1: \begin{abstract}

2: The `gold standard' design for three-arm trials refers to trials with an active control and a placebo control in addition to the experimental treatment group. 

3: This trial design is recommended when being ethically justifiable and it allows the simultaneous comparison of experimental treatment, active control, and placebo.

4: Parametric testing methods have been studied plentifully over the past years.

5: However, these methods often tend to be liberal or conservative when distributional assumptions are not met particularly with small sample sizes. 

6: In this article, we introduce a studentized permutation test for testing non-inferiority and superiority of the experimental treatment compared to the active control in three-arm trials in the `gold standard' design. 

7: The performance of the studentized permutation test for finite sample sizes is assessed in a Monte-Carlo simulation study under various parameter constellations. 

8: Emphasis is put on whether the studentized permutation test meets the target significance level. 

9: For comparison purposes, commonly used Wald-type tests are included in the simulation study. 

10: The simulation study shows that the presented studentized permutation test for assessing non-inferiority in three-arm trials in the `gold standard' design outperforms its competitors for count data.

11: The methods discussed in this paper are implemented in the R package {\tt{ThreeArmedTrials}} which is available on the comprehensive R archive network (CRAN).

12: \end{abstract}

13: