1: \begin{abstract}

2: J. Hopcroft and D. Sheldon originally introduced network reputation games

3: to investigate the self-interested behavior of 

4: web authors who want to maximize their PageRank 

5: on a \emph{directed} web graph by 

6: choosing their outlinks in a game theoretic manner.

7: They give best response strategies for each player

8: and characterize properties of web graphs which are Nash equilibria.

9: In this paper we consider three different models for 

10: PageRank games on \emph{undirected} graphs such as certain social networks.

11: In undirected graphs players may delete links at will, but typically cannot

12: add links without the other player's permission.

13: In the \emph{deletion-model}

14: players are free to delete any of their bidirectional links but may not add links.

15: We study the problem of determining whether the given graph represents

16: a Nash equilibrium or not in this model.

17: We give an $O(n^{2})$ time algorithm for a tree,

18: and a parametric $O(2^{k}n^{4})$ time algorithm for general graphs,

19: where $k$ is the maximum vertex degree in any biconnected component of the graph.

20: In the \emph{request-delete-model} players are free to delete any bidirectional 

21: links and add any directed links,

22: since these additions can be done unilaterally and can

23: be viewed as requests for bidirected links. For this model we give an

24: $O(n^3)$ time algorithm for verifying Nash equilibria in trees.

25: Finally, in the \emph{add-delete-model} we allow a node to make arbitrary deletions 

26: and the addition of a single bidirectional

27: link if it would increase the page rank of the other player also.

28: In this model we give a parametric algorithm for verifying Nash equilibria in

29: general graphs and characterize so called $\alpha$-insensitive Nash Equilibria.

30: We also give a result showing a large class of graphs where there is an edge addition

31: that causes the PageRank of both of its endpoints to increase, suggesting

32: convergence towards complete subgraphs.

33: \end{abstract}

34: