1: \begin{abstract} % type your abstract below

2: A $K(\pi,1)$--foliation is one for which the universal covers of all leaves 

3: are contractible (thus all leaves are $K(\pi,1)$'s for some $\pi$). In the first part

4: of the paper we show that the tangential Lusternik--Schnirelmann

5: category $\cat\cF$ of a $K(\pi,1)$--foliation $\cF$ on a manifold $M$ is bounded from

6: below by

7: $t-\codim \cF$ for any $t$ with $H_t(M;A)\neq 0$ for some coefficient group $A$.

8: Since for any

9: $C^2$--foliation $\cF$ one has $\cat\cF\leq$ $\dim\cF$ by our earlier work \cite[Theorem~5.2]{SinV}, this

10: implies that

11: $\cat\cF = \dim\cF$ for  $K(\pi,1)$--foliations of class $C^2$ on closed manifolds.

12: 

13: For $K(\pi,1)$--foliations on open

14: manifolds the above estimate is far from optimal, so one might hope for some other

15: homological lower bound for $\cat\cF$. In the second part we see that foliated

16: cohomology will not work. For we show that the $p$--th foliated cohomology group of a

17: $p$--dimensional foliation of positive codimension  is an infinite dimensional vector

18: space, if the foliation is obtained from a foliation of a manifold by removing

19: an appropriate closed set, for example a point. But there are simple examples of

20: $K(\pi,1)$--foliations of this type with $\cat\cF<$ $\dim\cF$. Other, more interesting

21: examples of  $K(\pi,1)$--foliations on open manifolds are provided by the finitely 

22: punctured Reeb foliations on lens spaces whose tangential category we calculate.

23: 

24: In the final section we show that  $C^1$--foliations of tangential

25: category at most 1   on closed  manifolds are locally trivial homotopy

26: sphere bundles. Thus among $2$--dimensional $C^2$--foliations  on closed

27: manifolds the only ones whose tangential category is still unknown are those which are

28: $2$--sphere bundles which do not admit sections.

29: \end{abstract}

30: