d943c0afe2f3ad89.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: % %Domain adaptation is transfer learning which aims to generalize a learning model across training and testing data with different distributions. 
3: % Domain adaptation is transfer learning which aims to  generalize a learning model across training and testing data {of}
4: % different distributions.
5: % {Most previous methodologies} tackle this problem in seeking a shared feature representation between source and target domains while reducing the mismatch of their data distributions. 
6: % In this paper, we propose a close yet discriminative domain adaptation method (CDDA), which generates a latent feature representation {space satisfying two  \emph{important desired} properties} in terms of discriminative learning. First, we model, via Maximum Mean Discrepancy,  the discrepancies between the source and target domain for both  marginal and conditional probability distributions, and  minimize their distances, so as to \emph{attract} two domains close to each other.  
7: % Second, we  design a repulsive force so as to \emph{drag} different classes far away from each other. %{This mechanism thereby enhance the discriminative property of learned adapted domain. }
8: % Furthermore, to account for the underlying geometric structure of the data manifold, we  propose to consider two additional constraints in our model: a)  label smoothness and b) geometric structure consistency via label propagation.
9: % We optimize the framework by decompress them into two sub-problems and solve them in an iterative process. 
10: % Extensive experiments are conducted on  36 cross-domain image classification tasks over four public datasets. %with provided two features.% e.g. SURE features and DEEP features.  
11: % Comprehensive results show that the proposed method consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art methods with significant margins.  We also disclose its performance on   convergence and parameter sensitivity. 
12: % \end{abstract}
13: