1: \begin{abstract}

2: %%A manifold $M$ admits an {\em $\rpn$-structure} if it admits an atlas of charts to 

3: %%$\SI^n$ with transition maps in $\SL_\pm(n+1, \bR)$. 

4: %%This is equivalent for the univesal cover $\tilde M$ to have an immersion 

5: %%$\dev: \tilde M \ra \rpn$ equivariant with respect to a homomorphism 

6: %%$h: \pi_1(M) \ra \PGL(n+1, \bR)$. 

7: %%We provide a proof that $\rpn \# \rpn$ and a few others do not admit an $\rpn$-structure for $n\geq 3$. Notably it is shorter than the ones by Cooper-Goldman for $n=3$ and Coban for $n\geq 4$.  

8: %%Along the way, we will classify closed $\rpn$-manifolds with infinite cyclic holonomy groups following Benoist. 

9: %%We will use a powerful tool of the $n$-octantizability of $\rpn$-manifolds with nilpotent holonomy groups of Benoist and Smillie. 

10: %A manifold $M$ possesses an {\em $\rpn$-structure} if it has an atlas consisting of charts mapping to $\SI^n$, where the transition maps lie in $\SL_\pm(n+1, \bR)$. In this context, we present a concise proof demonstrating that $\rpn\#\rpn$ and a few other manifolds do not possess an $\rpn$-structure when $n\geq3$. Notably, our proof is shorter than those provided by Cooper-Goldman for $n=3$ and Coban for $n\geq 4$. To do this, we will classify closed $\rpn$-manifolds with infinite cyclic holonomy groups based on Benoist's work. We will leverage the concept of $n$-octantizability of $\rpn$-manifolds with nilpotent holonomy groups, as introduced by Benoist and Smillie, which serves as a powerful tool.

11: %\end{abstract}

12: