1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: 

4: 

5: %Let $(W,S)$ be a finite, irreducible Coxeter system.

6: For each finite, irreducible Coxeter system $(W,S)$, Lusztig has  associated a set of ``unipotent characters'' $\Uch(W)$. There is also a notion of  a ``Fourier transform'' on the space of functions $\Uch(W) \to \RR$, due to Lusztig for Weyl groups and to Brou\'e, Lusztig, and Malle in the remaining cases.

7: This paper concerns a certain $W$-representation $\varrho_{W}$  in the vector space generated by the  involutions of $W$. Our main result is to show that the 

8: irreducible multiplicities of $\varrho_W$ are given by the Fourier transform of a unique function $\fsd : \Uch(W) \to \{-1,0,1\}$, which for various reasons serves naturally as a  heuristic definition of  the Frobenius-Schur indicator on $\Uch(W)$. 

9: The formula we obtain for $\fsd$ extends prior work of Casselman, Kottwitz, Lusztig, and Vogan addressing the case in which $W$ is a Weyl group.

10: We include in addition a succinct combinatorial description of the irreducible decomposition of $\varrho_W$ derived by Kottwitz when $(W,S)$ is classical, and

11: prove that $\varrho_{W}$ defines a Gelfand model  if and only if $(W,S)$ has type $A_n$, $H_3$, or $I_2(m)$ with $m$ odd.

12: We  show finally  that a conjecture of Kottwitz connecting the decomposition of $\varrho_W$ to the left cells of $W$ holds in all non-crystallographic types, and observe that a weaker form of Kottwitz's conjecture holds in general. In giving these results, we  carefully survey the construction and notable properties of the set $\Uch(W)$ and its attached Fourier transform.

13: 

14:  \end{abstract}

15: