1: \begin{abstract}

2:     We propose to learn non-convex regularizers with a \change{prescribed upper bound on} their weak-convexity modulus.

3:     Such regularizers give rise to variational denoisers that minimize a convex energy.

4:     They rely on few parameters (less than 15,000) and offer a signal-processing interpretation as they mimic handcrafted sparsity-promoting regularizers.

5:     Through numerical experiments, we show that such denoisers outperform convex-regularization methods as well as the popular BM3D denoiser.

6:     Additionally, the learned regularizer can be deployed to solve inverse problems with iterative schemes that provably converge.

7:     For both CT and MRI reconstruction, the regularizer generalizes well and offers an excellent tradeoff between performance, number of parameters, guarantees, and interpretability when compared to other \change{data-driven} approaches.

8:     %is on par with frameworks that rely on deep CNNs with few orders of magnitude more parameters.

9: 

10:     %Since we are able to efficiently control the modulus of weak convexity, the specific case of denoising can be guaranteed to be a convex optimization problem.

11:     %Hence, we can utilize standard convex optimization techniques, which provably converge to global minima.

12:     %In our numerical denoising experiments, we outperform the popular BM3D denoiser and several variational approaches that come with convergence guarantees across various noise scales.

13:     %Inspired by these findings, we also employ the learned regularizer for inverse problems, namely MRI and CT. 

14:     %As the interplay between forward operators and weak convexity is complicatd, we instead propose to use our regularizer in a PnP fashion, where we can guarantee convergence to stationary points.

15:     %Our numerical results confirm that our learned regularizer generalized well to generic inverse problems.

16: \end{abstract}

17: