dbb7959fd2b01147.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We contrast the transport properties (dc resistivity, Seebeck
3: coefficient), optical conductivity, spectral functions, dynamical
4: magnetic susceptibility, and the NMR $1/T_1$ spin-lattice relaxation
5: rate of the repulsive and attractive infinite-dimensional Hubbard
6: models in the paramagnetic phase for a generic band filling. The
7: calculations are performed in a wide temperature interval using the
8: dynamical mean-field theory with the numerical renormalization group
9: as the impurity solver. The attractive case exhibits significantly
10: more complex temperature dependences which can be explained by the
11: behavior of the half-filled Hubbard model in external magnetic field
12: with constant magnetization, to which the attractive Hubbard model
13: maps through the partial particle-hole transformation. The resistivity
14: is non-monotonous for strongly attractive case: it peaks significantly
15: above the MIR value at a temperature $T_\mathrm{max}$ where the
16: quasiparticle band disappears. For both signs of $U$ we find
17: particle-hole asymmetry in the self-energy at low energies, but with
18: the opposite kind of excitations having longer lifetime. This leads to
19: a strong suppression of the slope of the Seebeck coefficient in the
20: attractive case, rather than an enhancement as in the repulsive case.
21: The spin-lattice relaxation rate in the strongly attractive case has a
22: non-monotonic temperature dependence, thereby revealing the pairing
23: fluctuations.
24: \end{abstract}
25: