1: \begin{abstract}

2: One of the fundamental principles driving diversity or homogeneity in

3: domains such as cultural differentiation, political affiliation, and product

4: adoption is the tension between two forces:

5: influence (the tendency of people to become similar to others they

6: interact with) and

7: selection (the tendency to be affected most by the behavior

8: of others who are already similar).

9: Influence tends to promote homogeneity within a society, while

10: selection frequently causes fragmentation.

11: When both forces are in effect simultaneously, it becomes an

12: interesting question to analyze which societal outcomes should be

13: expected.

14: 

15: In order to study the joint effects of these forces more

16: formally, we analyze a natural model built upon

17: active lines of work in political opinion formation, cultural diversity,

18: and language evolution.

19: Our model posits an arbitrary graph structure describing which

20: ``types'' of people can influence one another: this captures

21: effects based on the fact that people are only influenced by

22: sufficiently similar interaction partners.

23: In a generalization of the model, we introduce another graph structure

24: describing which

25: types of people even so much as come in contact with each other.

26: These restrictions on interaction patterns can

27: significantly alter the dynamics of the process at the population level.

28: 

29: For the basic version of the model, in which all

30: individuals come in contact with all others, we achieve an essentially

31: complete characterization of (stable) equilibrium outcomes and prove

32: convergence from all starting states.

33: For the other extreme case, in which individuals only come in contact

34: with others 

35: who have the potential to influence them,

36: the underlying process is

37: significantly more complicated; nevertheless we present an analysis

38: for certain graph structures.

39: \end{abstract}

40: