1: \begin{abstract}

2:     We show that, for any sufficiently small fixed $\epsilon > 0$, when both players in a \emph{general-sum two-player (bimatrix) game} employ \emph{optimistic mirror descent (OMD)} with smooth regularization, learning rate $\eta = O(\epsilon^2)$ and $T = \Omega(\poly(1/\epsilon))$ repetitions, either the dynamics reach an \emph{$\epsilon$-approximate Nash equilibrium (NE)}, or the average correlated distribution of play is an \emph{$\Omega(\poly(\epsilon))$-strong coarse correlated equilibrium (CCE)}: any possible unilateral deviation does not only leave the player worse, but will decrease its utility by $\Omega(\poly(\epsilon))$. As an immediate consequence, when the iterates of OMD are bounded away from being Nash equilibria in a bimatrix game, we guarantee convergence to an \emph{exact} CCE after only $O(1)$ iterations. Our results reveal that uncoupled no-regret learning algorithms can converge to CCE in general-sum games remarkably faster than to NE in, for example, zero-sum games. To establish this, we show that when OMD does not reach arbitrarily close to a NE, the \emph{(cumulative) regret} of \emph{both} players is not only \emph{negative}, but \emph{decays linearly} with time. Given that regret is the canonical measure of performance in online learning, our results suggest that cycling behavior of no-regret learning algorithms in games can be justified in terms of efficiency.

3: \end{abstract}

4: