1: \begin{abstract}

2: The finite strain theory is reformulated in the frame of the Tangential

3: Differential Calculus (TDC) resulting in a unification in a threefold

4: sense. Firstly, ropes, membranes and three-dimensional continua are

5: treated with \emph{one} set of governing equations. Secondly, the

6: reformulated boundary value problem applies to parametrized \emph{and}

7: implicit geometries. Therefore, the formulation is more general than

8: classical ones as it does not rely on parametrizations implying curvilinear

9: coordinate systems and the concept of co- and contravariant base vectors.

10: This leads to the third unification: TDC-based models are applicable

11: to two fundamentally different numerical approaches. On the one hand,

12: one may use the classical Surface FEM where the geometry is discretized

13: by curved one-dimensional elements for ropes and two-dimensional surface

14: elements for membranes. On the other hand, it also applies to recent

15: Trace FEM approaches where the geometry is immersed in a higher-dimensional

16: background mesh. Then, the shape functions of the background mesh

17: are evaluated on the trace of the immersed geometry and used for the

18: approximation. As such, the Trace FEM is a fictitious domain method

19: for partial differential equations on manifolds. The numerical results

20: show that the proposed finite strain theory yields higher-order convergence

21: rates independent of the numerical methodology, the dimension of the

22: manifold, and the geometric representation type.

23: 

24: Keywords: finite strain theory, ropes, membranes, Trace FEM, fictitious

25: domain method, embedded domain method, PDEs on manifolds

26: \end{abstract}

27: