1: <html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
2: xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
3: xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
4:
5: <head>
6: <meta name=Title content="'Negotiated Liberalization': Stakeholder Politics and">
7: <meta name=Keywords content="">
8: <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=macintosh">
9: <meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
10: <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 9">
11: <meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 9">
12: <link rel=File-List href="Negotiated%20liberalization_files/filelist.xml">
13: <title>'Negotiated Liberalization': Stakeholder Politics and</title>
14: <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
15: <o:DocumentProperties>
16: <o:Author>Robert Horwitz</o:Author>
17: <o:Template>Normal</o:Template>
18: <o:LastAuthor>Robert Horwitz</o:LastAuthor>
19: <o:Revision>2</o:Revision>
20: <o:LastPrinted>2000-12-13T20:36:00Z</o:LastPrinted>
21: <o:Created>2001-09-25T00:19:00Z</o:Created>
22: <o:LastSaved>2001-09-25T00:19:00Z</o:LastSaved>
23: <o:Pages>3</o:Pages>
24: <o:Words>8473</o:Words>
25: <o:Characters>48298</o:Characters>
26: <o:Company>Communication Dept. UCSd</o:Company>
27: <o:Lines>402</o:Lines>
28: <o:Paragraphs>96</o:Paragraphs>
29: <o:CharactersWithSpaces>59313</o:CharactersWithSpaces>
30: <o:Version>9.2511</o:Version>
31: </o:DocumentProperties>
32: </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
33: <w:WordDocument>
34: <w:DoNotHyphenateCaps/>
35: <w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>0 pt</w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>
36: <w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>0 pt</w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>
37: <w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>
38: <w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>
39: <w:UseMarginsForDrawingGridOrigin/>
40: <w:DrawingGridHorizontalOrigin>0 pt</w:DrawingGridHorizontalOrigin>
41: <w:DrawingGridVerticalOrigin>0 pt</w:DrawingGridVerticalOrigin>
42: <w:DoNotShadeFormData/>
43: <w:Compatibility>
44: <w:OrigWordTableRules/>
45: <w:NoLeading/>
46: <w:SpacingInWholePoints/>
47: <w:ShowBreaksInFrames/>
48: <w:SuppressTopSpacing/>
49: <w:SuppressTopSpacingMac5/>
50: <w:MWSmallCaps/>
51: <w:UsePrinterMetrics/>
52: <w:WW6BorderRules/>
53: <w:FootnoteLayoutLikeWW8/>
54: <w:ShapeLayoutLikeWW8/>
55: <w:AlignTablesRowByRow/>
56: <w:ForgetLastTabAlignment/>
57: <w:DoNotUseHTMLParagraphAutoSpacing/>
58: <w:LayoutRawTableWidth/>
59: <w:LayoutTableRowsApart/>
60: <w:UseWord97LineBreakingRules/>
61: </w:Compatibility>
62: </w:WordDocument>
63: </xml><![endif]-->
64: <style>
65: <!--
66: /* Font Definitions */
67: @font-face
68: {font-family:"Times New Roman";
69: panose-1:2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3 4;
70: mso-font-charset:0;
71: mso-generic-font-family:auto;
72: mso-font-pitch:variable;
73: mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;}
74: @font-face
75: {font-family:"New York";
76: panose-1:2 2 5 2 6 3 5 6 2 4;
77: mso-font-charset:0;
78: mso-generic-font-family:auto;
79: mso-font-pitch:variable;
80: mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;}
81: /* Style Definitions */
82: p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
83: {mso-style-parent:"";
84: margin:0in;
85: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
86: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
87: font-size:12.0pt;
88: font-family:"New York";}
89: h1
90: {mso-style-next:Normal;
91: margin:0in;
92: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
93: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
94: page-break-after:avoid;
95: mso-outline-level:1;
96: font-size:12.0pt;
97: font-family:"New York";
98: mso-font-kerning:0pt;
99: text-decoration:underline;
100: text-underline:single;
101: font-weight:normal;}
102: h2
103: {mso-style-next:Normal;
104: margin:0in;
105: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
106: text-indent:22.0pt;
107: line-height:24.0pt;
108: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
109: page-break-after:avoid;
110: mso-outline-level:2;
111: font-size:12.0pt;
112: font-family:"New York";
113: text-decoration:underline;
114: text-underline:single;
115: font-weight:normal;}
116: h3
117: {mso-style-next:Normal;
118: margin:0in;
119: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
120: text-align:center;
121: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
122: page-break-after:avoid;
123: mso-outline-level:3;
124: font-size:12.0pt;
125: font-family:"New York";}
126: p.MsoFootnoteText, li.MsoFootnoteText, div.MsoFootnoteText
127: {margin:0in;
128: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
129: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
130: font-size:10.0pt;
131: font-family:"New York";}
132: p.MsoHeader, li.MsoHeader, div.MsoHeader
133: {margin:0in;
134: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
135: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
136: tab-stops:center 3.0in right 6.0in;
137: font-size:12.0pt;
138: font-family:"New York";}
139: p.MsoBodyTextIndent, li.MsoBodyTextIndent, div.MsoBodyTextIndent
140: {margin:0in;
141: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
142: text-indent:22.0pt;
143: line-height:24.0pt;
144: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
145: font-size:12.0pt;
146: font-family:Times;}
147: p.MsoBodyText2, li.MsoBodyText2, div.MsoBodyText2
148: {margin:0in;
149: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
150: text-indent:22.0pt;
151: line-height:24.0pt;
152: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
153: font-size:12.0pt;
154: font-family:"New York";}
155: p.MsoBodyTextIndent2, li.MsoBodyTextIndent2, div.MsoBodyTextIndent2
156: {margin:0in;
157: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
158: text-indent:22.5pt;
159: line-height:24.0pt;
160: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
161: font-size:12.0pt;
162: font-family:Times;}
163: p.MsoBodyTextIndent3, li.MsoBodyTextIndent3, div.MsoBodyTextIndent3
164: {margin:0in;
165: margin-bottom:.0001pt;
166: text-indent:22.0pt;
167: line-height:24.0pt;
168: mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
169: font-size:12.0pt;
170: font-family:Times;
171: font-weight:bold;}
172: /* Page Definitions */
173: @page
174: {mso-page-border-surround-header:no;
175: mso-page-border-surround-footer:no;}
176: @page Section1
177: {size:611.0pt 11.0in;
178: margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
179: mso-header-margin:.5in;
180: mso-footer-margin:.5in;
181: mso-title-page:yes;
182: mso-header:url(":Negotiated liberalization_files:header.htm") h1;
183: mso-paper-source:0;}
184: div.Section1
185: {page:Section1;}
186: -->
187: </style>
188: </head>
189:
190: <body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US style='tab-interval:.5in'>
191:
192: <div class=Section1>
193:
194: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
195: style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Times'>'Negotiated Liberalization':
196: Stakeholder Politics and<o:p></o:p></span></p>
197:
198: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
199: style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Times'>Communication Sector Reform in South
200: Africa<o:p></o:p></span></p>
201:
202: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
203: style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
204:
205: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
206: style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
207:
208: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
209: style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Times'>Robert B. Horwitz<o:p></o:p></span></p>
210:
211: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
212: style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
213:
214: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
215: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
216:
217: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
218: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
219:
220: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
221: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
222:
223: <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span
224: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
225:
226: <p class=MsoBodyTextIndent style='text-indent:0in'><span style='font-size:14.0pt'>M</span>uch
227: has been written about the seeming inexorable march of globalization and the
228: power of global capitalism to mold state policies according to its
229: requirements.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Yet the nation-state
230: remains the center of political action and social solidarity.<span
231: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Notwithstanding the transformational
232: power accorded to globalization, any given country's public institutions remain
233: more tied to the specific political architecture of states than they are
234: directly determined by the forces of globalization.<span style="mso-spacerun:
235: yes"> </span>This can be seen in the communication realm.<span
236: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Old monopoly structures in
237: telecommunications and broadcasting have been giving way to new models of
238: liberalization, competition, and privatization.<span style="mso-spacerun:
239: yes"> </span>Such models are pushed by transnational corporations,
240: multilateral organizations, and trade regimes.<span style="mso-spacerun:
241: yes"> </span>But though globalization creates pressures, opportunities
242: and constraints, communication reforms are shaped largely by domestic actors
243: through domestic political institutions.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
244: </span>Post-apartheid South Africa is a case in point.</p>
245:
246: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
247: style='font-family:Times'>The end of apartheid in South Africa entailed not
248: just a political transformation from racial authoritarianism to one person -
249: one vote democracy, it encompassed the widespread reform of a great many
250: national institutions -- social, political, economic, cultural.<span
251: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>How could various government functions,
252: economic sectors, cultural organizations, and the like be stripped of their
253: apartheid pedigree and converted into democratic and accountable institutions
254: capable of serving the needs and reflecting the aspirations of the previously
255: disadvantaged black majority?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The
256: economy was and remains the key terrain of struggle in this regard, inasmuch as
257: the economy, more than any other post-apartheid institution, determines the
258: life-chances of now politically enfranchised South African citizens.<span
259: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But accountability in economic
260: institutions is not just accountability to the newly democratic polity; it also
261: now encompasses accountability and adaptation to the "rules" and
262: constraints of the new global economy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
263: </span>Indeed, South Africa's transition to democracy, like many other grand
264: political transitions of the last couple of decades, was a <u>double</u>
265: transition: from authoritarianism to democracy, and from a controlled or
266: command economy to a market system more or less in line with the exigencies of
267: globalization.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
268:
269: <p class=MsoBodyTextIndent>Communication was one of the sectors in South Africa
270: to undergo early reform.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In
271: broadcasting, telecommunications, and the state information agency, apartheid
272: structures and institutions were replaced by those that at first glance don't
273: look too different from those in most developed nations and that seem to
274: comport nicely with the liberalization "requirements" posed by global
275: capitalism.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>--That is, mixed
276: systems of public and private service providers, open to foreign investment,
277: with regulatory oversight.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But that
278: first glance is illusory.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>These
279: are deceptively progressive institutions created by a process of
280: "negotiated liberalization," in which a retrograde sector was
281: transformed into a set of accountable institutions -- in both of the senses
282: described above, to the international economy and the new democratic polity --
283: through a participatory and deliberative democratic stakeholder politics.<span
284: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Negotiated liberalization, a term
285: coined by South African scholars Glenn Adler and Eddie Webster (Adler and
286: Webster (1995, 2000; Webster and Adler, 1999), captures the complexity of the
287: political bargaining among the state and civil society groups in the reform of
288: key institutions.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>It shows that
289: there is some room for progressive maneuver in reforming institutions to meet
290: the exigencies of the global economy, and, moreover, that participatory
291: democratic policy-making can make both liberalization and the state more
292: progressive and more legitimate.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
293: </span>The latter of is no small importance given the threat that
294: globally-prescribed liberalization poses to new democracies, where, frequently,
295: the process of institutional reform is fenced off from politics and the cost of
296: reforming the economy falls on the backs of the poor and the working class (see
297: Przeworski et al, 1995).</p>
298:
299: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
300:
301: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
302: style='font-family:Times'>In a nutshell, the reform of the communication sector
303: in South Africa accomplished the following results:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
304:
305: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'>•
306: Broadcasting:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In the apartheid
307: era, the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) more or less monopolized
308: radio and television broadcasting.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
309: </span>A putative public broadcaster but in reality an arm of the apartheid
310: state, the SABC reflected the National Party's political agenda and vigorously
311: promoted apartheid ideology in its programming, editorial practices, and
312: hiring.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The SABC was remade in
313: 1993 into a nonpartisan public broadcaster with responsibility to program for
314: all the people in all eleven now official languages.<span style="mso-spacerun:
315: yes"> </span>A new SABC Board of Control, now reflective of the diversity
316: of South Africa's population, was appointed to direct the transformation of the
317: SABC toward a democratic and inclusive orientation.<span style="mso-spacerun:
318: yes"> </span>Constitutional negotiators created an independent regulatory
319: body to direct the changes and to oversee the broadcast sector as a whole.<span
320: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The Independent Broadcasting Authority,
321: or IBA, licensed scores of new, low-power community radio licenses.<span
322: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Some of the SABC radio stations were
323: sold to private bidders and the IBA authorized a new commercial television
324: service.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>All have varying public
325: service and local content requirements.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
326: </span>The South Africa broadcast system is now a mixed system of commercial,
327: community, and public service broadcasting.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
328:
329: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
330:
331: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'>•
332: Telecommunications:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In the old
333: days the South African Post Office operated the state telephone monopoly as an
334: economic infrastructure for apartheid, servicing, for the most part, whites and
335: business.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Exhibiting the kinds of
336: budgetary, efficiency, and monopoly boundary operating problems that
337: state-owned telecommunications companies experienced worldwide in the 1980s,
338: the white minority government initiated a process to modernize the structure of
339: South African telecommunications in 1991 when it created Telkom as a
340: state-owned telecommunications enterprise separated from ministerial
341: control.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Through a stakeholder
342: consultative process, the ANC-led democratic government revamped and completed
343: the process, creating a regulatory body, the South African Telecommunications
344: Regulatory Authority, or SATRA, to oversee the sector.<span
345: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The legislation that established SATRA
346: also plotted a phased liberalization of the sector, opening its various service
347: markets to competition gradually over a period of several years. <span
348: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Resisting both big-bang privatization
349: and retention of full state monopoly, the new policy permitted a foreign
350: telecommunications consortium (a partnership of Telekom Malaysia and US-based
351: SBC Communications) to take a 30% minority stake in Telkom to bring an infusion
352: of capital and expertise.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Telkom
353: now has extensive universal service obligations as a condition of its
354: license.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
355:
356: <p class=MsoHeader style='line-height:150%;tab-stops:.5in'><span
357: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
358:
359: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:200%'><span style='font-family:Times'>•
360: The state information agency, which went under different names over the years
361: (most recently SACS, the South African Communication Service), served as the PR
362: mouthpiece of the apartheid government.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
363: </span>Its main function was to disseminate information about South Africa
364: abroad, to massage the image and undermine criticism of the apartheid state in
365: the international media.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The information
366: agency also engaged in sub-rosa efforts to influence the South African press,
367: by serving as the official conduit of information during the unrest of the
368: 1980s.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In an earlier ploy, the
369: information agency secretly bankrolled an "independent" English-language
370: paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This was the
371: "Muldergate" scandal of the late 1970s, whose exposure had important
372: consequences in shifting the balance of power in the National Party to the
373: moderates under the leadership of PW Botha.<span style="mso-spacerun:
374: yes"> </span>SACS, an institution more connected to intelligence than to
375: communication, was eliminated by the government in 1996.<span
376: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>For space reasons, this paper will not
377: discuss SACS.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
378:
379: <p class=MsoBodyTextIndent2>While the reform of the South African
380: communications sector brings its institutions well in line with liberal
381: democratic international trends and models, in fact South African communication
382: institutions are more progressive than the models they appear to ape.<span
383: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This is due largely to the distinctive
384: internal political processes that established the new communication policies and
385: to the unusually open nature of the South African state during the transition
386: period.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Contrary to current
387: conventional wisdom of top-down, state-directed liberalization, the reforms
388: were built via participatory democratic practice that engaged civil society and
389: the state in policy-making.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>And
390: this process derived less from any unvarnished ANC commitment to participatory
391: democracy than to the strength of a strong political culture of
392: "consultation and transparency" linked to the practices of the trade unions
393: and the township civic organizations during the internal insurrection of the
394: 1980s (see Horwitz, 2001).</p>
395:
396: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
397: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
398:
399: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'><u>The
400: conventional wisdom of<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>political
401: "transitions"</u><o:p></o:p></span></p>
402:
403: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'>The
404: new conventional wisdom among scholars of political transitions is that a
405: successful transition from authoritarianism requires a pact, a set of
406: compromises between hitherto bitterly contending elites that essentially leaves
407: the fundamental structures of capitalist society in place.<span
408: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Largely because of the control that the
409: old regime elite exercises over the machinery of state -- particularly the
410: military -- the pro-democratic forces in the opposition most often must offer
411: concessions in exchange for democracy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
412: </span>The fear of a coup limits pro-democracy options.<span
413: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Hence most successful transitions
414: produce a dispensation that is economically and socially conservative, and
415: which ensures the loyalty of the propertied classes (see, e.g., O'Donnell &
416: Schmitter, 1986; Przeworski, 1991). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
417:
418: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
419: style='font-family:Times'>As if this axiom of political constraint was not
420: enough, the economic forces and institutions of an increasingly globalized
421: capitalism create strong pressures to reform import-substitution
422: industrialization policies -- now considered to be largely archaic -- to
423: comport with the new market.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>These
424: pressures are, of course, particularly strong since the fall of the Soviet
425: Union and the disappearance of a counter-hegemonic power and model to global
426: capitalism.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The economies of new
427: democracies are usually not just out of step with contemporary global economic
428: practice, they are frequently in serious decline and disorder at the moment of
429: political transition (Haggard & Kaufman, 1995).<span style="mso-spacerun:
430: yes"> </span>But securing economic reforms is not easy in developing
431: countries, as they breach the basic social compromise inherent in historically
432: state-directed corporatist development, to wit, the class coalition of
433: industrial and export interests that paid the price of social peace with
434: concessions to the urban masses (Walton & Seddon, 1994).<span
435: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Indeed, as democracy takes hold and
436: becomes consolidated in these transitions from authoritarianism, economic
437: policy is often sealed off from politics.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
438: </span>Only by insulating economic reform from the chaos of distributional
439: claims, so the logic goes, can coherent and necessary economic policies be
440: successfully undertaken.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This
441: axiom is a key component of the so-called Washington consensus on political and
442: institutional reform.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
443:
444: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
445: style='font-family:Times'>The Washington consensus emphasizes fiscal and
446: monetary discipline, outward (export) economic orientation, tax reform,
447: liberalization of product and financial markets, deregulation and
448: privatization, and marketization of state activity (Williamson, 1994).<span
449: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This set of policy proscriptions has
450: become a talisman, a mantra, for virtually all key players in international
451: economics, including the US government, the IMF and World Bank, the big
452: consulting agencies, the WTO (Waterbury, 1992; World Bank, 1995).</span><span
453: style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Times;mso-text-raise:3.0pt'> </span><span
454: style='font-family:Times'><span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Global
455: organizations try to impose these policies on developing nations as a condition
456: of granting a loan or negotiating a trade agreement or a promise of foreign
457: direct investment.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>As suggested
458: above, the policy proscriptions require a standard set of political
459: practices.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Essential reforms can
460: only be secured if the reform process is protected from "special interest
461: groups."<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Organized labor is
462: usually understood as the special interest group par excellence.<span
463: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Labor's key role in democratic
464: transitions seems to be to stabilize them by binding its constituency to
465: democracy at the cost of surrendering the pursuit of social and economic
466: gains.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>And while labor is excluded
467: from the politics of policy reform through its demonization as a disruptive
468: special interest group, even legislatures are sometimes kept out of the
469: policy-making process.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In this
470: reckoning, economic reform requires what amounts to the quiet suspension of
471: democracy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The state fabricates
472: top-down reforms that revamp the economy consonant with current "best
473: practices," that is, in ways that also align it with the interests of
474: global capital.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>While intensely
475: critical of the Washington consensus, some scholars on the left in effect admit
476: its power under the analytic rubric of the tyranny of globalization.<span
477: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This, after all, is what TINA -- the
478: acronym for "there is no alternative" -- comes down to.<span
479: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
480:
481: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
482: style='font-family:Times'>There are problems with both the political
483: elite-pacting axiom and the axiom of globalization's imposition of economic
484: reform when applied to South Africa.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
485: </span>To be sure, crucial elements of elite-pacting were at play in the
486: compromises struck between the National Party and the African National Congress,
487: in ways that approximate the conventional wisdom of political transitions.<span
488: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The ANC felt compelled to guarantee
489: both existing property rights and the security of tenure (including the payment
490: of pensions) in posts for civil servants, as well as the near-complete
491: independence of the central bank (Republic of South Africa, 1993a: sections 28,
492: 236, 245).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>However, the focus of
493: the conventional elite-pacting analysis is too narrow in South Africa's case.<span
494: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>It neglects the role of the trade
495: unions and civil society organizations in the anti-apartheid struggle and
496: slights the other constituent parties in the "tripartite alliance" of
497: the ANC, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU), and the South
498: African Communist Party (SACP).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
499: </span>While the ANC was in exile, the democratic transition in South Africa
500: was fundamentally the product of a general internal mass movement, whose
501: actions and internal participatory political practices set the transition's
502: political agenda.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The unions,
503: fighting with the white regime on behalf of labor rights for blacks, were a
504: central player in the anti-apartheid democratic movement.<span
505: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Black civic organizations campaigned
506: for improved living conditions in the townships and opposed municipal
507: authorities foisted on them by the apartheid state.<span style="mso-spacerun:
508: yes"> </span>Though clearly linked to the ANC in spirit and general
509: ideology, the unions and the "civics" were autonomous manifestations
510: of self-organized activity.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The
511: internal anti-apartheid movement of the 1980s under the umbrella of the United
512: Democratic Front (UDF) not only engaged in mass insurrection, it also provided
513: the kinds of alternative structures and mechanisms that shaped the transition
514: and continue to affect the public debate and the process of consolidating
515: democracy in South Africa.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
516:
517: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
518: style='font-family:Times'>While the problem with an analysis focused on
519: elite-pacting is that it does not explain enough, the economic globalization
520: argument explains too much.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>It
521: would be absurd to deny or belittle the pressures on a developing country by
522: powerful international institutions like the IMF or the WTO, not to mention the
523: "invisible hand" of currency speculation and investment strikes, now
524: more easily abetted by ubiquitous finance and communication networks.<span
525: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But constraints and pressures do not
526: dictate policy outcomes.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
527: </span>Globalization is not an omnipotent force utterly depriving states of
528: maneuvering room in their choice of development policy.<span
529: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Opening a formerly closed economy or a
530: state-owned enterprise to the global market does not necessarily mean whole-hog
531: liberalization and the blood sacrifice of national companies to more efficient
532: and rapacious foreign corporations.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
533: </span>Liberalization can be negotiated, in ways that aim to open up closed and
534: often inefficient institutions while minimizing huge price hikes and their
535: attendant social disruption, or without causing widespread labor layoffs --
536: that is to say, without the cost of reform falling, as it so often does,
537: inordinately on the backs of the poor and the working class.<span
538: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Privatization, a key feature in the
539: economic reform toolkit, is often simply a means to improve a government's
540: balance of payments, or, worse, a political tool to hollow out the state
541: sector.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But privatization,
542: depending on its intent and implementation, can also be a way to revitalize a
543: stagnant, even corrupt, state-owned enterprise.<span style="mso-spacerun:
544: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
545:
546: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
547: style='font-family:Times'>Against the conventional wisdom of the Washington
548: consensus, the reform of the South African communications sector was an example
549: of a kind of negotiated liberalization.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
550: </span>The specific politics of the transition period -- the weakened apartheid
551: state between 1990 and 1994, and the not-yet-consolidated democratic state
552: dominated by the ANC between 1994 and 1996 -- made the state unusually open to
553: participatory politics from below even as it was pressured by international
554: forces from above.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Reform
555: succeeded in the communications sector not because technocrats were insulated
556: from politics, but because reform efforts proceeded by way of participatory and
557: deliberative democratic mechanisms.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
558: </span>Those democratic mechanisms came not so much from the political elites
559: -- even the ANC<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>-- but from the
560: labor movement and the civic organizations that comprised the popular struggle
561: and internal insurrection of the 1980s.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
562: </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
563:
564: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
565: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
566:
567: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'><u>South
568: African civic politics and stakeholder consultation<o:p></o:p></u></span></p>
569:
570: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'>Labor's
571: role in helping bring down apartheid has been documented by many scholars
572: (Friedman, 1987; Baskin, 1991; Waterman, 1991; Seidman, 1994).<span
573: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>COSATU's disciplined militance in the
574: 1980s was an important factor in convincing National Party stalwarts and leading
575: businessmen that whites could no longer dictate South Africa's future
576: alone.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>COSATU's strong
577: organizational mechanisms of internal democracy, of reporting back, and
578: accountability between the leadership and the rank-and-file also influenced the
579: participatory democratic tenor of the latter stages of the anti-apartheid
580: struggle (see Baskin, 1994).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
581: </span>Together with the township civic associations, the labor movement
582: sparked the spread of "stakeholder forums" in the initial transition
583: period after the ANC was legalized in 1990.<span style="mso-spacerun:
584: yes"> </span>Constituted outside of government, in effect forced upon
585: government by anti-apartheid civil society organizations, the forums functioned
586: as broadly consultative bodies where stakeholders, from business leaders to
587: township dwellers to NGO representatives to old apartheid government
588: bureaucrats, met to discuss how to transform a particular government function
589: or industrial sector and bring services to the people in keeping with emerging
590: democratic principles.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The
591: legitimacy of the forums rested precisely in the fact that they took place
592: outside the regular channels of the old government.<span style="mso-spacerun:
593: yes"> </span>At the same time, the government felt compelled to
594: participate in the forums because any policy government might undertake risked
595: being vetted by the anti-apartheid alliance through strikes and street action
596: if it proceeded without agreement from the forums.<span style="mso-spacerun:
597: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
598:
599: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
600: style='font-family:Times'>The forums both institutionalized the anti-apartheid
601: alliance's efforts to thwart the apartheid government's policy options in a
602: great many areas of economic and social life, and instilled the principles of
603: participatory democracy in all aspects of political life.<span
604: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Representing the direct antithesis to
605: apartheid authoritarianism, the forums embodied a post-1990 manifestation of
606: the UDF/labor/civics program of multiracial participatory democracy and served
607: as a crucible for the emergence of more focused civil society organizations
608: attentive to particular issue domains.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
609: </span>This was a bit of a mixed bag for the ANC, whose exiles and prisoners
610: returned to take up most of the leadership positions in the newly legalized
611: organization, and who believed that the internal anti-apartheid organizations,
612: perceived as ANC proxies, should now move aside.<span style="mso-spacerun:
613: yes"> </span>The forums were clearly of great political benefit to the ANC
614: in the early 1990s when it was making the arduous transition from an exiled
615: liberation movement to a political party and needed every edge in sparring with
616: a clearly better prepared National Party/South African government.<span
617: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But participatory democracy and the
618: culture of transparency and consultation were almost as out of step with the
619: political inclinations of the ANC exiles, who tended toward statism and a
620: leaders-know-best style, as they were with the apartheid government.<span
621: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The civil society activist groups that
622: energized the stakeholder forums, though intimately allied with the ANC and
623: often a source of expertise for it, in many instances also served as a brake on
624: the discretion and some of the proclivities of the ANC leadership.<span
625: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
626:
627: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
628:
629: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'><u>Broadcast
630: reform</u><o:p></o:p></span></p>
631:
632: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'>These
633: dynamics were initially seen in the reform of broadcasting, the first major
634: state-owned enterprise and state-dominated sector to undergo structural
635: transformation.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The future of
636: broadcasting was a major focus of anti-apartheid civil society groups, in part
637: because the SABC was such a hated institution, but also because of the
638: homologous relationships among a free, open, and accessible mass media, the
639: culture of consultation and transparency, and the practice of participatory
640: democracy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
641:
642: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
643: style='font-family:Times'>Civil society-based campaigns mobilized public debate
644: on broadcasting through various conferences, seminars, and protest actions, and
645: succeeded in driving the debate toward the acceptance of the idea of a
646: transformed SABC as a non-partisan, independent public broadcaster.<span
647: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The apartheid government earlier had
648: initiated a reform effort in broadcasting through a government commission (see
649: Republic of South Africa, 1991b).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
650: </span>Fearing unilateral government action to "marketize"
651: broadcasting in the guise of reforming the SABC along the lines of global best
652: practices, and watching the apartheid government surreptitiously commence the
653: privatization of broadcasting through quiet radio license grants to favored
654: white consitutencies, the ANC-aligned civil society media groups pushed the ANC
655: leadership to demand that broadcasting be directly taken up in the main
656: political negotiations, the Convention for a Democratic South Africa [CODESA]
657: (Louw, 1993).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Because both the
658: National Party and the ANC saw the question of the control of broadcasting as
659: crucial in the election to come and in the political dispensation to follow,
660: both parties assented.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In the
661: ensuing compromise at CODESA, both the National Party and the ANC agreed to an
662: impartial public broadcaster overseen by an independent regulatory authority as
663: the most viable, if a second best, policy option.<span style="mso-spacerun:
664: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
665:
666: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
667: style='font-family:Times'>The drafting of the Independent Broadcasting
668: Authority Act was then in effect handed over to the "experts"
669: attached to the major political parties.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
670: </span>The principal political players had many more immediate questions of
671: political structure to settle at CODESA.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
672: </span>This gave a remarkable leeway to some of the activists in the
673: ANC-aligned civil society media groups in the writing of the draft broadcast
674: legislation.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Rejecting international
675: market liberal broadcast practices and borrowing progressive features of
676: communication law from several countries, they wrote draft legislation
677: establishing the public broadcaster as the anchor of a mixed system of public,
678: commercial, and community broadcasting.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
679: </span>Public service obligations were to be shared by all broadcasters, with
680: substantial local content requirements and tough cross-media limitations to
681: ensure the diversity of ownership and voices.<span style="mso-spacerun:
682: yes"> </span>The draft legislation and subsequent law, the Independent
683: Broadcasting Authority Act (Republic of South Africa, 1993b), stipulated that
684: applicants for new commercial broadcast licenses demonstrate substantial
685: evidence of the inclusion of the black majority in the ownership and operation
686: of those enterprises.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The future
687: domain of commercial broadcasting could not be exclusively white.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
688:
689: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
690: style='font-family:Times'>I call these principles post-social democratic, in
691: that they endeavored to create a mixed public-private broadcast system with a
692: substantial non-state and non-commodified presence built into the system's
693: structure.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Both state broadcasting
694: and commercial broadcasting, for all their differences, were understood by the
695: civil society media groups to render citizens passive and uninformed.<span
696: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Even traditional public service broadcasting
697: often displays a tendency toward cultural and big-city hegemony, a tendency
698: that was felt to be inappropriate for a new South Africa.<span
699: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The model of broadcasting embodied in
700: the IBA Act sought to avoid the worst aspects of both market and state controls
701: in broadcasting, while pragmatically placing market forces and public forms in
702: a hoped-for creative tension.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The
703: triumph of the model rested in no small measure on the fortuitous fact of the
704: deadlocked negotiated struggle between the ANC and the National Party,
705: representing, in caricature, state versus market.<span style="mso-spacerun:
706: yes"> </span>This created a space for the effective intervention of civil
707: society media groups and their post-social democratic vision.</span><span
708: style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Times;mso-text-raise:3.0pt'> </span><span
709: style='font-family:Times'><span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This is
710: not to oversimplify the ANC's position on broadcasting and media policy.<span
711: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Like the tripartite alliance itself,
712: there were many tendencies.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The
713: official ANC Media Charter (African National Congress, 1992: 67-71) clearly was
714: consonant with the general aims of the civil society media groups (though the
715: charter was a general manifesto and not a concrete policy blueprint).<span
716: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Moreover, the civil society media
717: groups did not stand apart from the ANC, but were constituents internal to the
718: alliance.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But there <u>was</u>
719: also an important faction in the ANC supportive of the idea of state
720: broadcasting, notwithstanding the Media Charter.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
721:
722: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
723: style='font-family:Times'>With the general structure set, the political battles
724: in broadcast policy shifted somewhat after the 1994 election from one that
725: pitted the ANC against the National Party to a struggle within the ANC alliance
726: over the size of the SABC station holdings -- a complicated question not
727: reducible to the conflict between statist versus post-social democratic
728: visions, but nonetheless with clear elements thereof.<span style="mso-spacerun:
729: yes"> </span>Many supported a large SABC because of the need to deliver
730: broadcast programming to all South Africans and in the eleven official
731: languages.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But others supported a
732: large SABC because they still at bottom conceived the public broadcaster as,
733: essentially, a state broadcaster.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
734: </span>And with the top leadership of the SABC in the hands of trusted ANC
735: comrades, many felt that the public broadcaster should remain expansive.<span
736: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>At the very least, many proponents of
737: the large SABC portfolio flirted with the "developmental" theory of
738: the media, in which the media are to augment and assist, not criticize and
739: disparage, governmental efforts at reconstruction and nation-building (see
740: Siebert, Peterson & Schramm, 1956; McQuail, 1987).<span
741: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The SABC was conceived as a cardinal
742: ally in the nation-building project.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
743: </span>The SABC itself lobbied heavily for a large portfolio but envisioned the
744: broadcast system, particularly in television, as essentially
745: market-driven.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Anticipating --
746: correctly -- that little money would come from government, the SABC planned for
747: two of its television channels to become commercial, and would cross-subsidize
748: the third, public service channel with their proceeds.<span
749: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In contrast, those who argued for a
750: smaller SABC portfolio, including the Independent Broadcasting Authority and
751: several of the civil society media groups, fought for a leaner SABC better able
752: to concentrate on its public service mission, and for more opportunities for
753: new broadcast innovators -- including private commercial broadcasters
754: --particularly at the regional or provincial level.<span style="mso-spacerun:
755: yes"> </span>But, they argued, public service obligations and local
756: content requirements should be imposed on <u>all</u> broadcasters so as to
757: establish an overall public service broadcast <u>system</u>, rather than to
758: ghettoize public broadcasting as the sole responsibility of the SABC.<span
759: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
760:
761: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
762: style='font-family:Times'>Party politics did not disappear from the debate over
763: the size of SABC's portfolio, and their dynamics played a major factor in the
764: debate's resolution.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Because the
765: National Party had consistently strived to diminish the power of the SABC after
766: 1994 (which included a constant and malignant public denigration of the new
767: SABC as the ANC's mouthpiece) and to create more space for private
768: broadcasters, the ANC's instinctual political response was to protect the
769: public broadcaster and bolster its portfolio.<span style="mso-spacerun:
770: yes"> </span>The civil society media groups had almost nothing in common
771: with the National Party's market-based broadcast policy vision, but they found
772: themselves on the same side of the SABC portfolio fight.<span
773: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This would prove to be a factor in the
774: distancing of the ANC leadership from the civil society media
775: organizations.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>With the ANC
776: leading the way, Parliament rejected the recommendation that the SABC portfolio
777: be trimmed from three television channels to two (Republic of South Africa,
778: 1995a).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Parliament restored some
779: of the radio stations to the portfolio as well.<span style="mso-spacerun:
780: yes"> </span>A large SABC was seen as necessary to do its part in the
781: tasks of reconstruction and nation-building.<span style="mso-spacerun:
782: yes"> </span>Here, however, the dismal budget situation inherited from
783: the last white government doomed even the positive feature of this vision.<span
784: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>With housing, education, and health
785: care desperately in need of public monies, and with a sizeable portion of the
786: budget precommitted to honoring state pensions as per the transition
787: agreements, the government declined to allocate funds to an institution that <u>had</u>
788: a proven source of funding.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
789: </span>Advertising for decades had constituted the primary source of SABC's
790: funding, and under the new ANC-led government it would continue to do so.<span
791: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But the reliance on advertising to fund
792: SABC's three television channels and numerous radio stations could only pit the
793: SABC's public service mission against its desperate need for revenue, thus
794: reinforcing the commercializing dynamic in broadcasting found worldwide (see,
795: among others, Dyson and Humphreys, 1990).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
796: </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
797:
798: <p class=MsoBodyTextIndent3><span style='font-weight:normal'>The basic
799: structure of the post-apartheid broadcast system embodied a post-social
800: democratic cast.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But,
801: paradoxically, the combination of the transition agreements and the ANC's
802: statist tendency served to reinforce the power of the market in South African
803: broadcasting.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>As part of the
804: post-1994 general policy to adjust the tiers of the broadcast system,
805: Government sold six SABC radio stations to private bidders.<span
806: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But the proceeds of the privatization,
807: about R500 million, went to the central fiscus, not to the SABC.<span
808: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The SABC was forced to downsize.<span
809: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>It shed 1400 jobs and outsourced all
810: but core news and current affairs programming (often to ANC-linked black
811: empowerment media companies).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In a
812: strange bit of historical irony, the old broadcast policy formulations of the
813: last apartheid government returned in new guise.<span style="mso-spacerun:
814: yes"> </span>Government and the SABC proposed splitting the SABC into
815: commercial and public service wings, with the commercial channels subsidizing
816: the public service ones, and holding out the possible future privatization of
817: the commercial channels (Republic of South Africa, 1998).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
818:
819: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
820: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
821:
822: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'><u>Telecommunications</u><o:p></o:p></span></p>
823:
824: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'>In
825: telecommunications a slightly different set of forces came to bear on the
826: process of reform, though the overall political dynamic closely resembled that
827: of broadcasting.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Like
828: broadcasting, telecommunications were targeted for liberalization and
829: privatization by the last white government (see Republic of South Africa,
830: 1989).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The apartheid government's
831: hope to privatize South Africa's telecommunications parastatal (the term for
832: state-owned enterprises) was widely interpreted as a gambit to maintain white
833: control in the event of a future black majority government.<span
834: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The effort was defeated by labor
835: opposition and the ANC's threat to renationalize, but the government did manage
836: to pass a more limited reform bill in 1991, whose provisions generally
837: comported with the worldwide trend in telecommunications policy.<span
838: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Telecommunications were separated from
839: posts, and the ministry would no longer operate the telecommunications
840: parastatal.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Parliament created a
841: new telecommunications company, Telkom, that, though state-owned, was expected
842: to behave like a normal, private corporation (Republic of South Africa,
843: 1991a).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But the legislation did
844: not, and given the overall politics of the transition period, could not, create
845: a comprehensive policy for the sector.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
846: </span>A stakeholder forum failed to coalesce in telecommunications until 1994,
847: and this meant that there was no arena in which the major players could engage
848: in debate and negotiate new policy during the transition years.<span
849: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The upshot was that the environment
850: within which Telkom was to operate was left undefined.<span
851: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>As a consequence, telecommunications
852: policy served as a flashpoint between the ANC alliance and the government
853: between 1990 and the 1994 election.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
854: </span>Amidst great controversy, the government licensed two cellular telephone
855: providers in 1993.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But to gain the
856: ANC alliance's acquiescence, one of the licensees had to include a substantial
857: percentage of black shareholding.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
858: </span>The cellular deal initiated an important pattern in black economic
859: empowerment and the deracialization of the economy, where state tenders and
860: contracts are used to foster private black capital.<span style="mso-spacerun:
861: yes"> </span>Another consequence of the cellular story was that the rapid
862: introduction and success of cellular telephony provided real-world evidence --
863: especially to ANC leaders -- that competition could be beneficial.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
864:
865: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
866: style='font-family:Times'>Following the 1994 election and the formation of a
867: Government of National Unity led by the ANC, Pallo Jordan, the new (ANC)
868: Minister of Posts, Telecommunications and Broadcasting initiated a
869: GreenPaper/White Paper policy process.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
870: </span>Jordan's initiative institutionalized and gave government blessing to
871: the broad consultative policy-making processes that had been the hallmark of
872: the internal anti-apartheid movement and were reinscribed in the stakeholder
873: forums.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The National
874: Telecommunications Policy Project (NTPP), the mechanism created to carry out Jordan’s
875: policy initiative, clearly represented some version of corporatism, but
876: participation was general and open, not restricted to large, powerful
877: institutional stakeholders, typical of classical corporatism.<span
878: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Another distinguishing feature was that
879: for much of the process government played a rather circumspect role.<span
880: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Government was there, in the personage
881: of Minister Jordan, initiating the process, selecting (in consultation with the
882: newly formed telecommunications stakeholder forum, the National Telecommunications
883: Forum) the persons to facilitate it, and providing very general policy
884: guidelines.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The broad policy
885: guidelines essentially followed the election results (a 62.6% ANC victory) and
886: the compromises of the political transition: commit the sector fundamentally
887: toward the provision of telecommunications service to the previously
888: disadvantaged while providing the kinds of sophisticated services to business
889: that are essential to economic growth and job creation.<span
890: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But for the most part government was not
891: directly active in the telecommunications reform process, in part because
892: Minister Jordan did not trust his own bureaucracy (another instance where the
893: political transition agreements protecting the apartheid civil service had
894: consequences), in part because he was committed to deliberative democracy.<span
895: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Jordan evidently believed a better
896: policy result would come from the structured interaction of public and open
897: negotiations among stakeholders. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
898:
899: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
900: style='font-family:Times'>In this regard the telecommunications reform process
901: followed the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP), the tripartite
902: alliance's post-apartheid political-economic policy framework, in both spirit
903: and in deed.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The RDP document,
904: pressed upon a somewhat reluctant ANC by its COSATU and South African Communist
905: Party alliance partners, the civics, and other civil society organizations,
906: called for the direct inclusion of civil society in policy-making, and
907: conceived the new democratic state as a social power that would facilitate, at
908: the minimum, Keynesian-based economic development directed toward the previously
909: disadvantaged.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The RDP document
910: explicitly directed the new government to work with the stakeholder forums
911: (African National Congress, 1994: 120-121).<span style="mso-spacerun:
912: yes"> </span>Reflecting the political and economic orientation of the
913: RDP, Minister Jordan's National Telecommunications Policy Project consisted of
914: an open, consultative set of discussions and negotiations conducted largely
915: within the realm of civil society, and wherein the principle of universal
916: service stood at the core.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In the
917: struggle to reform South African telecommunications a homology could be
918: identified between the goal to equalize access to information and communication
919: embodied in the commitment to universal service, and the understanding of
920: democracy as, in part, expanding the number of active participants in the
921: process of public deliberation and expanding the social basis of communication
922: generally.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Like the broadcasting
923: struggle, the post-social democratic effort to reform telecommunications
924: displayed a kind of Deweyan pragmatism, where democracy was both a goal and a
925: means. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
926:
927: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
928: style='font-family:Times'>The first phase of the stakeholder reform process in
929: telecommunications resulted in a set of politically and technically viable
930: compromises embodied in the White Paper on Telecommunications Policy, in which
931: Telkom was given a limited period of exclusivity to meet extensive network
932: expansion obligations.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The White
933: Paper plotted a sectoral liberalization in which various service markets would
934: be gradually opened to competition at explicit time intervals over a period of
935: six years.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>A strong independent
936: regulatory body, the South African Telecommunications Regulatory Authority, or
937: SATRA, was to oversee the sector generally, license new entrants and administer
938: the liberalization timetable, and settle the inevitable disputes that would
939: result from bold policy reform.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>As
940: in broadcasting, new business entrants in telecommunications would be expected
941: to include the previously disadvantaged in ownership and operation as a
942: condition of licensing (Republic of South Africa, 1996b).<span
943: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The telecommunications White Paper thus
944: envisioned another mixed system in which state and market forces were balanced
945: against each other in a hoped-for creative tension to expand service, and in
946: which a timed liberalization would abet black entrepreneurship.<span
947: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Telkom, the large and dominant
948: state-owned telecommunications provider, was reaffirmed as the sector's main
949: actor, but conditions for contestability and accountability were established at
950: several junctures and explicit provisions for competition were written into the
951: policy document.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The
952: liberalization timetable was to be fixed in legislation so as to build
953: certainty into transformation and elicit "buy-in" from the sector's
954: players.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>SATRA's independence was
955: to guard against improper ministerial interference.<span style="mso-spacerun:
956: yes"> </span>The establishment of a Universal Service Agency represented
957: an additional institutional check to keep SATRA's attention focused on the
958: universal service goal.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Universal
959: service, of course, meant the obligatory expansion of telecommunications
960: service to blacks and to historically black geographic areas (see Horwitz,
961: 1997).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
962:
963: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
964: style='font-family:Times'>It was the stakeholders who essentially hammered out
965: the telecommunications White Paper, but they did so within a tightly
966: prestructured political framework established by the electoral victory of the
967: ANC and the policy environment fabricated by the RDP.<span style="mso-spacerun:
968: yes"> </span>This was why even the white business interests had to
969: embrace universal service as the fundamental orientation of the reform effort.<span
970: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The central sticking point was whether
971: Telkom should remain entirely state-owned or whether some portion of its equity
972: could be sold to an international telecommunications operator.<span
973: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This issue highlighted tensions within
974: the tripartite alliance, as labor had proclaimed a no privatization stance and
975: insisted upon separate discussions with government regarding the disposition of
976: state assets as a general policy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
977: </span>Yet without some large infusion of capital and new management skills,
978: Telkom would not be able to succeed in the fundamental mission to expand telecommunications
979: service to blacks.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Government
980: reentered the politics of telecommunications reform in a direct fashion when
981: Cabinet considered the White Paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
982: </span>Here, like the space created by the stalemated negotiations between the
983: ANC and National Party in the broadcast arena earlier, the divided nature of
984: the Government of National Unity Cabinet actually eased the acceptance of the
985: telecommunications White Paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
986: </span>The ANC alliance could support the White Paper because it retained the
987: state-owned Telkom as the key player in a sector reoriented toward the delivery
988: of universal service; the National Party could support the White Paper because
989: it plotted the opening of the sector to competition.<span style="mso-spacerun:
990: yes"> </span>Indeed, the fact that the National Party strongly backed
991: competition made it politically difficult for those market-oriented ANC cabinet
992: ministers to side with the NP against the central thrust of the White
993: Paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The fact that the White
994: Paper came to Cabinet under the general imprimatur of the RDP meant that its civil
995: society - stakeholder consultation pedigree had to command respect from the
996: ANC, even from those who quietly wished for more extensive privatization and a
997: quicker path to competition.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>And
998: that was important, as was soon to be underscored when telecommunications
999: reform entered into a second phase.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
1000: </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1001:
1002: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
1003: style='font-family:Times'>Soon after the publication of the telecommunications
1004: White Paper in March, 1996, general political dynamics shifted.<span
1005: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In short succession, the government
1006: closed the RDP ministry and replaced Pallo Jordan with Jay Naidoo as minister
1007: of Posts, Telecommunications and Broadcasting.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1008: yes"> </span>Parliament passed the final version of the Constitution and
1009: the National Party announced its withdrawal from the Government of National Unity.<span
1010: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Economic performance had been generally
1011: disappointing, and in 1996 the currency fell in value.<span
1012: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The ANC replaced the RDP with the more
1013: orthodox Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) macroeconomic policy, and
1014: turned away from the politics of consultation.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1015: yes"> </span>The turn away from consultation manifested itself in the
1016: telecommunications arena with the reassertion of ministerial authority.<span
1017: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The Minister substantially altered the
1018: language of the draft legislation on telecommunications policy.<span
1019: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The bill Minister Naidoo brought to
1020: Parliament removed the White Paper's liberalization timetable in favor of
1021: ministerial discretion, and diminished the functions and independence of
1022: SATRA.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The new draft elevated the
1023: role of the ministry in the substantive regulation of the sector.<span
1024: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Just as the White Paper had been
1025: written under the political imprimatur of the RDP, the telecommunications <u>bill</u>
1026: was written under the political imprimatur of the GEAR.<span
1027: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>GEAR comprised a largely orthodox
1028: macroeconomic policy of deficit reduction and fiscal and monetary discipline. <span
1029: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>GEAR paid strict attention to the
1030: budgetary implications of government-delivered services.<span
1031: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Parastatals should not lose money;
1032: indeed, they could be a new source of revenue through privatization (Republic
1033: of South Africa, 1996a).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>GEAR was
1034: predicated on the assumption, following the "Washington consensus" on
1035: economic policy, that if the government demonstrated its credibility to such
1036: discipline, private investment, particularly direct foreign investment, would
1037: materialize.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>To pull GEAR off, the
1038: ANC leadership, again following the Washington consensus script, insulated the
1039: politics of GEAR's adoption from participatory democratic structures.<span
1040: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1041:
1042: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
1043: style='font-family:Times'>The changes to the telecommunications White Paper
1044: were consonant with the spirit and timing of the government's adoption of GEAR
1045: and reflected the move toward centralizing power in the now ANC-identified
1046: government.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The telecommunications
1047: bill's reassertion of ministerial control gave Minister Naidoo more flexibility
1048: in the search for a partner for Telkom (an ability to trade a higher sale price
1049: for greater concessions on exclusivity) and more leeway to bring labor and
1050: black economic empowerment groups into an overall settlement.<span
1051: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>This had its desired effect.<span
1052: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>With the muted acquiescence of COSATU,
1053: the government was able to sell a 30 percent stake of Telkom to an
1054: international telecommunications consortium of SBC Communications and Telekom
1055: Malaysia.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Government held out
1056: another 10 percent of Telkom for black economic empowerment.<span
1057: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Of the $1.2 billion the consortium paid
1058: for the 30 percent stake, $1 billion was to stay in the telecommunications
1059: sector.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1060:
1061: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
1062: style='font-family:Times'>The contest over the independence of SATRA assumed
1063: outsized importance because it represented a fight over the power of the state
1064: in the new South Africa.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>At this
1065: stage in South Africa's evolution, so went the argument, there was a need for
1066: the government to direct the telecommunications sector toward addressing
1067: "the imbalances of the past."<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
1068: </span>The position had some salience, particularly given the long fear that
1069: SATRA might be captured by the old white business interests.<span
1070: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>But the alignment of the ministry and
1071: black economic empowerment groups in the effort to weaken SATRA pointed to
1072: something more: the general ANC political strategy represented by GEAR, which
1073: was to increase the power of the state and use the state for development by way
1074: of establishing patronage for a politically loyal black bourgeoisie through
1075: selected privatizations, tenders, and contracts.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1076: yes"> </span>In the end, this gambit in telecommunications was turned back
1077: to some degree through the interplay of deal-making in coalition party
1078: politics.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The final legislation
1079: reinscribed many of the elements of the White Paper, including the restoration
1080: of some independence to SATRA.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The
1081: appearance, if not the reality, of a stronger, SATRA resuscitated the
1082: post-social democratic vision that was attached to the telecommunications White
1083: Paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1084:
1085: <p class=MsoBodyText2><span style='font-family:Times'>The telecommunications
1086: reform process was full of small paradoxes.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1087: yes"> </span>It was the ANC that, after both consolidating power and
1088: finding government relatively helpless before the decline in the value of the
1089: currency in early 1996, moved to embrace significant features of the Washington
1090: consensus and the "TINA" discourse.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1091: yes"> </span>It was labor and the civil society media groups that
1092: effectively modified the government's position in the telecommunications policy
1093: arena.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Labor's unyielding demand
1094: for universal service essentially succeeded in framing the discourse in the
1095: telecommunications reform process.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
1096: </span>At the same time, labor's seemingly retrogressive stance favoring a
1097: state monopoly in telecommunications had a paradoxically progressive
1098: effect.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In the context of
1099: business' call for immediate privatization, liberalization, and competition (a
1100: position also promoted endlessly by the EU, the US, and the WTO), labor's
1101: position forced a political compromise that maintained a strong Telkom as an
1102: interim exclusive service provider and established a timetable for
1103: liberalization -- all within the discourse of universal service.<span
1104: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Yet it was COSATU's membership in the
1105: tripartite alliance that enabled the ANC government to secure labor's
1106: acquiescence on the privatization question and to put forward an offer on
1107: telecommunications to the World Trade Organization.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1108: yes"> </span>To complete the series of compromises, labor and civil
1109: society pressure undoubtedly played a role in keeping the proceeds of
1110: privatization connected to social needs.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
1111: </span>One billion US dollars were pumped into the sector to contribute to
1112: universal service -- not diverted for general deficit reduction as had been
1113: explicitly envisioned in an early planning document on the disposition of state
1114: assets and was implicit in the GEAR macroeconomic strategy (see Cameron, 1995;
1115: Republic of South Africa, 1995b).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1116:
1117: <p class=MsoBodyText2><span style='font-family:Times'>And although the basic
1118: telecommunications policy has not been without problems – among other
1119: things, Telkom has engaged in heavy-handed assertions of its exclusivity,
1120: attempting to thwart the growth of independent Internet service providers and
1121: value-added networks – the company has succeeded in expanding main lines
1122: at nearly a 30 percent rate per annum .<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
1123: </span>In contrast, in the years prior to the 1996 Telecommunications Act,
1124: Telkom had built out the network at about a 5 percent rate (Telkom, 2000).<span
1125: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Government has moved forward on the
1126: liberalization front.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>A third cellular
1127: operator – with 40 percent ownership from previously disadvantaged
1128: communities in a consortium with Saudi Oger – was awarded a license in
1129: early 2001.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In August, Government
1130: authorized the licensing in 2002 of a second full-service national public switched
1131: telecommunications operator, with a third operator possible in 2005 (Republic
1132: of South Africa, 2001).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1133:
1134: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
1135: style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1136:
1137: <h2 style='text-indent:0in'><span style='font-family:Times'>Toward a conclusion<o:p></o:p></span></h2>
1138:
1139: <p class=MsoNormal style='line-height:24.0pt'><span style='font-family:Times'>I
1140: have characterized the reform of broadcasting and telecommunications in South
1141: Africa as an example of negotiated liberalization.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1142: yes"> </span>The reform of South African communications proceeded by way
1143: of a complex set of compromises among the state, political parties, labor, and
1144: civil society groups through remarkably open forms of participation in
1145: policy-making.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>The resulting
1146: communication institutions were largely accountable both to the new democratic
1147: polity and to the norms of global markets, and embodied what I have called a
1148: post-social democratic vision.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
1149: </span>What perhaps marks the South African example as unique is that such
1150: policy-making exercises took place in the context of a strong labor movement
1151: (with union density at about 50%, far greater than most labor movements in
1152: countries transitioning to democracy), an energized and intellectually acute
1153: set of civil society organizations, and a strong culture of consultation and
1154: transparency that derived from the internal mass democratic anti-apartheid
1155: movement.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Although I have
1156: highlighted the importance of civil society in this exercise in policy-making,
1157: it was not a matter of civil society activism per se.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1158: yes"> </span>Successful civil society struggle depends on a state open to
1159: such interventions.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Participatory
1160: politics works when the state is hospitable to such politics.<span
1161: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In the 1990-1994 period the state was
1162: open because it was in fundamental transition and was being continually
1163: contested; in the 1994-1996 period the state was open because of the way that
1164: the Reconstruction and Development Programme embodied the sometimes politically
1165: conflicted, but in the larger sense politically complementary aims of the
1166: tripartite alliance, in particular the accommodation of the stakeholder forums
1167: and other forms of participatory democracy.<span style="mso-spacerun:
1168: yes"> </span>In other words, effective civil society participation needs
1169: both strong state and viable, hospitable points of political entry (see Evans,
1170: 1997).<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1171:
1172: <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:22.0pt;line-height:24.0pt'><span
1173: style='font-family:Times'>The success of the South African communication sector
1174: reforms, while notable, should not be taken to mean that such negotiated or
1175: bargained liberalization is easy.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">
1176: </span>The constraints and development paths established by globalization are,
1177: if not iron-clad, nonetheless indisputable and powerful.<span
1178: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>As has been suggested, the ANC-led
1179: government has moved toward rather orthodox macroeconomic policies to
1180: accommodate these constraints, much to the dismay of its labor and communist
1181: party alliance partners (see, e.g., Marais, 1998).<span style="mso-spacerun:
1182: yes"> </span>Moreover, the ANC’s reconstruction project often
1183: flirts with a version of political clientelism, via the processes of
1184: privatization, state tender awards, and black economic empowerment.<span
1185: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Labor has not been particularly
1186: successful in its interventions in macroeconomic issues such as exchange
1187: controls and tariff reforms in recent South African policy.<span
1188: style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Still, as Webster & Adler (1999)
1189: suggest and the communications reform process illustrates, movements resisting
1190: liberalization may be able to create new institutions through which they
1191: process their demands.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>In turn,
1192: these institutions may be able to create new rules of the game, allowing a kind
1193: of bargained liberalization in which prominent groups renegotiate the terms on
1194: which a country engages with the global economy, establishing a new balance
1195: between market and society, and even, perhaps, pointing toward a new class
1196: compromise.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1197:
1198: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1199:
1200: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1201:
1202: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1203:
1204: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1205:
1206: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1207:
1208: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1209:
1210: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Adler, Glenn, and Eddie
1211: Webster. 1995. "Challenging Transition Theory: The Labor Movement, Radical
1212: Reform, and Transition to Democracy in South Africa." <u>Politics &
1213: Society</u> 23: 75-106.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1214:
1215: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1216:
1217: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Adler, Glenn, and Eddie
1218: Webster. Eds. 2000. <u>Trade Unions and Democratization in South Africa,
1219: 1985-1997</u>. New York: St. Martins Press. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
1220:
1221: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1222:
1223: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>African National Congress.
1224: 1992. <u>ANC Policy Guidelines For a Democratic South Africa</u>. (Adopted at
1225: National Conference). Johannesburg: author, May 28-31.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1226:
1227: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1228:
1229: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>African National Congress.
1230: 1994. <u>The Reconstruction and Development Programme: A Policy Framework</u>.
1231: Johannesburg: Umanyano Publications.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1232:
1233: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1234:
1235: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Baskin, Jeremy. 1991. <u>Striking
1236: Back: A History of Cosatu</u>. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1237:
1238: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1239:
1240: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Baskin, Jeremy, ed. 1994. <u>Unions
1241: in Transition: COSATU at the Dawn of Democracy</u>. Johannesburg: National
1242: Labour & Economic Development Institute.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1243:
1244: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1245:
1246: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Cameron, Bruce. 1995.
1247: "Cabinet Guide to Privatisation Held Back." <u>Cape Times</u>, June
1248: 29.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1249:
1250: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1251:
1252: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Dyson, Kenneth, and Peter
1253: Humphreys, eds. 1990. <u>The Political Economy of Communications: International
1254: and European Dimensions</u>. London: Routledge.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1255:
1256: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1257:
1258: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Evans, Peter, ed. 1997.<u>
1259: State-Society Synergy: Government and Social Capital in Development</u>.
1260: Research Series/ No. 94. Berkeley: International and Area Studies.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1261:
1262: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1263:
1264: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Haggard, Stephan, and Robert
1265: R. Kaufman. 1995. <u>The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions</u>.
1266: Princeton: Princeton University Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1267:
1268: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1269:
1270: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Horwitz, Robert B. 1997.
1271: "Telecommunications Policy in the New South Africa: Participatory Politics
1272: and Sectoral Reform." <u>Media, Culture & Society</u> 19: 503-533.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1273:
1274: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1275:
1276: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Horwitz, Robert B. 2001. <u>Communication
1277: and Democratic Reform in South Africa</u>. New York: Cambridge University
1278: Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1279:
1280: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1281:
1282: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Louw, P. Eric. ed. 1993. <u>South
1283: African Media Policy: Debates of the 1990s</u>. Bellville: Anthropos.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1284:
1285: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1286:
1287: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Marais, Hein. 1998. <u>South
1288: Africa, Limits to Change: The Political Economy of Transition</u>. London: Zed
1289: Books; Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1290:
1291: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1292:
1293: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>McQuail, Denis. 1987. <u>Mass
1294: Communication Theory: An Introduction</u>. second ed. London: Sage.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1295:
1296: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1297:
1298: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>O'Donnell, Guillermo, and
1299: Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986. <u>Transitions From Authoritarian Rule: Tentative
1300: Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies</u>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
1301: University Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1302:
1303: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1304:
1305: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Przeworski, Adam. 1991. <u>Democracy
1306: and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin
1307: America</u>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1308:
1309: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1310:
1311: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Przeworski, Adam, et al.
1312: 1995. <u>Sustainable Democracy</u>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1313:
1314: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1315:
1316: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1317: 1989. <u>Summarized Report on the Study by Dr. W.J. de Villiers Concerning the
1318: Strategy, Policy, Control Structure and Organisation of Posts and
1319: Telecommunications</u>. Pretoria: Government Printer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1320:
1321: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1322:
1323: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1324: 1991a. <u>Post Office Amendment Act</u> (Act No. 85 of 1991). Pretoria:
1325: Government Printer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1326:
1327: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1328:
1329: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1330: 1991b. Task Group on Broadcasting in South and Southern Africa. <u>Report of
1331: the Task Group on Broadcasting in South and Southern Africa</u> (Viljoen
1332: Commission Report). Pretoria: Government Printer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1333:
1334: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1335:
1336: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1337: 1993a. <u>Constitution of the Republic of South Africa</u> (Act No. 200 of
1338: 1993). Cape Town: Government Printer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1339:
1340: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1341:
1342: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1343: 1993b. <u>Independent Broadcasting Authority Act</u> (Act No. 153 of 1993).
1344: Cape Town: Government Printer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1345:
1346: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1347:
1348: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1349: 1995a. Independent Broadcasting Authority. <u>Report on the Protection and
1350: Viability of Public Broadcasting Services; Cross Media Control of Broadcasting
1351: Services; Local Television Content and South African Music</u> (Triple Inquiry
1352: Report). Johannesburg: IBA.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1353:
1354: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1355:
1356: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1357: 1995b. Ministry of Public Enterprises. "Discussion Document by the
1358: Government of National Unity on the Consultative and Implementation Framework
1359: for the Restructuring of the State Assets." Pretoria: Ministry, July 25.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1360:
1361: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1362:
1363: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1364: 1996a. <u>Growth, Employment and Redistribution: A Macroeconomic Strategy</u>.
1365: Pretoria: Government Printer.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1366:
1367: <p class=MsoHeader style='tab-stops:.5in'><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1368:
1369: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1370: 1996b. Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and Broadcasting. <u>The White
1371: Paper on Telecommunications Policy</u>. Pretoria: Government Printer, March 13.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1372:
1373: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1374:
1375: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South Africa.
1376: 1998. Ministry of Communications. <u>White Paper on Broadcasting Policy</u>. Pretoria:
1377: Government Printer. June.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1378:
1379: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1380:
1381: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Republic of South
1382: Africa.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>2001. <u>Telecommunications
1383: Amendment Bill</u>. Cape Town: Government Printer. August 29.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1384:
1385: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1386:
1387: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Seidman, Gay W. 1994. <u>Manufacturing
1388: Militance: Workers' Movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970-1985</u>. Berkeley:
1389: University of California Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1390:
1391: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1392:
1393: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Siebert, Frederick S.,
1394: Theodore Peterson, and Wilbur Schramm. 1956. <u>Four Theories of the Press:
1395: Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility and Soviet Communist Concepts
1396: of What the Press Should Be and Do</u>. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1397:
1398: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1399:
1400: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Telkom. 2000. <u>Annual
1401: Report</u>, 1999/2000. Pretoria: author.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1402:
1403: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1404:
1405: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Walton, John, and David
1406: Seddon. 1994. <u>Free Markets and Food Riots: The Politics of Global Adjustment</u>.
1407: Oxford: Blackwell.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1408:
1409: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1410:
1411: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Waterbury, John. 1992.
1412: "The Heart of the Matter? Public Enterprise and the Adjustment
1413: Process." In Stephan Haggard and Robert R. Kaufman, eds. <u>The Politics
1414: of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and
1415: the State</u>. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 182-217.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1416:
1417: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1418:
1419: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Waterman, Peter. 1991.
1420: "Social-Movement Unionism: A New Model for a New World." Working
1421: Paper Series No. 110. Institute of Social Studies: The Hague.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1422:
1423: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1424:
1425: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Webster, Edward, and Glenn
1426: Adler. 1999. "Toward a Class Compromise in South Africa's 'Double
1427: Transition': Bargained Liberalization and the Consolidation of Democracy."
1428: <u>Politics & Society</u> 27: 347-385.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1429:
1430: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1431:
1432: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>Williamson, John. 1994.
1433: "In Search of a Manual for Technopols." In John Williamson, ed. <u>The
1434: Political Economy of Policy Reform</u>. Washington, DC: Institute for International
1435: Economics, pp. 11-28.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1436:
1437: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1438:
1439: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'>World Bank. 1995. World Bank
1440: Policy Research Report. <u>Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics
1441: of Government Ownership</u>. New York: Oxford University Press.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
1442:
1443: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1444:
1445: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1446:
1447: <p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:Times'><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></p>
1448:
1449: <p class=MsoNormal><![if !supportEmptyParas]> <![endif]><o:p></o:p></p>
1450:
1451: </div>
1452:
1453: </body>
1454:
1455: </html>
1456: