1: %\documentclass[doublespacing]{elsart
2: \documentclass{elsart}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: %\usepackage{latexsym}
6: %\usepackage{amsfonts}
7: %\usepackage{zed-cm}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: \begin{frontmatter}
11: %\journal{APFA 5}
12: \title{Stylized Facts in Internal Rates of Return\\
13: on Stock Index and its Derivative Transactions}
14: \thanks[footnoteinfo]{Corresponding author.\\
15: Fax: +81-422-33-3286, E-mail: lukas@icu.ac.jp\\}
16:
17: \author{Lukas Pichl,${}^{^{\mbox{\tiny 1,*}}}$ Taisei Kaizoji,${}^{^{\mbox{\tiny 2}}}$ and
18: Takuya Yamano${}^{^{\mbox{\tiny 2}}}$ }
19: \address{%
20: ${}^{^{\mbox{\rm \tiny 1}}}$ Division of Natural Sciences
21: }%
22: \address{%
23: ${}^{^{\mbox{\rm \tiny 2}}}$ Division of Social Sciences\\
24: \hspace*{0mm}\\
25: International Christian University\\
26: Osawa 3-10-2, Mitaka, 181-8585 Japan
27: }%
28: \address{%
29: \rm Received 31 July 2006
30: }%
31:
32: \begin{abstract}
33: Universal features in stock markets and their derivative markets are studied by
34: means of probability distributions in internal rates of return on buy and sell
35: transaction pairs. Unlike the stylized facts in log normalized returns,
36: the probability distributions for such single asset encounters incorporate
37: the time factor by means of the internal rate of return defined as the continuous compound interest.
38: Resulting stylized facts are shown in the probability distributions derived
39: from the daily series of TOPIX, S $\&$ P 500 and FTSE 100 index close values.
40: The application of the above analysis to minute-tick data of NIKKEI 225 and its
41: futures market, respectively, reveals an interesting diffference in the behavior of
42: the two probability distributions, in case a threshold on the minimal duration
43: of the long position is imposed. It is therefore suggested that the probability
44: distributions of the internal rates of return could be used for causality mining
45: between the underlying and derivative stock markets. The highly specific discrete
46: spectrum, which results from noise trader strategies as opposed to the smooth
47: distributions observed for fundamentalist strategies in single encounter
48: transactions may be also useful in deducing the type of investment strategy from trading
49: revenues of small portfolio investors.
50:
51: \end{abstract}
52:
53: \begin{keyword}
54: Universal features; Stylized facts; Returns on strategy; Trend investment;
55: Technical analysis; NIKKEI 225 derivative market
56: \PACS 87.23.Ge \sep 02.50.-r \sep 02.70.Rr
57: \end{keyword}
58: \end{frontmatter}
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61:
62: Stylized facts in market indicator data \cite{s1,s2,s3,s4,s5,s6,s7} have been reported, up to date,
63: especially on the session-to-session basis, such as the fat tail law in the distribution
64: of $R_t\equiv$log($P_i/P_{i-1}$) returns on various time scales and aggregation levels
65: for data $P_i$ at ticks $i=1,..,N$. The reasons for this kind of statistics
66: are well known: the values $P_i$ and $P_{i+1}$ should a priori correlate most strongly;
67: the relative factor $P_i/P_{i-1}$ is suitable for the analysis of market trends; the application
68: of the $\log$ function in addition brings symmetry to the two cases
69: of indicator increase and decrease, while preserving the original meaning of small relative
70: market changes, $\log(1+x)\sim x$ for $|x|<<1$. Finally, it is well established
71: that the histograms of $R$ values are practically symmetric for long-term data series
72: with respect to the inversion of $R\rightarrow-R$, and may universally have
73: fat tails relative to the normal distribution, whcih are known as the stylized facts. This constitutes a strong case
74: for studying indicator data in terms of probability distributions of normalized log
75: returns. Last but not least, the ratio $P_i/P_{i-1}-1$ is the profit
76: (or loss) from buying the asset at session $i$ and selling it at session $i+1$
77: without transaction costs.
78:
79: In this paper, we follow and extend the
80: interpretation of $R_t$ as an elementary transaction (or function) for analyzing the aggregate
81: market data. While the standard indicator, $P_i/P_{i-1}-1$, fixes the single asset encounter
82: period $\Delta i=1$ and allows both for profit and loss, here we allow for a general $\Delta i<N$, determining this duration
83: of the asset encounter as the minimum $i´_0$ of all $i'>i$, for which a required {\sl internal rate
84: of return} is achieved. In the former approach, the computed log return values $R_t$
85: are partitioned into histogram bins to obtain the probability distribution; in the latter one,
86: the probability distribution is obtained directly as the ratio of $i'_0$s, $i'_0<N$. This defines
87: a transform over an interval of fixed internal rates of returns. Because of
88: the exponential behavior of compound interesting, the size of the data sample has no
89: effect on the distributions of internal rate of return (IRR) even for moderate
90: values of $N$. Let us also note that in both cases, the $R$ and IRR values are obtained
91: ex post from index data, and therefore their economic interpretation implicitly
92: assumes no feedback between the virtual transactor and the market. The present approach
93: complements a variety of econometric, econophysics, statistical
94: and artificial intelligence approaches in this field \cite{m1,m2,m3,m4}.
95:
96: Although the case for the use of the normalized log returns and IRR distributions
97: has been presented above, it is worthwhile relating the independent variable of
98: both probability distributions, i.e. the return of a certain transaction, to the
99: ultimate paradigm of market investment, the optimal transaction. The problem of optimal
100: investment \cite{slanina} is also central to financial economics. Both the $R$ and IRR distributions
101: are time probabilities of return on a risky transaction with either two-component
102: portfolio of money and the stock index, or multi-component portfolio of money
103: and particular stock titles for index components. Depending on whether the transaction profit
104: is reinvested or not, the geometric mean or the arithmetic mean of the expected
105: return of single encounter investment should be optimized \cite{bern}. The former
106: case of geometric mean is known as the Kelly criterion \cite{kelly}, which specifies that the optimal
107: single encounter ratio $x$ for one risky asset with return $b$ and probability $p$
108: is $x=p-(1-p)/b$, in order to maximize the expectation value of the logarithm
109: of the single encounter results, i.e. the economics' utility function. This is where
110: the present single asset encounter formulation relates to Shannon's information
111: entropy, and its generalized models.
112:
113: The above proposed IRR formulation ofthe stylized facts in market indicator time series has, in fact,
114: one more important motivation. While the log normalized returns build on the $[i-1,i]$
115: transaction pairs, the internal rate of return is defined for any $[i,i']$ transaction,
116: $0<i<i'<N$, not necessarily restricting to the preset fixed value in the IRR transform above. Thus, given
117: a market and any sort of single-encounter formulated strategy, one obtains an IRR probability
118: spectrum, which can characterize both the market and the strategy.
119:
120:
121: The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 explains the theoretical rationale
122: of the generalized stylized features as a transform in the internal rates of return.
123: The single encounter investment in the continuous interest model is applied to
124: the time series of TOPIX, S $\&$ P 500 and FTSE 100 data, for which the resulting IRR
125: transforms are derived and their stylized features are discussed. In Section 3,
126: the characteristic spectrum of one particular single encounter strategy based
127: on the comparison of short term and long term trends is shown. Section 4 demonstrates both
128: formulations of the stylized facts on the minute-tick data from the NIKKEI 225
129: index, and its futures market, and discusses their causal relation in terms
130: of the IRR transform. We conclude with final remarks in Section 5.
131:
132: \section{Internal Rates of Return - Market Transform}
133:
134: \begin{figure*}
135: \label{fig:f1}
136: \begin{center}
137: \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize]{pichlFig1.eps}
138: \caption{Stylized facts in the IRR transform for three stock indices in the period
139: of 1995/09/01 to 2005/08/30 (daily quotes).}
140: \end{center} % accordingly.
141: \end{figure*}
142:
143: As mentioned above, the stylized facts in indicator time series [3-7] are usually studied by means of log-normalized returns,
144: log($P_i/P_{i-1}$). Let us consider an investment on stock market index (which itself is one of the fundamental types of portfolios)
145: for a variable period of $t$ sessions with a minimal required profit rate $r$ per session. In other words,
146: \begin{equation}
147: \label{term}
148: 0=C_t-\frac{C_0}{(1+r)^t}
149: \end{equation}
150: with an unknown period $t$, cash flow $C_0$ equal to the buying price, and cash flow $C_t$ equal to the selling price.
151: The termination condition for the investment thus requires
152: \begin{equation}
153: P_t\geq P_0(1+r)^t
154: \end{equation}
155: at the smallest possible time $t$ for which the above inequality holds. In economics terms, this would e.g. correspond
156: to the maximal implicit interest rate $r$ of reverse repo operation in the interval $<0,t>$. The required value of $r$ will
157: be the basis of the IRR transform\footnote{Although the fixed $r$-value is a mathematical concept here, it also corresponds
158: to the fundamentalist strategy}.
159:
160: By using the compound discounting across market sessions, and the standard identity
161: $$
162: \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left(1+\frac{a}{n}\right)^n=e^a,
163: $$
164: the termination condition in Eq. (\ref{term}) is equivalent to
165: $$
166: P_t\geq P_0e^{\rho t},
167: $$
168: where $\rho $ is the IRR density in the continuous compound interest model, hereafter
169: the independent variable for the IRR transform. Let us note that in case of $t=1$,
170: the $\rho$ value approximately reduces to the log-normalized return.
171: For any fixed value of $\rho$, there is a certain probability $p(\rho)$ to
172: realize this value in the market, which can be computed for instance
173: by Monte Carlo simulation or a full scan of all data points, $i=1,..,N$, depending
174: on the size of data sample and the required accuracy. The boundary conditions
175: for $p(\rho)$ in standard data samples are $\rho\rightarrow 0 \Rightarrow p \rightarrow 1$,
176: and $\rho\rightarrow\infty \Rightarrow p \rightarrow 0$. For
177: most actual market data, larger values of $\rho$ imply a very rapid decay
178: of $p(\rho)$, because of the exponential explosion in the compound interest function, which cannot match the limited rates of return achievable in the real markets.
179:
180: The quantity $(\rho p(\rho)$ is the expected IRR, and must have a non-trivial local maximum at some point $\rho^*$.
181: Since in general $t\neq 1$, the stylized facts in $I(\rho)\equiv \rho p(\rho)$ are different from
182: the stylized facts in the log normalized returns, which would be $R(\rho)p(\rho)$.
183: More than 30\% of the actual distributions dealt with here are found to correspond to $\Delta t\geq 2$ events.
184:
185: Figure 1 shows such probability distributions for 2458 daily values of three stock indices,
186: TOPIX, S $\&$ P 500 and FTSE 100 for a ten year period. It is interesting to note that
187: the optimal point $\rho^*$ coincides to high accuracy for all three distributions,
188: $\rho^*\sim 0.007$, an unexpected fact even in case when the asymptotic
189: power law exponents were similar. The close similarity of the S$\&$P 500 and FTSE 100
190: distributions, on the other hand, may be rather based on the close ties between
191: the U.S. and the U.K. stock markets. The properties of the IRR transform and its
192: generalizations will also be discussed in Section 4.
193:
194: The empirical distribution $I^*(\rho)$ for TOPIX in Fig. 1 serves as a reference case
195: for the trend investing case discussed in the next section.
196:
197: \section{Internal Rates of Return - Strategy Transform}
198:
199: \begin{figure*}
200: \label{fig:f2}
201: \begin{center}
202: \includegraphics[width=0.8\hsize]{pichlFig2.eps}
203: \caption{Discrete spectrum of the Golden Cross / Dead Cross strategy for
204: the TOPIX data between 1995/09/01 and 2005/08/30 (cf. Fig. 1 for the
205: IRR transform). Upper panel: losses, lower panel: profits. The short-term
206: trend is taken as one week floating average (S=5); the curves
207: show the variance in the spectrum for middle to long term trends
208: defined by 25, 75 and 200 data point averages.}
209: \end{center} % accordingly.
210: \end{figure*}
211:
212: Since the log-normalized returns do not allow for direct evaluation of
213: nontrivial period single encounter strategies, it is interesting
214: to study the spectral projection of such strategies, i.e. the I($\rho$) distribution,
215: within the IRR transform, namely the difference from the reference
216: spectrum $I^{*}(\rho)$ (cf. the curve for TOPIX in Fig. 1). This section discusses
217: the possible benefits of such an approach, and uses the moving average
218: Dead Cross / Golden Cross trend strategy for illustrations.
219:
220: To address the noise trading, we adopt a buy signal / sell signal strategy, which is based on the comparison
221: of short and middle term trends, which is often used as a reference by online brokers and elementary
222: investment handbooks. This approach is based on the comparison of
223: moving averages (MAs),
224: $$
225: P^{MA}(t)=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=0}^{n_{max}-1}P_{t-n},
226: $$
227: in the short-term ($n_{max}=S=5$) and middle-term ($n_{max}=L=25,75,200$) periods.
228:
229: According to the model, a strong bullish market trend is signaled by an intersection of the
230: rising short-term and middle-term curves, a signal to buy. A strong bearish market trend
231: is signaled by an intersection of the falling short and middle term market curves, a
232: signal to sell. These two turning points are routinely referred to as the Golden Cross
233: and the Dead Cross, and are usually associated with analysts' recommendations
234: to buy and sell, respectively. Although the Golden Cross point could be used in connection with
235: some required IRR value, for instance, we assume the investment lasts from the buy to the
236: sell signal, which is consistent e.g. with the period from market bubble formation
237: to its burst. Thus, provided the two signals originate on the opposite sides
238: of a local maximum in the market, an investment between the two turning points
239: may turn profitable. Since both cross points are based on relative criteria, there is
240: no a priori guarantee that the resulting IRR density $I(\rho)$ from such transactions
241: will in fact be positive, in contrast to the case of IRR market transform.
242:
243:
244: The strategy is formalized as follows.
245: Let us denote the daily short-term and middle-term MA time series as
246: $\theta_i$ and $\lambda_i$, respectively, and their difference $\delta_i=\theta_i-\lambda_i$.
247: The investment policy is then determined by the buy and sells signals
248: arising in the market:
249: \begin{itemize}
250: \item Buy: $\Delta_i\times\Delta_{i-1}<0$ (cross), $\lambda_i-\lambda_{i-1}>0$ (bullish long-term trend),
251: $\theta_i-\theta_{i-1}>0$ (bullish short-term trend) and $\theta_i+\lambda_{i-1}-(\theta_{i-1}+\lambda_i)>0$
252: (acceleration of the long-term bullish trend).
253: \item Sell: $\Delta_i\times\Delta_{i-1}<0$ (cross), $\lambda_i\times\lambda_{i-1}<0$ (bearish long-term trend),
254: $\theta_i-\theta_{i-1}<0$ (bearish short-term trend) and $\theta_i+\lambda_{i-1}-(\theta_{i-1}+\lambda_i)<0$
255: (acceleration of the long-term bearish trend).
256: \end{itemize}
257:
258: By using the Monte Carlo computer simulation method, the initial day of investment $i_0$
259: is decided at random between the values $i=1$ and $N$, the size of the data set.
260: Then the data are scanned for $i_0<i\leq N$ until the buy signal is found at some $i=i_b$.
261: The day $i_b$ corresponds to the start of the investment; the data are scanned again,
262: $i_b<i\leq N$, for the reverse signal to terminate the investment at some $i=i_s$.
263: The termination condition defines the respective $\rho$ resulting from each transaction
264: $k$ as
265: $$
266: P_{i^{(k)}_s}/P_{i^{(k)}_b}=\exp(\rho^{(k)}(i^{(k)}_s-i^{(k)}_b)),
267: $$
268: and its relative weight in the contribution to the IRR spectrum is $\rho^{(k)}$.
269:
270: Figure 2 shows the discrete spectrum for the 2458 daily values of the TOPIX index
271: for three periods $L$ defining the middle-term trend. As the length of the middle
272: term increases, the frequency of cross events decreases, and the distribution
273: becomes more singular. The spectrum $I(\rho)$ extends to the negative region of
274: $\rho$. Although the data for the S $\&$ P 500 and FTSE 100 indices are not shown
275: in Fig. 2, their corresponding spectra are also discrete, and specific
276: for each market. However, because of the relatively infrequent cross point events
277: in the data set, the statistics in Fig. 2 is rather qualitative. It is, however,
278: sufficient to support the discrete spectrum findings.
279:
280: \begin{figure*}
281: \label{fig:f3}
282: \begin{center}
283: \includegraphics[width=0.7\hsize]{pichlFig3.eps}
284: \caption{The histogram of log normalized returns of NIKKEI 225 (upper panel)
285: and the difference from the probability distribution in the futures market (lower panel).}
286: \end{center} % accordingly.
287: \end{figure*}
288:
289:
290: \section{IRR Transform and Causality}
291:
292: In this section, the advantages of the normalized log return and
293: the IRR transform of minute-tick data from NIKKEI 225 and its futures market
294: are examined.
295: The data sample is taken between 9:01 on January 4th to 15:05 on June 8th, 2000,
296: which covers most of the first two quartal NIKKEI 225 futures
297: emissions in 2000. The log normalized return distribution for the NIKKEI 225
298: index, and the differences of the futures market from the underlying
299: index are shown in the upper and lower panel of Fig. 3, respectively.
300: Within the statistic of this 29,810 point data sample, the difference
301: of the two $R-$distributions has more than 8 nodes within the FWHM region,
302: sized in the order of up to 10\% of NIKKEI 225 histogram. Although this is
303: certainly an interesting result, there is no straightforward
304: way how to interpret the number of physically relevant nodes
305: in the differential histogram.
306:
307: \begin{figure*}
308: \label{fig:f4}
309: \begin{center}
310: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{pichlFig4.eps}
311: \caption{The IRR transform: (a) The $I(\rho)$ distributions of NIKKEI 225 index for minimal investment
312: periods of $T$=0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 sessions. (b) The difference of $I(\rho)$
313: distributions between the NIKKEI 225 market and its derivative market.}
314: \end{center} % accordingly.
315: \end{figure*}
316:
317:
318: Next, let us proceed to the IRR transform of the NIKKEI 225 index and its futures market
319: data sample. In Fig. 4(a), the $I(\rho)$ distributions obtained with an imposed minimal
320: investment period $\tau$ are shown. Because of the compound interest, it becomes increasingly
321: difficult to maintain a constant IRR density $\rho$ over a prolonged period; therefore
322: the height of the distributions monotonously decreases with $\tau$ increasing in the
323: series of 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 minutes. More interestingly, Fig. 4(b) shows the differences
324: of $I^{(\tau)}(\rho)$ between the index and its futures market for the two probability
325: distribution $\tau$-series. Only in the case of $\tau=0$, there appear two nodes, with the maximum value
326: in the negative direction approximately corresponding to the peak of the $I(\rho)$ distributions.
327: For $\tau\geq 2$, all nodes disappear. In a different study, we have proposed
328: an optimized symbolic analysis method for the alignment of the indicator time series \cite{symbol}.
329: Based on the alignment of the underlying index with the futures data series,
330: we suggest that the nodes for $\tau=0$ correspond to the lead-lag relation of the two markets within
331: this region, which is approximately $\Delta t\sim 1$. Together
332: with the finding in Fig. 4(b), it therefore appears that a series of the $I^{(\tau)}(\rho)$
333: for various values $\tau$ may be useful in lead-lag causality analysis of closely
334: related financial markets.
335:
336:
337: \section{Conclusion}
338:
339: A framework for studying market statistics and its stylized facts based on the internal
340: rate of return from single transactions has been proposed and compared with the common
341: log normalized return approach. Based on the present formulation, an interesting stylized
342: fact was observed in the coinciding location of the optimal density of internal
343: rate of return, $\rho^*$, in the $I(\rho)$ probability distributions
344: of TOPIX, S $\&$ P 500 and FTSE 100 index data series on a ten year scale. The IRR
345: transform allows, in addition, for a spectral characteristics of single encounter
346: strategies, which was demonstrated on the TOPIX data series for several cases
347: of trend-following strategies. The discrete $p(\rho)$ spectrum may serve as a fingerprint
348: of particular market strategy; it can also possibly allow for determining the type of
349: investment strategy from the series of its returns on individual transactions. The
350: discrete spectrum feature may also present an interesting point of view on the possible
351: role of moving averages in the stylized facts in numerical time series. The
352: IRR transform has been further generalized by introducing a minimal interval $\tau$
353: on compound interest time period, which screens the $I(\rho)$ spectrum in a monotonous
354: way. This generalization allowed for indirect identification of the lead-lag
355: relation in the minute-tick series of NIKKEI 225 and its derivative market in
356: the first two quartals of the year 2000.
357:
358: %
359: \section*{Acknowledgments}
360: The authors would like to acknowledge a partial support by the Japan
361: Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and Academic Frontier
362: Program of the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
363: and Technology (MEXT).
364:
365: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
366: \bibitem{s1}
367: H. E. Stanley and V. Plerou, “Scaling and Universality in Economics: Empirical results and Theoretical Interpretation,” Quantitative Finance 1, 563--567 (2001).
368: \bibitem{s2}
369: S.-H. Chen, T. Lux, and M. Marchesi, “Testing for non-linear structure in an artificial financial market,” Journal of Economic Behavior $\&$ Organization 46(3) p. 327--342 (2001).
370: \bibitem{s3}
371: T. Kaizoji and M. Kaizoji, “Exponential laws of a stock price index and a stochastic model,” Advances in Complex Systems 6 (3) p. 1--10, 2003.
372: \bibitem{s4}
373: A. Carbone, G. Castelli, and H. E. Stanley, “Time-Dependent Hurst Exponent in Financial Time Series,” Physica A 344 p. 267--27 (2004).
374: \bibitem{s5}
375: F. Wang, et al., “Scaling and Memory of Intraday Volatility Return Intervals in Stock Market,” Phys. Rev. E 73 p. 026117 (2005).
376: \bibitem{s6}
377: J. McCauley, “Thermodynamic analogies in economics and finance: instability of markets,” Physica A 329 p. 199--212 (2003).
378: \bibitem{s7}
379: Y. Chen, E. Lopez, S. Havlin, and H. E. Stanley, “Universal Behavior of Optimal Paths in Weighted Networks with General Disorder,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 p. 068702 (2006).
380: \bibitem{m1}
381: J. D. Farmer, D. E. Smith, and M. Shubik. “Is Economics the Next Physical Science?” Physics Today 58(9) p. 37--42 (2005).
382: \bibitem{m2}
383: T. Lux and S. Schornstein, “Genetic learning as an explanation of stylized facts of foreign exchange markets,” Journal of Mathematical Economics 41(1-2) p. 169--196 (2005).
384: \bibitem{m3}
385: P. Sen and B. K. Chakrabarti, “Small-world phenomena and the statistics of linear polymers,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 p. 7749--7755 (2001).
386: \bibitem{m4}
387: H. Takayasu, A. Sato, M. Takayasu, “Stable Infinite Variance Fluctuations in Randomly Amplified Langevin Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 p. 966–-969 (1997).
388: \bibitem{slanina}
389: F. Slanina, On the possibility of optimal investment, Physica A 269 p. 554--563 1999.
390: \bibitem{bern}
391: D. Bernoulli, “Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk” (1738), also Econometrica 22 p. 23--36 (1954).
392: \bibitem{kelly}
393: Jr. J. L. Kelly, “A new interpretation of the Information Rate,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 35 p. 917 (1956).
394: \bibitem{symbol}
395: L. Pichl, T. Yamano, and T. Kaizoji, “On the Symbolic Analysis of Market Indicators with the Dynamic Programming Approach,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3973 p. 432-441 (2006).
396: \end{thebibliography}
397: \end{document}
398: