1: \begin{abstract}

2:   In this paper, we study the descriptive set theoretic complexity of

3:   the equivalence relation of conjugacy of Toeplitz subshifts of a

4:   residually finite group $G$. On the one hand, we show that if

5:   $G = \Z$, then topological conjugacy on Toeplitz subshifts with

6:   separated holes is amenable. In contrast, if $G$ is non-amenable,

7:   then conjugacy of Toeplitz $G$-subshifts is a non-amenable

8:   equivalence relation. The results were motivated by a general

9:   question, asked by Gao, Jackson and Seward, about the complexity of

10:   conjugacy for minimal, free subshifts of countable groups.

11: \end{abstract}