e897707ca4d5abff.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We present a cosmographic study designed to test the simplest type 
3: of accelerating cosmology: a flat universe with matter and a 
4: cosmological constant ($\Lambda$). Hubble series expansions are fit 
5: to the SCP Union2.1 supernova data set to estimate the Hubble Constant 
6: ($H_{0}$), the deceleration parameter ($q_{0}$), and the jerk parameter 
7: ($j_{0}$). Flat $\Lambda$CDM models always require $j_{0} = 1$, 
8: providing a single-parameter test of the entire paradigm. 
9: Because of convergence issues for $z \gtrsim 1$, we use expansions 
10: in $y$-redshift as well as $z$-redshift; and to estimate the effects 
11: of ``model-building uncertainties'' -- the dependence of the output 
12: results upon the fitting function and parameters used -- we perform 
13: fits using five different distance indicator functions, and 
14: four different polynomial orders. We find that one cannot yet 
15: use the supernova data to reliably obtain more than four 
16: cosmological parameters; and that cosmographic estimates 
17: of $j_{0}$ remain dominated by model-building uncertainties, 
18: in conjunction with statistical and other error sources. 
19: While $j_{0} = 1$ remains consistent with Union2.1, the 
20: most restrictive bound that we can place is $j_{0} \sim [-7.6,8.5]$. 
21: To test the future prospects of cosmography with new standard candle 
22: data, two mock supernova data sets are created; and it is found that 
23: the best way to reduce model-building uncertainties on lower-order 
24: Hubble parameters (such as $\{ H_{0}, q_{0}, j_{0} \}$) is by 
25: truncating the data set above a specified redshift cutoff. Thus a 
26: larger quantity of data, not higher-redshift data, is needed to 
27: sharpen cosmographic tests of flat $\Lambda$CDM.
28: \end{abstract}
29: