1: \begin{abstract}

2: Quantum Monte Carlo and semiclassical methods are used to solve two and four

3: site cluster dynamical mean field approximations to the square lattice Hubbard model

4: %addition from ajm

5: at half filling and strong coupling.

6: The energy, spin correlation function, phase boundary and electron spectral

7: function are computed and compared to available exact results. 

8: %for the half-filled strong coupling Hubbard model. 

9: The comparision permits a quantitative assessment

10: of the ability of the different methods to capture the effects of intersite spin correlations.

11: Two real space methods and one momentum space representation are investigated.

12: One of the two real space methods is found to be significantly worse:

13: in it, convergence to the correct results is found

14: to be slow and, for the spectral function, nonuniform in frequency, with unphysical

15: midgap states appearing. 

16: Analytical  arguments are presented showing that the discrepancy arises

17: %from an incorrect treatment of intersite spin correlations arising 

18: because the

19: method does not respect the pole structure of the self energy of the insulator.

20: Of the other two methods, the momentum space representation is 

21: found to provide the better approximation to the intersite terms in the energy

22: but neither approximation is particularly acccurate and the convergence of the momentum

23: space method is not uniform.

24: A few remarks on numerical methods

25: are made.

26: 

27: \end{abstract}

28: