d454263905fa3acf.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: We examine the Kosterlitz--Thouless universality class and show 
4: that essential scaling at this type of phase transition is not 
5: self--consistent unless multiplicative logarithmic corrections 
6: are included. In the case of specific heat these logarithmic 
7: corrections are identified analytically. To identify those 
8: corresponding to the susceptibility we set up a numerical method 
9: involving the finite--size scaling of Lee--Yang zeroes. We also 
10: study the density of zeroes and introduce a new concept called 
11: index scaling. We apply the method to the $XY$--model and the 
12: closely related step model in two dimensions. 
13: %Our method overcomes the hitherto encountered difficulties of 
14: %having to perform multi--parameter fits to extract the critical 
15: %coupling and critical indices from conventional thermodynamic 
16: %quantities. 
17: The critical parameters (including  logarithmic corrections) of 
18: the step model are compatable with those of the $XY$--model  
19: indicating  that both models belong to the same universality 
20: class. This result then raises questions over how a vortex binding 
21: scenario can be the driving mechanism for the phase transition. 
22: Furthermore, the logarithmic corrections identified numerically 
23: by our methods of fitting
24: are not in agreement with the renormalization group
25: predictions of Kosterlitz and Thouless.
26: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
27: \end{abstract}
28: