1: \begin{abstract} \noindent\begin{footnotesize}
2: With a motivation to find a 2-d Lorentz-invariant solution
3: of the \adss superstring we continue the study
4: of the Pohlmeyer-reduced form of this theory.
5: The reduced theory is constructed from currents
6: of the superstring sigma model
7: and is classically equivalent to it.
8: Its action is that of
9: $G/H=Sp(2,2)\x Sp(4)/[SU(2)]^4$ gauged WZW model
10: deformed by an integrable potential and coupled to fermions.
11: This theory is UV finite and is conjectured to be
12: related to the superstring theory also at the quantum level.
13: Expanded near the trivial vacuum it has the same elementary
14: excitations
15: (8+8 massive bosonic and fermionic 2-d degrees of freedom) as the
16: \adss superstring in the $S^5$ light-cone gauge or near plane-wave
17: expansion. In contrast to the superstring case,
18: the interaction terms in the reduced action
19: are manifestly 2-d Lorentz invariant.
20: Since the theory is integrable,
21: its S-matrix should be effectively determined by the two-particle
22: scattering. Here we explicitly
23: compute the tree-level two-particle
24: S-matrix for the elementary excitations
25: of the reduced theory. We find that this S-matrix
26: has the same
27: index structure and group factorization properties
28: as the superstring S-matrix computed in hep-th/0611169
29: but has simpler coefficients, depending only on the difference of two
30: rapidities.
31: While the gauge-fixed form of the reduced action has only
32: the bosonic
33: $[SU(2)]^4$ part of the $PSU(2|2) \times PSU(2|2)$ symmetry of the
34: light-cone superstring spectrum
35: as its manifest symmetry
36: we conjecture
37: that it should also have a hidden fermionic symmetry that
38: effectively interchanges bosons and fermions
39: and which should guide us towards understanding the relation
40: between the two S-matrices.
41: \end{footnotesize}
42: \end{abstract}
43: