1: \begin{abstract}

2: We consider the fundamental problem of solving a large-scale system of linear equations. In particular, we consider the setting where a taskmaster intends to solve the system in a distributed/federated fashion with the help of a set of machines, who each have a subset of the equations. Although there exist several approaches for solving this problem, missing is a rigorous comparison between the convergence rates of the projection-based methods and those of the optimization-based ones. In this paper, we analyze and compare these two classes of algorithms with a particular focus on the most efficient method from each class, namely, the recently proposed Accelerated Projection-Based Consensus (APC)~\cite{azizan2019distributed} and the Distributed Heavy-Ball Method (D-HBM). To this end, we first propose a geometric notion of data heterogeneity called \emph{angular heterogeneity} and discuss its generality. Using this notion, we bound and compare the convergence rates of the studied algorithms and capture the effects of both cross-machine and local data heterogeneity on these quantities. Our analysis results in a number of novel insights besides showing that APC is the most efficient method in realistic scenarios where there is a large data heterogeneity. Our numerical analyses validate our theoretical results.

3: \end{abstract}

4: