1: \begin{abstract}

2: %\textcolor{red}{NOT CHECKED!!} 

3: The strong law of large numbers asserts that experimentally obtained mean values, in the limit of number of repetitions of the experiment going to infinity, converges almost surely 

4: %(but not surely because the convergence is not pointwise) 

5: to the theoretical predictions which are based on \textit{a priori} assumed constant values for  probabilities of the random events. Hence in most theoretical 

6: %upper bound 

7: calculations, we implicitly neglect fluctuations around the mean. However in practice, we can repeat the experiment only finitely many times, and hence fluctuations are inevitable, and 

8: %. Consequently the theoretical upper bounds no more hold. Hence if fluctuations are not taken care of, they 

9: may lead to erroneous judgments. 

10: It is theoretically possible to teleport an unknown quantum state, using entanglement, with unit fidelity. The experimentally achieved values are however sub-unit, and often, significantly so.

11: %However as of now, experimentally achieved quantum fidelities are significantly less than one. 

12: We show that when the number of repetitions of the experiment is small, there is significant probability of achieving a sub-unit 

13: %the preceding 

14: experimentally achieved quantum teleportation fidelity that uses entanglement, 

15: %(i.e., using entanglement) 

16: even classically, i.e., without using entanglement. We further show that only when the number of repetitions of the experiment is of the order of a few thousands, the 

17: %preceding 

18: probability 

19: %corresponding to 

20: of a 

21: classical teleportation process to reach the currently achieved experimental quantum teleportation fidelities becomes negligibly small, and hence ensure that the experimentally obtained fidelities are due to genuine use of the shared entanglements.

22: \end{abstract}

23: