d85a75bab20f8ed6.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Classical navigation planners %for mobile robots 
3: can provide safe navigation, albeit often suboptimally and with hindered human norm compliance. 
4: %With the help of ML algorithms, 
5: %In contrast, 
6: ML-based, contemporary autonomous navigation algorithms
7: %, with the help of machine learning methodologies, 
8: can imitate more natural and human-compliant navigation, but
9: %. However, they 
10: usually require large and realistic datasets and do not always provide safety guarantees.
11: We present an approach that leverages a classical algorithm to guide reinforcement learning. This greatly improves the results and convergence rate of the underlying RL algorithm and requires no
12: human-expert demonstrations to jump-start the process.
13: %. And unlike methods that use human demonstrations to jump-start the process, it requires no human effort. 
14: Additionally, we incorporate a practical fallback system that can switch back to a classical planner to ensure safety. 
15: The outcome is a sample efficient ML approach for mobile navigation that builds on classical algorithms, improves them to ensure human compliance, and guarantees safety.
16: 
17: \end{abstract}
18: