1: \begin{abstract}

2: The impact of different linearisation and iterative solution strategies for

3: fully-coupled pressure-based algorithms for compressible flows at all speeds is

4: studied, with the aim of elucidating their impact on the performance of the

5: numerical algorithm. A fixed-coefficient linearisation and a Newton

6: linearisation of the transient and advection terms of the governing nonlinear

7: equations are compared, focusing on test-cases that feature acoustic, shock and

8: expansion waves. The linearisation and iterative solution strategy applied to

9: discretise and solve the nonlinear governing equations is found to have a

10: significant influence on the performance and stability of the numerical

11: algorithm. The Newton linearisation of the transient terms of the momentum and

12: energy equations is shown to yield a significantly improved convergence of the

13: iterative solution algorithm compared to a fixed-coefficient linearisation,

14: while the linearisation of the advection terms leads to substantial differences

15: in performance and stability at large Mach numbers and large Courant numbers. It

16: is further shown that the consistent Newton linearisation of all transient and

17: advection terms of the governing equations allows, in the context of coupled

18: pressure-based algorithms, to eliminate all forms of underrelaxation and

19: provides a clear performance benefit for flows in all Mach number regimes.

20: \end{abstract}

21: