1: \begin{abstract}

2: Realistically---and equitably---modeling the dynamics of group-level disparities

3: in machine learning remains an open problem. In particular, we desire models

4: that do \emph{not} suppose inherent differences between artificial groups of

5: people---but rather endogenize disparities by appeal to unequal \emph{initial

6: conditions} of insular subpopulations.  In this paper, agents each have a

7: real-valued feature $X$ (\eg, credit score) informed by a ``true'' binary label

8: $Y$ representing \emph{qualification} (\eg, for a loan).  Each agent alternately

9: (1) receives a binary classification label $\hat{Y}$ (\eg, loan approval) from a

10: Bayes-optimal machine learning classifier observing $X$ and (2) may update their

11: qualification $Y$ by imitating successful \emph{strategies} (\eg, seek a raise)

12: within an isolated group $G$ of agents to which they belong. We consider the

13: disparity of qualification rates $\Pr(Y=1)$ between different groups and how

14: this disparity changes subject to a sequence of Bayes-optimal classifiers

15: repeatedly retrained on the global population.  We model the evolving

16: qualification rates of each subpopulation (group) using the replicator equation,

17: which derives from a class of imitation processes.  We show that differences in

18: qualification rates between subpopulations can persist indefinitely for a set of

19: non-trivial equilibrium states due to uniformed classifier deployments, even

20: when groups are identical in all aspects except initial qualification densities.

21: We next simulate the effects of commonly proposed fairness interventions on this

22: dynamical system along with a new feedback control mechanism capable of

23: permanently eliminating group-level qualification rate disparities.  We conclude

24: by discussing the limitations of our model and findings and by outlining

25: potential future work.

26: \end{abstract}

27: