu}({\bf k})$ and $B_{Sn}^{\mu}({\bf k})$. In the case when periodic
197: potential amplitude and spin-orbit coupling energy have the same order and the
198: inequality $\Delta E_{SO}\simeq V_0\le \hbar\omega_c$ takes place the system of
199: linear equations can be reduced to the system of infinite number of uncoupled
200: groups of $2p$ equations. Each group describes the magnetic Bloch states formed
201: from the states with energies $E_S^+$ and $E_{S+1}^-$ of the single Landau
202: level split by SO interaction. The structure of the Hamiltonian matrix as well
203: as the matrix elements have been discussed in details in our previous
204: paper\cite{DP}. It was demonstrated that SO interaction mixes the states of
205: pure Landau levels and results in a doubling of the number of the magnetic
206: subbands formed under the fixed value $p/q$ of magnetic flux quanta per unit
207: cell.
208:
209: The experimental values of Rashba coupling constant $\alpha$ for different
210: materials range from about $2\cdot 10^{-12}\, {\rm eV}\cdot {\rm m}$ to
211: $4\cdot 10^{-11}\, {\rm eV}\cdot {\rm m}$.
212: The calculations of quantum states were carried out for two semiconductor
213: structures with different strength of SO coupling. One of them is 2D
214: electron gas in $AlGaAs/GaAs$ heterojunction with superlattice periodic
215: potential. This structure is characterized by small SO Rashba constant $\alpha$
216: and relatively small $g$-factor. The parameters of another system correspond
217: to $GaAs/In_x Ga_{1-x} As$ heterostructure where SO coupling parameter and
218: $g$-factor have large values.
219:
220: We have calculated the position of magnetic subbands at different $p/q$ as
221: well as the dispersion laws $E_{\mu}({\bf k})$ in magnetic Brillouin zone.
222: In Figs.1a, 1b the distribution of magnetic subbands versus the
223: number of magnetic flux quanta per unit cell $p/q$ is presented. The spectrum
224: shown in Fig.1a corresponds to the parameters of $AlGaAs/GaAs$ structure,
225: and magnetic subbands in $GaAs/In_x Ga_{1-x} As$ system are presented in
226: Fig.1b. The magnetic subbands split off the four lowest Landau levels are
227: shown in both cases. The arrows mark the position of energy bands for the
228: value $p/q=3/1$ at which the calculations of Hall conductance were carried
229: out (see below).
230:
231: %\begin{figure}[t]
232: %\leavevmode
233: %\centering{\epsfig{file=Fig1.eps,width=10cm}}
234: %\caption{The magnetic subband distributions versus the number of magnetic
235: %flux quanta for: (a) - $AlGaAs/GaAs$ structure with parameters $m^{\ast}=
236: %0.067\, m_0$, $\alpha=2.5\cdot 10^{-12}\,{\rm eV\cdot m}$, $g=-0.44$,
237: %$a=80\, {\rm nm}$, $V_0=1\, {\rm meV}$; (b) - $GaAs/In_{0.23}Ga_{0.77} As$
238: %structure with parameters $m^{\ast}= 0.05\, m_0$, $\alpha=2.5\cdot 10^{-11}\,
239: %{\rm eV\cdot m}$, $g=-4.0$, $a=80\, {\rm nm}$, $V_0=1\, {\rm meV}$.}
240: %\end{figure}
241:
242: The dispersion laws $E_{\mu}({\bf k})$ in MBZ are presented in Fig.2a,
243: 2b for $p/q=3/1$ for parameters $AlGaAs/GaAs$ and $GaAs/In_{0.23}Ga_{0.77}As$
244: structures, respectively. Here and below we consider the magnetic subbands
245: attached to the lowest pair of unperturbed levels $E_0^+$ and $E_1^-$.
246: The system parameters here are the same as in Fig1. The positions of these
247: six ($2p$) subbands are pointed out by arrows at Fig.1a, 1b. As one can see
248: from Fig.1a and Fig.2a the Landau level is split off into magnetic subbands
249: due to the periodic potential of the lattice. The splitting caused by the SO
250: coupling and Zeeman effect is quite small because of the small Rashba constant
251: and Lande $g$-factor in the $GaAs$. Thus, the spin degeneracy of an electron
252: vanishes and three pairs of overlapped magnetic minibands are formed
253: (see Fig.2a). So, in Fig.1a these six subbands are visible as three bands. It
254: should be noted, that the ratio of the SO and Zeeman splittings to the level
255: broadening produced by a periodic potential essentially depends on the lattice
256: period $a$. We calculated also the energy spectrum consisting of six magnetic
257: subbands ($p/q=3/1$) for the system $AlGaAs/GaAs$ with superlattice periods
258: $a<80\, {\rm nm}$. It was observed that with the decreasing superlattice period
259: all magnetic subbands become not overlapped. Note also, that at the period
260: $a\simeq 56\, {\rm nm}$ the second and the third subbands touch each other and
261: after that all subbands are separated by gaps again. As we will see below
262: such a reconstruction of energy spectrum leads to the changing of Hall
263: conductance quantization laws in fully occupied Landau subbands.
264:
265: In contrast, in $GaAs/In_{0.23}Ga_{0.77}As$ structure all of six magnetic
266: subbands are not overlapped due to the large SO interaction and Zeeman
267: splitting of the unperturbed discrete levels $E_0^+$ and $E_1^-$. As we will
268: see below, the existence of small energy gaps in the spectrum leads to the
269: specific shape of Berry curvature which defines the Hall conductance
270: quantization law of fully occupied magnetic subbands.
271:
272: %\begin{figure}[t]
273: %\leavevmode
274: %\centering{\epsfig{file=Fig2.eps,width=10cm}}
275: %\caption{The dispersion laws in magnetic subbands at $p/q=3/1$ for the
276: %parameters indicated in Fig.1: (a) - three pairs of overlapped subbands for
277: %$AlGaAs/GaAs$ superlattice structure, (b) - six separated magnetic subbands in
278: %$GaAs/InGaAs$ superlattice structure. These magnetic subbands are marked in
279: %Figs.1a, 1b by arrows.}
280: %\end{figure}
281:
282: \section {Hall conductance}
283: The quantum Hall effect in 2D periodic potential has a topological nature.
284: We have investigated the influence of the spin-orbit coupling on topological
285: invariants (first Chern numbers) of magnetic subbands, which determine their
286: Hall conductance.
287:
288: When a small electric field is applied, a resulting current in the
289: perpendicular direction to applied electric field may be given by Kubo formula.
290: So, the resulting Hall conductance of the occupied magnetic subbands can
291: be written as
292: $$
293: \sigma_{xy}=-ie^2\hbar\sum\limits_{E_\nu({\bf k})<E_F<E_\mu({\bf k})}
294: \frac{(v_y)_{\nu{\bf k},\mu{\bf k}}(v_x)_{\mu{\bf k},\nu{\bf k}}-
295: (v_x)_{\nu{\bf k},\mu{\bf k}}(v_y)_{\mu{\bf k},\nu{\bf k}}}
296: {(E_\nu({\bf k})-E_\mu({\bf k}))^2},\eqno(3)
297: $$
298: where $E_F$ is a Fermi energy and the summation implies the sum over all the
299: states below and above the Fermi level. The indices $\nu$ and $\mu$ label
300: magnetic subbands. At the presence of SO coupling the components of velocity
301: operator in $x$ and $y$ directions $v_x$ and $v_y$ are defined by the
302: expressions:
303: $$
304: v_x=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_x}=
305: \pmatrix{-i\hbar\nabla_x/m^\ast & i\alpha/\hbar \cr
306: -i\alpha/\hbar & -i\hbar\nabla_x/m^\ast}\eqno(4.a)
307: $$
308: $$
309: v_y=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_y}=
310: \pmatrix{-i\hbar\nabla_y/m^\ast-\omega_cx & \alpha/\hbar \cr
311: \alpha/\hbar & -i\hbar\nabla_y/m^\ast-\omega_cx}.\eqno(4.b)
312: $$
313:
314: Using Eq.(3) after simple transformations one can write the Hall
315: conductance of the $\mu$th fully occupied magnetic subband in the following
316: form\cite{{Us},{CN}}:
317: $$
318: \sigma_{xy}^{\mu}=\frac{e^2}{2\pi h}\int\Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})\, d^2{\bf k}=
319: \frac{e^2}{\hbar}\int \bigg[-l_H^2+\Omega_{\mu}^{(1)}({\bf k})\bigg]\,
320: d^2{\bf k}.\eqno(5)
321: $$
322: In the representation of the Hamiltonian $\hat H_0$ the following expression
323: for $\Omega_{\mu}^{(1)}({\bf k})$ takes place:
324: $$
325: \Omega_{\mu}^{(1)}({\bf k})=i\sum\limits_{\nu\ne\mu}\Bigg[
326: \frac{\bigg(\sum\limits_{mm^\prime}d_m^{\mu\ast}({\bf k})
327: d_{m^\prime}^{\nu}({\bf k})\frac{\partial H_{mm^\prime}}{\partial k_x}\bigg)
328: \cdot
329: \bigg(\sum\limits_{ll^\prime}d_{l^\prime}^{\nu\ast}({\bf k})
330: d_l^{\mu}({\bf k})\frac{\partial H_{l^\prime l}}{\partial k_y}\bigg)}
331: {(E_\mu({\bf k})-E_\nu({\bf k}))^2}-{\rm c.c.}\Bigg].
332: \eqno(6)
333: $$
334: Here, the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian matrix $H_{mm^\prime}$ are defined
335: in our previous paper\cite{DP}. The coefficients $d_m({\bf k})$ are the
336: eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian matrix
337: $H_{mm^\prime}$ ($m,m^\prime=1,\ldots,2p$), related to the coefficients
338: $A_{Sn}({\bf k})$ and $B_{Sn}({\bf k})$ in Eq.(2).
339:
340: In Eq.(5) the integration is over the occcupied states in the MBZ, and the
341: function $\Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})$ is the $z$-component of the Berry curvature
342: whose integral over an area bounded by a path $C$ in ${\bf k}$-space is the
343: Berry phase $\gamma_{\mu}(C)$\cite{Ber}.
344: The $z$-component of the Berry curvature is defined as usial by the
345: expression\cite{Thoul}
346: $$
347: \Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})=i\Bigg(\bigg<\frac{\partial u_{{\bf k},\mu}}{\partial k_x}
348: \frac{\partial u_{{\bf k},\mu}^{\ast}}{\partial k_y}\bigg>-c.c.\Bigg).\eqno(7)
349: $$
350: In our case $u_{{\bf k},\mu}(x,y)$ is the periodic part of spinor
351: magnetic Bloch function (2):
352: $u_{{\bf k},\mu}(x,y)=\Psi_{{\bf k},\mu}(x,y)\cdot\exp (-i{\bf k}{\bf r})$.
353: The first term in square brackets in Eq.(5) defines the "ideal" Hall
354: conductance of a single magnetic subband\cite{Us} equals $e^2/ph$.
355: At the same time due to Laughlin arguments\cite{La} each magnetic subband with
356: its extended states completely filled contribute whole multiple of $e^2/h$ to
357: the Hall conductance. So, the integral of $\Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})$ over one
358: magnetic Brillouin zone divided by $2\pi$ is always integer which is the
359: topological Chern number.
360:
361: The semiclassical dynamics of magnetic Bloch electrons was investigated by
362: Chang and Niu\cite{CN}. Using the magnetic Bloch states they derived the
363: semiclassical equations of electron motion and showed that the Berry curvature
364: of magnetic band plays a crucial role in the electron subband dynamics. Namely,
365: it gives electrons an extra velocity in the direction of
366: ${\bf E}\times {\bf H}$ and defines the Hall conductivity quantization law.
367: We have made a considerable use of these results\cite{CN}.
368:
369: The shapes of the functions $\Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})$ for
370: different magnetic subbands are displayed in Figs.3a, 3b for $AlGaAs/GaAs$ and
371: $GaAs/InGaAs$ structures, respectively. As one can see from the comparison
372: of Figs.2a, 2b and Figs.3a,3b the maxima of $\Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})$
373: are located in the ${\bf k}$-space along the lines where the gaps between
374: neighbor magnetic subbands are narrow.
375:
376: %\begin{figure}[t]
377: %\leavevmode
378: %\centering{\epsfig{file=Fig3.eps,width=10cm}}
379: %\caption{The Berry curvatures $\Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})$ (arb. units)
380: %for 2D electron gas in (a) -- $AlGaAs/GaAs$ and
381: %(b) -- $GaAs/In_{0.23}Ga_{0.77}As$ structures with lateral superlattice at
382: %$p/q=3/1$, $a=80\, {\rm nm}$ and $V_0=1\, {\rm meV}$. The parameters of the SO
383: %and Zeeman interactions are the same as in Fig.1. The subband indices
384: %$\mu=1,\ldots,6$ are displayed near each of the surfaces
385: %$\Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})$.}
386: %\end{figure}
387:
388: %\begin{figure}[t]
389: %\leavevmode
390: %\centering{\epsfig{file=Fig4.eps,width=10cm}}
391: %\caption{The Hall conductance quantization laws in six fully occupied magnetic
392: %subbands at $p/q=3/1$ for the same parameters as in Fig.1: (a) - for
393: %$AlGaAs/GaAs$ structure, (b) - for $GaAs/InGaAs$ structure.}
394: %\end{figure}
395:
396: The distribution of Hall conductance in magnetic subbands for $AlGaAs/GaAs$
397: and $GaAs/InGaAs$ superlattice structures is shown in Fig.4a and Fig4b,
398: respectively. Here the magnetic flux through the superlattice elementary cell
399: is equal to three flux quanta. In systems with weak SO coupling (see Fig.1a
400: and Fig.2a) when the SO and Zeeman terms are smaller than the Landau level
401: broadening produced by the periodic potential, a quant of the Hall current is
402: carried by the middle subband from each group of three subbands (Fig.4a). So,
403: the results of our calculations are in good agreement with
404: Thouless et al.\cite{Thoul} results that in a weak periodic potential and at
405: the absence of spin-orbit and Zeeman interactions only the central subband of
406: each Landau level carries the Hall current when $q=1,3,5,\ldots$. With the
407: decreasing superlattice period the distribution of Hall conductances of
408: magnetic subbands is changed drastically. As was mentioned above at the
409: critial value of the period $a=56\, {\rm nm}$ the second and the third subbands
410: contact each other and the dispersion laws $E_{\mu}({\bf k})$ ($\mu=2,3$) are
411: modified. At the same time the correspondent Berry curvatures
412: $\Omega_{\mu}({\bf k})$ and, therefore, the topological invariants (first
413: Chern numbers) of these subbands defining their Hall conductance are changed
414: dramatically. We found that in $AlGaAs/GaAs$ superlattice structure at
415: $p/q=3/1$, $a=50\, {\rm nm}$, $V_0=1\, {\rm meV}$, $g=-0.44$ and
416: $\alpha=2.5\cdot 10^{-12}\, {\rm eV\cdot m}$ the following sequence of Hall
417: conductances in units of $(-e^2/h)$ is realized: 0,2,-1,1,0,0. As a result,
418: in the system which is characterized by a weak Rashba and Zeeman coupling
419: constants at the certain lattice parameters the distribution of Hall
420: conductances can be totally different from another one distribution predicted
421: for spinless particles\cite{Thoul}.
422:
423: If the SO and Zeeman terms are comparable to
424: the Landau level broadening caused by the superlattice periodic potential, the
425: distribution of Hall conductance across six subbands measured in units of
426: $-e^2/h$ follows the same sequence as before: 0, 2, -1, 1, 0, 0 (see Fig.4b).
427: Correspondingly, the Hall current here is carried by the second, the third,
428: and the fourth magnetic subbands. Moreover, we observed that each time when
429: two bands touch each other while the SO or Zeeman coupling parameters are
430: varied, the conductances of these subbands may not be conserved when the bands
431: split again. However, the sum of the Hall conductances remains unchanged.
432:
433: \section{Conclusions}
434: To conclude, we have investigated the Hall conductance distributions in 2D
435: superlattice system with Rashba spin-orbit coupling at the presence of
436: perpendicular magnetic field. The electron spinor wave function is the
437: eigenfunction of both the Hamiltonian and operator of magnetic translation and
438: obeys the Bloch-Peierls conditions. The quantum states for the structures with
439: a weak and relatively strong SO and Zeeman interactions are evaluated. It was
440: demonstrated that in the case of weak SO interaction when the Landau level
441: broadening due to a periodic potential is large than Rashba and Zeeman terms,
442: the overlapped magnetic subbands are grouped into pairs. In the opposite case
443: all magnetic subbands are resolved and separated by energy gaps.
444:
445: The Hall conductances of magnetic subbands were obtained by integration of
446: the Berry curvatures over magnetic Brillouin zone. It was found that in real
447: semiconductor superlattice systems subject in uniform magnetic field at the
448: presence of spin-orbit coupling the distribution of Hall conductances in
449: magnetic subbands can differ from another one obtained by Thouless et
450: al\cite{Thoul} in the model of spinless particles. Even in the case of
451: relatively weak SO coupling and Zeeman term the distribution of Hall
452: conductances is changed with the decreasing lattice period.
453:
454:
455: \section*{Acknowlegment}
456: This work was supported by the program of the Russian Ministry of Education
457: and Science "Development of scientific potential of high education" (project
458: 2.1.1.2363), grant of Russian Foundation of Basic Research (no. 06-02-17189)
459: and grant of the President of Russian Federation (MK-5165.2006.2).
460:
461: \begin{thebibliography}{11}
462:
463: \bibitem{Thoul} D.J.~Thouless, M.~Kohmoto, M.P.~Nightingale et al., Phys. Rev.
464: Lett. {\bf 49}, 405 (1982).
465:
466: \bibitem{Sch} T.~Schlo\"sser, K.~Ensslin, J.P.~Kotthaus, et al., Semicond.
467: Sci. Technol. {\bf 11}, 1582 (1996).
468:
469: \bibitem{KvK} C.~Albrecht, J.H.~Smet, K.~von~Klitzing, et al., Phys. Rev.
470: Lett. {\bf 86}, 147 (2001); M.C.~Geisler, J.H.~Smet, V.~Umansky,
471: K.~von~Klitzing, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 256801 (2004).
472:
473: \bibitem{Geis} M.G.~Geisler, et al., Conference Workbook of the 15th
474: International Conference on Electronic Properties of Two-
475: Dimensional Systems, Nara, Japan, 2003, p. 149.
476:
477: \bibitem{Us} N.A.~Usov, Zh. Eksp. i Teor. Fiz. {\bf 94} iss. 12, 305 (1988)
478: [Sov. Phys.: JETP {\bf 67}, 2565 (1988)].
479:
480: \bibitem{Vas} X.F.~Wang and P.~Vasilopoulos, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 67}, 085313
481: (2003).
482:
483: \bibitem{Shen} S.-Q.~Shen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 256603-1 (2004).
484:
485: \bibitem{DP} V.Ya.~Demikhovskii and A.A.~Perov, Europhys. Lett. {\bf 76}
486: iss.3, 477 (2006).
487:
488: \bibitem{Ber} M.V.~Berry, Proc. Royal Soc. (London) A {\bf 392}, 45 (1984).
489:
490: \bibitem{La} R.B.~Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 23}, 5632 (1981).
491:
492: \bibitem{CN} Ming-Che Chang and Qian Niu, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 53}, 7010 (1996).
493: \end{thebibliography}
494: \end{document}
495: