1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3:     An observation of Jupiter's tidal response is anticipated for the on-going

4:     \textit{Juno} spacecraft mission. We combine self-consistent, numerical

5:     models of Jupiter's equilibrium tidal response with observed Doppler shifts

6:     from the \textit{Juno} gravity science experiment to test the sensitivity of

7:     the spacecraft to tides raised by the Galilean satellites and the Sun. The

8:     concentric Maclaurin spheroid (CMS) method finds the equilibrium shape and

9:     gravity field of a rotating, liquid planet with the tide raised by a

10:     satellite, expanded in Love numbers ($k_{nm}$). We present improvements to

11:     CMS theory that eliminate an unphysical center of mass offset  and study in

12:     detail the convergence behavior of the CMS approach.  We demonstrate that

13:     the dependence of $k_{nm}$ with orbital distance is important when

14:     considering the combined tidal response for Jupiter. Conversely, the details

15:     of the interior structure have a negligible influence on $k_{nm}$, for

16:     models that match the zonal harmonics $J_2$, $J_4$ and $J_6$, already

17:     measured to high precision by \textit{Juno}.  As the mission continues,

18:     improved coverage of Jupiter’s gravity field at different phases of Io’s

19:     orbit is expected to yield an observed value for the degree-2 Love number

20:     ($k_{22}$) and potentially select higher--degree $k_{nm}$. We present a test

21:     of the sensitivity of the \textit{Juno} Doppler signal to the calculated

22:     $k_{nm}$, which suggests the detectability of $k_{33}$, $k_{42}$ and

23:     $k_{31}$, in addition to $k_{22}$. A mismatch of a robust \textit{Juno}

24:     observation with the remarkably small range in calculated Io equilibrium

25:     $k_{22}=0.58976\pm0.0001$, would indicate a heretofore uncharacterized

26:     dynamic contribution to the tides.

27: 

28: \end{abstract}

29: