e676642da254aad9.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Consider the following classes of pairs consisting of a group and a finite collection of subgroups:
3: \begin{itemize}
4: \item \( \mathcal{C}= \left\{ (G,\mathcal H) \mid \text{$\mathcal{H}$ is hyperbolically embedded in $G$} \right\} \) 
5: 
6: \item \( \mathcal{D}= \left\{ (G,\mathcal H) \mid \text{the relative Dehn function of $(G,\mathcal H)$ is well-defined} \right\} .\) 
7: \end{itemize}
8: Let $G$ be a group that splits as a finite graph of groups such that each vertex group $G_v$ is assigned a finite collection of subgroups $\mathcal{H}_v$, and each edge group $G_e$ is conjugate to a subgroup of some $H\in \mathcal{H}_v$ if $e$ is adjacent to $v$.
9:  Then there is a finite collection of subgroups $\mathcal{H}$ of $G$ such that 
10: \begin{enumerate}
11:     \item If each $(G_v, \mathcal{H}_v)$ is in $\mathcal C$, then $(G,\mathcal{H})$ is in $\mathcal C$.
12:  
13:     \item If each $(G_v, \mathcal{H}_v)$ is in $\mathcal D$, then $(G,\mathcal{H})$ is in $\mathcal D$.
14:     
15:     \item For any vertex $v$ and for any $g\in G_v$, the element $g$ is conjugate to an element in some $Q\in\mathcal{H}_v$ if and only if $g$ is conjugate to an element in some $H\in\mathcal{H}$.
16: \end{enumerate}
17: That edge groups are not assumed to be finitely generated and that they do not necessarily belong to a peripheral collection of subgroups of an adjacent vertex are the main differences between this work and previous results in the literature. \end{abstract}
18: