1: \begin{abstract}

2: The recently introduced \emph{energy-saving} extension of the

3: \emph{sub-optimal sliding mode control} allows for the control-off

4: phases during convergence to the second-order equilibrium. It

5: enables, this way, a lower energy consumption comparing to the

6: original sub-optimal sliding mode (SM) algorithm, for the

7: commutating discontinuous control signal. In this paper, the

8: energy-saving sub-optimal SM control is experimentally benchmarked

9: against a standard second-order SM controller which has also

10: discontinuous control action. Here the so-called terminal

11: second-order SM algorithm is used. The system plant is affected by

12: the matched bounded disturbances which are unknown, and the output

13: is subject to the sensing noise. Also, a first-order actuator

14: dynamics can lead to an additional chattering in SM applications.

15: For a fair comparison, the same (quadratic) terminal surface is

16: designed when benchmarking both SM controllers. Moreover, the

17: experimentally compared SM algorithms share the same amplitude and

18: initial conditions.

19: \end{abstract}

20: