1: \documentclass[prl,twocolumn,aps,superscriptaddress,showpacs,amsmath]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx,bm}
3: \begin{document}
4:
5:
6: \title{Interchain-Frustration-Induced Metallic State
7: in Quasi-One-Dimensional Mott Insulators}
8:
9:
10:
11: \author{M.\ Tsuchiizu}
12:
13: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Nagoya University,
14: Nagoya 464-8602, Japan}
15:
16: \author{Y.\ Suzumura}
17:
18: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Nagoya University,
19: Nagoya 464-8602, Japan}
20:
21: \author{C.\ Bourbonnais}
22:
23: \affiliation{D\'{e}partement de Physique, Universit\'{e} de Sherbrooke,
24: Sherbrooke, Qu\'{e}bec, Canada J1K-2R1}
25:
26:
27: \date{September 28, 2007}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30: The mechanism that drives a metal-insulator transition
31: in an undoped quasi-one-dimensional Mott insulator
32: is examined in the framework of the Hubbard model
33: with two different hoppings $t_{\perp1}$ and $t_{\perp2}$
34: between nearest-neighbor chains.
35: By applying an $N_\perp$-chain renormalization group method
36: at the two-loop level,
37: we show how a metallic state emerges
38: when both $t_{\perp1}$ and $t_{\perp2}$ exceed critical values.
39: In the metallic phase, the quasiparticle weight becomes finite
40: and develops a strong momentum dependence.
41: We discuss the temperature dependence of the resistivity
42: and the impact of our theory in the understanding
43: of recent experiments on half-filled molecular conductors.
44: \end{abstract}
45:
46: \pacs{71.10.Fd, 71.10.Pm, 71.30.+h}
47:
48: \maketitle
49:
50: The remarkable properties of
51: strongly correlated systems near a metal to Mott insulator (MI) transition
52: stand out as one of the richest parts of the physics of
53: strongly correlated systems \cite{Imada1998}.
54: This takes on particular importance in low dimensional materials at
55: half-filling, and especially in one dimension,
56: where spin and charge excitations are well known to be invariably
57: decoupled, an effect that receives experimental confirmation in
58: the one-dimensional (1D) oxide material
59: SrCuO$_2$ \cite{Kim2006}.
60: How this picture modifies when the hopping of electrons in more than
61: one spatial direction progressively grows
62: and a higher dimensional metallic ground state becomes possible
63: is a key issue that remains poorly understood.
64: This problem finds concrete applications in organic molecular
65: compounds, which constitute very close realizations
66: of 1D systems. This is the case notably of
67: (TTM-TTP)I$_3$ and (DMTSA)BF$_4$
68: which, as genuine half-filled band materials
69: due to the monovalent anions I$_3^-$ and BF$_4^-$,
70: see their Mott insulating state being gradually
71: suppressed under pressure \cite{Mori1997,Mori2004}.
72: Quite recently, resistivity measurements on
73: (TTM-TTP)I$_3$ at high pressure
74: revealed that the temperature scale for the Mott insulating behavior
75: is suppressed by an order of magnitude down to
76: $T_\mathrm{MI}\approx $ 20 K at $P =$ 8 GPa of pressure,
77: with a metallic ground state expected
78: to occur above 10 GPa \cite{Yasuzuka}.
79: It is the objective of this letter to propose a theoretical description
80: of this transition.
81:
82:
83:
84: Bosonization, renormalization group (RG) approaches to the 1D Hubbard
85: model in weak coupling and its exact solution from the Bethe ansatz
86: \cite{Dzyaloshinskii72,Bourbonnais2003,Giamarchi_book},
87: show that electron-electron umklapp-scattering processes
88: are a key ingredient that promotes the existence of a Mott
89: insulating ground state at half-filling.
90: The difficulty underlying the mechanism of the MI transition in the
91: quasi-1D case resides in the fact that the decoupling of spin and
92: charge excitations on the metallic side of the transition at higher
93: dimension
94: does not occur,
95: namely when Fermi-liquid quasiparticles excitations appear.
96: This issue has been addressed theoretically
97: by an RPA treatment of
98: interchain hopping \cite{Essler2002},
99: in which its feedback effect on
100: the Mott gap is neglected for the self-energy
101: of the one-particle Green's function.
102: The RPA results shows the existence of a Fermi-liquid metallic state
103: with electron and hole Fermi-surface pockets when the interchain
104: hopping exceeds a critical value.
105: The important role of
106: this feedback effect has been pointed out recently from the use of dynamical mean-field theory,
107: extended to include the influence of 1D fluctuations
108: (the chain-DMFT) \cite{Giamarchi2001}
109: -- an approach expected to be workable in the strong-coupling regime.
110: In the weak-coupling regime, however, the electron-electron umklapp scattering
111: and the characteristics of its coupling to nesting of the whole Fermi surface, play a key role
112: \cite{Dzyaloshinskii72,Bourbonnais2003,Giamarchi_book}, both for
113: the Mott insulating state and for the possibility of the MI transition
114: that emerges in the quasi-1D case.
115: Transverse dispersion
116: which has a tendency towards the realization of the
117: deconfined metallic states
118: \cite{Bourbonnais2003,Giamarchi_book,Giamarchi2001}
119: is in general overlooked in the calculation of one-particle Green's function from mean-field like approaches.
120: The two-loop RG approach avoids such an approximation and treats the Fermi-surface nesting conditions properly. These
121: can be strongly altered in the quasi-1D case,
122: especially in the presence of frustration
123: in the electron kinetics.
124:
125:
126:
127: In this Letter, we apply an $N_\perp$-chain RG approach
128: to quasi-1D half-filled system as developed recently at
129: the two-loop level \cite{Tsuchiizu2006,Tsuchiizu2006b}. The momentum
130: dependence for
131: nesting of the whole Fermi surface
132: and that for couplings, including umklapp scattering
133: \cite{Duprat2001,Doucot2003,Rohe06},
134: are taken into account in a systematic way
135: in the calculation of one-particle Green's function and four-point
136: vertices \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}.
137: The combined impact of correlations and nesting frustration
138: induced by interchain hopping on the transverse momentum dependence of the
139: quasiparticle weight is obtained in
140: weak-coupling regime.
141:
142:
143:
144: We consider the quasi-1D half-filled Hubbard model
145: on an anisotropic
146: triangular lattice [Fig.\ \ref{fig:model}(a)], with
147: the transfer energies
148: $t_\parallel \gg |t_{\perp 1}|,|t_{\perp 2}|$
149: ($t_\parallel$ is the energy along chains and
150: $t_{\perp1}$ and $t_{\perp2}$
151: are those between chains).
152: Our Hamiltonian, with the on site Coulomb repulsion $U$
153: is given by
154: %====================================================================
155: \begin{eqnarray}
156: H &=&
157: -t_\parallel \sum_{j,\ell,s}
158: \left(c_{j,\ell,s}^\dagger c_{j+1,\ell,s}^{}+\mathrm{H.c.} \right)
159: \nonumber \\ && {}
160: -t_{\perp 1} \sum_{j,\ell,s}
161: \left(c_{j,\ell,s}^\dagger c_{j,\ell+1,s}^{}+\mathrm{H.c.} \right)
162: \nonumber \\ && {}
163: -t_{\perp 2}\sum_{j,\ell,s}
164: \left(c_{j,\ell,s}^\dagger c_{j+1,\ell+1,s}^{}+\mathrm{H.c.} \right)
165: \nonumber \\ && {}
166: + U \sum_{j,\ell} n_{j,\ell,\uparrow} n_{j,\ell,\downarrow}
167: -\mu \sum_{j,\ell,s} c_{j,\ell,s}^\dagger c_{j,\ell,s}^{}.
168: \label{eq:model}
169: \end{eqnarray}
170: %====================================================================
171: The operator $c_{j,\ell,s}$ denotes the annihilation of an electron
172: on the $j$th site in the $\ell$th chain with spin $s$, and
173: $n_{j,\ell,s}=c_{j,\ell,s}^\dagger c_{j,\ell,s}^{}-\frac{1}{2}$.
174: Here $\ell=1,\cdots,N_\perp$ is the chain index.
175: We take the continuum limit along the chain direction, whereas
176: in the transverse direction we consider a finite system
177: having an even number of chains $N_\perp$ with
178: the boundary condition $c_{j,N_\perp+1,s}=c_{j,1,s}$.
179: By applying a Fourier transform,
180: the kinetic term can be rewritten as
181: $H_0 = \sum_{\bm k,s}
182: \varepsilon(\bm k) \,
183: c_s^\dagger (\bm k) \,c_s^{} (\bm k)$,
184: where $\bm k \equiv (k_\parallel,k_\perp)$ and
185: the energy dispersion is given by
186: $\varepsilon(\bm k) =
187: -2t_\parallel \cos k_\parallel
188: -2t_{\perp 1} \cos k_\perp
189: -2t_{\perp 2} \cos (k_\parallel + k_\perp) - \mu$.
190: For $|t_{\perp i}| \ll t_\parallel$,
191: the right- and left-moving electrons in the 1D case are well-defined
192: due to an open Fermi surface [Fig.\ \ref{fig:model}(b)] and
193: the shape of the Fermi surface can be parametrized by the
194: transverse momentum $k_\perp$ \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}.
195: To lowest order in the interchain hoppings
196: $t_{\perp 1}$ and $t_{\perp 2}$,
197: the Fermi surfaces for right $(+)$ and left $(-)$ moving electrons,
198: as a function of $k_\perp$,
199: are given by
200: $k_F^\pm(k_\perp)
201: = \pm (\pi/2)
202: \pm (t_{\perp 1}/t_\parallel) \cos k_\perp
203: - (t_{\perp 2}/t_\parallel) \sin k_\perp$
204: and the chemical potential is $\mu=O(t_{\perp i}^2)$.
205: By considering the weak-interacting case
206: and neglecting the $k_\perp$ dependence of the velocity,
207: the linearized dispersion used in the RG method takes the simple form:
208: $\varepsilon_p (\bm k)= p v[k_\parallel -k_F^p(k_\perp)]$
209: with $v=2t_\parallel$ and $p=\pm$.
210:
211: %====================================================================
212: \begin{figure}[t]
213: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{fig1.eps}
214: \caption{
215: (Color online).
216: (a) Lattice geometry of the present model.
217: (b) The corresponding Fermi surface where
218: the case for $N_\perp =16$ is shown.
219: }
220: \label{fig:model}
221: \end{figure}
222: %======================================================================
223:
224:
225:
226: We follow the formulation of the two-loop RG
227: method of Ref.\ \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}
228: and first introduce the $g$-ology coupling constants
229: [see Eq.\ (2.8) in Ref.\ \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}]:,
230: namely the backward ($g_{1\perp}$), forward ($g_{2\perp}$),
231: and umklapp ($g_{3\perp}$) scatterings with opposite spins, and
232: the forward scattering ($g_\parallel$) and umklapp
233: ($g_{3\parallel}$) scatterings for parallel spins.
234: The coupling constants are
235: renormalized differently, developing an external -- transverse -- momenta
236: dependence in the vertex corresponding to a patch-index dependence;
237: that is, $g_\nu \to g_{\nu(q_\perp,k_{\perp 1},k_{\perp 2})}$,
238: where $k_{\perp 1}$ and $k_{\perp 2}$ are the transverse momenta
239: for the right-going fermions, and $q_\perp$ is the
240: momentum transfer \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}.
241: The magnitude of the initial couplings are
242: given by
243: $g_{1\perp}=g_{2\perp}=g_{3\perp}=U$ and
244: $g_{\parallel}=g_{3\parallel}=0$.
245: The RG equations are derived by
246: scaling the bandwidth cutoff $\Lambda(\simeq 2\pi t_\parallel )$ as
247: $\Lambda_l= \Lambda e^{-l}$, where $l$ is the scaling parameter
248: \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}.
249: The explicit forms of the two-loop RG equations
250: for all coupling constants
251: in the case $t_{\perp2}=0$ are
252: given in Ref.\ \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}.
253: We solve here these two-loop RG equations numerically for
254: a system with $N_\perp=16$.
255: For even $N_\perp$, the solution of the RG flows
256: indicates the existence of a finite spin gap in the low-energy limit,
257: which is expected to vanish
258: in the infinite $N_\perp$ limit.
259: The characteristic scale $l_{N_\perp}$ above which
260: finite size effect would appear can be
261: roughly estimated to be
262: $l_{N_\perp} \approx
263: \ln [\Lambda/|t_{\perp i} \sin (2\pi/N_\perp)|]$.
264: For $N_\perp=16$
265: and $t_{\perp 1}/t_\parallel=0.1$
266: this gives $l_{N_\perp}\approx 5$,
267: which is sufficient to obtain the MI transition
268: without finite size effects
269: for the present choice of parameters $U/t_\parallel=2$ or $1.5$.
270:
271:
272: For the bipartite lattice ($t_{\perp2}=0$),
273: the system remains always insulating
274: even for large $t_{\perp1}$ \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}.
275: This is due to
276: perfect nesting condition for the Fermi surface.
277: In this case the interchain hopping $t_{\perp1}$ is relevant and becomes
278: large under scaling procedure, and
279: some umklapp
280: couplings become small. However,
281: a macroscopic number of these
282: couplings remains relevant
283: due to perfect nesting at vector
284: $\bm Q=(\pi,\pi)$.
285: In the case of large $t_{\perp2}$,
286: these relevant umklapp
287: couplings
288: are strongly reduced
289: and all umklapp terms
290: remain weak.
291: The charge gap then collapses
292: and a metallic state
293: with a Fermi surface emerges as a consequence of
294: nesting deviations that are introduced
295: by large interchain frustration.
296:
297:
298:
299:
300: One-particle properties are best studied from the
301: quasiparticle weight $z_{k_\perp}$.
302: In the RG method at the two-loop level \cite{Tsuchiizu2006},
303: the $k_\perp$ dependence of the
304: self-energy is taken into account in a non perturbative way. This contrasts with the chain-DMFT, which treats
305: the one-particle self-energy, as a one-chain
306: $k_\perp$-independent quantity of
307: the one-particle Green's function
308: \cite{Giamarchi2001}. In the RG formalism
309: the transverse momentum dependence \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}
310: is taken into account explicitly, and
311: the quasiparticle weight of the one-particle Green's function
312: takes the form
313: $z_{k_\perp}\equiv z_{k_\perp}^{n} z_{k_\perp}^{u}$,
314: where $z_{k_\perp}^{n}$ and $z_{k_\perp}^{u}$
315: are the contributions
316: coming from the normal and umklapp parts of the scattering,
317: respectively.
318: Here,
319: one can focus on the umklapp contribution
320: $z_{k_\perp}^{u}$,
321: since $z_{k_\perp}^{n}$ remains finite for
322: $l<l_{N_\perp}$ in the metallic state.
323: The explicit form of $z_{k_\perp}^{u}$ reads
324: \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}
325: %====================================================================
326: \begin{eqnarray}
327: && \hspace*{-.5cm}
328: z_{k_{\!\perp}}^{u}
329: \! = \!
330: \exp
331: \left[
332: -\frac{1}{2N_\perp^2} \sum_{q\!_\perp,k'_{\!\perp}} \int
333: dl \,
334: G_{\Sigma u(q_{\!\perp},k_{\!\perp},k'_{\!\perp})}^2 \,
335: J^{u}_{1(q_{\!\perp},k_{\!\perp},k'_{\!\perp})}
336: \right],
337: \nonumber \\
338: \label{eq:z}
339: \\
340: && \hspace*{-.5cm}
341: G_{\Sigma u(q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)}^2 \equiv
342: G_{c(q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)}^2
343: + G_{c(\pi-q_\perp+k_\perp+k'_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)}^2
344: \nonumber \\ && {}\qquad\qquad
345: - G_{c(q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)} G_{c(\pi-q_\perp+k_\perp+k'_\perp,
346: k_\perp,k'_\perp)},
347: \end{eqnarray}
348: %====================================================================
349: where $G_{c(q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)}
350: \equiv g_{3\perp(q_\perp,k_\perp,\pi-k'_\perp)}/(2\pi v)$.
351: The quantity
352: $J^{u}_{1(q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)}$ is a
353: cutoff function depending on the transverse dispersion
354: \cite{Tsuchiizu2006}
355: given by
356: $J^{u}_{1(q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)} =1$ for
357: $|A_{q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp}'|\ll \Lambda$ and
358: $J^{u}_{1(q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)} \approx 0$ for
359: $|A_{q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp}'|\gg \Lambda$ where
360: $A_{q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp}' \equiv
361: 2t_{\perp 1} [\cos k _\perp + \cos (k_\perp-q_\perp)
362: - \cos k'_\perp - \cos (k'_\perp-q_\perp)]
363: - 2t_{\perp 2} [\sin k_\perp - \sin (k_\perp-q_\perp)
364: + \sin k'_\perp - \sin (k'_\perp-q_\perp)]$.
365: The $k_\perp$ dependence of
366: the umklapp-scattering contribution to $z_{k_\perp}$
367: for several values of $t_{\perp2}$
368: at fixed $t_{\perp1}/t_\parallel=0.1$
369: is shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:phasediagram} (a).
370: For weak frustration $t_{\perp2}(<t_{\perp2}^{\mathrm{c}})$, this quantity
371: is small showing the existence of an insulating phase
372: with no low-energy quasiparticles.
373: On the other hand,
374: for strong frustration $t_{\perp2}(>t_{\perp2}^{\mathrm{c}})$,
375: it takes sizable values and shows a strong $k_\perp$ dependence.
376: In the proximity of the insulating phase,
377: the quantity $z_{k_\perp}^{u}$ presents a broad maximum
378: around $k_\perp \approx \pm \pi /2$,
379: which behavior implies the emergence of
380: sections of Fermi surface
381: \cite{Essler2002}, or ``cold'' regions
382: around $\bm k \approx (k_F^p(\pm\pi/2),\pm\pi/2)$
383: \cite{Duprat2001}.
384: The dips or ``hot spots'' in the quasiparticle weight correspond to
385: regions of the Fermi surface where the nesting,
386: within $2\pi/N_\perp$ accuracy, remain
387: the most favorable.
388: In the perfectly nested case no Fermi surface is found for
389: any value of $U$. The overall profile is then intrinsically linked to
390: the momentum dependent nesting properties
391: over the whole Fermi surface \cite{Rohe06}. These are not taken
392: into account in previous analyses
393: \cite{Giamarchi2001,Essler2002},
394: which reach different conclusions in the weak-coupling regime.
395:
396: %====================================================================
397: \begin{figure}[b]
398: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{fig2.eps}
399: \caption{
400: (Color online).
401: (a) Umklapp-scattering contribution of the
402: quasiparticle weight
403: $z_{k_\perp}^{\mathrm{u}}$
404: for $U/t_\parallel=2$ and
405: $t_{\perp1}/t_\parallel=0.1$,
406: with several $t_{\perp2}$.
407: (b) Ground-state phase diagram
408: on the plane of $t_{\perp1}/t_\parallel$ and $t_{\perp2}/t_\parallel$.
409: The dotted line denotes the condition of Eq.\ (\ref{eq:boundary}).
410: }
411: \label{fig:phasediagram}
412: \end{figure}
413: %======================================================================
414:
415:
416:
417: The boundary for the metal-insulator transition
418: can be determined analytically
419: by noting that
420: the metallic phase of the RG analysis is linked to the irrelevance
421: of umklapp scattering.
422: The metallic phase boundary can thus be obtained when
423: the energy scale of imperfect nesting
424: for umklapp scatterings
425: becomes comparable to the energy scale
426: $\Delta_\rho^{\mathrm{1D}}$ [$\propto \sqrt{t_\parallel U} \exp(-2\pi t/U)$]
427: of the 1D Mott gap.
428: By noting that the nesting vector of the particle-hole loop,
429: which couples to umklapp,
430: is given by
431: $\bm Q = (\pi, \pi \pm 2\alpha )$ with $\tan \alpha=t_{\perp2}/t_{\perp1}$,
432: the degree of the imperfect nesting (the amplitude
433: of the quantity $A'_{\pi\pm 2\alpha,k_\perp,k'_\perp}$) becomes
434: $\sqrt{t_{\perp 1}^2 + t_{\perp2}^2} \sin 2 \alpha$.
435: The phase boundary for the MI transition is
436: then determined by the condition
437: %====================================================================
438: \begin{equation}
439: \frac{t_{\perp1}t_{\perp2}}{\sqrt{t_{\perp 1}^2 + t_{\perp2}^2}}
440: = c \Delta_\rho^{\mathrm{1D}},
441: \label{eq:boundary}
442: \end{equation}
443: %====================================================================
444: where $c $ is a numerical constant being of the order of unity.
445: The small difference between the numerical results and
446: the above analytical expression comes from
447: the renormalization of interchain hopping due to
448: the normal scattering processes. The Mott gap is
449: also renormalized by interchain hopping.
450: The ground-state phase diagram in the $(t_{\perp1}/t_\parallel, t_{\perp2}/t_\parallel)$ plane is shown in
451: Fig.\ \ref{fig:phasediagram}(b), where
452: the dotted line denotes Eq.\ (\ref{eq:boundary}).
453: The ambiguities in the cutoff functions of the RG
454: \cite{Doucot2003,Tsuchiizu2006},
455: prevent us from obtaining a precise location of the phase
456: boundary.
457:
458:
459:
460: The Mott transition has also been
461: addressed in two-dimensional Hubbard model
462: on an anisotropic triangular lattice
463: with nearest-neighbor hopping $t$ and
464: next-nearest neighbor hopping $t'$
465: \cite{Imada_Kyung}.
466: The present model (\ref{eq:model}) can be connected to the
467: two-dimensional Hubbard model
468: by taking
469: $t_{\parallel}\to t$, $t_{\perp1}\to t$, and
470: $t_{\perp2}\to t'$.
471: While our approach is restricted to the small
472: interchain hopping,
473: the metal-insulator transition obtained here
474: for finite frustration is consistent with the numerical results
475: in two dimensions.
476:
477:
478:
479:
480: From the solution of the scaling flows of the umklapp scatterings,
481: the temperature dependence of the resistivity can be qualitatively
482: calculated
483: from the memory function approach
484: combined with the RG method
485: by using $l=\ln (\Lambda/T)$ \cite{Giamarchi_book,Giamarchi1991}.
486: By extending the approach to the quasi-1D case,
487: the perturbative expression of the conductivity reads
488: $\rho(T) \propto N_\perp^{-3} \sum_{q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp}
489: G_{c(q_\perp,k_\perp,k'_\perp)}^2(l) \, e^{-l}$.
490: While this formula is not valid for large $t_{\perp i}/T$
491: \cite{Giamarchi1991},
492: it will depict the qualitative temperature dependence
493: of resistivity.
494: Typical behaviors of the resistivity
495: for $\Delta_\rho^{\mathrm{1D}}< t_{\perp 1}$,
496: obtained
497: from this formula, are shown in Fig.\ \ref{fig:resis}(a).
498: At high temperature ($T>t_{\perp 1}$, $t_{\perp2}$),
499: the effects of interchain kinetics are masked due to the
500: thermal fluctuations where the Tomonaga-Luttinger (TL) liquid behavior
501: is reproduced.
502: At low temperature, the insulating behavior can be seen
503: for small $t_{\perp2}$,
504: while the metallic behavior is found for strong
505: frustration (large $t_{\perp2}$).
506: A finite-temperature phase diagram,
507: as a function of $t_{\perp2}$,
508: can be obtained from this behavior,
509: as shown schematically
510: in Fig.\ \ref{fig:resis}(b).
511: At high temperature,
512: the TL liquid state is realized,
513: which is followed
514: in the crossover region by the development of a
515: Fermi surface.
516: The effect of the frustration
517: is yet masked by thermal fluctuations, i.e.,
518: this region can be described effectively by a nested Fermi surface.
519: At further low temperature, the state moves to the Mott insulator
520: or the Fermi liquid (FL) state depending on $t_{\perp2}$.
521: In the FL state, the effect of $t_{\perp2}$ becomes prominent and
522: the nesting conditions of the full Fermi surface
523: are altered.
524: It can also be seen from Fig.\ \ref{fig:resis}(a) that
525: the characteristic temperature $T_{\mathrm{FL}}$ at which the
526: crossover to the metallic FL state takes place
527: increases with $t_{\perp 2}$.
528: For $\Delta_\rho^{\mathrm{1D}} > t_{\perp 1}$,
529: on the other hand, a direct crossover from the TL liquid
530: state to the Mott insulator would be seen, and neither the FL
531: state nor the crossover region appears in the phase diagram.
532:
533: %====================================================================
534: \begin{figure}[t]
535: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{fig3.eps}
536: \caption{
537: (Color online).
538: (a)Temperature dependence of the resistivity
539: for $U/t_{\parallel}=1.5$ and $t_{\perp1}/t_{\parallel}=0.1$,
540: with fixed $t_{\perp2}/t_\parallel=$ 0, 0.02. 0.04, 0.06, 0.08,
541: 0.10 (from top to bottom), and $\rho_0=\rho(\Lambda)$.
542: $T_\rho$
543: is the characteristic temperature
544: of the Mott insulator, at which the resistivity takes a minimum.
545: $T_{\mathrm{FL}}$ is the crossover temperature
546: to the metallic Fermi liquid, where the power of $\rho(T)$ exhibits
547: a change (guided by the eyes).
548: (b) Schematic illustration of the $t_{\perp2}$-$T$ phase diagram.
549: $T_{\mathrm{FL}}^0$ is
550: the bare temperature scale for imperfect nesting
551: [left of Eq.\ (\ref{eq:boundary})], which is reduced to
552: $T_{\mathrm{FL}}$ due to the correlation effects.
553: }
554: \label{fig:resis}
555: \end{figure}
556: %======================================================================
557:
558:
559:
560:
561:
562: We would like to discuss here the impact of our results on the understanding
563: of the phase diagram of the quasi-1D molecular compound
564: (TTM-TTP)I$_3$ under pressure
565: \cite{Yasuzuka}.
566: The extended H\"uckel
567: calculations \cite{Mori1994}
568: indicate that
569: there are two kinds of interchain
570: transfer integrals, namely $t_{\perp1}\approx 9$ meV,
571: and $t_{\perp 2}\approx 6$ meV,
572: which are small compared to $t_\parallel\approx 260$ meV.
573: This emphasizes the pronounced hopping frustration of this quasi-1D compound.
574: The Coulomb repulsion between electrons
575: on the same molecular orbital of TTM-TTP is weak,
576: and the estimated magnitude, $U \approx$ 0.57 eV \cite{Mori1997},
577: leads to the magnitude
578: $U/t_\parallel \approx 2.2$
579: and then the small 1D Mott gap
580: $\Delta_\rho^{\mathrm{1D}}/t_\parallel \approx 0.24$.
581: From these figures,
582: the energy scale for imperfect nesting
583: [left-hand side of Eq.\ (\ref{eq:boundary})] turns out to be
584: about 5 meV. As for the magnitude
585: of the charge gap
586: at ambient pressure, we obtain
587: $\Delta_\rho^{\mathrm{1D}} \approx 60$ meV,
588: in fair agreement with the measured
589: activation energy of resistivity
590: at ambient pressure \cite{Mori1997}.
591: The bandwidth goes up under pressure, which decreases
592: the ratio $U/t_\parallel$ and in turn the charge gap.
593: To reduce the gap down to the
594: scale of imperfect nesting,
595: one has roughly to double the hopping amplitudes.
596: This represents a reasonable increase of band parameters under 8 GPa
597: of pressure,
598: and is consistent with the existence of a MI transition
599: in (TTM-TTP)I$_3$ \cite{Yasuzuka}.
600: Finally, we note that at ambient pressure, below
601: $T_{\mathrm{c}}\simeq$ 120 K, this compound develops a nonmagnetic
602: state (likely of the spin-Peierls type), which comes with an
603: \textit{intra-molecular} charge disproportionation \cite{Mori2004}.
604: However, since the resistivity already shows
605: an insulating behavior above $T_{\mathrm{c}}$,
606: the present system can be indeed considered as a
607: Mott insulator rather than a charge-ordered insulator, and
608: the charge disproportionation
609: can be accounted for by dimerization of the tilted TTM-TTP molecules.
610:
611:
612:
613: In summary, we have examined the effect of interchain frustration
614: on the half-filled quasi-1D Hubbard chains
615: by applying an $N_\perp$-chain two-loop RG method.
616: The triangular lattice geometry of the system
617: is found to be a key factor in the stability of the
618: Mott insulating state and whenever the alteration
619: of nesting conditions due to frustration
620: in the transverse hoppings reaches some threshold
621: a metallic state is restored.
622: Our results find direct application to the description of
623: the frustrated quasi-1D half-filled compounds.
624:
625:
626: One of the authors (M.T.) thanks S.\ Yasuzuka, T.\ Kawamoto,
627: T.\ Mori, A.\ L\"auchli, T.\ Giamarchi, and C.\ Berthod
628: for valuable discussions.
629: This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for
630: Scientific Research on Priority Areas of Molecular Conductors
631: (No.\ 15073213) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture,
632: Japan.
633:
634:
635:
636:
637:
638:
639: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
640: %--------------------------
641: \bibitem{Imada1998}
642: M.\ Imada, A.\ Fujimori, and Y.\ Tokura,
643: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ \textbf{70}, 1039 (1998).
644: %--------------------------
645: %--------------------------
646: \bibitem{Kim2006}
647: B.J.\ Kim \textit{et al.},
648: Nature Phys.\ \textbf{2}, 397 (2006).
649: %--------------------------
650: %--------------------------
651: \bibitem{Mori1997}
652: T.\ Mori \textit{et al.},
653: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{79}, 1702 (1997).
654: %--------------------------
655: %--------------------------
656: \bibitem{Mori2004}
657: T.\ Mori, Chem.\ Rev.\ \textbf{104}, 4947 (2004).
658: %--------------------------
659: %--------------------------
660: \bibitem{Yasuzuka}
661: S.\ Yasuzuka \textit{et al.},
662: J.\ Phys.\ Soc.\ Jpn.\ \textbf{75}, 053701 (2006);
663: J.\ Low.\ Temp.\ Phys.\ \textbf{142}, 197 (2006).
664: %--------------------------
665: %--------------------------
666: \bibitem{Dzyaloshinskii72}
667: I.\ E.\ Dzyaloshinskii and A.\ I.\ Larkin,
668: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP, \textbf{34}, 422 (1972).
669: %--------------------------
670: %--------------------------
671: \bibitem{Bourbonnais2003}
672: C.\ Bourbonnais, B.\ Guay, and R.\ Wortis,
673: in \textit{Theoretical Methods for Strongly Correlated Electrons}
674: eds.\ D.\ S\'en\'echal, A.\ M.\ Tremblay, and C.\ Bourbonnais
675: (New York, Springer, 2003) p.\ 77.
676: %--------------------------
677: %--------------------------
678: \bibitem{Giamarchi_book}
679: T. Giamarchi,
680: \textit{Quantum Physics in One Dimension}
681: (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004).
682: %--------------------------
683: %--------------------------
684: \bibitem{Essler2002}
685: F.\ H.\ L.\ Essler and A.\ M.\ Tsvelik,
686: Phys.\ Rev.\ B \textbf{65}, 115117 (2002).
687: %--------------------------
688: %--------------------------
689: \bibitem{Giamarchi2001}
690: S.\ Biermann \textit{et al.},
691: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \textbf{87}, 276405 (2001);
692: %
693: T.\ Giamarchi \textit{et al.},
694: J.\ Phys.\ IV France \textbf{114}, 23 (2004);
695: %
696: C.\ Berthod \textit{et al.},
697: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{97}, 136401 (2006).
698: %--------------------------
699: %--------------------------
700: \bibitem{Tsuchiizu2006}
701: M.\ Tsuchiizu,
702: Phys.\ Rev.\ B \textbf{74}, 155109 (2006).
703: %--------------------------
704: %--------------------------
705: \bibitem{Tsuchiizu2006b}
706: M.\ Tsuchiizu, Y.\ Suzumura, and C.\ Bourbonnais,
707: J.\ Phys.\ Cond.\ Mat.\ \textbf{19}, 145228 (2007).
708: %--------------------------
709: %--------------------------
710: \bibitem{Duprat2001}
711: R.\ Duprat and C.\ Bourbonnais,
712: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ B \textbf{21}, 219 (2001);
713: C.\ Bourbonnais and R.\ Duprat,
714: J.\ Phys.\ IV France \textbf{114}, 3 (2004).
715: %--------------------------
716: %--------------------------
717: \bibitem{Doucot2003}
718: S. Dusuel and B.\ Dou\c{c}ot,
719: Phys.\ Rev.\ B \textbf{67}, 205111(2003).
720: %--------------------------
721: %--------------------------
722: \bibitem{Rohe06}
723: D.\ Rohe and A.\ Georges, cond-mat/0608032.
724: %--------------------------
725: %--------------------------
726: \bibitem{Imada_Kyung}
727: T.\ Kashima and M.\ Imada,
728: J.\ Phys.\ Soc.\ Jpn.\ \textbf{70}, 3052 (2001);
729: B.\ Kyung and A.\ -M.\ S.\ Tremblay,
730: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{97}, 046402 (2006).
731: %--------------------------
732: %--------------------------
733: \bibitem{Giamarchi1991}
734: T.\ Giamarchi,
735: Phys.\ Rev.\ B \textbf{44}, 2905 (1991).
736: %--------------------------
737: %--------------------------
738: \bibitem{Mori1994}
739: T.\ Mori \textit{et al.},
740: Bull.\ Chem.\ Soc.\ Jpn.\ \textbf{67}, 661 (1994).
741: %--------------------------
742:
743: \end{thebibliography}
744:
745: \end{document}
746:
747:
748:
749:
750:
751:
752:
753: