1: \begin{abstract}

2: Many tasks in geometry processing are modeled as \newhl{variational problems}

3: solved numerically using the finite element method.

4: %

5: For solid shapes, this requires a volumetric discretization, such as a boundary

6: conforming tetrahedral mesh.

7: %

8: Unfortunately, tetrahedral meshing remains an open challenge and existing

9: methods either struggle to conform to complex boundary surfaces or require

10: manual intervention to prevent failure.

11: %

12: Rather than create a single volumetric mesh for the entire shape, we advocate

13: for solid geometry processing on \emph{deconstructed domains}, where a large

14: and complex shape is composed of overlapping solid subdomains.

15: %

16: As each smaller and simpler part is now easier to tetrahedralize, the question

17: becomes how to account for overlaps during problem modeling and how to couple

18: solutions on each subdomain together \emph{algebraically}.

19: %

20: We explore how and why previous coupling methods fail, and propose a method that

21: couples solid domains only along their boundary surfaces. 

22: %

23: We demonstrate the superiority of this method through empirical convergence

24: tests and qualitative applications to solid geometry processing on a variety

25: of popular second-order and fourth-order partial differential equations.

26: \end{abstract}

27: